Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 4, 1102–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, M. H., Whitlow, J. F., Stover, L. M., & Johnson, K. W. (1996). Critical thinking as an educational outcome: An evaluation of current tools of measurement. Nurse Educator, 21, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Agarwal, R. & Day, A. E. (1998). The impact of the Internet on economic education. Journal of Economic Education, 29, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R., Feezel, J., & Kauffeld, F. (1967). A taxonomy of concepts and critical abilities related to the evaluation of verbal arguments (Occasional Paper No. 9). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development, Center for Cognitive Learning.Google Scholar

Alvarez-Ortiz, C. (2007). Does Philosophy Improve Critical Thinking Skills? Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (Ed.). (1981). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. 1990. The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D. (1983). A consolidation and appraisal of science meta-analyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. Political Science and Politics, 36, 2, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anicha, C. L., Ode, S., Moeller, S. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2011). Toward a cognitive view of trait mindfulness: Distinct cognitive skills predict its observing and nonreactivity facets. Journal of Personality, 80, 2, 255–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2005). Liberal education outcomes: A preliminary report on student achievement in college. Washington, DC: AAC&U.Google Scholar

Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2010). Raising the bar: Employers’ views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn. Retrieved from the AAC&U website: www.aacu.org/leap.Google Scholar

Athanassiou, N., McNett, J. M., & Harvey, C. (2003). Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom’s taxonomy as a learning tool. Journal of Management Education, 27, 5, 533–555.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 2, 89–195. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Australian Council for Educational Research. (2002). Graduate skills assessment: Stage one validity study. Australia: Dept. of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar

Ayres, P. & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 135–146. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baddeley, A. D., Eldridge, M., & Lewis, V. (1981). The role of subvocalisation in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 4, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 8, 47–90. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. & Wilson, B. A. (2002). Prose recall and amnesia: Implications for the structure of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 43, 4, 583–587.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. Unintended Thought, 3, 51–69.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In Wyer, R. S. (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition, 10, 1–61. UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A. (2002). Losing consciousness: Automatic influences on consumer judgment, behavior, and motivation. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 2, 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baril, P. B., Cunningham, B. M., Fordham, D. R., Gardner, R. L., & Wolcott, S. K. (1998). Critical thinking in the public accounting profession: Aptitudes and attitudes. Journal of Accounting Education, 16, 4, 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barton, K. & McCully, A. (2007). Teaching controversial issues … Where controversial issues really matter. Teaching History, 127, 13.Google Scholar

Basson, A. H. & O’Connor, D. J. (1968). Introduction to symbolic logic. London: University Tutorial Press.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Ego depletion and self-control failure: An energy model of the self’s executive function. Self and Identity, 1, 2, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. (2003). The psychology of irrationality: Why people make foolish, self-defeating choices. The Psychology of Economic Decisions, 1, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1986). Differential aptitude test. Windsor, UK: Psychological Corporation & NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar

Bensley, D. A. (1998). Critical thinking in psychology: A unified skills approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks & Cole.Google Scholar

Bensley, D. A., Crowe, D. S., Bernhardt, P., Buckner, C., & Allman, A. L. (2010). Teaching and assessing critical thinking skills for argument analysis in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, A. (1985). Review of Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. In Mitchell, J. V. (Ed.), Ninth mental measurements yearbook, 1692–1693. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, S. J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students’ memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 2, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bidell, T. R. & Fischer, K. W. (1992). Cognitive development in educational contexts. In Demetriou, A., Efklides, A., & Shayer, M. (Eds.), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Implications and applications for education, 9–29. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 11, 3, 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar

Boekaerts, M. & Simons, P. R. J. (1993). Learning and instruction: Psychology of the pupil and the learning process. Assen: Dekker & van de Vegt.Google Scholar

Boomer, G. (1992). Negotiating the curriculum. In Boomer, G., Lester, N., Onore, C., & Cook, J. (Eds.), Negotiating the curriculum: Educating for the 21st century, 4–13. London: Falmer.Google Scholar

Boyadjian-Samawi, Z. (2006). The effect of concept mapping on critical thinking skills and dispositions of junior and senior baccalaureate nursing students. Doctoral dissertation: Widener University School of Nursing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 47.Google Scholar

Brabeck, M. M. (1981). The relationship between critical thinking skills and development of reflective judgment among adolescent and adult women. Paper presented at the 89th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August 24–26.Google Scholar

Brem, S. K. (2000). Helping students ask effective questions about scientific claims: Navigating the ‘sound bite’ environment. US Department of Education, Research Report 143.Google Scholar

Brewin, C. R. & Smart, L. (2005). Working memory capacity and suppression of intrusive thoughts. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 1, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Reiner, F. & Kluwe, R. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, 65–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brown, K. G. (2001). Using computers to deliver training: Why employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology, 54, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 4, 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckingham-Shum, S. J. (2003). The roots of computer supported argument visualization. In Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham-Shum, S., & Carr, C. (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making, 3–24. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budd, J. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises. Journal of Economic Education, 35, 1, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burbach, M., Matkin, G., & Fritz, S. (2004). Teaching critical thinking in an introductory leadership course utilizing active learning strategies: A confirmatory study. College Student Journal, 38, 3, 482–493.Google Scholar

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010–2011). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010–2011 edition. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/oco/ocos021.htm.Google Scholar

Burton, C. L., Strauss, E., Hultsch, D. F., & Hunter, M. A. (2006). Cognitive functioning and everyday problem solving in older adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 3, 432–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Butchart, S., Bigelow, J., Oppy, G., Korb, K., & Gold, I. (2009). Improving critical thinking using web-based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 2, 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, H. A. (2012). Halpern critical thinking assessment predicts real-world outcomes of critical thinking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 721–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, H., Dwyer, C., Hogan, M., Franco, A., & Almeida, L. (2012). Extending the validity of Halpern critical thinking assessments: Cross-national applications. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 7, 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, T. & Buzan, B. (1997). The mind map book. London: BBC Books.Google Scholar

Cabantous, L., Gond, J. P., & Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010). Decision theory as practice: Crafting rationality in organizations. Organization Studies, 31, 11, 1531–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cader, R., Campbell, S., & Watson, D. (2005). Cognitive continuum theory in nursing decision‐making. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49, 4, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chaffee, J. (1988). Thinking critically (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 4, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, W. G. & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 5–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, C. M. (2009). Personalized e-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5, 8816–8829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In Sternberg, R. S. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 7–77. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Chiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 3, 449–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, R. C. (2005). Multimedia learning in e-courses. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 589–615. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colucciello, M. L. (1997). Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students – A conceptual model for evaluation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 13, 236–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooperative Institutional Research Program. (1995). 1994 Nine Year Follow-Up Survey (of 1985 Freshmen). Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA.Google Scholar

Couch, M. (2012). Approaching critical thinking. In Couch, M. (Ed.), Center for catholic studies, critical thinking: Summer seminars, 10, 8–9. South Orange, NJ: Seton Hall University.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 302, 341–359.Google Scholar

Craik, F. I. M. & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 3, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craik, F. I. M. & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 12, 6, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Antoni, A. V., Zipp, G. P., Olson, V. G., & Cahill, T. F. (2010). Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students? BMC Medical Education, 10, 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daly, W. M. (2001). The development of an alternative method in the assessment of critical thinking as an outcome of nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36, 1, 120–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dane, E. & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In Weinstein, C. E., Goetz, E. T., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction and evaluation, 103–120. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 17, 6889–6892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). How can we teach for meaningful learning? In Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.), Powerful Learning, 1–10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Davies, M. W. (2008). ‘Not quite right’: Helping students to make better arguments. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 3, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, T. L. (2008). Metacognition and learning in adulthood. Northampton, MA: Developmental Testing Service, LLC.Google Scholar

Dawson-Tunik, T. L., Commons, M. L., Wilson, M., & Fischer, K. W. (2005). The shape of development. International Journal of Cognitive Development, 2, 63–196.Google Scholar

De Bono, E. (1967). The use of lateral thinking. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

De Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Dee-Lucas, D. & Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 3, 431–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and mind in chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mounton.Google Scholar

Del Missier, F., Mäntylä, T., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010). Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 2, 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demetriou, A. (2000). Organisation and development of self-understanding and self-regulation: Toward a general theory. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation, 209–251. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1910). How to think. Boston: Heath & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington, MA: Heath & Co.Google Scholar

Dhami, M. K. & Thomson, M. E. (2012). On the relevance of cognitive continuum theory and quasirationality for understanding management judgment and decision making. European Management Journal, 30, 4, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, A., van Gelder, T., & Cumming, G. (2002). Reason! project studies, 1999–2002. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Dragon, T., McLaren, B. M., Mavrikis, M., & Geraniou, E. (2011). Scaffolding collaborative learning opportunities: Integrating microworld use and argumentation. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Adaptive Support for Team Collaboration, held in conjunction with the International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Girona, Spain, July 11–15.Google Scholar

Dressel, P. L. & Mayhew, L. B. (1954). General education: Exploration in education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar

Duchastel, P. C. (1990). Examining cognitive processing in hypermedia usage. Hypermedia, 2, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duff, K., Schoenberg, M. R., Scott, J. G., & Adams, R. L. (2005). The relationship between executive functioning and verbal and visual learning and memory. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 1, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunwoody, P. T., Haarbauer, E., Mahan, R. P., Marino, C., & Tang, C. C. (2000). Cognitive adaptation and its consequences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1, 35–54.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dwyer, C. P. (2011). The evaluation of argument mapping as a learning tool. Doctoral Thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway.Google Scholar

Dwyer, C. P., Harney, O., Hogan, M. J., & O’Reilly, J. (2014). Using interactive management to define and cultivate critical thinking competencies. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62, 687–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dwyer, C. P., Harney, O., Hogan, M. J., & Kavanagh, C. (2016). Facilitating a Student-Educator Conceptual Model of Dispositions towards Critical Thinking through Interactive Management. Educational Technology & Research, doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2011). The promotion of critical thinking skills through argument mapping. In Horvart, C. P. & Forte, J. M. (Eds.), Critical Thinking. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2012). An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 12, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2015). The evaluation of argument mapping-infused critical thinking instruction as a method of enhancing reflective judgment performance. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 16, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engelmann, T., Baumeister, A., Dingel, A., & Hesse, F. W. (2010). The added value of communication in a CSCL-scenario compared to just having access to the partners’ knowledge and information. In Sánchez, J., Cañas, A., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.), Concept maps making learning meaningful: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on concept mapping, 1, 377–384. Viña del Mar, Chile: University of Chile.Google Scholar

Engelmann, T. & Hesse, F. W. (2010). How digital concept maps about the collaborators’ knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Baron, J. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, 9–26. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. (1991). Critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 14, 1, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (1998). Is critical thinking culturally biased? Teaching Philosophy, 21, 1, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, R. (2013). Critical thinking across the curriculum. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 28, 2, 25–45.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H., Millman, J., & Tomko, T. N. (1985). Cornell critical thinking tests. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Co.Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. & Weir, E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir critical thinking essay test. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.Google Scholar

Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ericsson, K. A. & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Facione, P. A. (1990a). The California critical thinking skills test (CCTST): Forms A and B; The CCTST test manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.Google Scholar

Facione, P. A. (1990b). The Delphi report: Committee on pre-college philosophy. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.Google Scholar

Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking, Informal Logic, 20, 1, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Facione, P. A. & Facione, N. C. (1992). The California critical thinking dispositions inventory (CCTDI) and CCTDI Test Manual. California: California Academic Press.Google Scholar

Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., Blohm, S. W., & Giancarlo, C. A. (2002). The California critical thinking skills test: CCTST. Form A, form B, and form 2000. Test manual, 2002 updated edition. Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment.Google Scholar

Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. (1997). Setting expectations for student learning: New directions for higher education. Millbrae: California Academic Press.Google Scholar

Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 33, 8, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36, 426–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fischer, C. G. & Grant, G. E. (1983). Intellectual levels in college classrooms. In Ellner, C. L. & Barnes, C. P. (Eds.), Studies of College Teaching, 47–60. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar

Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, K. W. & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed.), 1, 313–399. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Fisher, A. (1988). The logic of real arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick, L. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence, 231–236. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Folsom-Kovarik, J. T., Schatz, S., Sukthankar, G., & Nicholson, D. (2010). What information does this question convey?: Leveraging help-seeking behavior for improved modeling in a simulation-based intelligent tutor. Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference, Orlando, FL, April 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, T., Grunst, G., & Quast, K. J. (1994). HyPlan: A context-sensitive hypermedia help system. Report No. 743, GMD, St. Augustin, Germany.Google Scholar

Fuster, J. M. (2000). Prefrontal neurons in networks of executive memory. Brain Research Bulletin, 52, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gabbenesch, H. (2006). Critical thinking: What is it good for? (In fact, what is it?). Skeptical Inquirer, 30, 2, 36–41.Google Scholar

Gailliot, M. T. & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Self-regulation and sexual restraint: Dispositionally and temporarily poor self-regulatory abilities contribute to failures at restraining sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gadzella, B. M., Ginther, D. W., & Bryant, G. W. (1996). Teaching and learning critical thinking skills. Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Psychology, Montreal, August 19.Google Scholar

Garcia, T., Pintrich, P. R., & Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking and its relationship to motivation, learning strategies and classroom experience. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, August 14–18.Google Scholar

Gerlach, V. & Sullivan, A. (1967). Constructing statements of outcomes. Inglewood, CA: Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar

Gestsdottir, S. & Lerner, R. M. (2008). Positive development in adolescence: The development and role of intentional self-regulation. Human Development, 51, 3, 202–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaser, E. M. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. New York: Teachers College of Columbia University, Bureau of Publications.Google Scholar

Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., & Yang, T. (2011). Mindfulness at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, 115–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gobet, F. & Clarkson, G. (2004). Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four … or is it two? Memory, 12, 732–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, M. (1990). A quasi-experiment assessing the effectiveness of TV advertising directed to children. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1986). Educational Psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Granello, D. H. (2001). Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: Using Bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40, 4, 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1968). The Greek philosophers from Thales to Aristotle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 1, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2003a). Thought & knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2003b). The ‘how’ and ‘why’ of critical thinking assessment. In Fasko, D. (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current research, theory and practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2006). Is intelligence critical thinking? Why we need a new definition of intelligence. In Kyllonen, P. C., Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (Eds.), Extending intelligence: Enhancement and new constructs, 293–310. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2010a). The Halpern critical thinking assessment: Manual. Vienna: Schuhfried.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2010b). Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought & knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hamm, R. M. (1988). Clinical intuition and clinical analysis: expertise and the cognitive continuum. In Dowie, J. & Elstein, A. (Eds.), Professional judgment: A reader in clinical decision making, 78–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hammond, K. R. (1981). Principles of organization in intuitive and analytical cognition. Report No. 231, Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar

Hammond, K. R. (1996). Upon reflection. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 2–3, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, K. R. (2000). The cognitive continuum theory of judgment. In Hammond, K. R. (Ed.), Judgments under stress, 83–110. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, R., Ivtzan, I., & Hart, D. (2013). Mind the gap in mindfulness research: A comparative account of the leading schools of thought. Review of General Psychology, 17, 4, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 2, 99–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heikkila, A. & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 1, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmstadter, G. C. (1985). Review of Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. In Mitchell, J. V. (Ed.), Ninth mental measurements yearbook, 1693–1694. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1989). Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. Unintended Thought, 3, 75–123.Google Scholar

Higher Education Quality Council. (1996). What are graduates? Clarifying the attributes of ‘graduateness’. London: HEQC.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, D. (2004). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in critical thinking. Informal Logic, 24, 3, 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P., Langan‐Fox, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., Burke, L. A., Claxton, G., & Sparrow, P. R. (2009). Intuition in organizations: implications for strategic management. Long Range Planning, 42, 3, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 1, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 3, 174–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hogan, M. J. (2006). Against didacticism: A psychologist’s view. Educational Research and Reviews, 1, 7, 206–212.Google Scholar

Hogan, M. J., Dwyer, C. P., Noone, C., Harney, O., & Conway, R. (2014). Metacognitive skill development and applied systems science: A framework of metacognitive skills, self-regulatory functions and real-world applications. In Peña-Ayala, A. (Ed.), Metacognition: fundaments, applications, and trends, 75–106. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Holas, P. & Jankowski, T. A. (2012). Cognitive perspective on mindfulness. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 48, 3, 232–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. & Clizbe, E. (1997). Facing the 21st century. Business Education Forum, 52, 1, 33–35.Google Scholar

Hopwood, A. (1974). Accounting and human behaviour. London: Accountancy Age Books.Google Scholar

Horn, R. E. (1999). Can computers think? Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU, Inc.Google Scholar

Horn, R. E. (2003). Infrastructure for navigating interdisciplinary debates: Critical decisions for representing argumentation. In Kirschner, P., Buckingham- Shum, S., & Carr, C. (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making, 165–184. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, R. E. & Weber, R. P. (2007). New tools for resolving wicked problems: Mess mapping and resolution mapping processes. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU, Inc. and Strategy Kinetics, LLC.Google Scholar

Huffaker, D. A. & Calvert, S. L. (2003). The new science of learning: Active learning, metacognition and transfer of knowledge in e-learning applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 3, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huffman, K., Vernoy, M., Williams, B., & Vernoy, J. (1991). Psychology in action. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, N. I. R., de Croon, E. M., Smits, P. B., van Dijk, F. J. H., & Nieuwenhuijsen, K. (2008). Effectiveness of e-learning in continuing medical education for occupational physicians. Occupational Medicine, 58, 370–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hughes, J. N. (1992). Review of Cornell critical thinking tests. In Kramer, J. J. & Conoley, J. C. (Eds.), Eleventh mental measurements yearbook, 241–243. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar

Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.’s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational psychology interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved 08 August 2011, from www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/bloom.html.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. (1995). Will we be smart enough? A cognitive analysis of the coming workforce. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 5, 778–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, S. S. (1995). Technical characteristics and some correlates of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test Forms A and B. Higher Education Research, 36, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, L. L. (1998). The role of need for cognition in the development of reflective judgment. Doctoral Thesis, University of Denver, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 683–702.Google ScholarPubMed

Johnson, C. E., Hurtubise, L. C., Castrop, J., French, G., Groner, J., Ladinsky, M., McLaughlin, D., Plachta, L., & Mahan, J. D. (2004). Learning management systems: Technology to measure the medical knowledge competency of the ACGME. Medical Education, 38, 599–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. S. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved 21 June 2011, from www.cooperation.org/pages/cl-methods.html.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. H. & Blair, J. A. (1987). The current state of informal logic. Informal Logic, 9, 2–3, 147–151.Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. & Tessmer, M. (1996). An outcomes based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation and research. Training Research Journal, 2, 11–46.Google Scholar

Jukes, I. & McCain, T. (2002). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context of children’s learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kaempf, G. L., Klein, G., Thordsen, M. L., & Wolf, S. (1996). Decision making in complex naval command-and-control environments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38, 2, 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In Frangsmyr, T. (Ed.), Les prix nobel: The nobel prizes, 2002, 4, 449–489. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Penguin: Great Britain.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 49–81. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. & Ritov, I. (1994). Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 1, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., & Schkade, D. (1999). Economic preferences, or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 19, 1–3, 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (2002). The reflective judgment model: Twenty years of epistemic cognition. In Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, 37–61. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39, 1, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, P. M., Wood, P. K., & Mines, R. A. (1990). Critical thinking among college and graduate students. The Review of Higher Education, 13, 2, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitchener, K. S. & Fischer, K. W. (1990). A skill approach to the development of reflective thinking. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitchener, K. S. & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justifications and their relation to age and gender. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 2, 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, G. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. In Rouse, W. (Ed.), Advances in man-machine systems research, 5, 47–92. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 3, 456–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Rapid decision making on the fireground. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 30th Annual Meeting, 1, 576–580. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Knight, P. (2007). Grading, classifying and future learning. In Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term, 72–86. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kotovsky, H. A., Hayes, K., & Simon, J. R. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from the Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 22, 248–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 4, 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreitzer, A. E. & Madaus, G. F. (1994). Empirical investigations of the hierarchical structure of the taxonomy. In Anderson, L. W. & Sosniak, L. A. (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective, ninety-third yearbook of the national society for the study of education, 64–81. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kropp, R. P., Stoker, H. W., & Bashaw, W. L. (1966). The validation of the taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of Experimental Education, 34, 3, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ku, K. Y. L. (2009). Assessing students’ critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 1, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ku, K. Y. L. & Ho, I. T. (2010a). Dispositional factors predicting Chinese students’ critical thinking performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ku, K. Y. L. & Ho, I. T. (2010b). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition & Learning, 5, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 2, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 5, 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79, 5, 1310–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D., Katz, J. B., & Dean, D. Jr. (2004). Developing reason. Thinking & Reasoning, 10, 2, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D. & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, 121–144. Mahwah, NJ, US: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kuran, T. & Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review, 51, 4, 683–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langley, A. (1995). Between ‘paralysis by analysis’ and ‘extinction by instinct’. Sloan Management Review, 36, 63–76.Google Scholar

Laplace, P. S. (1902). A philosophical essay on probabilities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317–345.Google Scholar

Larkin, J. & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laws, P., Sokoloff, D., & Thornton, R. (1999). Promoting active learning using the results of physics education research. UniServe Science News, 13, 14–19.Google Scholar

LeBlanc, J. (1998). Thinking clearly: A guide to critical reasoning. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Leventhal, H. (1984). A perceptual-motor theory of emotion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 117–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, C. I. (1918). A survey of symbolic logic. London: Bloomsbury Academic, (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes, 5, 44–67.Google Scholar

Lloyd, M. & Bahr, N. (2010). Thinking critically about critical thinking in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4, 2, 1–16.Google Scholar

Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ma, A. W. W. (2009). Computer supported collaborative learning and higher order thinking skills: A case study of textile studies. The Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, 145–167.Google Scholar

Malcolm, K. K. (1992). Review of Cornell critical thinking tests. In Kramer, J. J. & Conoley, J. C. (Eds.), Eleventh mental measurements yearbook, 243–244. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar

Marin, L. M. & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 6, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved 26 October 2007, from www.mcrel.org/pdf/instruction/5982rr_instructionmeta_analysis.pdf.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Mascolo, M. F. (2008). The concept of domain in developmental analyses of hierarchical complexity. World Futures, 64, 5–7, 330–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maybery, M. T., Bain, J. D. & Halford, G. S. (1986). Information-processing demands of transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 4, 600–613.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 2, 240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 1, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 31–48. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 289–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 1, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Means, M. L. & Voss, J. E. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability and knowledge levels. Cognition & Instruction, 4, 2, 139–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meltzoff, J. (1998). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 1, 72–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 814–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Modjeski, R. B. & Michael, W. B. (1983). An evaluation by a panel of psychologists of the reliability and validity of two tests of CT. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 1187–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monk, P. (2001). Mapping the future of argument. Australian Financial Review. 16, 8–9.Google Scholar

Moore, A. & Malinowski, P. (2009). Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 1, 176–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moreno, R. & Park, B. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Historical development and relation to other theories. In Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.), Cognitive load theory, 29–47. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliot, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munch, J. M., Boller, G. W., & Swasy, J. L. (1993). The effects of argument structure and affective tagging on product attitude formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 2, 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murray, D. J. (1968). Repeated recall in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 2, 358–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, J. L. (1974). Memory for prose material. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energising and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy for the Twenty-First Century, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Newbern, D., Dansereau, D. F., Patterson, M. E., & Wallace, D. S. (1994). Toward a science of cooperation. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April.Google Scholar

Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving, 104, 9. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Cochrane, A. C., & Webb, B. R. (1996). An experiment in group learning technology: Evaluating critical thinking in face-to-face and computer-supported seminars. Interpersonal Computing & Technology, 4, 1, 57–74.Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, D. A. & Shallice, T. (2000). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In Gazzaniga, M. (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience: A reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Norris, S. P. (Ed.). (1992). The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Norris, S. P. (1994). The meaning of critical thinking test performance: The effects of abilities and dispositions on scores. In Fasko, D. (Ed.), Critical thinking: Current research, theory, and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Oliver, K. (2009). An investigation of concept mapping to improve the reading comprehension of science texts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 5, 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ong, W. J. (1958). Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Osman, M. E. & Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Metacognition research and theory: Analysis and implications for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 2, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostafin, B. D. & Kassman, K. T. (2012). Stepping out of history: Mindfulness improves insight problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 2, 1031–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pascarella, E. T. & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Paul, R. (1987). Dialogical thinking: Critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. In Baron, J. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, 127–148. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Paul, R. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2008). Critical thinking. California: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar

Paul, R., Elder, L., & Bartell, T. (1997). California teacher preparation for instruction in critical thinking: Research findings and policy recommendations. Sacramento, CA: State of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.Google Scholar

Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 1–1.Google Scholar

Perkins, D. N. & Ritchhart, R. (2004). When is good thinking? In Dai, D. Y. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development, 351–384. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perry, N. W., Huss, M. T., McAuliff, B. D., & Galas, J. M. (1996). An active-learning approach to teaching the undergraduate psychology and law course. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 2, 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phan, H. P. (2010). Critical thinking as a self-regulatory process component in teaching and learning. Psicothema, 22, 2, 284–292.Google ScholarPubMed

Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). Visualization and mathematics. In Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (Eds.), Visualization in mathematics, reading and science education, 5. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, 451–502. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbour, MI: The University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Post-secondary Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar

Pollio, H. (1984). What students think about and do in college lecture classes. Teaching Learning Issues, 53. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Learning Research Center.Google Scholar

Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning & Instruction, 12, 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1934/1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1999). All life is problem solving. UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Profeto-McGrath, J. (2003). The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43, 6, 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redish, E., Saul, J., & Steinberg, R. (1997). On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 65, 1, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, C., Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 22, 1, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, J. H. & Kromrey, J. D. (2001). Teaching critical thinking in a community college history course: Empirical evidence from infusing Paul’s model. College Student Journal, 35, 2, 201–215.Google Scholar

Reeves, M. F. (1990). An application of Bloom’s taxonomy to the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 7, 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richeson, J. A. & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 3, 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rimiene, V. (2002). Assessing and developing students’ critical thinking. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 2, 1, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, S. & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Robbins, S., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 2, 261–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Robinson, D. H. & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 3, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.). New York: John Wylie.Google Scholar

Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems. New York: Nichols.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 1, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saddler-Smith, E. & Shefy, E. (2004). The intuitive executive: Understanding and applying ‘gut-feel’ in decision making. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 76–91.Google Scholar

Sanders, J. A., Wiseman, R. L., & Gass, R. H. (1994). Does teaching argumentation facilitate critical thinking? Communication Reports, 7, 1, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management, doi: 10.1177/0149206309350084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartre, J. P. (1943). Being & Nothingness. Paris, France: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar

Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Weinberger, A., & Nieburhr, S. (2012). Scaffolding students for more elaborative and critical discussions. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Chania, Crete, June 14–18.Google Scholar

Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Ego depletion and intelligent performance: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Bless, H., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 2, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, T. (2003). Bloom’s taxonomy applied to testing in computer science classes. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 19, 1, 267–274.Google Scholar

Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. Point Reyes, CA: Edgepress.Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. L., Jazaieri, H., & Goldin, P. R. (2012). Mindfulness-based stress reduction effects on moral reasoning and decision making. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 6, 504–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shin, S.-J. (2002). The iconic logic of Peirce’s graphs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, H. (1999). What (good) are thinking dispositions? Educational Theory, 49, 2, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. The Academy of Management Executive (1987–1989), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1992). What is an ‘explanation’ of behavior? Psychological Science, 3, 3, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 4, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slovic, P. & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 6, 322–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, D. G. (1983). Instruction and outcomes in undergraduate settings. In Ellner, C. L. & Barnes, C. P. (Eds.), Studies of college teaching, 3–116. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar

Solon, T. (2007). Generic critical thinking infusion and course content learning in Introductory Psychology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34, 2, 95–109.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (2008). The psychology of rational thought: What intelligence tests miss. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 5, 645–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 4, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The development of creativity as a decision-making process. Creativity and Development, 91–138.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39, 2, 189–202.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 1, 87–98.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The dark side of creativity and how to combat it. In Cropley, D. H. et al. (Eds.), The dark side of creativity, 316–328. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. L. (1999). The concept of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stewart, T. R., Heideman, K. F., Moninger, W. R., & Reagan-Cirincione, P. (1992). Effects of improved information on the components of skill in weather forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 2, 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strack, F. & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 3, 220–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 5, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Australian Education Review No. 43. Victoria: Acer Press.Google Scholar

Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 159–167. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory, 29–47. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J. & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition & Instruction, 8, 4, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990).Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 2, 76–192.Google Scholar

Taube, K. T. (1997). Critical thinking ability and disposition as factors of performance on a written critical thinking test. Journal of General Education, 46, 129–164.Google Scholar

Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children’s comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, B. M. & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1995). Influences affecting the development of students’ critical thinking skills. Research in Higher Education, 36, 1, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teper, R. & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Meditation, mindfulness and executive control: The importance of emotional acceptance and brain-based performance monitoring. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 1, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Teper, R., Segal, Z. V., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Inside the mindful mind: How mindfulness enhances emotion regulation through improvements in executive control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 6, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 4, 257–287.Google Scholar

Toplak, M. E. & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 1, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trout, J. (2005, December 5). Differentiate or die. Forbes. Retrieved 17 December 2006, from www.forbes.com/opinions/2005/12/02/ ibm-nordstrom-cocacola-cx_jt_1205trout.html.Google Scholar

Tsui, L. (1999). Courses and instruction affecting critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40, 2, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 6, 740–763.Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (1984). Precis of elements of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 223–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tulving, E. & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 4157, 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 4, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Twardy, C. R. (2004). Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 27, 2, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

US National Research Council. (2002). Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead. Washington, DC: Board on Testing and Assessment Center for Education.Google Scholar

University of Western Australia. (2007). ACE and NSSE. Retrieved 28 August 2010, from www.catl.uwa.edu.au/CATLyst/archive/2007/1/ace_and_nsse.Google Scholar

Valenzuela, J., Nieto, A. M., & Saiz, C. (2011). Critical thinking motivational scale: A contribution to the study of relationship between critical thinking and motivation. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 2, 823–848.Google Scholar

Van Eemeren, F. H. (2009). The study of argumentation. In Lunsford, A. A., Wilson, K. H., & Eberly, R. A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of rhetorical studies, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., Planitin, C., Walton, D. N., Willard, C. A., Woods, J., & Zarefsky, D. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Van Gelder, T. J. (2000). Learning to reason: A Reason!Able approach. In Davis, C., van Gelder, T. J., & Wales, R. (Eds.), Cognitive science in Australia, 2000: Proceedings of the fifth Australasian cognitive science society conference. Adelaide: Causal.Google Scholar

Van Gelder, T. J. (2001). How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In Kennedy, G., Keppell, M., McNaught, C., & Petrovic, T. (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Australian society for computers in learning in tertiary education, 539–548. Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Van Gelder, T. J. (2002). Argument mapping with Reason!Able. APA Newsletter: Philosophy & Computers, 2, 1, 85–90.Google Scholar

Van Gelder, T. J. (2007). The rationale for Rationale^TM. Law, Probability & Risk, 6, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Gelder, T. J., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Enhancing expertise in informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning, educational technology, research and development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 3, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychology, 38, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varian, H. & Lyman, P. (2003). How much information? Berkeley, CA: School of Information Management & Systems, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar

Venn, J. (1881). Symbolic logic. London: Macmillan and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, N. J. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 4, 632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2014). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 94, 5, 883–898.Google Scholar

Vohs, K. D. & Faber, R. J. (2007). Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 4, 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vohs, K. D. & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Self-regulatory failure: A resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Walton, D. N. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wankat, P. (2002). The effective, efficient professor: Teaching, scholarship and service. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Watson, G. & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Watson, G. & Glaser, E. M. (1994). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal: Form S manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Weber, E. U. & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wegerif, R. (2002). Literature review in thinking skills, technology and learning: Report 2. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab.Google Scholar

Wegerif, R. & Dawes, L. (2004). Thinking and learning with ICT: Raising achievement in the primary classroom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Weinberger, J. & McClelland, D. C. (1991). Cognitive versus traditional motivational models: Irreconcilable or complementary? In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentino, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, 2, 562–597. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar