Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T00:25:33.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

109. - Kant, Immanuel (1724–1804)

from K

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Immanuel Kant refers to Spinoza repeatedly, and almost always quite critically, in his published and unpublished writings. (Kant does praise Spinoza for his allegedly upstanding moral character. See below.) Kant’s comments on Spinoza are usually quite brief and display only superficial knowledge of his philosophy. He does not refer to specific parts of Spinoza’s works, strengthening the impression that he knew Spinoza only secondhand through the accounts of others. (This is the conclusion of Marshall 2021; Boehm 2014 argues for a more extensive engagement with Spinoza on Kant’s behalf.) For instance, Kant displays no awareness of the complexity of Spinoza’s doctrine of attributes, attributing to him merely the view that Thought and Extension are “properties [Eigenschaften]” or “predicates Prädicate]” of God (AA28:60, 1052).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Boehm, O. (2014). Kant’s Critique of Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, K., and Watkins, E. (2012). A difficulty still awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the threat of theological determinism. Kant-Studien, 103, 163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. (2021). Kant and Spinoza. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 517–26). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Massimi, M. (2017). Kant on the ideality of space and the argument from Spinozism. In O’Shea, J. (ed.), Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Messina, J. (2014). Kantian space, supersubstantivalism, and the spirit of Spinoza. Kant Yearbook, 6(1), 4363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerth, J. (2014). Kant on Mind, Actions, and Ethics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×