Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:25:44.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III.1 - STEM

from Part III - Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2022

Edited by
Harald A. Mieg ,
Elizabeth Ambos ,
Angela Brew ,
Dominique Galli  and
Judith Lehmann
Harald A. Mieg
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Elizabeth Ambos
Affiliation:
Council on Undergraduate Research, Washington DC
Angela Brew
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney
Dominique Galli
Affiliation:
Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis
Judith Lehmann
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research , pp. 189 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bougie, J., Gangopadhyaya, A., Moses, S. L., Polak, R. D., Ramsey, G. P., & Walkosz, W. (2020). A first-year research experience: The Freshman Project in Physics at Loyola University Chicago. American Journal of Physics, 88, 734–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching, 41(5), 555–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, E. L. (2017). Undergraduate research as curriculum. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(4), 287–369.Google Scholar
Hensel, N. (Ed.). (2012). Characteristics of excellence in undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
Hilborn, R. C., Howes, R. H., & Krane, K. S. (Eds.). (2003). Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics: Project report. American Association of Physics Teachers.Google Scholar
Holmes, N. G., & Wieman, C. E. (2016). Examining and contrasting the cognitive activities engaged in undergraduate research experiences and lab courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, 020103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, M., & Bertschinger, E. (2020). The time is now: Systematic changes to increase African Americans with bachelor’s degrees in physics and astronomy. American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
Laursen, S. L. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for measuring student outcomes of undergraduate research. In Churukian, A. D., Jones, D. L., & Ding, L. (Eds.), PERC proceedings (pp. 18–21). American Physical Society.Google Scholar
McKagan, S., Craig, D. A., Jackson, M., & Hodapp, T. (Eds.) (2021). Undergraduate research. In American Physical Society, Effective Practices for Physics Programs (EP3). https://ep3guide.org/guide-overview/undergraduate-research.Google Scholar
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2017). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
NASEM. (2019). The science of effective mentorship in STEM. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Education Association. (2010). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “four Cs.” National Education Association.Google Scholar
Rector, T. A., Puckett, A. W., Wooten, M. M., Vogt, N. P., Coble, K., & Pilachowski, C. A. (2019). Authentic research experiences in astronomy to teach the process of Science. In Impey, C. & Buxner, S. (Eds.), Astronomy education: Evidence-based instruction for introductory courses (Vol. 1, Chapter 7, pp. 1–10). IOP Publishing.Google Scholar
Thiry, H. (2019). What enables persistence? In Seymour, E. & Hunter, A.-B. (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in Undergraduate STEM education. Springer Nature.Google Scholar

References

American Chemical Society (ACS). (n.d.). Undergraduate Research in Chemistry. www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/students/college/research.htmlGoogle Scholar
Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C. M., et al. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
Barnett, K. L., Shea, K. M., McGeough, C., Trotta, K., Williams, S., Ly, M., & Aloisio, K. (2020). Semester-long course-based research project in second-semester organic chemistry: Synthesizing potential lead compounds for the treatment of a neglected tropical disease. Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 1008–1016.Google Scholar
Boyd-Kimball, D., & Miller, K. R. (2018). From cookbook to research: Redesigning an advanced biochemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 62–67.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, V. B., & Berhe, A. A. (2020). Ten simple rules for building an antiracist lab. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(10), e1008210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, T. M., Ricciardo, R., & Weaver, T. (2016). Transitioning from expository laboratory experiments to course-based undergraduate research in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 56–63.Google Scholar
Cruz, C. L., Holmberg-Douglas, N., Onuska, N. P. R., McManus, J. B., MacKenzie, A. A., Hutson, B. L., Eskew, N. A., & Nicewicz, D. A. (2020). Development of a large-enrollment course-based research experience in an undergraduate organic chemistry laboratory: Structure–function relationships in pyrylium photoredox catalysts. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1572–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. N., & Jones, R. M. (2017). Understanding the role of the mentor in developing research competency among undergraduate researchers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25, 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagan, M. K. Jr., Hurtado, S., Chang, M. J., Garcia, G. A., Herrera, F. A., & Garibay, J. C. (2013). Making a difference in science education: The impact of undergraduate research programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 683–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gourley, B. L., & Jones, R. M. (Eds.). (2018). Best practices for supporting and expanding undergraduate research in chemistry. ACS Symposium Series (Vol. 1275). American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341, 1455–1456.Google Scholar
Heemstra, J. M., Waterman, R., Antos, J. M., Beuning, P. J., Bur, S. K., Columbus, L., Feig, A. L., Fuller, A. A., et al. (2017). Throwing away the cookbook: Implementing course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) in chemistry. In Watermann, R. & Feig, A. L. (Eds.), Educational and outreach projects from the Cottrell Scholars collaborative undergraduate and graduate education, Volume 1 (pp. 33–60). ACS Symposium Series (Vol. 1248). American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, S. T., Duncan, A. P., Moy, C. L., & Kirk, S. R. (2020). The value of failure: A student-driven course-based research experience in an undergraduate organic chemistry lab inspired by an unexpected result. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3609–3616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iimoto, D. S., & Frederick, K. A. (2011). Incorporating student-design research projects in the chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1069–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karukstis, K. K. (2008). Broadening participation in undergraduate research. Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 1474–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kean, K. M., van Zee, K., & Mehl, R. A. (2019). Unnatural chemical biology: Research-based laboratory course utilizing genetic code expansion. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(1), 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, M. A., & Yan, F. (2016). Incorporating course-based undergraduate research experiences into analytical chemistry laboratory curricula. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(4), 658–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnel, R. B., Van Wynsberghe, A. W., Rosenstein, I. J., Brewer, K. S., Cotton, M., Shields, G. C., Borton, C. J., Senior, S. Z., et al. (2013). A departmental focus on high impact undergraduate research experiences. In Chapp, T. W. & Benvenuto, M. A. (Eds.), Developing and maintaining a successful undergraduate research program (pp. 5–22). ACS Symposium Series (Vol. 1156). American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), 1261757.Google Scholar
Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297–306.Google Scholar
Multhaup, K. S., Davoli, C. C., Wilson, S. F., Geghman, K. D., Giles, K. G., Martin, J. M. P., & Salter, P. S. (2010). Three models for undergraduate–faculty research: Reflections by a professor and her former students. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 31(1), 21–26.Google Scholar
Mutambuki, J. M., Fynewever, H., Douglass, K., Cobern, W. W., & Obare, S. O. (2019). Integrating authentic research experiences into the quantitative analysis chemistry laboratory course: STEM majors’ self-reported perceptions and experiences. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1591–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student–faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, T. A., Tracy, H. J., & Prudente, C. A. (2006). A research-based laboratory course in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(12), 1844–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, J. K., Jaworski, L., Lopatto, D., & Waterman, R. (2018). An inorganic chemistry laboratory course as research. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(9), 1520–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenbusch, S. E., Hernandez, P. R., Simmons, S. L., Dolan, E. L., & Knight, J. (2016). Early engagement in course-based research increases graduation rates and completion of science, engineering and mathematics degrees. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 15(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Shortlidge, E. E., Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Faculty perspectives on developing and teaching course-based undergraduate research experiences. BioScience, 66(1), 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C. (2010). Stereotype threat: How it affects us and what we can do about it. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. K., & Lagowski, J. J. (2003). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and graduate chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(12), 1362–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, A. M., & Wyllie, G. R. A. (2019). Bioplastics in the general chemistry laboratory: Building a semester-long research experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(4), 668–676.Google Scholar
Williams, L. C., & Reddish, M. J. (2018). Integrating primary research into the teaching lab: Benefits and impacts of a one-semester CURE for physical chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(6), 928–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bell, J. K., Eckdahl, T. T., Hecht, D. A., Killion, P. J., Latzer, J., Mans, T. L., Provost, J. J., Rakus, J. F., et al. (2016). CUREs in biochemistry – Where we are and where we should go. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(1), S7–S12. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. M., Soneral, P. A. G., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). Define your goals before you design a CURE: A call to use backwards design in planning course-based undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i2.1287Google Scholar
Dolan, E. L. (2017). Course-based undergraduate research experiences: Current knowledge and future directions. National Research Council.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. I., Graham, M. J., Sea, P., Betancur, L., Bobrownicki, A., Cresawn, S. G., Garlena, R. A., Jacobs-Sera, D., et al. (2017). An inclusive Research Education Community (iREC): Impact of the SEA–PHAGES program on research outcomes and student learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(51), 13531–13536. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718188115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, L. (1998). Forschendes Lehren und Lernen – Eine aktuelle Notwendigkeit. Das Hochschulwesen, 46, H. 1, 3–10.Google Scholar
Lopatto, D., Alvarez, C., Barnard, D., Chandrasekaran, C., Chung, H. M., Du, C., Eckdahl, T., Goodman, A. L., et al. (2008). Undergraduate research. Genomics Education Partnership. Science, 322(5902), 684–685. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165351Google Scholar
Lopatto, D., Rosenwald, A., DiAngelo, J., Hark, A., Skerritt, M., Wawersik, M., Allen, A. K., Alvarez, C., et al. (2020). Facilitating growth through frustration: Using genomics research in a course-based undergraduate research experience. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/JMBE.V21I1.2005Google Scholar
Mieg, H. A. (2019). Forms of research with strategies for implementing undergraduate research. Journal for Higher Education Development (ZfHE), 14(1), 79–94.Google Scholar
Murren, C. J., Wolyniak, M. J., Rutter, M. T., Bisner, A. M., Callahan, H. S., Strand, A. E., & Corwin, L. A. (2019). Undergraduates phenotyping Arabidopsis knockouts in a course-based undergraduate research experience: Exploring plant fitness and vigor using quantitative phenotyping methods. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v20i2.1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Science Education Resource Center. (2017). CUREnet: Course-based undergraduate research experience. Retrieved March, 12, 2020, from https://serc.carleton.edu/curenet/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Seeling, J. M., & Choudhary, M. (2016). Professional practices in undergraduate research programs. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i2.982CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelby, S. J. (2019). A course‐based undergraduate research experience in biochemistry that is suitable for students with various levels of preparedness. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21227Google Scholar
Tennial, R. E., Solomon, E. D., Hammonds-Odie, L., McDowell, G. S., Moore, M., Roca, A. I., & Marcette, J. (2019). Formation of the Inclusive Environments and Metrics in Biology Education and Research (iEMBER) Network: Building a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion. CBE–Life Science Education, 3(1), 18:mr1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-03-004Google Scholar
Wei, C. A., & Woodin, T. (2011). Undergraduate research experiences in biology: Alternatives to the apprenticeship model. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 123–131.Google Scholar

References

Diamantopoulos, J. C. D., Dorff, M., & Richardson, S. (2014). How much undergraduate research in mathematics is being done? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 61(4), 384–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorff, M., Henrich, A., & Pudwell, L. (2017). Successfully mentoring undergraduates in research: A how to guide for mathematicians. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 27(3), 320–336.Google Scholar
Dorff, M., Henrich, A., & Pudwell, L. (2019). A mathematician’s practical guide to mentoring undergraduate research. MAA Press: An Imprint of the American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorff, M., & Weekes, S. (2019). A student research course on data analytics problems from industry – PIC Math. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research (SPUR), 2(4), 37–42.Google Scholar
Gallian, J. A. (2012). Undergraduate research in mathematics has come of age. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 59(8), 1113–1114.Google Scholar
Gallian, J. A. (2015). A history of undergraduate research in mathematics. In Kennedy, S. F. (Ed.), A century of advancing mathematics (pp. 263–274). Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
Highlander, H. C. (2017). Keys to successful mentoring of undergraduate research teams with an emphasis in applied mathematics research. Letters in Biomathematics, 4(1), 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, K. (2008). Adventures in academic year undergraduate research. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 55(11), 1422–1426.Google Scholar
Narayan, D. A. (Ed.). (2014). Trends in undergraduate research in the mathematical sciences (Chicago, 2012), Involve, 7(3, special issue). Available at http://msp.org/involve/2014/7-3/.Google Scholar
Wootton, A., Peterson, V., & Lee, C. (Eds.). (2018). A primer for undergraduate research: From groups and tiles to frames and vaccines. Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

References

Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology and Human Values, 39(1), 42–72.Google Scholar
Dolan, E. L., & Johnson, D. (2010). The undergraduate–postgraduate–faculty triad: Unique functions and tensions associated with undergraduate research experiences at research universities. Cell Biology Education, 9, 543–553.Google ScholarPubMed
Downey, G., & Lucena, J. C. (2003). When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 168–176.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. M. F., Peixoto, Z. M. A., Fernandes, F. O. P., e Silva, L. S., Carneiro, C. A., & da Silva Martins, C. A. P. (2019). University–industry partnership as a teaching–learning strategy. IEEE Potentials, 38(6), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J. K. (2001). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey, E. (2014). Understanding disciplinary cultures: The first step to cultural change. In Johri, A. & Olds, B. M. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 437–455). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A. (2009). Hitting the brakes. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. G. (2020). Engineering ethics. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jungmann, T. (2019). Inquiry-based learning in the engineering sciences. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 205–216). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotys-Schwartz, D., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Shuman, L. (2011). Informal learning in engineering education. Proceedings – IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1–7.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2018). Engineering justice. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270–277.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Dori, Y. J., & Kuldell, N. H. (2011). Experiential engineering through iGEM – An undergraduate summer competition in synthetic biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 156–160.Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering. (2016). Infusing ethics into the development of engineers. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering. (2017). Grand challenges for engineering. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. (2022). Research experiences for undergraduates (REU). Retrieved January 25, 2022, from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2019/nsf19582/nsf19582.htmGoogle Scholar
Powers, K., Chen, H. L., Prasad, K. V., Gilmartin, S. K., & Sheppard, S. (2018). Exploring how engineering internships and undergraduate research experiences inform and influence college students’ career decisions and future plans. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social justice. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society, 3(1), 1–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. (2018). Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534.Google Scholar
Smith, J. M. (2021). Extracting accountability: engineers and corporate social responsibility. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tonso, K. L. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering. Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinck, D. (Ed.). (2003). Everyday engineering. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Wade, H. (2013). National Instruments and the University of Manchester: A strategic partnership for engineering education. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 50(3), 304–315.Google Scholar
Wyatt, S. (2008). Technological determinism is dead: Long live technological determinism. In Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M. E., and Wajcman, J. (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed. (pp. 165–80). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, C. D. (2018). “I just love research”: Beliefs about what makes researchers successful. Social Epistemology, 32(4), 262–271.Google Scholar
Wylie, C. D. (2019). Socialization through stories of disaster in engineering laboratories. Social Studies of Science, 49(6), 817–838.Google Scholar
Wylie, C. D. (2021). The epistemic importance of novices: How undergraduate students contribute to engineering laboratory communities. In Kastenhofer, K. & Molyneux-Hodgson, S. (Eds.), Community and identity in contemporary technosciences, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 31 (pp. 145–162). Springer.Google Scholar
Wylie, C. D., & Gorman, M. E. (2018). Learning in laboratories: How undergraduates participate in engineering research. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
Wylie, C. D., Kim, S. J., Linville, I., & Campo, A. (2019). Graduate/undergraduate partnerships (GradUP): How graduate and undergraduate students learn research skills together. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ley, C., & Bordas, S. P. A. (2018). What makes data science different? A discussion involving statistics2.0 and computational sciences. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 6(3), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Envisioning the data science discipline: The undergraduate perspective: Interim report. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, J., McConville, K., Addona, V., Tintle, N., & Pearl, D. (2020). Mentoring undergraduate research in statistics: Reaping the benefits and overcoming the barriers. Journal of Statistics Education, 28(2), 140–153. doi: 10.1080/10691898.2020.1756542Google Scholar
Yavuz, F., & Ward, M. (2018). Fostering undergraduate data science. The American Statistician, 74(1), 8–16.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • STEM
  • Edited by Harald A. Mieg, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Elizabeth Ambos, Angela Brew, Macquarie University, Sydney, Dominique Galli, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Judith Lehmann, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
  • Online publication: 11 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869508.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • STEM
  • Edited by Harald A. Mieg, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Elizabeth Ambos, Angela Brew, Macquarie University, Sydney, Dominique Galli, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Judith Lehmann, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
  • Online publication: 11 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869508.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • STEM
  • Edited by Harald A. Mieg, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Elizabeth Ambos, Angela Brew, Macquarie University, Sydney, Dominique Galli, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Judith Lehmann, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
  • Online publication: 11 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869508.024
Available formats
×