Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Notes on the authors and contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction: Why is redesign of public policy needed?
- Chapter One Possibilities for policy design
- Chapter Two Conventional policy design
- Chapter Three Co-productive policy design
- Section One Challenges and change within conventional policy design
- Section Two Vision in co-productive policy design
- Section Three Grammar in co-productive policy design
- Chapter Four Debating co-productive policy design
- Chapter Five Governance for co-productive policy designs
- Epilogue Co-producing research
- References
- Index
Creative disruption for cultural change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Notes on the authors and contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction: Why is redesign of public policy needed?
- Chapter One Possibilities for policy design
- Chapter Two Conventional policy design
- Chapter Three Co-productive policy design
- Section One Challenges and change within conventional policy design
- Section Two Vision in co-productive policy design
- Section Three Grammar in co-productive policy design
- Chapter Four Debating co-productive policy design
- Chapter Five Governance for co-productive policy designs
- Epilogue Co-producing research
- References
- Index
Summary
The author of this contribution is an experienced advocate for the community and voluntary sectors. Here he reflects on his experiences working with local government. Writing as an independent commentator, Toby Blume occupies a position as what could be thought of as a boundary spanner but what he calls a ‘view from the boundary's edge’. This clear-sighted view gives us insight into the human dimensions of working with more incompleteness in a complex policy and delivery environment; business as unusual. This contribution illuminates the scale of change required to translate a co-productive vision into a threedimensional reality. It puts forward examples and ideas of creative disruption techniques used to generate more co-productive relationships.
The case study is of the London Borough of Lambeth, and a story of groundbreaking work to reorientate its work along cooperative principles. It shows an attempt to introduce an explicitly asset-based approach into its decisionmaking processes about what local public services should provide, and how. Toby Blume's reflections on the process document just how much of a cultural shift co-production can be for large public institutions. It illustrates difficult choices about managing large-scale change processes internally and with citizens. The author makes a cogent argument that Lambeth Council's experiences suggest that co-production will need radical transformation not just in new forms of citizen vision and mobilisation – a participatory civic economy – but also across a huge and complex bureaucratic machinery.
Lambeth Council has made clear its intention to become a Cooperative Council – an ambitious plan to redefine the relationship between citizens and the state and place people at the heart of decision making. ‘Sharing Power: A New Settlement between Citizens and the State’ (Lambeth Council, 2011) set out a series of conclusions, principles and recommendation that aimed to fundamentally transform everything the council does and how it does it.
Focus on citizens
Lambeth's Cooperative Council is reframing the way we relate to our communities, by reflecting the untapped potential and latent resources that exist in all communities. This strengths-based approach (or ‘Asset Based Community Development’) seeks to unearth the talents, ambitions and assets within the community. It is an essential requirement of the Cooperative Council vision, where power and decision making is shared and improved local outcomes are achieved through co-design and co-production.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Designing Public Policy for Co-productionTheory, Practice and Change, pp. 91 - 100Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2015