Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- LECTURES ON SHAKESPEARE
- Lectures on Shakespeare 1811–1812
- Lectures on Shakespeare 1818–1819
- Lecture 1 Thursday, 17 December 1818 (The Tempest)
- Lecture 3 Thursday, 7 January 1819 (Hamlet)
- Lecture 4 Thursday, 14 January 1819 (Macbeth)
- A Portion of Lecture 5: Thursday, 21 January 1819 (Othello)
- Lecture 6 Thursday, 28 January 1819 (King Lear)
- Lectures on Shakespeare, Milton, Dante, Spenser, Ariosto and Cervantes, 1819
- A Portion of Lecture 3: Thursday, 25 February 1819 (Troilus and Cressida)
- Appendix: A Hitherto Unnoticed Account of Coleridge's 1811–1812 Lecture Series
- Index
Lecture 4 - Thursday, 14 January 1819 (Macbeth)
from Lectures on Shakespeare 1818–1819
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- LECTURES ON SHAKESPEARE
- Lectures on Shakespeare 1811–1812
- Lectures on Shakespeare 1818–1819
- Lecture 1 Thursday, 17 December 1818 (The Tempest)
- Lecture 3 Thursday, 7 January 1819 (Hamlet)
- Lecture 4 Thursday, 14 January 1819 (Macbeth)
- A Portion of Lecture 5: Thursday, 21 January 1819 (Othello)
- Lecture 6 Thursday, 28 January 1819 (King Lear)
- Lectures on Shakespeare, Milton, Dante, Spenser, Ariosto and Cervantes, 1819
- A Portion of Lecture 3: Thursday, 25 February 1819 (Troilus and Cressida)
- Appendix: A Hitherto Unnoticed Account of Coleridge's 1811–1812 Lecture Series
- Index
Summary
The opening of Macbeth stands in contrast with that of Hamlet. In the latter, there is a gradual ascent from the simplest forms of conversation to the language of impassioned Intellect,—yet still the Intellect remaining the seat of passion: in the Macbeth, the invocation is at once made to the Imagination and the emotions connected therewith.
Hence the movement throughout is the most rapid of all Shakespeare's plays; and hence also, with the exception of the disgusting passage of the Porter (Act ii. sc. 3.), which I dare pledge myself to demonstrate to be an interpolation of the actors, there is not, to the best of my remembrance, a single pun or play on words in the whole drama. I have previously given an answer to the thousand times repeated charge against Shakespeare upon the subject of his punning, and I here merely mention the fact of the absence of any puns in Macbeth, as justifying a candid doubt at least, whether even in these figures of speech and fanciful modifications of language, Shakespeare may not have followed rules and principles that merit and would stand the test of philosophic examination. And hence, also, there is an entire absence of comedy, nay, even of irony and philosophic contemplation in Macbeth,—the play being wholly and purely tragic. For the same cause, there are no reasonings of equivocal morality, which would have required a more leisurely state and a consequently greater activity of mind;—no sophistry of self-delusion,—except only that previously to the dreadful act, Macbeth mistranslates the recoilings and ominous whispers of conscience into prudential and selfish reasonings, and, after the deed done, the terrors of remorse into fear from external dangers,—like delirious men who run away from the phantoms of their own brains, or, raised by terror to rage, stab the real object that is within their reach :—whilst Lady Macbeth merely endeavours to reconcile his and her own sinkings of heart by anticipations of the worst, and an affected bravado in confronting them. In all the rest, Macbeth's language is the grave utterance of the very heart, conscience-sick, even to the last faintings of moral death. It is the same in all the other characters.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Coleridge: Lectures on Shakespeare (1811-1819) , pp. 154 - 161Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2016