Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:53:39.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from Complications of ART

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Jan Gerris
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ESHRE, 2012. The world’s number of IVF and ICSI babies has now reached a calculated total of 5 million. www.eshre.eu/press-room/Press-releases.Google Scholar
Dyer, S, Chambers, G M, deMouzon, J, et al. International committee for Monitoring for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: ART 2008, 2009, and 2010. Hum Reprod. Advance access published May 20, 2016: 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serour, G I, Aboulghar, M, Mansour, R, et al. Complications of medically assisted conception in 3500 cycles. Fertil Steril 1998;70:638642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serour, G I. Complications of assisted reproductive technology. In Infertility and Assisted Reproduction, edited by Rizk, B, Garcia-Velasco, J A, Sallam, H, Makrigiannakis, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008: 604618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serour, G I, Rhodes, C, Sattar, M A, Aboulghar, M A, Mansour, R. Complications of assisted reproductive techniques. A review. Assist Reprod 1999;9(4):214232.Google Scholar
Serour, G I. Clinical manifestations of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. In Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, edited by Gerris, J, Delvigne, A, Olivennes, F. Abingdon: Informa Health Care, 2006: 2540.Google Scholar
Margeria, A, Sheldon, S. Parenting post IVF: is age not so relevant after all? Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, A, et al. (In Vitro Fertilization) v. Costa Rica, Judgment of November 28, 2012 (Inter-American Court of Human Rights).Google Scholar
WHO/World Bank Report on Disability, 2011.Google Scholar
Zegers-Hochschild, F, Dickens, B M, Dughman-Manzur, S. Human rights to in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2013;123(1):8689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serour, G I. Ethical issues in human reproduction: Islamic perspectives. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013;29(11):949952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serour, G I. What is it to practice good medical ethics? A Muslim’s perspective. J Med Ethics 2015;41:121124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serour, G I. Attitudes and cultural perspectives on infertility and its alleviation in the Middle East area. In Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction, edited by Vayena, E, Rowe, P J, Griffin, P D. Geneva: WHO, 2002: 4149.Google Scholar
Pandian, Z, Templeton, A, Serour, G I, Bhattacharya, S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2005;20(10):26812687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickens, B M, Cook, R J. The legal status of in vitro embryos. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2010;111(1):9194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serour, G I. Religious perspectives of ethical issues in art. In Contemporary Ethical Dilemmas in Assisted Reproduction, edited by Shenfield, F, Sureau, C. Abingdon: Informa Health Care, 2006: 99114.Google Scholar
Serour, G I. Ethical implications of human embryo research. Publications of the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ISESCO) Series. Mohammedia, Morocco: Imprimerie Fédala, 1421 AH/2000 AD.Google Scholar
Serour, G I. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reprod BioMed Online 2008;17(Suppl 3):3438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuhmcke, A. Tick tock goes the clock: rethinking policy and embryo storage limits. Sydney: University of Technology, Faculty of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2015/2; 2015.Google Scholar
Mohapatra, S. Using egg freezing to extend the biological clock: fertility insurance or false hope? Harvard Law Pol Rev 2014;8(2):381411.Google Scholar
Christman, J. Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves. Philos Stud 2004;117:143164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawande, A. The cost conundrum. The New Yorker, June 1, 2009.Google Scholar
Krause, J. Reconceptualizing informed consent in an era of health care cost containment. Iowa Law Rev 1999;85:261, 363.Google Scholar
Sullivan, E A, Zegers-Hochschild, G, Mansour, R, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report assisted reproductive technology 2004. Hum Reprod 2013;28(5):13751390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kupka, M S, Ferraretti, A P, de Mouzon, J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2014;29(10):20992113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleitman v. Cosgrove (1967), 227 Atlantic Reporter 2d 689 (New Jersey Supreme Court 1967) at 692.Google Scholar
Procanik v. Cillo (1984) 478 Atlantic Reporter 2d 755 (New Jersey Supreme Court 1984).Google Scholar
Steptoe, P C, Edwards, R G Birth after the reimplantation of human embryos. Lancet 1978;2:366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamford, P M, Steele, S J. Uterine and ovarian carcinoma in a patient receiving gonadotropin therapy: a case report. Obstet Gynecol 1982;89:962964.Google Scholar
Schenker, J G, Ezra, Y. Complications of assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril 1994;61:411422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, S C, Spirtas, R, Alexander, N J. Do fertility drugs cause ovarian tumors? J Womens Health 1995;4:247259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemetti, R, Sevon, T, Gissler, M, Hemminki, E. Complication of IVF and ovulation induction. Hum Reprod 2005;20(12):3293–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johannes, C B, Caro, J J, Hartz, S C, et al. Adverse effects of ovulatory stimulants – a review. Assist Reprod Rev 1993;3:6874.Google Scholar
Flam, F, Lundstrom, V, Lindstedt, J, et al. Choriocarcinoma of the fallopian tube associated with induced superovulation in an IVF program: a case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989;33:183186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, A S, Harris, R, Itnyre, J, et al. The Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 U.S. case-control studies. I. Methods. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:11751183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, A S, Harris, R, Itnyre, J. The Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 U.S. case-control studies. II. Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers in white women. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:11841203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R, Whittemore, A S, Itnyre, J. The Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 U.S. Case-control studies. III. Epithelial tumors of low malignant potential in white women. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:12041211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parazzini, F, Negri, E, La Vecchia, C, et al. Treatment for infertility and risk of invasive epithelial cancer. Hum Reprod 1997;12:21592161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosgaard, B J, Lidegaard, O, Kjaer, S K, et al. Infertility, fertility drugs, and invasive ovarian cancer: a case-control study. Fertil Steril 1997;67:10051012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klip, H, Burger, C W, Kenemans, P, Leeuween, V. Cancer risk associated with subfertility and ovulation induction: a review. Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:319344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braga, C, Negri, E, La Vecchia, C, et al. Fertility treatment and risk of breast cancer. Hum Reprod 1996;11:300303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venn, A, Watson, L, Lumley, J, et al. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence after infertility and in vitro fertilization. Lancet 1995;346:9951000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venn, A, Watson, L, Bruinsma, F, Giles, G, Healy, D. Risk of cancer after use of fertility drugs with in vitro fertilization. Lancet 1999;354:15861590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L, Scoccia, B, Moghissi, K S, et al. Breast cancer risk associated with ovulation stimulation drugs. Hum Reprod 2004;19(9):20052013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahdavi, A, Pejovic, T, Nezhat, F. Induction of ovulation and ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2006;85:4:819826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickens, B M, Cook, R J. Multiple pregnancy: legal and ethical issues. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008;103(3):270274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozturk, O, Templeton, A. Multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction techniques. In Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction, edited by Vayena, E, Rowe, P J, Griffin, P D. Geneva: WHO; 2002: 220234.Google Scholar
Wood, C, Trounson, A O. Historical perspectives. In Handbook of In Vitro Fertilization, 2nd ed., edited by Trounson, A O, Gardner, D K. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1999: 114.Google Scholar
Gur, N. Wrongful life claims and negligent selection of gametes or embryos in infertility treatments. A quest for coherence. J Law Med 2014;22(2):426441.Google ScholarPubMed
Scott, R. Reconsidering “Wrongful Life” in England after thirty years: legislative mistakes and unjustifiable anomalies. Cambridge Law J 2013;72(1):115154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R D. Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: the children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 2002;17(12):30113015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickens, B M. The right to conscience. In Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies, edited by Cook, R J, Erdman, J N, Dickens, B M. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014: 210238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, B M. Ethical and legal aspects of noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2013;124(2):181184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greater Glasgow Health Board v. Doogan, [2014] UK Supreme Court 68, para 40.Google Scholar
See the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, as amended in 2003 and 2008.Google Scholar
See e.g. Cook, R, Sclater, S D, Kaganas, F (editors). Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
In the Matter of Baby M. 1988, 537 Atlantic Reporter 2d 1227 (New Jersey Supreme Court), reversing in part 1987, 525 Atlantic Reporter 2d, 1128 (New Jersey Superior Court).Google Scholar
Golombok, S. Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×