Bačić, F. and Pavlović, S., Komentar kaznenog zakona (Zagreb: Organizator, 2004).Google Scholar

Bačić, F. and Šeparović, Z., Krivično pravo. Posebni dio (Zagreb: Narodne novine, 1989).Google Scholar

Degan, V-Đ. and Pavišić, B., Međunarodno kazneno pravo (Rijeka: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 2005).Google Scholar

Horvatić, Ž., Novo hrvatsko kazneno pravo (Zagreb: Organizator, 1997).Google Scholar

Munivrana Vajda, M., Univerzalno načelo kao kriterij prostornog važenja kaznenog zakona (Zagreb: Hrvatsko udruženje za kaznene znanosti i praksu, MUP RH, Policijska akademija, 2007).Google Scholar

Novoselec, P., Opći dio kaznenog prava (Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 2009).Google Scholar

Pavišić, B. et al., Komentar kaznenog zakona (Zagreb: Narodne novine, 2007).Google Scholar

Srzentić, N. (ed.), Komentar Krivičnog zakona SFRJ (Beograd: Suvremena Administracija, 1982).Google Scholar

Werle, G., Principles of International Criminal Law (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression for the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Stahn, C. and van den Herik, L. (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2010), 425–49.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Evaluating Domestic Legislation on the Customary Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’s Complementarity Regime’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 725–54.Google Scholar

Turković, K., ‘Kaznena djela protiv međunarodnog prava’, in Horvatić, Z. et al. (eds.), Kazneno pravo, Posebni dio (Zagreb: Masmedia, 1999), 150–86.Google Scholar

Ambos, K., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 463–509.Google Scholar

Degan, V-Đ., ‘Odgovornost za zločin agresije u svim njezinim vidovima’, Rad HAZU, 48 (2011), 233–89.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 18 (2007), 477–521.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Munivrana Vajda, M., ‘Types of Culpability and the Permanent International Criminal Court’ (in Croatian), Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 18 (2011), 3–29.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B., ‘Par in Parem Imperium Non Habet. Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 133–64.Google Scholar

Criminal Code of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Official Gazette SFRJ, Nos. 4/77, 13/85, 36/77, 26/86, 74/87, 57/89 i 3/90.Google Scholar

Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia (Narodne novine), Nos. 31/93, 110/97, 27/98, 50/00, 129/00, 51/01, 111/03, 190/03, 105/04, 84/05, 71/06, 110/07, 152/08, 57/11, 125/11, 56/90, 135/97, 113/00, 28/01, 76/10, 175/03, 29/04-corr., 55/11, 102/2000 and 80/96.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1996, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, 171.Google Scholar