Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Contemporary Approaches
from Part II - Empirical Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility , pp. 190 - 209Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Ashforth, B. E., and Anand, V., “The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 25 (2003), 1–52.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. M., Schaubroeck, J., Huth, M., and Ghumman, S.. “Lack of Sleep and Unethical Conduct,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2) (2011), 169–180.Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B., Bohns, V. K., and Gino, F., “Good Lamps Are the Best Policez; Darkness Increases Dishonesty and Self-interested Behavior.” Psychological science, 21(3) (2010), 311–314.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C., Levine, J. M., Mackie, D. M., Morf, C. C., Sansone, C., Vazire, S., and West, S. G.. “Improving the Dependability of Research in Personality and Social Psychology: Recommendations for Research and Educational Practice.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18 (2013), 3–12, 10.1177/1088868313507536.Google Scholar
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., and Salvador, R., ”How Low Does Ethical Leadership Flow? Test of a Trickle-down Model,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108 (2009), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, D. M. and Fernandes, M. F., “The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research,” Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11) (1991), 805–817.Google Scholar
Welsh, D., and Ordonez, L., “Conscience Without Cognition: The Effects of Subconscious Priming on Ethical Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 57(3) (2014), 723–742.Google Scholar
Gino, F. and Pierce, L., “Robin Hood Under the Hood: Wealth-based Discrimination in Illicit Customer Help,” Organization Science, 21(6) (2010), 1176–1194.Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A., and Flynn, F. J., “Full-cycle Micro-organizational Behavior Research,” Organization Science, 16(4) (2005), 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., and Treviño, L. K., “Bad Apples, Bad Cases, and Bad Barrels: Meta-analytic Evidence About Sources of Unethical Decisions at Work,” Journal of applied Psychology, 95(1) (2010), 1.Google Scholar
Bunderson, J. S., and Thompson, J. A., “The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1) (2009), 32–57.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. P., Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, (2007).Google Scholar
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C. B., and Galinsky, A. D., “The Smell of Virtue: Clean Scents Promote Reciprocity and Charity,” Psychological Science, 21(3) (2010), 381–383.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4) (1989), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevino, L. K., “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person–situation Interactionist Model,” Academy of Management Review, 11(3) (1986), 601–617.Google Scholar
Trevino, L. K., “Experimental Approaches to Studying Ethical-unethical Behavior in Organizations,” Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2) (1992), 121–136.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., and Reynolds, S. J.. “Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review.” Journal of Management, 32(6) (2006): 951–990.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., Bell, J., and Berger, M. T., Gaining Access: A Practical and Theoretical Guide for Qualitative Researchers, new edn. (Altamira Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., “Full-cycle Social Psychology,” Bickman, L. ed. Applied Social Psychology Annual, Vol. 1, (2009), 21–47.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. I., “Crossroads: The Virtues of Closet Qualitative Research.” Organization Science, 8(1) (1997), 97–106.Google Scholar
Jackall, R., “Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 1(4) (1988), 598–614.Google Scholar
Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J., and De Dreu, C. K., “Justified Ethicality: Observing Desired Counterfactuals Modifies Ethical Perceptions and Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2) (2011), 181–190.Google Scholar
Sonenshein, S., “Emergence of Ethical Issues During Strategic Change Implementation,” Organization Science, 20(1) (2009), 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, S., “The Role of Construction, Intuition, and Justification in Responding to Ethical Issues at Work: The Sensemaking-Intuition Model,” Academy of Management Review, 32(4) (2007), 1022–1040.Google Scholar
Sonenshein, S., DeCelles, K. A., and Dutton, J. E., “It’s Not Easy Being Green: The Role of Self-Evaluations in Explaining Support of Environmental Issues,” Academy of Management Journal, 57(1) (2014), 7–37.Google Scholar
Dholakia, U., “My Experience as an Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) Worker,” LinkedIn, 2016, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/my-experience-amazon-mechanical-turk-mturk-worker-utpal-dholakia.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. and Endler, N.S., (1977). Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977), pp. 333–352.Google Scholar
References
Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R. (1999). Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1032.Google Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., and Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307.Google Scholar
Bränström, R., Duncan, L. G., and Moskowitz, J. T. (2011). The association between dispositional mindfulness, psychological well-being, and perceived health in a Swedish population-based sample. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 300–316.Google Scholar
Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., and Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39(4), 713–726.Google Scholar
Burns, K., and Bechara, A. (2007). Decision making and free will: A neuroscience perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25(2), 263–280.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. E., and D’Esposito, M. (2003). Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 415–423.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
Dane, E. (2011). 18 Capturing intuitions “in flight”: Observations from research on attention and mindfulness. Handbook of intuition research, 217.Google Scholar
Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., and Kinzler, K. D. (2011). The developmental neuroscience of moral sensitivity. Emotion Review, 3(3), 305–307.Google Scholar
De Quervain, D. J., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., and Schellhammer, M. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305(5688), 1254.Google Scholar
Ding, X., Tang, Y.-Y., Cao, C., Deng, Y., Wang, Y., Xin, X., and Posner, M. I. (2015). Short-term meditation modulates brain activity of insight evoked with solution cue. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(1), 43–49. www.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu032.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., and Rangel, A. (2011). Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice: recent advances. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 3–30.Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S.. Maak, T., and Pless, N. M. (2014). Leader mindfulness and decision-making. In: Neider, Linda and Schriesheim, Chester (Eds.). Research in Management, Vol. 10: Authentic and ethical leadership, pp. 191–208, Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., and Yang, T. (2011). Mindfulness at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, D. J., Lyddy, C. J., Glomb, T. M., Bono, J. E., Brown, K. W., Duffy, M. K., … Lazar, S. W. (2015). Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 0149206315617003.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., and Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2009). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th edn, pp. 987–999). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., and Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greeson, J. M. (2009). Mindfulness research update: 2008. Complementary Health Practice Review, 14(1), 10–18.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.Google Scholar
Heekeren, H. R., Wartenburger, I., Schmidt, H., Schwintowski, H. P., and Villringer, A. (2003). An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making. Neuroreport, 14(9), 1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heeren, A., Van Broeck, N., and Philippot, P. (2009). The effects of mindfulness on executive processes and autobiographical memory specificity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(5), 403–409.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., and Baumert, A. (2010). Immediate affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgement: An adaptation of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 24(3), 522–535.Google Scholar
Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., and Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006.Google Scholar
Jones, O. D., Marois, R., Farah, M. J., and Greely, H. T. (2013). Law and neuroscience. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(45), 17624–17630.Google Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: The program of the stress reduction clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center. New York: Delta.Google Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
Kable, J. W. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience toolkit for the neuroeconomist: a functional overview. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4(2), 63.Google Scholar
Karelaia, N., and Reb, J. (2014). Improving decision making through mindfulness. Working paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar
Khoury, B., Sharma, M., Rush, S. E., and Fournier, C. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(6), 519–528.Google Scholar
Kirk, U., Gu, X., Sharp, C., Hula, A., Fonagy, P., and Montague, P. R. (2016). Mindfulness training increases cooperative decision making in economic exchanges: Evidence from fMRI. NeuroImage, 138, 274–283.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., and Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is “neuromarketing”? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199–204.Google Scholar
Lindebaum, D., and Zundel, M. (2013). Not quite a revolution: scrutinizing organizational neuroscience in leadership studies. Human Relations, 66(6), 857–877.Google Scholar
Lindquist, M. A. (2008). The statistical analysis of fMRI data. Statistical Science, 23(4), 439–464.Google Scholar
Mencl, J., and May, D. R. (2009). The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 201–226.Google Scholar
Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourao-Miranda, J., Anjelo Andrejuolo, P., and Pessoa, L. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(7), 2730–2736.Google Scholar
Moore, A., and Malinowski, P. (2009). Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 176–186.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. C., Voegtlin, C., and Maak, T. (2016). Business ethics: the promise of neuroscience. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–19.Google Scholar
Roeser, R. W., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Jha, A., Cullen, M., Wallace, L., Wilensky, R., … Harrison, J. (2013). Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout: Results from two randomized, waitlist-control field trials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 787.Google Scholar
Ruedy, N. E., and Schweitzer, M. E. (2010). In the moment: The effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 73–87.Google Scholar
Pless, N.M. and Maak, T. (2012). Levi Strauss & Co.: Addressing child labour in Bangladesh. In Mendenhall, M. E., Oddou, G. R. and Stahl, G. K. (Eds.) Readings and cases in international human resource management and organizational behavior. 5th ed., London, New York: Routledge, 446–459.Google Scholar
Pless, N. M., Sabatella, F. and Maak, T. (2017). Mindfulness, Reperceiving, and Ethical Decision Making: A Neurological Perspective. In Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making (pp. 1-20). Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Senior, C., Lee, N., and Butler, M. (2011). Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organization Science, 22(3), 804–815.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., and Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Jazaieri, H., and Goldin, P. R. (2012). Mindfulness-based stress reduction effects on moral reasoning and decision making. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(6), 504–515.Google Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157–1162.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., and Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518.Google Scholar
Stanley, E. A., and Jha, A. P. (2009). Mind fitness and mental armor: enhancing performance and building warrior resilience. Joint Force Quarterly, 55, 144–151.Google Scholar
Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., and Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19(4), 339–347.Google Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., and Fenters, V. (2016). The added value of neuroscience methods in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1094428116642013.Google Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., Stikic, M., Berka, C., Balthazard, P. A., Richardson, T., Pless, N. M., and Maak, T. (2013). Emergent leadership and team engagement: an application of neuroscience technology and methods. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2013, p. 12966). Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Wang, D., Stikic, M., Berka, C., and Korszen, S. (2015). Neuroscience and team processes. Organizational Neuroscience, 277–294.Google Scholar