Book contents
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Cheating, corruption, and concealment
- Part I Motivations for dishonesty
- Part II Justifying dishonesty
- Part III Influences on dishonesty
- Part IV Reducing dishonesty
- 13 Religion, deception, and self-deception
- 14 The ergonomics of ethics
- 15 When opposition is beneficial
- 16 A cognitive approach to elicit verbal and nonverbal cues to deceit
- Book part
- Index
- References
15 - When opposition is beneficial
The case of productive disobedience
from Part IV - Reducing dishonesty
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Book contents
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Cheating, corruption, and concealment
- Part I Motivations for dishonesty
- Part II Justifying dishonesty
- Part III Influences on dishonesty
- Part IV Reducing dishonesty
- 13 Religion, deception, and self-deception
- 14 The ergonomics of ethics
- 15 When opposition is beneficial
- 16 A cognitive approach to elicit verbal and nonverbal cues to deceit
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cheating, Corruption, and ConcealmentThe Roots of Dishonesty, pp. 269 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral Study of Obedience.” American Psychologist, 19, 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocchiaro, P., & Zimbardo, P. (under review). On the dynamics of “productive disobedience”: Experimental investigations of defying unjust authority.Google Scholar
Bocchiaro, P., Zimbardo, P. G., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2012). To defy or not to defy: An experimental study of the dynamics of disobedience and whistle-blowing. Social Influence, 7, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheetham, M., Pedroni, A. F., Antley, A., Slater, M., & Jäncke, L. (2009). Virtual Milgram: Empathic concern or personal distress? Evidence from functional MRI and dispositional measures. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dambrun, M., & Vatiné, E. (2010). Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 760–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromm, E. (1963). Disobedience as a psychological and moral problem. In Urquhart, C. (Ed.), A matter of life (pp. 97–105). London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Giampaglia, G., & Roccato, M. (2002). La scala di autoritarismo di destra di Altemeyer: Un’analisi con il modello di Rasch per la costruzione di una versione italiana [The Altemeyer’s right-wing authoritarianism scale: An analysis using Rasch model for the construction of an Italian version]. TPM, 9, 93–111.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, A. J. (2007). Ethical issues in behavioral research: Basic and applied perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating effects of group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mixon, D. (1972). Instead of deception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 2, 145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, B, Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 76–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Packer, D. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 301–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pozzi, M., Fattori, F., Bocchiaro, P., & Alfieri, S. (2014). Do the right thing! A study on social representation of obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (1998). Social conflict. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 470–503). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., … Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE, 1, e39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeigler-Hill, V., Southard, A. C., Archer, L. M., & Donohoe, P. L. (2013). Neuroticism and negative affect influence the reluctance to engage in destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed