Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Creole Debate , pp. 150 - 164Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Aboh, Enoch O. 2009. Competition and selection: that’s all! In Aboh, & Smith, (2009b), 317–344.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. 2011. Creoles are not distinct languages! Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, Accra, Ghana, August, 2-6, 2011.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. 2016. Creole distinctiveness: a dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31: 400–418.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. 2017a. Linguistic complexity: interfaces and processing. Language Sciences: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. 2017b. The emergence of hybrid grammars: a rejoinder to Peter Bakker. Word 63: 207-222.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., and Ansaldo, Umberto. 2007. The role of typology in language creation. In Ansaldo, Matthews & Lim (2007), 39–66.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., and DeGraff, Michel. 2017. A null theory of creole formation based on Universal Grammar. In The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar, ed. Roberts, Ian, 401–458. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., and Smith, Norval. 2009a. Simplicity, simplification, complexity and complexification. In Aboh & Smith (2009b), 1–25.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., and Smith, Norval (eds.) 2009b. Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2007. Review of John McWhorter 2005 (Defining Creole). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22: 170–176.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2008. Sri Lanka Malay revisited: genesis and classification, a world of many voices: lessons from documented endangered languages, ed. Harrison, David, Rood, David and Dwyer, Arienne, 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2017. Creole complexity in sociolinguistic perspective. Language Sciences 60: 26–35.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto, and Matthews, Stephen J.. 2001. Typical creoles and simple languages: the case of Sinitic. Linguistic Typology 5.3/4: 311–325.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto, Matthews, Stephen and Lim, Lisa (eds.) 2007. Deconstructing creole. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto, and Nordhoff, Sebastian. 2009. Complexity and the age of languages. In Aboh & Smith (2009b), 345–363.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip. 1993. Australian influence on Melanesian Pidgin English. Te Reo 36: 3–67.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip, and Syea, Anand. 1991. On the copula in Mauritian Creole, past and present. In Development and Structure of Creole Languages, ed. Byrne, Francis and Huebner, Thom, 159–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 1994. Is John Long’s Chippeway (1791) an Ojibwe pidgin? In Papers of the 25th Algonquian Conference, ed. Cowan, William, 13–31. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 1996. Hudson Bay traders’ Cree: a Cree pidgin? In Nikotwâsik iskwâhtêm, pâskihtêpahih! Studies in Honour of H. C. Wolfart, ed. Nichols, John D. and Ogg, Arden C., 1–34. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics Memoir 13.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 1997. A language of our own: the genesis of Michif, the Mixed Cree–French language of the Canadian Metis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2008. Pidgins versus creoles and pidgincreoles. In Kouwenberg & Singler (2008), 130–157.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2014. Creolistics: back to square one? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29: 177–194.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2016b. You got Gungbe but we got the numbers. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31: 419–435.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Borchsenius, Finn, Levisen, Carsten and Sippola, Eeva (eds.) 2017. Creole studies – phylogenetic approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Daval-Markussen, Aymeric, Parkvall, Mikael and Plag, Ingo. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26: 5–42.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, and Mous, Maarten (eds.) 1994. Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, and Muysken, Pieter. 1995. Mixed languages and language intertwining. In Pidgins and creoles: an introduction, ed. Arends, Jacques, Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval, 41–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baptista, Marlyse. 2003. Reduplication in Cape Verdean creole. In Twice as meaningful: reduplication in pidgins, creoles and other contact varieties, ed. Kouwenberg, Silvia, 177–184. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Bentley, W. Holman. 1887. Dictionary and grammar of the Kikongo language. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Bentz, Christian, and Winter, Bodo. 2013. Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 3: 1–27.Google Scholar
Bentz, Christian, and Berdicevskis, Aleksandrs. 2016. Learning pressures reduce morphological complexity: linking corpus, computational and experimental evidence. Online Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity at the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
Berry, Keith, and Berry, Christine. 1999. A Description of Abun. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Teresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian and Sheehan, Michelle. 2014. Complexity in comparative syntax: the view from modern parametric theory. In Newmeyer, & Preston, (2014), 103–127.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The Language Bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–188.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1995. Language and human behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Alfred H. 1981. The linguistic shaping of thought: a study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2000. Language and hybridization: pidgin tales from the China coast. Interventions 2: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, and Henri, Fabiola. 2010. Workshop on formal aspects of creole studies, Berlin, November 9.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1993. Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, ed. Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap, 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera, Schmidt, Lauren and Phillips, Webb. 2003. Sex, syntax and semantics. In Language in mind: advances in the study of language and cognition, ed. Gentner, Deirdre and Goldin-Meadow, Susan, 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Hazel. 1987. Suprasegmentals in Guyanese: some African comparisons. In Pidgin and creole languages, ed. Gilbert, Glenn G., 213–263. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy. 1991. The Indo-Portuguese creoles: languages in transition. Hispania 74: 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy. 1992. Elements of resistance in contact-induced language change. In Explanation in historical linguistics, ed. Davis, Garry W. and Iverson, Gregory K., 41–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colarusso, John. 1992. A grammar of the Kabardian language. University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1990. From Beach-la-Mar to Bislama: the emergence of a national language in Vanuatu. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter, and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric. 2013. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45: 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric , Bøegh, Kristoffer Friis & Bakker, Peter. 2017. West African languages and creoles worldwide. In Bakker, Borchsenius, Levisen & Sippola (2017), 141–174.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1994. To move or not to move? Placement of verbs and object pronouns in Haitian Creole and in French. In Papers from the 30th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Beals, Katherine, Denton, Jeanette, Knippen, Robert, Melnar, Lynette, Suzuki, Hisami and Zeinfeld, Erica, 141–155. University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1997. Verb syntax in, and beyond, creolization. In The new comparative syntax, ed. Haegeman, Liliane, 64–94. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1999a. Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: an epilogue. In DeGraff, (1999b), 473–543.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel (ed.) 1999b. Language creation and language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 1999c. Morphology in creole genesis: a 20-minute (?*!∆%$¡?‡!?) prolegomenon. Paper presented at the Neuvième Colloque International des Études Créoles, Aix-en-Provence, June 24-29.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2000. Creole speakers as a biologically definable class? Morphology in language creation. Paper presented to the Language in Society Workshop, University of Chicago, January 10, 2000.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2001a. On the origin of creoles: a Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology 5.2/3: 213–310.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2001b. Morphology in creole genesis: linguistics and ideology. In Ken Hale, a life in language, ed. Kenstowicz, Michael, 53–121. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2002. Relexification: a re-evaluation. Anthropological Linguistics 44: 321–414.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2005. Morphology and word order in “creolization” and beyond. In Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard S., 293–372. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel 2009. Language change in creolization, and, thus, language change: some Cartesian–Uniformitarian boundary conditions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3/4: 888–971.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel, Berwick, Robert and Bass, Trevor. 2013. Modern phylogenetics and creole evolution: creole family values. http://alpha-leonis.lids.mit.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/intlcongress-creoles-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 1992. Is Haitian Creole really a pro-drop language? Travaux de recherche sur le Créole Haïtien 11: 23–40.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond. 1985. Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Arlington, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2006. Flores languages. In Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world, ed. Browne, Keith and Ogilvie, Sarah, 420-421. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark, and Denham, Tim. Forthcoming. Becoming Austronesian: mechanisms of language dispersal across southern Island Southeast Asia. In Austronesian undressed, ed. by Schapper, Antoinette.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The language myth: why language is not an instinct. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas. 2003. The -pela suffix in Tok Pisin and the notion of “simplicity” in pidgin and creole languages: what happens to morphology under contact? In Plag (2003), 269–290.Google Scholar
Fayer, Joan M. 2003. African interpreters in the Atlantic slave trade. Anthropological Linguistics 45: 281–295.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity. In Pidginization and creolization of languages, ed. Hymes, Dell, 141–150. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fon Sing, Guillaume. 2017. Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Language Ecology 1: 44-74.Google Scholar
Forshaw, William. 2016. Little kids, big verbs: the acquisition of Murrinhpatha bipartite stem verbs. University of Melbourne Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Gao, Yongming. 1998. Mental representations of Chinese numeral classifiers. Lehigh University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2001. Creoles, complexity, and Riau Indonesian. Linguistic Typology 2/3: 325–371.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2007. Creoles, complexity and associational semantics. In Ansaldo, Matthews & Lim (2007), 67–108.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2014. Sign languages, creoles, and the development of predication. In Newmeyer & Preston (2014), 37–64.Google Scholar
Goldshtein, Yonatan. 2017. The simple emerging from the complex: nominal number in Juba Arabic creole. In Bakker, Borchsenius, Levisen & Sippola (2017), 193–217.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff C. 2012. Typologizing grammatical complexities or why creoles may be paradigmatically simple but syntagmatically average. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27: 1–47.Google Scholar
Goulden, Richard J. 1990. The Melanesian content in Tok Pisin. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Grant, Anthony. 1996. The evolution of functional categories in Grande Ronde Chinook Jargon: ethnolinguistic and grammatical considerations. In Changing meanings, changing functions: papers relating to grammaticalization in creole languages, ed. Baker, Philip and Syea, Anand, 225–242. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Collette, and Seifart, Frank. 2004. Noun classes in African and Amazonian languages: towards a comparison. Linguistic Typology 8: 243–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut. 1994. Danish. In The Germanic languages, ed. König, Ekkehard and van der Auwera, Johan, 313–348. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hagfors, Karl Johan. 1891. Gamlakarlebymålet: ljud- ock formlära samt språkprov. Svenska landsmål och svenskt folkliv 12: 1–124.Google Scholar
Hansson, Inga-Lill. 2003. Akha. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, ed. Thurgood, Graham and LaPolla, Randy J., 236–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds.) 2005. World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Nurse, Derek. 2000. African languages: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison, and Tangney, Denise. 1999. Functional categories and parameter setting in the second-language acquisition of Irish in early childhood. In DeGraff (1999b), 239–253.Google Scholar
Holm, John, and Patrick, Peter. 2007. Comparative creole syntax: parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Traugott, Elizabeth. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Geoffrey. 1998. The basic lexical affinities of Timor’s Austronesian languages: a preliminary investigation. Studies in the languages and cultures of East Timor 1: 97–174.Google Scholar
Hull, Geoffrey. 2001. A morphological overview of the Timoric Sprachbund. Studies in languages and cultures of East Timor 4: 98–205.Google Scholar
Ibbotson, Paul, and Tomasello, Michael. 2016. Language in a new key. Scientific American 315: 70–75.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, Winthrop. 2003. The role of tone and rhyme structure in the organisation of grammatical morphemes in Tobagonian. In Plag (2003), 165–190.Google Scholar
Jansson, Fredrik, Parkvall, Mikael and Strimling, Pontus. 2015. Modeling the evolution of creoles. Language Dynamics and Change 5: 1–51.Google Scholar
Jourdan, Christine, and Keesing, Roger. 1997. From Fisin to Pijin: creolization in process in the Solomon Islands. Language in Society 26: 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, Roger M. 1988. Melanesian Pidgin and the Oceanic substrate. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihm, Alain. 2003. Inflectional categories in creole languages. In Plag (2003), 333–363.Google Scholar
Kihm, Alain. 2008. Creoles, markedness and default settings: an appraisal. In Kouwenberg & Singler (2008), 411–439.Google Scholar
Koefoed, Geert, and Tarenskeen, Jacqueline. 1996. The making of a language from a lexical point of view. In Creole languages and language acquisition, ed. Wekker, Herman, 119–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2010. Creole studies and linguistic typology, Part 1. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25: 173–186.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia, and Singler, John Victor (eds.) 2008. The handbook of pidgin and creole studies. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Taylor, Ann and Ringe, Donald. 2000. The Middle English verb-second constraint: a case study in language contact and language change. In Textual parameters in older languages, ed. Herring, Susan C., Van Reenen, Pieter and Schøsler, Lene, 353-391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kusters, Wouter. 2003. Linguistic complexity: the influence of social change on verbal inflection. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert, Remijsen, Bert and Manyang, Caguor Adong. 2009. On the distinction between regular and irregular inflectional morphology: evidence from Dinka. Language 85: 659–670.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 2001. What you see is not always what you get: apparent simplicity and hidden complexity in creole languages. Linguistic Typology 5: 186–213.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. (ed.) 2011. Creoles, their substrates, and language typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire, and Brousseau, Anne-Marie. 2001. A grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzino, Gerardo, Alvarez, Alexandra, Obediente, Enrique and de Granda, Germán. 1998. El español caribeño: antecedentes sociohistóricos y lingüísticos. In Perl, & Schwegler, (1998), 25–69.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Ralph, Telchid, Sylviane and Bruneau-Ludwig, Florence (eds.) 2001. Corpus créole. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Luís, Ana R. 2009. The loss and survival of inflectional morphology: contextual vs. inherent inflection in creoles. In Romance Linguistics 2009, ed. Colina, Sonia, Olarrea, Antxon and Carvalho, Ana, 323–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lumsden, John S. 1999. Language acquisition and creolization. In DeGraff (1999b), 129–157.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary, and Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PloS One 5: 1.Google Scholar
Magner, Thomas. 1966. A Zagreb Kajkavian Dialect. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Manessy, Gabriel. 1994. Le français en Afrique noire. Paris and Saint-Denis: L’Harmattan / Université de la Réunion.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973. The grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Publications.Google Scholar
Matthews, William K. 1956. The Livonian element in modern Latvian. In Festschrift für Max Vasmer zur 70. Geburtstag, ed. Woltner, Margarete and Bräuer, Herbert, 307–318. Berlin: Veröffentlichungen der Abteilung für slawische Sprachen und Literaturen des Osteuropa-Instituts an der Freien Universitäts Berlin.Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin. 2014. “I don’t care one cent what [ ] goying on in Great Britten”: be- deletion in Irish English. American Speech 89: 441–469.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 1996. The diachrony of predicate negation in Saramaccan creole: synchronic and typological implications. Studies in Language 20: 285–311.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 1997. Lost in transmission: a case for the independent emergence of the Atlantic creole copula. In Spears & Winford (1997), 241–261.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2000. The Missing Spanish creoles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2001a. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5.3/4: 125–156.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2001b. Defining creole as a synchronic term. In Degrees of restructuring in creole languages, ed. Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid and Schneider, Edgar, 85–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2007. Language interrupted: signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2008. Inflectional morphology and universal grammar: post hoc versus propter hoc. In Variation, selection, development: probing the evolutionary model of language change, ed. Eckardt, Regine, Jäger, Gerhard and Veenstra, Tonjes, 337–373. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2011. Tying up loose ends: the creole prototype after all. Diachronica 28: 82–117.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2012a. Complexity Hotspot: The copula in Saramaccan and its implications. In Linguistic complexity: second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, ed. Kortmann, Bernd and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, 243–264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2012b. Case closed? Testing the Feature Pool hypothesis. (Guest Column No. 1) Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27: 171–182.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2014a. Mesolects as the norm: semi-creoles revisited. Papia 24: 81–100.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2016. Is analyticity normal? Implications of Niger-Congo and Sino-Tibetan for typology and diachronic theory. In Cyclical change continued, ed. Van Gelderen, Elly, 49–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2018. Paper presented at Tokyo grammaticalization conference, 2015.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H. Forthcoming. The radically isolating languages of Flores: a challenge to diachronic theory. Journal of Historical Linguistics.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H., and Good, Jeff C.. 2012. A grammar of Saramaccan creole. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H., and Parkvall, Mikael. 2002. Pas tout à fait du français: une étude créole. Études Créoles 25: 179–231.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius and Karlsson, Fred (eds.) 2008. Language complexity: typology, contact, change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary. 2012. External influences on English. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Monachesi, Paola. 2006. Clitics, pronouns, noun phrases and the Head–Complement parameter. In Annali dell’ Università di Ferrara, ed. Galli, M., 15–30. University of Ferrara.Google Scholar
Mous, Maarten. 2003. The making of a mixed language: the case of Ma’a/Mbugu. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1986a. Restrictive relativization in Gullah. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 1: 1–31.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1986b. The universalist and substrate hypotheses complement each other. In Substrata versus universals in creole genesis, ed. Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval, 129–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1989. Colonial, hypermetropic and wishful linguistics. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 4: 241–254.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1994. Misinterpreting linguistic continuity charitably. In The crucible of Carolina, ed. Montgomery, Michael, 38–59. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1997a. Jargons, pidgins, creoles and koines: what are they? In The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, ed. Spears, Arthur and Winford, Donald, 35–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2003. Genetic linguistics and genetic creolistics: a response to Sarah G. Thomason’s “creoles and genetic relationships.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 18: 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2008. Language evolution: contact, competition and change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2009. Restructuring, hybridization, and complexity in language evolution. In Aboh & Smith (2009), 367–400.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2014. The case was never closed. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29: 157–171.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2015. Pidgin and creole languages. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, Vol. XVIII, ed. Wright, James D., 133–145. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1997. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics (expanded and revised edn.). London: University of Westminster.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2005. Possible and Probable Languages: a generative perspective on linguistic typology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J., and Preston, Laurel B. (eds.) 2014. Measuring grammatical complexity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurse, Derek. 2007. Did the proto-Bantu verb have a synthetic or an analytic structure? SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 239–256.Google Scholar
Ogie, Ota. 2003. About multi-verb constructions in Edo. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Multi-Verb Constructions, Trondheim Summer School 2003, ed. Beermann, Dorothee and Hellan, Lars. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Packard, Jerome L. 2000. The morphology of Chinese: a linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2000. Out of Africa: African influences in Atlantic creoles. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2002. Cutting off the branch. In Pidgin and creole linguistics in the 21st century, ed. Gilbert, Glenn G., 355–367. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki & Karlsson (2008), 265–285.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael, Bakker, Peter and McWhorter, John. 2017. Creoles and sociolinguistic complexity: a response to Ansaldo. Language Sciences.Google Scholar
Perl, Matthias, and Schwegler, Armin. 1998. El palenquero. América negra: panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades criollas y afrohispanas. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Phillips, Judith Wingerd. 1982. A partial grammar of the Haitian Creole verb system. SUNY Buffalo Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo (ed.) 2003. Phonology and morphology of creole languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo 2008a. Creoles as interlanguages: inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23: 114–135.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo 2008b. Creoles as interlanguages: syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23: 307–328Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo 2011. Creolization and admixture: typology, feature pools, and second language acquisition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1987. The Scandinavian languages and the null-subject parameter. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5: 377–401.Google Scholar
Quint, Nicolas. 2000. Le cap verdien: origines et devenir d’une langue métisse. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1986. Social contact and linguistic diffusion: Hiberno-English and New World Black English. Language 62: 245–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddle, Elizabeth M. 2008. Complexity in isolating languages: elaboration versus grammatical economy. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki & Karlsson (2008), 133–151.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sarah J. 1998. The genesis of Hawaiian Creole and diffusion. Language 74: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sarah J. 2000. Nativization and the genesis of Hawaiian Creole. In Language change and language contact in pidgins and creoles, ed. McWhorter, John H., 257–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sarah J., and Bresnan, Joan. 2008. Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: a typological study. Linguistic Typology 12: 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarin, William. 1997. The creolization of pidgin morphophonology. In Spears & Winford (1997), 175–216.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2006. Does simple imply creole? In A man of measure: festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday (special supplement to SKY Journal of Linguistics 19), 362–374. Turku: The Linguistic Association of Finland.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David and Trudgill, Peter (eds.) 2009. Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian (ed.) 1980. The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Brown, Penelope. 1980. On the origins of syntax in discourse. In Sankoff (1980), 211–255.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian and Laberge, Suzanne. 1980. On the acquisition of native speakers by a language. In Sankoff (1980), 195–209.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1990. Tagalog. In The world’s major languages, ed. Comrie, Bernard, 936–958. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1888. Kreolische Studien. VIII. Über das Annamito-französische. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien 116: 227–234.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Armin. 1996. “Chi ma nkongo”: lengua y rito ancestrales en El Palenque de San Basilio (Colombia). Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Armin, and Green, Kate. 2007. Palenquero (Creole Spanish). In Holm and Patrick (2007), 273–306.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel. 1976. An areal-typological study of American Indian languages north of Mexico. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Shosted, Ryan. 2006. Correlating complexity: a typological approach. Journal of Linguistic Typology 10: 1–40.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of pidgin and creole languages. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spears, Arthur, and Winford, Donald (eds.) 1997. The structure and status of pidgins and creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1995. Clitic constructions. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, ed. Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Steffanson, Vilhjalmur. 1909. The Eskimo trade jargon of Herschel Island. American Anthropologist 2: 217–232.Google Scholar
Syea, Anand. 1997. Copula, wh-trace, and the ECP in Mauritian Creole. Linguistics 35: 25–56.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, and Kortmann, Bernd. 2009. The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: a quantitative perspective. Lingua 119: 1643–63.Google Scholar
Tchekhoff, Claude. 1979. From ergative to accusative in Tongan: an example of synchronic dynamics. In Ergativity: towards a theory of grammatical relations, ed. Plank, Frans, 407–418. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 1980. On interpreting “The Indian Interpreter.” Language in Society 9: 167–193.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 1982. Chinook Jargon in areal and historical context. Language 59: 820–870.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 1997. Contact languages: a wider perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2003. A response to Mufwene’s response. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 18: 289–298.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2008. Pidgins/creoles and historical linguistics. In Kouwenberg & Singler (2008), 242–262.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., and Kaufman, Terence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, William R. 1987. Processes of change in the languages of northwestern New Britain. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Tinits, Peeter. 2013. Language stability and morphological complexity in situations of language contact: an experimental paradigm. Online Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Linguistics, July 20-27.Google Scholar
Tinits, Peeter, Nölle, Jonas and Hartmann, Stefan. 2017. Usage context influences the evolution of overspecification in iterated learning. Journal of Language Evolution 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1989. Contact and evolution in linguistic change. In Language change: contributions to the study of its causes, ed. Brevik, Leiv Egil and Jahr, Ernst Håkon, 227–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1996. Dialect typology: isolation, social network and phonological structure. In Towards a social science of language, Vol. I: Variation and change in language and society, ed. Guy, Gregory, Feagin, Crawford, Schiffrin, Deborah and Baugh, John, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tryon, Darrell T., and Charpentier, Jean-Michel (eds.) 2004. Pacific pidgins and creoles: origin, growth and development. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdman, Albert. 2015. Haitian Creole: structure, variation, status, origin. Bristol, CT: Equinox.Google Scholar
Veenstra, Tonjes. 1996. Serial verbs in Saramaccan. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Veenstra, Tonjes. 2003. What verbal morphology can tell us about creole genesis: the case of French-related creoles. In Plag (2003), 293–313.Google Scholar
Verhaar, John W. M. 1995. Towards a reference grammar of Tok Pisin: an experiment in corpus linguistics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Vogt, Carlos, and Fry, Peter. 2005. As formas de expressão na língua africana do Cafundó. Ciência e Cultura 57: 39–42.Google Scholar
Volker, Craig A. 1998. The Nalik language of New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Watters, John Robert. 1979. Focus in Aghem. In Aghem Grammatical Structure, ed. Hyman, Larry, 137–197. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1998. On the origins of African American Vernacular English – a creolist perspective (Part II: The linguistic features). Diachronica 15: 99–154.Google Scholar
Wittmann, Henri. 1998. Les créolismes syntaxiques du français magoua parlé aux Trois-Rivières. In Français d’amérique: variation, créolisation, normalisation, ed. Brasseur, Patrice, 219–248. Université d’Avignon, Centre d’études canadiennes.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, Elmer 1975. A description of Hiligaynon syntax. Norman, OK: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Woll, Bencie, Sutton-Spence, Rachel and Elton, Frances. 2001. Multilingualism: the global approach to sign languages. In The sociolinguistics of sign language, ed. Lucas, Ceil, 8–32. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison, and Grace, George W.. 2007. The consequences of talking to strangers: evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistics form. Lingua 117: 543–578.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Kasumi. 2005. The acquisition of numeral classifiers: the case of Japanese children. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Young, Robert, and Morgan, William. 1987. The Navajo language: a grammar and colloquial dictionary. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Zenk, Henry Benjamin. 1984. Chinook Jargon and native cultural persistence in the Grande Ronde Indian community, 1856–1907: a special case of creolization. University of Oregon Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar