Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:56:08.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2022

Grace Qiao Zhang  and
Ming-Yu Tseng
Grace Qiao Zhang
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Perth
Ming-Yu Tseng
Affiliation:
National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Elasticity in Healthcare Communication
A Cross-Cultural Perspective
 , pp. 239 - 255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolphs, S., Atkins, S. & Harvey, K. (2007). Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in healthcare contexts. In Cutting, J., ed., Vague Language Explored. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 62–78.Google Scholar
Adolphs, S., Brown, B., Carter, R., Crawford, C. & Sahota, O. (2004). Applying corpus linguistics in a health care context. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K. (1997). I think – an English modal particle. In Swan, T. & Westvik, O. J., eds., Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2015). General extenders in learner language. In Groom, N., Charles, M. & John, S., eds., Corpora, Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1998). Claiming Power in Doctor-Patient Talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Akl, E. A., Oxman, A. D., Herrin, J., Vist, G. E., Terrenato, I., Sperati, F., Costiniuk, C., Blank, D. & Schünemann, H. (2011). Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12, CD006777.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (2010). Referring as a pragmatic act. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2919–2931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, K. (2016). The pragmeme of insult and some allopracts. In Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskes, I., eds., Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, pp. 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G. (2010). A contrastive approach to vague nouns. In Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W. & Schneider, S., eds., New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
Arribas-Ayllon, M., Sarangi, S. & Clarke, A. (2011). Promissory accounts of personalisation in the commercialisation of genomic knowledge. Communication & Medicine, 8(1), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, C. F. & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Babrow, A. S. & Mattson, M. (2011). Building health communication theories in the 21st Century. In Thompson, T. L., Parrott, R. & Nussbaum, J., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 18–35.Google Scholar
Babrow, A. S., Kasch, C. R. & Ford, L. A. (1998). The many meanings of ‘uncertainty’ in illness: Toward a systematic accounting. Health Communication, 10(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (translated by C. Emerson & edited by Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (translated and edited by Emerson, C.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (translated by V. W. McGee). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barry, C., Brescoll, V. L. & Gollust, S. E. (2013). Framing childhood obesity: How individualizing the problem affects public support for prevention. Political Psychology, 34(3), 327–349.Google Scholar
Basnyat, I., Nekmat, E., Jiang, S. h. & Lin, J. (2018). Applying the modified comprehensive model of information seeking to online health information seeking in the context of India. Journal of Health Communication, 23(6), 563–572.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. (1999). Genre. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1/2), 84–87.Google Scholar
Beach, W. (2002). Between dad and son: Initiating, delivering, and assimilating bad cancer news. Health Communication, 14(3), 271–298.Google Scholar
Beck, S. J., Paskewitz, E. A., Anderson, W. A., Bourdeaux, R. & Currie-Mueller, J. (2017). The task and relational dimensions of online social support. Health Communication, 32(3), 347–355.Google Scholar
Bennett, G. G. & Glasgow, R. E. (2009). The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: Actualizing their potential. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 273–292.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (5th ed.). Plymouth: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (2010). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (8th ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bigi, S. (2011). The persuasive role of ethos in doctor-patient interactions. Medicine & Communication, 8(1), 67–76.Google Scholar
Blackwell, S. E. (2010). Evaluation as a pragmatic act in Spanish film narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2945–2963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, T. O. & Adams-Blodnieks, M. (2007). The who and the what of usage of two cancer online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1249–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bol, N., Smets, E. M. A., Burgers, J. A., Samii, S. M., De Haes, H. C. J. M. & Van Weert, J. C. M. (2018). Older patients’ recall of online cancer information: Do ability and motivation matter more than chronological age? Journal of Health Communication, 23(1), 9–19.Google Scholar
Borah, P. & Xiao, X. (2018). The importance of ‘likes’: The interplay of message framing, source, and social endorsement on credibility perceptions of health information on Facebook. Journal of Health Communication, 23(4), 399–411.Google Scholar
Bradac, J. J., Mulac, A. & Thompson, S. A. (1995). Men’s and women’s use of intensifiers and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analyses. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28(2), 93–116.Google Scholar
Britt, R. K. (2017). Online social support for participants of Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Groups. Health Communication, 32(12), 1529–1538.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. & Norman, G. R. (1979). The communication of uncertainty. In Jones, D. L. C., ed., Eighteenth Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, pp. 205–213.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bursztajn, H. J., Brodsky, A., Feinbloom, R. I. & Hamm, R. M. (1990). Medical Choices, Medical Chances: How Patients, Families, and Physicians Can Cope with Uncertainty. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bylund, C. L., Fisher, C. L., Brashers, D., Edgerson, S., Glogowski, E. A., Boyar, S. R., Kemel, Y., Spencer, S. & Kissane, D. (2012). Sources of uncertainty about daughters’ breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(2), 292–304.Google Scholar
Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 881–909.Google Scholar
Caffi, C. (2009). Metapragmatics. In Mey, J. L., ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 625–630.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N. & Candlin, S. (2003). Health care communication: A problematic site for applied linguistics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 134–154.Google Scholar
Capone, A. (2005). Pragmemes. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(9), 1355–1371.Google Scholar
Capone, A. (2016). Introducing the notion of the pragmeme. In Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskes, I., eds., Pragmemes and the Theories of Language Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. xv–xxiv.Google Scholar
Capone, A. (2018). Pragmemes (again). Lingua, 209, 89–104.Google Scholar
Capone, A. & Bucca, A. (2018). Why did Trump say ‘I hope you will let Flynn go’ to Comey? Pragmatics & Society, 9(2), 208–231.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (1980). The language of sisterhood. In Michaels, L. and Ricks, C., eds., The State of the Language. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 226–234.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (2003). The grammar of talk: Spoken English, grammar and the classroom. In New Perspectives on English in the Classroom. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Channell, J. (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, C. (2008). A case study on the grammaticalization of adverbs of quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the conference New Reflections on Grammaticalization 4, Leuven, July. http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.be/nrg4/_pdf/chencj.pdf.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. (2007). The use of vague language across spoken genres in an intercultural Hong Kong corpus. In Cutting, J., ed., Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–181.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. & O’Keeffe, A. (2015). Vagueness. In Rühlemann, C. & Aijmer, K., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 360–378.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. & Warren, M. (2001). The use of vague language in intercultural conversations in Hong Kong. English World-Wide, 22(1), 81–104.Google Scholar
Cheng, W. & Warren, M. (2003). Indirectness, inexplicitness and vagueness made clearer. Pragmatics, 13(3), 381–400.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(2), 155–193.Google Scholar
Cho, H. Y. & Sands, L. (2011). Gain- and loss-frame sun safety messages and psychological reactance of adolescents. Communication Research Reports, 28, 308–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. In Clark, H. H., ed., Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 107–143.Google Scholar
Clerehan, R. (2014). Quality and usefulness of written communication for patients. In Chou, W.-Y. & Hamilton, H., eds, The Routledge Handbook of Language and Health Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 212–217.Google Scholar
Clerehan, R. & Buchbinder, R. (2006). Towards a more valid account of functional text quality: The case of the patient information leaflet. Text & Talk, 26, 37–68.Google Scholar
Clerehan, R., Buchbinder, R. & Moodie, J. A. (2005). Linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: Its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis. Health Education Research, 20, 334–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clerehan, R., Hirsh, D. & Buchbinder, R. (2009). Medication information leaflets for patients: The further validation of an analytic linguistic framework. Communication and Medicine, 6(2), 117–127.Google Scholar
Cocco, A. M., Zordan, R., Taylor, D. M., Weiland, T. J., Dilley, S. J., Kant, J., Dombagolla, M., Hendarto, A., Lai, F. & Hutton, J. (2018). Dr. Google in the ED: Searching for online health information by adult emergency department patients. The Medical Journal of Australia, 209(8), 342–347.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. & Biber, D. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Hunston, S. & Thompson, G., eds., Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrales, D. M., Wells, A. E., Breitkopf, C. R., Pena, G., Kaplan, A. L., King, L. S., Robazetti, S. C. & Dinh, T. A. (2018). Internet use by gynecologic oncology patients and its relationship with anxiety. Journal of Health Communication, 23(3), 299–305.Google Scholar
Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161.Google Scholar
Crawford, T., Roger, P. & Candlin, S. (2018). The consequences of diverse empathic responses in nurse-patient interactions: A discourse analysis. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 11(2), 87–94.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Crouch, M. A., Davis, T. C., Miller, S. & Wills, G. (1990). The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. Journal of Family Practice, 31(5), 533–538.Google Scholar
Cruse, A. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & Davy, D. (1979). Advanced Conversational English (8th ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (2000). Analysing the Language of Discourse Communities. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (2007). Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (2012). Vague language in conference abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 283–293.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (2015). Dingsbums und so: Beliefs about German vague language. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 108–121.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (2019). German, Spanish and Mandarin speakers’ attitudes to vague language compared. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danisch, R. & Mudry, J. (2008). Is it safe to eat that? Raw oysters, risk assessment and the rhetoric of science. Social Epistemology, 22(2), 129–143.Google Scholar
Davies, P., Peacock, C. & Scullard, P. (2010). Googling children’s health: Reliability of medical advice on the Internet. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95, 580–582.Google Scholar
De Pablos-Ortega, C. & Pounds, G. (2015). Patient-centred communication in British, Italian and Spanish ‘Ask-the-Expert’ healthcare websites. Communication & Medicine, 12(2–3), 225–241.Google Scholar
Dean, M. (2016). ‘It’s not if I get cancer, it’s when I get cancer’: BRCA positive patients’ (un)certain health experiences regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk. Social Science & Medicine, 163, 21–27.Google Scholar
Delorme, D. E., Huh, J. & Reid, L. N. (2006). Age differences in how consumers behave following exposure to DTC advertising. Health Communication, 20(3), 255–265.Google Scholar
des Bordes, J. K. A., Suarez-Almazor, M. E., Volk, R. J., Lu, H., Edwards, B. & Lopez-Olivo, M. A. (2017). Online educational tool to promote bone health in cancer survivors. Journal of Health Communication, 22(10), 808–817.Google Scholar
Dines, E. R. (1980). Variation in discourse – ‘and stuff like that’. Language in Society, 9, 13–31.Google Scholar
Ediger, A. (1995). Joanna Channell: Vague language [Review of the book Vague Language by J. Channell]. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evison, J., McCarthy, M. & O’Keeffe, A. (2007). ‘Looking out for love and all the rest of it’: Vague category markers as shared social space. In Cutting, J., ed., Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 138–157.Google Scholar
Fele, G. (2014). Requesting help with null or limited knowledge entitlements and responsibility in emergency calls. In Zuczkowski, A., Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I. & Canestrari, C., eds., Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
Fiksdal, A. S., Kumbamu, A., Jadhav, A. S., Cocos, C., Nelsen, L. A., Pathak, J. & McCormick, J. B. (2014). Evaluating the process of online health information searching: A qualitative approach to exploring consumer perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(10), e224.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1976). Frame Semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 20–32.Google Scholar
Folkman, S., Schaefer, C. & Lazarus, R. S. (1979). Cognitive processes as mediators of stress and coping. In Hamilton, V. & Warburton, D. M., eds., Human Stress and Cognition. An Information Processing Approach. New York: Wiley, pp. 265–298.Google Scholar
Fox, S. & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. [Internet]. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4(4), 341–350.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The theory of affordances. In Gibson, J. J., ed., The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 127–137.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Reckoning with Risk: Learning to Live with Uncertainty. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Glinert, L. (2010). Apologizing to China: Elastic apologies and the meta-discourse of American diplomats. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(1), 47–74.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gooden, R. J. & Winefield, H. R. (2007). Breast and prostate cancer online discussion boards: A thematic analysis of gender differences and similarities. Journal of Health Psychology, 12(1), 103–114.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Guan, B. (2010). Collective behaviour and gender difference: Examples from vague language (in Chinese). Contemporary Language Studies, 12, 35–38.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Issues in cross-cultural communication research. In Gudykunst, W. B., ed., Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 149–161.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. & Kim, Y. Y. (1984). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. & Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Cross-cultural variability in communication in personal relationships. In, W. B. Gudykunst, S. Ting-Toomey & Nishida, T., eds., Communication in Personal Relationships Across Cultures. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 19–56.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in A Social-Semiotic Perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haluza, D., Naszay, M., Stockinger, A. & Jungwirth, D. (2017). Digital natives versus digital immigrants: Influence of online health information seeking on the doctor–patient relationship. Health Communication, 32(11), 1342–1349.Google Scholar
Hamilton, H. E. & Chou, W.-Y. S. (2014a). Introduction: Health communication as applied linguistics. In Hamilton, H. E. & Chou, W.-Y. S., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language and Health Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Hamilton, H. E. & Chou, W.-Y. S. (2014b). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Health Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Han, J. Y., Hawkins, R., Baker, T., Shah, D. V., Pingree, S. & Gustafson, D. H. (2017). How cancer patients use and benefit from an interactive cancer communication system. Journal of Health Communication, 22(10), 792–799.Google Scholar
Han, P. K. J., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Duarte, C. W., Knaus, M., Black, A., Scherer, A. M. & Fagerlin, A. (2018). Communication of scientific uncertainty about a novel pandemic health threat: Ambiguity aversion and its mechanisms. Journal of Health Communication, 23(8), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haugh, M. (2016). Prompting social action as a higher-order pragmatic act. In: Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskes, I., eds., Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 167–90.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. & Culpeper, J. (2018). Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Ilie, C. & Norrick, N. R., eds., Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series 294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 213–239.Google Scholar
He, W. & Pan, X.-D. (2015). A functional study of the Chinese function word deng from the perspective of the Cardiff Grammar. Foreign Language Research, 184(3), 22–28.Google Scholar
Heath, C. (1986). Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennemann, S., Beutel, M. E. & Zwerenz, R. (2017). Ready for eHealth? Health professionals’ acceptance and adoption of eHealth interventions in inpatient routine care. Journal of Health Communication, 22(3), 274–284.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. & Maynard, D. W. (2006a). Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. & Maynard, D. W. (2006b). Problems and prospects in the study of doctor–patient interaction: 30 years of research in primary care. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 351–374.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1979). Value systems in forty countries: Interpretation, validation, and consequences for theory. In Eckensberger, L. H., Lonner, W. J. & Poortinga, Y. H., eds., Cross-Cultural Contributions to Psychology. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger, pp. 389–407.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1983). National culture revisited. Behavior Science Research, 18(4), 285–305.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, J. G. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8(3), 345–365.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1988). Sort of in New Zealand women’s and men’s speech. Studia Linguistica, 42(2), 85–121.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language and Communication, 10(3), 185–205.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hong, T. (2012). Examining the role of exposure to incongruent messages on the effect of message framing in an internet health search. Communication Research, 41(2), 159–179.Google Scholar
Hsieh, C.-Y. C. (2019). Linguistic typology, language modality, and stuff like that: A corpus-based study on the general extender zhilei(de) ‘of that kind’ in spoken and written Chinese. Studies in Language, 43(1), 92–119.Google Scholar
Hwang, Y., Cho, H. Y., Sands, L. & Jeong, S. H. (2012). Effects of gain- and loss-framed messages on the sun safety behavior of adolescents: The moderating role of risk perceptions. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(6), 929–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyland, K. (1996). Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum. System, 24(4), 477–490.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1998a). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, 18(3), 349–382.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1998b). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179–197.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, T. & Sturtevant, W. C., eds., Anthropology and Human Behavior. Washington, DC: Anthropology Society of Washington, pp. 13–53.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In Psathas, G., ed., Interaction Competence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. W. (2014). Emotion in languaging: Languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(720), 1–14.Google Scholar
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2018). Discourse Analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2013). Health and Risk Communication: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., Smith, S. W. & Lüdge, T. (2003). Interactional strategy: Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1737–1769.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinnen, E. (2003). Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on ‘I think’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinnen, E. (2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk, 26, 699–731.Google Scholar
Kay, P. (2004). Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In Horn, L. R. & Ward, G., eds., The Handbook of Pragmatics. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 675–700.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2010). Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2889–2897.Google Scholar
Kline, K. N. (2007). Cultural sensitivity and health promotion: Assessing breast cancer education pamphlets designed for African American women. Health Communication, 21(1), 85–96.Google Scholar
Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Hoskins, L. M., Ersig, A. L., Kuhn, N. R., Loud, J. T. & Greene, M. H. (2009). Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: Implications for family health communication interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2203–2209.Google Scholar
Koester, A. (2007). ‘About twelve thousand or so’: Vagueness in North American and UK offices. In Cutting, J., ed., Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 40–61.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. & Presser, S. (2010). Questionnaire design. In Wright, J. D. & Marsden, P. V., eds., Handbook of Survey Research (2nd ed.). Bingley: Emerald, pp. 263–314.Google Scholar
Lagan, B. M., Sinclair, M. & Kernohan, W. (2010). Internet use in pregnancy informs women’s decision making: A web-based survey. Birth, 37(2), 106–115.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Layder, D. (2013). Doing Excellent Small-Scale Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Le, N. & Zhang, G. (2018). Vague Language, Elasticity Theory and the Use of ‘Some’. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lee, S. A. & Zuercher, R. J. (2017). A current review of doctor–patient computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 10(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning, 50(4), 675–724.Google Scholar
Levey, S. (2012). General extenders and grammaticalization: Insights from London preadolescents. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 257–281.Google Scholar
Li, C. & Thompson, S. (1979). Third-person pronouns and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse. In Givón, T., ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12, Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 311–355.Google Scholar
Li, C. & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lim, N.-E. (2011). From subjectivity to intersubjectivity: Epistemic marker wo juede in Chinese. In Xiao, Y., Tao, L. & Soh, H. L., eds., Current Issues in Chinese Linguistics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 265–300.Google Scholar
Lim, N.-E. & Hong, H. Q. (2012). Intensifiers as stance markers: A corpus study on genre variations in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese Language & Discourse, 3(2), 129–166.Google Scholar
Lippincott, G. (2004). Gray matters: Where are the technical communicators in research and design for aging audiences? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(3), 157–170.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. (2010). Health Internet sites: A linguistic perspective on health advice columns. Social Semiotics, 20(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2016). Implicits as evolved persuaders. In In Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskes, I., eds., Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 724–748.Google Scholar
Lumpkins, C. Y., Mabachi, N., Lee, J., Pacheco, C., Greiner, K. A. & Geana, M. (2017). A prescription for Internet access: Appealing to middle-aged and older racial and ethnic minorities through social network sites to combat colorectal cancer. Health Communication, 32(7), 916–920.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maertens, J. A., Jimenez-Zambrano, A. M., Albright, K. & Dempsey, A. F. (2017). Using community engagement to develop a web-based intervention for Latinos about the HPV vaccine. Journal of Health Communication, 22(4), 285–293.Google Scholar
Major, L. H. (2009). Break it to me harshly: The effects of intersecting news frames on lung cancer and obesity coverage. Journal of Health Communication, 14(2), 174–188.Google Scholar
Major, L. H. (2018). Mental health news: How frames influence support for policy and civic engagement intentions. Journal of Health Communication, 23(1), 52–60.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Hunston, S. & Thompson, G., eds., Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142–175.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mashiach, R., Seidman, G. I. & Seidman, D. S. (2002). Use of mifepristone as an example of conflicting and misleading medical information on the Internet. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109(4), 437–442.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1997). The Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, A. (2013). Why social media matters in your medical practice. www.physicianspractice.com/view/why-social-media-matters-your-medical-practice.Google Scholar
Metsä-Ketelä, M. (2016). Pragmatic vagueness: Exploring general extenders in English as a lingua franca. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(3), 325–351.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2013). The well-timed speech act: Bourrée for Bache, RASK: International Journal of Language and Communication, 38, 265–278.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2016a). Practs and facts. In Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskes, I., eds., Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 239–248.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2016b). Pragmatics seen through the prism of society. In Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskese, I., eds., Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham Switzerland: Springer, pp. 105–132.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2016c). Why we need the pragmeme, or: Speech acting and its peripeties. In Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskes, I., eds., Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 133–140.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 345–353.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M. & Mangan, C. E. (1983). Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: Should the doctor tell all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 223–236.Google Scholar
Mo, P. K. H., Malik, S. H. & Coulson, N. S., (2009). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: A systematic literature review of online health-related support groups. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(1), 16–24.Google Scholar
Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multi-method research design. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C., eds., Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 189–208.Google Scholar
Moxey, L. & Sanford, A. (1993). Communicating Quantities – A Psychological Perspective. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Muijs, D. (2011). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Munné, F. (2013). The fuzzy complexity of language. In Massip-Bonet, A. & Bastardas-Boada, A., eds., Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication and Society. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
Murphy, B. (2010). Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Musambira, G. W., Hastings, S. O. & Hoover, J. D. (2006). Bereavement, gender, and cyberspace: A content analysis of parents’ memorials to their children. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 54(4), 263–279.Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1996). Strategic vagueness in academic writing. In Ventola, E. & Mauranen, A., eds., Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues. Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series 41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Neelapala, P., Duvvi, S. K., Kumar, G. & Kumar, B. N. (2008). Do gynaecology outpatients use the Internet to seek health information? A questionnaire survey. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(2), 300–304.Google Scholar
Neely, L. (2014). Risk communication in social media. In Arvai, J. & Riveres, L., eds., Effective Risk Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 143–164.Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. H., Smets, E. M. A., Bol, N., Loos, E. F. & Van Weert, J. C. M. (2018). How tailoring the mode of information presentation influences younger and older adults’ satisfaction with health websites. Journal of Health Communication, 23(2), 170–180.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Perry, K. & Burgess, M. (2002). Communication and Cancer Care. Malden: BPS Blackwell.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, D. J. & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. (2004). Like the wise virgins and all that jazz: Using a corpus to examine vague language and shared knowledge. Language and Computers, 52(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Odebunmi, A. (2006). A pragmatic reading of Ahmed Yerima’s proberbs in Yemoja, Attahiru, and Dry Leaves on Ukan Trees. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(2), 153–169.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Ordóñez-López, P. & Edo-Marzá, N. (2016). Medical Discourse in Professional, Academic and Popular Settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (2005). And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1845–1864.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (2011). Vagueness and hedging. In Andersen, G. & Aijmer, K., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics: Pragmatics of Society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 293–318.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (2014). The role of pragmatic function in the grammaticalization of English general extenders. Pragmatics, 24(1), 105–129.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. & Yule, G. (1997). Locally contingent categorization in discourse. Discourse Processes, 23, 83–97.Google Scholar
Paige, S. R., Krieger, J. L. & Stellefson, M. L. (2017). The Influence of eHealth literacy on perceived trust in online health communication channels and sources. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 53–65.Google Scholar
Palacios Martínez, I. (2011). ‘I might, I might go I mean it depends on money things and stuff’. A preliminary analysis of general extenders in British teenagers’ discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2452–2470.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55–75.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. (2015). Vague language that is vague in both L1 and L2: A comment on Gassner (2012). International Review of Pragmatics, 7(1), 129–143.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. (2017a). Introduction: Death, dying and the pragmeme. In Parvaresh, V. V. & Capone, A., eds., The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 13. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. (2017b). Book review: Grace Q Zhang, Elastic language: How and why we stretch our words. Discourse Studies, 19(1), 115–117.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. (2018). ‘We are going to do a lot of things for college tuition’: Vague language in the 2016 US presidential debates. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 167–192.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. & Capone, A. (2017). The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. & Tayebi, T. (2014). Vaguely speaking in Persian. Discourse Processes, 51(7), 565–600.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V. & Zhang, G., eds., (2019). Vagueness and Elasticity of ‘Sort of’ in TV Discussion Discourse in the Asian Pacific. Special issue of Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.29.1.Google Scholar
Parvaresh, V., Tavanger, M., Eslami, A. & Izadi, D. (2012). About his friend, how good she is and this and that: General extenders in native Persian and non-native English discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 261–279.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Paugh, A. & Izquierdo, C. (2009). Why is this a battle every night? Negotiating food and eating in American dinnertime interaction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(2), 185–204.Google Scholar
Payne, S., Large, S., Jarrett, N. & Turner, P. (2000). Written information given to patients and families by palliative care units: A national survey. The Lancet, 355, 1792.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S. & Leudar, I. (2008). Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pichler, H. & Levey, S. (2011). In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: General extenders in north-east England. English Language and Linguistics, 14(3), 441–471.Google Scholar
Potter, J., Wetherell, M. & Chitty, A. (1991). Quantification rhetoric: Cancer on television. Discourse and Society, 2, 333–365.Google Scholar
Pounds, G. (2018). Patient-centred communication in ask-the-expert healthcare websites. Applied Linguist, 39(2), 117–134.Google Scholar
Powell, M. J. (1985). Purposive vagueness: An evaluative dimension of vague quantifying expressions. Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 31–50.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J. (2001). Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F., Frader, J. & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician–physician discourse. In Pietro, R. D., ed., Linguistics and the Professions: Proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
Pullen, S., Golden, M. A. & Cacciatore, J. (2012). ‘I’ll never forget those cold words as long as I live’: Parent perceptions of death notification for stillbirth. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 8(4), 339–55.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, J. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ran, Y. P. (2010). Approximative expressions and their loose uses in Chinese. In Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W. & Schneider, S., eds., New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley, UK: Emerald, pp. 165–180.Google Scholar
Rauscher, E. A. (2017). Investigating uncertainty in genetic counseling encounters: Managing information about genetic cancer risk. Journal of Health Communication, 22(11), 896–904.Google Scholar
Ravert, R. D., Hancock, M. D. & Ingersoll, G. M. (2004). Online forum messages posted by adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 30(5), 827–834.Google Scholar
Rifkin, E., Bouwer, E. & Sheff, B. (2006). The Illusion of Certainty: Health Benefits and Risks. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Rising, C. J., Bol, N., Burke-Garcia, A., Rains, S. & Wright, K. B. (2017). Perceived stress in online prostate cancer community participants: Examining relationships with stigmatization, social support network preference, and social support seeking. Journal of Health Communication, 22(6), 469–476.Google Scholar
Ritterband, L. M., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Cox, D. J., Clifton, A. D., West, R. W. & Borowitz, S. M. (2003). Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the future. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 34(5), 527–534.Google Scholar
Rothman, A. J. & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J. & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, 202–220.Google Scholar
Rowland, T. (2007). Well maybe not exactly, but it’s around fifty basically? Vague language in mathematics classrooms. In Cutting, J., ed., Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Ruck, K., Cooper, A., Hurley, A., Ashton, K., Lines, C. & Willson, A. (2017). Effective messages and media for employee health campaigns. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 10(3), 180–187.Google Scholar
Russell, B. J. & Ward, A. M. (2011). Deciding what information is necessary: Do patients with advanced cancer want to know all the details? Cancer Management and Research, 3, 191–199.Google Scholar
Ruzaitè, J. (2004). Academic precision reconsidered: A corpus-based account. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 17, 217–247.Google Scholar
Ruzaitė, J. (2007). Vague Language in Educational Settings: Quantifiers and Approximators in British and American English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1977). Truth and approximations. Berkeley Linguistic Society Papers, 3, 430–439.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, C., Plejert, C. & Anward, J. (2014). Defusing practices as mitigation in speech and language intervention. Communication & Medicine, 11(3), 299–312.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. (2004). Towards a communicative mentality in medical and healthcare practice. Communication & Medicine, 1(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. & Clarke, A. (2002). Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 139–171.Google Scholar
Scherr, C. L., Dean, M., Clayton, M. F., Hesse, B. W., Silk, K., StreetJr., R. L. & Krieger, J. (2017). A research agenda for communication scholars in the precision medicine era. Journal of Health Communication, 22(10), 839–848.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139–157.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, M. & Consten, M. (2011). Reference and anaphora. In Bublitz, W. & Norrick, N. R., eds., Handbooks of Pragmatics, vol.1, Foundations of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 347–372.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, Speech Acts. Academic Press, New York, pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Segal, J. Z. (2005). Health and The Rhetoric of Medicine. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Sharkey, S., Smithson, J., Hewis, E., Jones, R. B., Emmens, T., Ford, T. J. & Owens, C. (2012). Supportive interchanges and face-work as ‘protective talk’ in an online self-harm support forum. Communication & Medicine, 9(1), 71–82.Google Scholar
Shirato, J. & Stapleton, P. (2007). Comparing English vocabulary in a spoken learner corpus with a native speaker corpus: Pedagogical implications arising from an empirical study in Japan. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 393–412.Google Scholar
Sigurd, B. (1988). Round numbers. Language in Society, 17, 243–252.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In Basso, K. H. & Selby, H. A., eds., Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11–55.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, J. A., ed., Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–58.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C. (2004). Formulaic expressions in academic speech. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton, eds. Discourse in the Professions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P. & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. (1991). Illness as Metaphor: AIDS and Its Metaphors. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Southwell, B. G. (2010). On the need for a life-span approach to health campaign evaluation. Health Communication, 25(6–7), 525–528.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Spencer-Oatey, H., ed., Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum, pp. 11–46.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995 [1986]). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Staples, S. (2015). The Discourse of Nurse-Patient Interactions: Contrasting the Communicative Styles of US and International Nurses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stenström, A. B., Andersen, G. & Hasund, I. K. (2002). Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Strekalova, Y. A. & Krieger, J. L. (2017). Beyond words: Amplification of cancer risk communication on social media. Journal of Health Communication, 22(10), 849–857.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1981). Language and Literacy: The Sociolinguistics of Reading and Writing. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1986). A matter of prolonged fieldwork: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered Discourses. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Switzerland.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & Denis, D. (2010). The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada. Journal of English Linguistics, 38, 335–368.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Terraschke, A. & Holmes, J. (2007). ‘Und Tralala’: Vagueness and general extenders in German and New Zealand English. In Cutting, J., ed., Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 198–220.Google Scholar
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23, 210–245.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. L., Parrott, R. & Nussbaum, J. F., eds., (2011). The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thon, F. M. & Jucks, R. (2017). Believing in expertise: How authors’ credentials and language use influence the credibility of online health information. Health Communication, 32(7), 828–836.Google Scholar
Trappes-Lomax, H. (2007). Vague language as a means of self-protective avoidance: Tension management in conference talks. In Cutting, J., ed., Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 117–137.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In Berman, J., ed., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 41–133.Google Scholar
Tsai, W.-T. D. (2003). Three types of existential quantification in Chinese. In Li, A. & Simpson, A., eds., Functional Structure(s), Form and Interpretation: Perspectives from East Asian Languages. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 161–179.Google Scholar
Tseng, M.-Y. (2010). The pragmatic act of fishing for personal details: From choice to performance. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1982–1996.Google Scholar
Tseng, M.-Y. (2021). Toward a cognitive-pragmatic account of metonymic schemes of thought: Examples from online medical consultation. Journal of Pragmatics, 173, 177–188.Google Scholar
Tseng, M.-Y. & Zhang, G. (2018). Pragmeme, adaptability, and elasticity in online medical consultations. Journal of Pragmatics, 137, 40–56.Google Scholar
Tseng, M.-Y. & Zhang, G. (2020). Perceptions of and attitudes toward elastic language in online health communication in Chinese. Lingua, 233, 1–24.Google Scholar
Tseng, M.-Y. & Zhang, G. (2022). Conceptual metonymy and emotive-affective meaning at the interface: Examples from online medical consultations. Lingua, 268, article no. 103192, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103192.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.Google Scholar
Uhlirovà, L. (1994). E-mail as a new subvariety of medium and its effects upon the message. In Čmejrková, S. & Štícha, F., eds., The Syntax of Sentence and Text: A Festschrift for František Daneš. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 273–282.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 177–200.Google Scholar
Vasilescu, A. (2016). Towards a ‘theory of everything’ in human communication. In Allan, K., Capone, A. & Kecskes, I., eds., Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 305–333.Google Scholar
Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M. & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: A reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 713–728.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (2017). The pragmatics of humor in a serious story. ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante, 31, 311–326.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. & Brisard, F. (2009). Adaptability. In Verschueren, J. & Östman, J.-O., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights, vol. 1, Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 28–47.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B., Jang, J. W. & Edwards, A. A. H. (2018). Evaluating health advice in a web 2.0 environment: The impact of multiple user-generated factors on HIV advice perceptions. Health Communication, 33(1), 57–67.Google Scholar
Wang, H. (2003). On fuzzy language and its pragmatic functions. Foreign Language Education, 3(2), 9–12.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westerman, D., Spence, P. R. & Van Der Heide, B. (2012). A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 199–206.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. In Asher, R. & Simpson, S., eds., The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 4869–4871.Google Scholar
Willis, E. & Royne, M. B. (2017). Online health communities and chronic disease self-management. Health Communication, 32(3), 269–278.Google Scholar
Wong, T. P. (2010). The pure way to create lean and excellent organizations. International Journal of Existential Psychology & Psychotherapy, 3(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
WrightII, J. W. & Hosman, L. A. (1983). Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: The effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression information. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 48(2), 137–152.Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Wang, J. & Zhou, C. (2010). The use of ‘I think’ by Chinese EFL learners: A study revisited. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
Yan, J., Wei, J., Zhao, D., Vinnikova, A., Li, L. & Wang, S. (2018). Communicating online diet-nutrition information and influencing health behavioral intention: The role of risk perceptions, problem recognition, and situational motivation. Journal of Health Communication, 23(7), 624–633.Google Scholar
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zayts, O., Sarangi, S. & Schnurr, S. (2016). The management of diagnostic uncertainty and decision-making in genetics case conferences. Communication & Medicine, 13(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2011). Elasticity of vague language. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 571–599.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2013). The impact of touchy topics on vague language use. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 23(1), 87–118.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2015). Elastic Language: How and Why We Stretch Our Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2016). How elastic a little can be and how much a little can do in Chinese. Chinese Language and Discourse, 7(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2019). The pragmatic use of ‘sort of’ in TV forums: A Chinese perspective. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 29(1), 62–85.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2020). Vague language challenged: Australian customs encounters. International Review of Pragmatics, 12(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. & Feng, H. (2013). The sensitivity of conversational topics and vague language in Mandarin Chinese. Contemporary Linguistics, 15(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. & Sabet, P. G. P. (2016). Elastic ‘I think’: Stretching over L1 and L2. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 334–353.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. & Tseng, M.-Y. (2020). Attitudes towards elastic language in Australian online healthcare communication. Internet Pragmatics, 3(1), 34–63.Google Scholar
Zhang, R. H. (2010). The development of fuzzy linguistics in China over the past 30 years. Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University, 17(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Zhao, X. (2010). Investigating the Use of Vague Language as a Communicative Strategy in Chinese Business Negotiations. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Curtin University, Australia.Google Scholar
Zhou, F. F. & Zhang, Y. J. (2018). Wǎngluò huìhuà jiāojì zhōng móhú wēi yǔyán shèhuì yǔ yòng gōngnéng yánjiū (in Chinese) [Research on the social pragmatic function of fuzzy micro-language in Internet conversational communication]. Meiji Wenhua [Media Culture], 23, 60–64.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J., eds., Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 359–469.Google Scholar
Zummo, M. L. (2015). Exploring web-mediated communication: A genre-based linguistic study for new patterns of doctor–patient interaction in online environment. Communication & Medicine, 12(2–3), 187–198.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Grace Qiao Zhang, Curtin University, Perth, Ming-Yu Tseng
  • Book: Elasticity in Healthcare Communication
  • Online publication: 04 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903134.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Grace Qiao Zhang, Curtin University, Perth, Ming-Yu Tseng
  • Book: Elasticity in Healthcare Communication
  • Online publication: 04 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903134.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Grace Qiao Zhang, Curtin University, Perth, Ming-Yu Tseng
  • Book: Elasticity in Healthcare Communication
  • Online publication: 04 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903134.014
Available formats
×