Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:02:01.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Applied theatre and participation in the ‘new’ South Africa: a possible politics

from PART III - POETICS AND PARTICIPATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Mark Fleishman
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Jenny Hughes
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Helen Nicholson
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Get access

Summary

In the words of political scientist, Lawrence Hamilton, the majority of South Africans post-apartheid continue to live in a state of what he refers to as ‘unfreedom’ – they have acquired freedom in terms of the law but do not have the power to benefit from it (2011: 355). This chapter explores the extent to which participatory performance projects, particularly among those sectors of society that remain ‘unfree’ in South Africa today (and among the youth in particular), might intervene to counter perceptions of a ‘neo-liberal squeeze on democracy’ and the weakening of active citizenship in a context in which:

The dream of a people's democracy has been shrunk from the triad of strong representative, associational and participatory democracy to a form of weak representational democracy. (Satgar 2012: n.p.)

The chapter will engage with questions that arise from participatory theatre practices that work in alliance with more established and resourced organisations, and the possible politics they might give rise to in particular with regard to the notion of authority. In order to ground these ideas, the chapter will focus on two long-term participatory performance projects with marginalised youth conducted by Magnet Theatre, a company I founded together with Jennie Reznek in 1987, with strong links to the University of Cape Town (UCT) where I have taught since 1991.

The first project, the Clanwilliam Arts Project (2001–ongoing), based in the small town of Clanwilliam 300 km north of Cape Town, is an eight-day arts residency for rural school learners free for all who wish to participate on a voluntary basis. It is based on stories from the Bleek and Lloyd Collection, the most extensive and important archive of San (particularly /Xam) culture. These stories were narrated to linguist Wilhelm Bleek and his sister-in-law, Lucy Lloyd, in the mid-nineteenth century and transcribed in more than 13,000 notebooks now housed in the UCT library. Each year the project ‘frees’ one story from the archive and reinserts it into the landscape from which it originated. The project involves 500–700 school learners from the town each year and about forty facilitators are involved from various creative disciplines: lecturers and students from the UCT Drama, Music and Fine Art departments and trainees on the Magnet Theatre Training Programme under the direction of the Magnet Theatre creative team.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, H. 1959. The Human Condition. New York: Doubleday.
Arendt, H. 1977. Between Past and Future. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Blencowe, C. 2013. ‘Biopolitical authority, objectivity and the groundwork of modern citizenship’. Journal of Political Power 6.1: 9–28.Google Scholar
Blencowe, C. 2013b. ‘Participatory knowledge matters for democracy’ in Noorani, T.Blencowe, C. and Brigstocke, J. (eds.) Problems of Participation: Reflections on Authority, Democracy and the Struggle for Common Life. Lewes: ARN Press, pp. 37–47.
Carnevale, F. and Kelsey, J. 2007. ‘Art of the possible: Fulvia Carnevale and John Kelsey in conversation with Jacques Rancière’. Artforum 45.7: 256–269.Google Scholar
De Landa, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London and New York: Continuum.
Fleishman, M. 1991. ‘Workshop Theatre in South Africa in the 1980s: A Critical Examination with Specific Reference to Power, Orality and the Carnivalesque’. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Cape Town.
Fleishman, M. 2015. ‘Lapsing into democracy: Magnet Theatre and the drama of “unspeakability” in the new South Africa’ in Luckhurst, M. and Morin, E. (eds.) Theatre and Human Rights after 1945: Things Unspeakable.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Habermas, J. 1992. ‘Citizenship and national identity: Some reflections on the future of Europe’. Praxis International 12: 1–19.Google Scholar
Hamilton, L. 2011. ‘Collective unfreedom in South Africa’. Contemporary Politics 17.4: 355–372.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. 2002. The Politics of Storytelling: Violence, Transgression and Intersubjectivity. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Kershaw, B. 1999. The Radical in Performance: Between Brecht and Baudrillard. London and New York: Routledge.
Kymlicka, W. and Norman, W. 1994. ‘Return of the citizen: A survey of recent work on citizenship theory’. Ethics, 104: 352–381.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morris, G. 2010. ‘Own-made in the (post-) new South Africa: a study of theatre originating from selected townships in the vicinity of Cape Town’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.
Mouffe, C. 1992. ‘Democratic citizenship and the political community’ in Mouffe, C. (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso, pp. 225–239.
Oakeshott, M. 1975. On Human Conduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Passerin d'Entrèves, M. 1992. ‘Hannah Arendt and the idea of citizenship’ in Mouffe, C. (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso, pp. 145–168.
Rancière, J. 2000. (trans. Rockhill, G. 2004). The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Continuum.
Rancière, J. 2008. (trans. Rockhill, G. 2011). The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.
Read, A. 2008. Theatre, Intimacy & Engagement: The Last Human Venue. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Retort. 2004. ‘Afflicted powers: The state, the spectacle and September 11’. New Left Review May/June(27): 5–21.
Rockhill, G. 2004. ‘Translator's introduction: Jacques Rancière's politics of perception’ in Rancière, J.The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Continuum, pp. 1–6.
Rogoff, I. 2005. ‘Looking away: Participations in visual culture’ in Butt, G. (ed.) After Criticism: New Responses to Art and Performance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 117–134.
Satgar, V. 2012. ‘The neoliberal squeeze on post-apartheid democracy: Reclaiming the “South African dream”’. Global Research, January 2, n.p. Available: www.globalresearch.ca/the-neoliberal-squeeze-on-post-apartheid-democracy-recliaming-the-south-african-dream/28453. Last accessed 6 October 2014.
Schechner, R. 1993. The Future of Ritual: Writings on Culture and Performance. London and New York: Routledge.
Simmel, G. 1997. (ed. by Frisby, D. and Featherstone, M.) Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. London: Sage.
Thrift, N. 2008. Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London and New York: Routledge.
Turner, V. 1983. ‘Body, brain and culture’. Zygon 18.3: 221–245.Google Scholar
Wakeford, T. and Pimbert, M. 2013. ‘Opening participatory democracy's black box: Facilitation as creative bricolage’ in Noorani, T., Blencowe, C. and Brigstocke, J. (eds.) Problems of Participation: Reflections on Authority, Democracy and the Struggle for Common Life. Lewes: ARN Press, pp. 69–82.
Walzer, M. 1992. ‘The civil society argument’ in Mouffe, C. (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso, pp. 89–107.
Žižek, S. 2004. ‘Afterword: The lesson of Rancière’ in Rancière, J.The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Continuum, pp. 69–79.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×