Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Comparative Approach
- Part II Sociocultural Anthropology and Evolution
- Part III Evolution and Neuroscience
- Part IV Group Living
- Part V Evolution and Cognition
- Part VI Evolution and Development
- Part VII Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences
- Part VIII Abnormal Behavior and Evolutionary Psychopathology
- Part IX Applying Evolutionary Principles
- Part X Evolution and the Media
- Index
- References
Part IX - Applying Evolutionary Principles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Comparative Approach
- Part II Sociocultural Anthropology and Evolution
- Part III Evolution and Neuroscience
- Part IV Group Living
- Part V Evolution and Cognition
- Part VI Evolution and Development
- Part VII Sexual Selection and Human Sex Differences
- Part VIII Abnormal Behavior and Evolutionary Psychopathology
- Part IX Applying Evolutionary Principles
- Part X Evolution and the Media
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Barclay, P. (2012). The evolution of charitable behaviour and the power of reputation. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–172.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J., eds. (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Van Vugt, M. (2013). Applying Social Psychology. From Problem to Solution. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, Evolution and Behaviour, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The Truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. C., ed. (2012). Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
References
Barclay, P. (2011). The evolution of charitable behaviour and the power of reputation. In Roberts, C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. (2012). Why behaviorism isn’t Satanism. In Vonk, J. & Shackelford, T. K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. (2017). What is human nature (if it is anything at all)? In Joyce, R., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Evolution and Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 194–209.Google Scholar
Bartholomew Eldredge, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., et al. (2016). Planning Health Promotion Programs. An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Beckstrom, J. (1993). Darwinism Applied: Evolutionary Paths to Social Goals. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Buskes, C. (2006). Evolutionair Denken: De Invloed van Darwin op Ons Wereldbeeld. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Brenninkmeijer, V. (2000). Social comparison processes among depressed individuals: Evidence for the evolutionary perspective on involuntary subordinate strategies? In Sloman, L. & Gilbert, P., eds., Subordination and Defeat: A Evolutionary Approach to Mood Disorders and Their Therapy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 147–164.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2001). Evidence from a homosexual sample for a sex-specific rival-oriented mechanism: Jealousy as a function of a rival’s physical attractiveness PRIVATE and dominance. Personal Relationships, 8, 391–406.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2012). The social animal within organizations. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 36–51.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intra-sexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 37–48.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 102, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Hoben, A. D. (2013). A slow life history is related to a negative attitude towards cousin marriages: A study in three ethnic groups in Mexico. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 442–458.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Park, J. H. (2008). Not massive, but messy modularity. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Van Vugt, M. (2013). Applying Social Psychology: From Problem to Solution. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Ybema, J. F. (1997). Social comparisons and occupational stress: The identification-contrast model. In Buunk, A. P. & Gibbons, F. X., eds., Health, Coping and Well-Being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 359–388.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Peíró, J. M., Rodríguez, I., & Bravo, J. M. (2007). A loss of status and a sense of defeat: An evolutionary perspective on professional burnout. European Journal of Personality, 21(4), 471–485.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Pollet, T. V., Dijkstra, P., & Massar, K. (2011). Intrasexual competition within organizations. In Saad, G., ed., Evolutionary Psychology in the Business Sciences. New York: Springer, pp. 41–70.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Dubbs, S. L., & Van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (2012). Social influence on reproductive behavior in humans and other species. In Kenrick, D., Goldstein, N., & Braver, S., eds., Six Degrees of Social Influence: Science, Application and the Psychology of Robert Cialdini. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 98–108.Google Scholar
Buunk-Werkhoven, Y. A. B., & Buunk, A. P. (2015). Fear of social rejection and oral self-care in men versus women. International Dental Journal, 65(Suppl. S1), 13.Google Scholar
Buunk-Werkhoven, Y. A. B., Dijkstra, A., & Van der Schans, C. P. (2011). Determinants of oral hygiene behavior: A study based on the theory of planned behavior. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 39, 250–259.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985–992.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. (1988). Influences: Science and Practice. Glenview, IL: Scott-Freeman.Google Scholar
Curtis, V., & Aunger, R. (2012). Motivational mismatch: Evolved motives as the source of – and solution to – global public health problems. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 259–275.Google Scholar
De Ruiter, R. A. C., Massar, K., Van Vugt, M., & Kok, G. (2013). Applying social psychology to understanding social problems. In Golec de Zavala, A. & Cichocka, A., eds., Social Psychology of Social Problems: The Intergroup Context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waal, F. (2016). Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1999). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A., Vasquez, G., et al. (2005). Evolutionary personality psychology. In Buss, D. M., eds., The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 851–877.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Gladden, P. R., & Hohman, Z. (2012). The evolutionary psychology of criminal behavior. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–221.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (2012). Serial monogamy and clandestine adultery: Evolution and consequences of the dual human reproductive strategy. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–114.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. (2006). Evolution and depression: Issues and implications. Psychological Medicine, 36, 287–297.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P., & Allan, S. (1998). The role of defeat and entrapment (arrested flight) in depression: An exploration of an evolutionary view. Psychological Medicine, 28, 585–598.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Durante, K. M., Kim, J. S., & Cantu, S. M. (2012). Evolution, social influence, and sex ratio. In Kenrick, D., Goldstein, N., & Braver, S., eds., Six Degrees of Social Influence: Science, Application and the Psychology of Robert Cialdini. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Too Many Women? The Sex Ratio Question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413.Google Scholar
Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as mating signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Sundie, J. M., et al. (2009). Deep rationality: The evolutionary economics of decision making. Social Cognition, 27, 764–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387–15392.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2011). Sense and Nonsense. Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Livingstone Smith, D. (2007). The Most Dangerous Animal. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Nesse, R. M. (2005). Evolutionary psychology and mental health. In Buss, D. M., ed., The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 903–930.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. (2012). The evolution of business and management. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 16–35.Google Scholar
Nielsen, R., Hellmann, I., Hubisz, M., Bustamante, C., & Clark, A. G. (2007). Recent and ongoing selection in the human genome. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 8, 857–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A., eds. (1988). Perspectives on Marital Interaction. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. T., & Tilley, C. F. (1995). Sexual access to females as a motivation for joining gangs: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. H. (2012). Evolutionary perspectives on intergroup prejudice: Implications for promoting tolerance. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 186–200.Google Scholar
Park, J. H., & Buunk, A. P. (2010). Interpersonal threats and automatic motives. In Dunning, D., ed., Frontiers in Social Motivation. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 11–35.Google Scholar
Plotkin, H. (2004). Evolutionary Thought in Psychology: A Brief History. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. C., ed. (2012). Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaller, M., & Duncan, L. A. (2007). The behavioral immune system: Its evolution and social psychological implications. In Forgas, J., Haselton, M., & Von Hippel, W., eds., Evolution and the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Social Cognition. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 293–307.Google Scholar
Schaller, M., Simpson, J. A., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Evolution and Social Psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Buunk, A. P. (2003). Burnout: An overview of 25 years of research and theorizing. In Schabracq, M. J., Winnubst, J. A. M., & Cooper, C. L., eds., The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 383–425.Google Scholar
Steg, L. M., Keizer, K., Buunk, A. P., & Rothengatter, T., eds. (2016). Applied Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, L. S. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptionist perspective. In Buss, D. M., ed., The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 292–343.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J., eds., The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–136.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2005/2016). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M., ed., The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 5–67.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2015). The theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M., ed., The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3–87.Google Scholar
Troisi, A. (2012). Mental health and well-being: Clinical applications of Darwinian psychiatry. In Roberts, S. C., ed., Applied Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 276–289.Google Scholar
Van Brummen-Girigori, O., & Buunk, A. P. (2016). Intrasexual competitiveness and non-verbal seduction strategies to attract males: A study among teenage girls from Curaçao. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 134–141.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., & Hardy, C. L. (2010). Cooperation for reputation: Wasteful contributions as costly signals in public goods. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 101–111.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., & Park, J. H. (2009). Guns, germs and sex: How evolution shaped our intergroup psychology. Social and Personality Compass, 3, 927–938.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18, 19–23.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182–196.Google Scholar
Wertheim, W. F. (1973). Dawning of an Asian dream: Selected Articles on Modernization and Emancipation. Amsterdam: Antropological–Sociological Center of the University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 271, 177–179.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. W., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
References
Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian Twin Registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 537–545.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borsboom, D., & Dolan, C. V. (2006). Why g is not an adaptation: A comment on Kanazawa (2004). Psychological Review, 111, 433–437.Google Scholar
Buss, D. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 359–366.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1985). Child abuse and other risks of not living with both parents. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 197–210.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 667–673.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A., Vásquez, G., et al. (2005). Evolutionary personality psychology. In Buss, D. M., ed., Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 851–877.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Gladden, P. R., Vásquez, G., Wolf, P. S. A., & Jones, D. N. (2009). Evolutionary theories of personality. In Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology: Part IV. Biological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–274.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (2015). The stability and change of malaise scores over 27 years: Findings from a nationally representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 30–34.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (1998). The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2009). Is there a “party” in your genes? Political Research Quarterly, 62, 584–600.Google Scholar
Hur, Y.-M. (2007). Stability of genetic influence on morningness–eveningness: A cross-sectional examination of South Korean twins from preadolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Sleep Research, 16, 17–23.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jockin, V., McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1996). Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 288–299.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2004). General intelligence as a domain-specific adaptation. Psychological Review, 111, 512–523.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2010). Evolutionary psychology and intelligence research. American Psychologist, 65, 279–289.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2011). Evolutionary psychology and individual differences. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., von Stumm, S., & Furnham, A., eds., The Handbook of Individual Differences. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley, pp. 353–376.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2012). The Intelligence Paradox: Why the Intelligent Choice Isn’t Always the Smart One. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.Google Scholar
McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1992). Genetic influence on risk of divorce. Psychological Science, 3, 368–373.Google Scholar
Miller, A. S., & Kanazawa, S. (2007). Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2000). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2004). Why is conscientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1013–1022.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2005). An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 26, 363–373.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2012). Behavior Genetics, 6th ed. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. C. (1994). The Limits of Family Influence: Genes, Experience, and Behavior. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Segal, N. L. (2013). Personality similarity in unrelated look-alikes: Addressing a twin study challenge. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 23–28.Google Scholar
Segal, N. L., Graham, J. L., & Ettinger, U. (2013). Unrelated look-alikes: Replicated study of personality similarity and qualitative findings on social relatedness. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 169–174.Google Scholar
Settle, J. E., Dawes, C. T., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). The heritability of partisan attachment. Political Science Quarterly, 62, 601–613.Google Scholar
Sosis, R. (2009). The adaptationist–byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 315–352.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67.Google Scholar
References
Al-Rodhan, N. R. F. (2008). Emotional Amoral Egoism: A Neurophilosophical Theory of Human Nature and Its Universal Security Implications. Zurich: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2013). Can evolutionary principles explain patterns of family violence? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 403–440.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological Approaches to mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (2016). The differential susceptibility hypothesis: Sensitivity to the environment for better and for worse. JAMA Pediatrics, 170(4), 321–322.Google Scholar
Blackstone, W. (1765–1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England: A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765–1769, Vol. 1. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, C., & Fisher, M. (2018). More bro’s, more woes? A look at the prevalence of coalitions in crimes of robbery. Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 12(2), 126–131.Google Scholar
Brunner, H. G., Nelen, M., Breakefield, X. O., Ropers, H. H., & van Oost, B. A. (1993). Abnormal behaviour associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science, 262(5133), 578–580.Google Scholar
Buades-Rotger, M., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2014). The role of the monoamine oxidase A gene in moderating the response to adversity and associated antisocial behavior: A review. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 7, 185–200.Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. (2005). Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 359–366.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–214.Google Scholar
Cartwight, J. (2016). Evolution and Human Behaviour: Darwinian Perspectives on the Human Condition, 3rd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–854.Google Scholar
Coccaro, E. F., Beresford, B., Minar, P., Kaskow, J., & Geracioti, T. (2007). CSF testosterone: Relationship to aggression, impulsivity, and venturesomeness in adult males with personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41(6), 488–492.Google Scholar
Coid, J., Yang, M., Roberts, A., et al. (2006a). Violence and psychiatric morbidity in a national household population – A report from the British Household Survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164(12), 1199–1208.Google Scholar
Coid, J., Yang, M., Tyrer, P., Roberts, A., & Ullrich, S. (2006b). Prevalence and correlates of personality disorder in Great Britain. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 423–431.Google Scholar
Craig, M. C., Catani, M., Deeley, Q., et al. (2009). Altered connections on the road to psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 946–953.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2005). The “Cinderella effect” is no fairy tale. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 507–508.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2007). Is the “Cinderella Effect” controversial? In Crawford, C. & Krebs, D. L., eds., Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 383–400.Google Scholar
Davis, M. S. (2006). Criminal mala in se: An equity-based definition. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(3), 270–289.Google Scholar
Decuyper, M., De Fruyt, F., & Buschman, J. (2008). A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic–psychiatric sample. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(5), 394–406.Google Scholar
Dolan, M. (2004). Psychopathic personality in young people. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10, 466–473.Google Scholar
Dugdale, R. L. (1877). The Jukes: A Study in Crime, Pauperism, and Heredity. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Dustin, R. R., & Alcock, J. (2018). Animal Behavior, 11th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Dutton, K. (2012). The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies, and Serial Killers Can Teach Us about Success. New York: Scientific American.Google Scholar
Fallon, J. (2013). The Psychopath Inside: A Neuroscientist’s Personal Journey into the Dark Side of the Brain. Shelton, CT: Current Publishing.Google Scholar
Fazel, S., & Danesh, J. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet, 359(9306), 545–550.Google Scholar
Frodi, A., Dernevik, M., Sepa, A., Philipson, J., & Bragesjo, M. (2001). Current attachment representations of incarcerated offenders varying in degree of psychopathy. Attachment and Human Development, 3, 269–283.Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Raine, A., Chan, F., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (2010). Early maternal and paternal bonding, childhood physical abuse and adult psychopathic personality. Psychological Medicine, 40(6), 1007–1016.Google Scholar
Ge, X., Conger, R. D., Cadoret, R. J., et al. (1996). The developmental interface between nature and nurture: A mutual influence model of child antisocial behaviour and parent behaviours. Developmental Psychology, 32, 574–589.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A., & Lawson, D. W. (2015). Applying evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 24(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
Glenn, A. I., Kurzban, R., & Raine, A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 371–380.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. L., Baird, A. A., & End, A. (2004). Functional differences among those high and low on a trait measure of psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 56, 516–521.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.Google Scholar
Guo, G., Ou, X.-M., Roettger, M., & Shih, J. C. (2008). The VNTR 2-repeat in MAOA and delinquent behaviour in adolescence and young adulthood: Associations and MAOA promoter activity. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(5), 626–634.Google Scholar
Hagerty, B. B. (2010). Inside a psychopath’s brain: The sentencing debate. NPR. www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128116806.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy. In Patrick, C. J., ed., Handbook of Psychopathy. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 58–88.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Cushman, F. A., Young, L., Kang-Xing, K., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgements and justifications. Mind and Language, 22(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Young, L., & Cushman, F. A. (2008). Reviving Rawl’s linguistic analogy. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W, ed., Moral Psychology, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 107–143.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil, 1982 reprint. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2009). Evolutionary psychology and crime. In Walsh, A. & Beaver, K. M., eds., Biosocial Criminology: New Directions in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 90–110.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S., & Still, M. C. (2000). Why men commit crimes (and why they desist). Sociological Theory, 18(3), 434–437.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998). Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(10), 389–398.Google Scholar
Kiehl, K. A., Smith, A. M., Hare, R. D., et al. (2001). Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 677–684.Google Scholar
Krebs, D. L. (1998). The evolution of moral behaviour. In Crawford, C. & Krebs, D. L., eds., Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Ideas, Issues, and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 337–368.Google Scholar
Larsson, H., Andershed, H., & Lichtenstein, P. (2006). A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 221–230.Google Scholar
Lyons, M. J., True, W. R., Eisen, S. A., et al. (1995). Differential heritability of adult and juvenile antisocial traits. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 906–915.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., Tingley, D., Cowden, J., Frazzetto, G., & Johnston, D. D. P. (2009). Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioural aggression following provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 2118–2123.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. (2004). Understanding Psychology and Crime: Perspectives on Theory and Action. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, M., & Troisi, A. (1998). Darwinian Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mealey, L. (1995). Primary sociopathy (psychopathy) is a type, secondary is not. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 19, 579–599.Google Scholar
Mealey, L. (2005). Evolutionary psychopathology and abnormal development. In Burgess, R. L. & MacDonald, K., eds., Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Development, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 381–406.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2008). Behavioural Genetics, 4th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Raine, A. (2002). The biological basis of crime. In Wilson, J. Q. & Petersilia, J., eds., Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control. Oakland, CA: ICS Press, pp. 43–74.Google Scholar
Ruse, M., & Wilson, E. (1985). The evolution of morality. New Scientist, 1478, 108–128.Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Harari, H., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Levkovitz, Y. (2010). The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies. Cortex, 46(5), 668–677.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B. (1980). Adoption and kinship in Oceania. American Anthropologist, 82, 799–820.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B. (1990). Human adoption in evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 1, 25–52.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. (2016). Crime and Criminality: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Abington: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, S., & Workman, L. (2019). The evolution of crime. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., eds., Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3209-1.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B., ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 139–179.Google Scholar
Troisi, A. (2015). The evolutionary diagnosis of mental disorder. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(3), 323–331.Google Scholar
Troisi, A., & McGuire, M. T. (2000). Psychotherapy in the context of Darwin psychiatry. In Gilbert, P. & Bailey, K. G., eds., Genes on the Couch: Explorations in Evolutionary Psychotherapy. London: Routledge, pp. 28–41.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M. (2009). Sex differences in intergroup competition, aggression, and warfare: The male warrior hypothesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 124–134.Google Scholar
Wild, S. E., ed. (2010). Webster’s New World Law Dictionary. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Workman, L., & Reader, W. (2014). Evolutionary Psychology: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Raine, A., Narr, K. L., Colletti, P., & Toga, A. W. (2009). Localisation of deformations within the amygdala in individuals with psychopathy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 986–994.Google Scholar
References
Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 5, 325–383.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., & Lancaster, J. B. (1999). Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers. I: Reports from Albuquerque men. Evolution & Human Behavior, 20, 405–431.Google Scholar
Barth, R. P., Berry, M., Yoshikami, R., Goodfield, R. K., & Carson, M. L. (1988). Predicting adoption disruption. Social Work, 33, 227–233.Google Scholar
Bausch, R. S. (2006). Predicting willingness to adopt a child: A consideration of demographic and attitudinal factors. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 47–65.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–1187.Google Scholar
Biblarz, T. J., & Raftery, A. E. (1999). Family structure, educational attainment, and socioeconomic success: Rethinking the “pathology of matriarchy.” American Journal of Sociology, 105, 321–365.Google Scholar
Boswell, J. (1988). The Kindness of Strangers: The Abandonment of Children in Western Europe from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.Google Scholar
Carroll, V., ed. (1970). Adoption in Eastern Oceania. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Case, A., & Paxson, C. (2001). Mothers and others: Who invests in children’s health? Journal of Health Economics, 20, 301–328.Google Scholar
Case, A., Lin, I.-F., & McLanahan, S. (2000). How hungry is the selfish gene? Economic Journal, 110, 781–804.Google Scholar
Chapais, B. (2008). Primeval Kinship: How Pair-Bonding Gave Birth to Human Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chrastil, E. R., Getz, W. M., Euler, H. A., & Starks, P. T. (2006). Paternity uncertainty overrides sex chromosome selection for preferential grandparenting. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 206–223.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coall, D. A., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Grandparental investment: Past, present and future. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 33, 1–19.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Perry, G. (2011). Has the child welfare profession discovered nepotistic biases? Human Nature, 22, 350–369.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Perry, G. (2017). Matrilateral bias in human grandmothering. Frontiers in Sociology, 2, 11.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1980). Discriminative parental solicitude: A biological perspective. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 42, 277–288.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1985). Child abuse and other risks of not living with both parents. Ethology & Sociobiology, 6, 197–210.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1988). The Darwinian psychology of discriminative parental solicitude. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 35, 91–144.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1994). Some differential attributes of lethal assaults on small children by stepfathers versus genetic fathers. Ethology & Sociobiology, 15, 207–217.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1995). Discriminative parental solicitude and the relevance of evolutionary models to the analysis of motivational systems. In Gazzaniga, M., ed., The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1269–1286.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1996). Evolutionary psychology and marital conflict: the relevance of stepchildren. In Buss, D. M. & Malamuth, N., eds., Sex, Power, Conflict: Feminist and Evolutionary Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). The Truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2001). An assessment of some proposed exceptions to the phenomenon of nepotistic discrimination against stepchildren. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 38, 287–296.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2008). Is the “Cinderella effect” controversial? A case study of evolution-minded research and critiques thereof. In Crawford, C. B. & Krebs, D., eds., Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 381–398.Google Scholar
Daly, M., Singh, L. S., & Wilson, M. I. (1993). Children fathered by previous partners: A risk factor for violence against women. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84, 209–210.Google Scholar
Damas, D. (1983). Demography and kinship as variables of adoption in the Carolines. American Ethnologist, 10, 328–344.Google Scholar
Danielsbacka, M., Tanskanen, A. O., Jokela, M., & Rotkirch, A. (2011). Grandparental child care in Europe: Evidence for preferential investment in more certain kin. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 3–24.Google Scholar
Decaluwe, B., Jacobson, S. W., Poirier, M.-A., et al. (2015). Impact of Inuit customary adoption on behavioral problems in school-age Inuit children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 250–258.Google Scholar
Emmott, E. H., & Mace, R. (2015). Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties. Evolution & Human Behavior, 35, 438–444.Google Scholar
Euler, H. A., & Weitzel, B. (1996). Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategy. Human Nature, 7, 39–59.Google Scholar
Fergusson, D. M., Fleming, J., & O’Neill, D. P. (1972). Child Abuse in New Zealand. Wellington: Government of New Zealand Printer.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. V., & England, B. G. (1995). Childhood stress and family environment. Current Anthropology, 36, 854–866.Google Scholar
Fox, M., Sear, R., Beise, J., et al. (2010). Grandma plays favourites: X-chromosome relatedness and sex-specific childhood mortality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 567–573.Google Scholar
Gelles, R. J., & Harrop, J. W. (1991). The risk of abusive violence among children with nongenetic caretakers. Family Relations, 40, 78–83.Google Scholar
Hamilton, L., Cheng, S., & Powell, B. (2007). Adoptive parents, adaptive parents: Evaluating the importance of biological ties for parental investment. American Sociological Review, 72, 95–116.Google Scholar
Harris, G. T., Hilton, N. Z., Rice, M. E., & Eke, A. W. (2007). Children killed by genetic versus step-parents. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 85–95.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K. (2003). Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 380–400.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1997). Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning, and the evolution of long post-menopausal life spans. Current Anthropology, 38, 551–577.Google Scholar
Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2015). The step-father effect in child abuse: Comparing discriminative parental solicitude and antisociality. Psychology of Violence, 5, 8–15.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, L. D. (2000). Who seeks to adopt a child? Findings from the National Survey of Family Growth (1995). Adoption Quarterly, 3, 1–23.Google Scholar
Holt, M. I. (1994). Orphan Trains: Placing Out in America. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Huber, B. R., & Breedlove, W. L. (2007). Evolutionary theory, kinship, and childbirth in cross-cultural perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 196–219.Google Scholar
Judge, D. S., & Hrdy, S. B. (1992). Allocation of accumulated resources among close kin: Inheritance in Sacramento, California, 1890–1984. Ethology & Sociobiology, 13, 495–522.Google Scholar
Klaus, M. H., & Kennell, J. H. (1976). Maternal–Infant Bonding. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. L. (2005). Children’s help and the pace of reproduction: Cooperative breeding in humans. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 224–237.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417–436.Google Scholar
Malvaso, C., Delfabbro, P., Proeve, M., & Nobes, G. (2015). Predictors of child injury in biological and stepfamilies. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 8, 149–159.Google Scholar
McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing Up with a Single Parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mturi, A. J. (2012). Child-headed households in South Africa: What we know and what we don’t. Development Southern Africa, 29, 506–516.Google Scholar
Palacios, J., & Brodzinsky, D. (2010). Adoption research: Trends, topics, outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 270–284.Google Scholar
Park, N. K., & Hill, P. W. (2014). Is adoption an option? The role of importance of motherhood and fertility help-seeking in considering adoption. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 601–626.Google Scholar
Perry, G. (2015). Alloparental care in two societies: Who helps and in what circumstances? Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Missouri.Google Scholar
Perry, G. (2017a). Alloparental care and assistance in a normatively patrilocal society. Current Anthropology, 58, 114–123.Google Scholar
Perry, G. (2017b). Going home: How mothers maintain natal family ties in a patrilocal society. Human Nature, 28, 219–230.Google Scholar
Perry, G., Daly, M., & Macfarlan, S. (2014). Maternal foster families provide more stable placements than paternal families. Children & Youth Services Review, 46, 155–159.Google Scholar
Preston, S. (2013). The origins of altruism in offspring care. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1305–1341.Google Scholar
Reghupathy, N., Judge, D. S., Sanders, K. A., Amaral, P. C., & Schmitt, L. H. (2012). Child size and household characteristics in rural Timor-Leste. American Journal of Human Biology, 24, 35–41.Google Scholar
Rice, W. R., Gavrilets, S., & Friberg, U. (2008). Sexually antagonistic “zygotic drive” of the sex chromosomes. PLoS Genetics, 4(12), e1000313.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S., Herron, J. C., & Daly, M. (1999). Stepparental behavior as mating effort in birds and other animals. Evolution & Human Behavior, 20, 367–390.Google Scholar
Royle, N., Smiseth, P. T., & Kolliker, M., eds. (2012). The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. (2011). The place of proximity: Social support in mother–adult daughter relationships. Human Nature, 22, 108–127.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution & Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2009). Family matters: Kin, demography and child health in a rural Gambian population. In Bentley, G. R. & Mace, R., eds., Substitute Parents: Alloparenting in Human Societies. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 50–76.Google Scholar
Sheppard, P., & Sear, R. (2016). Do grandparents compete with or support their grandchildren? In Guatemala, paternal grandmothers may compete, and maternal grandmothers may cooperate. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 160069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silk, J. B. (1980). Adoption and kinship in Oceania. American Anthropologist, 82, 799–820.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B. (1987). Adoption and fosterage in human societies: Adaptation or enigma? Cultural Anthropology, 2, 39–49.Google Scholar
Silk, J. B. (1990). Human adoption in evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 1, 25–52.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (1981). Kin investment in grandchildren. Unpublished PhD dissertation, York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (1988). Research in developmental sociobiology: Parenting and family behavior. In MacDonald, K. B., ed., Sociobiological Perspectives on Human Development. New York: Springer, pp. 271–292.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. (1991). Introduction. In Smith, P. K., ed., The Psychology of Grandparenthood. An International Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Smith, S. L., Howard, J. A., Garnier, P. C., & Ryan, S. D. (2006). Where are we now? A post-ASFA examination of adoption disruption. Adoption Quarterly, 9, 19–44.Google Scholar
Somander, L. K. H., & Rammer, L. M. (1991). Intra- and extrafamilial child homicide in Sweden 1971–1980. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 45–55.Google Scholar
Strassmann, B. L., & Garrard, W. M. (2011). Alternatives to the grandmother hypothesis: A meta-analysis of the association between grandparental and grandchild survival in patrilineal populations. Human Nature, 22, 201–222.Google Scholar
Sundström, M. (2013). Growing Up in a Blended Family or a Stepfamily: What Is the Impact on Education? Working Paper 2/2013. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2018). Intergenerational Relations: An Evolutionary Social Science Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Temrin, H., Buchmayer, S., & Enquist, M. (2000). Step-parents and infanticide: New data contradict evolutionary predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 267, 943–945.Google Scholar
Temrin, H., Nordlund, J., & Sterner, H. (2004). Are stepchildren overrepresented as victims of lethal parental violence in Sweden? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences (Suppl.), 271, S120–S124.Google Scholar
Temrin, H., Nordlund, J., Rying, M., & Tullberg, B. S. (2011). Is the higher rate of parental child homicide in stepfamilies an effect of non-genetic relatedness? Current Zoology, 57, 253–259.Google Scholar
Tooley, G. A., Karakis, M., Stokes, M., & Ozanne-Smith, J. (2006). Generalising the Cinderella effect to unintentional childhood fatalities. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 224–230.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B., ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
Voland, E., & Beise, J. (2002). Opposite effects of maternal and paternal grandmothers on infant survival in historical Krummhörn. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 52, 435–443.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, J., Burnell, I., Taylor, B., & Butler, N. (1983). Family type and accidents in preschool children. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 37, 100–104.Google Scholar
Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., & Shackelford, T. K. (2004). Methods of filicide: Stepparents and genetic parents kill differently. Violence & Victims, 19, 75–87.Google Scholar
White, L. K., & Booth, A. (1985). The quality and stability of remarriages: The role of stepchildren. American Sociological Review, 50, 689–698.Google Scholar
Zinn, A. (2010). A typology of kinship foster families: Latent class and exploratory analyses of kinship family structure and household composition. Children & Youth Services Review, 32, 325–337.Google Scholar
Zvoch, K. (1999). Family type and investment in education: A comparison of genetic and stepparent families. Evolution & Human Behavior, 20, 453–464.Google Scholar
References
Alves, A. A. (1996). Brutality and Benevolence: Human Ethology, Culture and the Birth of Mexico. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Ardant du Picq, C. (2004). Etudes sur le Combat: Combat Antique et Combat Moderne, Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Balshine, S. (2012). Patterns of parental care in vertebrates. In Royle, N. J., Smiseth, P. T., & Kolliker, M., eds. The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 62–80.Google Scholar
Barash, D., & Lipton, J. (2001). The Myth of Monogamy: Fidelity and Infidelity in Animals and People. New York: Holt Books.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. (1979). Human ethology: Empirical wealth, theoretical dearth. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 1–57.Google Scholar
Barrett, L., Dunbar, R., & Lycett, J. (2002). Human Evolutionary Psychology. Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bechtold, B. H. (2001). Infanticide in 19th-century France: A quantitative interpretation. Review of Radical Political Economics, 33, 165–187.Google Scholar
Bechtold, B. H. (2006). The changing value of female offspring in 19th-century France: Evidence from secondary sex ratios. In Killing Infants: Studies in the Worldwide Practice of Infanticide. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, pp. 315–335.Google Scholar
Beise, J. (2005). The helping and the helpful grandmother: The role of maternal and paternal grandmothers in child mortality in the seventeenth and eighteenth-century population of French settlers in Quebec, Canada. In Grandmotherhood: The Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life. New Brunswick, NJ/London: Rutgers University Press, pp. 215–238.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. (1986). Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. (1991). History. In Maxwell, M., ed., The Sociobiological Imagination. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 131–140.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (2013). The biocultural evolution of conflict resolution between groups, In Fry, D. P., ed., War, Peace and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 315–340.Google Scholar
Boone, J. L., III (1988). Parental investment, social subordination and population processes among the 15th and 16th century Portuguese nobility. In Human Reproductive Behavior: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–219.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2001). The Origin of Values: Sociology and Philosophy of Beliefs. New Brunswick, NJ/London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1996). Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology in Early Religions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–61.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. C., & Caldwell, B. K. (2005). Family size control by infanticide in the great agrarian societies of Asia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36, 205–226.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. D., & Lee, J. Z. (2010). Fertility control in historical China revisited: New methods for an old debate. History of the Family, 15, 370–385.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. (2013). Noble Savages: My Life among Two Dangerous Tribes – The Yanomamo and the Anthropologists. New York/London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Collomp, A. (1983). La Maison du Père: Famille et Village en Haute-Provence aux XVIIe et XVIIIe Siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Costa, M. (2003). Psicologia Militare: Elementi di Psicologia per gli Appartenenti alle Forze Armate. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. (2010). Infanticide, abandonment and abortion in the Graeco-Roman and early medieval world: Archaeological perspectives. In Brockliss, L. & Montgomery, H., eds., Childhood and Violence in the Western Tradition. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
Cusson, M. (1990). Croissance et Décroissance du Crime. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cusson, M. (2000). Les homicides d’hier et d’aujourd’hui. In L’Acteur et ses Raisons: Mélanges en l’Honneur de Raymond Boudon. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 43-58.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1995). Discriminative parental solicitude and the relevance of evolutionary models to the analysis of motivational systems. In Gazzaniga, M., ed., The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1269–1286.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam Press.Google Scholar
Dansette, M.-D. (1987). La mortinatalité et l’infanticide dissimulée dans le canton de Milly, 1780–1872. Bulletin de la Société Historique et Archéologique de Corbeil, de l’Essonne et du Hurepoix, 93, 9–53.Google Scholar
Degler, C. N. (1981). Can a historian or social scientist learn anything from sociobiology? An attempt at an answer. Historical Methods, 14, 173–179.Google Scholar
Devereux, G. (1955). A Study of Abortion in Primitive Societies: A Typological, Distributional and Dynamic Analysis of the Prevention of Birth in 400 Preindustrial Societies. New York: Julian Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1989). Peacemaking among Primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1992). The Chimpanzee’s sense of social regularity and its relation to the human sense of justice. In Masters, R. D. & Gruter, M., eds., The Sense of Justice: Biological Foundations of Law. London: Sage Publications, pp. 241–255.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1996). Good Natured: The Origin of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (2010). Morality and its relation to primate social instincts. In Hogh-Olesen, H., ed., Human Morality and Sociality: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Di Simplicio, O. (2011). Luxuria: Eros e Violenza nel Seicento. Rome: Salerno Editrice.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (1995a). Chimera, spandrel or adaptation: Conceptualizing art in human evolution. Human Nature, 6, 99–117.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (1995b). Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes From and Why. Seattle, WA/London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Drixler, F. (2013). Mabiki: Infanticide and Population Growth in Eastern Japan, 1660–1950. Berkeley, CA/Los Angeles, CA/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drixler, F., & Kok, J. (2016). A lost family-planning regime in 18th-century Ceylon. Population Studies, 70, 93–114.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1988). Darwinizing man: A commentary. In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, N., & Turke, P., eds., Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–169.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2009). The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution. New York/London/Berlin: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, M. (2001). Modernization, self-control and lethal violence: The long-term dynamics of European homicide rates in theoretical perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 618–638.Google Scholar
Eisner, M. (2011). Introduction: Human evolution, history and violence. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 473–478.Google Scholar
Engen, R. (2009). Tuer pour son pays: Nouveau regard sur l’homicidologie. Revue Militaire Canadienne, 9, 120–128.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, G., ed. (2014) Display of Art in the Roman Palace, 1550–1750. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. (1992). The Anatomy of Love: A Natural History of Mating, Marriage and Why We Stray. New York: Batus.Google Scholar
Fox, R. (2011). The Tribal Imagination: Civilization and the Savage Mind. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gat, A. (2010). The causes of war in natural and historical evolution. In Hogh-Olesen, H., ed., Human Morality and Sociality: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave, pp. 160–190.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2011). Who’s in Charge? Free Will and the Science of the Brain. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Ghiglieri, M. P. (2000). The Dark Side of Man: Tracing the Origins of Male Violence. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Gordin, M. D. (2014). Evidence and the instability of biology. American Historical Review, 119(5), 1621–1629.Google Scholar
Grossman, D. (1995). On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. Boston, MA/London: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Grossman, D. (2004). On Combat: The Psychology and Physiology of Deadly Conflict in War and Peace (with Christensen, L. W.). Mascoutah, IL: PPCT Research Publications.Google Scholar
Haas, J., & Piscitelli, M. (2013). The prehistory of warfare: Misled by ethnography? In Fry, D. P., ed., War, Peace and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 168–190.Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2002). Violence and its control in the late Renaissance: An Italian model. In Ruggiero, G., ed., A Companion to the Worlds of the Renaissance. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 139–155.Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2003). L’infanticidio dei coppie sposati nella Toscana della Contro-Riforma. Quaderni Storici, 38, 453–498. (English version on the author’s Academia.edu webpage.)Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2004). Justice in the Age of Lordship: A feudal tribunal in 17th-century Tuscany. Sixteenth Century Journal, 35, 1005–1033.Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2007). Human Nature in Rural Tuscany: An Early Modern Story. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2009). The facts of life in rural Counter-Reformation Tuscany. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 40, 1–31.Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2013). The decline of violence in the West: From cultural to post-cultural history: Review article. English Historical Review, 128, 367–400.Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2016a). Italy 1636: Cemetery of Armies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanlon, G. (2016b). Routine infanticide in the West 1500–1800. History Compass, 14, 535–548.Google Scholar
Harris, M., & Ross, E. B. (1987). Death, Sex and Fertility: Population Regulation in Preindustrial and Developing Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Héritier, F. (2004). Les fondements de la violence. Analyse anthropologique. In Touati, A, ed., Violences: De la Réflexion à l’Intervention. Antibes: Cultures en Mouvement. pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants and Natural Selection. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA/London: Bellknap Press.Google Scholar
Hynes, L. (2011). Routine infanticide by married couples? An assessment of baptismal records from seventeenth-century Parma. Journal of Early Modern History, 15, 507–530.Google Scholar
Jacob, F. (1998). Of Flies, Mice and Men. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1994). Galen’s Prophecy: Temperament in Human Nature. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1998). Three Seductive Ideas. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keegan, J. (1976). The Face of Battle: A Study of Agincourt, Waterloo and the Somme. Harmondsworth/New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Keegan, J. (1997). Towards a theory of combat motivation. In Addison, P. & Calder, A., eds., Time to Kill: The Soldier’s Experience of War in the West 1939–1945. London: Pimlico, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (1994). The Chosen Primate: Human Nature and Cultural Diversity. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (1999). Culture: The Anthropologist’s Account. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, J. (2002). Human sex ratios: Adaptations and mechanisms, problems and prospects. In Hardy, I. C. W, ed., Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–313.Google Scholar
Lee, J. Z., & Wang, F. (1999). One Quarter of Humanity: Malthusian Mythology and Chinese Realities, 1700–2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990). Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, K. A. (2011). Why weren’t (many) European women “missing”? History of the Family, 16, 250–266.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2000). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Montecuccoli, R. (1752). Memoires de Montecuculi, Généralissime des Troupes de l’Empereur, Divisé en Trois Livres. Amsterdam: Wetstein.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P., & White, D. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8, 329–369.Google Scholar
Nassiet, M. (2011). La Violence, une Histoire Sociale: France, XVIe–XVIIIe Siècles. Seyssel: Champvallon.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J., & Panksepp, J. B. (2000). The seven sins of evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Cognition, 6, 108–127.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Harmondsworth/New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence and Its Causes. London/New York: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Quartz, S. R., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002). Liars, Lovers and Heroes: What the New Brain Science Reveals about How We Become What We Are. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Reynolds, G. (1979). Infant mortality and sex ratios at baptism as shown by reconstruction of Willingham, a parish at the edge of the Fens in Cambridgeshire. Local Population Studies, 22, 31–37.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. P. (2005). War and Human Nature. Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. (2015) Very Different, but Much the Same: The Evolution of English Society since 1714. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saad, G. (2007). The Evolutionary Bases of Consumption. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2010). Greco-Roman sex ratios and femicide in comparative perspective. Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1505793.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2014). Evolutionary psychology and the historian. American Historical Review, 119, 1563–1575.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.Google Scholar
Smail, D. L. (2003). The Consumption of Justice: Emotions, Publicity and Legal Culture in Marseille, 1264–1423. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tallis, R. (2011). Aping Mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the Misrepresentation of Humanity. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report 88-1. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7f95/d9d117721df9e69b929b004d9d85ea6c560d.pdf.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Part 1. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 29–49.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.Google Scholar
Trexler, R. C. (1973). Infanticide in Florence: New sources and first results. History of Childhood Quarterly, 1, 98–116.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L., & Willard, D. E. (1973). Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90–92.Google Scholar
Voland, E., & Beise, J. (2002). Differential infant mortality viewed from an evolutionary biological perspective. History of the Family, 7, 515–526.Google Scholar
Voland, E., & Beise, J. (2005). “The husband’s mother is the devil in the house”: Data on the impact of the mother-in-law on stillbirth mortality in historical Krummhorn (1750–1874) and some thoughts on the evolution of postgenerative female life. In Grandmotherhood: The Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 239–255.Google Scholar
Voland, E., & Stephan, P. (2000). “The hate that love generated”: Sexually-selected neglect of one’s own offspring in humans. In van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H., eds., Infanticide by Males and Its Implications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 447–465.Google Scholar
Voland, E., Dunbar, R. M., Engel, C., & Stephan, P. (1997). Population increase and sex-biased parental investment in humans: Evidence from 18th and 19th century Germany. Current Anthropology, 38, 129–135.Google Scholar
Wells, R. (1990). Human Sex Determination: An Historical Review and Synthesis. Riverlea: Tharwa Australia.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (2012). The Social Conquest of Earth. New York/London: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence. Boston, MA/New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation Seeking and Risky Behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
References
All The Tropes Wiki (2017). Planet of Hats. http://allthetropes.wikia.com/wiki/Planet_of_Hats.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1975). Prestige and culture: A biosocial approach. Current Anthropology, 16(4), 553–572.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1977). Conformity to ethos and reproductive success in two Hausa communities: An empirical evaluation. Ethos, 5(4), 409–425.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1980a). Biological evolution of culturally patterned behavior. In Lockard, J., ed., The Evolution of Human Social Behavior. New York: Elsevier, pp. 227–296.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1980b). Prestige and self-esteem: A biosocial interpretation. In Omark, D. R., Strayer, F. F., & Freedman, D. G., eds., Dominance Relations: An Ethological View of Human Conflict and Social Interaction. New York: Garland, pp. 319–332.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (2000). Do extraterrestrials have sex (and intelligence)? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 164–181.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (2014a). Prestige and the ongoing process of culture revision. In Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Anderson, C., eds., The Psychology of Social Status. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (2014b). Eliciting altruism while avoiding xenophobia: A thought experiment. In Vakoch, D. A., ed., Extraterrestrial Altruism: Evolution and Ethics in the Cosmos. New York: Springer, pp. 17–48.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (2020). The evolutionary psychology of extraterrestrials. In Vakoch, D. A., ed., Extraterrestrial Intelligence: Cognition and Communication in the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., O’Gorman, R., & Rendell, L. (2012). Are the new mass media subverting cultural transmission? Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 121–133.Google Scholar
Blease, C. R. (2015). Too many “friends,” too few “likes”? Evolutionary psychology and “Facebook depression.” Review of General Psychology, 19(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Silk, J. B. (2017). How Humans Evolved, 8th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1992). Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J., eds., The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–266.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2003). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating, revised ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Buss, D., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., & Biaggio, A. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.Google Scholar
Cocconi, G., & Morrison, P. (1959). Searching for interstellar communications. Nature, 184(4690), 844–866.Google Scholar
Cronin, H., Curry, O., & Singer, P. (1999). Darwinism Today: Natural Politics: A Darwinian Agenda for the Left. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson General.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 1st ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1874). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed. London: Charles Murray.Google Scholar
Dick, S. J. (1999). The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1963). Cultural direction of human evolution. Human Biology, 35, 311–316.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1962). The growth of culture and the evolution of mind. In Scher, J. M., ed., Theories of Mind. Glencoe: Free Press, pp. 713–740.Google Scholar
Korb, J. (2003). Thermoregulation and ventilation of termite mounds. Naturwissenschaften, 90(5), 212–219.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Langdon, J. H. (2016). The Science of Human Evolution. New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Lehman, J., Clune, J., Misevic, D., et al. (2018). The surprising creativity of digital evolution: A collection of anecdotes from the evolutionary computation and artificial life research communities. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01735473.Google Scholar
Levin, S. R., Scott, T. W., Cooper, H. S., & West, S. A. (2019). Darwin’s aliens. International Journal of Astrobiology, 18(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2000). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped Human Nature. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Reynolds, V., Falger, V., & Vine, I., eds. (1987). The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism. Evolutionary Dimensions of Xenophobia, Discrimination, Racism and Nationalism. London/Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
ScienceDaily (2009). Parasites may have had role in evolution of sex. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090706171542.htm.Google Scholar
Thienpont, K., & Cliquet, R. (1999). In-Group/Out-Group Behaviour in Modern Societies: An Evolutionary Perspective, Brussels: Vlaamse Gemeenschap.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. F. C. (1961). The psychic unity of human groups. In Kaplan, B., ed., Studying Personality Cross-Culturally. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 129–163.Google Scholar
Yuki, M., & Yokota, K. (2009). The primal warrior: Outgroup threat priming enhances intergroup discrimination in men but not women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 271–274.Google Scholar