Book contents
- Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries
- Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Evolution, Taxonomy, and Domestication
- Part II Species Accounts
- Part III Conservation and Management
- 26 Conservation of Wild Pigs and Peccaries
- 27 Modelling Pygmy Hog Habitat to Inform Habitat Management
- 28 Introduced Wild Pigs in North America: History, Problems and Management
- 29 Biological Invasion of Wild Boar and Feral Pigs Sus scrofa (Suidae) in South America: Review and Mapping with Implications for Conservation of Peccaries (Tayassuidae)
- 30 Feral Pigs in Australia and New Zealand: Range, Trend, Management, and Impacts of an Invasive Species
- 31 Wild Boar Management in Europe: Knowledge and Practice
- 32 Resolving Conflict Between Farmers and Wild Boar in Europe and Northern Asia
- 33 Human Dimensions of Wild Boar: The Need to Include People in Decision-making Processes
- 34 A Genomic Perspective on Wild Boar Demography and Evolution
- 35 Disease Transmission at the Interface between Wild and Domestic Suiform Species in the Old and New Worlds
- 36 Ecological Impact of Wild Boar in Natural Ecosystems
- 37 Ex-situ Conservation of Wild Pigs and Peccaries: Roles, Status, Management Successes and Challenges
- 38 Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Boar in Europe: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges
- Index
- References
27 - Modelling Pygmy Hog Habitat to Inform Habitat Management
from Part III - Conservation and Management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2017
Book contents
- Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries
- Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Evolution, Taxonomy, and Domestication
- Part II Species Accounts
- Part III Conservation and Management
- 26 Conservation of Wild Pigs and Peccaries
- 27 Modelling Pygmy Hog Habitat to Inform Habitat Management
- 28 Introduced Wild Pigs in North America: History, Problems and Management
- 29 Biological Invasion of Wild Boar and Feral Pigs Sus scrofa (Suidae) in South America: Review and Mapping with Implications for Conservation of Peccaries (Tayassuidae)
- 30 Feral Pigs in Australia and New Zealand: Range, Trend, Management, and Impacts of an Invasive Species
- 31 Wild Boar Management in Europe: Knowledge and Practice
- 32 Resolving Conflict Between Farmers and Wild Boar in Europe and Northern Asia
- 33 Human Dimensions of Wild Boar: The Need to Include People in Decision-making Processes
- 34 A Genomic Perspective on Wild Boar Demography and Evolution
- 35 Disease Transmission at the Interface between Wild and Domestic Suiform Species in the Old and New Worlds
- 36 Ecological Impact of Wild Boar in Natural Ecosystems
- 37 Ex-situ Conservation of Wild Pigs and Peccaries: Roles, Status, Management Successes and Challenges
- 38 Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Boar in Europe: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries , pp. 291 - 298Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Austin, M. (2007). Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. & Oliver, W. (1991). The burning question and other problems relating to tall grassland management and the conservation of endangered species in the northern Indian sub-continent. Tropical Ecology.Google Scholar
Bell, D., Oliver, W. & Ghose, R. (1990). The hispid hare Caprolagus hispidus. In Chapman, J. A. & Flux, J. E. C. (eds.), Rabbits, hares and pikas: status survey and conservation action plan. Gland: IUCN, pp. 128–136.Google Scholar
Brown, J. L. (2009). SDMtoolbox: a python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5(7): 694–700.Google Scholar
Choudhury, A. (1998). Survey of grasslands in some parts of central and southern Assam: to assess their bio-diversity and socio-economic problem. Final report to WWF-India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Choudhury, A. (2002). Distribution and conservation of the Gaur Bos gaurus in the Indian Subcontinent. Mammal Review 32(3): 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormann, C. F., McPherson, J. M., Araújo, M. B., et al. (2007). Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30(5): 609–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elith, J., Phillips, S.J., Hastie, T., et al. (2011). A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17(1): 43–57.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. L. & Traylor, M. A. (1964). Further notes on Nepal birds. Chicago, IL: Chicago Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
Funk, S. M., Verma, S. K., Larson, G., et al. (2007). The pygmy hog is a unique genus: 19th century taxonomists got it right first time round. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45(2): 427–436.Google Scholar
Graham, C. H., Ferrier, S., Huettman, F., Moritz, C. & Peterson, A. T. (2004). New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19(9): 497–503.Google Scholar
Groves, C. P. (1981). Ancestors for the pigs: taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Sus. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. (1990). The hierarchical structure of utterances. In Nuyts, J. (ed.), Layers and levels of representation in language theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Hodgson, B. (1847). On a new form of the hog kind or Suidae. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 16: 423–428.Google Scholar
IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Union internationale pour la conservation de la nature & de ses ressources. Re-introduction Specialist Group. (1998). IUCN guidelines for re-introductions. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.Google Scholar
Jnawali, S., Baral, H., Lee, S., et al. (2011). The status of Nepal mammals: the national Red List series, with preface by Simon M. Stuart, Chair IUCN Species Survival Commission. Nepal: Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Kinloch (Colonel) (1885). Large game shooting in Thibet, The Himalayas, and Northern India. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co.Google Scholar
Lomolino, M. V. H. & Lawrence, R. (eds.) (2004). Frontiers of biogeography: new directions in the geography of nature. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. (1907). The game animals of India, Burma, Malaya, and Tibet: being a new and revised edition of the great and small game of India, Burma, and Tibet. R. Ward, limited.Google Scholar
Mallinson, J. (1977). Breeding of the pygmy hog Sus salvanius (Hodgson) in northern Assam. Journal of the Bombay National History Society 74: 288–289.Google Scholar
Mellars, P., Gori, K. C., Carr, M., Soares, P. A. & Richards, M. B. (2013). Genetic and archaeological perspectives on the initial modern human colonization of southern Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(26): 10699–10704.Google Scholar
Narayan, G., Oliver, W. L. R. & Deka, P. J. (2008). First captive bred pygmy hogs (Porcula salvania) reintroduced to Sonai Rupai Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India. Suiform Soundings 8(1): 16–26.Google Scholar
Narayan, G., Deka, P. J., Oliver, W. L., Fa, J. E. & Islands, C. (2010). Conservation breeding and re-introduction of the pygmy hog in NW Assam, India. In Soorae, P. S. (ed.), Global re-introduction perspectives: additional case-studies from around the globe. Abu Dhabi: IUCN, p. 290.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. L. (1980). The pigmy hog: the biology and conservation of the pigmy hog and the hispid hare. Special Scientific Report.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. (1984). The distribution and status of the hispid hare Caprolagus hispidus the summarised findings of the 1984 pigmy hog/hispid hare field survey in northern Bangladesh, southern Nepal and northern India. Dodo, Journal of the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust 21: 6–32.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. L. (1985). The distribution and status of the hispid hare (Caprolagus hispidus): with some additional notes on the pigmy hog (Sus salvanius). Wildlife Preservation Trust.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. L. (1989). The pigmy hog: the biology and conservation of the pigmy hog, Sus (Porcula) salvanius and the hispid hare, Caprolagus hispidus. Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. (2006). Pygmy hogs in southern Nepal (or news at last on the so-called ‘Hormel Expedition’)? Suiform Soundings 6: 19–22.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. L. R. & Deb Roy, S. (1993). The pygmy hog (Sus salvanius). In Oliver, W. L. R. (ed.), Pigs, peccaries and hippos: status survey and conservation action plan. Gland: IUCN, pp. 121–129.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. L. & Santos, I. B. (1991). Threatened endemic mammals of the Atlantic forest region of south-east Brazil. Jersey: Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust.Google Scholar
Oliver, W., Brisbin, I. & Oliver, W. (1993). Pigs, peccaries and hippos: status survey and action plan. Gland: IUCN World Conservation Union.Google Scholar
Osborne, P. E. & Seddon, P. J. (2012). Selecting suitable habitats for reintroductions: variation, change and the role of species distribution modelling. In Elwen, J. G., Armstrong, D. P., Parker, K. A. & Seddon, P. J. (eds.), Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Phillips, S. J. (2008). Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. Ecography 31(2): 272–278.Google Scholar
Phillips, S. J. & Dudík, M. (2008). Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31(2): 161–175.Google Scholar
Pickford, M. (2013). Suids from the Pleistocene of Naungkwe Taung, Kayin State, Myanmar. Paleontological Research 16(4): 307–317.Google Scholar
Pollok, F. W. T. & Thom, W. S. (1900). Wild sports of Burma and Assam, by Colonel Pollok … and WS Thom.Google Scholar
Rödder, D., Kielgast, J., Bielby, J., et al. (2009). Global amphibian extinction risk assessment for the panzootic chytrid fungus. Diversity 1(1): 52–66.Google Scholar
Sanyal, A. K., De, D. K., Das, R. P. & Venkataraman, K. (2013). Feasibility study regarding re-introduction of pygmy hog (Porcula salvania Hodgson, 1847) at Gorumara National Park, Jalpaigui, West Bengal. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 113(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Sanyal, P. (1995). A new report on pigmy hog Sus salvanius (Hodgson) from West Bengal. Journal of the Bombay National History Society 92(1): 116.Google Scholar
Shrestha, T. & Joshi, R. (1997). Biodiversity gap analysis: terrestrial ecoregions of the Himalaya (Nepal). Report submitted to WWF-Nepal Program, Lal Durbar, Katmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Stiels, D., Schidelko, K., Engler, J.O., van den Elzen, R. & Rödder, D. (2011). Predicting the potential distribution of the invasive Common Waxbill Estrilda astrild (Passeriformes: Estrildidae). Journal of Ornithology 152(30): 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857): 1285.Google Scholar
Thapa, S. (2014). A checklist of mammals of Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 6(8): 6061–6072.Google Scholar
Thuiller, W., Münkemüller, T., Lavergne, S., et al. (2013). A road map for integrating eco-evolutionary processes into biodiversity models. Ecology Letters 16(1): 94–105.Google Scholar
Varela, S., Anderson, R. P., García-Valdés, R. & Fernández-González, F. (2014). Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. Ecography 37(11): 1084–1091.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. J., Araújo, M. B., Jepson, P., et al. (2005). Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions 11(1): 3–23.Google Scholar
Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R., Li, J., et al. (2008). Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distribution 14(5): 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar