Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T00:41:21.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

E

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Edited by
Karolina Hübner  and
Justin Steinberg
Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 133 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Dahlbeck, J. (2016). Spinoza and Education: Freedom, Understanding and Empowerment. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, I. (1994). Maimonidean aspects in Spinoza’s thought. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 17(1/2), 153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (2011). Creating rational understanding: Spinoza as a social epistemologist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 85(1), 181–99. Repr. in James, Spinoza on Learning to Live Together. Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2024). How to Make Philosophers. In Garber, D. et al., Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2021). Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. (2005). Spinoza and the education of imagination. In Oksenberg Rorty, A. (ed.), Philosophers on Education: New Historical Perspectives (pp. 156–70). Routledge.Google Scholar
Novaes de Rezende, C. (2018). Spinoza’s proposal for a doctrine of children’s education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(9), 830–38.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2020). Politics as a model of pedagogy in Spinoza. Ethics and Education, 15(2), 158–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Atkins, D. (1978). George Eliot and Spinoza. Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Eliot, G. (1990[1851]). R. W. Mackay’s The Progress of the Intellect. In Eliot, , Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings, ed. Byatt, A. S. and Warren, N. (pp. 135–41). Penguin.Google Scholar
Gatens, M. (2012). Compelling fictions: Spinoza and George Eliot on imagination and belief. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(1), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1845). The Biographical History of Philosophy. Appleton.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1981). Ethics, trans. Eliot, G., ed. Deegan, G. T.. Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Romantic Reassessment 102. Universität Salzburg.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (2020). Ethics, trans. Eliot, G., ed. Carlisle, C.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bedjai, M. (1990). Metaphysique, éthique et politique dans l’œuvre du docteur Franciscus van den Enden (1602–1674). Studia Spinozana, 6, 291–301.Google Scholar
Meininger, J. V., and Suchtelen, G. van. (1980). Liever met wercken, als met woorden; de levensreis van doctor Franciscus van den Enden. Leermeester van Spinoza, complotteur tegen Lodewijk de Veertiende. Heureka.Google Scholar
Mertens, F. (2012). Van den Enden and Spinoza. Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.Google Scholar
Mertens, F. (2017). Van den Enden and Religion. In Lavaert, S. & Schröder, W. (eds.), The Dutch Legacy: Radical Thinkers of the 17th Century and the Enlightenment (pp. 62–89). Brill.Google Scholar
Proietti, O. (2010). Philedonius, 1657. Spinoza, Van den Enden e i classici latini. Eum.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, B. (2014). Spinoza, equality, and hierarchy. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31(1), 59–77.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (1991). The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics, trans. M. Hardt. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, H. (2012). Eve’s perfection: Spinoza on sexual (in)equality. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(4), 559–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, J. (2018). Spinoza’s Political Psychology: The Taming of Fortune and Fear. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Garrett, D. (2009). Spinoza on the essence of the human body and the part of the mind that is eternal. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 284–302). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K. (2015). Spinoza on essences, universals, and beings of reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(2), 58–88.Google Scholar
Hübner, K. (2017). The trouble with feelings, or Spinoza on the identity of power and essence. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, C. (2001). Spinoza’s distinction between essence and existence. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 245–52.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2017). Aspects of Spinoza’s theory of essence: Formal essence, non-existence and two types of actuality. In Sinclair, M. (ed.), The Actual and the Possible: Modality and Metaphysics in Modern Philosophy (pp. 11–44). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lærke, M. (2024). Prejudices, common notions, intuitions: Knowledge of God between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics. The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (pp. 59–80). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. P. (2008). The framework of essences in Spinoza’s Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16(3), 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (2015). Spinoza on eternity and duration: The 1663 connection. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making (pp. 205–20). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. M. (2011). Spinoza on the essences of modes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 19(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Donagan, A. (1973). Spinoza’s proof of immortality. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A collection of Critical Essays (pp. 241–58). University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2005). ‘A free man thinks of nothing less than of death’: Spinoza on the eternity of the mind. In Mercer, C. & O’Neill, E. (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics (pp. 103–18). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grey, J. (2014). Spinoza on composition, causation and the mind’s eternity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22, 446–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. (1996). Spinoza’s version of the eternity of the mind. In Grene, M. & Nails, D. (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences (pp. 211–33). Springer.Google Scholar
Matheron, A. (1994). La vie éternelle et le corps selon Spinoza. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 120(1), 27–40.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (1994). L’expérience et l’éternité. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Nadler, S. (2001). Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parchment, S. (2000). The mind’s eternity in Spinoza’s Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38(3), 349–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. (1981). Spinoza’s theory of the eternity of the human mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11, 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Akkerman, Fokke. (1980). Studies in the Posthumous Works of Spinoza: On Style, Earliest Translation and Reception, Earliest and Modern Edition of Some Texts. PhD thesis, University of Groningen. http://hdl.handle.net/11370/b7aaa2e2-3561-4892-afd7-fb9daca9562bGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Lodewijk (attributed). (1666). Philosophia S. Scripturæ interpres: Exercitatio paradoxa, in quâ veram philosophiam infallibilem S. Literas interpretandi normam esse apodicticè demonstratur, et discrepantes ab hâc sententiæ expenduntur, ac refelluntur. [Rieuwertsz].Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F., and Steenbakkers, P. (2020). Introduction. In Spinoza, Œuvres, vol. iv: Ethica/Éthique, ed. Akkerman, F. and Steenbakkers, P., trans. Moreau, P.-F. (pp. 13–66). Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1802–03). Benedicti de Spinoza Opera quae supersunt omnia, ed. Paulus, Heinrich Eberhard Gottlob. 2 vols. In bibliopolio academico.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, B. (2020). Œuvres, vol. iv: Ethica/Éthique, ed. Akkerman, F. and Steenbakkers, P., trans. Moreau, P.-F.. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Spruit, L., and Totaro, P. (eds.). (2011). The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s Ethica. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbakkers, P. (1994). Spinoza’s Ethica from Manuscript to Print: Studies on Text, Form and Related Topics. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, P (2009). The textual history of Spinoza’s Ethics. In Koistinen, O. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics (pp. 26–41). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Ven, J. (2022). Printing Spinoza: A Descriptive Bibliography of the Works Published in the Seventeenth Century. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Garrett, D. (2017). The indisernibility of identicals and the transitivity of identity in Spinoza’s logic of the attributes. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 12–42). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, C. (2001). Spinoza’s distinction between essence and existence. Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 245–52.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2012). Spinoza’s deification of existence. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, 6, 75–104.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, S. R. (2021). Avicenna and Spinoza on essence and existence. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza (pp. 30–40). Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Särman, S. (2020). Spinoza and the Inevitable Perfection of Being. PhD thesis, Hong Kong University.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. M. (1973). Experience in Spinoza’s theory of knowledge. In Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 25–59). Anchor.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F. (1994). Spinoza: L’expérience et l’éternité. Presses Universitaires de France. Translated by R. Boncardo as Experience and Eternity in Spinoza (Edinburgh University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Renz, U. (2010). Die Erklärbarkeit von Erfahrung: Subjektivität und Realismus in Spinozas Theorie des menschlichen Geistes. Klostermann. Translated as The Explainability of Experience: Realism and Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Theory of the Human Mind (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, M.. Zone.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2002). Spinoza’s substance monism. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 11–34). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, K., and Mátyási, R. (2021). Spinoza on expression and grounds of intelligibility. Philosophical Quarterly, 72(3), 628–51.Google Scholar
Kaufman, F. (1940). Spinoza’s system as theory of expression. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1(1), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M. (2004). Spinoza’s metaphysics of desire: The demonstration of IIIP6. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 86(1), 21–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newlands, S. (2018). Reconceiving Spinoza. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgado Borge, A. (2022). Spinoza on essence constitution. Philosophia, 50, 987–99.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Cover, J. (2003). Spinoza’s extended substance. In Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C. (eds.), New Essays on the Rationalists (pp. 105–33). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1997). Spinoza. 2 vols. Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Peterman, A. (2015). Spinoza on Extension. Philosophers’ Imprint, 15(14), 1–23.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. (1999). Spinoza on the vacuum. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 81(2), 174–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • E
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • E
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • E
  • Edited by Karolina Hübner, Cornell University, New York, Justin Steinberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
  • Online publication: 09 January 2025
Available formats
×