Abbott, Frederick M.: Second Report (Final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the Subject of the Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Parallel Importation, FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 2000 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1921856).Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick M.: Parallel Importation: Economic and Social Welfare Dimensions, 2007 (www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/parallel_importation.pdf).Google Scholar

Abelson, Sarah: An Emerging Secondary Market for Digital Music – The Legality of ReDigi and the Extent of the First Sale Doctrine, Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, Winter 2012: pp. 8–11.Google Scholar

Akkermans, Bram, and Ramaekers, Eveline: Article 345 TFEU (ex. 295 EC), Its Meanings and Interpretations, European Law Journal, Vol. 3/2010, pp. 292–314.Google Scholar

Alderman, Elliott C.: Resale Royalties in the United States for Fine Visual Artists: An Alien Concept, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 40/1983, pp. 265–283.Google Scholar

Aldridge, Lindsay R.: Costco v. Omega and the First Sale Doctrine, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 12/2011, pp. 325–344.Google Scholar

Allfeld, Philipp: Das Urheberrecht an Werken der Literatur und der Tonkunst, Zweite, vielfach veränderte Auflage, Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 1928.Google Scholar

Alter, Alexandra: Amazon Unveils E-Book Subscription Service, With Some Notable Absenses, The New York Times, July 18, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/07/19/business/media/amazon-introduces-kindle-subscription-service.html).Google Scholar

Alvarado, Daniela: Seamaster-ing the First Sale Doctrine: A Tripartite Framework for Navigating the Applicability of Section 109(a) to Gray Market Goods, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2012: pp. 885–925.Google Scholar

Amundsen, Kaitlyn E.: From Your Land to Mine: The Benefits of Applying the First Sale Doctrine to Goods Manufactured Abroad, George Mason Journal of International Commercial Law, Spring 2012, pp. 339–364.Google Scholar

Aplin, Tanya: The ECJ Elucidates the Database Right, Intellectual Property Quarterly, Issue 2/2005, pp. 204–221.Google Scholar

Appl, Clemens, and Schmidt, Marlene: Zweitverwertung gebrauchter Digitalgüter – Die Folgen des UsedSoft-Urteils für Schöpfungen anderer Werkarten, Medien und Recht, Issue 4/2014, pp. 189–200.Google Scholar

Arnerstål, Stojan: Licensing Digital Content in a Sale of Goods Context, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 10/2015, pp. 750–758.Google Scholar

Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI): Report and Opinion on the Making Available and Communication to the Public in the Internet Environment – Focus on Linking Techniques on the Internet, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 149–154.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Benedict, and Fitzgerald, Brian: A Short History of Copyright – The Genie Information, Springer, Cham, 2014.Google Scholar

Axberg, Robyn: File-Sharing Tools and Copyright Law: A Study of In Re Aimster Copyright Litigation and MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Loyola University Chicago Law Review, Fall 2003, pp. 389–456.Google Scholar

Bacon, Thomas J.: Caveat Bibliotheca: The First Sale Doctrine and the Future of Libraries after Omega v. Costco, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 11/2011: pp. 414–438.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, David: Software Copyright Law, 4th ed. Butterworths, London, 1999.Google Scholar

Barbour, Adrienne Clare: Used iTunes: The Legality of ReDigi's Model for a Second-Hand Digital Music Store, Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Fall 2012, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar

Barfield, Claude E., and Groombridge, Mark A.: The Economic Case for Copyright Owner Control over Parallel Imports, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Issue 6/1998, pp. 904–939.Google Scholar

Barker, Emily: The California Resale Royalty Act: Droit De [Not So] Suite, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Issue 2/2011, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar

Batchelor, Bill, and Montani, Luca: Exhaustion, Essential Subject Matter and Other CJEU Judicial Tools to Update Copyright for an Online Economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 8/2015, pp. 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Christian: Urheberrechtliche Erschöpfungslehre und digitale Informationstechnologie, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 3/2002, pp. 198–203.Google Scholar

Berger, Christian: Verkehrsfähigkeit “Digitaler Güter”: Zur Dogmatik der Verkehrsfähigkeit von Rechten, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 170–194.Google Scholar

Bice, Scott H.: The Limited Grant of Certiorari and the Justification of Judicial Review, Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 1975/1975: pp. 343–413.Google Scholar

Bjelke, Harald: The Development of Nordic Copyright in the Light of Court Usage, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 1/1991, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar

Blomqvist, Jørgen: Primer on International Copyright and Related Rights, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014.Google Scholar

Bodewig, Theo: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Takenaka, Toshiko (Ed.): Intellectual Property in Civil Law and Common Law, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013: pp. 401–415.Google Scholar

Bodewits, Joke: The Reselling of Second Hand E-Books Allowed in the Netherlands, E-Commerce Law Reports, Issue 4/2014, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

Bonadio, Enrico: Parallel Imports in a Global Market: Should a Generalised International Exhaustion be the Next Step?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/2011, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar

Borghi, Naurizio, Maggiolino, Mariateresa, Montagnani, Maria Lillá, and Nuccio, Massimiliano: Determinants in the Online Distribution of Digital Content: An Exploratory Analysis, European Journal for Law and Technology, Issue 2/2012, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Bracha, Oren: United States Copyright, 1672–1909. In: Alexander, Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 335–371.Google Scholar

Braun, Thorsten: Schutz geistigen Eigentums contra Berufsausübungsfreiheit am Beispiel der Tonträgervermietung, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 8–9/1998, pp. 627–630.Google Scholar

Bräutigam, Peter: Second-Hand Software in Europe – Thoughts on the Three Questions of the German Federal Court of Justice Referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union, Computer Law Review International, Issue 1/2012, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breagelmann, Tom: Copyright Law in and under the Constitution: The Constitutional Scope and Limits to Copyright Law in the United States in Comparison with the Scope and Limits Imposed by Constitutional and European Law on Copyright Law in Germany, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 27/2009: pp. 99–144.Google Scholar

Brooks, Samuel: Battling Gray Markets through Copyright Law: Omega, S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 20/2010: pp. 19–33.Google Scholar

Brustein, Joshua: Spotify Hits 10 Million Paid Users. Now Can It Make Money?, Bloomberg Businessweek, May 21, 2014 (www.businessweek.com/articles/2014–05–21/why-spotify-and-the-streaming-music-industry-cant-make-money).Google Scholar

Business Insider: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, March 1, 2011 (www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankrupted-and-destroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3).Google Scholar

Bussey, Alexander: The Incompatibility of Droit de Suite with Common Law Theories of Copyright, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, Issue 3/2013, pp. 1063–1104.Google Scholar

Büscher, Mareile, and Müller, Judith: Urheberrechtliche Fragestellungen des Audio-Video-Streamings, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 6/2009, pp. 558–560.Google Scholar

Calaba, Victor F.: Quibbles ’n Bits: Making a Digital First Sale Doctrine Feasible, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 9/2002: pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene: Trademark Exhaustion in the European Union: Community-Wide or International? The Saga Continues, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 6/2002: pp. 47–86.Google Scholar

Calboli, Irene: The United States Supreme Court's Decision in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons: An “Inevitable” Step in Which Direction?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 1/2014, pp. 75–91.Google Scholar

Cameron, Alec: Copyright Exceptions for the Digital Age: New Rights of Private Copying, Parody and Quotation, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 12/2014, pp. 1002–1007.Google Scholar

Capobianco, Gregory: Rethinking ReDigi: How a Characteristics-Based Test Advances the “Digital First Sale” Doctrine Debate, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 35/2013, pp. 391–424.Google Scholar

Carrington, Victoria: .ca Domain Names are Personal Property, World Intellectual Property Review, May/June 2014, p. 81.Google Scholar

Challis, Ben: Warner Music Moves to Settle Digital Royalties Class Action, The 1709 Blog, January 9, 2014 (http://the1709blog.blogspot.hu/2014/01/warner-music-moves-to-settle-digital.html).Google Scholar

Chatterjee, I. Neel: Imperishable Intellectual Creations: The Limits of the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 5/1995: pp. 383–425.Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Vincent: The Desirability of Agreeing to Disagree: The WTO, TRIPS, International IPR Exhaustion and a Few Other Things, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 21/2000: pp. 333–392.Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Vincent: Patent Exhaustion: What's It Good For?, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 51/2011: pp. 101–161.Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Vincent: Working toward International Harmony on Intellectual Property Exhaustion (and Substantive Law). In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 125–144.Google Scholar

Chiarizio, Matthew: An American Tragedy: E-Books, Licences, and the End of Public Lending Libraries, Vanderbilt Law Review, Issue 2/2013, pp. 615–644.Google Scholar

Choderker, Ivy: The First Sale Doctrine Defense as a Limit on the Right of Publicity: Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 19/1998–1999, pp. 413–444.Google Scholar

Cistaro, Mario: The Interface between the EU Copyright Law and the Fundamental Economic Freedoms of Trade and Competition in the Digital Single Market: From the FAPL Case to the Decision, UsedSoft, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Issue 2/2016, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar

Clark, Charles R.: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corporation of America: Application of the Fair Use Doctrine under the United States Copyright Acts of 1909 and 1976, New England Law Review, Vol. 15/1979–1980: pp. 661–681.Google Scholar

Coats, William S., Rafter, Heather D., Feeman, Vickie L., and Given, John G.: Blows against the Empire: Napster, Aimster, Grokster and the War against P2P File Sharing, Practising Law Institute, Vol. 765/2003: pp. 445–488.Google Scholar

Cohen, Patricia: Lobbyists Set to Fight Royalty Bill for Artists, New York Times, March 23, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/arts/design/auction-houses-taking-no-chances-on-american-royalties-too-act.html).Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Cabletelevision, Satellites and Copyright, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 2–3/1985, pp. 188–195.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: The EC Copyright Directives, Economics and Authors’ Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 6/1994, pp. 821–839.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: European Copyright Law – Ever More Horizontal, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/2001, pp. 532–545.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Harmonising Intellectual Property Law within the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1992, pp. 622–629.Google Scholar

Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Prohibition of Parallel Imports through Intellectual Property Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1999, pp. 495–511.Google Scholar

Collins, Maureen B.: Crossing Parallel Lines: The State of the First Sale Doctrine after Costco v. Omega, Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 8/2012: pp. 26–49.Google Scholar

Congdon, Julie S.: Copyright Law – Gray Marketing – The First Sale Doctrine of Copyright Law Closes Another Avenue of Redress, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 34/1989: pp. 597–609.Google Scholar

Cook, Trevor: EU Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.Google Scholar

Corbet, Jan: The Law of the EEC and Intellectual Property, Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol. 13/1994: pp. 327–369.Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos M.: Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Oxford Commentaries on the GATT/WTO Agreements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos M., and Correa, Juan I.: Parallel Imports and the Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in Latin America. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 198–225.Google Scholar

Corsello, Kenneth R.: The Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990: Another Bend in the First Sale Doctrine, Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 41/1991: pp. 177–209.Google Scholar

Costanza, Nicholas: Digital Music Garage Sale: An Analysis of Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. and a Proposal for Legislative Reform in Copyright Enabling a Secondary Market for Digital Music, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Winter 2015, pp. 135–161.Google Scholar

Cozine, John C.: Fade to Black? The Fate of the Gray Market after L'anza Research International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 66/1998: pp. 775–800.Google Scholar

Crowne, Emir: Anything but Tired: The Doctrine of Exhaustion in Canada, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 11/2015, pp. 801–802.Google Scholar

Cuevas, Michel Olmedo: Copyright: Dutch Copyright Succumbs to Aging as Exhaustion Extends to E-Books, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 1/2015a, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar

Cuevas, Michel Olmedo: Hot News: Amsterdam Court of Appeal Gives Tom Kabinet Three Days to Shut Down, The 1709 Blog, January 20, 2015b (http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/hot-news-amsterdam-court-of-appeal.html).Google Scholar

Dannreuther, Anna: Freedom to Contract Prevails: Anyone Can Bear the Cost of the Artist's Resale Royalty, European Law Reporter, Issue 1/2015, pp. 2–7.Google Scholar

Davis, Nakimuli: Reselling Digital Music: Is There a Digital First Sale Doctrine?, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 29/2009: pp. 363–373.Google Scholar

de Beer, Jeremy, and Burri, Mira: Transatlantic Copyright Comparisons: Making Available via Hyperlinks in the European Union and Canada, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 2/2014, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar

Degner, Andrew: Wise-ing Up about the First Sale Doctrine: A Look at the Ninth Circuit's Approach to Vernor v. Autodesk, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 35/2012: pp. 581–606.Google Scholar

de la Durantaye, Katharina, and Kuschel, Linda: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz – Josef Kohler, UsedSoft, and Beyond, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 195–217.Google Scholar

de la Merced, Michael J.: Pandora, Faded Star of Online Music, Gets Cash Infusion from Sirius XM, The New York Times, June 9, 2017 (www.nytimes.com/2017/06/09/business/dealbook/pandora.html).Google Scholar

Derclaye, Estelle: The Legal Protection of Databases – A Comparative Analysis, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008.Google Scholar

Desurmont, Thierry: The Author's Right to Control the Destination of Copies Reproducing His Work, Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur, Issue 4/1984, pp. 2–69.Google Scholar

Determann, Lothar, and Fellmeth, Aaron Xavier: Don't Judge a Sale by Its License: Software Transfers under the First Sale Doctrine in the United States and the European Community, University of San Francisco Law Review, Fall 2001, pp. 1–107.Google Scholar

Determann, Lothar, and Nimmer, David: Software Copyright's Oracle from the Cloud, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Spring 2015, pp. 161–211.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Askan, and Zimmerman, Robert: Customs Seizure Proceedings in the European Union and the United States, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 4/2014, pp. 276–286.Google Scholar

Dietz, Adolf: The Possible Harmonization of Copyright Law within the European Community, ICC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 10/1979, pp. 395–411.Google Scholar

Dietz, Adolf: The Harmonization of Copyright in the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 4/1985, pp. 379–411.Google Scholar

Dobson, Monica L.: Comment: ReDigi and the Resale of Digital Media: The Courts Reject a Digital First Sale Doctrine and Sustain the Imbalance between Copyright Owners and Consumers, Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 7/2015: pp. 179–211.Google Scholar

Doi, Teruo: Japan: Copyright – Whether Computer Games Are Cinematographic Works – Exhaustion of Distribution Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 9/2002, pp. N147–148.Google Scholar

Donatello, Gary: Killing the Secondary Market: How the Ninth Circuit Interpreted Vernor and Aftermath to Destroy the First Sale Doctrine, Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, Vol. 22/2012: pp. 59–92.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Darren E.: Parallel Trade and International Harmonization of the Exhaustion of Rights Doctrine, Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, Issue 2/1997, pp. 445–515.Google Scholar

Donohue, James P.: The Use of Copyright Laws to Prevent the Importation of “Genuine Goods,” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Spring 1986, pp. 183–204.Google Scholar

Dredge, Stuart: Spotify Financial Results Show Struggle to Make Streaming Music Profitable, The Guardian, May 11, 2015 (www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/11/spotify-financial-results-streaming-music-profitable).Google Scholar

Dreier, Thomas: Online and Its Effect on the “Goods” versus “Services” Distinction, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 2/2013, pp. 137–139.Google Scholar

Dreier, Thomas, and Leistner, Matthias: Urheberrecht im Internet: die Forschungsherausforderungen, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 9/2013, pp. 887–888.Google Scholar

Dreier, Thomas, and Schulze, Gernot: Urheberrechtsgesetz, Vol. 4. Auflage/C. H. Beck, München, 2013.Google Scholar

DuBoff, Leonard D., King, Christy A., and Murray, Michael D.: Art Law in a Nutshell, 5th ed., West Academic, St. Paul, 2017.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, Thomas: IP Protection for Graphical User Interfaces in the EU, US and China, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 10/2015, pp. 767–774.Google Scholar

Dyekjaer, Karen: Internet Sales into the EU of Fake “Replicas,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 7/2014, pp. 550–551.Google Scholar

Eichelberger, Jan: Das urheberrechtliche Verbreitungsrecht (§ 17 Abs. 1 UrhG) nach den Entscheidungen EuGH Peek & Cloppenburg/Cassina und BGH – Le Corbusier-Möbel II, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2011, pp. 403–434.Google Scholar

Eichelberger, Jan: (Wieder-) Ausdehnung des urheberrechtlichen Verbreitungsrechts durch den EuGH?, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 12/2012, pp. 954–959.Google Scholar

Eisnach, Michael: Omega v. Costco: An Unprecedented Decision without Precedent, ABA Section of International Law, International Intellectual Property Newsletter, Spring 2011: p. 4.Google Scholar

Elio, Anthony: The Rise and Fall of Pokémon Go, Innovation & Technology Today, December 5, 2016 (https://innotechtoday.com/rise-fall-pokemon-go/).Google Scholar

Espantaleon, Jaime: Exhaustion Light in European Television, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2010, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar

Etherington, Darrell: Apple Patents a System for the Resale and Transfer of “Used” Digital Goods, Techcrunch, March 7, 2013 (http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/07/apple-patents-a-system-for-the-resale-and-transfer-of-used-digital-goods/).Google Scholar

Evans, Whitney: 4 Hollywood Studios Sue Utah Movie Editing Service VidAngel, Desert News, June 10, 2016 (www.deseretnews.com/article/865656008/Major-Hollywood-studios-sue-movie-editing-service-VidAngel.html).Google Scholar

Evans, Mark, and Prévost, Geneviève: Copyright Licensing Not the Answer to Grey Imports, Managing Intellectual Property, September 2007, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar

Fagundes, David: Property Rhetoric and the Public Domain, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94/2010: pp. 652–705.Google Scholar

Feiler, Lukas: Birth of the First-Download Doctrine: The Application of the First-Sale Doctrine to Internet Downloads under EU and U.S. Copyright Law, Journal of Internet Law, October 2012, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

Fennelly, Nial: Rules and Exceptions: Freedom of Movement and Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Hansen, Hugh C. (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 5, Juris, Huntington, 2003: pp. 33-1–33-19.Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Current Issues of Exhaustion of Rights (Kirtsaeng & Quality King, ReDigi v. UsedSoft), Copyright See-Saw, January 28, 2014a (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=55).Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and Glossary of Copyright and Related Rights Terms, Publication 891(E), World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO Treaties, Their Interpretation and Implementation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: The Spring 1997 Horace S. Manges Lecture – Copyright for the Digital Era: The WIPO “Internet” Treaties, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Spring–Summer 1997, pp. 197–223.Google Scholar

Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Svensson: Honest Attempt at Establishing Due Balance Concerning the Use of Hyperlinks – Spoiled by the Erroneous “New Public” Theory, Copyright See-Saw Blog, May 4, 2014b (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=63).Google Scholar

Fiegerman, Seth: Netflix Nears 100 Million Subscribers, CNN Tech, April 17, 2017 (http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/17/technology/netflix-subscribers/).Google Scholar

Figliomeni, Marco: The Song Remains the Same: Preserving the First Sale Doctrine for a Secondary Market of Digital Music, Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, November 2014, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar

Frankel, Susy: Tangible Meets the Intangible: International Trade in Intellectual Property. In: Lai, Jessica C. and Dominicé, Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 204–224.Google Scholar

Frankel, Susy, and Gervais, Daniel: International Intellectual Property Rules and Parallel Imports. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 85–105.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton: Price Theory, 4th printing, Transaction, New Brunswick, 2008.Google Scholar

Gadd, Ian: The Stationers’ Company in England before 1710. In: Alexander, Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 81–95.Google Scholar

Gardner, Eriq: “Weird Al” Yankovic Settles $5 Million Lawsuit against Sony Music, The Hollywood Reporter, December 18, 2013 (www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/weird-al-yankovic-settles-5–666550).Google Scholar

Gaster, Jens: “Obtinere” of Data in the Eyes of the ECJ – How to Interpret the Database Directive after British Horseracing Board Ltd et al. v. William Hill Organisation Ltd, Computer und Recht: International, Issue 3/2005, pp. 129–135.Google Scholar

Gaubiac, Yves: The Exhaustion of Rights in the Analogue and Digital Environment, Copyright Bulletin, Issue 4/2002, pp. 2–15.Google Scholar

Gautam, S. Zubin: The Murky Waters of First Sale: Price Discrimination and Downstream Control in the Wake of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 29/2014: pp. 717–758.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe: Der urheberrechtliche Interessenausgleich in der Informationsgesellschaft – Zur Rechtsnatur der Beschränkungen des Urheberrechts, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht International, Issue 10/2004, pp. 815–821.Google Scholar

Geist, Rachel Ann: A “Licence to Read”: The Effect of E-books on Publishers, Libraries and the First Sale Doctrine, IDEA, Vol. 52/2012: pp. 63–100.Google Scholar

Gervais, Daniel J.: Copyright, Culture and the Cloud. In: Pager, Sean A. and Candeub, Adam (Eds.): Transnational Culture in the Internet Age, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2012: pp. 31–54.Google Scholar

Ghosh, Shubha: The Implementation of Exhaustion Policies – Lessons from National Experiences, Issue Paper 40, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, 2013.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C.: Four Reasons and a Paradox: The Manifest Superiority of Copyright over Sui Generic Protection of Computer Software, Columbia Law Review, December 1994: pp. 2559–2572.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C.: Hyperlinking and “Making Available,” European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/2014, pp. 147–148.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C., and Treppoz, Edouard: International CopyrightLaw – U.S. and E.U. Perspectives, Text and Cases, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.Google Scholar

Gladwell, David: The Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 12/1986, pp. 366–370.Google Scholar

Göbel, Alexander: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Downloaded Software – The UsedSoft v. Oracle Case [UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corporation, ECJ (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 3 July 2012, C-128/11], European Law Reporter, Issue 9/2012, pp. 226–234.Google Scholar

Goetzel, Dwayne K.: Recent Developments in Copyright Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Spring 1999, pp. 445–461.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Melissa: A Textbook Dilemma: Should the First Sale Doctrine Provide a Valid Defense for Foreign-Made Goods?, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 80/2012: pp. 3057–3092.Google Scholar

Goldmann, Michael, and Möller, Ralf: Anbieten und Verbreiten von Werken der angewandten Kunst nach der “Le-Corbusier-Möbel”-Entscheidung des EuGH, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 6/2009, pp. 551–558.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Paul, and Hugenholtz, P. Bernt: International Copyright – Principles, Law and Practice, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.Google Scholar

Gomber, Amit Jyoti S.: First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era. In: Sinha, Manoj Kumar and Mahalwar, Vandana (Eds.): Copyright Law in the Digital World, Springer, Singapore, 2017: pp. 251–277.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Alexis: Why the Supreme Court Said Yes to the First Sale Doctrine in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'anza Research International, Inc., University of Miami Business Law Review, Vol. 8/1999: pp. 29–46.Google Scholar

Gotzen, Frank: Distribution and Exhaustion in the EC, EuropeanIntellectual Property Review, Issue 8/1990, pp. 299–303.Google Scholar

Graber, Christoph B.: Tethered Technologies, Cloud Strategies and the Future of the First Sale/Exhaustion Defence in Copyright Law, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Issue 4/2015, pp. 389–408.Google Scholar

Granmar, Claes: Intellectual Property Rights and the Single Market, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 4/2011, pp. 321–351.Google Scholar

Gratz, Joseph: Digital Book Distribution – The End of the First-Sale Doctrine?, Landslide, May/June 2011, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Jonathan: Exhaustion and the Alteration of Copyright Works in EU Copyright Law – (C-419/13) Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, ERA Forum, Vol. 17/2016: pp. 73–84.Google Scholar

Grigoriadis, Lazaros G.: The Distribution of Software in the European Union after the Decision of the CJEU “UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp.” (“UsedSoft”), Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, Issue 3/2013, pp. 198–205.Google Scholar

Grisse, Karina, and Koroch, Stefan: The British Private Copying Exception and Its Compatibility with the Information Society Directive, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 7/2015, pp. 562–569.Google Scholar

Grützmacher, Malte: Endlich angekommen im digitalen Zeitalter!? Die Erschöpfungslehre im europäischen Urheberrecht: der gemeinsame Binnenmarkt und der Handel mit gebrauchter Software, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 1/2013, pp. 46–83.Google Scholar

Grützmacher, Malte: “Gebrauchtssoftware” und Erschöpfungsgrundlehre: zu den Rahmenbedingungen eines Second-Hand-Marktes für Software, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 4/2006, pp. 302–306.Google Scholar

Guibault, Lucie, and van ’t Klooster, Kevin: Netherlands. In: Hilty, Reto M. and Nérisson, Sylvie (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012: pp. 677–718.Google Scholar

Günther, Petteri: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Digital Music in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. and Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi, Inc. Cases, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 3/2014, pp. 205–229.Google Scholar

Haberstumpf, Helmut: Der Handel mit gebrauchter Software im harmonisierten Urheberrecht – Warum der Ansatz des EuGH einen falschen Weg zeigt, Computer und Recht, Issue 9/2012, pp. 561–572.Google Scholar

Haberstumpf, Helmut: Josef Kohler und die Erschöpfungslehre, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2014, pp. 470–496.Google Scholar

Halpern, Marcelo, Kapgan, Yury, and Yu, Kathy: Vernor v. Autodesk: Software and the First Sale Doctrine under Copyright Law, Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, Vol. 23/2011: pp. 7–10.Google Scholar

Hamborg, Benjamin: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng: the Uncertain Future of the First-Sale Doctrine, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, Vol. 13/2012: pp. 899–924.Google Scholar

Hansen, William R., and Morales, Suzanne M. M.: John Wiles & Sons Case: Limits on the First Sale Doctrine on U.S. Copyright Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 8/2012, pp. 558–563.Google Scholar

Harmon, Steph, and Clark, Lucy: Magda Szubanski May Leave Australia If Changes to Book Industry Go Ahead, The Guardian, May 20, 2016 (www.theguardian.com/books/2016/may/20/authors-condemn-book-copyright-and-import-proposal-as-massive-own-goal).Google Scholar

Harris, Keith: For Promotional Use Only: Is the Resale of a Promotional CD Protected by the First Sale Doctrine?, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 30/2009: pp. 1745–1772.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Thomas: Weiterverkauf und “Verleih” online vertriebener Inhalte – Zugleich Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 3. Juli 2012, Rs. C-128/11 – UsedSoft./. Oracle, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 11/2012, pp. 980–989.Google Scholar

Hauck, Ronny: Digitale Inhalte – Verkehrsfähigkeit oder Lizenzketten?, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 1/2017, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar

Hauck, Ronny, Hofmann, Franz, and Zech, Herbert: Verkehrsfähigkeit digitaler Güter, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 141–148.Google Scholar

Heath, Christopher: Parallel Imports and International Trade, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1997, pp. 623–632.Google Scholar

Helberger, Natali, Huygen, Annelies, and van Eijk, Nico: Ups and Downs – Economic and Cultural Effects of File Sharing on Music, Film and Games, Culture and Science, Economic Affairs and Justice, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper 2012-33, Institute for Information Law Research Paper 2012-27, February 2009.Google Scholar

Helft, Miguel: Netflix to Deliver Movies to the PC, New York Times, January 16, 2007 (www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/technology/16netflix.html).Google Scholar

Hess, Evan: Code-ifying Copyright: An Architectural Solution to Digitally Expanding the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review, March 2013: pp. 1965–2011.Google Scholar

Heun-Rehn, Stefan Lars-Thoren, and Wagner, Eva: Das Folgerecht nach dem Tod des Künstlers – Erste Vorabentscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, European Law Reporter, Issue 7/2010, pp. 212–218.Google Scholar

Hieger, Barbara: Verletzung von Marken- und Urheberrechten durch Versand rechtsverletzender Ware aus Drittstaat in die EU, Ecolex, Vol. 25/2014: p. 548.Google Scholar

Hill, Brad: Pandora Earnings: Revenue Growth, Gross Profit, Net Loss, and Savaged Stock, Radio and Internet News, October 23, 2015 (http://rainnews.com/pandora-earnings-revenue-growth-gross-profit-net-loss-and-savaged-stock/).Google Scholar

Hilty, Reto M.: “Exhaustion” in the digital age. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 64–82.Google Scholar

Hilty, Reto M., and Sylvie, Nérisson (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012.Google Scholar

Hoeren, Thomas: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz bei Software – Körperliche Übertragung und Folgeprobleme, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 8/2010a, pp. 665–673.Google Scholar

Hoeren, Thomas: Die Online-Erschöpfung im Softwarebereich – Fallgruppen und Beweislast, Multimedia und Recht, Issue 7/2010b, pp. 447–450.Google Scholar

Hoeren, Thomas, and Försterling, Matthias: Onlinevertrieb “gebrauchter“ Software – Hintergründe und Konsequenzen der EuGH-Entscheidung “UsedSoft,” Multimedia und Recht, Issue 10/2012, pp. 642–647.Google Scholar

Hoffelder, Nate: Publishers Lose First Round of Lawsuit against Used eBook Marketplace, The Digital Reader, July 21, 2014a (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/07/21/publishers-lose-first-round-lawsuit-used-ebook-marketplace/).Google Scholar

Hoffelder, Nate: Used eBook Website Launches in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 19, 2014b (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/19/used-ebook-website-launches-europe/).Google Scholar

Hoffelder, Nate: Used eBook Website Faces Lawsuit in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 27, 2014c (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/27/used-ebook-website-faces-lawsuit-europe/).Google Scholar

Hofmann, Franz: Grundsatz der Technikneutralität im Urheberrecht? Zugleich Gedanken zu einem more technological approach, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2016: pp. 482–512.Google Scholar

Hojnik, Janja: Technology Neutral EU Law: Digital Goods within the Traditional Goods/Services Distinction, International Journal of Law and IT, Vol. 25/2017: pp. 63–84.Google Scholar

Horowitz, David H.: The Record Rental Amendment of 1984: A Case Study in the Effort to Adapt Copyright Law to New Technology, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & Arts, March 1988: pp. 31–72.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert: Post-Sale Restraings and Competitive Harm: The First Sale Doctrine in Perspective, New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 66/2011: pp. 487–547.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, Bernt: Harmonization or Unification of EU Copyright Law. In: Axhamn, Johan (Ed.): Copyright in a Borderless Online Environment, The Institute for Legal Research, 2012: pp. 189–204.Google Scholar

P. Bernt, Hugenholtz, Antoon, Quaedvlieg, and Dirk, Visser (Eds.): A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912–2012, deLex, Amsterdam, 2012.Google Scholar

Hunnings, N. March (Ed.): Industrial Property Cases from Common Market Law Reports, Common Law Reports Ltd., London, 1973.Google Scholar

Hyland, Mark: The Football Association Premier League Ruling – the Bosman of Exclusive Broadcasting Rights?, Communications Law, Issue 1/2012, pp. 7–13.Google Scholar

IFPI: Global Music Report – Annual State of the Industry, 2017 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2017.pdf).Google Scholar

IFPI: Global Music Report – Music Consumption Exploding Worldwide, State of the Industry Overview, 2016 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2016.pdf).Google Scholar

Ikeler, Kim: Sony v. Universal City Studios: Can the Marketplace Relationship between Creator and Consumer Be Preserved?, Denver University Law Review, Vol. 62/1985: pp. 873–897.Google Scholar

Ingham, Tim: iTunes: Music, Movie, TV and e-Book Sales Drop 7%, Music Business Worldwide, January 30, 2015 (www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/itunes-music-movie-tv-e-book-sales-drop-7/).Google Scholar

International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law: Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, Issue 4/1982, pp. 415–430.Google Scholar

Jankowski, Donald Frank: The End of Ownership?, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 14/2013: pp. 103–121.Google Scholar

Joliet, René: Patented Articles and the Free Movement of Goods within the EEC, Current Legal Problems, Issue 1/1975, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar

Jolly, Ieuan, and Westmoreland, Jill: Case Comment: Can You Sell “Used” Music Purchased on iTunes – the ReDigi Decision, Entertainment Law Review, Issue 5/2013, pp. 180–182.Google Scholar

Joyce, Craig P., and Patterson, L. Ray: Copyright in 1791: An Essay Concerning the Founders’ View of the Copyright Power Granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 52/2003: pp. 909–952.Google Scholar

Kaczanowska, Agata: IBISWorld Industry Report 53223: DVD, Game & Video Rental in the US, May 2011 (www.ibisworld.com/industry/default.aspx?indid=1370).Google Scholar

Kaltner, Jonathan: Zum EuGH-Urteil “Phil Collins,” Ecolex, Vol. 5/1994: pp. 33–34.Google Scholar

Karjala, Dennis S.: “Copying” and “Piracy” in the Digital Age, Washburn Law Journal, Spring 2013, pp. 245–266.Google Scholar

Karmel, Dan: Off the Wall: Abandonment and the First Sale Doctrine, Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, Spring 2012, pp. 353–378.Google Scholar

Karnell, Gunnar W. G.: Exhaustion of Copyright – Swedish Law in a European Setting, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 6/1999, pp. 654–660.Google Scholar

Kass, Sean M.: Misinterpreting the Record Rental Amendment: Brilliance Audio v. Haights Cross Communications, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 21/2007: pp. 297–319.Google Scholar

Katz, Ariel, Perzanowski, Aaron, and Rub, Guy A.: The Interaction of Exhaustion and the General Law: A Reply to Duffy and Hynes, Virginia Law Review Online, Vol. 102/2016, pp. 8–24.Google Scholar

Katzenberger, Paul: The Droit de Suite in Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 3–4/1973, pp. 361–375.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Anthony: The Vanishing: The Demise of VHS, and the Movies Disappearing Along with It, Museum Moving Image, February 26, 2009 (www.movingimagesource.us/articles/the-vanishing-20090226).Google Scholar

Kawabata, B. Makoa: Unresolved Textual Tension: Capitol Records v. ReDigi and a Digital First Sale Doctrine, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Winter 2014, pp. 33–78.Google Scholar

Keeling, David T.: Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law, Vol. 1, Free Movement and Competition Law, Oxford EC Law Library, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.Google Scholar

Kerber, Wolfgang: Exhaustion of Digital Goods: An Economic Perspective, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016: pp. 149–169.Google Scholar

Khoury, May: Exhausted Yet? The First-Sale Doctrine and the Second-Hand Market for Software Licenses in the European Union, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Issue 3/2014, pp. 45–57.Google Scholar

Knopf, Howard P.: Parallel Imports & the Internet: Bits, Borders, Barriers & Exhaustion. In: Hansen, Hugh C. (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001: pp. 113-1–113-66.Google Scholar

Koehler, Philipp: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz des Urheberrechts im Online-Bereich, C. H. Beck, München, 2000.Google Scholar

Kohler, Joseph: Das Authorrecht – Eine zivilistische Abhandlung, Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1880.Google Scholar

Koktvedgaard, Mogens: The Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in the Law of Intellectual Property, Especially Copyright Law, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 3/1982, pp. 355–362.Google Scholar

Kon, Stephen, and Heide, Thomas: BHB/William Hill: Europe's Feist. Court of Appeal Confirmation Establishes Bright Lines, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2006, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar

Kremen, Hillary A.: Caveat Venditor: International Application of the First Sale Doctrine, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Vol. 23/1997: pp. 161–185.Google Scholar

Kretsinger, Marilyn J.: Droit de Suite: The Artist's Right to a Resale Royalty, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Summer 1993: pp. 967–978.Google Scholar

Kur, Annette: Händlerwerbung für Markenartikel aus urheberrechtlicher Sicht – Präsentationsrecht als neue Schutzschranke?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 1/1999, pp. 24–30.Google Scholar

Laddie, Hugh, Prescott, Peter, Vitoria, Mary, Speck, Adrian, and Lane, Lindsay: The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs, Vol. 2, Butterworths, London, 2000.Google Scholar

LaFrance, Mary: Global Issues in Copyright Law, West Academic, St. Paul, 2009.Google Scholar

LaFrance, Mary: Using Trademark Law to Override Copyright's First Sale Rule for Imported Copies in the United States. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 390–407.Google Scholar

Lauterbach, Thorsten: Copyright Law Trumps Free Movement of Unlawfully Distributed Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 1/2013, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar

Leahy, Brandon: Supreme Indecision: Copyright's First Sale Doctrine in the Gray Aftermath of Costco v. Omega, Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, Fall 2011: pp. 45–67.Google Scholar

Lee, Yin Harn: UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. (Case C-128/11) – Sales of “Used” Software and the Principle of Exhaustion, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 7/2012, pp. 846–853.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Michael: Digitisation and Copyright Agreements. In: Stamatoudi, Irini A. and Torremans, Paul L. C. (Eds.): Copyright in the New Digital Environment: The Need to Redesign Copyright, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2000: pp. 193–204.Google Scholar

Leiss, Ludwig: Verlagsgesetz – Kommentar mit Vertragmustern, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1973.Google Scholar

Leistner, Matthias: Gebrauchtsoftware auf dem Weg nach Luxemburg – Der Vorlagebeschluss des BGH in Sachen Oracle v. UsedSoft, Computer und Recht, Issue 4/2011a, pp. 209–215.Google Scholar

Leistner, Matthias: “Used” Software before Europe's Top Court – the German Federal Supreme Court Refers the Oracle v. UsedSoft Case to the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/2011b, pp. 503–506.Google Scholar

Lejeune, Mathias: Remarks to USA: No Second Hand Digital Music (Yet), Computer Law Review International, Issue 3/2013, pp. 88–90.Google Scholar

Leong, Terence: When the Software We Buy Is Not Actually Ours: An Analysis of Vernor v. Autodesk on the First Sale Doctrine and Essential Step Defense, Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, January 2012, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

Lindey, Alexander, and Landau, Michael: Lindey on Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts, 3rd ed., Thomson Reuters, 2016.Google Scholar

Linklater, Emma: UsedSoft and the Big Bang Theory: Is the e-Exhaustion Meteor about to Strike?, JIPITEC, Issue 1/2014, pp. 12–22.Google Scholar

Lipton, Jacqueline: Rethinking Cyberlaw – A New Vision for Internet Law, Eward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.Google Scholar

Litman, Jessica: Digital Copyright, Prometheus Books, Amherst, 2006.Google Scholar

Liu, Joseph P.: Owning Digital Copies: Copyright Law and the Incidents of Copy Ownership, William and Mary Law Review, April 2001: pp. 1245–1366.Google Scholar

Loewenheim, Ulrich (Ed.): Handbuch des Urheberrechts, Vol. 2. Auflage/C. H. Beck, München, 2010.Google Scholar

Long, Doris Estelle: Deviant Globalization: The Next Step in the Multilateral Protection of Intellectual Property. In: Weckström, Katja (Ed.): Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, Private Law Series A:132, University of Turku Faculty of Law, Turku, 2013: pp. 49–84.Google Scholar

Long, Doris Estelle: Globalization: A Future Trend or a Satisfying Mirage, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 49/2001: pp. 313–343.Google Scholar

Long, Henry Sprott: Reconsidering the “Balance” of the “Digital First Sale” Debate: Re-examining the Case for a Statutory Digital First Sale Doctrine to Facilitate Second-Hand Digital Media Markets, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 59/2008: pp. 1183–1201.Google Scholar

Longdin, Louise: Making the Most of Article 6: Parallel Importing in Australia and New Zealand. In: Hansen, Hugh C. (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001: pp. 112-1–112-38.Google Scholar

Longdin, Louise, and Lim, Pheh Hoon: Inexhaustible Distribution Rights for Copyright Owners and the Foreclosure of Secondary Markets for Used Software, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Issue 5/2013, pp. 541–567.Google Scholar

Longdin, Louise, and Lim, Pheh Hoon: Sale versus Licence Offline and Online: Can Competition Law Bridge the Doctrinal Gap? Sale versus Licence Offline and Online, International Journal of Law and IT, Issue 4/2014, pp. 311–333.Google Scholar

Loughlan, Patricia: “You Wouldn't Steal a Car”: Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 29/2007: pp. 401–405.Google Scholar

Lucas, André: Copyright in the European Community: The Green Paper and the Proposal for a Directive Concerning Legal Protection of Computer Programs, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 29/1991: pp. 145–167.Google Scholar

Maclean, Fiona: European Union (CJEU) has delivered its long-awaited decision in UsedSoft v. Oracle International Corp., Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Issue 1/2013, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

Maggioni, Ilaria: Kirtsaeng v. Wiley Incentivizes Digital Distribution, les Nouvelles, December 2013, pp. 260–262.Google Scholar

Maher, Imelda: Trade Marks & International Exhaustion, The Bar Review, Vol. 5/2000: pp. 243–246.Google Scholar

Malovic, Nedim: Copyright: Distribution Right Encompasses Advertisement for Sale of Copyright Works, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 12/2015, pp. 895–896.Google Scholar

Matthews, Brander: The Evolution of Copyright, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 5/1890: pp. 583–602.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Jeff A.: Recent Copyright Case Law Development, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 5/1997: pp. 293–317.Google Scholar

McIntyre, Hugh: Spotify Officially Hits 50 Million Paid Subscribers, Forbes, March 3, 2017 (www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/03/03/spotify-officially-hits-50-million-paying-subscribers/).Google Scholar

McKenzie, Elizabeth: A Book by Any Other Name: E-Books and the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 12/2013: pp. 57–73.Google Scholar

Menell, Peter S.: In Search of Copyright's Lost Ark: Interpreting the Right to Distribute in the Internet Age, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, Vol. 59/2012: pp. 201–267.Google Scholar

Merryman, John Henry: The Wrath of Robert Rauschenberg, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Winter 1993, pp. 103–127.Google Scholar

Meurer, Michael J.: Coypright Law and Price Discrimination, Cardozo Law Review, November 2001: pp. 55–148.Google Scholar

Mezei, Péter: The Painter, the One Horn Cow and Ole Hank Wilson's Back Lot – The Future of Library Digitization in the European Union and Hungary, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 5/2015, pp. 535–562.Google Scholar

Miller, Esti: NAFTA: Protector of National Intellectual Property Rights or Blueprint for Globalization? The Effect of NAFTA on the First Sale Doctrine in Copyright Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 16/1995: pp. 475–511.Google Scholar

Mohn, Ludwig: Juristische Hilfsbücher für Studium und Praxis, Springer, Berlin, 1919.Google Scholar

Mok, M. Robert: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights: EC-wide or Worldwide? In: Schulze, Reiner (Ed.): Auslegung europäischen Privatrechts und angeglichenen Rechts, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 1999: pp. 89–95.Google Scholar

Morris, P. Sean: Beyond Trade: Global Digital Exhaustion in International Economic Regulation, Campbell Law Review, Fall 2013, pp. 118–124.Google Scholar

Mosley, C. Todd: Mourning the Loss of Copyright's Unsung Hero: Destruction of the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 14/2015: pp. 235–262.Google Scholar

Mount, Dan: A Review of Public Library E-Lending Models, Civic Agenda European Unit, December 2014 (www.bibliotheksportal.de/fileadmin/user_upload/content/bibliotheken/international/Study_Public_Library_E-Lending_Models_2014.pdf).Google Scholar

Moyse, Pierre-Emmanuel: From Importation to Digital Exhaustion: A Canadian Copyright Perspective. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 478–497.Google Scholar

Mtima, Lateef: So Dark the CON(TU) of Man: The Quet for a Software Derivative Work Right in Section 117, University of Pittsburg Law Review, Vol. 70/2008, pp. 1–100.Google Scholar

Mueller-Langer, Frank: Copyright and parallel trade. In: Watt, Richard (Ed.): Handbook on the Economics of Copyright – A Guide for Students and Teachers, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014: pp. 287–310.Google Scholar

Mulligan, Deirdre K., and Schultz, Jason M.: Neglecting the National Memory: How Copyright Term Extensions Compromise the Development of Digital Archives, Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 4/2002: pp. 451–473.Google Scholar

Muñoz, Rodolphe, Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited. Judgment of 19 March 1998, [1998]ECR I-1251, Common Market Law Review, Issue 4/1999, pp. 831–839.Google Scholar

Mutimear, Jane: Merck v Primecrown: The Challenge to Merck v Stephar, European Competition Law Review, Issue 2/1996, pp. 185–188.Google Scholar

Mylly, Tuomas: A Silhouette of Fortress Europe? International Exhaustion of Trade Mark Rights in the EU, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 7/2000: pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Mylly, Ulla-Maija: Harmonizing Copyright Rules for Computer Program Interface Protection, University of Louisville Law Review, Vol. 48/2010: pp. 877–908.Google Scholar

Navarro, Arthur I.: Selected Recent Developments in Copyright, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 3/1995: pp. 107–114.Google Scholar

Naylor, David, and Parris, Emily: After ReDigi: Contrasting the EU and US Approaches to the Re-sale of Second-Hand Digital Assets, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 8/2013, pp. 487–490.Google Scholar

Nimmer, Melville B., and Nimmer, David: Nimmer on Copyright, Matthew Bender, 2013.Google Scholar

Norman, Helen: Parallel Imports from Non-EEA Member States: The Vision Remains Unclear, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 4/2000, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar

Norman, Helen: Perfume, Whisky and Leaping Cats of Prey: A UK Perspective on Three Recent Trade Mark Cases before the European Court of Justice, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 8/1998, pp. 306–312.Google Scholar

Nowak, Peter: Netflix Launches Canadian Movie Service, CBCNews, September 22, 2010 (www.cbc.ca/news/technology/netflix-launches-canadian-movie-service-1.872505).Google Scholar

O'Connor, Sean M.: The Overlooked French Influence on the Intellectual Property Clause, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 82/2015: pp. 733–830.Google Scholar

Oliar, Dotan: Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress as a Limitation on Congress's Intellectual Property Power, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94/2006: pp. 1771–1845.Google Scholar

O'Neill, Megan: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, Social Times, March 1, 2011, www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankrupted-and-destroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3.Google Scholar

Opri, Debra A.: Video Rentals and the First Sale Doctrine: The Deficiency of Proposed Legislation, Whittier Law Review, Vol. 8/1986: pp. 331–352.Google Scholar

Overdijk, Tjerd, van der Putt, Polo, de Vries, Eva, and Schafft, Thomas: Exhaustion and Software Resale Rights – A Comparison between the European Exhaustion Doctrine and the U.S. First Sale Doctrine in the Light of Recent Case Law, Computer Law Review International, Issue 2/2011, pp. 33–39.Google Scholar

Owen, Laura: Like Amazon, Apple Wants to Create a Marketplace for Used Digital Goods, Gigaom, March 8, 2013 (https://gigaom.com/2013/03/08/like-amazon-apple-wants-to-create-a-marketplace-for-used-digital-goods/).Google Scholar

Pagenberg, Jochen: The Exhaustion Principle and “Silhouette” Case, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Issue 1/1999, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar

Pahlow, Louis: Lizenzen als handelbare Güter? Nutzungrecht und Nutzunggegenstand im Softwareverkehr, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 2/2016, pp. 218–238.Google Scholar

Pallante, Maria A.: The Next Great Copyright Act, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 36/2013: pp. 315–344.Google Scholar

Parker, James: Comparing Strategies of the 2d Punic War: Rome's Strategic Victory over the Tactical/Operational Genius, Hannibal Barca, USAWC Strategy Research Project, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, 2001 (www.iwar.org.uk/military/resources/hannibal/Parker_J_P_01.pdf).Google Scholar

Patry, William: Copyright Law and Practice, Vol. 2, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC, 1994.Google Scholar

Patry, William: In Praise of the Betamax Decision: An Examination of Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of America, South Texas Law Journal, Vol. 22/1982: pp. 211–248.Google Scholar

Patry, William: Patry on Copyright, Thomson Reuters, 2016.Google Scholar

Patterson, L. Ray, Birch, Stanley F., and Joyce, Craig: A Unified Theory of Copyright – Chapter 2: The Copyright Clause and Copyright History, Houston Law Review, Vol. 46/2009: pp. 215–397.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, Shira: Resale Royalties for Artists: An Alanysis of the Register of Copyrights’ Report, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 40/1983: pp. 284–314.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Hoofnagle, Chris Jay: What We Buy When We Buy Now, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, January 2017, pp. 315–378.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: Digital Exhaustion, UCLA Law Review, April 2011, pp. 889–946.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: The End of Ownership – Personal Property in the Digital Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar

Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: Legislating Digital Exhaustion, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Symposium 2014, pp. 1535–1557.Google Scholar

Petty, M. Elizabeth: Rauschenberg, Royalties, and Artists’ Rights: Potential Droit de Suite Legislation in the United States, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Issue 3/2014, pp. 977–1009.Google Scholar

Pickton, Miggie: Ebook Price Increases from Three Publishers, Research Support Hub, July 5, 2013 (https://researchsupporthub.northampton.ac.uk/2013/07/05/ebook-price-increases-from-three-publishers/).Google Scholar

Pitell, Lisa R.: Non-transferability of Software Licences in the European Union, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 9/2004, pp. 390–401.Google Scholar

Puig, Antoni Rubí: Copyright Exhaustion Rationales and Used Software – A Law and Economics Approach to Oracle v. UsedSoft, JIPITEC, Issue 3/2013, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar

Rahmatian, Andreas: A Comparison of German Moveable Property Law and English Personal Property Law, Journal of Comparative Law, Issue 1/2010, pp. 197–248.Google Scholar

Ramalho, Ana: Copyright Law-Making in the EU: What Lies under the “International Market” Mask?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 3/2014, pp. 208–224.Google Scholar

Rauer, Nils, and Ettig, Diana: Can e-Books and Other Digital Works Be Resold?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 9/2015, pp. 713–716.Google Scholar

Reddy, Michael B.: The Droit de Suite: Why American Fine Artists Should Have the Right to a Resale Royalty, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 15/1995: pp. 509–546.Google Scholar

Reese, R. Anthony: The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks, Boston College Law Review, March 2003: pp. 577–652.Google Scholar

Rehbinder, Manfred: Urheberrecht, 15., neubearbeitete Auflage, C. H. Beck, München, 2008.Google Scholar

Reimer, Dietrich: Copyright Law and the Free Movement of Goods, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 4/1981, pp. 493–511.Google Scholar

Reimer, Dietrich: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz im Urheberrecht und gewerblichen Rechtsschutz unter Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 6/1972: pp. 221–234.Google Scholar

Reimer, Dietrich: Principle of Exhaustion of Rights, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 3/1982, pp. 362–367.Google Scholar

Reinbothe, Jörg: The EC Directive on Rental and Lending Rights and Rights Related to Copyright. In: Cohen Jehoram, Herman, Keuchenius, Petra, and Seignette, Jacqueline (Eds.): Audiovisual Media and Copyright in Europe, Kluwer, Deventer, 1999: pp. 41–51.Google Scholar

Reinbothe, Jörg, and von Lewinski, Silke: The WIPO Treaties 1996 – The WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, Commentary and Legal Analysis, Butterworths Lexis Nexis, London, 2002.Google Scholar

Reiner, Richard F.: Home Videorecording: Fair Use or Infringement?, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 52/1978–1979: pp. 573–634.Google Scholar

Reis, Sarah: Toward a “Digital Transfer Doctrine”? The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 109/2015: pp. 173–208.Google Scholar

Reischl, Gerhard: Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 13/1982, pp. 415–430.Google Scholar

Richelieu, William: Gray Days Ahead? The Impact of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'anza Research International, Inc., Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 27/2000: pp. 827–859.Google Scholar

Ricketson, Sam: Proposed International Treaty on Droit de Suite/Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists, Revue Internationale de Droit d'Auteur, Issue 3/2015, pp. 3–263.Google Scholar

Ricketson, Sam: WIPO Study in Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment, Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Ninth Session, Geneva, June 23–27, 2003 (www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_9/sccr_9_7.pdf).Google Scholar

Ricketson, Sam, and Ginsburg, Jane C.: International Copyrights and Neighboring Rights – Berne Convention and Beyond, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.Google Scholar

Riehl, Damien, and Kassim, Jumi: Is “Buying” Digital Content Just “Renting” for Life? Contemplating a Digital First-Sale Doctrine, William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 40/2014: pp. 783–812.Google Scholar

Rigamonti, Cyrill P.: Der Handel mit Gebrauchtsoftware nach schweizerischem Urheberrecht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 43/2009: pp. 14–27.Google Scholar

Roa, John C.: Gray Market Goods and the First Sale Doctrine: The Last Nail in the Coffin?, Mississippi College Law Review, Vol. 20/1999: pp. 211–234.Google Scholar

Rognstad, Ole-Andreas: Legally Flawed but Politically Sound? Digital Exhaustion of Copyright in Europe after UsedSoft, Oslo Law Review, Issue 1/2014, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Rosati, Eleonora: Online Copyright Exhaustion in a Post-Allposters World, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 9/2015, pp. 673–681.Google Scholar

Rosén, Jan: Free Trade, Competition and Copyright: Viewpoints from the Nordic EFTA Countries, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 2/1987, pp. 120–131.Google Scholar

Rothnie, Warwick A.: Parallel Imports, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1993.Google Scholar

Rothstein, Robert H., Evitt, Emily F., and Williams, Matthew: The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, March 2010, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar

Röttinger, Moritz: Copyright and the Rules on the Free Movement of Goods, Revue Internationale de Droit d'Auteur, Issue 3/1993, pp. 50–127.Google Scholar

Rub, Guy A.: The Economics of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: The Efficiency of a Balanced Approach to the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review Res Gestae, Vol. 81/2013: pp. 41–54.Google Scholar

Rub, Guy A.: Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 64/2015: pp. 741–817.Google Scholar

Rub, Guy A.: The Unconvincing Case for Resale Royalties, The Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 124/2014: pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Ruffler, Friedrich: Is Trading in Used Software an Infringement of Copyright? The Perspective of European Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 6/2011, pp. 375–383.Google Scholar

Runge, Philipp: Prinzip der gemeinschaftsweiten Erschöpfung im Urheberrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Issue 21/2006, pp. 666–667.Google Scholar

Rutz, Christian: Germany: Copyright – Exhaustion of Rights and Re-sale of Pre-installed Software, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 6/2009, pp. N48–50.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Pamela: Why Copyright Law Excludes Systems and Processes from the Scope of Its Protection, Texas Law Review, Vol. 85/2006: pp. 1921–1977.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Pamela, Vinje, Thomas, and Cornish, William: Does Copyright Protection under the EU Software Directive Extend to Computer Program Behaviour, Languages and Interfaces?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 2/2012, pp. 158–166.Google Scholar

Savič, Maša: The CJEU Allposters Case: Beginning of the End of Digital Exhaustion?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 6/2015a, pp. 389–394.Google Scholar

Savič, Maša: The Legality of Resale of Digital Content after UsedSoft in Subsequent German and CJEU Case Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 7/2015b, pp. 414–429.Google Scholar

Schack, Haimo: Urheber- und Urhebervertragsrecht, Vol. 3, neubearbeitete Auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2005.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Michael: Legal Issues in Peer-to-Peer File Sharing, Focusing on the Making Available Right. In: Strowel, Alain (Ed.): Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009: pp. 43–70.Google Scholar

Schneider, Jochen, and Spindler, Gerald: Der Kampf um die gebrauchte Software – Revolution im Urheberrecht? – Das Urteil des EuGH vom 3.7.2012 – Rs. C-128/11 – “UsedSoft” Gebrauchtsoftware, Computer und Recht, Issue 8/2012, pp. 492–493.Google Scholar

Schneider, Marius, and Maillefer, Christophe: How Europe Deals with Private Imports of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 4/2015, pp. 262–268.Google Scholar

Scholz, Jochen: Mögliche vertragliche Gestaltungen zur Weitergabe von Software nach “UsedSoft II,” Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 2/2015, pp. 142–150.Google Scholar

Schonhofen, Sven: UsedSoft and Its Aftermath: The Resale of Digital Content in the European Union, Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 16/2015, pp. 262–297.Google Scholar

Schovsbo, Jens: Constitutional Foundations and Constitutionalization of IP Law – A Tale of Different Stories?, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 4/2015: pp. 383–394.Google Scholar

Schovsbo, Jens: The Exhaustion of Rights and Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law. In: Ohly, Ansgar (Ed.): Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2010: pp. 169–187.Google Scholar

Schricker, Gerhard: Harmonization of Copyright in the European Economic Community, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Issue 4/1988, pp. 489–505.Google Scholar

Schricker, Gerhard: Harmonization of Copyright in the European Economic Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 4/1989, pp. 466–484.Google Scholar

Schricker, Gerhard: Urheberrecht – Kommentar, Vol. 3, Neubearbeitete Auflage, C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 2006.Google Scholar

Schulder, Diane B.: Art Proceeds Act: A Study of the Droit de Suite and a Proposed Enactment for the United States, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 61/1966: pp. 19–43.Google Scholar

Schulze, Ellen Franziska: Resale of Digital Content Such as Music, Films or eBooks under European Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2014, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar

Schulze, Gernot: Anspruch auf Folgerechtsvergütungen bei Tod des Urhebers, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 6/2010, pp. 529–530.Google Scholar

Scott, Mark: In Global Expansion, Netflix Makes Friends with Carriers, New York Times, February 26, 2017 (www.nytimes.com/2017/02/26/technology/netflix-streaming-expansion-mwc.html).Google Scholar

Senftleben, Martin: Die Fortschreibung des urheberrechtlichen Erschöpfungsgrundsatzes im digitalen Umfeld, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, Issue 40/2012, pp. 2924–2927.Google Scholar

Serra, Theodore: Rebalancing at Resale: ReDigi, Royalties, and the Digital Secondary Market, Boston University Law Review, October 2013, pp. 1753–1801.Google Scholar

Seville, Catherine: Developments in United Kingdom Copyright Law, Revue Internationale de Droit d'Auteur, Issue 2/2015, pp. 50–151.Google Scholar

Sheridan, Jenny Lynn: Does the Rise of Property Rights Theory Defeat Copyright's First Sale Doctrine?, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 52/2012: pp. 297–372.Google Scholar

Shinall, Michael A.: Software & Copyright Exhaustion: A Proposal to Amend §117 & Restore Balance to the Copyright System, Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 24/2014: pp. 365–405.Google Scholar

Sikich, Adam W.: Buyer Beware: The Threat to the First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age, Journal of Internet Law, January 2011, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Sisario, Ben: Site to Resell Music Files Has Critics, New York Times, November 14, 2011 (www.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/business/media/reselling-of-music-files-is-contested.html).Google Scholar

Sisario, Ben, and Russell, Karl: In Shift to Streaming, Music Business Has Lost Billions, New York Times, March 24, 2016 (www.nytimes.com/2016/03/25/business/media/music-sales-remain-steady-but-lucrative-cd-sales-decline.html).Google Scholar

Sluiter, Saba: The Dutch Courts Apply UsedSoft to the Resale of eBooks, Kluwer Copyright Blog, January 28, 2015 (http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2015/01/28/the-dutch-courts-apply-usedsoft-to-the-resale-of-ebooks/).Google Scholar

Smith, B. Chase: International or National Exhaustion: The Need for Legislative Intervention Regarding the First Sale Doctrine, Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 14/2014: pp. 578–598.Google Scholar

Smith, Judith Klerman: The Computer Software Rental Act: Amending the “First Sale Doctrine” to Protect Computer Software Copyright, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 20/1987: pp. 1613–1639.Google Scholar

Soma, John T., and Kugler, Michael K.: Why Rent When You Can Own? How ReDigi, Apple, and Amazon Will Use the Cloud and the Digital First Sale Doctrine to Resell Music, E-Books, Games, and Movies, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, March 2014, pp. 425–461.Google Scholar

Sosnitza, Olaf: Gemeinschaftsrechtliche Vorgaben und urheberrechtlicher Gestaltungsspielraum für den Handel mit gebrauchter Software, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 7/2009, pp. 521–526.Google Scholar

Spedicato, Giorgio: Online Exhaustion and the Boundaries of Interpretation. In: Caso, Roberto and Giovanella, Federica (Eds.): Balancing Copyright Law in the Digital Age – Comparative Perspectives, Springer, Berlin, 2015: pp. 27–64.Google Scholar

Spoor, J. H., Verkade, D. W. F., and Visser, D. J. G.: Auteursrecht, Kluwer, Deventer, 2005.Google Scholar

Stazi, Andrea: Digital Copyright and Consumer/User Protection: Moving toward a New Framework?, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 2/2012: pp. 158–174.Google Scholar

Steimer, Maureen: Restoring the Balance: Bringing Back Consumers Rights in UMG Recordings v. Augusto by Reaffirming the First Sale Doctrine in Copyright Law, Villanova Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 16/2009: pp. 313–342.Google Scholar

Sterling, J. A. L.: World Copyright Law, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1998.Google Scholar

Stern, Richard H.: Some Reflections on Parallel Importation of Copyrighted Products into the United States and the Relation of the Exhaustion Doctrine to the Doctrine of Implied Licence, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 4/1989, pp. 119–127.Google Scholar

Stern, Richard H.: USA: Copyright – Transnational Exhaustion of Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/2009, pp. N31–32.Google Scholar

Stokes, Simon: Copyright and Artistic Practice: Allposters Revisited, Entertainment Law Review, Issue 5/2016, pp. 172–174.Google Scholar

Stothers, Christopher: When Is Copyright Exhausted by a Software Licence? UsedSoft v. Oracle, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 11/2012, pp. 787–791.Google Scholar

Streitfeld, David: Amazon Offers All-You-Can-Eat Books; Authors Turn Up Noses, New York Times, December 27, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/12/28/technology/amazon-offers-all-you-can-eat-books-authors-turn-up-noses.html).Google Scholar

Strowel, Alain (Ed.): Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009.Google Scholar

Tai, Eric Tjong Tjin: Exhaustion and Online Delivery of Digital Works, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 5/2003, pp. 207–211.Google Scholar

Targosz, Tomasz: Exhaustion in Digital Products and the “Accidental” Impact on the Balance of Interests in Copyright Law. In: Bently, Lionel, Suthersanen, Uma, and Torremans, Paul (Eds.): Global Copyright – Three Hundred Years since the Statute of Anne, from 1709 to Cyberspace, Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham, 2010: pp. 337–353.Google Scholar

Tobin, Jonathan C.: Licensing as a Means of Providing Affordability and Accessability in Digital Markets: Alternatives to a Digital First Sale Doctrine, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, Vol. 93/2011: pp. 167–187.Google Scholar

Trampuž, Miha: An Oracle on European Copyright Exhaustion, Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur, July 2016: pp. 155–255.Google Scholar

Travers, Noel: Rental Rights and the Specific Subject-Matter of Copyright in Community Law, European Law Review, Issue 2/1999, pp. 171–177.Google Scholar

Tritton, Guy: Intellectual Property in Europe, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2002.Google Scholar

Tseng, David: Bypassed: The Kirtsaeng Decision's Underwhelming Impact on Exhaustion, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 43/2015: pp. 559–593.Google Scholar

Tucker, Annette V.: The Validity of the Manufacturing Clause of the United States Copyright Code as Challenged by Trade Partners and Copyright Owners, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Summer 1985, pp. 577–624.Google Scholar

Turner, Stephanie B.: The Artist's Resale Royalty Right: Overcoming the Information Problem, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Issue 2/2012, pp. 329–370.Google Scholar

Turner, Stephanie B.: The Artist's Resale Royalty Right: Overcoming the Information Problem, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 19/2014, pp. 329–370.Google Scholar

Ubertazzi, Luigi Carlo: Copyright and the Free Movement of Goods, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 1/1985, pp. 46–75.Google Scholar

Ulmer, Eugen: Die Entscheidungen zur Kabelübertragung von Rundfunksendungen im Lichte urheberrechtlicher Grundsätze, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 6/1981, pp. 372–378.Google Scholar

Ulmer, Eugen: The “Droit de Suite” in International Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 1/1975, pp. 12–28.Google Scholar

UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development: Resource Book on TRIPS and Development, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.Google Scholar

Vacca, Ryan: Expanding Preferential Treatment under the Record Rental Amendment beyond the Music Industry, Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 11/2007: pp. 605–632.Google Scholar

Vale, Shannon T., and Brennan, Daniel J.: Recent Developments in Copyright Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 4/1996: pp. 321–334.Google Scholar

Vanden Heuvel, Sage: Fighting the First Sale Doctrine: Strategies for a Struggling Film Industry, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 18/2012: pp. 661–689.Google Scholar

Van Calster, Geert: Case Law: Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited [1998]ECR 1–1251, The Columbia Journal of European Law, Issue 1/2000, pp. 115–123.Google Scholar

Van Oostveen, Dirk: Netherlands: Copyright, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 3/1997, pp. D74–75.Google Scholar

Verbraeken, Erik: The Exhaustion Theory Is Not Yet Exhausted, les Nouvelles, March 2013, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar

Verkade, Feer: “First-Sale” or Exhaustion Doctrine in the Netherlands. In: Hugenholtz, P. Bernt, Quaedvlieg, Antoon, and Visser, Dirk (Eds.): A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912–2012, deLex, Amsterdam, 2012: pp. 291–305.Google Scholar

Verma, S. K.: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Free Trade – Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1998, pp. 534–567.Google Scholar

Vezzoso, Simonetta: Copyright, Interfaces, and a Possible Atlantic Divide, JIPITEC, Issue 2/2012, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar

Vinje, Thomas, Marsland, Vanessa, and Gärtner, Anette: Software Licensing after Oracle v. UsedSoft – Implications of Oracle v. UsedSoft (C-128/11) for European Copyright Law, Computer Law Review International, Issue 4/2012, pp. 97–102.Google Scholar

von Lewinski, Silke: International Copyright Law and Policy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2008.Google Scholar

von Lewinski, Silke: International Exhaustion of the Distribution Right under EC Copyright Law?, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 7/2005, pp. 233–236.Google Scholar

von Lewinski, Silke: Proposed EC Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society as It Progresses, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 7/2014, pp. 767–782.Google Scholar

von Ungern-Sternberg, Joachim: Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts und Vermietung von Videokassetten, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 4/1984, pp. 262–267.Google Scholar

Walter, Michel M.: Zum Vermieten von Werken der angewandten Kunst, Medien und Recht, Issue 5/2008, pp. 246–248.Google Scholar

Walter, Michel M., and von Lewinski, Silke: European Copyright Law – A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.Google Scholar

Wandtke, Artur-Axel, and von Gerlach, Felix-Tessen: Die urheberrechtliche Rechtmäßigkeit der Nutzung von Audio-Video Streaminginhalten im Internet, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 7/2013, pp. 676–683.Google Scholar

Weicher, Michael B.: K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.: A Black Decision for the Gray Market, American University Law Review, Vol. 38/1989: pp. 463–489.Google Scholar

Wenzel, Karl Egbert, and Burkhardt, Emanuel H.: Urheberrecht für die Praxis, Vol. 5, Vollständig überarbeitete Auflage, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, Köln, 2009.Google Scholar

Westkamp, Guido: Exhaustion and the Internet as a Distribution Channel: The Relationship between Intellectual Property and European Law in Search of Clarification. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 498–517.Google Scholar

Wiebe, Andreas: Europäischer Datenbankschutz nach “William Hill” – Kehrtwende zur Informationsfreiheit?, Computer und Recht, Issue 3/2005, pp. 169–174.Google Scholar

Wiebe, Andreas: The Principle of Exhaustion in European Copyright Law and the Distinction between Digital Goods and Digital Services, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 2/2009, pp. 114–118.Google Scholar

Winghardt, Stefan: Gemeinschaftsrechtliches Diskriminierungsverbot und Inländerbehandlungsgrundsatz unter dem Blickwinkel der kollektiven Wahrnehmung urheberrechtlicher Ansprüche, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Issue 12/2001, pp. 993–1011.Google Scholar

WIPO Magazine: 50 Years of the Video Cassette Recorder, November 2006: pp. 8–11.Google Scholar

Witzel, Michaela: Remarks to EU: Exhaustion of Distribution Right for Software Copy, Computer Law Review International, Issue 4/2012, pp. 121–123.Google Scholar

Woods, Tanya: Copyright Enforcement at All Costs? Finding a Place for Balance in the International Enforcement Agenda, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Summer 2009: pp. 347–393.Google Scholar

Wright, Aaron, and De Filippi, Primavera: Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia, March 10, 2015 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=2580664).Google Scholar

Yen, Alfred C., and Liu, Joseph P.: Copyright Law – Essential Cases and Materials, 2nd ed., American Casebook Series, West, St. Paul, 2011.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: The Alphabet Soup of Transborder Intellectual Property Enforcement. In: Weckström, Katja (Ed.): Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, Private Law Series A:132, University of Turku Faculty of Law, Turku, 2013: pp. 239–257.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: Anticircumvention and Anti-Anticircumvention, Denver University Law Review, Issue 1/2006, pp. 13–77.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: The Copy in Copyright. In: Lai, Jessica C. and Dominicé, Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016: pp. 65–93.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: The Global Intellectual Property Order and Its Undetermined Future, The WIPO Journal, Vol. 1/2009: pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: How Copyright Law May Affect Pop Music without Our Knowing It, UMKC Law Review, Vol. 38/2014a: pp. 363–401.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: Region Codes and the Territorial Mess, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 20/2012: pp. 187–264.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: TPP and Trans-Pacific Perplexities, Fordham International Law Journal, May 2014b, pp. 1129–1181.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter K.: What Apple's New Music Streaming Service Will Mean for Underpaid Songwriters, The Conversation, June 17, 2015 (http://theconversation.com/what-apples-new-music-streaming-service-will-mean-for-underpaid-songwriters-42230).Google Scholar

Zech, Herbert: Vom Buch zur Cloud – Die Verkehrsfähigkeit digitaler Güter, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 3/2013: pp. 369–396.Google Scholar

Zweigert, Konrad, and Kötz, Hein: Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, Vol. 3, Auflage, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, 1996.Google Scholar

COM(85) 310 = White Paper from the Commission to the European Council: Completing the Internal Market, COM(85) 310 final, Brussels, June 14, 1985.Google Scholar

COM(96) 568 = Follow-up to the Green Paper on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, 1996, COM (96) 568 final, Brussels, November 20, 1996.Google Scholar

COM(2000) 199 = Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on the implementation and effects of Directive 91/250/EEC on the legal protection of computer programs, COM(2000) 199 final, Brussels, April 10, 2000.Google Scholar

COM(2011) 635 = Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law, COM(2011) 635 final, Brussels, November 10, 2011.Google Scholar

COM(2015) 626 = Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Towards a modern, more European copyright framework, COM(2015) 626 final, Brussels, December 9, 2015.Google Scholar

DMCA Section 104 Report (2001) = DMCA Section 104 Report – A Report of the Register of Copyrights Pursuant to §104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, August 2001 (www.copyright.gov/reports/studies/dmca/sec-104-report-vol-1.pdf).Google Scholar

Entwurf (2012) = Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Ermöglichung der privaten Weiterveräußerung unkörperlicher Werkexemplare, Drucksache 17/8377, January 18, 2012 (www.cr-online.de/20120207_1708377.pdf).Google Scholar

EU Position Paper (2015) = The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) – Towards an EU-US trade deal, Intellectual property, EU Position Paper, March 20, 2015 (http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/153331.htm).Google Scholar

Green Paper (1988) = Commission of the European Communities: Green Paper on Copyright and the Challenge of Technology – Copyright Issues Requiring Immediate Action, COM (88) 172 final, Brussels, June 7, 1988.Google Scholar

Green Paper (1995) = Green Paper – Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, Brussels, COM(95) 382 final, Brussels, June 19, 1995.Google Scholar

H.R. Rep (1909) = The House Report 1 on the Copyright Act of 1909, February 1909 (http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/lipa/copyrights/The%20House%20Report%201%20on%20the%20Copyright%20Act%20of%201909.pdf).Google Scholar

H.R. Rep. (1976) = H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476 (1976).Google Scholar

H.R. Rep. (1984) = H.R. Rep. No. 98–987 (1984).Google Scholar

Public Consultation (2014) = Public Consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules, 2014 (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/copyright-rules/docs/consultation-document_en.pdf).Google Scholar

Report to Congress (2001) = Report to Congress: Study Examining 17 U.S.C. Sections 109 and 117 Pursuant to Section 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, March 21, 2001 (www.ntia.doc.gov/report/2001/report-congress-study-examining-17-usc-sections-109-and-117-pursuant-section-104-digital).Google Scholar

SEC(2012) 680 = Orientation Debate on Content in the Digital Economy, SEC(2012) 680, Brussels, November 28, 2012.Google Scholar

S.Rep. (1983) = S. Rep. No. 98–162 (1983).Google Scholar

Pallante Statement (2015) = Statement of Maria A. Pallante, United States Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office, Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, “The Register's Perspective on Copyright Review,” April 29, 2015 (http://judiciary.house.gov/_cache/files/1c82a3a6–3b1b-4a51-b212–281454d1e56e/written-testimony-of-register-maria-a-pallante.pdf).Google Scholar

USCO (1992) = U.S. Copyright Office: Droit de Suite: The Artist's Resale Royalty, December 1992 (www.copyright.gov/history/droit_de_suite.pdf).Google Scholar

USCO (2013) = U.S. Copyright Office: Resale Royalties: an Updated Analysis, December 2013 (www.copyright.gov/docs/resaleroyalty/usco-resaleroyalty.pdf).Google Scholar

USCO (2016) = U.S. Copyright Office: The Making Available Right in the United States, February 2016 (www.copyright.gov/docs/making_available/making-available-right.pdf).Google Scholar

U.S. Green Paper (1994) = Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: A Preliminary Draft of the Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, July 1994.Google Scholar

U.S. White Paper (1995) = Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, September 1995.Google Scholar

U.S. White Paper (2016) = The Department of Commerce – Internet Policy Task Force: White Paper on Remixes, First Sale and Statutory Damages – Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy, January 2016 (www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/copyrightwhitepaper.pdf).Google Scholar

A&M Records, Inc., et al., v. Napster, Inc., et al., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001).Google Scholar

Aftermath Records, et al. v. F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al., 131 S.Ct. 1677 (2011).Google Scholar

American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., et al. v. Aereo, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 2498 (2014).Google Scholar

Andrew Paul Leonard v. Stemtech Health Sciences, Inc., et al., 2013 WL 5288266.Google Scholar

Apple Computer, Inc. vs. Microsoft Corporation, 35 F.3d 1435 (1994).Google Scholar

Art & Allposters International BV kontra Stichting Pictoright, Case C-419/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:27.Google Scholar

Atlantic Recording Corporation, et al., Pamela, v. and Howell, Jeffrey, 554 F.Supp.2d 976 (2008).Google Scholar

BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015]EWHC 1723 (Admin).Google Scholar

BestWater International GmbH kontra Michael Mebes és Stefan Potsch, Case C-348/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2315.Google Scholar

Bezpečnostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany kontra Ministerstvo kultury, Case C-393/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:816.Google Scholar

BGH 21.11.1958 (I ZR 98/57) – Der Heiligenhof, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 4/1959, pp. 200–204.Google Scholar

BGH 07.11.1980 (I ZR 24/79) – Kabelfernsehen in Abschattungsgebieten, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 4/1981, pp. 413–419.Google Scholar

BGH 06.05.1981 (I ZR 92/78) – Schallplattenexport, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 2/1982, pp. 100–102.Google Scholar

BGH 21.03.1985 (I ZR 166/82) – Schallplattenimport II, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 10/1985, pp. 924–926.Google Scholar

BGH 15.05.1986 (I ZR 22/84) – Videofilmvorführung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 10/1986, pp. 742–743.Google Scholar

BGH 22.12.1999 (VIII ZR 299/98) – Ablieferung von Standard-Software, JurPC Web-Dok. 70/2000, Abs. 1–26. (www.jurpc.de/jurpc/show?id=20000070).Google Scholar

BGH 7.6.2001 (I ZR 21/99) – Keine Erschöpfungswirkung bei Vertrieb im Wege des Kaufs auf Probe, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 10–11/2001, pp. 1036–1038.Google Scholar

BGH 15.11.2006 (XII ZR 120/04) – Zur Rechtsnatur der Softwareüberlassung im Rahmen eines ASP-Vertrages, Medien Internet und Recht, Issue 1/2007, p. 3. (http://medien-internet-und-recht.de/pdf/vt_MIR_Dok._009–2006.pdf).Google Scholar

BGH 11.02.2010 (I ZR 178/08) – Half-Life 2, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 9/2010, pp. 822–824.Google Scholar

BGH 17.07.2013 (I ZR 129/08) – Zulässigkeit des Vertriebs gebrauchter Softwarelizenzen – UsedSoft II., Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 3/2014, pp. 264–272. (Anm. Stieper).Google Scholar

BGH 11.12.2014 (I ZR 8/13) – Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts an Kopien eines Computerprogramms – UsedSoft III, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 8/2015, pp. 772–780. (Anm. Sattler).Google Scholar

BGH 19.3.2015 (I ZR 4/14) – Voraussetzungen zur Zulässigkeit der Weiterveräußerung gebrauchter Software – Green-IT, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 11/2015, pp. 1108–1114.Google Scholar

BGH 9.7.2015 (I ZR 46/12) – Keine öffentliche Wiedergabe durch “Framing” – Die Realität II, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 2/2016, pp. 171–176.Google Scholar

BMG Music, et al., v. Edmundo Perez, et al., 952 F.2d 318 (1991).Google Scholar

Bobbs-Merrill Company v. Isidor Straus and Nathan Straus, 210 U.S. 339 (1908).Google Scholar

Brilliance Audio, Inc. v. Haights Cross Communications, Inc., 474 F.3d 365 (2007).Google Scholar

Burke & Van Heusen Inc. v. Arrow Drug Inc., et al., 233 F.Supp. 881 (1964).Google Scholar

Capitol Records, LLC, v. ReDigi Inc., 934 F.Supp.2d 640 (2013).Google Scholar

Cartoon Network LP, LLLP, et al. v. CSC Holdings, Inc., et al., 536 F.3d 121 (2008).Google Scholar

Christie's France SNC kontra Syndicat national des antiquaires, Case C-41/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:119.Google Scholar

Cinéthèque SA és társai kontra Fédération nationale des cinémas français, Joined Cases 60 and 61/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:329.Google Scholar

Clemens v. Estes, 22 Fed. Rep. 899 (1885).Google Scholar

Coditel SA, Compagnie générale pour la diffusion de la télévision, és társai kontra Ciné-Vog Films SA és társai, Case 262/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:334.Google Scholar

Columbia Broadcasting System Inc. v. Scorpio Music Distributors Inc., 569 F.Supp. 47 (1983).Google Scholar

Columbia Broadcasting System Inc. v. Scorpio Music Distributors Inc., 738 F.2d 424 (1984).Google Scholar

Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Aveco, Inc., et al., 800 F.2d 59 (1986).Google Scholar

Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Redd Horne, Inc., et al., 749 F.2d 154 (1984).Google Scholar

Computer Associates International, Inc., v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693 (1992).Google Scholar

Cosmair Inc., et al. v. Dynamite Enterprises Inc., et al., 226 U.S.P.Q. 344 (1985).Google Scholar

Costco Wholesale Corp., v. Omega S.A.,559 U.S. 1066 (2010).Google Scholar

Costco Wholesale Corp., v. Omega S.A., 131 S.Ct. 565 (2010).Google Scholar

Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v. Tom Kabinet, 200 154 572/01 SKG NL:GHAMS:2015:66, January 20, 2015, Computer Law Review International, Issue 2/2015, pp. 47–50.Google Scholar

Criminal proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner, Case C-5/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:370.Google Scholar

Denbicare U.S.A., Inc., et al., v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., 84 F.3d 1143 (1996).Google Scholar

Denbicare U.S.A., Inc. v. Toys “R” Us, Inc. 519 U.S. 873 (1996).Google Scholar

Design Options, Inc., v. Bellepointe, Inc., 940 F.Supp 86 (1996).Google Scholar

Deutsche Grammophon Gesellschaft mbH kontra Metro-SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG, Case 78/70, ECLI:EU:C:1971:59.Google Scholar

Deutsche Grammophon Geselschaft mbH v. Metro-SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG (3 U 108/1970), Hanseatische OLG, October 28, 1971.Google Scholar

District Court of Amsterdam, Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet, C/13/567567/KG ZA 14–795 SP/MV, July 21, 2014.Google Scholar

District Court Mid-Nederlands, CWS v. Vendorlink, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2015:1096, 25.03.2015, Computer Law Review International, Issue 2/2016, pp. 60–62.Google Scholar

Dowling v. United States, 472 U.S. 207 (1985).Google Scholar

Dutch Supreme Court, Beeldbrigade, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BV1301, 27.04.2012, Computerrecht, Issue 2/2012, pp. 339–353.Google Scholar

Edmundo Perez v. BMG Music, et al., 505 U.S. 1206 (1992).Google Scholar

Elisa Allison, et al., v. Vintage Sports Plaques, et al., 136 F.3d 1443 (1998).Google Scholar

EMI Electrola GmbH kontra Patricia Im- und Export és társai, Case 341/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:30.Google Scholar

Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 34, [2012]2 R.C.S. 231.Google Scholar

Estate of Robert Graham, et al., v. Sotheby's, Inc., 860 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2012).Google Scholar

Estate of Robert Graham, et al., v. Sotheby's, Inc., 178 F.Supp.3d 974 (2016).Google Scholar

Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. és Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH kontra az Európai Gazdasági Közösség Bizottsága, Joined Cases 56/64 and 58/64, ECLI:EU:C:1966:41.Google Scholar

Euro-Excellence Inc. v. Kraft Canada Inc., [2007]3 S.C.R. 20, 2007 SCC 37.Google Scholar

European Commission v France, Case C-479/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:141.Google Scholar

F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al. v. Aftermath Records, et al., No. CV 07–3314 PSG (MANx), 2009 WL 137021.Google Scholar

F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al. v. Aftermath Records, et al., 621 F.3d 958 (2010).Google Scholar

Flava Works, Inc., v. Marques Rondale Gunter, et al., 689 F.3d 754 (2012).Google Scholar

Football Association Premier League Ltd és társai kontra QC Leisure és társai, Joined Cases C-403/08. és C-429/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:631.Google Scholar

Fundación Gala-Salvador Dalí és Visual Entidad de Gestión de Artistas Plásticos (VEGAP) kontra Société des auteurs dans les arts graphiques et plastiques (ADAGP) és társai, Case C-518/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:191.Google Scholar

Ganghua Liu v. Pearson Education, Inc., et al., 133 S.Ct. 1630 (2013).Google Scholar

G. Basset kontra Société des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs de musique (SACEM), Case 402/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:197.Google Scholar

Geophysical Service, Inc., v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company, 850 F.3d 785 (2017).Google Scholar

Google, Inc., v. Oracle America, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 2887.Google Scholar

Harrison v. Maynard, Merrill & Co., 61 Fed. Rep. 689 (1894).Google Scholar

Hearst Corporation, et al., v. J. Ben Stark, et al., 639 F.Supp. 970 (1986).Google Scholar

Henry Bill Publishing Co. v. Smythe, 27 Fed. Rep. 914 (1886).Google Scholar

Independent News Co., Inc., et al., v. Harry Williams, 293 F.2d 510 (1951).Google Scholar

Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening, Case C-5/08, ECLI:EU:C:2009:465.Google Scholar

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and Others v TV Catch Up Ltd., Case C-607/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:147.Google Scholar

Johan Deckmyn and Others v Helena Vandersteen and Others, Case C-201/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2132.Google Scholar

John Hampton, et al. v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, et al., 279 F.2d 100 (1960) cert. denied 364 U.S. 882 (1960).Google Scholar

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, et al., 2009 WL 3364037 (S.D.N.Y., 2009).Google Scholar

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210 (2011).Google Scholar

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, 713 F.3d 1142 (2013).Google Scholar

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, 2013 WL 6722887 (S.D.N.Y., 2013).Google Scholar

KG 26.1.2001 (5 U 4102/99) – Erschöpfung des Urheberrechts an Dias – Gruß aus Potsdam, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Rechtssprechungs-Report, Issue 4/2002, pp. 125–126.Google Scholar

K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 108 S.Ct. 1811 (1988).Google Scholar

Lantern Press Inc. v. American Publishers Co., 419 F.Supp. 1267 (1976).Google Scholar

L'anza Research International v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., 1995 WL 908331 (C.D. Cal.).Google Scholar

L'anza Research International v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., 98 F.3d 1109 (1996).Google Scholar

Laserdisken ApS kontra Kulturministeriet, Case C-479/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:549.Google Scholar

LG Bielefeld 05.03.2013 (4 O 191/11) – Einschränkung der Rechte beim Erwerb urheberrechtlich geschützter Werke über das Internet, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 8/2013, pp. 688–694.Google Scholar

LG München I. 19.01.2006 (7 O 23237/05) – Online-Erwerb von Software/Erschöpfungsgrundsatz Urheberrecht (Deutschland), Medien und Recht International, Issue 4/2006, pp. 201–204.Google Scholar

LG München I. 15.03.2007 (7 O 7061/06) – Handel mit “gebrauchten” Softwarelizenzen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 5/2007, pp. 409–417.Google Scholar

London-Sire Records, Inc. v. John Doe 1,542 F.Supp.2d 153 (2008).Google Scholar

Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996).Google Scholar

MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511 (1993).Google Scholar

Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA and Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA, Case C-98/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:55.Google Scholar

Mazer, et al. v. Stein, et al., 347 U.S. 201 (1954).Google Scholar

Microsoft Corp. v. Software Wholesale Club, Inc., 129 F.Supp.2d 995 (2000).Google Scholar

Mirage Editions, Inc., et al., v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co., 856 F.2d 1341 (1988).Google Scholar

Morseburg v. Balyon, 621 F.3d 972 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 983 (1980).Google Scholar

Motown Record Co., LP, et al., v. Theresa DePietro, 2007 WL 576284 (E.D.Pa.).Google Scholar

Musik-Vertrieb membran GmbH and K-tel International v GEMA – Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte, Joined Cases 55 and 57/80, ECLI:EU:C:1981:10.Google Scholar

Navitaire Inc. v. easyJet Airline Company and Others, [2004]EWHC 1725 (Ch).Google Scholar

Neutrogena Corporation v. U.S., Secretary of the Treasury, 7 U.S.P.Q.2d 1900 (1988).Google Scholar

Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB, Case C-466/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:76.Google Scholar

Nintendo of America, Inc., v. Elcon Industries, Inc., et al., 564 F.Supp. 937 (1992).Google Scholar

Nintendo Co. Ltd and Others v PC Box and Others, Case C-355/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:25.Google Scholar

OGH 23.05.2000 4 Ob 30/00s, Medien und Recht, Issue 4/2000, pp. 249–253. (Anm. Walter).Google Scholar

OLG Düsseldorf 29.06.2009 (20 U 247/08) – Zweck des Erschöpfungsgrundsatzes, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Rechtssprechungs-Report, Issue 1/2009, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar

OLG Frankfurt am Main 12.05.2009 (11 W 15/09) – Handel mit Software-Echtheitszertifikaten und Product-Keys, Medien Internet und Recht, Issue 6/2009, pp. 1–4 (http://medien-internet-und-recht.de/pdf/VT_MIR_2009_131.pdf).Google Scholar

OLG Frankfurt am Main 18.12.2012 (11 U 68/11) – Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts on online übermittelter Software – Adobe/UsedSoft, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 3/2013, pp. 279–285.Google Scholar

OLG Frankfurt am Main 22.12.2016 (11 U 108/13) – Keine Erschöpfung durch Herunterladen einer Testversion, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 6/2017, pp. 512–517.Google Scholar

OLG Hamburg 04.12.2014 (10 U 5/11) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Online-Diensten – eBook-AGB, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht – Rechtssprechungs-Report, Issue 9/2015, pp. 361–365.Google Scholar

OLG Hamm 15.05.2014 (22 U 60/13) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Audiodateien – Hörbuch-AGB, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 9/2014, pp. 853–863.Google Scholar

OLG München 03.07.2008 (6 U 2759/07) – Handel mit “gebrauchten” Softwarelizenzen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Issue 1/2009, pp. 70–74 (Anm. Herzog).Google Scholar

OLG Stuttgart 03.11.2011 (2 U 49/11) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Online-Vertrieb von Hörbüchern, Computer und Recht, Issue 5/2012, pp. 301–302 (Anm. Schmidt).Google Scholar

Omega S.A., et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 2007 WL 7029734 (C.D.Cal., 2007).Google Scholar

Omega S.A., et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (2008).Google Scholar

Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 2011 WL 8492716 (C.D.Cal., 2011).Google Scholar

Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 776 F.3d 692 (2015).Google Scholar

Opinion, Axel W. Bierbach, administrator of UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp., Case C-128/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:234.Google Scholar

Opinion, Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others, Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:43.Google Scholar

Opinion, Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, Case C-174/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:459.Google Scholar

Oracle America Inc. v. Google Inc., 750 F.3d 1339 (2014).Google Scholar

Paramount Home Entertainment v. British Sky Broadcasting [2014]EWHC 937 (Ch).Google Scholar

Parfums Christian Dior SA és Parfums Christian Dior BV kontra Evora BV, Case C-337/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:517.Google Scholar

Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. Drug Emporium, Inc., 38 F.3d 477 (1994).Google Scholar

Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. Drug Emporium, Inc., 514 U.S. 1004 (1995).Google Scholar

Paul Edmond Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985).Google Scholar

Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Ganghua Liu, et al., 656 F.Supp.2d 407 (2009).Google Scholar

Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Ganghua Liu, et al., 10–894-mv (Second Circuit, 2011; nem publikált).Google Scholar

Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Mohit Arora, et al., 717 F.Supp.2d 374 (2010).Google Scholar

Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Mohit Arora, et al., 438 Fed.Appx. 34 (2011).Google Scholar

Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Vinod Kumar, et al., 721 F.Supp.2d 166 (2010).Google Scholar

Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Vinod Kumar, et al., 452 Fed.Appx. 11 (2011).Google Scholar