Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Natural Law and Human Rights
- The Cambridge Handbook of Natural Law and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Natural Law and the Origins of Human Rights
- Part II Natural Law Foundations of Human Rights Obligations
- Part III Natural Law and Human Rights within Religious Traditions
- Part IV The Human Person, Political Community, and Rule of Law
- 18 Human Dignity and Natural Law
- 19 Civic Friendship, Natural Law, and Natural Rights
- 20 Common Goods, Group Rights, and Human Rights
- 21 Natural Law, Human Rights, and the Separation of Powers
- 22 Human Goods and Human Rights Law
- 23 Natural Law, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens
- Part V Rival Interpretations and Interpretive Principles
- Part VI Challenges and Future Prospects
- Index
21 - Natural Law, Human Rights, and the Separation of Powers
from Part IV - The Human Person, Political Community, and Rule of Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 November 2022
- The Cambridge Handbook of Natural Law and Human Rights
- The Cambridge Handbook of Natural Law and Human Rights
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Natural Law and the Origins of Human Rights
- Part II Natural Law Foundations of Human Rights Obligations
- Part III Natural Law and Human Rights within Religious Traditions
- Part IV The Human Person, Political Community, and Rule of Law
- 18 Human Dignity and Natural Law
- 19 Civic Friendship, Natural Law, and Natural Rights
- 20 Common Goods, Group Rights, and Human Rights
- 21 Natural Law, Human Rights, and the Separation of Powers
- 22 Human Goods and Human Rights Law
- 23 Natural Law, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens
- Part V Rival Interpretations and Interpretive Principles
- Part VI Challenges and Future Prospects
- Index
Summary
Modern human rights instruments reflect earlier transformations of natural rights into constitutional rights. The effect of this transformation was most apparent in the intertwining of natural rights with emerging conceptions of the separation of governmental powers. For this to take place, early modern natural law theory needed to abandon its defence of absolutist forms of government and embrace ideas developed within the common law. This chapter traces the progress of this surprising marriage. It shows how the concern of common lawyers to secure freedom under law by separating governmental powers came to be justified increasingly in terms of natural law, rather than by reference to English constitutional history. This discursive shift was given political expression in the American revolution and finally adopted into Immanuel Kant’s natural law theory as a requirement of practical reason. The essentially collaborative understanding of the relationship between legislature and judiciary which emerged is still of value in the debate between modern-day natural law theorists over the role of judicial power in the protection of human rights.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Natural Law and Human Rights , pp. 308 - 323Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022