Introduction

Protests mobilize citizens and represent collective action. They give voice to citizens by articulating their demands. They highlight salient concerns in the public domain. Protests are an increasingly popular form of representing grievances and aspirations across the world (The Economist, 2020). According to government data, India clocks more than 300 protests per day. And as the two testimonies in the epigraphs point out, citizens understand the significance of protest politics. This chapter focuses on the study of identity-based protests.

Identity is a popular focal point for protest mobilization because it can be a source of shared interests, grievances, and networks. But do all identity groups turn to identity-based protests to the same degree? Around the world, societies are defined by a variety of structural inequalities. In many instances, these are rooted in ethnic and racial identities. The social and political behaviour of marginalized groups is distinct and can differ from the politics of dominant groups. Still, we know little about how these differences manifest across a variety of forms of politics, including protest activity. For instance, how does the protest behaviour of Blacks compare with that of Whites in the United States and in South Africa, or the protests of indigenous communities compare with those of Whites across Latin America, or the protests of Dalits compare with those of upper castes in India?

In this chapter, we explore Dalit protest activity within the context of hierarchical caste group relations. Specifically, we ask, is the protest activity of Dalits (the lowest ranked group in the caste hierarchy) different from that of the upper castes (the highest ranked group)?