Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Editors
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Overview of the Handbook
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Models and Measures
- Part III Linguistic Theories and Frameworks
- Part IV First Language Processing
- Part V Bilingual Acquisition and Processing
- Part VI Language Disorders, Interventions, and Instruction
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part IV - First Language Processing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Editors
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Overview of the Handbook
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Models and Measures
- Part III Linguistic Theories and Frameworks
- Part IV First Language Processing
- Part V Bilingual Acquisition and Processing
- Part VI Language Disorders, Interventions, and Instruction
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language , pp. 419 - 526Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20–29.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(4), 1158–1170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, K. K. H., Lam, C. B., & Cheung, K. C. (2018). Visuomotor integration and executive functioning are uniquely linked to Chinese word reading and writing in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, K. K., & McBride‐Chang, C. (2011). Executive functioning skills uniquely predict Chinese word reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 909–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F. (1998). Working memory deficits of reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70(2), 75–96.Google Scholar
Demetriou, A., Kui, Z. X., Spanoudis, G., Christou, C., Kyriakides, L., & Platsidou, M. (2005). The architecture, dynamics, and development of mental processing: Greek, Chinese, or Universal? Intelligence, 33(2), 109–141.Google Scholar
Demoulin, C., & Kolinsky, R. (2016). Does learning to read shape verbal working memory? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(3), 703–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, C. S. H. (1997). The importance of phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory to children’s success in learning to read Chinese. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 40(4), 211–219.Google Scholar
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1995). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54(1), 73–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1997). A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(2), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. (2010). Developmental stages in reading Chinese as a second language. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).Google Scholar
Kim, S., Christianson, K., & Packard, J. (2015). Working memory in L2 character processing: The case of learning to read Chinese. In Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 85–104). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Leather, C. V., & Henry, L. A. (1994). Working memory span and phonological awareness tasks as predictors of early reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58(1), 88–111.Google Scholar
McBride, C. (2016). Children’s literacy development: A cross-cultural perspective on learning to read and write (2nd ed). Routledge.Google Scholar
McBride‐Chang, C., & Chang, L. (1995). Memory, print exposure, and metacognition: Components of reading in Chinese children. International Journal of Psychology, 30(5), 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S. H. (2000). Developmental issues in Chinese children’s character acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Zhou, Y., Cho, J. R., Aram, D., Levin, I., & Tolchinsky, L. (2011). Visual spatial skill: A consequence of learning to read? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(2), 256–262.Google Scholar
Miyake, A. (2001). Individual differences in working memory: Introduction to the special section. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 163.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Opitz, B., Schneiders, J. A., Krick, C. M., & Mecklinger, A. (2014). Selective transfer of visual working memory training on Chinese character learning. Neuropsychologia, 53, 1–11.Google Scholar
Rudner, M., & Rönnberg, J. (2008). The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing. Cognitive Processing, 9(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47.Google Scholar
Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 886.Google Scholar
So, D., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). Learning to read Chinese: Semantic, syntactic, phonological and working memory skills in normally achieving and poor Chinese readers. Reading and Writing, 9(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(24), 8781–8785.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., … & Garon, T. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 468.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Allen, R. J., Fang, S. Y., & Li, P. (2017). Cross-modal working memory binding and L1–L2 word learning. Memory and Cognition, 45(8), 1371–1383.Google Scholar
Wang, S., & Gathercole, S. E. (2013). Working memory deficits in children with reading difficulties: Memory span and dual task coordination. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 188–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., & McBride, C. (2017). Beyond copying: A comparison of multi-component interventions on Chinese early literacy skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(3), 380–389.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. E. (2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Wang, L. C., Liu, D., Chen, Y., & Tao, L. (2020). The moderation effect of processing efficiency on the relationship between visual working memory and Chinese character recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. (Article 1899).Google Scholar
Yang, L. Y., Guo, J. P., Richman, L. C., Schmidt, F. L., Gerken, K. C., & Ding, Y. (2013). Visual skills and Chinese reading acquisition: A meta-analysis of correlation evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 115–143.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Peng, P., & Meng, X. (2019). How do metalinguistic awareness, working memory, reasoning, and inhibition contribute to Chinese character reading of kindergarten children? Infant and Child Development, 28(3), e2122.Google Scholar
References
Alderete, J., & Davies, M. (2019). Investigating perceptual biases, data reliability, and data discovery in a methodology for collecting speech errors from audio recordings. Language and Speech, 62, 281–317.Google Scholar
Allport, D. A. (1984). Speech production and comprehension: One lexicon or two? In Cognition and motor processes (pp. 209–228). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allum, P. H., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2007). Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 791.Google Scholar
Allum, P. H., & Wheeldon, L. (2009). Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: Implications for the conceptual–syntactic interface. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1240.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2021). A multicomponent model of working memory. In Working memory: The state of the science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.Google Scholar
Bemis, D. K., & Pylkkänen, L. (2013). Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1859–1873.Google Scholar
Berndt, R. S., & Caramazza, A. (1980). A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca’s aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 225–278.Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 627–652.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B., Campbell, R., & Howard, D. (1986). The uses of short-term memory: A case study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 705–737.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C., & Papagno, C. (2011). Bridging the gap between brain and syntax: A case for a role of the phonological loop. In Di Sciullo, A. M. & Boeckx, C. (Eds.), Biolinguistic approaches to language evolution and variation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, N., Morey, C. C., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2021). An embedded-processes approach to working memory. In Working memory: The state of the science (p. 44). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 19, 450.Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2010). Role of working-memory capacity in cognitive control. Current Anthropology, 51, S17–S26.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2007). As far as individuals with conduction aphasia understood these sentences were ungrammatical: Garden path in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 21, 570–586.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In Language production, Vol. 1: Speech and talk (pp. 177–220). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279.Google Scholar
Gvion, A., & Friedmann, N. (2012a). Does phonological working memory impairment affect sentence comprehension? A study of conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 494–535.Google Scholar
Gvion, A., & Friedmann, N. (2012b). Phonological short-term memory in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 579–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. C., Martin, R. C., & Burton, P. C. (2009). Converging functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a role of the left inferior frontal lobe in semantic retention during language comprehension. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 685–704.Google Scholar
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press Series in Natural-Language Processing. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194–201.Google Scholar
Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (2002). The relationship of input and output phonological processing: An evaluation of models and evidence to support them. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 107–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000447Google Scholar
Martin, R. C. (2021). The critical role of semantic working memory in language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C. (1987). Articulatory and phonological deficits in short-term memory and their relation to syntactic processing. Brain and Language, 32, 159–192.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., & Breedin, S. D. (1992). Dissociations between speech perception and phonological short-term memory deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 509–534.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Crowther, J. E., Knight, M., Tamborello II, F. P., & Yang, C.-L. (2010). Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope. Cognition, 116, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. C., Ding, J., Hamilton, A. C., & Schnur, T. T. (2021). Working memory capacities neurally dissociate. Cerebral Cortex Communications.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., & Freedman, M. L. (2001). Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: Implications for speech production. Memory, 9, 261–280.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., & He, T. (2004). Semantic short-term memory and its role in sentence processing: A replication. Brain and Language, 89, 76–82.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3–29.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Miller, M., & Vu, H. (2004). Lexical‐semantic retention and speech production: Further evidence from normal and brain‐damaged participants for a phrasal scope of planning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 625–644.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Rapp, B., & Purcell, J. (2021). Domain-specific working memory. In Working memory: The state of the science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., & Romani, C. (1994). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension: A multiple-components view. Neuropsychology, 8, 506–523.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., & Schnur, T. T. (2019). Independent contributions of semantic and phonological working memory to spontaneous speech in acute stroke. Cortex, 112, 58–68.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Shelton, J. R., & Yaffee, L. S. (1994). Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 83–111.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Wu, D., Freedman, M., Jackson, E. F., & Lesch, M. (2003). An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological versus semantic short-term memory. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 341–360.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture–word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477–496.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717.Google Scholar
Norris, D. (2017). Short-term memory and long-term memory are still different. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 992.Google Scholar
Okada, K., & Hickok, G. (2006). Identification of lexical-phonological networks in the superior temporal sulcus using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport, 17, 1293–1296.Google Scholar
Papagno, C., Comi, A., Riva, M., Bizzi, A., Vernice, M., Casarotti, A., Fava, E., & Bello, L. (2017). Mapping the brain network of the phonological loop. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 3011–3024.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1993). The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature, 362, 342–345.Google Scholar
Pisoni, A., Mattavelli, G., Casarotti, A., Comi, A., Riva, M., Bello, L., & Papagno, C. (2019). The neural correlates of auditory-verbal short-term memory: A voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study on 103 patients after glioma removal. Brain Structure and Function, 224, 2199–2211.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F., Yachzel, B., Carpenter, E., & Sherman, J. (1986). Pictures in sentences: Understanding without words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 281.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 265–282.Google Scholar
Rapp, B., & Fischer-Baum, S. (2014). Representation of orthographic knowledge. In Goldrick, M., Ferreira, V. S., & Miozzo, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romani, C. (1992). Are there distinct input and output buffers? Evidence from an aphasic patient with an impaired output buffer. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 131–162.Google Scholar
Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479.Google Scholar
Schnur, T. T., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Planning at the phonological level during sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 189–213.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. F., & Dell, G. S. (2010). Case series investigations in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 477–494.Google Scholar
Shallice, T., & Butterworth, B. (1977). Short-term memory impairment and spontaneous speech. Neuropsychologia, 15, 729–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T., Rumiati, R. I., & Zadini, A. (2000). The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 517–546.Google Scholar
Shivde, G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004). Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 10–19.Google Scholar
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205–246.Google Scholar
Snyder, H. R., & Munakata, Y. (2008). So many options, so little time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1083–1088.Google Scholar
Tan, Y., & Martin, R. C. (2018). Verbal short-term memory capacities and executive function in semantic and syntactic interference resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 113, 111–125.Google Scholar
Tan, Y., Martin, R. C., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2017). Semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension: A comparison of working memory models. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 198.Google Scholar
Vallar, G. (2006). Memory systems: The case of the phonological store. A Festschrift for Cognitive Neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 135-155.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., Johns, C. L., & Kukona, A. (2014). Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension. Cognition, 131, 373–403.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & Lewis, R. L. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 285–316.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 247–263.Google Scholar
Varkanitsa, M., & Caplan, D. (2018). On the association between memory capacity and sentence comprehension: Insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the aphasia literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 48, 4–25.Google Scholar
Waters, G., Caplan, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1991). On the structure of verbal short-term memory and its functional role in sentence comprehension: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 81–126.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (2002). The minimal unit of phonological encoding: Prosodic or lexical word. Cognition, 85, B31–B41.Google Scholar
Yue, Q., & Martin, R. C. (2021). Maintaining verbal short-term memory representations in non-perceptual parietal regions. Cortex, 138, 72–89.Google Scholar
Yue, Q., Martin, R. C., Hamilton, A. C., & Rose, N. S. (2019). Non-perceptual regions in the left inferior parietal lobe support phonological short-term memory: Evidence for a buffer account? Cerebral Cortex, 29, 1398–1413.Google Scholar
Zahn, R., Schnur, T. T., & Martin, R. C. (2019, October). Phonological retrieval mediates the relation of phonological short-term memory and narrative production. Academy of Aphasia Annual Meeting.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Tesol Quarterly, 45, 235–266.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.Google Scholar
Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don’t understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. Metacognition, Cognition, and Human Performance, 1, 155–205.Google Scholar
Baker, L., Zeliger-Kandasamy, A., & DeWyngaert, L. U. (2014). Neuroimaging evidence of comprehension monitoring. Psihologijske Teme, 23, 167–187.Google Scholar
Blanc, N., Stiegler-Balfour, J. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2011). Does the certainty of information influence the updating process? Evidence from the reading of news articles. Discourse Processes, 48, 387–403.Google Scholar
Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Kendeou, P. (2014). The interplay of reader goals, working memory, and text structure during reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 206–219.Google Scholar
Boudewyn, M. A., Long, D. L., & Swaab, T. Y. (2015). Graded expectations: Predictive processing and the adjustment of expectations during spoken language comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 607–624.Google Scholar
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106-113.Google Scholar
Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence. Cognition, 136, 135–149.Google Scholar
Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143.Google Scholar
Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2018). The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 801–826.Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503. doi:http://dx.-doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205Google Scholar
Carretti, B, Belacchi, C., & Cornoldi, C. (2010). Difficulties in working memory updating in individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 54, 337–345. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01267.xGoogle Scholar
Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, 20, 506.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
De Beni, R., Borella, E., & Carretti, B. (2007). Reading comprehension in aging: The role of working memory and metacomprehension. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 189–212.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and language, 41, 496–518.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Piñar, P. (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 443–472.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 413–433.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1461.Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Hamlett, C. L., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Is word-problem solving a form of text comprehension? Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 204–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. O., Gómez-Veiga, I., Duque, G., & Elosúa, M. R. (2014). Executive processes, reading comprehension and academic achievement in 3rd grade primary students. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 41–48.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Attenuating interference during comprehension: The role of suppression. (85–104). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245–262. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245Google ScholarPubMed
Gullifer, J. W., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2013). When language switching has no apparent cost: Lexical access in sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 278.Google Scholar
Hansen, L. B., Morales, J., Macizo, P., Duñabeitia, J. A., Saldaña, D., Carreiras, M., Fuentes, L. J., & Bajo, M. T. (2017). Reading comprehension and immersion schooling: Evidence from component skills. Developmental Science, 20, e12454.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56.Google Scholar
Horiba, Y., & Fukaya, K. (2015). Reading and learning from L2 text: Effects of reading goal, topic familiarity, and language proficiency. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27, 22–46.Google Scholar
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127, 277–288.Google Scholar
Joh, J., & Plakans, L. (2017). Working memory in L2 reading comprehension: The influence of prior knowledge. System, 70, 107–120.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122.Google Scholar
Kaan, E., Kirkham, J., & Wijnen, F. (2016). Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures. Bilingualism, 19, 1.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P. (2014). Validation and comprehension: An integrated overview. Discourse Processes, 51, 189–200. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855874Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033295X.-85.5.363Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R. (2016). Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 602–616.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.Google Scholar
Linderholm, T., Cong, X., & Zhao, Q. (2008). Differences in low and high working-memory capacity readers’ cognitive and metacognitive processing patterns as a function of reading for different purposes. Reading Psychology, 29, 61–85.Google Scholar
Martín, M. C., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2010). Time course of inhibitory processes in bilingual language processing. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 679–693.Google Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 574–588.Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 668–682.Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. (pp. 297–384) Elsevier Academic Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar
Muijselaar, M. M., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The effects of updating ability and knowledge of reading strategies on reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 111–117.Google Scholar
Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 344–354.Google Scholar
Pelegrina, S., Capodieci, A., Carretti, B., & Cornoldi, C. (2015). Magnitude representation and working memory updating in children with arithmetic and reading comprehension disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 658–668.Google Scholar
Pérez, A., Cain, K., Castellanos, M. C., & Bajo, T. (2015). Inferential revision in narrative texts: An ERP study. Memory & Cognition, 43, 1105–1135.Google Scholar
Pérez, A., Hansen, L., & Bajo, T. (2019). The nature of first and second language processing: The role of cognitive control and L2 proficiency during text-level comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 930–948.Google Scholar
Pérez, A., Joseph, H. S., Bajo, T., & Nation, K. (2016). Evaluation and revision of inferential comprehension in narrative texts: an eye movement study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 549–566.Google Scholar
Pérez, A. I., Paolieri, D., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2014). The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 15, 405–413.Google Scholar
Pérez, A., Schmidt, E., Kourtzi, Z., & Tsimpli, I. (2020). Multimodal semantic revision during inferential processing: The role of inhibitory control in text and picture comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 138(107313).Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Goldman, S. R. (1976). Discourse memory and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 33–42.Google Scholar
Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2010). Suppressing irrelevant information from working memory: Evidence for domain-specific deficits in poor comprehenders. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 380–391. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.005Google Scholar
Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8-to-15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: The role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 128–142.Google Scholar
Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2007). Revising what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2019–2032. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192934CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryskin, R., Levy, R. P., & Fedorenko, E. (2020). Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward. Neuropsychologia, 136, 107258.Google Scholar
Schroeder, P. J. (2014). The effects of age on processing and storage in working memory span tasks and reading comprehension. Experimental Aging Research, 40, 308–331.Google Scholar
Shin, J. (2020). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 873–900.Google Scholar
Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2019). The interplay between working memory and background knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. Tesol Quarterly, 53, 320–347.Google Scholar
Singh, N., & Mishra, R. K. (2013). Second language proficiency modulates conflict-monitoring in an oculomotor Stroop task: Evidence from Hindi-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 322.Google Scholar
Van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. C. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25, 1665–1690.Google Scholar
Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 176–190.Google Scholar
Wagoner, S. A. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly, 328–346.Google Scholar
Was, C. A., & Woltz, D. J. (2007). Reexamining the relationship between working memory and comprehension: The role of available long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 86–102.Google Scholar
Zirnstein, M., van Hell, J. G., & Kroll, J. F. (2018). Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals. Cognition, 176, 87–106.Google Scholar
References
Acheson, D. J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J. R., & Postle, B. R. (2011). A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(6), 1358–1367. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21519CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and phonological encoding in speech production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 50–68.Google Scholar
Allum, P., and Wheeldon, L. (2007). Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33, 791–810.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E., & Nozari, N. (2017). The effects of utterance planning and stimulation of left prefrontal cortex on the production of referential expressions. Cognition, 160, 127–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.008Google Scholar
Bishop, J. (2020). Exploring the similarity between implicit and explicit prosody: Prosodic phrasing and individual differences. Language and Speech, 64(4), 873–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920972732Google Scholar
Bishop, J., & Intlekofer, D. (2020). Lower working memory capacity is associated with shorter prosodic phrases: Implications for speech production planning. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, May 2020, Tokyo, Japan. doi:10.21437Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89(1), 1–47.Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., and Konopka, A. E (2008). Little houses and casas pequeñas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish. Cognition, 109, 274–280.Google Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 592–609.Google Scholar
Christodoulides, G. (2016). Effects of cognitive load on speech production and perception (Doctoral thesis, Universite Catholique de Louvain).Google Scholar
Cole, J. R., & Reitter, D. (2019). The role of working memory in syntactic sentence realization: A modeling and simulation approach. Cognitive Systems Research, 55, 95–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.01.001Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
De Looze, C., Moreau, N., Renié, L., Kelly, F, Ghio, A., Rico, A., Audoin, B., Viallet, F., Pelletier, J., & Petrone, C. (2017). Effects of cognitive impairment on prosodic parameters of speech production planning in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neuropsychology, 13, 22–45. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12127.Google Scholar
De Looze, C., Kelly, F., Crosby, L., Vourdanou, A., Coen, R. F., Walsh, C., et al. (2018). Changes in speech chunking in reading aloud is a marker of mild cognitive impairment and mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 15, 828–847. doi: 10.2174/1567205015666180404165017Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.Google Scholar
Ford, M., & Holmes, V. M. (1978). Planning units in sentence production. Cognition, 6, 35–53.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–235.Google Scholar
Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In Butterworth, B. (Ed.), Language Production, Vol. 1: Speech and talk. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1–B14.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274−279.Google Scholar
Hardy, S. M., Segaert, K., & Wheeldon, L. (2020) Healthy aging and sentence production: Disrupted lexical access in the context of intact syntactic planning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 257.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 181−204.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Moors, A. (2016). On the automaticity of language processing. In Schmid, H.-J. (Ed.), Entrenchment, memory and automaticity: The psychology of linguistic knowledge and language learning (pp. 201-223). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ivanova, I., & Ferreirva, V. S. (2019). The role of working memory for syntactic formulation in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 45, 1791–1814. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000672Google Scholar
Ishkhanyan, B., Boye, K., and Mogensen, J. (2019). The meeting point: where language production and working memory share resources. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 61–79. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9589-0Google Scholar
Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., & Kello, C. T. (2015). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production and reading aloud: Evidence and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1457 doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.942Google Scholar
Keating, P. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2002). A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 101, 112–156.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (2004). Working memory components in written sentence generation. The American Journal of Psychology, 117(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149005Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T., Oliver, T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production. Acta Psychologica, 124, 382–397.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., Turner, C. E., Cahill, M., & Mertens, A. (2013). Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model. Journal of Writing Research, 5(2), 159–190Google Scholar
Kempen, G. & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.Google Scholar
Klaus, J., Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2017). Planning sentences while doing other things at the same time: Effects of concurrent verbal and visuospatial working memory load. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 811–831.Google Scholar
Klaus, J., & Schriefers, H. (2018). An investigation of the role of working memory capacity and naming speed in phonological advance planning in language production. The Mental Lexicon, 13, 159–185.Google Scholar
Kondyles, L. N., & Swets, B. (2020). Effects of tDCS on the scope of sentence planning. Poster presented at the 61st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Virtual.Google Scholar
Konopka, A. E. (2012). Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 143–162.Google Scholar
Krivokapić, J. (2007). Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 162–179.Google Scholar
Krivokapić, J. (2012). Prosodic planning in speech production. In Fuchs, S., Weirich, M., Pape, D., &Perrier, P. (Eds.), Speech planning and dynamics (pp. 157–190). Peter Lang,Google Scholar
Lange, V. M., & Laganaro, M. (2014). Inter-subject variability modulates phonological advance planning in the production of adjective-noun phrases. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 43. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00043Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 433–452.Google Scholar
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7(6), 485–495.Google Scholar
Maher, P. (2011). Tom Waits on Tom Waits: Interviews and encounters. Chicago Review Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Crowther, J. E., Knight, M. Tamborello, F. P., & Yang, C-L. (2010). Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope. Cognition, 116, 177–192.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., & Slevc, L.R. (2014). Language production and working memory. In Ferreria, V., Goldrick, M., & Miozzo, M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language production. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. C., Yan, H., & Schnur, T. T. (2014). Working memory and planning during sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 152, 120–132.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory & Language 35. 477–496. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0026Google Scholar
Meyer, A., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48,131–147. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00509-0Google Scholar
Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1146–1160.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25–B33.Google Scholar
Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J.D., & Schriefers, H. (2010). Phonological advance planning in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 526–540.Google Scholar
Petrone, C., Fuchs, S., & Krivokapić, J. (2011). Consequences of working memory differences and phrasal length on pause duration and fundamental frequency. Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar on Speech Production, 393-400. Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Power, M. J. (1985). Sentence production and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(3), 367–385.Google Scholar
Roeser, J., Torrance, M., & Baguley, T. (2019). Advance planning in written and spoken sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(11), 1983.Google Scholar
Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture–word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. 1999. Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 11. 17–50. doi:10.1080/713752301Google Scholar
Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2020). Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068Google Scholar
Slevc, L. R. (2011). Saying what’s on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1503–1514.Google Scholar
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205–246.Google Scholar
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 64–81. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64Google Scholar
Swets, B., Jacovina, M. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Individual differences in the scope of speech planning: evidence from eye-movements. Language and Cognition, 6, 12–44.Google Scholar
Wagner, V., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2010). On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 423–440.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997), Prosodic units in speech production, Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356–381.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, L., Ohlson, N., Ashby, A., & Gator, S. (2013). Lexical availability and grammatical encoding scope during spoken sentence production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1653-1673.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1900). Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache: Mythus und Sitte (Vol. 1). Die Sprache [Language]. Kroner-Engelmann.Google Scholar
References
Alamargot, D., Plane, S., Lambert, E., & Writing, D. (2010.) Using eye and pen movements to trace the development of writing expertise: Case studies of a 7th, 9th and 12th grader, graduate student, and professional writer. Reading and Writing, 23, 853–888. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–009-9191-9Google Scholar
Altemeier, L. E., Abbot, R. D., Berninger, V. W. (2008). Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 30(5), 588–606.Google Scholar
Altemeier, L.E., Jones, J., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Executive functions in becoming writing readers and reading writers: Note taking and report writing in third and fifth graders. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 161–173.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.Google Scholar
Balioussis, C., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2012). Fluency and complexity in children’s writing: The role of mental attention and executive function. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata/Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(3), 33–45.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511269Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W. & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In Butterfield, E. C. (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol. 2. Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). JAI Press.Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique variance. Reading and Writing, 6, 161–196.Google Scholar
Berninger, V., & Winn, W. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In MacArthur, C., Graham, S., and Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp 96– 114). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, R., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writers. Reading and Writing, 4, 257–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01027151Google Scholar
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207599408248175Google Scholar
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 219–227.Google Scholar
Bouriga, S. & Olive, T. (2021). Is typewriting more resources demanding than handwriting in undergraduate students? Reading and Writing, 34, 2227–2255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10137-6Google Scholar
Chenoweth, A., & Hayes, J. (2003). The inner voice in writing. Written Communication, 20, 99–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253572Google Scholar
Cordeiro, C., Limpo, T., Olive, T., & Castro, S. L. (2020). Do executive functions contribute to writing quality in beginning writers? A longitudinal study with second graders. Reading and Writing, 33, 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09963-6Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(1), 1–18Google Scholar
De La Paz, S., Swanson, P. N., & Graham, S. (1998). The contribution of executive control to the revising by students with writing and learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 448–460.Google Scholar
Dedeyan, A., Largy, P., & Negro, I. (2006). Mémoire de travail et détection d’erreurs d’accord verbal : Étude chez le novice et l’expert. [Working memory and detection of verbal agreement errors: A study of novices and experts]. Langages, 164, 57–70.Google Scholar
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750Google Scholar
Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). The contribution of executive functions to narrative writing in fourth grade children. Reading and Writing, 28(7), 989–1011.Google Scholar
Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). How executive functions predict development in syntactic complexity of narrative writing in the upper elementary grades Reading and Writing, 30, 209–231. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9670-8Google Scholar
Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P., (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: A study in French written language. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 437–464,Google Scholar
Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In Gregg, L. W. & Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–49). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In Torrance, M. & Galbraith, D. (Eds.), Studies in writing. Vol. 4. Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D., Ford, S., Walker, G., & Ford, J. (2005). The contribution of different components of working memory to knowledge transformation during writing. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5(2), 113–145.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D., Hallam, J., Olive, T., & Le Bigot, N. (2009). The role of different components of working memory in writing. In Taatgen, N., van Rijn, H., Schomaker, L., & Nerbonne, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3028–3033). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. & Baddeley, A. (1993). Working memory and language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2018) A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2021). Executive control and the writer(s)-within-community model. In Limpo, T. & Olive, T. (Eds.), Executive functions in writing (pp. 38–76). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Olinghouse, N. (2007). Addressing executive function difficulties in writing: An example from the Self-Regulated Strategy Development model. In Meltzer, L. (Ed.), Executive functioning in education: From theory to practice (pp. 216–236). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 23(2), 135–149.https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306286283Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Gregg, L. W. & Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. & Nash, G. J. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. E. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 29–55). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hooper, S. R., Swartz, C. W., Wakely, M. B., de Kruif, R. E. L., & Montgomery, J. W. (2002). Executive functions in elementary school children with and without problems in written expression. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 37–68.Google Scholar
Hooper, S. R., Costa, L., Fernandez, E., Barker, A. Valdes, C, Catlett, S., & Green, M. (2021). Executive functions and writing skills in children and adolescents: Developmental associations and dissociations. In Limpo, T. & Olive, T. (Eds.), Executive functions in writing (139–159). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hupet, M., Fayol, M., & Schelstraete, M.‐A. (1998), Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02673.xGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–71). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Long-term working memory in text production. Memory & Cognition, 29(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195739Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 913–919.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (2004). Working memory components in written sentence generation. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 341–361.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory in written language production. Acta Psychologica, 124, 382–397.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., Turner, C. E., & Cahill, M. (2013). Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model. Journal of Writing research, 5(2), 159–190.Google Scholar
Larigauderie, P., Gaonac’h, D., & Lacroix, N. (1998). Working memory and error detection in texts: What are the role of the central executive and the phonological loop? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 505–527.Google Scholar
Larigauderie, P., Guignouard, C. & Olive, T. (2020). Implication of executive and non-executive components of working memory in detection of typographical, lexical, or grammatical errors. Reading and Writing, 33, 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145–019-10011-6Google Scholar
Le Bigot, N., Passerault, J-M., & Olive, T. (2009). Memory for words location in writing. Psychological Research, 73, 89–97.Google Scholar
Le Bigot, N., Passerault, J-M., & Olive, T. (2010). Le souvenir de la localisation des mots d’un texte [Memory for word location in texts]. L’Année Psychologique, 110, 321–346.Google Scholar
Le Bigot, N., Passerault, J-M., & Olive, T. (2011). Implication of temporal and visuospatial information in memory for words location. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 522–530.Google Scholar
Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (1995). Is writing as difficult as it seems? Memory and Cognition, 23, 767–779. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200928Google Scholar
Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Modelling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 401–413.Google Scholar
Limpo, T., & Olive, T. (Eds.) (2021). Executive functions in writing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madigan, R. J., Johnson, S. E. & Linton, P. W. (1994). Working memory capacity and the writing process. Paper presented at the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Marek, P. & Levy, C. M., (1999). Testing the role of the phonological loop in writing. In Torrance, M. & Jeffery, G. (Eds.), Cognitive demands of writing. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (1988). Functional automaticity in children’s writing: A problem in metacognitive control. Written Communication, 5, 306–324.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (1994). The magical number three, plus or minus two: Working memory in writing. In Carlson, J. S. (Series ed.) & Butterfield, E. C. (Vol. ed.). Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol. 2: Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 1–30). JAI Press.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–325.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychology, 35, 13–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3Google Scholar
McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256–266.Google Scholar
Medimorec, S., & Risko, E. F. (2016). Effects of disfluency in writing. British Journal of Psychology, 107(4), 625–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12177Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar
Olive, T. (2004). Working memory in writing: Empirical evidence from the dual task technique. European Psychologist, 9, 32–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.32Google Scholar
Olive, T. (2011). Working memory in writing. In Berninger, V. W. (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 485–503). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Olive, T. (2021). Executive functions in skilled writing. In Limpo, T. & Olive, T. (Eds.), Executive functions in writing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olive, T., Crouzevialle, M., Le Bigot, N., & Galbraith, D. (2010, September 8–10). Visuospatial working memory in planning. Paper presented at the 2010 Conference of the EARLi SIG-Writing, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high-and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory and Cognition, 30, 594–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194960Google Scholar
Olive, T., Kellogg, R.T., & Piolat, A. (2002). Studying text production with the triple task technique: Why and how? In Olive, T. & Levy, C. M. (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 31–58). Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Olive, T., Kellogg, R. T., & Piolat, A. (2008). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory demands during text composition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 669–687.Google Scholar
Olive, T., & Passerault, (2012). The visuospatial dimension of writing. Written Communication, 29, 326–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451111Google Scholar
Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2002). Processing demands of writing: Effects of suppression of visual feedback in composing and copying a text. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 209–218.Google Scholar
Passerault, J-M. & Dinet, J. (2000). The role of the visuo-spatial sketchpad in the written production of descriptive and argumentative texts. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 3, 31–42.Google Scholar
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort of note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312.Google Scholar
Quinlan, T., Loncke, M., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2012). Coordinating the cognitive processes of writing: The role of the monitor. Written Communication, 29(3), 345–368.Google Scholar
Ransdell, S. E., & Levy, C. M. (1994). Writing as process and product: The impact of tool, genre, audience knowledge and writer expertise. Computers in Human Behavior, 1 0, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(94)90044-2Google Scholar
Raulerson, B. A. III, Donovan, M. J., Whiteford, A. P., & Kellogg, R. T. (2010). Differential verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 229–244.Google Scholar
Roussey, J.-Y., & Piolat, A. (2008). Critical reading effort during text revision. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 765–792.Google Scholar
Shelton, J. R., & Caramazza, A. (2001). The organization of semantic memory. In Rapp, B. (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 423–443). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
St. Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 745–759.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Which components of working memory are important in the writing process? Reading and Writing, 20, 721–752.Google Scholar
Whiteford, P. A., Raulerson, B. A., Michael, D. J., & Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Written language production demands the verbal component more than visual and spatial components of working memory. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(04), 669–687.Google Scholar