Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables and Boxes
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Values, Participation and Mental Capacity Laws in International Comparative Perspective
- 2 Mental Capacity Law in England and Wales: A Value-Laden Jurisdiction
- 3 Mental Capacity Regimes Approach to Values and Participation in Proceedings Involving Individuals with Impaired Decision-Making Capacity in Scotland
- 4 The Fusion Approach to Mental Capacity Law in Northern Ireland: Possibilities and Challenges
- 5 Judging Values in a Time of Transition: An Irish Perspective
- 6 US Laws Relating to Decision-Making on Behalf of P
- 7 Indigenous Peoples with Disabilities and Canadian Mental Capacity Law
- 8 Capacity, Participation and Values in Australian Guardianship Laws
- 9 Navigating Values in Aotearoa New Zealand
- 10 Values and Participation of Individuals Without Mental Capacity in Hong Kong
- 11 Asian Values and Confucianism: How P’s Ability to Participate in Court Proceedings in Singapore Is Influenced by P’s Cultural Milieu
- 12 Respect for the Will and Preferences of People with Mental Disorders in German Law
- 13 The Place of Values and P’s Participation in Mental Capacity Law: Themes, Synergies and Tensions
- Index
12 - Respect for the Will and Preferences of People with Mental Disorders in German Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 January 2024
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables and Boxes
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Values, Participation and Mental Capacity Laws in International Comparative Perspective
- 2 Mental Capacity Law in England and Wales: A Value-Laden Jurisdiction
- 3 Mental Capacity Regimes Approach to Values and Participation in Proceedings Involving Individuals with Impaired Decision-Making Capacity in Scotland
- 4 The Fusion Approach to Mental Capacity Law in Northern Ireland: Possibilities and Challenges
- 5 Judging Values in a Time of Transition: An Irish Perspective
- 6 US Laws Relating to Decision-Making on Behalf of P
- 7 Indigenous Peoples with Disabilities and Canadian Mental Capacity Law
- 8 Capacity, Participation and Values in Australian Guardianship Laws
- 9 Navigating Values in Aotearoa New Zealand
- 10 Values and Participation of Individuals Without Mental Capacity in Hong Kong
- 11 Asian Values and Confucianism: How P’s Ability to Participate in Court Proceedings in Singapore Is Influenced by P’s Cultural Milieu
- 12 Respect for the Will and Preferences of People with Mental Disorders in German Law
- 13 The Place of Values and P’s Participation in Mental Capacity Law: Themes, Synergies and Tensions
- Index
Summary
Introduction
This article provides an overview of German guardianship law and Mental Health Assistance Laws (Psychisch-Kranken-Hilfe-Gesetze), with a special focus on the rights of people with mental disorders. Two legal systems in Germany are relevant in this context: the law on guardianship, which is part of civil law and the Mental Health Assistance Laws, which are part of public law.
Laws regulating forensic psychiatry will only be mentioned in passing. The law on guardianship has been reformed recently and the reform entered into force on 1 January 2023. This contribution focuses on the reformed law. To get a better sense of the regulations discussed in this chapter, it is helpful to briefly consider the nature of the legal system and legal tradition under discussion. The German law system is a civil law system, which is based on Roman-Germanic legal codes and takes as its starting point codified and written law. The logic of civil law systems differs from that of common law systems. Whereas in common law systems one moves from individual cases to general principles and laws, in civil law systems one moves in the opposite direction: from general laws to individual cases. Accordingly, it is possible to derive from the law what is lawful in an individual case. As an independent institution within the administration of justice, the judge is responsible for interpreting the law and applying it to individual cases. Courts thus resolve disputes over the application of codified laws.
In Germany, the Basic Law (or constitution) provides for fundamental individual rights, such as the rights to freedom, life and physical integrity. These rights may be interfered with only based on a written or codified law (Art. 2, para 2, sentence 1, GG1). The Federal Constitutional Court has the responsibility to ensure that laws and government policies are compliant with the constitution. If there is a dispute about the compliance of federal or state laws or policies with the constitution, the case can be brought before the Federal Constitutional Court. All federal and regional state bodies and legislatures are bound by its decisions and only the Federal Constitutional Court has the authority to declare federal and state laws and policies unconstitutional.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2023