Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:23:51.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Transatlantic intransigence in the Doha Round: domestic politics and the difficulty of compromise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Amrita Narlikar
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

The Doha Development Round of multilateral trade talks have struggled since they began in November 2001 following a false start in December 1999. Ministerial meetings in Cancun in 2003 and Hong Kong in 2005 did not witness substantial progress. Subsequent smaller and more informal meetings intended to galvanise the negotiations in the summers of 2007 and 2008 also foundered on significant differences among the parties. As of the end of 2009 the negotiations had not been abandoned, but prospects of a rapid resolution appeared remote given the internal preoccupations of a number of the key players. Thus the Doha Round at the time of writing (January 2010) is an example of deadlock, in the form of an ‘extended delay’.

Rather than consider all of the reasons for deadlock in the negotiations, this chapter examines the challenges the negotiations pose for the European Union and the United States and how they have responded to them. The chapter focuses on the EU and the United States because they are the world's largest economies and largest importers and exporters of goods and services. Moreover, the multilateral trading system began as a primarily transatlantic project, and the United States and EU have been the key protagonists in the previous rounds of multilateral trade talks. With the greater assertiveness of emerging country governments – most notably those of Brazil and India and more quietly China – however, the multilateral trading system has become less of a duopoly.

Type
Chapter
Information
Deadlocks in Multilateral Negotiations
Causes and Solutions
, pp. 123 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×