Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T01:06:45.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

G

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Adams, M. P. (2014). Hobbes, definitions, and simplest conceptions. Hobbes Studies, 27(1), 3560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H. E. (2022). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Spinoza. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, A. (2003). Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, A. (2017). Virtues of geometry. In Rocca, M. Della (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (pp. 1844). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1968). Spinoza, vol. i: Dieu (Éthique, 1). Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015). Spinoza on essences, universals, and beings of reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97(1), 5888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshelski, K. (2011). Two kinds of definition in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(2), 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribe, N. M. (1997). Cartesian optics and the mastery of nature. Isis, 88(1), 4261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfson, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. 2 vols. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Ariew, R. (1990). The infinite in Spinoza’s philosophy. In Curley, E. & Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 1631). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Carlisle, C. (2021). Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2002). Spinoza’s substance monism. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 1137). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1979). Spinoza’s ‘ontological’ argument. Philosophical Review, 88, 198223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1968). Spinoza, vol. i: Dieu (Éthique, 1). Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, ed. Rockmore, T., trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2022). Spinoza’s metaphysics of substance. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 61112). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2024). Spinoza’s ‘atheism,’ the Ethics and the TTP. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics: The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Beiser, F. C. (1987). The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E. (2012a). Goethe’s Spinozism. In Förster, E. & Melamed, Y. (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism (pp. 8599). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, E. (2012b). The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction, trans. Bowman, B. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. J. (2002). The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tantillo, A. O. (2002). The Will to Create: Goethe’s Philosophy of Nature. University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timm, H. (1974). Gott und die Freiheit: Studien zur Religionsphilosophie der Goethezeit, vol. I: Die Spinozarenaissance. Klostermann.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett .Google Scholar
Kisner, M. J. (2010). Perfection and desire: Spinoza on the good. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91, 97117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, R. (1978). Spinoza and ethical subjectivism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 8 (Supplement 1), 5982.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2019). Spinoza’s values: Joy, desire, and good in the Ethics. In Naaman-Zauderer, N. (ed.), Freedom, Action, and Motivation in Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 174–97). Routledge.Google Scholar
Scribano, E. (2012). La connaissance du bien et du mal: Du court traité à l’Éthique. In Jacquet, C. and Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza transalpin: Les interprétations actuelles en Italie (pp. 5978). Publications de la Sorbonne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youpa, A. (2010). Spinoza’s theories of value. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18, 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Gootjes, A. (2016). Sources inédites sur Spinoza: La correspondance entre Johannes Bouwmeester et Johannes Georgius Graevius. Archives de philosophie, 79, 817–19.Google Scholar
Gootjes, A. (2018). The first orchestrated attack on Spinoza: Johannes Melchioris and the Cartesian network in Utrecht. Journal of the History of Ideas, 79(1), 2343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gootjes, A. (2019). The Collegie der Sçavanten: A seventeenth-century Cartesian scholarly society in Utrecht. In Spaans, J. and Touber, J. (eds.), Enlightened Religion: From Confessional Churches to Polite Piety in the Dutch Republic (pp. 156–82). Brill.Google Scholar
Gootjes, A. (2020). Spinoza between French Libertines and Dutch Cartesians: The 1673 Utrecht visit. Modern Intellectual History, 17, 591617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maber, R. G. (2005). Publishing in the Republic of Letters: The Ménage-Graevius-Wetstein Correspondence 1679–1692. Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, S. (2019). Spinoza, Descartes, and the “Stupid Cartesians”. In Nadler, S., Schmaltz, T., and Antoine-Mahut, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism (pp. 659–77). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Brooke, C. (2012). Philosophic Pride. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2003). Stoics, Grotius, and Spinoza on moral deliberation. In Miller, J. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 259–74). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • G
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • G
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • G
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×