Book contents
- Emerging Governance of a Green Economy
- Emerging Governance of a Green Economy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Book Synopsis
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Green Economy
- 2 The Green Economy
- 3 The Green Economy as Good Governance
- 4 On the Verge of a Second Revolution in the European Union’s Utilities Market for Energy Production?
- 5 ‘Great Expectations’
- 6 Overcoming Structural Disadvantages with Local Green Economies?
- 7 Shifting Models of Energy Companies towards Green Economy in Europe
- 8 Carbon Calculation and the Urban Green Economic Opportunity
- 9 The Green Economy
- Index
- References
5 - ‘Great Expectations’
The Green Economy Discourse and Practice in Romania
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2021
Book contents
- Emerging Governance of a Green Economy
- Emerging Governance of a Green Economy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Book Synopsis
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Green Economy
- 2 The Green Economy
- 3 The Green Economy as Good Governance
- 4 On the Verge of a Second Revolution in the European Union’s Utilities Market for Energy Production?
- 5 ‘Great Expectations’
- 6 Overcoming Structural Disadvantages with Local Green Economies?
- 7 Shifting Models of Energy Companies towards Green Economy in Europe
- 8 Carbon Calculation and the Urban Green Economic Opportunity
- 9 The Green Economy
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter looks at the extent to which the green economy agenda is nothing more than ‘business as usual’ focused on growth and investment in the case of an unlikely green state. Romania had limited credentials with regard to ambitious environmental policy and a difficult transition to market economy and democracy. However, Romania has surprisingly experienced the emergence of a green economy discourse separate from sustainable development and a range of green economy initiatives in niche sectors and across different levels of government, with a peak of activity in 2016-2017. The chapter links this to the agenda of a technocratic caretaker Government, as well as the emergence of subnational actors from the environmental movement and local and regional level, that was able to successfully engage in green economy initiatives, bypassing the national government level. Using the example of the renewable energy sector, this chapter shows that significant growth in this area usually associated with the green economy, does not necessarily ensure either sustained or green practices.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Emerging Governance of a Green EconomyCases of European Implementation, pp. 74 - 89Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Agerpres (2016). Ministrul Mediului: Pentru Romania, economia verde este o oportunitate de dezvoltare si stimulare a competitivitatii in noi sectoare de crestere economica, 9 June 2016, H : 10 :30, Bucharest. https://www.agerpres.ro/economie/2016/06/09/ministrul-mediului-pentru-romania-economia-verde-este-o-oportunitate-de-dezvoltare-si-stimulare-a-competitivitatii-in-noi-sectoare-de-crestere-economica-10-30-06 [Accessed on 10 August 2017].Google Scholar
Agerpres (2017). Prima ‘Declaratie privind protectia mediului in Romania’, semnata miercuri la Bucuresti. Romanian National Press Agency, 07/07/2017, h: 11:45, Bucharest. www.agerpres.ro/mediu/2017/06/07/prima-declaratie-privind-protectia-mediului-in-romania-semnata-miercuri-la-bucuresti-11-45-46 [Accessed on 10 August 2017].Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. and Lemos, M.C. (2007). A Greener revolution in the making? : environmental governance in the 21st century’ Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 49, 36–45.Google Scholar
Anghel, L., Vanghele, J.C. and Vieru, R. (2013). Green Jobs. Studiu la nivel national cu privire la situatia actuala in cee ace priveste locurile de munca verzi in Romania, Project co-financed by the European Social Fund, AMPOSDRU, Development of Human Resources 2007–2013, Invest in People! http://proiect.locuridemuncaverzi.ro/upload/pdf/studiu-national_A4_final_LA+Anexe_preview.pdf [Accessed on 11 July 2015].Google Scholar
Bürgin, A. (2015). National binding renewable energy targets for 2020, but not for 2030 anymore: why the European Commission developed from a supporter to a brakeman, Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 690–707.Google Scholar
Burns, C., Tobin, P. and Sewerin, S. eds. (2018). The Impact of the Economic Crisis on European Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzogany, A. (2015). Building governance on fragile grounds: lessons from Romania. Environment and Planning C, 33, 901–918.Google Scholar
Cairney, P. (2012). Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
CEC (2015). Commission Staff Working Document, Country Factsheet Romania, State of the Energy Union’, Brussels, 18 November 2015.Google Scholar
CEC (2017). Waste: Commission refers Romania to Court of Justice for failing to adopt national measures on waste management and waste prevention. Brussels, 27 April 2017. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-1047_en.htm [Accessed on 10 July 2017].Google Scholar
Christiansen, T. (1997). Reconstructing territorial space: from territorial politics to multilevel governance. In Jørgensen, K.E., ed., Reflective approaches to European governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Daugbjerg, C. and Halpin, D. (2010). Generating policy capacity in emerging green industries: the development of organic farming in Denmark and Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidescu, S. (2013). The Sustainable Development Discourse in post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe: the case of Romania. In Barnes, P. and Hoerber, T. C., eds., Sustainable Development and Governance in Europe. The evolution of the discourse on sustainability. London: Routledge, pp. 163–176.Google Scholar
Davidescu, S. (2017). The Europeanization of renewable energy policy in Romania. In Solorio, I. and Jorgens, H., eds., A Guide to EU Renewable Energy Policy: Comparing Europeanization and Domestic Policy Change in EU Member States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 204–223.Google Scholar
Davidescu, S. (2018). Environmental policy in times of crisis: Romania’s troubled transition’. In Burns, C., Tobin, P. and Sewerin, S., eds., The Impact of the Economic Crisis on European Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–151.Google Scholar
Davidescu, S., Hiteva, R. and Maltby, T. (2018). Two steps forward, on step back: renewable energy transitions in Bulgaria and Romania. Public Administration, 96(6), 11–25.Google Scholar
Death, C. (2014). The green economy in South Africa: global discourses and local politics. South African Journal of Political Studies, 41(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Death, C. (2015). Four discourses of the Green Economy in the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 36(12), 2207–2224.Google Scholar
Dinan, D., Nugent, N., and Paterson, W., eds. (2017) The European Union in Crisis. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Diplomat, The (2013). Romanian Renewable Energy Overview, on-line edition, Bucharest, available at www.energyguide.ro [Accessed on 15 March 2014].Google Scholar
Dobre, M. (2013). Energia verde cauta specialist, dar nu (prea) ofera locuri de munca. Carrers Online. http://www.cariereonline.ro/energia-verde-cauta-specialisti-da-nu-prea-ofera-locuri-de-munca?page=0,0 [Accessed on 17 October 2016].Google Scholar
Eurostat (2017). Europe 2020 indicators – poverty and social exclusion. June 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Europe_2020_indicators_-_poverty_and_social_exclusion [Accessed on 10 August 2017].Google Scholar
Faccer, K., Nahman, A. and Audouin, M. (2014). Interpreting the green economy: emerging discourses and their considerations for the Global South. Development Southern Africa, 31(5), 642–657.Google Scholar
Fairbrass, J. and Jordan, A. (2004). Multi-level Governance and Environmental Policy. In Bache, I. and Flinders, M., eds., Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, P. (2015). The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse? Environmental Politics, 24(1), 17–37.Google Scholar
Gellner, A. (2013). A confrontation between lobbyists, round two. The Diplomat ‘Romanian Renewable Energy Overview’, on-line edition, Bucharest, available at www.energyguide.ro [Accessed on 15 March 2014].Google Scholar
Gotev, G. (2017). Junker, Timmermans issue stern warning against Romania’s “backtracking”. Euractiv, 1 February 2017, Brussels. https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/juncker-timmermans-issue-stern-warning-against-romanias-backtracking/ [Accessed on 10 May 2017].Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001). Multilevel Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman &Littlefield.Google Scholar
IRCEM (2019). Romania’s strategy for the transition to a circular economy ROCES, 2020–2030’, Iasi. https://www.ircem.ro/roadmap-for-developing-a-strategy-on-the-circular-economy-in-romania/ [Accessed on 10 June 2019].Google Scholar
Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. In Cafruny, A. and Rosenthal, G., eds., The State of the European Community: The Maastricht Debate and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 391–411.Google Scholar
Marks, G., Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: state-centric vs. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.Google Scholar
Ministry of Environment, Waters and Forestry (MEWF) (2017). Manifest pentru Romania Verde: 400 de zile de guvernare tehnocrata de mediu. Ministru Cristiana Paṣca Palmer. November 2015–January 2017. http://www.mmediu.ro/articol/manifest-pentru-romania-verde/2090 [Accessed on 10 October 2017].Google Scholar
Miron, R. (2014). The socioeconomic impacts of local energy programmes: a case study of Avrig, Romania. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 25(3), 352–360.Google Scholar
Moyo, T. (2014). Green economy/growth policies and their implementation in the context of the renewable energy sector: The case of Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity, 9(2), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parau, C.E. (2015). Environmental Network Governance in Romania: Transnational Norm Entrepreneurs in the Shadow of the EU. In Stan, L., ed., Post-Communist Romania at 25: Linking Past, Present and Future. Boulder CO: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Romanian Government (2016). Romania Competitiva: Un proiect pentru o crestere economica sustenabila. Strategy, Ministry of Economy. http://www.economie.gov.ro/romania-competitiva [Accessed on 10 October 2017].Google Scholar
RWEA (2013). Despre RWEA. http://rwea.ro/despre-noi/despre-rwea/ [Accessed on 15 May 2014].Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, U. (2011). Europeanisation in new member and candidate states. Living Reviews in European Governance, 6(1).Google Scholar
Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty years of multi-level governance: ‘Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going? Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837.Google Scholar
TERRA Mileniul III (2011). Analiza factorilor de divergenta dintre actorii relevanti in sectorul energiei din surse regenerabile. CNCSIS funded project, Bucharest. http://terramileniultrei.ro/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Studiu-final.pdf [Accessed on 10 October 2014].Google Scholar
TERRA Mileniul III (2015). Orase Verzi – Regiuni Verzi [2015–2017]. 2 April 2015, Project website. http://terramileniultrei.ro/portfolio/orase-verzi-regiuni-verzi-2015-2017/ [Accessed on 10 August 2017].Google Scholar
Toke, D. (2011). Ecological modernisation, social movements and renewable energy. Environmental Politics, 20(1), 60–77.Google Scholar
Tortola, P.D. (2017). Clarifying multilevel governance. European Journal of Political Research, 56, 234–250.Google Scholar
United Nations (2001). Environmental Performance Review: Romania, Economic Commission for Europe. New York: Committee on Environmental Policy, UN Publications.Google Scholar
UNEP (2011). Towards a green economy, pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. A synthesis for policy makers. Nairobi, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf [Accessed on 11 August 2017].Google Scholar
World Bank (2012). Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development. Washington, DC, World Bank.Google Scholar