References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 July 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constraints and CreativityIn Search of Creativity Science, pp. 312 - 358Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, A. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H. (1953). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Acocella, J. (2020). Bigger things to hide behind: Andy Warhol and the reign of pop. The New Yorker, June 8 & 15, 62–68.Google Scholar
Adams, L. S. (1996). The methodologies of art. An introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Adelman, J. (2013). Wordly philosopher. The odyssey of Albert O. Hirschman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (1997). Aesthetic theory (Adorno, G. & Tiedemann, R. ed.). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. (1999). Rough magic. A biography of Sylvia Plath. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Alperson, P. (2003). Creativity in art. In Levinson, J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 225–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (5), 997–1013.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative. Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, September‒October, 77–87.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopolous, G. (Ed.). (2009). A Companion to Aristotle. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. & Faye, J. (Eds.). (2006). Arven efter Kuhn. Frederiksberg: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Andersson, Å. E. & Sahlin, N.-E. (1997). The complexity of creativity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Andersson, D. E., Andersson, Å. E. & Melander, C. (Eds.). (2011) Handbook of creative cities. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Andréasson, P.- G. (Ed.). (2006). Geobiosfären – en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Arana, M. (2003). The writing life. Writers on how they think and work. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1984a). Poetics. In Barnes, J. (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2) (pp. 2316–2340). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. (1984b). Rhetoric. In Barnes, J. (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2) (pp. 2152–2269). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1957). Film as art (ch. 1). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1962). The genesis of a painting: Picasso’s Guernica. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1966). Toward a psychology of art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Aron, R. (1967/1980). Main currents in sociological thought (Vols. 1 & 2). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Azevedo, W. d’ (1973/1997). Sources of Gola Artistru. In Feagin, S. & Maynard, P. (Eds.), Aesthetics (pp. 197–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986a). The dialogical imagination (Holquist, M. ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986b) Speech genres and other late essays (Emerson, C. & Holquist, M. ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, B. (2003). Thomas Kuhn and the problem of social order in science. In Nickles, T. (Ed.), Thomas Kuhn (pp. 122‒144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, B., Bloor, D. & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge. A sociological analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barr, A. H. Jr. (1943/1974). What is a modern painting (1st ed.). New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Barr, A. H. Jr. (1946). Picasso. Fifty years of his art. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Barr, A. H. Jr. (1953/1976). Matisse. His art and his public. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition towards originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 476–485.Google Scholar
Barron, F. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. (1956/2000). Myth today. In Sontag, S. (Ed.), A Roland Barthes Reader (pp. 93–149). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1960/2000). Authors and writers. In Sontag, S. (Ed.), A Roland Barthes Reader (pp. 185–193, v. 251–295). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1964/1977). Rhetoric of the image. In Music, image, text. (pp. 52–91). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1966/2000). Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives. In Sontag, S. (Ed.), A Roland Barthes reader (pp. 251–295). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1968/1977). The death of the author. In Music, image, text (pp. 142–198). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Barthes, R.(1971/1977). Writers, intellectuals, teachers. In Image, music, text (pp. 190‒215). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (2000). In Sontag, S. (Ed.), A Roland Barthes reader (S. Sontag Intoduction). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. H. (1990). Barriers against interdisciplinarity: Implications for studies of science, technology and society (STS). Science, Technology & Human Values, 15(1), 105–119.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M. (1972). Painting and experience in fifteenth century Italy. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M. (1985). Patterns of intention. On the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, M. C. (1958). Aesthetics. problems in the philosophy of criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Beardsley, M. C. (1966/1967). Aesthetics. From classical Greece to the present. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1951). Role and career problems of the Chicago public school teacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1966). Outsiders. Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1962). Max Weber ‒ An intellectual portrait. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (2008). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Cahn, S. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comprehensive anthology (pp. 327‒343). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benson, P. S., Lambek, B. & Ørskov, S. (2004). Mærsk manden og magten. Copenhagen: Politiken Bøger.Google Scholar
Berger, P., Berger, B. & Kellner, H. (1973). The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Anchor.Google Scholar
Berglund, K. (2007). Jag tänker på Linné. Han som såg allt. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers.Google Scholar
Bertaux, D. & Delcroiz, C. (2000). Case histories of families and social processes enriching sockologi. In Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J. & Wengraf, T. (Eds.),The turn to biographical Methods in social science (pp. 71–89). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biagioli, M. (2001). Replication or monopoly? The economies of invention and discovery in Galileo’s Observations of 1610. In Renn, J. (Ed.), Galileo in Context (pp. 277–322). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bierstedt, R. (1981). American Sociological Theory. A Critical History. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (Ed.). (1994). Dimensions of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, E. (2009). Contribution to ambassadors meeting: Manifesto for creativity and innovation. Brussels, March 25.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1961/1983). The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bordwell, D. (1997). On the history of film style. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bordwell, D. & Carroll, N. (Eds.). (1996). Post-theory. Reconstructing film studies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bordwell, D, Staiger, J. & Thompson, K. (1988). The classical Hollywood cinema. Film style & mode of production to 1960. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bottomore, T. & Nisbet, R. (Eds.). (1978) A history of sociological analysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boundas, C. V. & Olkowski, D. (1994). Gilles Deleuze and the theatre of philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1974a). The specifity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1974b). Zur Soziologie der symbolischen Formen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1995). The rules of art. Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Die biographische Illusion. In Hoerning, E. M. (Ed.), Biographische Sozialisation (pp. 51–60). Stuttgart: Lucius & LuciusGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity, Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. (1990). Vladimir Nabokov. The Russian years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. (1991). Vladimir Nabokov. The American years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brante, T. (1984). Vetenskapens sociala grunder – en studie av konflikter i forskarvärlden. Stockholm: Prisma.Google Scholar
Bredsdorff, T. (1987). Den bratte forvandling. Om digteren Sylvia Plath med digtene ved Uffe Haarder. Copenhagen: Gad.Google Scholar
Brettell, R. R. (2001). Impressionism. Painting quickly in France, 1860–1890. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Brinnin, J. M. (1959/1987). The third rose. Gertrude Stein and her world. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. R. & Pollard, A. M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of archeological sciences. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Browne, J. & Neve, M. (1989). Introduction. In Darwin, C. (1839/1989). Voyage on the Beagle (pp. 1–28). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bruccoli, M. J. (1991). The only thing that counts. The Ernest Hemingway- Maxwell Perkins correspondence. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Bruford, W. H. (1962). Culture and society in classical Weimar. 1775–1806. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1960/1977). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2004). Kulturens väv. Utbildning i kulturpsykologisk belysning. Gothenburg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2006a). In search of pedagogy. Volume I. The selected works of Jerome S. Bruner. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (2006b). In search of pedagogy. Volume II. The selected works of Jerome S. Bruner. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brummer, H. H. (2000). Till ögats fröjd och nationens förgyllning ‒ Ander Zorn. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1759/2014). A philosophical enquiry into the origins of our ideas of the sublime and the beautiful. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, F. (Ed.). (2008). Charles Darwin. The Beagle letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butscher, E. (1976/2003). Sylvia Plath. Method and madness. Tucson, AZ: Schaffner Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, S. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.). (2008). Aesthetics. A comprehensive antholoogy. Malden: MA. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardwell, D. S. L. (1972). Turning points in western technology. New York: Neale Watson.Google Scholar
Carrol, N. (1992/2008). Art, intention and conversation. In Cahn, S. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comparative anthology (pp. 568–588). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (1996). Theorizing the moving image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (Ed). (2000). Theories of art today. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (2002). Why horror? In Neill, A. & Ridley, A. (Eds.), Arguing about art. Contemporary philosophical debates (2nd ed.). (pp. 275–294). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Carroll, N. (2005). Aesthetic experience. A question of contents. In Kieran, M. (Ed.), Aesthetics and the philosophy of art (pp. 69–97). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2002). The roots of scientific reasoning: infancy, modularity and the art of tracking. In Carruthers, P., Stich, S. & Siegal, M. (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries. Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cela-Conde, C. J. & Ayala, F. J. (2007). Human evolution. Trails from the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A. H. (1999). What is this thing called science? Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Chancellor, G. & van Wyhe, J. (Eds.). (2009). Charles Darwin’s notebooks from the voyage of the Beagle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cinqualabre, O. & Migayrou, F. (Eds.). (2015). Le Corbusier. The measures of man. Zurich: Scheidegger & Spiess.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. F. (1994). The scientific revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1998).The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. (2000a). The sociology of philosophies. A présis. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 30(2): 157–201.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (2000b). Reply to reviewers and symposium commentators. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 30(2), 299–325.Google Scholar
Condit, C. W. (1964). The Chicago school of architecture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. (1967). Continuities in the study of social conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. (1971). Masters of sociological thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. (1984). Refugee scholars in America. Their impact and their experiences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A, Kadushin, C. & Powell, W. W. (1982). Books. The culture and commerce of publishing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1(2), 113‒127.Google Scholar
Craft, A. (2007). Possibility thinking in the early years and primary classroom education. In Tan, A.-G., (Ed.), Creativity. A handbook for teachers (pp. 231–249). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. (1988). What mad pursuit. A personal view of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Crowther, P. (1993/1996). Critical aesthetics and postmodernism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curran, J. (2016). Agatha Christie’s complete secret notebooks. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Csiksmenthalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence.Volume 1 (pp. 298‒306). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daiches, D., Jones, J. & Jones, P. (Eds.). (1986). A hotbed of genius. The Scottish enlightenment 1730–1790. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dale, M. (1997). The movie game. The film business in Britain. Europe and America. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Danielsson, B. (1965). Gauguins sydhavsår. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1964/2008). Art worlds. In Cahn, M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comprehensive anthology (pp. 416–425). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1997). After the end of art. Contemporary art and the pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (2000). Art and meaning. In Carroll, N. (Ed.), Theories of art today (pp. 130–140). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Dardis, T. (1989). The thirsty muse. Alcohol and the American writer. New York: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872/2009). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1892/1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin and selected letters (Darwin, F. ed.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1881). The formation of vegetable mould through the action of worms with observations of their habits. Gloucester: Dodo Press.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, L. (1975/1986). The war against the Jews 1933–1945. Toronto: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Davidson, E. (1996/1997). The trial of the Germans. Columbia, MO: The University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Davies, S. (2003) Ontology of art. In Levinson, J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 155– 180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976/2006). The selfish gene (30th anniversary ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2005). The ancestor’s tale. A pilgrimage to the dawn of life. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Dearborn, M. (2005/2006). Peggy Guggenheim. Mistress of modernism London: Voirago Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (2004). Att ha en bra idé i film. In Lundemo, T. (Eds.), Konst och film–texter efter 1970 (pp. 85, - 96). Lund: Raster.Google Scholar
Dennet, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the meaning of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1902/2000). Skolan og læreplanen. In Illeris, K. (Ed.), Tekster om læring (pp. 120–133). Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1993/2006). The third chimpanzee. The evolution and future of the human animal. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1999). Guns, germs and steel. The fates of human societies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (2005/2011). Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. & Robinson, J. A. (2010). Natural experiments of history. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Dick, B. F. (1997). City of dreams.The making and remaking of Universal Pictures. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (1964/2008). The myth of the aesthetic attitude. In Cahn, M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comprehensive anthology (pp. 455–465). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (1974/2008). What is art? An institutional analysis. In Cahn, M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comprehensive anthology (pp. 426–437). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (1997). Introduction to aesthetics. An analytical approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dickie, G. (2000). The institutional theory of art. In Carroll, N. (Ed.), Theories of art today (pp. 93–108). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. R. (1994/1997). Marketing management (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Dierig, S., Lachmund, J. & Mendelsohn, J. A. (2003). Science and the city. Osiris 18 (special volume).Google Scholar
Dissanyake, E. (1992/1995). Homo aestheticus. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Dollenmayter, D. (2007/2014). Susan Sontag. A biography. Evanston, IL. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1990). The origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. The evolution of human consciousness. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dudek, P. & Tenort, H.-E. (1994). Transformationen der deuschen Bildungslandshaft. Lernprozess mit ungewissen Ausgang. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1912/1964). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1982). The rules of the sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. & Mauss, M. (1903/1963). Primitive classification. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dysthe, O., Hertzberg, F. & Hoel, T. L. (2002). Skriva för att lära. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Eastlake, C. L. (2001). Methods and materials of painting of the great schools and masters. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1984). The role of the reader. Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. (2006). Photography – a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, L. (1969). The haunted screen: Expressionism and the German cinema. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Eldridge, R. (2014). An introduction to the philosophy of art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, J. (2001). Why art cannot be taught. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes. Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the mind. Rationality and the emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound. Studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engholm, I. & Michelsen, A. (1999/2000). Designmaskinen. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Engler, W. (1999). Die Ostdeutschen. Kunde von einem verlorenen Land. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag.Google Scholar
Eribon, D. (1991/1993). E. H. Gombrich. A life-long interest. Conversations on art and science. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Ericson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performanc. Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 329–338.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1970). Autobiographical notes on the identity crises, Daedalus, 99(4), 730–759.Google Scholar
Ette, O. (1998). Roland Barthes. Eine intellektuelle Biographie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1969).The semi-professions and their organizations: Teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension. Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ewers, S. & Nowotny, H. (1987). Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Die Elndeckung der Gestaltlbarkeit von Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Fagan, B. (2010). Cro-Magnon. How the Ice Age gave birth to the first modern humans. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Faulkner, R. R. & Anderson, A. B. (1987). Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 879–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausing, B. & Larsen, P. (Ed.). (1980).Visuel komunikation Volume 1 & 2. Copenhagen: Medusa.Google Scholar
Felt, U., Nowotny, H. & Taschwer, K. (1995). Wissenschaftsforschung. Eine Einführung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (2009). Empiricism and the first principles of Aristotelian science. In Anagnostopoulos, G. (Ed.), A companion to Aristotle (pp. 66–80). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fest, J. (1973/2014a). Hitler. En Biografi. Del I: Från ett liv udan mål till kampens tid. Stockholm: Fischer.Google Scholar
Fest, J. (1973/2014b). Hitler. En biografi. Del II. Från maktövertagndet till undergången. Scockholm: Discher.Google Scholar
Feuer, L. S. (1969). The conflict of generations: The character and significance of student movements. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1974). Review of Popper’s objective knowledge. In O’Hear, A. (Ed.), Karl Popper. Critical assessment of leading philosophers. Volume III: Philosophy of science 2 (pp. 533–537). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of science. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Firth, R. (Ed.). (1957/1970). Man and culture. An evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowski. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, M. C. (1996). Making modernism. Picasso and the creation of the art market for twentieth century art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, D. (1969). Émigré physicists and the biological revolution. In Fleming, D. & Bailyn, B. (Eds.), The intellectual migration (pp. 152–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fosnmark, A.-B. (2014). Van Gogh, Bernard, Gauguin. Dramaet i Arles. Copenhagen: Ordrupgaard.Google Scholar
Fonsmark, A.-B. & Brettell, R. (2005). Gauguin og Impressionismen. Maleri, skulptur og keramik. Copenhagen: Ordrupgaard museum.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1969/1994). What is an author? In Rabinow, P. (Eds.), Aesthetics, method, and methodology. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1982: Volume 2 (pp. 205–224). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1971/1972). The discourse on language. In The Archeology of Knowledge (pp. 215–237. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1971/1994). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and methodology. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1982. Volume 2 (pp. 369‒382). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, H. (1987). The continental drift debate. In Engelhardt, H. T. Jr. & Caplan, A. L. (Eds.), Scientific controversies. Case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology (pp. 243–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, H. (2009). Plate tectonics. In Bowler, P. J. & Pickstone, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science. Volume 6: The modern biological and earth sciences (pp. 385‒394). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frängsmyr, T. (Ed.). (1983). Linnaeus. The man and his work Frängsmyr. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
French, P. (1971). The movie moguls. An informal history of the Hollywood tycoons. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
French, M. (1994). Invention and evolution. Design in nature and engineering (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1938). The basic writings of Sigmund Freud (Brill, A. A. ed and Introduction. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. (Ed.). (2015). The Cambridge companion to Alfred Hitchcock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frisby, D. (1981). Sociological impressionism. A reassessment of Georg Simmel’s social theory. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S. (1993). A sociological theory of scientific change. Social Forces, 71(4), 933–953.Google Scholar
Furberg, M. (1969). Vision och skepsis. Från Thales till skeptikerna. Stockholm: Aldus/Bonniers.Google Scholar
Gabler, N. (1988). An empire of their own. How the Jews invented Hollywood. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. (2005). Creative thought as a non-Darwinian evolutionary process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(4), 262–283.Google Scholar
Gage, J. (1995/2005). Colour and culture. Practice and meaning from antiquity to abstraction. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. (2007). Origins and revolutions. Human identity in early prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. & Porr, M. (Eds.). (2005). The hominid individual in context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1987). The mind’s new sciennce. A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 298‒321). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Was Darwin’s Creativity Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 338–340.Google Scholar
Gardiner, P. (Ed.). (1974). The philosophy of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. A. (1986). Antisemitism in American history. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1984). The triumph of the Darwinian method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1971/1982).Capitalism and modern social theory. An analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (Ed.). (1972). Durkheim’s writings in sociology and social philosophy. Introduction to Émile Durkheim selected writings (pp. 1–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979b). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gill, J. (2006). The Cambridge companion to Sylvia Plath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, J. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to Sylvia Plath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine & Atherton.Google Scholar
Gleick, J. (1993). Genius. The life and science of Richard Feynman. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Goertzel, T. & Goertzel, B. (1995). Linus Pauling. A life in science and politics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). Hitler’s willing executioners. Ordinary Germans and the holocaust. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. (2008). Why Europe? The rise of the West in world history, 1500–1850. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Golinski, Jan (1998). Making natural knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Golinski, J. (2003). Chemistry. In Porter, R. (Ed.), The history of science. Volume 4: Eighteenth century science (pp. 375–396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1996). In Woodfield, R. (Ed.),The essential Gombrich. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1960/2000). Art and illusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. & Russell, C. (Eds.). (1991). The rise of scientific Europe 1500–1800. London: Indianapolis, IN: Hacket Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, S. (Ed.). (1995). Hitchcock on Hitchcock. Selected writings and Interviews. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, S. (2002). Early Hitchcock: The German influence. In , S. C. (Eds.), Framing Hitchcock (). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, S. (Ed.). (2015). Hitchcock on Hitchcock. Selected writings and interviews (Vol. 2). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1971). Enter Plato. Classical Greece and the origins of social theory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1973/1979). The coming crisis of western sociology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1976) The dialectic of ideology and technology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1979). The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1985). Against fragmentation. The origins of Marxism and the sociology of intellectuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, G. (2003). Architecture. In Levinson, J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 555–571). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, L. S. & Seeber, R. S. (1996). Under the Stars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Green, C. (Ed.). (2001). Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, C. (1961/1965). Art and culture. Critical essays. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Greene, M. (2009). Geology. In Bowler, P. J. & Pickstone, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science. Volume 6: The modern biological and earth Sciences (pp. 167–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, P. (1990). Less then a treason. Hemingway in Paris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grosskurth, P. (1991). The secret ring. Freud’s inner circle and the politics of psychoanalysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B. (Ed.). (1965). Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.Google Scholar
Guttman, B., Griffiths, A. Suzuki, D. & Cullis, T. (2002/2011). Genetics: A beginners guide. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Gumprecht, H. (1998).”New Weimar unter Palmen.” Deutsche Schriftsteller im Exil in Los Angeles. Berlin: Afbau Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1968b). Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1995). Working in a new world: The taxonomic solution. In Harnich, P. (Ed.), World changes. Thomas Kuhn and the nature of science (pp. 259–274). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hackstaff, K., Kupferberg, F. & Negroni, C. (Eds.). (2012). Biography and turning points in Europe and America. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hacomen, M. H. (2000). Karl Popper. The formative years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995). Philosophy of science. In Barnes, J. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle (pp. 109–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2009). Causes. In Anagnostopoulos, G. (Ed.), A Companion to Aristotle (pp. 213–229). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harrigan, C. & Capon, R. (2007/2013). Abstract and colour. Techniques in painting. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. (1994). Abstract expressionism. In Stangos, G. (Eds.), Concepts of modern art (3rd enlarged and updated ed.) (pp. 169–211). London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Hart, J. P. & Terrell, E. (Ed.). (2002). Darwin and archaeology. A handbook of key concepts (pp. 69–87). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Hauser, A. (1979). Kunstens og litteraturens socialhistoria I & 2. Copenhagen: Rhodos.Google Scholar
Hayman, R. (1985). Writing against. A biography of Sartre. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Helfenstein, J. & Osadtschy, O. (Eds.) (2017).Chagall. The breakthrough years 1911–1917. Cologne: Kunstmuseum Basel/Verlag der Buchhandlung Walter König.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Vorlesungen übet die Ästhetik I‒III. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Heilbut, A. (1983). Exiled in paradise. German refugee artists and intellectuals in America from the 1930s to the present. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Helgeson, S. & Nyberg, K. (2002). Swedish design. The best in Swedish design today. Stockholm: Prisma.Google Scholar
Heller, N. (2020). Big spenders.Venture capital shaped the past decade. Will it destroy the next? The New Yorker, Jan. 27, 26–31.Google Scholar
Henry, J. (1997/2008). The scientific revolution and the origins of modern science (3rd ed.). London:Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Herbert, R. L. (1988). Impressionism. art, leisure and Parisian society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, S. & Norman, D. (2009). Darwin’s geology and perspective on the fossil record. In Ruse, M. & Richards, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the “Origins of species” (pp. 129–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herf, J. (1997). Divided memory. The Nazi past in the two Germanys. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, L. & Vervaeck, B. (2001/2005). Handbook of narrative analysis. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, A. (1996). Einstein. Der Weltweise und sein Jahrhundert. Eine Biographie. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1956). The strategy of economic development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1963). Journeys towards progress. Studies of economic policymaking in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1967). Development projects observed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyality. Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The passions and the interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Shifting involvements. Private interest and public action. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1986). Rival views of market society and other recent essays. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1995). A propensity to self-subversion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (2001). Crossing boundaries. Selected writings. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Hitchcock O’Connel, P. & Bouzerau, L (2003/2004). Alma Hitchcock. The woman behind the man. New York: Berkeley Books.Google Scholar
Hjort, M. & Laver, S. (Eds.). (1997). Emotion and the arts. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, J. (1975). Everybody who was anybody. A biography of Gertrude Stein. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hodge, J. & Radick, G. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge companion to Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (1994). Economics and evolution. Bringing life back into economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hof Hoyningen- Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s philosophy of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, P. (1981).Political pilgrims: Travels of western intellectuals to the Soviet Union, China, and Cuba 1928–1979. New York: Harper Colophon Editions.Google Scholar
Holm, M. H. & Tøjner, P. E. (2008). Per Kirkeby Louisiana. Humlebæk: Louisiana Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Hollows, J., Hutchins, P. & Jancovick, M. (2000). The film studies reader. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Holroyd, M. (1988). George Bernard Shaw 1. The search for love. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1988). Thematic origins in scientific thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1992). Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Honour, H. & Fleming, J. (1982/1984). The visual arts. A history. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. W. (1944/1979). Dialektik der Aufklärung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Huffington, A. S. (1988). Picasso. Creator and destroyer. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. S. (1975). The sea change. The migration of social thought, 1930–1965. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Idestam-Almquist, B. (1939). Den svenska filmens drama. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.Google Scholar
Irwin, W. H. (1928/1970). The house the shadows built. New York: Arno Press & The New York Times.Google Scholar
Isaacson, W. (2008). Einstein. His life and universe. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Becket. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1989). Prospecting. From reader response to literary anthropology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1999). The Imaginary. In Wolfreys, J. (Ed.), Literary theories (pp. 178– 196). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Israel, J. (1968/1971). Alienation. Från Marx till modern sociology (2nd rev. ed.). Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren.Google Scholar
Jacob, M. C. (1997). Scientific culture and the making of the industrial west. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaki, S. L. (1984). Uneasy genius: The life and work of Pierre Duhem. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, H. & Lange, H. (1972). Bertold Brecht. Leben des Galileo. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Johnson, P (1991). The birth of the modern. World society 1815–1830. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Jones, S. (1994/2000). The language of genes. Biology, history and the evolutionary future. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Jones, S. (2001). Almost like a whale. The origins of species updated. London: Transworld Publishers.Google Scholar
Jones, S. (2009). Darwin’s island. The Galapagos and the garden of England. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Judson, H. F. (1996/2013). The eighth day of creation. Makers of the revolution in biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Kahnweiler, D. H. (1980). Introduction: A free man. In Penrose, R. & Golding, J. (Eds.), Picasso in retrospect (pp. 1–3). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790/1997). Art and genius. In Feagin, S. & Patrick Maynard, P. (Eds.), Aesthetics (pp. 180–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karlsson, I. & Ruth, A. (1983). Samhället som teater. Estetik och politik i Tredje Riket. Stockholm: Liberförlag.Google Scholar
Karmel, P. (2003). Picasso and the invention of Cubism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, S. D. (1991). Film directing, shot by shot. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.Google Scholar
Keynes, R. (2003). Fossils, finches and fuegians. Charles Darwin’s adventures and discoveries on the Beagle. 1832–1836. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Killick, D. (2000). Science, speculation and the origins of extractive metallurgy. In Brothwell, D. R. & Pollard, A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of archeological sciences (pp. 483–492). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
King, G. (2002). New Hollywood cinema. An introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. (1989). Adaptors and innovators. Styles of creativity and problem solving. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kivy, P. (2002/2008). Emotions in the music. In Can, S. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comprehensive anthology (pp. 628–636). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kjørup, S. (1971). Aestiske problemer. En indfoering i kunstens filosofi. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kjørup, S. (1995). Hvorfor smiler Mona Lisa? En bog om billeder og billedbrug. Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences Make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. (2005). The fabrication of facts: Toward a microsociology of scientific knowledge. In Stehr, N. & Meja, V. (Eds.), Society and knowledge. Contemporary perspectives in the sociology of knowledge and Ssience (pp. 175–195). New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.Google Scholar
Koren, Y. & Negev, E. (2006). Lover of unreason. Assia Wevill, Sylvia Plath’s rival and Ted Hughes’ doomed love. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Koskinen, M. (2001). Ingmar Bergman: “Allting föreställer, ingenting är.” Nora: Ny Doxa.Google Scholar
Koskinen, M. (2002). I begynnelsen var ordet: Ingmar Bergman och hans tidiga författarskap. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.Google Scholar
Koskinen, M. & Rhodin, M. (2005). Fanny och Alexander. Stockholm: Walsttröm & Widstrand.Google Scholar
Kostof, S. (1985). A history of architecture. Settings and rituals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koszarski, R. (1983). The man you love to hate. Erich von Stroheim and Hollywood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kracauer, S. (1965).Theory of Film. The Redemption of Physical Reality. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraft, H. (Ed.). (1984). Psychoanalyse, Kunst und Kreativität heute. Die Entwicklung der analytischen Kunstpsychologie seit Freud. Cologne: DuMont Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. E. (1986). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2000). Repraesentation, laering og subjektivitet: Et socialsemiotisk perspektiv. In Bjerg, J. (Eds.), Paedagogik – en grundbog til et fag (pp. 210–244). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogburn, J. & Tsaratelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. The rethorics of the science class room. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P.-O. (1978/2008). The modern system of the arts. In Can, S. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comprehensive anthology (pp. 3–15). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. (1976/2007). Chapters in a mythology. The poetry of Sylvia Plath. Chalford: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1959/1977). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In The Essential tension (pp. 225–239). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962/1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1969/1977). Comment on the relation of science and art. In The Essential Tension (pp. 340–352). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigm. In Suppe, F. (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459–482). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1991). Outline to a theory of creativity. Aalborg: Institute of Development and Planning, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1995b). Biografisk Självgestaltning. Sociologisk Forskning, 32(4), 32–57.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1995c). Nabo til kaos. Unnpublished doctoral dissertation. Aalborg University, Aalborg.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1996a). Kreativt kaos i projektarbejdet. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1996b). The reality of teaching: Bringing disorder back into social theory and the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(2), 227–247.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1996c). From “information control” to “creative chaos.” In Best, H., Becker, U. & Marks, A. (Eds.), Social science in transition. Social science information needs and provisions in a changing Europe (pp. 219–247). Bonn: Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1996d). Humanistiske iværksættere. Institut for Udvikling og Planlægning, Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1996e). The passing of socialism: Transformation, modernity and the East German Sonderweg. In Karasz, P., Plichtova, J. & Krivy, V. (Eds.), Economics and politics. Fifth Bratislava Symposium and East Central Roundtable Conference 17th–20th November, 1994. Proceedings (pp. 41–52). Bratislava: European Cultural Foundation.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1997). Soziologie des berufligen Neuanfangs: Von akademischer Lehrtätigkeit zu beruflicher Selbständigkeit. In Thomas, M. (Ed.), Selbständige, Gründer, Unternehmer. Passagen und Passformen im Umbruch (pp. 188–207). Berlin: Berliner Debatte Wissenschaft Verlag.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1998a). Models of creativity abroad. Migrants, strangers and travellers. European Archive of Sociology, 39, 179–206.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1998b). Transformation as biographical experience. Personal destinies of East Berlin graduates before and after unification. Acta Sociologica, 41(3), 243–267.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1998c). Humanistic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial career commitment. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 10, 171–187.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1999a). The break-up of communism in East Germany and Eastern Europe. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1999b). Kald eller profession. At indtræde i sygeplejeprofessionen. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (1999c). Projektarbejde og kreativitetsteori In Kunudsen, S. V. (Ed.), Projektarbejdets fortid og fremtid (pp. 187–304). Copenhagen: Denmark.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2000). Nationale Identität als existentielle Entscheidung. Frauen in der DDR. In Hoerning, E. M. (Ed.), Biographische Sozialisation (pp. 325–341). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2001a). Passagen in die Selbständigkeit ‒ Typische Verlaufsmuster von Hochschulabsolventen. In Bögenhold, D., Hodenius, B., Kupferberg, F. & Woderich, R. (Eds.), Gründerfernstudium.P assagen in die Selbständigkeit (pp. 83–124). Fernuniversität-Gesamthochschule in Hagen/Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2001b). Talcott Parsons. Moralske handlinger og social orden. In Jakobsen, M. H., Carleheden, M. & Kristiansen, S. (Eds.), Tradition og fornyelse. En problemorientert teorihistorie for sociologien (pp. 361–328). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2002a). The rise and fall of the German Democratic Republic. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2002b). Entreprenörskap som existentiell handling. Sociologisk Forskning, 39(2), 68–103.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2003a). Kritik, tilpassning, autenticitet og kommunikation. Kreativitetsregimer i moderniteten. Dansk Sociologi, 14(3), 43–62.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2003b). From Berlin to Hollywood: German-speaking refugees in the American film industry. In Timms, E. & Hughes, J. (Eds.), Intellectual Migration and Cultural Transformation (pp. 139–154). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2003c). The established and the newcomers: What makes immigrant and women entrepreneurs so special? International Review of Sociology, 13(1), 89–104.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2004a). Ethnic entrepreneurship as innovation. Theoretical considerations and policy implications. In Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J. & Apitzsch, U. (Eds.), Biographical methods and professional practice (pp. 73–90). Bristol: Policy.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2004b). Læring eller kreativitet. Pædagogisk professionalitet i den kreative økonomi. In Hjort, K. (Ed.), Professionsforskning (pp. 43–56). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2006b). Creativity regimes. Innovation norms and struggles for recognition in the early U.S. car and film industries. International Studies of Management & Organization, 36(1), 81–103.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2007).Läraruppdragets egenart och rollmodeller: Kreativitetsregimer i hybridmoderniteten. Educare, 1, 53–75.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2008a). Pedagogisk iscensättande av kreativt lärande. In Ali, C. and Blossing, U. (Eds.), Lärares liv och arbete. Stockholm: Pedagogiska magasinet.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2008b). Konstnärligt skapande och konstpedagogik i hybridmoderniteten. In Lindstrand, F. & Selander, S. (Eds.), Estetiska lärprocesser (pp. 103–120). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2009a). Farvel til “de rigtige svars” pædagogik. In Tanggaard, L. & Brinkman, S. (Eds.), Kreativitetsfremmende laeringsmiljöer i skolen (pp. 27–54). Frederikshavn: Dafolo.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2009b). How curiosity for facts, explanation and skills can become part of the curriculum. Nesse Seminar, 20 November. Brussels: The European Commission.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2009c) Schools as sites of creativity: Staging creative teaching and learning. Paper addressed to the Creativity Ambassadors of the EU for 2009. Malmö: Malmö Högskola.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2010). Hidden impacts of a cultural migration. Traces of Lewis Coser’s transatlantic experiences in his sociological work. In Schrecker, C. (Ed.), Transatlantic Voyages and Sociology (pp. 239–254). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2011). Homo pedagogicus. Kreativt lärande och pedagogiska språkhandlingar. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 16(2), 44–158.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2012a). Unpacking biographical narratives: Investigating stories of artistic careers in Northern Jutland, Denmark. In Hackstaff, K, Kupferberg, F & Negroni, C (Eds.), Biography and turning points in Europe and America (pp. 9–40). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2012b). Theorizing turning points and decoding narratives. In Hackstaff, K., Kupferberg, F. & Negroni, C. (Eds.), Biography and turning points in Europe and America (pp. 227–259). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2012c). Från lärarvetenskap till lärandevetenskap. Lärandets gåta och pedagogikens plats i vetenskapssystemet. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 17(3), 222–252.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2013). Medierat lärande och pedagogisk teori. In Amhag, L., Kupferberg, F. & Leijon, M. (Ed.), Medierat lärande och pedagogisk mångfald (pp. 15–51). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2014a). Den udviklende skole. Skolen i morgen. Tidskrift for skoleledelse, 17(7): 2–4.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2014b). Entreprenörskap som problembaserat lärande. S. 73–98 i Bali Lelinge & Pär Widén. Entreprenöriellt lärande i skolan. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2016). Den fænomenologske fortæller. In Bo, I. G., Christensen, A.-D. & Thomsen, T. L. (Eds.), Narrativ forskning.Tilgange og metoder (pp. 149–166). Copenhagen: Han Reitzel.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2017a). Transformative agency as social construction. Overcoming knowledge constraints in science. Art and Technology. Social Science Information, 56(3) 454–476.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2017b). Konst och bilddidaktik. In Häggström, M. & Marner, A. (Eds.), Visuell kunskap för multimodalt lärande (pp. 195–192). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2018a). Problemsituationer och kulturella resurser. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 23 (1– 2), 3–14.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, F. (2018b). Biography research in the Nordic countries. In Lutz, H., Schiebel, M. & Tuider, E. (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 765–776). Vienna: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I (1974). Popper on demarcation and induction. In Schlipp, P. A. (Eds.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper.(pp. 241–271). La Salle, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers. Volume XIV Book I.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical Papers Vol. I. (Worrall, J. & Currie, G. eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the growth of scientific. knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1983). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. & Olsen, S. H. (1994). Truth, fiction and literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lampugnani, V. M. (Ed.). (1963/1986). Encyclopedia of the 20th century architecture. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Langer, S. K. (1948/1958). Philosophy in a New Key. A study in the symbolism of reason, rite and art. New York: Mentor Book.Google Scholar
Langer, S. K. (1953/2008). Feeling and form. In Cahn, S. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comparative anthology (pp. 317– 326). Malden, MA. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1959). The social setting of creativity. In Anderson, H. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 203‒221). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1984/1993). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In Lynch, M. & Wolgar, S. (Eds.), Representations in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2000a). When things strike back: A possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51(19), 107–123.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2000b). On the partial existence of existing and non-existing objects. In Daston, L. (Ed.), Biographies of scientific objects (pp. 247–269). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. & Wolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Latour, B. & Wolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Towards a theory of scientific growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1981a). Science and hypothesis. historical essays on scientific methodology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1981b) A problem solving approach to scientific progress. In Hacking, I. (Ed.), Scientific revolutions (pp. 144–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, R. (1984). The nature of technological knowledge. Are models of scientific change relevant? Dordrecht: Seidel.Google Scholar
Laudan, R. (1987). From mineralogy to geology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1990). Science and relativism. Some key controversies in the philosophy of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. & Leplin, J. (1991/2007). Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. In Lange, M. (Ed.), Philosophy of Science (pp. 248–261). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning – legitimate periphery participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leader, Z. (2015). The life of Saul Bellow. To fame and fortune 1915–1964. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Leonard- Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge. Building and sustaining sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Lepsky, K. (1996). Art and language. Ernst H. Gombrich and Karl Bühler’s theory of language. In Woodfield, R. (Ed.), Gombrich on art and psychology (pp. 1–26). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lessing, D. (1994).Under my skin. Volume 1 of my autobiography to 1949. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Lessing, G. (2008). Lacoon. In Cann, C. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comparative anthology (pp. 122–130). Malden, MA. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levin, C. (2008). Creativity in the school context. Lund: Department of Psychology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. C. & Westman, R. S. (Eds.). (1990). Reappraisals of the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindström, L. (2007). Gardner om hur vi tänker. In Forsell, A. (Ed.), Boken om pedagogerna (pp. 212‒235). Stickholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1979). The first new nation. The United States in a comparative perspective. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1968). Aristotle: The growth and structure of his thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1970). Early Greek science: Thales to Aristotle. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991). Methods and problems in Greek science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2002). The ambitions of curiosity. Understanding the world in Ancient Greece and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucie-Smith, E. (1999). Konstnärsliv. 1900-talets stora mästare. Stockholm: Alberg Bonniers.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1994). Copierte Existenz und Karriere. Zur Herstellung von Individualität. In Beck, U. & Beck-Gernstein, E. (Eds.), Risikante Freiheiten (pp. 191–200). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995/2000). Art as a social system. Stanford, CA. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. (1830/2009). Principles of geology. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyell, C (1832/2009). Principles of geology. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. (1833/2009). Principles of geology. Volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. &. O’Brien, M. J. (1998). The goals of evolutionary archeology. History and explanation. Current Anthropology, 19(5), 615–652.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. & O’Brien, M. J. (2002). Classification. In Hart, J. P. & Terrell, J. E. (Eds.), Darwin and archaeology. A handbook of key concepts (pp. 69– 87). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Lyon, J. K. (1980) Bertolt Brecht in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Magalener, M. & Kain, R. M. (1955/1990). Joyce. The man, the work, the reputation. New York: Plantin Publishers.Google Scholar
Maland, C. J. (1989). Chaplin and American culture. The evolution of a star image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1948). Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays (Redfield, R. ed.). Glencoe, IL. Free Press.Google Scholar
Manco, J. (2013). Ancestral journeys. The peopling of Europe from the first centuries to the Vikings. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1972). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Margulis, L. & Sagan, D. (2003). Acquiring genomes. A theory of the origins of species. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Markovits, I. (1995). Die Abwicklung. Eine Tagebuch zum Ende der DDR-Justiz. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1890/1916). Principles of economics. An introductory volume. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, S. (1988). Mayer and Thalberg. The make-believe saints. Hollywood: Samuel French.Google Scholar
Mathews, N. M. (2001). Paul Gauguin. An erotic life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
May, L. L. (1980). Screening out the past. The birth of mass culture and the motion picture industry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
May, L. L. & May, E. T. (1982). Why Jewish movie moguls: An exploration in American culture. American Jewish History, 72(1), 6–25.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942/1999). Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1998). This is biology. The science of the living world. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (2004/2007). What makes biology unique? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDougal, D. (2001). The last mogul. Lew Wasserman, MCA, and the hidden history of Hollywood. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
McFall, L. (2002). Advertising, persuation and the culture/dicotomy dualism. In Gay, P. du & Pyke, M. (Eds.), Cultural economy (pp. 149–165). London: Sage.Google Scholar
McKeon, M. (Ed.). (2000). Theory of the novel. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McLellanIII, J. E. & Dorn, H. (1999). Science and technology in world history. An introduction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McQuail, D. (Ed.). (2002). McQuail’s reader in mass commuication theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934/1967). Mind, self & society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meade, M. (2000/2001). The unruly life of Woody Allen. Lanham, MD: Cooper Square Press.Google Scholar
Meecham, P. & Sheldon, J. (2005). Modern art: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meerttin, R. K. (1963b/1973). The ambivalence of scientists. In Storrer, N. W. (Ed.), The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 383–412). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meldolesi, L. (1995). Discovering the possible: The surprising World of Albert O. Hirschman. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Menger, P.-M. (1989). Rationalité et incertitude de la vie d’artiste. L’Anné sociologique, 39, 111–151.Google Scholar
Menger, P.-M. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 541–574.Google Scholar
Menger, P.-M. & Gurgang, M. (1996). Work and compensated unemployment in the performing arts. Exogenous and endogenous uncertainty in artistic labour markets. In Ginsburgh, V. A. & Menger, P.-M. (Eds.), Economics of the arts. Selected essays (pp. 347–381). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1938/1970). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1942/1968). Science and democratic social structure. In Social Theory and Social Structure (pp. 604–615). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1961/1973). Singletons and multiples in science. In Storrer, N. W. (Ed.), The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 325–342). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1963/1973a). Multiple discoveries and strategic research site. In Storrer, N. W. (Ed.), The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical Investigations (pp. 371–382). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1963/1973b). The ambivalence of scientists. In Storrer, N. W. (Ed.), The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 383‒412). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968a). The sociology of knowledge. In Social theory and social structure (pp. 510–542). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968b). Karl Mannheim and the sociology of knowledge. In Social theory and social structure (pp. 543–562). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968/1973). The Mathew effect in science. In (Ed.). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 419–438). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1976). Sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. & Garton, J (1977). The sociology of science in Europe. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, D. (2004) Her husband. Ted Hughes and Sylvia Plath. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Migayrou, F. (2015). Eyes within eyes. Architecture and mathesis. In Cinqualabre, O. & Migayrou, F. (Ed.), Le Corbusier. The measures of man (pp. 14–25). Zurich: Scheidegger & Spiess.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2006). Out of error. Further essays in critical rationalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. (Ed.) (1998). Creativity in human evolution and prehistory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mizener, A. (1958). F. Scott Fitzgerald: A biographical and critical study. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1990a). The lever of riches. Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2002). The gift of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2009). The enlightened economy. Britain and the industrial revolution 1700–1850. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory. Sensitizing terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft 50: 253–269.Google Scholar
Moon, C., Miller, W. F., Hancock, M. G. & Rowen, H. S. (Eds.). (2000). The Silicion valley edge. A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morell, L. (2004). Kunstneren som polyhistor. “Den intellektuelle overbygning” i Per Kirkeby’s værk. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Morell, L. (2011). Jorn afer Jorn. In Jørgensen, J-E. (Ed.), Jorn International (pp. 189–194). Aarhus: AROS.Google Scholar
Mothersill, M (1986/2008). Beauty restored. In Can, S. M. & Meskin, A. (Eds.), Aesthetics. A comprehensive anthology (pp. 509–520). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moulin, R. (1987). The French art market. A sociological view. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Muhlstein, A. (1984). Baron James. The rise and fall of the Rothschilds. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (2007). När jorden stod stilla. Galileo Galilei och hans tid. Stockholm: Leopard.Google Scholar
Naremore, J. (1988). Acting in the cinema. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nercessian, N. J. (1998). Kuhn and the cognitive revolution. Configurations, 6(1), 87–120.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. & Kvale, S. (2000). Mästarlära. Lärande som social praxis. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1999). The birth of tragedy and other writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. A. (1969/1970). Social change and history. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J. & Lyman, R. L. (2000). Darwinian evolutionism is applicable to historical archeology. International Journal of Historical Archeology, 4 (1), 71–112.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L. & Schiffer, M. B. (2005) Archeology as a process. Processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, D. (2009). Geophysics and geochemistry. In Bowler, P. J. & Pickstone, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science. Volume 6: The modern biological and earth sciences (pp. 395–214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olby, R. (1974/1994). The path to the double helix. The discovery of DNA. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Olby, R. (2009). Francis Crick. Hunter of life’s secrets. Cold Spring Habor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press.Google Scholar
Olivier, F. (2001). Loving Picasso. The private journal of Fernande Olivier. New York: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. H. (1987). The end of literary theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1946/1968). Why I write. In Orwell, S. & Angus, I. (Eds.), The collected essays, journalism and letters of George Orwell. Volume 1: An age like this 1920–1940 (pp. 1–7). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1931/1968a). A hanging. In Orwell, S. & Angus, I. (Eds.), The vollected essays, journalism and letters of George Orwell. Vol. 1: An age like this, 1920–1940 (pp. 44–48). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1931/1968b). The spike. In Orwell, S. & Angus, I. (Eds.), The vollected essays, journalism and letters of George Orwell. Vol. 1: An age like this, 1920–1940 (pp. 36–43). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Papagianni, D. & Morse, M. A. (2013). The Neanderthals rediscovered. How modern science is rewriting their story. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1939/1964). The professions and social structure. In Essays in sociological theory (pp. 34–49). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1964). Introduction. In Weber, M. (Ed.), The sociology of religion (pp. xix‒llxvii). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pasternak, A. (2016). Lara. The untold love story that inspired Doctor Zhivago. London: William Collins.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (1995). Smart schools. Better thinking and learning for every child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Petrosky, H. (1996). Invention by design. How engineers get from thought to things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pevsner, N. (1936/1991). Pioneers of modern design. From William Morris to Walter Gropius. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, J. E. (1977). The emergence of society. A prehistory of the establishment. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, J. (1982). The creative explosion. An inquiry into the origins of art and religion. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. S. (1991). Pierce on signs. Writings on semiotics by Charles Sander Pierce (Hoopes, J. ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pine II, B. J. & Gilmore, J. H (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, July‒August, 97–105.Google Scholar
Pine II, B. J. & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Plath, S. (1975). Letters home. Correspondence 1950–1963. (Plath, A. S. ed. and selected with a commentary). London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Plath, S. (1992/2008). The collected poems of Sylvia Plath. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Plath, S. (2000). The unabridged journals of Sylvia Plath (Kukil, K. W. ed.). New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Toward a post-critical philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. (1998). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1947/1966). The open society and its enemies (vols 1 & 2) (5th ed. rev.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1968) Remarks on the problems of demarcation and rationality. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. E. (Eds.), Problems in the philosophy of science (pp. 88–102). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1969/1977).The logic of social science. In Adorno, T. W. (Ed.), Positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 87–104). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1974). Autobiography of Karl Popper. In Schlipp, P. A. (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper. (pp. 3–83). La Salle, IL: The library of living philosophers. Volume XIV Book IGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1994a). The myth of the framework (Notturno, M. A. ed). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Powdermaker, H. (1950) Hollywood. The dream factory. Boston, MA: Little Brown. and Company.Google Scholar
Prideaux, S. (2005). Edvard Munch. Behind the scream. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsay, T. (1926/1964). A million and one nights. A history of the motion picture. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2009). The nature and goals of rhetoric. In Anagnostopoulos, G. (Eds.), A companion to Aristotle (pp. 579–596). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P. (2008). Archaelogy: Theory, methods and practice. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. & Morley, I. (Eds.). (2009). Becoming human. Innovation in prehistoric material andspiritual culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Repcheck, J. (2003/2009). The man who found time. James Hutton and the discovery of the earth’s antiquity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (2009). Classification in Darwin’s origins. In Richards, R. J. & Ruse, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the origins of species (pp. 172–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. & Ruse, M. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge companion to the origins of species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2007/2009). A life of Picasso, Volume III. The triumphant years 1917–1932. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Narrative time. In Mitchell, W. J. T. (Ed.), On narrative (pp. 165–186). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1985). Time and narrative. Volume 2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. (1996). From peep show to palace. The birth of American Film. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Roe, S. (2015). In Montmartre. Picasso, Matisse and the birth of Modernist art. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. & Larsen, J. K. (1984). Silicon Valley fever. Growth of high-tech culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (1997). The Impressionists. Their lives, their work, their paintings. New York: Penguin Studio.Google Scholar
Romer, J. (2012/2013). A history of Ancient Egypt. From the first farmers to the great pyramids. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box. Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (2000). Schumpeter and the endogenity of technology. Some American perspectives.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (2010). Studies on science and the innovation process. Pistcataway, NJ: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, R. (1986). The demoiselles. Sketchbook no. 42, 1907. In Glimcher, A. & Glimcher, M. (Eds.), The sketchbooks of Picasso (pp. 53–80). London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Ross, S. (2003). Style in art. In Evinson, J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 228–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosten, L. (1941). Hollywood. The movie colony, the movie makers. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Rothko, M. (2004). The artist’s reality. Philosophies of art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, B. (1977). Jean Piaget. Psychologist of the real. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, S. & Lichter, S. B. (1982). Roots of radicalism. Jews, Christians and the new left. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowley, H. (2005). Tête-à-tête. Simone de Beauvoi and Jean-Paul Sartre. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Rubin, W. (Ed.). (1984). Primitivism in 20th century art. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Rubin, W. (1989). Picasso and Braque. Pioneering Cubism. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Rubin, W. (1994). The genesis of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. In Rubin, W., Seckel, H. & Cousins, J. (Eds.). Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (pp. 118–144). New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. (1996). Geological travel and theoretical innovation: The role of “liminal” experience. Social Studies of Science, 26, 143–159.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1979/1999). The Darwinian revolution. Science red in tooth and claw. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (2006). Darwinism and its discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Säljö, R. (1984/1986). Att lära genom att läsa. In Marton, F., Hæuunsell, D. & Entwistle, N. (Eds.), Hur vi lär (pp. 102–125). Stockholm: Prisma.Google Scholar
Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande and kulturella redskap. Lärprocesser och det kollektiva minnet. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Sarup, M. (1988). An Introductory guide to Post-structuralism and Postmodernism. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Sawin, M. (1995/1997). Surrealism in exile and the beginning of the New York school. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity. The science of human innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saxenian, A. (1991). The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy 20, 423–437.Google Scholar
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shackelford, G. T. M. & Frèches-Thory, C. (2004). Gauguin Tahiti. The studio of the South Seas. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Sharff, S. (1982). The Elements of Cinema. Toward a Theory of Cinesthetic Impact. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Schatz, T. (1981). Hollywood genres: Formulas, filmmaking and the studio system. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Schatz, T. (1988). The genius of the system. Hollywood film-making in the studio era. New York: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Schellewald, B. (2017). Searching for traces. Chagall and icons. In Helfenstein, K., & Osadtschy, O. (Eds.), Chagall. The breakthrough years, 1911–1919 (pp. 102–115). Cologne: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König.Google Scholar
Schepelern, P. (2000). Lars von Triers film: tvang og befrielse. Copenhagen: Rosinante.Google Scholar
Schjeldahl, P. (2020). The shape of things. Donald Judd in retrospect. The New Yorker, March 9, 82–83.Google Scholar
Schmitz, M. (1995). Wendestress. Die psychosozialen Kosten der deutschen Einheit. Berlin: Rohwolt.Google Scholar
Schnauber, C. (1992). Spaziergänge durch das Hollywood der Emigranten. Zurich: Arche Verlag.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. (1981). Language, narrative, and anti-narrative. In Mitchell, W. J. T. (Ed.), On narrative (pp. 200–208). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. (1982). Semiotics and interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflexive practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1945/1979). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Schuster, P.- K. (2008). The world as fragment. Building blocks of the Klee universe. In Scholz, D. & Thomson, C. (Ed.), The Klee Universe (pp. 15–24). Berlin: HatjeCantx.Google Scholar
Schusterman, R. (2003). Aesthetics and postmodernism. In Levinson, J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 771–782). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seger, L. (1992). The art of adaption: Turning fact and fiction into film. New York: Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Server, L. (1987). Screenwriters. Words become pictures. Pittstown, NJ: Main Street Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (1996). The scientific revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sharff, S. (1982). The elements of cinema. Toward a theory of cinesthetic impact. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Shiff, R. (1984). Cézanne and the end of impressionism. A study of the theory, technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1970). Tradition, ecology, and institution in the history of sociology. Daedalus, 99(4): 760–825.Google Scholar
Sikov, E. (1998). On Sunset Boulevard. The life and times of Billy Wilder. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1964). The sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated, edited and with an introduction by K. H. Wolff. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309–328.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2007). The creative process in Picasso’s Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvement versus nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 329–344.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Review, 7, 156–179.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011a). Creativity and discovery as blind variation. Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 158–174.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011b). Big-C creativity in the big city. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, Å. E. & Melander, C. (Eds.), Handbook of creative cities (pp. 72–84). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sjögren, H. (2002). Lek och raseri. Ingmar Bergmans teater 1938–2002. Stockholm: Carlsson.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. S. (1983). Adam Smith F.R.S.E. (1723–1790). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sloan, P. R. (2009) The making of a philosophical naturalist. In Hodge, J. & Radick, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Darwin (2nd ed.) (pp. 21‒43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. H. & Beccaloni, G. (Eds.). (2009). Natural selection and beyond. The intellectual legacy of Alfred Russell Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2000). Hitchcock: Suspense, humour and tone. London. British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1980/1994). Conceptual Art. In Stangos, N (Ed.), Concepts of modern art. From Fauvism to Postmodernism (pp. 256–270). London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Snodin, M. & Stavenow-Hidemark, E. (1997). Carl och Karin Larsson. Skapare av ett svenskt ideal. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Förlag.Google Scholar
Sonesson, G. (1992). Bildbetydelser. Inledning till bildsemiotiken som vetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Sontag, S. (1966/2013). Against interpretation. In Rieff, D. (Ed.), Essays of the 1960s and 70s (pp. 10–285). New York: The Library of America.Google Scholar
Sperling, C. W. & Miller, C. (1998). Hollywood be thy name. The Warner Brothers story. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Spoto, D. (1983/1998). The dark side of genius. The life of Alfred Hitchcock. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
Spoto, D. (2009). Spellbound by beauty. Alfred Hitchcock and his leading ladies. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar
Spurling, H. (2003). The girl from the fiction department. A portrait of Sonia Orwell. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Staiger, J. (Ed.) (1995). The studio system. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stangos, N. (Ed.). (1974/1994). Concepts of modern art. From Fauvism to Postmodernism (2nd ed.). London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Stanislavskij, K. (1944). Mit liv i kunsten. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Stanislavskij, K. (1967) En skuespillers arbejde med sig selv. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Starko, A. J. (2001). Creativity in the class room: Schools of curious delight. Mahwav, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stecker, R. (2003). Definitions of art. In Levinson, J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 136–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steffensen, E. (2017). At trække en streg. Per Kirkeby, liv og værk. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Steinberg, S. (1989). The ethnic myth. Race, ethnicity and class in America. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Stenberg, H. (2002). Att bli konstnär. Lund: Sociologiske Institutionen, Lunds Universitet.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1988). The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In March, J. G. (Ed.), handbook of organisations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: RandMcNally.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. D. (2001). Variability, constraints and creativity. American Psychologist, 56(4), 353–359.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. (1959). Mirrors and masks. The search for identity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. (2004). Alfred Hitchcock’s silent films. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
Stringer, C. & Andrews, P. (2005). The complete world of human evolution. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Strong, B. & Davies, M. (2006/2011a). History of creativity in the arts, science, and technology, USA Pre-1500 (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt. 1500Google Scholar
Strong, B. & Davies, M. (2006/2011b). History of creativity in the arts, science, and technology, USA 1500-present (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
Sturken, M. & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking. An introduction to visual culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. Jr. (1996). Born to rebel. Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1974). The structure of scientific theory. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Svedjedal, J. (1999). Skrivaredans. Birger Sjöbergs liv och diktning. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. (Ed.) (2000). Entrepreneurship.The social science view. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science. Turning to the context of discovery. Theory and Society, 41(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Symons, J. (1987). Makers of the new. The revolution in literature. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Tafdrup, P. (1991/1997). Över vattnet jag går. Skiss till en poetik. Stockholm: Ellerströms.Google Scholar
Tan, A.-G. (2007). (Ed.). Creativity. A handbook for teachers. Piscataway, NJ: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1978). Hitch: The life and times of Alfred Hitchcock. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1983). Strangers in paradise. The Hollywood émigreés 1933–1950. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Therborn, G. (1977). Science, class and society. On the formation of sociology and historical materialism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (2006). How to read a modern painting. Understanding and enjoying the modern masters. London: Thames & Hudson,Google Scholar
Thompson, K. (1985). Exporting entertainment. America in the world film market. 1917–1934. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. & Bordwell, D. (2003). Film history: An introduction. London:McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thomson, B. (2000). Impressionism. Origins, practice, reception. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Thoren, V. (1990). The lord of Uranborg, A biography of Tycho Brahe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tøjner, P. E. (2008). Maleri som scene. In Holm, M. J. & Tøjner, P. E. (Eds.), Per Kirkeby. Louisiana 2008 (pp. 12–27). Humlebæk: Louisiana Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (1945). Democracy in America (vols I & II). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. (1989). A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tudge, C. (2005). The tree. A natural history of what trees are, how they live, and why they matter. New York: Three River Press.Google Scholar
Tudge, C. (2008). The bird. A natural history of who birds are, where they came from, and how they live. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1962). The intellectual pre-eminence of Jews in modern Europe. In Lernerr, M. (Ed.), The portable veblen (pp. 476–479). New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1968). Imperial Germany and the industrial revolution. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Vest, J. M. (2003). Hitchcock and France. The forging of an author. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Vincenti, W. G. (1990 /1993). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner-Martin, L. (2003). Sylvia Plath. A literary life (2nd ed.). Basingstoke. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Waller, J. (2002). Fabulous science. Fact and fiction in the history of discovery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, J. (1992). Making the theoretical case. In Ragin, C. & Becker, H S. (Eds.), What is a case? (pp. 121–137). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wartofsky, M. W. (1968). Conceptual foundations of scientific thought. An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1968/1996). The double helix. A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (2001). Genes, girls and gamow. After the double helix. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1904‒1905/1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922/1964). The sociology of religion (Introduction by T. Parsons). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1948a). Science as vocation. In Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. W. (Eds.), From Max Weber. Essays in sociology (pp. 129–136). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1948b). Class, status and party. In Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. W. (Eds.), From Max Weber. Essays in sociology (pp. 180–195). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization (Parsons, T. ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1976). The agrarian sociology and ancient civilizations. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1983). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Weber, R. J. & Perkins, D. N. (Eds.). (1992). Inventive minds. Creativity in technology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wedberg, A. (1959). Filosofins hisotia. Nyare tiden itll romantiken. Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Wedberg, A. (1967). Filosofin genom tiderna. 1660-talet. 1700-talet. Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Weintraub, L. (2003). Making contemporary art. How modern artists think and work. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity beyond the myth of genius. New York: W. W. Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity, understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wennberg, A. (2007). Tänk om der är så? Om Tycho Brahes instrument och vad han kunde gåora med dem. Landskorna: Kultutnämnden i Landskrona.Google Scholar
Wensierski, H. J. von (1994). Mit uns zieht die alten Zeiten. Biographie und Lebenswelt junger DDR-bürger im gesellschaftlichen Umbruch. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. M. CJ. V. The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. C. (1993). Careers and creativity. Social forces in the arts. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
White, H. C. & White, C. A. (1965/1993). Canvases and careers. Institutional change in the French painting world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. and Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1984). In Elkana, Y. (Ed.), Selected writings on the history of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1989). Theory of scientific methods (by Butts, R. ed. and Introduction). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
White, H. C. &. White, C. A. (1965/1993). Canvases and careers. Institutional change in the French painting world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
White, L. (1964). Medieval technology and social change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, M. & Gribbin, I. (1997). Einstein. A life in science. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Whitfield, E. (1997). Pickford. The woman who made Hollywood. New York: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Whitfield, S. (1967/1994). Fauvism. In Stangos, N. (Ed.), Concepts of Modern Art. from Fauvism to Postmodernism (pp. 11–29). London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittemore, D. & Cecchettini, P. A. (1976). Passport to Hollywood. Film immigrants anthology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1993). Invention. The care and feeding of ideas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wild, J. J. (1992). The origins of soft tissue ultrasonic echoing and early instrumental application to clinical medicine. In Weber, R. J. & Perkins, D. N. (Eds.), Inventive minds. Creativity in technology (pp. 115–141). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Will, B. (2000). Gertrude Stein and the problem of “genius.” Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1980). Sociobiology. The abridged edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, L. G. (1972). Charles Lyell. The years to 1841: The revolution in geology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. & Beardsley, M. C. (1954/1992). Det intentionella felslutet. In Entzenberg, C. & Hansson, C. (Eds.), Modern litteraturteori. Från rysk formalism till dekonstruktion. (pp. 115–130). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodhead, L. (2012). Shopping, seduction and Mr. Selfridge (rev. ed.). London: Profile.Google Scholar
Wray, K. B. (2011). Kuhn and the discovery of paradigms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41(3), 380–397.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (1988). Continuity, chance and change. The character of the industrial revolution in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zahner, N. T. (2006). Die neuen Regeln der Kunst. Andy Warhol und der Umbau des Kunstbetriebs im 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Zalewski, D. (2009). The background hum. Ian McEwan’s art of unease. The New Yorker, February 23, pp.46–61.Google Scholar
Zangwill, N. (2001). The metaphysics of beauty. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziman, J. (1996). Reliable knowledge. An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zukowsky, J. (Ed.). (1988) Chicago architecture. Volume 1: 1872–1922. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar