Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on editors and contributors
- Series editors’ introduction
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction to volume two: themes, issues and chapter synopses
- 2 Consent and sexual literacy for older people
- 3 ‘At YOUR age???!!!’: the constraints of ageist erotophobia on older people’s sexual and intimate relationships
- 4 The aesthetic(s) of eroticism in later life
- 5 Menopause and the ‘menoboom’: how older women are desexualised by culture
- 6 Ageing, physical disability and desexualisation
- 7 Ageing, intellectual disability and desexualisation
- 8 Dancing in- or out-of-step? Sexual and intimate relationships among heterosexual couples living with Alzheimer’s disease
- 9 Older people living in long-term care: no place for old sex?
- 10 Ageing and the LGBTI+ community: a case study of Australian care policy
- 11 The role of professionals and service providers in supporting sexuality and intimacy in later life: theoretical and practice perspectives
- 12 Final reflections: themes and issues arising from the volume on desexualisation in later life
- Index
2 - Consent and sexual literacy for older people
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 April 2023
- Frontmatter
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on editors and contributors
- Series editors’ introduction
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction to volume two: themes, issues and chapter synopses
- 2 Consent and sexual literacy for older people
- 3 ‘At YOUR age???!!!’: the constraints of ageist erotophobia on older people’s sexual and intimate relationships
- 4 The aesthetic(s) of eroticism in later life
- 5 Menopause and the ‘menoboom’: how older women are desexualised by culture
- 6 Ageing, physical disability and desexualisation
- 7 Ageing, intellectual disability and desexualisation
- 8 Dancing in- or out-of-step? Sexual and intimate relationships among heterosexual couples living with Alzheimer’s disease
- 9 Older people living in long-term care: no place for old sex?
- 10 Ageing and the LGBTI+ community: a case study of Australian care policy
- 11 The role of professionals and service providers in supporting sexuality and intimacy in later life: theoretical and practice perspectives
- 12 Final reflections: themes and issues arising from the volume on desexualisation in later life
- Index
Summary
Consent is generally regarded as a problem for the young and the inexperienced. The focus of academic literature, sexuality education and legal and cultural debate is upon those who are entering the sexual world, rather than those who are mature within it (selectively, Archard, 1998; Cowling and Reynolds, 2004; Moore and Reynolds, 2016; Popova, 2019; Stryker, 2017). In part, this is a product of the naturalised and normalised developmental model of sex that identifies sexual risk and danger primarily around the young (Moore and Reynolds, 2018, pp 24– 26). It reflects a minimalist notion of sexual learning, regarded as a part of child social development that is adequately completed with maturity. For older people, consent is principally seen as an issue accompanying concerns about diminished capacity. This reflects the desexualisation of older people, where mainstream cultural representations and articulations of sex and sexuality involve stereotypes of youthful, ‘beautiful’, vigorous bodies and acute and rational minds. Older people do not conform to those dominant representations and its stereotypes (Moore and Reynolds, 2016; Hafford-Letchfield et al, 2020, passim; and this volume). Underlying this is a hetero-(and more recently homo-) normative sexuality that is focused on genitocentric, penetrative sexual functionality and in phallocentric vigour and fecundity (in respect of men) (selectively, Beasley, 2005; Jackson and Scott, 2011; Weeks, 2016). This normativity frames older sexual desires as risk and problem oriented, whether the focus is on desexualised older bodies or dysfunctionality, and discourages approaches to older sexual agency that emphasise sexual experimentation and creativity, which might provide different pleasures and alternative and new forms of sexual learning and knowledge. Consent is not an issue because, surely, older people's sexual desires are diminished or absent?
The implications of this are that consent is not seen as a problem because it is displaced by desexualisation and the ‘normal’ conception of the sexual ‘life course’. Older adults are assumed to understand consent (unless they transgress and commit an offence like rape or sexual assault, or they have problems of competence and are deemed as unable to consent).
This chapter will explore some of the relevant issues for older people's consent to sexual activity, both those factors that are shared with younger people and those factors that are more specific to older people.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Desexualisation in Later LifeThe Limits of Sex and Intimacy, pp. 17 - 34Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2021