Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Qualitative Approaches
from Part II - Empirical Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility , pp. 89 - 153Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Arnold, D. G., & Harris, J. D. (2012). Kantian Business Ethics: Critical Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Benz, A. (2004). Einleitung: Governance: Modebegriff oder Nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? In Benz, A. (Ed.) Governance: Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: Eine Einführung (11–28). Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
Bohmann, James, & Rehg, William (2014). Jürgen Habermas. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2014 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archies/fall2014/entries/habermas/.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. E. (1998). A Kantian Theory of Meaningful Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1083–1092.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Hamlin, A., & Pettit, P. (Eds.), The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State (pp. 18–34). Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1997a). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Bohmann, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 67–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1997b). Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In Bohmann, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 407–437). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. (2013). Reflective Equilibrium. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/reflective-equilibrium/.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism - Private Transnational Governance and Its Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eucken, Walter (2004 [1952]). Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik. Edited by Eucken, Edith and Paul Hensel, K.. UTB: Tübingen.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability: The Ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2), 187–216.Google Scholar
Gottschalk-Mazouz, N. (2004). Perspektiven der Diskursethik. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1971 [1962]). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft (5th ed.). Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung; Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984). Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984 [1981]). The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society) (McCarthy, T., Trans.). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989 [1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (Ed.). (1990). Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification - Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Lenhart, C., Weber-Nicholson, S. Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990 [1983]). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Lenhardt, C., Weber-Nicholson, S. Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1993 [1991]). Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996 [1992]). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001). The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Homann, K. (2006). Competition and Morality. Discussion Paper of the Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics, (4), 1–20.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1896 [1739]). A Treatise of Human Nature. Reprinted from the original edition in three volumes and edited, with an analytical index, by Shelby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D. (1993). Method and Moral Theory. In Singer, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 476–487) Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jastram, S. (2012). Legitimation privater Governance - Chancen und Probleme am Beispiel von ISO 26000. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.Google Scholar
Jastram, S., & Prescher, J. (2014). Legitimizing Corporate Social Responsibility Governance. In: Frederiksen, C., Strue, C., Idowu, S. O., Mermod, A. Y., & Nielsen, M. E. J. (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance: Practice and Theory (pp. 39–61). Cham. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Jastram, S., & Schneider, A.-M. (2015). Sustainable Fashion Governance at the Example of the Partnership for Sustainable Textiles. Umweltwirtschaftsforum. 23 (4), 205–212.Google Scholar
Jastram, S. (Forthcoming). Habermas’ Theorie und die Legitimation von Multi-Stakeholder-Verfahren in der Praxis. In Scholz, M. & Czuray, M. (Eds.), ISO 26000 und ONR 192500: Leitlinien und Normen zur Unternehmensverantwortung. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998 [1781]). Critique of Pure Reason. In Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W. (Eds.) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W. Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2002 [1785]). In Wood, A. W. (Ed.), Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals [Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten] (Wood, A. W. Trans.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. (2008). Globalization, Transnational Corporations, and the Future of Global Governance. In Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (pp. 249–272). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). What is Stakeholder Democracy? Perspectives and Issues. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 6-13.Google Scholar
Mueckenberger, U., & Jastram, S. (2010). Transnational Norm-building Networks and the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 223–239.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1993). Kantian Ethics. In Singer, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 175–185). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. J., & Bowie, N. E. (2004). A Kantian Perspective on the Characteristics of Ethics Programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 275–292.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. (2015). Moral Realism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2015 Edition, Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/moral-realism/Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann-Pauly, D. (2013). Democratizing Corporate Governance: Compensating for the Democratic Deficit of Corporate Political Activity and Corporate Citizenship. Business & Society, 52(3), 473–514.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The Business Firm as a Political Actor: A New Theory of the Firm for a Globalizaed World. Business & Society, 53(2), 143–156.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility: New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. A. (2010). Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(1), 5-36.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1993). Moral Realism. In Singer, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Ethics (pp. 15–37). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2004 [1919]). The Vocation Lectures. Translated by Livingstone, R.. Edited by Owen, D. & Strong, T.. Illinois: Hackett Books.Google Scholar
Wörsdörfer, M. (2010). On the Economic Ethics of Walter Eucken. In Konrad Adenauer Foundation (Ed.), Sixty Years of Social Market Economy: Formation, Development and Perspectives of a Peacemaking Formula (pp. 21–42). Sankt Augustin: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2004). Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 260–287.Google Scholar
References
Brandenburg, A. M. and Carroll, M. S. (1995) Your place or mine?: the effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society and Natural Resources 8(5):381–398.Google Scholar
Cragg, A. W. (1997) Teaching business ethics: the role of ethics in business and business education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, (3).Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. (1983) The concept of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 2, p. 1–22.Google Scholar
Kim, T. W. & Donaldson, T. (2016) Rethinking right: moral epistemology in management research. Journal of Bus Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015–3009-2.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Roojen, M. (2013). Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (1994). The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 175–180.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis: the need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business & Society 35: 89–118.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: positivism, anti- positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9: 123–140.Google Scholar
References
Bevan, D. 2007. Accountability and empire: insights from the experiences of senior managers at a FTSE100 firm. PhD thesis, King’s College London.Google Scholar
Bevan, D. 2008. Continental philosophy: a grounded theory approach and the emergence of convenient and inconvenient ethics. In: Painter-Morland, M. & Werhane, P. (eds.) Cutting-edge Issues in Business Ethics: Continental Challenges to Tradition and Practice. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Carrascoso, A. S. 2009. The identity – strategy link: Context, driver and consequences for firm internationalization. (Unpublished PhD dissertation in Business Administration). University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
Carrascoso, A. S. 2011. The ethical issues surrounding network-expansion strategies in SME internationalization: an empirical investigation. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 30(1/2), 71–112.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2005. Grounded theory in the twenty-first century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Christiansen, O. 2006. Opportunizing: a classic grounded theory study on business and management. Grounded Theory Review, 6, 109–133.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 1997. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among five Traditions, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2008. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E. & Dukerich, J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.Google Scholar
Goulding, C. 2002. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jacob, E. 1987. Qualitative research traditions: a review. Review of Educational Research, 57, 1–50.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. 2004. Otherwise than Being – or beyond Essence, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. 2005. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. 1998. Managing the post-merger aftermath by default remodelling. Management Decision, 36, 102–110, https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204188.Google Scholar
Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munhall, P. L. & Oiler, C. J. (eds.) 1986. Nursing Research: a qualitative perspective, Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Painter-Morland, M. & Werhane, P. (eds.) 2008. Cutting-edge Issues in Business Ethics: Continental Challenges to Tradition and Practice. New York, NY; Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1998). The ethnographer’s method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
References
Ailon, G. (2011). Mapping the cultural grammar of reflexivity: The case of the Enron scandal. Economy and Society, 40(1), 141–166.Google Scholar
Ailon, G. (2013). From superstars to devils: The ethical discourse on managerial figures involved in a corporate scandal. Organization, 22(1), 78–99.Google Scholar
Alasuutari, P. (1995). Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2011a). Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations, 64(9), 1121–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2011b). Organizational discourse analysis – well done or too rare? A reply to our critics. Human Relations, 64(9), 1193–1202.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2013). The closing of critique, pluralism and reflexivity: A response to Hardy and Grant and some wider reflections. Human Relations, 66(10), 1353–1371.Google Scholar
Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D. & Wodak, R. (2014). The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s publishing company.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2011), Discourse(s), social construction and language practices: In conversation with Alvesson and Kärreman. Human Relations, 64(9), 1177–1191.Google Scholar
Boyce, G. (2009). Critical, Social and Environmental Accounting: Prospects and Possibilities for Gramscian Intellectual Praxis in a Globalising World. Doctoral thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Brei, V., & Böhm, S. (2014). “1L= 10L for Africa”: Corporate social responsibility and the transformation of bottled water into a “consumer activist” commodity. Discourse & Society, 25(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
Buhr, N. & Reiter, S. (2006). Ideology, the environment and one worldview: A discourse analysis of Noranda’s environmental and sustainable development reports. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 3, 1–48.Google Scholar
Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1999). Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 649–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruana, R., & Crane, A. (2008). Constructing consumer responsibility: Exploring the role of corporate communications. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1495–1519.Google Scholar
Cedeström, C. & Spicer, A. (2014). Discourse of the real kind: A post-foundational approach to organizational discourse analysis. Organization, 21(2), 178–205.Google Scholar
Chalaby, J. K. (1996). Beyond the prison-house of language: Discourse as a sociological concept. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 684–698.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in organization studies: Towards an integrationist methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1213–1218.Google Scholar
Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: Sage.Google Scholar
de Graaf, G. (2001). Discourse theory and business ethics: The case of bankers’ conceptualizations of customers. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 299–319.Google Scholar
de Graaf, G. (2006). Discourse and descriptive business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(3), 246–258.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksson, P. & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative Methods in Business Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T. & Putnam, L. L (2014). Organizational discourse analysis. In Putnam, L. L. & Mumby, D. K. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods (3rd ed.) (271–296). London: SageGoogle Scholar
Fyke, J. P., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2013). The ethics of conscious capitalism: Wicked problems in leading change and changing leaders. Human Relations, 66(12), 1619–1643.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, R. (1993). Ideology, gender and popular radio: A discourse analytic approach. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 323–349.Google Scholar
Glynos, J. & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grant, D. & Hardy, C. (2004). Introduction: Struggles with organizational discourse. Organization Studies, 25(1), 5–13Google Scholar
Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (Eds). (1998). Discourse and Organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, E., & Czarniawska, B. (2004). Web Woman: The on-line construction of corporate and gender images. Organization, 11(5), 651–670.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. & Phillips, N. (1999). No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system. Organization Studies, 20(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. & Thomas, R. (2015). Discourse in a material world. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 680–696.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. & Grant, D. (2012). Readers beware: Provocation, problematization and … problems. Human Relations, 65(5), 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkinen, A. (2014). Discursive Constructions of Climate Change Engagement in Business Organisations. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Herzig, C. & Moon, J. (2013). Discourses on corporate social ir/responsibility in the financial sector. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1870–1880.Google Scholar
Iedema, R. (2011). Discourse studies in the twenty-first century: A response to Mats Alvesson and Dan Kärreman’s “Decolonializing discourse.” Human Relations, 64(9), 1163–1176.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Joutsenvirta, M. (2009). A language perspective to environmental management and corporate responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 240–253.Google Scholar
Joutsenvirta, M. (2011). Setting boundaries for corporate social responsibility: Firm–NGO relationship as discursive legitimation struggle. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laine, M. (2005). Meanings of the term “sustainable development” in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum, 29, 395–413.Google Scholar
Laine, M. (2009). Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes? A longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1029–1054.Google Scholar
Laine, M. (2010). Towards sustaining status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures 1987–2005. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 247–274.Google Scholar
Lämsä, A-M. & Tiensuu, T. (2002). Representations of the woman leader in Finnish business media articles. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 363–374.Google Scholar
Lehtimäki, H. & Kujala, J. (2015). Framing dynamically changing firm–stakeholder relationships in an international dispute over a foreign investment: A discursive analysis approach. Business & Society, doi: 0007650315570611.Google Scholar
Livesey, S. M. (2002). Global warming wars: rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to Exxonmobil’s corporate public discourse. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 117–148.Google Scholar
Luke, A. (2002). Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 96–110.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, H. (2013). On the ideological role of employee reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 24(4–5), 360–378.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, H. & Laine, M. (2011). A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports. Accounting Forum, 31(4), 217–231.Google Scholar
Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431.Google Scholar
Milne, M., Tregidga, H. and Walton, S. (2009). Words not action! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(8), 1211–1257.Google Scholar
Mumby, D. K. (2011). What’s cooking in organizational discourse studies? A response to Alvesson and Kärreman. Human Relations 64(9), 1147–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, D. & Wright, C. (2012). Justifying business responses to climate change: discursive strategies of similarity and difference. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1819–1835.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material-discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697–705.Google Scholar
Oswick, C., Keenoy, T. W. & Grant, D. (2000). Discourse, organizations and organizing: concepts, objects and subjects. Human Relations, 53 (9), 1115–1123.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. & Hardy, C. (1997). Managing multiple identities: Discourse, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4, 159–185.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. & Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 435–481.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Sewell, G. & Jaynes, S. (2008). Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 770–378.Google Scholar
Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Prasad, P. & Elmes, M. (2005). In the name of the practical: Unearthing the hegemony of pragmatics in the discourse of environmental management. Journal of Management Studies, 42(4), 845–867.Google Scholar
Putnam, L. & Fairhurst, G. (2001). Discourse analysis in organizations: Issues and concerns. In Jablin, F. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication (78–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Putnam, L. L. (2015). Unpacking the dialectic: Alternative views on the discourse–materiality relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 706–716.Google Scholar
Romani, L. & Szkudlarek, B. (2014). The struggles of the interculturalists: Professional ethical identity and early stages of codes of ethics development. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 173–191.Google Scholar
Siltaoja, M. (2009). On the discursive construction of a socially responsible organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 191–202.Google Scholar
Siltaoja, M. E. & Onkila, T. J. (2013). Business in society: the construction of business-society relations in responsibility reports from a critical discursive perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(4), 357–373.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Spence, C. (2007). Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(6), 855–882.Google Scholar
Spence, C. (2009). Social accounting’s emancipatory potential. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 205–227.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of Behaviour: Q-technique and Its Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and Modern Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tregidga, H. & Milne, M. J. (2006). From sustainable management to sustainable development: A longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 219–241.Google Scholar
Tregidga, H., Kearins, K. & Milne, M. (2013). The politics of knowing “organizational sustainable development.” Organization & Environment, 26(1), 102–129.Google Scholar
Tregidga, H., Milne, M. & Kearins, K. (2014). (Re)presenting “sustainable organizations.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 477–494.Google Scholar
Vaara, E. (2010). Taking the linguistic turn seriously: Strategy as a multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon. Advances in Strategic Management, 27(1), 29–50.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–813.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). The study of discourse. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process, (1–34). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Introduction: The study of discourse. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (2nd ed.) (1–7). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Walton, S. (2007). Site the mine in our backyard! Discursive strategies of community stakeholders in an environmental conflict in New Zealand. Organization & Environment, 20(2), 177–203.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar