Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:10:40.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Lymphoma

from Part II - Oncologic applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Victor H. Gerbaudo
Affiliation:
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Hodgkin's (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) are potentially curable neoplasms owing to their marked chemo- and radiosensitivity as well as to recent introduction of more effective treatment strategies (1, 2). In these patients individualized therapy schemes based on well-defined risk categories can be devised with the prerequisite of an accurate staging system for evaluation of disease extent. Accurate risk profiling based on staging and established predictors of outcome as well as effective response evaluation during or following therapy and restaging are essential to determine the optimal treatment strategies. Anatomic imaging modalities, including both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cannot differentiate between active lymphoma and a benign process or inflammation-induced reactive changes in relatively small lymph node groups.

The increasing availability of positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, particularly fused with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has lead to the integration of this modality into the routine staging and restaging algorithms for lymphoma, providing comprehensive information about tumor glucose metabolism combined with anatomic data. The metabolic information can potentially impact patient management and survival, if decisions about additional therapy or to make a change in treatment regimen could be reliably based on FDG-PET imaging. There is now convincing evidence that FDG-PET is a more accurate imaging modality in the staging and evaluation of treatment response of lymphomas compared with conventional imaging techniques, including CT. Furthermore, persistent FDG uptake during and after chemotherapy has high sensitivity and specificity to differentiate residual viable disease from inflammatory post-therapy changes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Friedberg, JWMauch, PMRimsza, LMFisher, RI.Non-Hodgkin's lymphomasDeVita, VTLawrence, TSRosenberg, SADeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg's Cancer: Principles and Practice of OncologyPhiladelphia, PALippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008 2098Google Scholar
Diehl, VRe, DHarris, NLMauch, PM.Hodgkin lymphomaDeVita, VTLawrence, TSRosenberg, SADeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg's Cancer: Principles and Practice of OncologyPhiladelphia, PALippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008 2167Google Scholar
Swerdlow, SHCampo, EHarris, NLWHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid TissuesLyonInternational Agency for Research on Cancer 2008Google Scholar
Thill, RNeuerburg, JFabry, UComparison of findings with 18-FDG PET and CT in pretherapeutic staging of malignant lymphomaNuklearmedizin 1997 36 234Google ScholarPubMed
Buchmann, IReinhardt, MElsner, K2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma. A bicenter trialCancer 2001 91 8893.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elstrom, RGuan, LBaker, GUtility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classificationBlood 2003 101 3875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bangerter, MMoog, FBuchmann, IWhole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin's diseaseAnn Oncol 1998 9 1117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerusalem, GBeguin, YFassotte, MFWhole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose compared to standard procedures for staging patients with Hodgkin's diseaseHaematologica 2001 86 266Google ScholarPubMed
Jaffe, ESWilson, WH.Gray zone, synchronous, and metachronous lymphomas: diseases at the interface of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's lymphomaMauch, PMArmitage, JOCoiffier, BNon-Hodgkin's LymphomaPhiladelphia, PALippincott, Williams, and Wilkins 2004 69Google Scholar
Mounier, NSpina, MGabarre, JAIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphomaBlood 2006 107 3832CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mounier, NSpina, MSpano, JP.Hodgkin lymphoma in HIV positive patientsCurr HIV Res 2010 8 141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tirelli, USpina, MGaidano, GEpidemiological, biological and clinical features of HIV-related lymphomas in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapyAIDS 2000 14 1675CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiddemann, WBuske, CDreyling, MTreatment strategies in follicular lymphomas: current status and future perspectivesJ Clin Oncol 2005 23 6394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illidge, TChan, C.How have outcomes for patients with follicular lymphoma changed with the addition of monoclonal antibodies?Leuk Lymphoma 2008 49 1263CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Dortz, LDe Guibert, SBayat, SDiagnostic and prognostic impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphomaEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 37 2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wöhrer, SJaeger, UKletter, K18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) visualizes follicular lymphoma irrespective of gradingAnn Oncol 2006 17 780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler-Sagie, M.18F-FDG avidity in lymphoma readdressed: a study of 766 patientsJ Nucl Med 2010 51 25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrikanthan, SZhuang, HMSchuster, SAlavi, A.FDG-PET imaging in diagnosis of mantle cell lymphomaJ Nucl Med 2004 45Google Scholar
Brepoels, LStroobants, SDe Wever, WPositron emission tomography in mantle cell lymphomaLeuk Lymphoma 2008 49 1693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodet-Milin, CTouzeau, CLeux, CPrognostic impact of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in untreated mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective study from the GOELAMS groupEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 37 1633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kako, SIzutsu, KOta, YFDG-PET in T-cell and NK-cell neoplasmsAnn Oncol 2007 18 1685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheson, BDPfistner, BJuweid, MERevised response criteria for malignant lymphomaJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkHodgkin LymphomaNCCN v1 2011 http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/hodgkins.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Comprehensive Cancer Networknon-Hodgkin LymphomaNCCN v2 2011 http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nhl.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lister, TACrowther, DSutcliffe, SBReport of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease: Cotswald meetingJ Clin Oncol 1989 7 1630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, S.Validity of the Ann Arbor staging system classification for the non-Hodgkin's lymphomasCancer Treat Rep 1977 61 1023Google Scholar
Chew, FSSchellingerhout, DKee, SB.Primary lymphoma of skeletal muscleAm J Roentgenol 1999 172 1370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cazals-Hatem, DLepage, EBrice, PPrimary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study of 141 cases compared with 916 nonmediastinal large B-cell lymphomas – a GELA (“Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomas de l'Adulte”) studyAm J Surg Pathol 1996 20 877CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greiner, TCGascoyne, RDAnderson, MENodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease associated with large-cell lymphoma: analysis of Ig gene rearrangements by V-J polymerase chain reactionBlood 1996 88 657Google ScholarPubMed
Jares, PCampo, E.Advances in the understanding of mantle cell lymphomaBr J Haematol 2008 142 149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrer, ABosch, FVillamor, NCentral nervous system involvement in mantle cell lymphomaAnn Oncol 2008 19 135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, DHorning, SJ.Follicular lymphoma: clinical features and treatmentHematol Oncol Clin North Am 2008 22 863CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ott, GKatzenberger, TLohr, ACytomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic profiles of follicular lymphoma: 2 types of follicular lymphoma grade 3Blood 2002 99 3806CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montoto, SDavies, AJMatthews, JRisk and clinical implications of transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large B-cell lymphomaJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 2426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuen, ARKamel, OWHalpern, JLong-term survival after histologic transformation of low-grade follicular lymphomaJ Clin Oncol 1995 13 1726CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noy, ASchöder, HGönen, MThe majority of transformed lymphomas have high standardized uptake values (SUVs) on positron emission tomography (PET) scanning similar to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)Ann Oncol 2009 20 508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, STimothy, AO’Doherty, MJ2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose positron emission tomography in the pretreatment staging of Hodgkin disease: influence on patient management in a single institutionAnn Oncol 2000 11 1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoder, HNoy, AGonen, MIntensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomaJ Clin Oncol 2005 23 4643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isasi, CRLu, PBlaufox, MDA metaanalysis of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the staging and restaging of patients with lymphomaCancer 2005 104 1066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moog, FBangerter, MDiederichs, CGExtranodal malignant lymphoma: detection with FDG PET versus CTRadiology 1998 206 475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchings, MLoft, AHansen, MPosition emission tomography with or without computed tomography in the primary staging of Hodgkin's lymphomaHaematologica 2006 91 482Google ScholarPubMed
Picardi, MSoricelli, AGrimaldi, FFused FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT detects occult subdiaphragmatic involvement of Hodgkin's lymphoma thereby identifying patients requiring six cycles of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and consolidation radiation of spleenAnn Oncol 2011 22 671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatsumi, MCohade, CNakamoto, YDirect comparison of FDG PET and CT findings in patients with lymphoma: initial experienceRadiology 2005 237 1038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, NGHany, TFTaverna, CNon-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging – do we need contrast-enhanced CT?Radiology 2004 232 823CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Vigil, BGomez-Leon, NPinilla, IPET/CT in lymphoma: prospective study of enhanced full-dose PET/CT versus unenhanced low-dose PET/CTJ Nucl Med 2006 47 1643Google ScholarPubMed
Kwee, TCKwee, RMNievelstein, RA.Imaging instagin of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review. Blood 2008 111 504
Carr, RBarrington, SFMadan, BDetection of lymphoma in bone marrow by whole-body positron emission tomographyBlood 1998 91 3340Google ScholarPubMed
Pakos, EEFotopoulos, ADIoannidis, JP18F-FDG PET for evaluation of bone marrow infiltration in staging of lymphoma: a meta-analysisJ Nucl Med 2005 46 958Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, LMChen, FYJiang, XX(18)F-FDG PET, combined FDG-PET/CT and MRI for evaluation of bone marrow infiltration in staging of lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysisEur J Radiol 2012 81 303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gospodarowicz, MKFerry, JACavalli, F.Unique aspects of primary extranodal lymphomasMauch, PMArmitage, JOCoiffier, BNon-Hodgkin's LymphomaPhiladelphia, PALippincott, Williams, and Wilkins 2004 685Google Scholar
Enomoto, KHamada, KInohara, HMucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma studied with FDG-PET: a comparison with CT and endoscopic findingsAnn Nucl Med 2008 22 261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, PGZacharia, TTLaw, MNaidich, TPLeeds, NE.Central nervous system lymphoma characterization by diffusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopyJ Neuroimaging 2008 18 411Google Scholar
Herrlinger, USchabet, MClemens, MClinical presentation and therapeutic outcome in 26 patients with primary CNS lymphomaActa Neurol Scand 1998 97 257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heald, AEHoffman, JMBartlett, JAWaskin, HADifferentiation of central nervous system lesions in AIDS patients using positron emission tomography (PET)Int J STD AIDS 1996 7 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohile, NADeangelis, LMAbrey, LE.Utility of brain FDG-PET in primary CNS lymphomaClin Adv Hematol Oncol 2008 6 818Google ScholarPubMed
Blum, RHSeymour, JFWirth, AFrequent impact of [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomaClin Lymphoma 2004 4 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenberg, LSAntoch, GSchütt, PFDG PET/CT in restaging of patients with lymphomaEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004 31 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissin, CMHusband, JENicholas, DEversman, W.Benign thymic enlargement in adults after chemotherapy: CT demonstrationRadiology 1987 163 67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasseri, FEftekhari, F.Clinical and radiologic review of the normal and abnormal thymus: pearls and pitfallsRadiographics 2010 30 413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferdinand, BGupta, PKramer, EL.Spectrum of thymic uptake at 18F-FDG PETRadiographics 2004 24 1611CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdel-Dayem, HMRosen, GEl-Zeftawy, HFluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose splenic uptake from extramedullary hematopoiesis after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor stimulationClin Nucl Med 1999 24 319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surbone, ALongo, DLDeVita, VTResidual abdominal masses in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma after combination chemotherapy: significance and managementJ Clin Oncol 1988 6 1832CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radford, JACowan, RAFlanagan, MThe significance of residual mediastinal abnormality on the chest radiograph following treatment for Hodgkin diseaseJ Clin Oncol 1988 6 940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenclever, DDiehl, Vfor the International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease. A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's diseaseNew EnglJ Med 1998 339 1506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cremerius, UFabry, UNeuerburg, JPositron emission tomography with 18F-FDG to detect residual disease after therapy for malignant lymphomaNucl Med Commun 1998 19 1055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dittmann, HSokler, MKollmannsberger, CComparison of 18FDG-PET with CT scans in the evaluation of patients with residual and recurrent Hodgkin's lymphomaOncol Rep 2001 8 1393Google ScholarPubMed
Spaepen, KStroobants, SDupont, PPrognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG after first line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkins lymphoma: Is ([18F]FDG PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods?J Clin Oncol 2001 19 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinzani, PLMagagnoli, MChierichetti, FThe role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of lymphoma patientsAnn Oncol 1999 10 1181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikhaeel, NGMainwaring, PNunan, TTimothy, AR.Prognostic value of interim and post treatment FDG-PET scanning in Hodgkin lymphoma [abstract]Ann Oncol 2002 13Google Scholar
Wiedmann, EBaican, BHertel, APositron emission tomography (PET) for staging and evaluation of response to treatment in patients with Hodgkin's diseaseLeuk Lymphoma 1999 34 545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juweid, MEStroobants, SHoekstra, OSUse of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in LymphomaJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, SPGoldstone, AHMackinnon, SChemoresistant or aggressive lymphoma predicts for a poor outcome following reduced-intensity allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation: an analysis from the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow TransplantationBlood 2002 100 4310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spaepen, KStroobants, SDupont, PPrognostic value of pretransplantation positron emission tomography using fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantationBlood 2003 102 53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cremerius, UFabry, UWildberger, JEPre-transplant positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphomaBone Marrow Transpl 2002 30 103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becherer, AMitterbauer, MJaeger, UPositron emission tomography with [18F]2-fluoro-D-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) predicts relapse of malignant lymphoma after high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantationLeukemia 2002 16 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terasawa, TDahabreh, IJNihashi, T.Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response assessment before high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysisOncologist 2010 15 750CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, VBodet-Milin, CMoreau, AImpact of high-dose chemotherapy followed by auto-SCT for positive interim [(18)F] FDG-PET diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patientsBone Marrow Transpl 2011 46 393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulou, LSThanos, LZiakas, PD.Unifying the predictive value of pretransplant FDG PET in patients with lymphoma: a review and meta-analysis of published trialsEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 37 156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gisselbrecht, CVose, JNademanee, AGianni, AMNagler, A.Radioimmunotherapy for stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: in pursuit of a complete responseOncologist 2009 14 41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buske, CGisselbrecht, CGribben, JRefining the treatment of follicular lymphomaLeuk Lymphoma 2008 49 18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffel, RHedvat, CVTeruya-Feldstein, JPrognostic impact of proliferative index determined by quantitative image analysis and the International Prognostic Index in patients with mantle cell lymphomaAnn Oncol 2010 21 133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodet-Milin, CTouzeau, CLeux, CPrognostic impact of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in untreated mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective study from the GOELAMS groupEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 37 1633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tateishi, UTatsumi, MTerauchi, TRelevance of monitoring metabolic reduction in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphoma receiving bendamustine: a multicenter studyCancer Sci 2011 102 414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mato, ARSvoboda, JFeldman, T 2011
Le Dortz, LDe Guibert, SBayat, SDiagnostic and prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphomaEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 37 2307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishu, SQuigley, JMBishu, SRPredictive value and diagnostic accuracy of F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography treated grade 1 and 2 follicular lymphomaLeuk Lymphoma 2007 48 1548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopci, ESanti, IDerenzini, EFDG-PET in the assessment of patients with follicular lymphoma treated by ibritumomab tiuxetan Y 90: multicentric studyAnn Oncol 2010 21 1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storto, GDe Renzo, APellegrino, TAssessment of metabolic response to radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomaRadiology 2010 254 245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terasawa, TLau, JBardet, SFluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for interim response assessment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic reviewJ Clin Oncol 2009 27 1906CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haioun, CItti, ERahmouni, A[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcomeBlood 2005 106 1376CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikhaeel, NGHutchings, MFields, PAO'Doherty, MJTimothy, AR.FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomaAnn Oncol 2005 16 1514CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spaepen, KStroobants, SDupont, PEarly restaging positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomaAnn Oncol 2002 13 1356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kostakoglu, LGoldsmith, SJLeonard, JPFDG-PET after 1 cycle of therapy predicts outcome in diffuse large cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin diseaseCancer 2006 107 2678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moskowitz, CHSchöder, HTeruya-Feldstein, JRisk-adapted dose-dense immunochemotherapy determined by interim FDG-PET in advanced-stage diffuse large B-Cell lymphomaJ Clin Oncol 2010 28 1896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasamon, YLWahl, RLZiessman, HAPhase II study of risk-adapted therapy of newly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma based on midtreatment FDG-PET scanningBiol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009 15 242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terasawa, TNihashi, THotta, T18F-FDG PET for posttherapy assessment of Hodgkin's disease and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic reviewJ Nucl Med 2008 49 13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchings, MMikhaeel, NGFields, PAPrognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphomaAnn Oncol 2005 16 1160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchings, MLoft, AHansen, MFDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphomaBlood 2006 107 52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallamini, AHutchings, MRigacci, LEarly interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian–Danish studyJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 3746CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steidl, CLee, TShah, SPFarinha, PTumor-associated macrophages and survival in classic Hodgkin's lymphomaNew Engl J Med 2010 362 875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinzani, PLTani, MFanti, SEarly positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in Hodgkin's disease patientsAnn Oncol 2006 17 1296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerci, JJPracchia, LFLinardi, CC18F-FDG PET after 2 cycles of ABVD predicts event-free survival in early and advanced Hodgkin lymphomaJ Nucl Med 2010 51 1337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, JALacasce, ASZukotynski, KEnd-of-treatment but not interim PET scan predicts outcome in nonbulky limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphomaAnn Oncol 2011 22 910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, EJBar-Shalom, RTamir, ARisk-adapted BEACOPP regimen can reduce the cumulative dose of chemotherapy for standard and high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma with no impairment of outcomeBlood 2007 109 905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avigdor, ABulvik, SLevi, ITwo cycles of escalated BEACOPP followed by four cycles of ABVD utilizing early-interim PET/CT scan is an effective regimen for advanced high-risk Hodgkin's lymphomaAnn Oncol 2010 21 126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quddus, FArmitage, JOSalvage therapy for Hodgkin's lymphomaCancer J 2009 15 161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engert, AEichenauer, DADreyling, M.Hodgkin's lymphoma: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnn Oncol 2009 20 108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldschmidt, NOr, OKlein, MSavitsky, BPaltiel, O.The role of routine imaging procedures in the detection of relapse of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomaAnn Hematol 2011 90 165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinzani, PLStefoni, VTani, MRole of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the follow-up of lymphomaJ Clin Oncol 2009 27 1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, AIZuckerman, DSVan den Abbeele, ADSurveillance imaging of Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first remission: a clinical and economic analysisCancer 2010 116 3835CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Josting, ADiehl, V.Current treatment strategies in early stage Hodgkin's diseaseCurr Treat Options Oncol 2003 4 297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheson, B.The case against heavy PETingJ Clin Oncol 2009 11 1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, RMGospodarowicz, MKConnors, JMRandomized comparison of ABVD chemotherapy with a strategy that includes radiation therapy in patients with limited stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupJ Clin Oncol 2005 23 4634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brix, GLechel, UGlatting, GRadiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinationsJ Nucl Med 2005 46 608Google ScholarPubMed
Spaepen, KStroobants, SDupont P . [(18)F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does [(18)F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction?Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003 30 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meignan, MGallamini, AHaioun, C.Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in LymphomaLeuk Lymphoma 2009 50 1257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrington, SFQian, WSomer, EConcordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphomaEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 37 1824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thie, JAHubner, KFSmith, GT.Optimizing imaging time for improved performance in oncology PET studiesMol Imaging Biol 2002 4 238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, CItti, EHaioun, CEarly 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysisJ Nucl Med 2007 48 1626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×