Abi-Saab, G., ‘The Appellate Body and Treaty Interpretation’, in Sacerdoti, G. et al. (eds), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System (CUP 2006).Google Scholar

Abrahamson, S. S. & Fischer, M. J., ‘All the World’s a Courtroom: Judging in the New Millennium’, (1997) 26 Hofstra LR 273.Google Scholar

Affolder, N. A., ‘Tadic, the Anonymous Witness and the Sources of International Procedural Law’, (1998) 2 Michigan Journal of International Law 445.Google Scholar

Alexandrov, S. A., ‘Accepting the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice with Reservations: An Overview of Practice with a Focus on Recent Trends and Cases’, (2001) 14 LJIL 89.Google Scholar

Alford, R. P., ‘In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism’, (2005) 52 UCLA LR 639.Google Scholar

Alland, D., ‘L’interprétation du droit international public’, (2012) 362 Recueil des cours 47.Google Scholar

Allott, P., ‘Interpretation – An Exact Act’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D. & Windsor, M. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E., ‘“Beware: Boundary Crossings” – A Critical Appraisal of Public Law Approaches to International Investment Law’, (2016) 17 JWIT 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, J. E. ‘Is Investor–State Arbitration “Public”?’, (2016) 7 JIDS 534.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E. ‘The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment’, (2009) 344 Recueil des cours 193.Google Scholar

An-Na’im, A. A., ‘Islam and Human Rights: Beyond the Universality Debate’, (2000) 94 ASIL Proceedings 95.Google Scholar

Anand, R. P., Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (Asia Publishing House 1961).Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Y., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia 2002).Google Scholar

Arato, J., ‘Accounting for Difference in Treaty Interpretation over Time’, in Bianchi, A. et al. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Arato, J. ‘The Margin of Appreciation in International Investment Law’, (2014) 54 Virginia JIL 545.Google Scholar

Arato, J. ‘Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and their Diverse Consequences’, (2010) 9 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 443.Google Scholar

Arsanjani, M. H. & Reisman, W. M., ‘Interpreting Treaties for the Benefit of Third Parties: The “Salvors’ Doctrine” and the Use of Legislative History in Investment Treaties’, (2010) 104 AJIL 597.Google Scholar

Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd edn, CUP 2014).Google Scholar

Aust, H. P. & Nolte, G. (eds), The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Uniformity, Diversity, Convergence (OUP 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacchus, J., ‘WTO Appellate Body Roundtable’, (2005) 99 ASIL Proceedings 175.Google Scholar

Bader Ginsburg, R., ‘“Decent Respect for the Opinions of [Human]kind”: The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication’, (2005) 64 CLJ 575.Google Scholar

Bader Ginsburg, R. ‘Looking Beyond our Borders: The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication’, (2003) 40 Idaho LR 1.Google Scholar

Bankowski, Z. et al., ‘On Method and Methodology’, in Summers, R. S. & MacCormick, D. N. (eds), Interpreting Statutes (Dartmouth Publishing 1991).Google Scholar

Bantekas, I., ‘Reflections on Some Sources and Methods of International Criminal and Humanitarian Law’, (2006) 6 International Criminal LR 121.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court: An Article-by-Article Evolution of the Statute (Transnational Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C. The Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (Transnational Publishers 1996).Google Scholar

Bates, E., The Evolution of the European Convention of Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (OUP 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckett, E., ‘Comments by Sir Eric Beckett’, (1950) 43[I] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 435.Google Scholar

Beckett, E. ‘De l’interprétation des traites’, (1950) 43[1] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 440.Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., Classical Canons: Rhetoric, Classicism and Treaty Interpretation (Ashgate 2001).Google Scholar

Bell, J., ‘Researching Globalisation: Lessons from Judicial Citations’, (2014) 3 CJICL 961.Google Scholar

Bell, J. ‘The Argumentative Status of Foreign Legal Arguments’, (2012) 8 Utrecht LR 8.Google Scholar

Bentele, U., ‘Mining for Gold: The Constitutional Court of South Africa’s Experience with Comparative Constitutional Law’, (2009) 37 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 219.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E., ‘The Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity and Global Challenges to Democracy’, (2018) 9 JIDS 240.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E. ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’, (1999) 31 NYU JILP 843.Google Scholar

Berman, F., ‘Why do we Need a Law of Treaties?’, (2016) 385 Recueil des cours 9.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, R., ‘Comparative Law in the Interpretation and Application of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Busuttil, S. (ed), Mainly Human Rights: Studies in Honour of JJ Cremona (Fondation Internationale Malte, 1999).Google Scholar

Bianchi, A., ‘Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (In)determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning’ in Bekker, P. et al. (eds), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (CUP 2010).Google Scholar

Bjorge, E., ‘Comparative Law and the Method of Law: Ascertainment of the International Court of Justice’, in Andenas, M. & Fairgrieve, D. (eds), Courts and Comparative Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Bjorge, E. ‘The Vienna Rules, Evolutionary Interpretation, and the Intention of the Parties’, in Bianchi, A. et al., Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Bjorge, E. Domestic Application of the ECHR: Courts as Faithful Trustees (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Bjorge, E. The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (OUP 2014).Google Scholar

Björgvinsson, D. T., The Intersection of International Law and Domestic Law: A Theoretical and Practical Analysis (Edward Elgar 2015).Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A. K. & Nappert, S., ‘Beyond Fragmentation’, in Weiler, T. & Baetens, F. (eds), New Directions in International Economic Law: In Memoriam Thomas Wälde (Brill 2011).Google Scholar

Black, R. C. et al., ‘Upending a Global Debate: An Empirical Analysis of the US Supreme Court’s Use of Transitional Law to Interpret Domestic Doctrine’, (2014) 103 Georgetown LJ 1.Google Scholar

Boas, G. et al., International Criminal Law Practitioner Library, Volume III: International Criminal Procedure (CUP 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobek, M., Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Bogdan, M., ‘General Principles and the Problem of Lacunae in the Law of Nations’, (1977) 46 Nordic JIL 37.Google Scholar

Boon, K., ‘Rape and Forced Pregnancy under the ICC Statute: Human Dignity, Autonomy, and Consent’, (2001) 32 Columbia Human Rights LR 625.Google Scholar

Bradford, W., ‘International Legal Compliance: Surveying the Field’, (2005) 36 Georgetown Journal of International Law 495.Google Scholar

Brauch, J. A., ‘The Dangerous Search for an Elusive Consensus: What the Supreme Court Should Learn from the European Court of Human Rights’, (2009) 52 Howard LJ 277.Google Scholar

Brierly, J. L., ‘The Codification of International Law’, (1948) 47 Michigan LR 2.Google Scholar

Briggs, H. W., ‘Book Review of “The Interpretation of Agreements and World Public Order – Principles of Content and Procedure”’, (1968) 53[3] Cornell LR 543.Google Scholar

Brower, C., ‘W(h)ither International Commercial Arbitration’, (2008) 24 Arbitration International 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C., A Common Law of International Adjudication (OUP 2007).Google Scholar

Brown, C. ‘The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a “General Principle of Law”: Some Preliminary Thoughts’, (2009) 1 Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law (6th edn, OUP 2003).Google Scholar

Brunnée, J. & Toope, S., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Brunet, P., ‘Aspects théoriques et philosophiques de l’interprétation normative’, (2011) 115 RGDIP 311.Google Scholar

Burke-White, W. W. & von Staden, A., ‘Private Litigation in a Public Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor–State Arbitrations’, (2010) 35 Yale JIL 283.Google Scholar

Cabrillac, R. (ed), Dictionnaire du vocabulaire juridique 2014 (5th edn, LexisNexis 2013).Google Scholar

Calabresi, S. & Zimdahl, S., ‘The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and The Juvenile Death Penalty Decision’, (2005) 47 William & Mary LR 743.Google Scholar

Caron, D., ‘The Interpretation of National Foreign Investment Law as Unilateral Acts under International Law’, in Arsanjani, M. H. et al. (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Martinus Nijhoff 2010).Google Scholar

Carozza, P. G., ‘“My Friend is a Stranger”: The Death Penalty and the Global Ius Commune of Human Rights’, (2003) 81 Texas LR 1031.Google Scholar

Carozza, P. G. ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’, (2003) 97 AJIL 38.Google Scholar

Carozza, P. G. ‘Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law in International Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, (1998) 73 Notre Dame Law Review 1217.Google Scholar

Cassese, A., ‘The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals’, (2012) 25 LJIL 491.Google Scholar

Cassese, A. International Law (2nd edn, OUP 2005).Google Scholar

Cassese, A. International Criminal Law (OUP 2003).Google Scholar

Cassese, A. et al., Cassese’s International Criminal Law (3rd edn, OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Chang, Y. -T., The Interpretation of Treaties by Judicial Tribunals (Columbia UP 1933).Google Scholar

Charlesworth, H. et al., ‘International Law and National Law: Fluid States’, in Charlesworth, H. et al. (eds), The Fluid State: International Law and National Legal Systems (The Federation Press 2005).Google Scholar

Chinkin, C., ‘Due Process and Witness Anonymity’, (1997) 99 AJIL 75.Google Scholar

Chinkin, C. ‘International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia: Amicus Curiae Brief on Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses, Submitted by Dean and Professor of Law Christine Chinkin’, (1996) 7 Criminal Law Forum 179.Google Scholar

Chow, P. Y. S., ‘Reservations as Unilateral Acts? Examining the ILC’s Approach to Reservations’, (2017) 66 ICLQ 335.Google Scholar

Chung, O., ‘The Lopsided International Investment Law Regime and Its Effect on the Future of Investor–State Arbitration’, (2007) 47 Virginia JIL 953.Google Scholar

Churchill, R., ‘Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Spain v. Canada)’, (1999) 12 LJIL 597.Google Scholar

Clark, I., Legitimacy in International Society (OUP 2005).Google Scholar

Clayton, R. & Tomlinson, H., The Law of Human Rights (OUP 2000).Google Scholar

Cohen, H. G. ‘Theorizing Precedent in International Law’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D. & Windsor, M. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Conforti, B., ‘Cours général de droit international public’, (1988) 212 Recueil des cours 9.Google Scholar

Cook, G., A Digest of WTO Jurisprudence on Public International Law Concepts and Principles (CUP 2015).Google Scholar

Corten, O., ‘Motif légitime et lien de causalité suffisant: un modèle d’interprétation rationnel du “raisonnable”’, (1998) Annuaire français de droit international 187.Google Scholar

Corten, O. & Klein, P. (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Cot, J. P., ‘La conduite subséquente des parties à un traité’, (1966) 70 RGDIP 633.Google Scholar

Cram, I., ‘Resort to Foreign Constitutional Norms in Domestic Human Rights Jurisprudence with Reference to Terrorism Cases’, (2009) 68 CLJ 118.Google Scholar

Crawford, J., ‘A Consensualist Interpretation of Article 31(3) of the Vienna Convention’, in Nolte, G. (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Crawford, J. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, OUP 2012).Google Scholar

Crema, L., ‘Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice Within and Outside the Vienna Convention’, in Nolte, G. (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

D’Amato, A., ‘Can Legislatures Constrain Judicial Interpretation of Statutes?’, (1989) 75 Virginia L Rev 561.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J., ‘The Multidimensional Process of Interpretation: Content-Determination and Law-Ascertainment Distinguished’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D. & Windsor, M. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Darcy, S., ‘The Principle of Legality at the Crossroads of Human Rights and International Criminal Law’, in deGuzman, M. M. & Amann, D. M. (eds), Arcs of Global Justice: Essays in Honour of William A. Schabas (OUP 2018).Google Scholar

David, R., Jauffret-Spinosi, C. & Goré, M. Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains (12th edn, Dalloz 2016).Google Scholar

de Aréchaga, J., ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’, (1978) 159 Recueil des cours 1.Google Scholar

de Londras, F. & Dzehtsiarou, K., ‘Managing Judicial Innovation in the European Court of Human Rights’, (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 523.Google Scholar

De Ly, F. et al., ‘Who Wins and Who Loses in Investment Arbitration? Are Investors and Host States on a Level Playing Field? The Lauder/Czech Republic Legacy’, (2005) 6 JWIT 59.Google Scholar

Desierto, D., Necessity and National Emergency Clauses: Sovereignty in Modern Treaty Interpretation (Martinus Nijhoff 2012).Google Scholar

Djeffal, C., Static and Evolutive Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction (CUP 2015).Google Scholar

Donnelly, J., ‘The Relative Universality of Human Rights’, (2007) 29 Human Rights Quarterly 281.Google Scholar

Dörr, O. & Schmalenbach, K. (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorsen, N., ‘The Relevance of Foreign Legal Materials in US Constitutional Cases: A Conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer’, (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 519.Google Scholar

Douglas, Z., ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, (2003) 54 BYIL 151.Google Scholar

Dowds, E., ‘Conceptualizing the Role of Consent in the Definition of Rape at the International Criminal Court: A Norm Transfer Perspective’, (2018) International Feminist Journal of Politics 1.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. -M., ‘The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited’, (1997) 1 Max Planck YB UN Law 1.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. -M. La responsabilité internationale des états pour les dommages d’origines technologique et industrielle (Pedone 1976).Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K., European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (CUP 2015).Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K. ‘Does Consensus Matter? Legitimacy of European Consensus in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, (2011) Public Law 534.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K. ‘Consensus from within the Palace Walls’, UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies, Research Paper No. 40/2010.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F., ‘Abstraction and Authority’, (1992) 59 University of Chicago LR 349.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H., ‘Foreign Sources and the American Constitution’, (2006) 30 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 223.Google Scholar

Eckhart, C., Promises of States Under International Law (Hart 2012).Google Scholar

Ehrlich, L., ‘L’interprétation des traités’, (1928) 24 Recueil des cours 5.Google Scholar

Ellis, J., ‘General Principles and Comparative Law’, (2011) 22 EJIL 949.Google Scholar

Elkins, Z. et al., ‘Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000’, (2006) 60 International Organization 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elsig, M., ‘The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis: What Does the Beast Look Like?’, (2007) 41 Journal of World Trade 75.Google Scholar

Eriksson, M., Defining Rape: Emerging Obligations for States under International Law (Martinus Nijhoff 2011).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ECHR: Overview 1959–2017 (Council of Europe 2017).Google Scholar

ECHR, ‘References to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights: Research Report’, (Council of Europe 2012).Google Scholar

Falk, R., ‘On Treaty Interpretation and the New Haven Approach: Achievements and Prospects’, (1967–8) 8 Virginia JIL 323.Google Scholar

Fartache, M., ‘De la competence de la cour international de justice dans l’affaire de l’Anglo-Iranien Oil Co.’, (1953) 57 RGDIP 584.Google Scholar

Fatima, S., Using International Law in Domestic Courts (Hart 2005).Google Scholar

Fauchald, O. K. & Nollkaemper, A., ‘Introduction’, in Fauchald, O. K. & Nollkaemper, A. (eds), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Hart 2012).Google Scholar

Feliciano, F. P., ‘The Anglo-Iranian Oil Dispute’, (1951) 26 Philippine LJ 55.Google Scholar

Fiori, M., ‘The Foca “Rape Camps”: A Dark Page Read through the ICTY’s Jurisprudence’, (2007) 2[3] Hague Justice Journal 9, www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/HJJ-JJH/Vol_2%283%29/The%20Foca_Fiori_EN.pdf. Archived at www.webcitation.org/6SQvJhsUY.Google Scholar

Fish, S., ‘Intention Is All There Is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s Purposive Interpretation in Law’, (2008) 29(3) Cardozo L Rev 1109.Google Scholar

Fish, S. ‘Fish v. Fiss’, (1984) 36 Stanford LR 1325.Google Scholar

Fish, S. Is There a Text in This Class? (Harvard UP 1980).Google Scholar

Fiss, O., ‘Objectivity and Interpretation’, (1982) 34 Stanford LR 739.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘Vae Victis or Woe to the Negotiators! Your Treaty or Our “Interpretation” of It?’, (1971) 65 AJIL 358.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–4: Questions of Jurisdiction, Competence and Procedure’, (1958) 34 BYIL 1.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’, (1957) 92 Recueil des cours 1.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’, (1957) 33 BYIL 203.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. ‘De l’interprétation des traités’, (1956) 46 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 317.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. ‘Délibérations: interprétation des traites’, (1952) 44[2] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 372.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation and Certain Other Treaty Points’, (1951) 28 BYIL 1.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. & Vallat, F. A., ‘Sir (William) Eric Beckett, KCMG, QC (1896–1966): An Appreciation’, (1968) 17 ICLQ 267.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘The Optional Clause System and the Law of Treaties’, (1999) 20 Australian YBIL 127.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M. & Flinterman, C. (eds), Interactions between International and Municipal Law: A Comparative Law Case Study (TMC Asser 1993).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M. et al. (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Martinus Nijhoff 2010).Google Scholar

Flanagan, B. & Ahern, S., ‘Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law: A Survey of Common Law Supreme Court Judges’, (2011) 60 ICLQ 1.Google Scholar

Franck, T. M., ‘Is the UN Charter a Constitution?’ in Frowein, J. A. et al., Verhandeln für den Frienden/Negotiating for Peace (Springer 2003).Google Scholar

Franck, T. M. ‘Word Made Law: The Decision of the International Court of Justice in the Nuclear Test Cases’, (1975) 69 AJIL 612.Google Scholar

Friedmann, W., ‘The Use of “General Principles” in the Development of International Law’, (1963) 57 AJIL 279.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. L., The Morality of Law (Revised edn, Yale UP 1969).Google Scholar

Fuller, L. L., ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart’, (1958) 71 Harvard LR 630.Google Scholar

Gaja, G., ‘Loi (national): un simple fait’, in Ascencio, H. et al. (eds), Dictionnaire des idées reçues en droit international (Pedone 2017).Google Scholar

Gallant, K. S., The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Law (CUP 2009).Google Scholar

Galmot, Y., ‘Réflexions sur le recours au droit comparé par la Cour de justice des Communautés éuropéennes’, (1990) 6 Revue française de droit administratif 255.Google Scholar

Gardiner, R., Treaty Interpretation (2nd edn, OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Gelter, M. & Siems, M., ‘Citations to Foreign Courts – Illegitimate and Superfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidence from Europe’, (2014) 62 American Journal of Comparative Law 35.Google Scholar

Gelter, M. & Siems, M. ‘Language, Legal Origins, and Culture before the Courts: Cross-Citations Between Supreme Courts in Europe’, (2013) 21 Supreme Court Economic Review 215.Google Scholar

Gelter, M. & Siems, M. ‘Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts’, (2012) 8 Utrecht LR 88.Google Scholar

Gentili, A., De Jure Belli Libri Tres (Trans J. C. Rolfe, OUP 1933).Google Scholar

Gény, F., Méthode d’interprétation et sources en droit privé positif (2nd edn, LGDJ 1919).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T., ‘International Judicial Lawmaking’, University of Illinois College of Law, Illinois Law and Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper No. LE05-006.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. L. & Posner, E. A., The Limits of International Law (OUP 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, R. & Jinks, D., ‘How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law’, (2004) 54 Duke LJ 621.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G., ‘The Conceptual World of the Yale School of International Law’, (1968) 21 World Politics 108.Google Scholar

Grotius, H., De iure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres (trans A. C. Campbell, Batoche 2001).Google Scholar

Grover, L., Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (CUP 2014).Google Scholar

Guerra-Pujol, F. E., ‘Probabilistic Reasoning’, (2016) 38 University of La Verne LR 102.Google Scholar

Guinchard, S. (ed), Lexique des termes juridiques (20th edn, Dalloz 2012).Google Scholar

Hackworth, G. H., Digest of International Law (US Government Printing Office 1943).Google Scholar

Halpin, A., Reasoning With Law (Hart 2001).Google Scholar

Harbour, G., ‘International Concern Regarding Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in the Lead-up to the ICTY’s Establishment’, in Brammertz, S. & Jarvis, M. (eds), Prosecuting Conflict-Related Sexual Violence at the ICTY (OUP 2016).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (3rd edn, OUP 2012).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Clarendon Press 1983).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, (1958) 71 Harvard LR 593.Google Scholar

Hart, H. M. & Sacks, A., The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (Foundation Press 1994).Google Scholar

Harvard Research in International Law, ‘Harvard Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’, (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 653.Google Scholar

Hathaway, O. A. & Lavinbuk, A. N., ‘Rationalism and Revisionism in International Law’, (2006) 119 Harvard LR 1404.Google Scholar

Hayes, N., ‘Creating a Definition of Rape in International Law: The Contribution of the International Criminal Tribunals’ in Darcy, S. & Powderly, J. (eds), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunal (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R., ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, (2008) 19 EJIL 125.Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R. & Voeten, E., ‘International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe’, (2014) 68 International Organization 77.Google Scholar

Henkin, L., ‘The Universality of the Concept of Human Rights’, (1989) 506 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 10.Google Scholar

Henrard, K. & Mak, E., ‘The Use of Consensus Arguments in Transnational Decision-Making: Confirming or Jeopardizing Human Rights’, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2444682.Google Scholar

Hernández, G., ‘Interpretation’ in Kammerhofer, J. & d’Aspremont, J. (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (CUP 2014).Google Scholar

Hernández, G. ‘Interpretative Authority and the International Judiciary’, in Bianchi, A. et al. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Clarendon Press 1994).Google Scholar

Hoda, A., Tariff Negotiations and Renegotiations Under the GATT and the WTO: Procedures and Practices (CUP 2001).Google Scholar

Hoekman, B. M. & Kostecki, M. M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (OUP 2009).Google Scholar

Hollis, D., ‘The Existential Function of Interpretation in International Law’, in Bianchi, A. et al. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Horn, H. & Howse, R., ‘European Communities – Customs Classification of Frozen Boneless Chicken Cuts’ in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. (eds), The WTO Case Law of 2004–2005 (CUP 2008).Google Scholar

Howse, R., ‘Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence’ in Weiler, J. H. H. (ed), The EU, the WTO and NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? (OUP 2001).Google Scholar

Hudson, M. O., The Permanent Court of International Justice (Macmillan 1934).Google Scholar

Independent International Commission on Kosovo, The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned (OUP 2000).Google Scholar

Institut de Droit international, ‘De l’interprétation des traités’, (1956) 46 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 349.Google Scholar

Jackson, V., ‘Constitutional Law and Transnational Comparisons: The Youngstown Decision and American Exceptionalism’, (2006) 30 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 191.Google Scholar

Jackson, V., ‘Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement’, (2005) 119 Harvard LR 109.Google Scholar

Jacobs, D., ‘International Criminal Law’, in Kammerhofer, J. & D’Aspremont, J. (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (CUP 2014).Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G., ‘Varieties of Approach to Treaty Interpretation’, (1969) 18 ICLQ 318.Google Scholar

Jain, N., ‘Judicial Lawmaking and General Principles of Law in International Criminal Law’, (2016) 57 Harvard Intl L J 111.Google Scholar

Jain, N., ‘Comparative International Law at the ICTY: The General Principles Experiment’, (2015) 109 AJIL 486.Google Scholar

Jeffries, J. C., ‘Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes’, (1985) 71 Virginia LR 189.Google Scholar

Jennings, R. & Watts, A., Oppenheim’s International Law, vol 1 (9th edn, OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Jessup, J., ‘Observations of Judge Philip Jessup’, (1985) 61 [I] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 252.Google Scholar

Johnstone, I., ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities’, (1990) 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 371.Google Scholar

Jones, J. R. W. D. & Powles, S., International Criminal Practice (3rd edn, OUP 2003).Google Scholar

Kakouris, C. K., ‘Use of the Comparative Method by the Court of Justice of the European Communities’, (1994) Pace International Law Review 282.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J., ‘Taking the Rules of Interpretation Seriously, but Not Literally? A Theoretical Reconstruction of Orthodox Dogma’, (2017) 86 Nordic JIL 125.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J., ‘Review of Alexander Orakhelashvili, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law’, (2009) 20 EJIL 1282.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Pure Theory of Law (2nd edn, University of California Press 1967).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State (Russell & Russell 1961).Google Scholar

The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of its Fundamental Problems (Stevens & Sons 1950).Google Scholar

Law and Peace in International Relations (Harvard UP 1942).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’, (1976) 89 Harvard LR 1685.Google Scholar

Ketcheson, J., The Application of Domestic Law by International Tribunals (PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge 2013).Google Scholar

Khan, K. A. A. et al., Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Kiikeri, M., Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law (Springer 2001).Google Scholar

Killander, M., ‘African Human Rights Law in Theory and Practice’, in Joseph, S. & McBeth, A. (eds), Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law (Edward Elgar 2010).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. & Stewart, R. B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, (2005) 68 Law & Contemporary Problems 15.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., International Law (CUP 2013).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. ‘Virtuous Interpretation’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Elias, O. & Merkouris, P. (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Martinus Nijhoff 2010).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. ‘On Rationalism in Politics: Interpretation of Treaties and the World Trade Organization’, (2005) 74 Nordic Journal of International Law 405.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. ‘International Legal Histories: The Declining Importance of the Travaux Préparatoires in Treaty Interpretation?’, (2003) 50 NILR 267.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. et al., The Constitutionalization of International Law (OUP 2009).Google Scholar

Kläger, R., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (CUP 2011).Google Scholar

Kläger, R. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’, (2010) 11 JWIT 435.Google Scholar

Klamberg, M., Evidence in International Criminal Trials: Confronting Gaps and Reconstruction of Disputed Events (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar

Knop, K., ‘Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts’, (2000) NYU JILP 501.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H., ‘The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing International Law Home’, (1998) 35 Houston International Law Journal 623.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. ‘Why do Nations Obey International Law? Review of The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements by A. Chayes and A. Handler Chayes, and of Fairness in International Law and Institutions by T. M. Franck’, (1997) 106 Yale LJ 2599.Google Scholar

Koh, H. H. ‘“Transnational Legal Process” – The 1994 Roscoe Pound Lecture’, (1996) 75 Nebraska LR 181.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., The International Court of Justice (Hart 2013).Google Scholar

Kolb, R., Interprétation et création du droit international (Bruylant 2006).Google Scholar

Kolb, R. La bonne foi (Presses Universitaires de France 2000).Google Scholar

Korhonen, O., ‘New International Law: Silence, Defence or Deliverance’, (1996) 7 EJIL 1.Google Scholar

Korobkin, R. B., ‘Behavioral Analysis and Legal Form: Rules vs. Standards Revisited’, (2000) 79 Oregon L Rev 23.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Reissue with New Epilogue, CUP 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. ‘The Case for Comparative International Law’, (2009) 20 Finnish YBIL 1.Google Scholar

Kraus, H., ‘Réponse de H. Kraus’, (1950) 43[I] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 446.Google Scholar

Krisch, N., ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods’, (2014) 108 AJIL 1.Google Scholar

Krisch, N. ‘Review of Jutta Brunnée and Stephen Toope, Legality and Legitimacy in International Law: An Interactional Account’, (2012) 106 AJIL 203.Google Scholar

Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, B., ‘Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada)’, (1999) 93 AJIL 502.Google Scholar

Lamm, V., Compulsory Jurisdiction in International Law (Edward Elgar 2014).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, E., The Life of Hersch Lauterpacht (CUP 2010).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘De l’interprétation des traités’, (1954) 45[1] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 225.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. ‘Observations complémentaires et projet définitif de Résolutions’, (1952) 44[I] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 197.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘De l’interprétation des traites’, (1950) 43[1] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 367.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. ‘Remarques complémentaires du rapporteur, M. Lauterpacht’, (1950) 43[I] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 457.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’, (1949) 26 BYIL 48.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. ‘Some Observations on Preparatory Work in Treaty Interpretation’, (1935) 48 Harvard LR 549.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (With Special Reference to International Arbitration) (Longmans, Green & Co. 1927).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. Private Law Analogies in International Law with Special Reference to International Arbitration (LLD London School of Economics 1926).Google Scholar

le Bouthillier, Y., ‘Article 32’, in Corten, O. & Klein, P. (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Legrand, P., ‘What “Legal Transplants?”’ in Nelken, D. & Feest, J. (eds), Adapting Legal Culture (Hart 2001).Google Scholar

Leigh, M., ‘Witness Anonymity Is Inconsistent with Due Process’, (1997) 99 AJIL 80.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K., ‘Interlocking Legal Orders or the European Union Variant of E Pluribus Unum’ in Canivet, G. et al. (eds), Comparative Law Before the Courts (BIICL 2005).Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K. & Gutman, K., ‘The Comparative Law Method and the Court of Justice of the European Union: Interlocking Legal Orders Revisited’, in Andenas, M. & Fairgrieve, D. (eds), Courts and Comparative Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Letsas, G. ‘Intentionalism and the Interpretation of the ECHR’, in Fitzmaurice, M. et al., Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Brill 2010).Google Scholar

Letsas, G. ‘Strasbourg’s Interpretative Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer’, (2010) 21 EJIL 509.Google Scholar

Letsas, G., A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (OUP 2007).Google Scholar

Lefebvre, A., ‘Hart, Wittgenstein, Jurisprudence’, (2011) 154 Telos 99.Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U., ‘Is Treaty Interpretation an Art or a Science’, (2015) 26[1] EJIL 169.Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U. On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Springer 2007).Google Scholar

Linos, K., The Democratic Foundations of Policy Diffusion: How Health, Family, and Employment Laws Spread Across Countries (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Lowe, V., ‘The Politics of Law-Making: Are the Method and Character of Norm Creation Changing?’, in Byers, M. (ed), The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law (OUP 2001).Google Scholar

MacCormick, D. N. & Summers, R. S., ‘Interpretation and Justification’, in MacCormick, D. N. & Summers, R. S. (eds), Interpreting Statutes (Dartmouth Publishing 1991).Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., Rhetoric and the Rule of Law (OUP 2005).Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘The Relationship between the Strasbourg Court and the National Courts’, (2014) 130 LQR 568.Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘The Comparative Method in Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: Reference Back to National Law’, in Canivet, G. et al. (eds), Comparative Law before the Courts (BIICL 2005).Google Scholar

Mahoney, P. ‘Universality versus Subsidiarity in the Strasbourg Case Law on Free Speech: Explaining Some Recent Judgments’, (1997) 4 European Human Rights Law Review 364.Google Scholar

Mahoney, P. & Kondak, R., ‘Common Ground: A Starting Point or Destination for Comparative-Law Analysis by the European Court of Human Rights’, in Andenas, M. & Fairgrieve, D. (eds), Courts and Comparative Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Mak, E., Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World (Hart 2013).Google Scholar

Markesinis, B., ‘National Self-Sufficiency or Intellectual Arrogance? The Current Attitude of American Courts towards Foreign Law’, (2006) 65 CLJ 301.Google Scholar

Markesinis, B. & Fedtke, J., Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law: A New Source of Inspiration? (UCL Press 2006).Google Scholar

Marmor, A., Social Conventions: From Language to Law (Princeton UP 2014).Google Scholar

Marmor, A. The Philosophy of Law (Princeton UP 2011).Google Scholar

Marmor, A., Interpretation and Legal Theory (2nd edn, Hart 2005).Google Scholar

Martens, P., ‘Perplexity of the National Judge Faced with Vagaries of European Consensus’, in European Court of Human Rights, Dialogue between judges (Council of Europe 2008).Google Scholar

Mattli, W., ‘Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration’, (2001) 55 International Organization 919.Google Scholar

Maupin, J., ‘Public and Private in International Investment Law: An Integrated Systems Approach’, (2014) 54 VJIL 367.Google Scholar

Mavronicola, N., ‘What is an Absolute Right? Deciphering the Absoluteness in the Context of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, (2012) 12[4] Human Rights Law Review 723.Google Scholar

McCrudden, C., ‘CEDAW in National Courts: A Case Study in Operationalizing Comparative International Law Analysis in a Human Rights Context’, in Roberts, A. et al. (eds), Comparative International Law (OUP 2018).Google Scholar

McDonald, G. K., ‘Problems, Obstacles and Achievements of the ICTY’, (2004) 2 JICJ 558.Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S. et al., The Interpretation of International Agreements and World Public Order: Principles of Content and Procedure (Yale UP 1967).Google Scholar

McDougal, M., ‘The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles upon Interpretation: Textuality Redividus’, (1967) 61 AJIL 992.Google Scholar

McGrady, B., ‘Fragmentation of International Law or “Systemic Integration” of Treaty Regimes: EC–Biotech Products and the Proper Interpretation of Article31 (3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’, (2008) 43 Journal of World Trade 589.Google Scholar

McLachlan, C., ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’, (2005) 54 ICLQ 279.Google Scholar

McLachlan, C. et al., International Investment Law: Substantive Principles (2nd edn, OUP 2017).Google Scholar

McNair, A. D., ‘Observations de Sir Arnold D. McNair’, (1950) 43[I] Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 449.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Beyond “Fairness”: Understanding Determinants of International Criminal Procedure’, (2009) 14 UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 37.Google Scholar

Mehrish, B. N., ‘The Role of Travaux Préparatoires as an Element in the Interpretation of Treaties’, (1970) 40 Yearbook of the Association of Attenders and Alumni of The Hague Academy of International Law 43.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘Remarks on the Principle of Legality in International Criminal Law’, (2009) ASIL Proc 107.Google Scholar

Meron, T. War Crimes Law Comes of Age (OUP 1999).Google Scholar

Meron, T., Henry’s Wars and Shakespeare’s Laws: Perspectives on the Law of War in the Later Middle Ages (OUP 1993).Google Scholar

Meron, T. ‘Rape as a Crime under International Humanitarian Law’, (1993) 87 AJIL 424.Google Scholar

Merrills, J. G., ‘Two Approaches to Treaty Interpretation’, (1969) 4 Australian YBIL 55.Google Scholar

Mettraux, G., International Crimes and the ad hoc Tribunals (OUP 2005).Google Scholar

Mitchell, A. D., Legal Principles in WTO Disputes (CUP 2008).Google Scholar

Moglen, E. & Pierce, R., ‘Sunstein’s New Canons: Choosing the Fictions of Statutory Interpretation’, (1990) 57 University of Chicago LR 1203.Google Scholar

Mokhtar, A., ‘Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege: Aspects and Prospects’, (2005) 26 Statute LR 41.Google Scholar

Montt, S., State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation (Hart 2012).Google Scholar

Moremen, P. M., ‘National Courts Decisions as State Practice: A Transjudicial Dialogue?’, (2006) 32 North Carolina JIL 259.Google Scholar

Morris, V. & Scharf, M. P., The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (Transnational Publishers 1998).Google Scholar

Morris, V. & Scharf, M. P., An Insider’s Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (Transnational Publishers 1995).Google Scholar

Mortenson, J. D., ‘The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History?’, (2013) 107[4] AJIL 780.Google Scholar

Mowbray, A., ‘Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights’, (2015) Human Rights LR 313.Google Scholar

Mumba, F., ‘Ensuring a Fair Trial whilst Protecting Victims and Witnesses – Balancing of Interests?’ in May, R. et al. (eds), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence: In Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (Kluwer Law International 2001).Google Scholar

Murray, J. L., ‘Consensus: Concordance, or Hegemony of the Majority?’ in European Court of Human Rights, Dialogue between judges (Council of Europe 2008).Google Scholar

Neuman, G. L., ‘The Uses of International Law in Constitutional Interpretation’, (2004) 98 AJIL 82.Google Scholar

Neven, D. J. & Mavroidis, P. C., ‘Mexico–Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services (WT/DS204/R: DSR 2004:IV, 1537): A Comment on “El mess in TELMEX”’ in Horn, H. & Mavroidis, P. C. (eds), The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law: Legal and Economic Analysis (CUP 2007).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A., ‘Conversations Amongst Courts: Domestic and International Adjudicators’, in Romano, C. P. R. et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A. National Courts and the International Rule of Law (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

‘The Independence of the Domestic Judiciary in International Law’, (2006) 17 Finnish YBIL 261.Google Scholar

‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice’, (2006) 5 Chinese JIL 301.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A. ‘Decisions of National Courts as Sources of International Law: An Analysis of the Practice of the ICTY’, in Boas, G. & Schabas, W. (eds), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY (Martinus Nijhoff 2003).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A. & Fauchald, O. K. (eds), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Hart 2012).Google Scholar

Nolte, G. (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Nordeide, R., ‘Demir & Baykara v. Turkey’, (2009) 103 AJIL 567.Google Scholar

Oosterveld, V., ‘Legal Traditions and International Criminal Gender Jurisprudence’, (2013) 2[4] CJICL 825.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A., The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Ortino, F., ‘Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US–Gambling: A Critique’, (2006) 9 JIEL 1.Google Scholar

Örücü, E., ‘The Courts and the Legislator’ in Örücü, E. & Nelken, D. (eds), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Hart 2007).Google Scholar

Pahuja, S. & Storr, C., ‘Rethinking Iran and International Law: The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company Case Revisited’, in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The International Legal Order: Current Needs and Possible Responses (Brill 2017).Google Scholar

Paparinskis, M., ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’, in Douglas, Z. et al. (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (OUP 2014).Google Scholar

Paparinskis, M. The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (OUP 2013).Google Scholar

Pargendler, M., ‘The Rise and Decline of Legal Families’, (2012) 60 American J Comp L 1043.Google Scholar

Parlett, K., The Individual in the International Legal System (CUP 2011).Google Scholar

Patterson, D., ‘Interpretation in Law’, (2005) 42 San Diego LR 685.Google Scholar

Patterson, D. ‘Law’s Pragmatism: Law as Practice and Narrative’, (1990) 76 Virginia LR 937.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., Conflict of Norms in Public International Law (CUP 2003).Google Scholar

Peat, D. & Windsor, M., ‘Playing the Game of Interpretation: On Meaning and Metaphor in International Law’, in Bianchi, A. et al. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Pillay, N., ‘Equal Justice for Women: A Personal Journey’, (2008) 50 Arizona LR 657.Google Scholar

Posner, E. & Sunstein, C., ‘The Law of Other States’, (2006) 59 Stanford LR 131.Google Scholar

Posner, R., ‘No Thanks, We Already Have Our Own Laws’, (2004) Legal Affairs (July–August), www.legalaffairs.org/issues/July-August-2004/feature_posner_julaug04.msp.Google Scholar

Posner, R. A., ‘The Supreme Court 2004 Term – Foreword: A Political Court’, (2005) 119 Harvard LR 32.Google Scholar

Postema, G., ‘Positivism and the Separation of Realists from Their Scepticism’ in Cane, P. (ed), The Hart–Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century (Hart 2010).Google Scholar

Postema, G., ‘Conformity, Custom and Congruence’ in Kramer, M. (ed), The Legacy of H. L. A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy (OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Postema, G. ‘Implicit Law’, (1994) 13 Law and Philosophy 361.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, S., Of the Law of Nature and Nations (trans B. Kennett, 1719).Google Scholar

Radi, Y., La standardisation et le droit international: Contours d’une théorie dialectique de la formation du droit (Bruylant 2013).Google Scholar

Raimondo, F. O., ‘General Principles of Law, Judicial Creativity, and the Development of International Criminal Law’, in Darcy, S. & Powderly, J. (eds), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Raimondo, F. O., General Principles of Law in the Decisions of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals (Martinus Nijhoff 2008).Google Scholar

Rainey, B. et al., The European Convention on Human Rights (6th edn, OUP 2014).Google Scholar

Ramsey, M. D., ‘International Materials and Domestic Rights’, (2004) 98 AJIL 69.Google Scholar

Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (OUP 1988).Google Scholar

Raz, J., The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (OUP 1979).Google Scholar

Roberts, A., Is International Law International? (OUP 2017).Google Scholar

Roberts, A., ‘Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System’, (2013) 107 AJIL 45.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, (2011) 60 ICLQ 57.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. et al., ‘Conceptualizing Comparative International Law’, in Roberts, A. et al. (eds), Comparative International Law (OUP 2018).Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘Conceptualism as a Guide to Interpretation’, in Rosenne, S., An International Law Miscellany (Martinus Nijhoff 1993).Google Scholar

Rosenne, S. ‘Interpretation of Treaties in the Restatement and the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles: A Comparison’, (1966) 5 Columbia J Transnational L 205.Google Scholar

Roy, B., ‘An Empirical Survey of Foreign Jurisprudence and International Instruments in Charter Litigation’, (2004) 62 University of Toronto Faculty Law Review 99.Google Scholar

Rubenfeld, J., ‘Unilateralism and Constitutionalism’, (2004) 79 NYU LR 1971.Google Scholar

Rubin, A. P., ‘An International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia?’, (1994) 6 Pace International Law Review 7.Google Scholar

Rubin, A. P. ‘The International Legal Effects of Unilateral Declarations’, (1977) 71 AJIL 1.Google Scholar

Sathanapally, A., Beyond Disagreement: Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication (OUP 2012).Google Scholar

Scalia, A., A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton UP 1998).Google Scholar

Schabas, W., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (4th edn, CUP 2011).Google Scholar

Schabas, W. The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone (CUP 2006).Google Scholar

Schabas, W. ‘Interpreting the Statutes of the ad hoc Tribunals’ in Vohrah, L. C. et al. (eds), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Kluwer Law International 2003).Google Scholar

Schauer, F., ‘The Tyranny of Choice and the Rulification of Standards’, (2005) 14 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 803.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. ‘The Convergence of Rules and Standards’, (2003) NZLR 303.Google Scholar

Schauer, F. ‘The Politics and Incentives of Legal Transplantation’, Center for International Development at Harvard University Working Paper No. 44 (2000).Google Scholar

Schauer, F., ‘Formalism’, (1988) 97 Yale LJ 509.Google Scholar

Schermers, H., ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in Effectuating International Law’, (1990) 3 LJIL 77.Google Scholar

Schill, S. W., ‘Sources of International Investment Law: Multilateralization, Arbitral Precedent, Comparativism, Soft Law’, in Besson, S. & d’Aspremont, J. (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of Law (2017).Google Scholar

Schill, S. W. ‘Editorial: Towards a Normative Framework for Investment Law Reform’, (2014) 15 JWIT 795.Google Scholar

Schill, S. W. ‘The Sixth Path: Reforming Investment Law from Within’, (2014) 11 Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar

Schill, S. W. ‘Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Reconceptualising the Standard of Review’, (2012) 3 JIDS 577.Google Scholar

Schill, S. W. ‘International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law – An Introduction’, in Schill, S. W. (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Schlag, P., ‘No Vehicles in the Park’, (1999) 23 Seattle University LR 381.Google Scholar

Schlag, P., ‘Fish v. Zapp: The Case of the Relatively Autonomous Self’, (1987) 76 Georgetown LJ 37.Google Scholar

Schlag, P. ‘Rules and Standards’, (1985) 22 UCLA LR 379.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, D., Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise (CUP 2008).Google Scholar

Schreuer, C., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’, (2005) 6 Journal of World Trade 357.Google Scholar

Senden, H., Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Intersentia 2011).Google Scholar

Shahabuddeen, M., ‘Municipal Law Reasoning in International Law’, in Lowe, V. & Fitzmaurice, M. (eds), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (CUP 1996).Google Scholar

Shaw, M., Rosenne’s Law and Practice of the International Court: 1920–2015 (5th edn, Brill 2016).Google Scholar

Siems, M., ‘The Methods of Comparative Corporate Law’, in Tomasic, R. (ed), Routledge Handbook of Corporate Law (Routledge 2016).Google Scholar

Siems, M., Comparative Law (CUP 2014).Google Scholar

Simmonds, N. E., ‘Between Positivism and Idealism’, (1991) 50 CLJ 308.Google Scholar

Sinclair, I., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, Manchester UP 1984).Google Scholar

Sitaraman, G., ‘The Use and Abuse of Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation’, (2009) 32 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 653.Google Scholar

Slaughter, A. -M., A New World Order (Princeton UP 2004).Google Scholar

Slaughter, A. -M., ‘A Global Community of Courts’, (2003) 44 Harvard International Law Journal 191.Google Scholar

Sloss, D. (ed), The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (CUP 2010).Google Scholar

Sluiter, G., ‘Procedural Lawmaking at the International Criminal Tribunals’ in Darcy, S. & Powderly, J. (eds), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals (OUP 2010).Google Scholar

Solum, L., ‘The Unity of Interpretation’, (2010) 90 Boston University LR 551.Google Scholar

Sorel, J. -M. & Boré Eveno, V., ‘Article 31’ in Corten, O. & Klein, P. (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (OUP 2011).Google Scholar

Spano, R., ‘Universality or Diversity of Human Rights?’, (2014) 14 Human Rights Law Review 487.Google Scholar

St. John MacDonald, R., ‘The Margin of Appreciation’, St. John MacDonald, R. et al. (eds), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff 1993).Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A. & Keller, H., ‘The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Orders’, in Stone-Sweet, A. & Keller, H. (eds), A Europe System of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A. & della Cananea, G., ‘Proportionality, General Principles of Law, and Investor–State Arbitration: A Response to José Alvarez’, (2014) 46 NYU J Intl L & Pol 911.Google Scholar

Stone, J., ‘Fictional Elements in Treaty Interpretation – A Study in the International Judicial Process’, (1955) 1[3] Sydney Law Review 344.Google Scholar

Sullivan, K. M., ‘The Supreme Court 1991 Term, Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards’, (1992) 106 Harvard LR 22.Google Scholar

Sutton, J. S., ‘The Role of History in Judging Disputes about the Meaning of the Constitution’, (2009) 41 Texas Tech LR 1173.Google Scholar

Suy, E., Les actes juridiques unilatéraux en droit international public (LGDJ 1962).Google Scholar

Suy, E. ‘Unilateral Acts of States as a Source of International Law: Some New Thoughts and Frustrations’, in Angelet, N. (ed), Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit: Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon (Bruylant 2007).Google Scholar

Swaak-Goldman, O. Q., ‘The ICTY and the Right to a Fair Trial: A Critique of the Critics’, (1997) 10 LJIL 215.Google Scholar

Swart, M., ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the ad hoc Tribunals: The Creative Use of the Sources of International Law and “Adventurous Interpretation”’, (2010) 70 ZaöRV 459.Google Scholar

Swart, M., Judges and Lawmaking at the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda (PhD Thesis, Leiden University 2006), https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/5434/Thesis.pdf?sequence=1. Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20151017144933/Google Scholar

Thirlway, H., The International Court of Justice (OUP 2016).Google Scholar

Thirlway, H. ‘The Sources of International Law’, in Evans, M. D. (ed), International Law (4th edn, OUP 2014).Google Scholar

Thirlway, H. The Sources of International Law (OUP 2014).Google Scholar

Thirlway, H., ‘Concepts, Principles, Rules and Analogies: International and Municipal Legal Reasoning’, (2002) 294 Recueil des cours 265.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Article 36’, in Zimmerman, A. et al. (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd edn, OUP 2012).Google Scholar

Törbar, G., The Contractual Nature of the Optional Clause (Hart 2015).Google Scholar

Tudor, I., The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (OUP 2008).Google Scholar

Tutt, A., ‘Interpretation Step Zero: A Limit on Methodology as “Law”’, (2013) 122 Yale LJ 2055.Google Scholar

Twining, W. & Miers, D., How to do Things with Rules (5th edn, CUP 2010).Google Scholar

Twiss, T., The Black Book of the Admiralty (Longman 1871).Google Scholar

Ulfstein, G., ‘Interpretation of the ECHR in light of other international instruments’, Pluricourts Research Paper No. 15–05.Google Scholar

Vadi, V., Analogies in International Investment Arbitration (CUP 2016).Google Scholar

Vagts, D. F., ‘Treaty Interpretation and the New American Ways of Law Reading’, (1993) 4 EJIL 472.Google Scholar

Van Damme, I., ‘The Interpretation of Schedules of Commitments’, (2007) 41[1] Journal of World Trade 1.Google Scholar

Van Damme, I. Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (OUP 2009).Google Scholar

van den Herik, L., Presentation at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law Seminar ‘Interpretation in International Law’, 14 May 2015, www.biicl.org/documents/715_report_tgc_interpretation_in_international_law_140515.pdf. Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/Google Scholar

van der Wilt, H., ‘Commentary’, in Klip, A. & Sluiter, G. (eds), Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals vol 1 (Hart 1999).Google Scholar

Van Harten, G., ‘Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetical Adjudication (Part Two): An Examination of Hypotheses of Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, (2016) 53 Osgoode Hall LJ 540.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (CUP 2008).Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. & Loughlin, M., ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’, (2006) 17 EJIL 121.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B., ‘Crimen Sine Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals’, (2008) Georgetown LJ 119.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B. ‘The Principle of Legality in International Criminal Law’, (2009) 103 Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 101.Google Scholar

Vattel, E., The Law of Nations (trans anon., Liberty Fund 2008).Google Scholar

Venzke, I., How Interpretation Makes International Law (OUP 2012).Google Scholar

Verhoeven, J., Droit International Public (Larcier 2000).Google Scholar

Villiger, M., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A. & Venzke, I. (eds), In Whose Name?: A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (OUP 2014).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A. et al., ‘From Public International to International Public Law: Translating World Public Opinion into International Public Authority’, (2017) 28 EJIL 2017.Google Scholar

Wählisch, M., ‘Cognitive Frames of Interpretation in International Law’, in Bianchi, A. et al. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Wälde, T. & Kolo, A., ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and “Regulatory Taking” in International Law’, (2001) 50 ICLQ 811.Google Scholar

Waibel, M., ‘Interpretive Communities in International Law’, in Bianchi, A. et al. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Waibel, M., ‘Demystifying the Art of Interpretation’, (2011) 22 EJIL 571.Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘Partly Laws Common to All Mankind’: Foreign Law in American Courts (Yale UP 2012).Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium’, (2005) 119 Harvard LR 129.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure’, NYU School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 10–73.Google Scholar

Waldock, H., ‘Decline of the Optional Clause’, (1955–6) 32 BYIL 244.Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., ‘The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy’, (2004) 64 ZaöRV 547.Google Scholar

Weiner, P., ‘The Evolving Jurisprudence of the Crime of Rape in International Criminal Law’, (2013) 54[3] Boston College LR 1207.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, L. et al., ‘No Consensus on Consensus? The Practice of the European Court of Human Rights’, (2013) 33 Human Rights LJ 248.Google Scholar

Wisdom, J., ‘Gods’, (1945) 45 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 185.Google Scholar

Wood, M., ‘“Constitutionalization” of International Law: A Sceptical Voice’, in Kaikobad, K. H. & Bohlander, M. (eds), International Law and Power: Perspectives on Legal Order and Justice (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).Google Scholar

Wood, M. ‘The Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions’, (1998) 2 Max Planck Yearbook of UN Law 73.Google Scholar

Wroblewski, J., ‘Statutory Interpretation in Poland’, in MacCormick, D. N. & Summers, R. S. (eds), Interpreting Statutes (Dartmouth Publishing 1991).Google Scholar

Wuerth, I. B., ‘Sources of International Law in Domestic Law’, in d’Aspremont, J. & Besson, S. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (OUP 2017).Google Scholar

Yanovich, A. & Zdouc, W., ‘Procedural and Evidentiary Issues’, in Bethlehem, D. et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (OUP 2009).Google Scholar

Young, E. A., ‘Foreign Law and the Denominator Problem’, (2005) 119 Harvard LR 148.Google Scholar

Yu, T. C., The Interpretation of Treaties (Columbia UP 1927).Google Scholar

Zakaria, F., ‘The Rise of Illiberal Democracy’, (1999) 76 Foreign Affairs 22.Google Scholar

Zarbiyev, F., ‘A Genealogy of Textualism in Treaty Interpretation’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D. & Windsor, M. (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015).Google Scholar

Zarbiyev, F. Le discours interprétatif en droit international contemporain (Bruylant 2015).Google Scholar

Zwart, T., ‘More Human Rights than Court: Why the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights Is in Need of Repair and How It Can Be Done’ in Flogaitis, S. et al. (eds), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents (Edward Elgar 2013).Google Scholar

Zweigert, K. & Kötz, H., An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd edn, OUP 1998).Google Scholar