Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- one The politics of early intervention and evidence
- two Citizens of the future
- three Rescuing the infant brain
- four In whose best interests?
- five Case studies of interests at play
- six Saving children
- seven Reproducing inequalities
- eight Reclaiming the future: alternative visions
- References
- Index
one - The politics of early intervention and evidence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- one The politics of early intervention and evidence
- two Citizens of the future
- three Rescuing the infant brain
- four In whose best interests?
- five Case studies of interests at play
- six Saving children
- seven Reproducing inequalities
- eight Reclaiming the future: alternative visions
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
In 2002 a cross-sectional picture of two brains placed side by side was published in an article by Bruce Perry, founder of the ChildTrauma Academy in Houston Texas, an independent agency promoting a ‘Neurosequential Model’ for working with ‘at-risk’ children (see Figure 1.1). The image purported to show MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans of the structure of the brains of two 3-year-old children. One was the brain of a child who had what was referred to as a ‘normal’ development, and the other was a rather smaller, shrivelled brain with worrying ‘black holes’ (Allen, 2011a: 16) indicating enlarged ventricles or cortical atrophy from a child labelled as subject to ‘extreme neglect’.
This brain scans picture has become iconic, a key motif in political and thinktank reports concerning children's upbringing and outcomes from across the spectrum. It provides a graphic visual image for assertions that poor parenting causes lasting damage to babies’ and young children’s brain development. In two influential policy reports we read that:
A key finding is that babies are born with 25 per cent of their brains developed, and then there is a rapid period of development so that by the age of 3 their brains are 80 per cent developed. In that period, neglect, the wrong type of parenting and other adverse experiences can have a profound effect on how children are emotionally ‘wired’. This will deeply influence their future responses to events and their ability to empathise with other people. (Allen, 2011a: xiii)
From birth to age 18 months, connections in the brain are created at a rate of one million per second! The earliest experiences shape a baby's brain development and have a lifelong impact on that baby's mental and emotional health. (Leadsom et al, 2013: 5)
The Perry image feels like solid, objective evidence of the formative importance of attentive mothering for babies’ brain development and the need to intervene early to ensure that children's brains are not damaged by substandard parenting.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Challenging the Politics of Early InterventionWho's 'Saving' Children and Why, pp. 1 - 20Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2017