Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Theory and Research on Undergraduate Research
- Part II Implementation, Approaches, Methods
- Part III Disciplines
- 17 Introduction
- Part III.1 STEM
- Part III.2 Health
- Part III.3 Social Sciences
- Part III.4 Humanities
- Part III.5 Arts & Design
- Part III.6 Disciplines A–Z
- Part IV International Perspective
- Part V Avenues for Developing Undergraduate Research
- Index
- References
Part III.6 - Disciplines A–Z
from Part III - Disciplines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Theory and Research on Undergraduate Research
- Part II Implementation, Approaches, Methods
- Part III Disciplines
- 17 Introduction
- Part III.1 STEM
- Part III.2 Health
- Part III.3 Social Sciences
- Part III.4 Humanities
- Part III.5 Arts & Design
- Part III.6 Disciplines A–Z
- Part IV International Perspective
- Part V Avenues for Developing Undergraduate Research
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research , pp. 379 - 380Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools have lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.Google ScholarPubMed
The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. The State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Butler, N., Delaney, H., & Spoelstra, S. (2015). Problematizing ‘relevance’ in the business school: The case of leadership studies. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Frankiewicz, B. (2019, January 14). Does higher education still prepare people for jobs? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/01/does-higher-education-still-prepare-people-for-jobsGoogle Scholar
Charles, M. (2018). Teaching, in spite of excellence: Recovering a practice of teaching-led research. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinebell, S. K., & Clinebell, J. M. (2008). The tension in business education between academic rigor and real-world relevance: The role of executive professors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.Google Scholar
Harland, T. (2016). Teaching to enhance research. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvard Business School. (2020). The HBS Case Method. www.hbs.edu/mba/academic-experience/Pages/the-hbs-case-method.aspxGoogle Scholar
Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. The Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
Lambert, H. (2019, August 21). The great university con: How the British degree lost its value. New Statesman America. www.newstatesman.com/politics/education/2019/08/great-university-con-how-british-degree-lost-its-valueGoogle Scholar
MacLean, D., MacIntosh, R., & Grant, S. (2002). Mode 2 management research. British Journal of Management, 13(3), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, V. W., & Harvey, W. S. (2018). How preferable and possible is management research-led teaching impact? Management Learning, 49(3), 363–373.Google Scholar
Moules, J. (2019, November 4). Business is most popular degree subject in UK universities. Financial Times. www.ft.com/content/2cc17ae4-fbe4-11e9-a354-36acbbb0d9b6Google Scholar
REF2021 (2019a). Research excellence framework: Index of revisions to the “guidance on submissions” (2019/01). UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). www.ref.ac.uk/media/1092/ref-2019_01-guidance-on-submissions.pdfGoogle Scholar
REF2021 (2019b). Research excellence framework. Panel criteria and working methods. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). www.ref.ac.uk/media/1084/ref-2019_02-panel-criteria-and-working-methods.pdfGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weybrecht, G. (2013). Ethics and service learning at European Business School in Germany. PRiMEtime. https://primetime.unprme.org/2013/06/17/ethics-and-service-learning-at-european-business-school-in-germany/Google Scholar
References
Arhar, J., Holly, M., & Kasten, W. (2001). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Association for Childhood Education International. (2011). ACEI global guidelines (GGA) [manual] (3rd ed.). https://ceintl.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/GGAenglish.pdfGoogle Scholar
Boone, V., Bell, S., Buster, T., Hart, F., & Delacruz, S. (2019). Coding in early childhood education. Paper presented at the National Conference on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
Brew, A., & Mantai, L. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the challenges and barriers to implementing research-based experiences for undergraduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1273216Google Scholar
Britto, P. R., Engle, P. L., & Super, C. M. (2012). Handbook of early childhood development research and its impact on global policy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cerbin, B. (2011). Lesson study: Using classroom inquiry to improve teaching and learning in higher education. Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, K., Fiedler, C., Flesher, B., Oates, E., DeVore, S., & Miolo, G. (2015). Older adults’ participation in an intergenerational reading program: Benefits and challenges. Paper presented at the University of Wisconsin System Undergraduate Research Symposium.Google Scholar
DeVore, S., & Munk, D. (2015). Undergraduate research in teacher education: A rationale for broader program engagement. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 35(4), 12–17. www.cur.org/publications/curq_on_the_web/Google Scholar
Heimer, L., Caya, L., Lancaster, P., Saxon, L., & Wildman, C. G. E. R. (2019). Nations within a nation: Cross-cultural field insights in an Anishinaabe context. Global Education Review, 6(3), 65–83.Google Scholar
Ivankova, N. V. (2015). Mixed methods applications in action research: From methods to community action. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2017). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and application (Classic edition). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamerman, S. (2006). A global history of early childhood education and care. Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, Strong foundations: Early childhood care and education. UNESCO.Google Scholar
Khales, B. M. (2015). Reflection through story: Strengthening Palestinian early childhood education. In Kroll, L. R. & Meier, D. R. (Eds.), Educational change in international early childhood contexts: Crossing borders of reflection (pp. 174–187). Routledge.Google Scholar
Macy, M., & Bricker, D. (2006). Practical applications for using curriculum-based assessment to create embedded learning opportunities for young children. Young Exceptional Children, 9(4), 12–21.Google Scholar
Madrid Akpovo, S., Moran, M. J., & Brookshire, R. (Eds.). (2018). Collaborative cross-cultural research methodologies in early care and education contexts. Routledge.Google Scholar
Manak, J. M., & Young, G. (2014, winter). Incorporating undergraduate research into teacher education: Preparing thoughtful teachers through inquiry-based learning. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 35, 35–38.Google Scholar
Moon, B. (Ed.). (2012). Teacher education and the challenge of development: A global analysis. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, L. S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge.Google Scholar
Pelton, R. P. (2010). Action research for teacher candidates: Using classroom data to enhance instruction. Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
Pence, A. R. (1998). Reconceptualizing ECCD in the majority world: One minority world perspective. International Journal of Early Childhood, 30(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185631Google Scholar
Råde, A. (2014). Final thesis models in European teacher education and their orientation towards the academy and the teaching profession. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.858692Google Scholar
Rhoades, M. (2016). “Little pig, little pig, let me come in!” Animating the Three Little Pigs with preschoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(6), 595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643–015-0743-0Google Scholar
Sánchez-Blanco, C. (2015). Learning about democracy at school: An action research project in early childhood education. Educational Action Research, 23(4), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1025801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R. M., Alfaya, E. G., & Garcia, M. A. O. (2015). RIECU: The early childhood education-centre for teachers–university network. Analysis of children’s learning achievements through the project approach/RIECU: Red de Infantil escuela-centro de profesorado-universidad. Analisis del aprendizaje de los ninos a traves del metodo de proyectos. Inicio, 7(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i1.553Google Scholar
Shallwani, S. (2015). Why I use the term “Majority world” instead of “developing countries” or “Third world”. Early childhood development: Research perspectives on research and practice in early childhood development and education – in Canada, Pakistan, and other global contexts. https://sadafshallwani.net/2015/08/04/majority-world/Google Scholar
Shonkoff, J. P. E., & Meisels, S. J. E. (2000). Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone-MacDonald, A., Wendell, K., Douglass, A., & Lovel, M. L. (2015). Engaging young engineers: Teaching problem-solving skills through STEM. Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Taylor, L., & Pillets, S. (2010). Action research and the early childhood educator In Pelton, R. P. (Ed.), Action research for teacher candidates (pp. 93–110). Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
United Nations Division for Sustainable Development Goals. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals, Knowledge Platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgsGoogle Scholar
Vidal, A., Gomes, V., & Berbat, M. (2015). The encounter of knowledge among children, childhoods and ways of seeing and living the geographic space. Revista Brasileira de Educação em Geografia, 5(9), 87–102.Google Scholar
Zeichner, K. (2002). Educational action research. In Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 273–283). Sage.Google Scholar
Zimbardi, K., & Myatt, P. (2014). Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: A cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.651448Google Scholar
References
Arrowsmith, C., Bagoly-Simó, P., Finchum, A., Oda, K., & Pawson, E. (2011). The implications of student employability for the design of geography curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(3), 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagoly-Simó, P., & Uhlenwinkel, A. (2017). Germany: The need for rigorous conceptualization of progression. In Muñiz Solari, O., Solem, M., & Boehm, R. (Eds.), Learning progressions in geography education. An international perspective (pp. 19–33). Springer.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, D., Arunachalam, D., & Licina, D. (2012). “It feels more important than other classes I have done”: An “authentic” undergraduate research experience in sociology. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 129–142.Google Scholar
Daniels, J., & Brooker, J. (2014). Student identity development in higher education: Implications for graduate attributes and work-readiness. Educational Research, 56, 65–76.Google Scholar
Garde-Hansen, J., & Calvert, B. (2007). Developing a research culture in the undergraduate curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 105–116.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Loy, K., & Banow, R. (2018). Can first-year undergraduate geography students do individual research? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(3), 412–426.Google Scholar
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
Hill, J., & Walkington, H. (2016). Developing graduate attributes through participation in undergraduate research conferences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J., West, H., & Kneale, P. (2018a). Preparing for multi-disciplinary undergraduate research conferences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 148–156.Google Scholar
Hill, J., West, H., & Kneale, P. (2018b). Making the most of multi-disciplinary undergraduate research conferences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(2), 311–316.Google Scholar
Houser, C., Cahill, A., & Lemmons, K. (2014). Assessment of student and faculty mentor perceptions of an international undergraduate research program in physical geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(4), 582–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. American Association of Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, R. (2015, August 13). The Guardian view on geography: It’s the must-have A-level. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/13/the-guardian-view-on-geography-its-the-must-have-a-levelGoogle Scholar
Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N., Leach, J., Davis, L., & Orthia, L. (2010). Students publishing in new media: Eight hypotheses – a house of cards? International Journal of Innovation Science and Mathematics, 18(1), 43–54.Google Scholar
Shanahan, J. O., Walkington, H., Ackley, E., Hall, E., & Stewart, K. (2017). Award winning mentors see democratization as the future of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 37(4), 4–11.Google Scholar
Shobe, H., & Banis, D. (2010). Music regions and mental maps: Teaching cultural geography. Journal of Geography, 109(2), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solís, P., Hunyh, N. T., Carpenter, D., Adames de Newbill, M., & Ojeda, L. (2017). Using an authentic project based learning framework to support integrated geography education linked to standards and geospatial competencies. Research in Geographic Education, 19(2), 36–65.Google Scholar
Tian, J., Ren, C., Lei, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). Designing MATLAB course for undergraduates in cartography and geographic information science: Linking research and teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–44.Google Scholar
Walkington, H. (2008). Geoverse: Piloting a national journal of undergraduate research in geography. Planet, 20, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkington, H. (2012). Developing dialogic learning space: The case of online undergraduate research journals. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(4), 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkington, H. (2019). Developing and integrating a student–researcher pedagogy within the geography curriculum. In Walkington, H., Hill, J., & Dyer, S. (Eds.), Handbook for teaching and learning in geography (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Walkington, H., & Jenkins, A. (2008). Embedding undergraduate research publication in the student learning experience: Ten suggested strategies. Brookes E-journal of Learning and Teaching, 2(3).Google Scholar
Walkington, H., Griffin, A., Keys-Amthews, L., Metoyer, S., Miller, W., Baker, R., & France, D. (2011). Embedding research-based learning early in the undergraduate geography curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(3), 315–330.Google Scholar
Walkington, H., Hall, E., Shanahan, J. O., Ackley, E., & Stewart, K. (2018). Striving for excellence in undergraduate research mentoring: The challenges and approaches to the salient practices. In Vandermaas-Peeler, M., Miller, P. C.. & Moore, J. (Eds.), Excellence in mentoring undergraduate research (pp. 105–129). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 393–409.Google Scholar
References
Ambrosio, T. (2006). Trying Saddam Hussein: Teaching international law through an undergraduate mock trial. International Studies Perspectives, 7, 159–171.Google Scholar
Broemel, R., & Muthorst, O. (2019). Inquiry-based learning in legal studies. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research. The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 301–309). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar
Cappa, C. (2004). A model for the integration of legal research into Australian undergraduate law curricula. Legal Education Review, 14(2), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. (2016). Smarter law learning: Using cognitive science to maximize law learning. Capital University Law Review, 44, 551–590.Google Scholar
Craven, R. (2020). Socio-legal studies and economics. In Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., & McConnachie, K. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods (pp. 179–192). Routledge.Google Scholar
Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., & McConnachie, K. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods. Routledge.Google Scholar
Dauner-Lieb, B. (2012). Teaching research and research-based learning in law studies. In Hof, H. & Götz von Olenhusen, P. (Eds.), Rechtsgestaltung, Rechtskritik, Konkurrenzen (pp. 138–152). Nomos.Google Scholar
Funke, A. (2018). Rezeption durch Gerichte. Die „normative” Dimension rechtswissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung [Reception by courts. The “normative” dimension of legal theory formation]. In Marsch, N., Münkler, L., & Wischmeyer, T. (Eds.), Apokryphe Schriften. (pp. 31–46). Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 614–631.Google Scholar
Hervey, T., & Wood, J. (2016). “Now I understand what you were trying to do, I see this was the best module I had at University”: Student learning expectations reviewed eight years later. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22(3). http://webjcli.org/index.php/webjcli/article/view/505/686Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2020). Feminist approaches to socio-legal studies. In Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., & McConnachie, K. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods (pp. 260–272). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. (2008). Developing legal research skills: Expanding the paradigm. Melbourne University Law Review, 32, 1065–1095.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. (2017). Doctrinal research: Researching the jury. In Watkins, D. & Burton, M. (Eds.), Research methods in law (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Listokin, Y. (2019). Law and microeconomics: Legal remedies to recessions. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McConnachie, K. (2020). Law and anthropology. In Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., & McConnachie, K. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods (pp. 193–205). Routledge.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A. (2017). Research-informed teaching: A clinical approach. The Law Teacher, 51(1), 40–55.Google Scholar
Oelkers, J., & Kraus, P. A. (2014). Problembasiertes Lernen (PBL) in der rechtswissenschaftlichen Lehre [Problem-based learning (PBL) in law teaching]. ZDRW, 1(2), 142–149.Google Scholar
Poiares Pessoa Maduro, L. M. (2007). Interpreting European law: Judicial adjudication in a context of constitutional pluralism. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2). https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/7707Google Scholar
Riley, S. (2015). Developing an animal law case book: Knowledge transfer and service learning from student-generated materials. Legal Education Review, 25(1), 251–270.Google Scholar
Ringel, L. S. (2004). Designing a moot court: What to do, what not to do, and suggestions for how to do it. Political Science and Politics, 37, 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach Anleu, S., & Mack, K. (2020). Law and sociology. In Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., & McConnachie, K. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods (pp. 149–161). Routledge.Google Scholar
Smits, Jan (2015). What is legal doctrine? On the aims and methods of legal-dogmatic research. Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper No 2015/06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, M. J. (2017). Teaching consumer law based on PBL principles within a workshop frame. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 39–47.Google Scholar
Sylvester, C. (2015). More questions than answers? A review of the effectiveness of inquiry based learning in higher education. Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 10(1), 21–29.Google Scholar
Teitelbaum, J., & Zeiler, K. (2018). Research handbook on behavioral law and economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Waters, B. (2016). “A part to play”: The value of role-play simulation in undergraduate legal education. The Law Teacher, 50(2), 172–194.Google Scholar
Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M. M., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M., & van der Molen, H. (2016). Comparing problem-based learning students to students in a lecture-based curriculum: Learning strategies and the relation with self-study time. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32, 431–447.Google Scholar
Wren, C. G., & Wren, J. R. (1988). The teaching of legal research. Law Library Journal, 80, 7–61.Google Scholar
Zamir, E., & Teichman, D. (2018). Behavioral law and economics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Adam, N., Zosky, D. L., & Unrau, Y. A. (2004). Improving the research climate in social work curricula: Clarifying learning expectations across BSW and MSW research courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(3–4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v24n03_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. J., & Isokuortti, N. (2016). A framework for teaching practice-based research with a focus on service users. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 36(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2016.1129931Google Scholar
Austin, M. J., Dal Santo, T. S., & Lee, C. (2012). Building organizational supports for research-minded practitioners. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 9(1–2), 174–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2012.636327Google Scholar
Berger, R. (2002). Teaching research in practice courses. Social Work Education, 21(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470220136911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, P. J., & Este, D. C. (2008). Engaging students in social work research education. Social Work Education, 27(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470701380006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Association of Social Workers (CASW). (2005). Code of ethics. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Social Workers. www.casw-acts.ca/sites/default/files/attachements/casw_code_of_ethics.pdfGoogle Scholar
Canadian Association for Social Work Education (CASWE). (2014). Standards for Accreditation. https://caswe-acfts.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/CASWE-ACFTS.Standards-11-\2014-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Curtis, K., Fry, M., Shaban, R. Z., & Considine, J. (2017). Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(5–6), 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13586Google Scholar
Earley, M. A. (2014). A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860105Google Scholar
Epstein, I. (1996). In quest of a research-based model for clinical practice: Or, why can’t a social worker be more like a researcher? Social Work Research, 20(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/20.2.97Google Scholar
Frampton, N. M. A., Jenney, A., & Shaw, J. (2020). Implementation of practice-based research in social work education. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 4, 96–100.Google Scholar
Fraser, M. W., Lewis, R. E., & Norman, J. L. (1991). Research education in MSW programs: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 4(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v04n02_07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freymond, N., Morgenshtern, M., Duffie, M., Hong, L., Bugeja-Freitas, S., & Eulenberg, J. (2014). Mapping MSW research training. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(3), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.912998Google Scholar
Gambrill, E. (2007). Views of evidence-based practice: Social workers’ code of ethics and accreditation standards as guides for choice. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(3), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2007.200600639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilgun, J. F. (2005). The four cornerstones of evidence-based practice in social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504269581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. G., Bretzin, A., Leininger, C., & Stauffer, R. (2001). Research learning attributes of graduate students in social work, psychology, and business. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2001.10779058Google Scholar
Hardcastle, D. A., & Bisman, C. D. (2003). Innovations in teaching social work research. Social Work Education, 22(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470309131Google Scholar
Harder, J. (2010). Overcoming MSW students’ reluctance to engage in research. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841231003705404Google Scholar
Harrison, D. F., & Thyer, B. A. (1988). Doctoral research on social work practice: A proposed agenda. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1988.10672104Google Scholar
Hewson, J. A., Walsh, C. A., & Bradshaw, C. (2010). Enhancing social work research education through research field placements. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(9), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v3i9.230Google Scholar
Jaynes, S. (2014). Using principles of practice-based research to teach evidence-based practice in social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11(1–2), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2013.850327Google Scholar
Knee, R. T. (2002). Can service learning enhance student understanding of social work research? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22(1–2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v22n01_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwong, K. (2017). Advancing social work practice research education – An innovative, experiential pedagogical approach. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p1Google Scholar
Lazar, A. (1991). Faculty, practitioner, and student attitudes toward research. Journal of Social Work Education, 27(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1991.10672167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, G., & Paul, S. (2013). Teaching research in social work: Capacity and challenge. British Journal of Social Work, 43(4), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs010Google Scholar
Maschi, T., Wells, M., Yoder Slater, G., MacMillan, T., & Ristow, J. (2013). Social work students’ research-related anxiety and self-efficacy: Research instructors’ perceptions and teaching innovations. Social Work Education, 32(6), 800–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.695343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrystal, P., & Wilson, G. (2009). Research training and professional social work education: Developing research‐minded practice. Social Work Education, 28(8), 856–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470802672962Google Scholar
Mehić, B. (2011). Translational research in medicine. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 11(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2011.2583Google Scholar
Orme, J., & Powell, J. (2008). Building research capacity in social work: Process and issues. British Journal of Social Work, 38(5), 988–1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm122Google Scholar
Rubin, D., Valutis, S., & Robinson, B. (2010). Social work education and student research projects: A survey of program directors. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800040Google Scholar
Secret, M., Ford, J., & Rompf, E. L. (2003). Undergraduate research courses: A closer look reveals complex social work student attitudes. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2003.10779146Google Scholar
Schmidt-Wenzel, A., & Rubel, K. (2017). Inquiry-based learning in social work. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research. The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 139–148). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. M., & Vinjamuri, M. K. (2014). Activating adult-learning principles through small groups in preparing social work students to achieve CSWE research competencies. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(4), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.937890Google Scholar
Teater, B. (2017). Social work research and its relevance to practice: “The gap between research and practice continues to be wide.” Journal of Social Service Research, 43(5), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1340393Google Scholar
Uggerhøj, L. (2011). What is practice research in social work – Definitions, barriers and possibilities. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 45–59.Google Scholar
Vinjamuri, M., Warde, B., & Kolb, P. (2017). The reflective diary: An experiential tool for enhancing social work students’ research learning. Social Work Education, 36(8), 933–945.Google Scholar
Walsh, C. A., Casselman, P. J., Hickey, J., Lee, N., & Pliszka, H. (2015). Engaged in research/achieving balance: A case example of teaching research to Masters of Social Work students. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 8(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i2.9142Google Scholar
Walsh, C. A., Gulbrandsen, C., & Lorenzetti, L. (2019). Research practicum: An experiential model for social work research. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M., Maschi, T., & Slater, G. Y. (2012). Integration of research and practice: Innovations and challenges in social work programs. Social Work Education, 31(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.551827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Barth, M. (2009). Assessment of key competencies – A conceptual framework. In: Adomssent, M., Barth, M., & Beringer, A. (Eds.), World in transition: Sustainability perspectives for higher education (pp. 93–100). VAS Verlag. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2170811Google Scholar
Barth, M. (2014). Implementing sustainability in higher education: Learning in an age of transformation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Benton-Short, L., & Merrigan, K. A. (2016). Beyond interdisciplinary: How sustainability creates opportunities for pan-university efforts. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(2), 387–398.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, P., Huss-Lederman, S., & Deering, B. (2018). Using the SENCER approach in collaborating across disciplines: Participating in Do Now U. Science Education and Civic Engagement: An International Journal, 10(2), 5–10.Google Scholar
Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D. J., & Von Wehrden, H. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1–15.Google Scholar
Clark, S. G., Steen-Adams, M. M., Pfirman, S., & Wallace, R. L. (2011) Professional development of interdisciplinary environmental scholars. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1(2), 99–113.Google Scholar
Cotton, D., Bailey, I., Warren, M., & Bissell, S. (2009). Revolutions and second‐best solutions: Education for sustainable development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadeeva, Z., & Mochizuki, Y. (2010). Higher education for today and tomorrow: University appraisal for diversity, innovation and change towards sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 5, 249–256.Google Scholar
Focht, W. J., Reiter, M. A., Barresi, P. A., & Smardon, R. C. (Eds.) (2019). Education for sustainable human and environmental systems: From theory to practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fortuin, K. P. J., van Koppen, C. S. A., & Kroeze, C. (2013). The contribution of systems analysis to training students in cognitive interdisciplinary skills in environmental science education. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 3(2), 139–152.Google Scholar
Holmberg, J., & Samuelsson, B. E. (Eds.) (2006). Drivers and barriers for implementing sustainable development in higher education. Education for Sustainable Development in Action, Technical Paper No. 3. UNESCO.Google Scholar
Junyent, M., & Geli de Ciurana, A. M. (2008). Education for sustainability in university studies: A model for reorienting the curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 763–782.Google Scholar
Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B. et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.Google Scholar
Koehn, P. H., & Uitto, J. I. (2014). Evaluating sustainability education: Lessons from international development experience. Higher Education, 67(5), 621–635.Google Scholar
Lambrechts, W., & Ceulemans, K. (2013). Sustainability assessment in higher education: Evaluating the use of the auditing instrument for sustainability in higher education (AISHE) in Belgium. In Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Filho, W. L. (Eds.), Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions (pp. 157–174). Springer.Google Scholar
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(supplement 1), 25–43.Google Scholar
Lozano, R. (2006). A tool for a graphical assessment of sustainability in universities (GASU). Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 963–972.Google Scholar
Lozano, R., & Watson, M. K. (2013). Assessing sustainability in university curricula: Case studies from the University of Leeds and the Georgia Institute of Technology. In Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Filho, W. L. (Eds.), Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions (pp. 359–373). Springer.Google Scholar
Miller, T. R., Muñoz-Erickson, T., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Transforming knowledge for sustainability: Towards adaptive academic institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(2), 177–192.Google Scholar
Moore, J. (2005). Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level: A guide for change agents. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 326–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfirman, S. (Ed.) (2011). Interdisciplinary hiring and career development: Guidance for individuals and institutions. National Council for Science and the Environment.Google Scholar
Roorda, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Assessment and certification of higher education for sustainable development. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 1(1), 41–56.Google Scholar
Shriberg, M. (2002). Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 153–167.Google Scholar
Vincent, S., & Focht, W. (2010). In search of common ground: Exploring identity and core competencies for interdisciplinary environmental programs. Environmental Practice, 12(1), 76–86.Google Scholar
Vincent, S., Roberts, J. T., & Mulkey, S. (2016). Interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability education: Islands of progress in a sea of dysfunction. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(2), 418–424.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Kay, B. (2015). Learning while transforming: Solution-oriented learning for urban sustainability in Phoenix, Arizona. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 29–36.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., Bernstein, M. J., Laubichler, M., Caniglia, G., Minteer, B., & Lang, D. J. (2013). A global classroom for international sustainability education. Creative Education, 4(4), 19.Google Scholar
References
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Spann, H. (2018). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht. Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
Alvunger, D., & Wahlström, N. (2018). Research-based teacher education? Exploring the meaning potentials of Swedish teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 332–349.Google Scholar
Baan, J., Gaikhorst, L., van ‘t Noordende, J., & Volman, M. (2019). The involvement in inquiry-based working of teachers of research-intensive versus practically oriented teacher education programmes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84(8), 74–82.Google Scholar
BERA (British Educational Research Association). (2014). Research and the teaching profession: Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. Final report of the BERA–RSA inquiry into the role of research in teacher education. BERA–RSA.Google Scholar
Borko, H., Carlson, J., Mangram, C., Anderson, R., Fong, A., Million, S., Mozenter, S., & Villa, A. (2017). The role of video-based discussion in model for preparing professional development leaders. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(29), 1–15.Google Scholar
Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1–11.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M., Barnatt, J., Friedman, A., & Pine, G. (2009). Inquiry on inquiry: Practitioner research and student learning. Action in Teacher Education, 31(2), 17–32.Google Scholar
Cordingley, P. (2013). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Research and teacher education: The BERA–RSA inquiry. BERA–RSA.Google Scholar
Crowe, M., & Brakke, D. (2019). Assessing undergraduate research experiences: An annotative bibliography. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 3(2) 21–30.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
DeVore, S., & Munk, D. (2015). Undergraduate research in teacher education: A rationale for broader engagement. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 35(4), 12–17.Google Scholar
Eklund, G. (2014). A research-based teacher education in Finland – A dilemma for the students. Psychology Research, 4(7), 567–578.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2015). Shaping career-long perspectives on teaching. A guide on policies to improve initial teacher education. http://omk-obrazovanje.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/initial-teacher-education_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fichten, W. (2019). Inquiry-based learning in teacher training. In Mieg, H. A. (Ed.), Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience (pp. 129–137). Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar
Gerheim, U. (2018). Ideal und Ambivalenz – Herausforderungen für Lehrende in Prozess des Forschenden Lehrens und Lernens. In Lehmann, J. & Mieg, H. (Eds.), Forschendes Lernen. Ein Praxisbuch (pp. 412–428). Verlag der Fachhochschule Potsdam.Google Scholar
Gerheim, U. (2019). Forschendes Lehren und Lernen in der Lehrer_innenbildung: Ambivalenzmuster und Ablaufstörungen aus der Perspektive von Studierenden. In Schiefner-Rohs, M., Favella, G., & Hermann, A.-C. (Eds.), Forschungsnahes Lernen Lehren und Lernen in der Lehrer*innenbildung. Forschungsmethodische Zugänge und Modelle zur Umsetzung (pp. 211–228). Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Gerholz, K.-H., Ciolek, S., & Schlottmann, P. (2020). Linking theory and practice through university schools: An empirical study of effective learning design patterns. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 15(2), 147–166.Google Scholar
Gomez, M. (2013). Incorporating undergraduate research methods topics into a content based course: A preliminary case study. Insights to a Changing World Journal, (3), 69–81.Google Scholar
Harris, K., Williams-Johnson, M., & Sparkman, D. (2018). Innovation in preservice teacher preparation: Undergraduate research in special education. Journal of Transformative Learning, 5(2), 16–27.Google Scholar
Huber, L. (2006). Forschendes Lernen in deutschen Hochschulen. Zum Stand der Diskussion. In Obolenski, A. & Meyer, H. (Eds.), Forschendes Lernen. Theorie und Praxis einer professionellen LehrerInnenausbildung (pp. 15–38). Didaktisches Zentrum der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators. Research in Educational Sciences (Vol. 25). Finnish Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
KONECS (2020). Koblenzer Netzwerk CampusGrundschulen, Studienseminare & Kindergärten [Koblenz Network Campus Elementary School, Study Seminars & Kindergartens]. www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/de/koblenz/fb1/gpko/fup/konecsGoogle Scholar
Krokfors, L., Kynäslahti, H., Stenberg, K., Toom, A., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., & Kansanen, P. (2011). Investigating Finnish teacher educators’ views on research-based teacher education. Teaching Education, 22(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Levy, P., & Petrulis, P. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
Madden, L., Ammentarp, L., DeNarie, J., & Farrell, T.-L. (2013). Benefits of faculty–undergraduate research collaboration in teacher education. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 34(1), 15–20.Google Scholar
Manak, J., & Young, G. (2014). Incorporating undergraduate research into teacher education: Preparing thoughtful teachers through inquiry-based learning. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 35(2), 35–38.Google Scholar
Mincu, M. (2013). Teacher quality and school improvement: What is the role of research? Research and teacher education: The BERA–RSA inquiry. BERA–RSA.Google Scholar
Munthe, E., & Rogne, M. (2015). Research based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 17–24.Google Scholar
Myers, J., Sawyer, A. G., Dredger, K., Barnes, S. K., & Wilson, R. (2018). Examining perspectives of faculty and students engaging in undergraduate research. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 136–149.Google Scholar
Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., & Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates’ approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170–179.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand. Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobodzian, J., Pancsofar, N., Hall, M., & Peel, A. (2016). A closer look at the pragmatic model of mentored undergraduate research in a school of education. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 37(1), 41–45.Google Scholar
Spies, A., Michaelis, J., Gerheim, U., & Hinsch, V. (2017). Forschendes Lernen in Niedersachsen – Das Oldenburger Praxissemester. In Schüssler, R., Schwier, V., Klewin, G., Schicht, S., Schöning, A. & Weyland, U. (Eds.). Das Praxissemester im Lehramtsstudium: Zugänge, Konzepte, Erfahrungen (pp. 104–110). Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, L., Rudduck, J., & Hopkins, D. (1985). Research as a basis for teaching: Readings from the work of Lawrence Stenhouse. Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Szecsi, T., Gunnels, C., Greene, J., Johnston, V., & Vazquez-Montilla, E. (2019). Teaching and evaluating skills for undergraduate research in the teacher education program. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 3(1), 20–29.Google Scholar
Tatto, M. T. (2013). The role of research in international policy and practice in teacher education. Research and teacher education: The BERA–RSA inquiry. BERA–RSA.Google Scholar
Toom, A., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., & Stenberg, K. (2010). Experiences of a research-based approach to teacher education: Suggestions for future policies. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 331–344.Google Scholar
Van Bergen, P., Lane, R., & Guilbert, D. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ research engagement using flexible and scaffolded online resources. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(4), 629–649.Google Scholar
Van Katwijk, L., Berry, A., Jansen, E., & van Veen, K. (2019). “It’s important, but I’m not going to keep doing it!”: Perceived purposes, learning outcomes, and value of pre-service teacher research among educators and pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, M., Baxley, T. P., & Kervin, C. (2017). Connecting the dots: A scaffold model for undergraduate research. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 27(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
White, S., Hepple, E., Tangen, D., Comelli, M., Alwi, A., & Shaari, Abu Hassan, Z. (2016). An introduction to education research methods: Exploring the learning journey of pre-service teachers in the transnational programme. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 35–48.Google Scholar
Yancovic-Allen, M. (2018). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of conducting and consuming research in their future professional practice. Teachers and Teaching, 24(5), 487–499.Google Scholar