Århammer, Nils, 2007. Das Nordfriesische, eine bedrohte Minderheitssprache in zehr Dialekten: Eine Bestandsaufnahme. In Munske, Horst Haider (ed.), Sterben die Dialekte aus? Vorträge am interdisziplinären Zentrum für Dialektforschung an der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 22.10 – 10.12 2007. www.dialektforschung.phil.uni-erlangen.de/publikationen/sterben-die-dialekte-aus.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Bandle, Oskar, Braunmüller, Kurt, Jahr, Ernst Håkon, Karker, Allan, Naumann, Hans-Peter and Teleman, Ulf (eds), 2002/2004. The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, two volumes. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Barnes, Michael P., 1998. The Norn Language of Orkney and Shetland. Lerwick: The Shetland Times.Google Scholar

Berend, Nina, 1998. Sprachliche Anpassung: Eine sociolinguistische-dialektologische Untersuchung zum Rußlanddeutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Berend, Nina, 2009. Vom Sprachinseldialekt zur Migrantensprache: Anmerkungen zum Sprachwandel der Einwanderungsgeneration. In Liebert, Wolf-Andreas and Schwinn, Horst (eds), Mit Bezug auf Sprache: Festschrift für Rainer Wimmer, pp. 361–381. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Berend, Nina and Jedig, Hugo, 1991. Deutsche Mundarten in der Sowjetunion: Geschichte der Forschung und Bibliographie. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar

Bergsland, Knut, 1992. Language contacts between Southern Sami and Scandinavian. In Jahr, Ernst Håkon (ed.), Language Contact: Theoretical and Empirical Studies, pp. 5–15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bernini, Giuliano and Ramat, Paolo, 1996. Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe: A Typological Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Biberauer, Teresa, 2009. Afrikaans. In Brown, Keith and Ogilvie, Sarah (eds), Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World, pp. 7–11. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Bidese, Ermenegildo, Dow, James R. and Stolz, Thomas (eds), 2005. Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C., 2009. The Life and Death of Texas German. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Boberg, Charles, 2012. English as a minority language in Quebec. World Englishes 31: 493–502.Google Scholar

Bomhard, Allan R. and Kerns, John C., 1994. The Nostratic Macrofamily: A Study in Distant Linguistic Relationship. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bowerman, Sean, 2004. White South African English: Morphology and Syntax. In Kortmann, Bernd, Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, Schneider, Edgar W. and Upton, Clive (eds), A Handbook of Varieties of English, vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax, pp. 948–961. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brattegard, Olav, 1945. Die mittelniederdeutsche Geschäftssprache des hansischen Kaufmanns zu Bergen, two volumes. Bergen: A. S. John Griegs Boktrykkeri.Google Scholar

Braunmüller, Kurt, 1991. Die skandinavischen Sprachen im Überblick. Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar

Braunmüller, Kurt and House, Juliane (eds), 2009. Convergence and Divergence in Language Contact Situations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2006. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Matras, , McMahon, and Vincent, (eds), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlie, Johan, 1925. Studium über die mittelniederdeutsche Urkundensprache der dänischen Köningskanzlei von 1330–1430 nebst einer Übersicht über die Kanzleiverhältnisse. Lund: Gleerupska Universitetsbokhandeln.Google Scholar

Colleman, Timothy, 2013. ’n Germaanse toebroodjie: Three cases of English influence on the grammar of Afrikaans. Paper at the Germanic Sandwich conference held at the University of Leuven in January 2013.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, 2001. The origin of the Scandinavian languages. In Dahl, and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (eds), vol. 1, pp. 215–235.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, 2009. Issues in complexity as a result of language contact. In Braunmüller, and House, (eds), pp. 41–52.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds), 2001. The Circum-Baltic Languages, two volumes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, 1996. The French Influence on Middle English Morphology: A Corpus-based Study of Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

den Besten, Hans, 1986. Double negation and the genesis of Afrikaans. In Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval (eds), Substrata and Universals in Creole Genesis, pp. 185–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

den Besten, Hans, 1989. From Khoekhoe foreignertalk via hottentot Dutch to Afrikaans: The creation of a novel grammar. In Piitz, Martin and Dirven, René (eds), Wheels within Wheels: Papers of the Duisburg Symposium on Pidgin and Creole Languages, pp. 207–250. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Diercks, Willy, 1993. Zur Verwendung prä- und postmodifizierender Morpheme in Mittelniederdeutschen und in den skandinavischen Sprachen. In Braunmüller, Kurt and Diercks, Willy (eds), Niederdeutsch und die skandinavischen Sprachen, vol. I: pp. 161–194. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Bruce C., 1991. The Influence of English in Afrikaans: A Case Study of Linguistic Change in a Language Contact Situation. Pretoria: Van Schaik.Google Scholar

Drinka, Bridget, 2013. Sources of auxiliation in the perfects of Europe. Studies in Language 37: 599–644.Google Scholar

Durkin, Philip, 2014. Borrowed Words: A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eggers, Eckhard, 1998. Sprachwandel und Sprachmischung im Jiddischen. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph, 2011. English as a North Germanic language: From the Norman Conquest to the present. In Trušnik, Roman, Nemčoková, Katarína and Bell, Gregory Jason (eds), Theories and Practice: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on English and American Studies, pp. 13–26. Zlín: Univerzita Tomáše Bati.Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph Embley and Faarlund, Jan Terje, 2014. English: The Language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar

Faatz, Jan Patrick, 2009. Uwer unse Sprak is nich gut un warn klok ut … : Eine Untersuchung zum Gebrauch des Petuhtantendeutsch in der heutigen flensburger Alltagssprache. Norderstedt: Grin.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, 2002. More on the English progressive and the Celtic connection. In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes III: pp. 150–168. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani and Paulasto, Heli, 2008. English and Celtic in Contact. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani and Pitkänen, Heli (eds), 2002. The Celtic roots of English. Joensuu: Joensuu Yliopistopaino.Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga, 2013. The role of contact in English syntactic change in Old and Middle English periods. In Schreier, and Hundt, (eds), pp. 18–40.Google Scholar

Gadeanu, Sorin, 1998. Sprache auf der Suche: Zur Identitätsfrage des Deutschen in Rumänian am Beispiel der Temerwarer Stadtsprache. Regenburg: Roderer.Google Scholar

Gamillscheg, Ernst, 1934–1936. Romania Germanica: Sprach- und Siedlungsgeschichte der Germanen auf dem Boden des alten Römerreichs, three volumes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gold, David L., 1985. Jewish English. In Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.), Readings in the Sociology of the Jewish Languages, pp. 280–298. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Hancock, Ian, 1992. Roots of inequity: Romani cultural rights in their historical and social context. Immigrants and Minorities 2 (1): 3–20.Google Scholar

Hancock, Ian, 2010. Romani and Angloromani. In Schreier, , Trudgill, , Schneider, and Williams, (eds), pp. 367–383.Google Scholar

Hansen, Björn, 2000. The German modal verb müssen and the Slavonic languages: The reconstruction of a success story. Scando-Slavica 46: 77–93.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 1998. How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20: 271–287.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wolfgang and Raible, Wolfgang (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook / Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien: Ein internationales Handbuch / La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques: Manuel international, pp. 1492–1510. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar, 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A., 1987. The Germanic languages. In Comrie, Bernard (ed.), The World’s Major Languages, pp. 68–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 2006. The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Helgason, Pétur, Ringen, Catherine and Suomi, Kari, 2013. Swedish quantity: Central Standard Swedish and Fenno-Swedish. Journal of Phonetics 41 (6): 534–545.Google Scholar

Hélix, Laurence, 2011. Histoire de la langue française. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar

Hesseling, Dirk C., 1923. Het Afrikaans. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 1999. Ireland as a linguistic area. In Mallory, James P. (ed.), Language in Ulster, pp. 36–53. Special issue of Ulster Folklife 45. Holywood, Co. Down, Northern Ireland: Ulster Folk and Transport Museum.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2007. Irish English: History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (ed.), 2012a. Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012b. Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, pp. 497–507. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hilty, G., 1968. Westfränkische Superstrateinflüsse auf die galloromanische Syntax. In Baldinger, K. (ed.), Festschrift W. v. Wartburg zum 80. Geburtstag, vol. 1, pp. 493–510. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Dietrich, 1955. Nordisch–englische Lehnbeziehungen der Wikingerzeit. Kopenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Ingham, Richard (ed.), 2010. The Anglo-Norman Language and its Contexts. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar

Ingham, Richard, 2012. The Transmission of Anglo-Norman: Language History and Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Neil G., 2001. Yiddish in the Baltic region. In Dahl, and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (eds), vol. 1, pp. 285–311.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Neil G., Prince, Ellen F. and van der Auwera, Johan, 1994. Yiddish. In König, Ekkehard and van der Auwera, Johan (eds), The Germanic Languages, pp. 388–419. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jahr, Ernst Håkon, 2004. The special case of Norway in the twentieth century: language conflict and language planning. In Bandle, s et al. (eds), vol. 2, pp. 1635–1647.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto, 1905. Growth and Structure of the English Language. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto, 1922. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Jones, Mari C., 2010. Channel Island English. In Schreier, , Trudgill, , Schneider, and Williams, (eds), pp. 35–56.Google Scholar

Jones, Morris, 1973. The present condition of the Welsh language. In Stephens, Meic (ed.), The Welsh Language Today, pp. 110–126. Llanddysul: Gomer Press.Google Scholar

Jordan, Sabine, 1995. Niederdeutsches im Lettischen: Untersuchungen zu den mittelniederdeutschen Lehnwörter im Lettischen. Bielefeld: Verlag für Regionalgeschichte.Google Scholar

Kaiser, Georg A. and Scholze, Lenka, 2009. Verbstellung im Sprachkontakt: Das Obersorbische und Bündnerromanische im Kontakt mit dem Deutschen. In Scholze, Lenka and Wiemer, Björn (eds), Von Zuständen, Dynamik und Veränderung bei Pygmäen und Giganten: Festschrift für Walter Breu zu seinem 60. Geburtstag, pp. 305–330. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Götz, 2011. Looking for order in chaos: Standard convergence and divergence in Mennonite Low German. In Putnam, (ed.), pp. 189–230.Google Scholar

Kiefer, Ferenc, 2010. Areal-typological aspects of word-formation: The case of aktionsart-formation in German, Hungarian, Slavic, Baltic, Romani and Yiddish. In Rainer, Franz, Dressler, Wolfgang Y., Kastovsky, Dieter and Luschützky, Hans Christian (eds), Variation and Change in Morphology: Selected Papers from the 13th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna 2008, pp. 129–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

King, Ruth, 2000. The Lexical Basis of Grammatical Borrowing: A Prince Edward Island French Case study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani, 2013. English as a contact language in the British Isles. In Schreier, and Hundt, (eds), pp. 75–87.Google Scholar

Knipf-Komlósi, Elisabeth, 2006. Sprachliche Muster bei Sprachinselsprechern am Beispiel der Ungarndeutschen. In Berend, Nina and Knipf-Komlósi, Elisabeth (eds), Sprachinselwelten: Entwicklung und Beschreibung der deutschen Sprachinseln am Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts / The World of Language Islands: The Developmental Stages and the Description of German Languages Islands at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century, pp. 39–56. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar

Koivulehto, Jorma, 2002. Contact with non-Germanic languages II: Relations to the East. In Bandle, et al. (eds), vol. 1, pp. 583–594.Google Scholar

Kontzi, Reinhold, 1982. Einleitung. In Kontzi, Reinhold (ed.), Substrate und Superstrate in den romanischen Sprachen, pp. 1–27. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Wälchli, Bernhard, 2001. The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Dahl, and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (eds), vol. 2, pp. 615–750.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, 1998. Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera, (ed.), pp. 457–561.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and van der Auwera, Johan (eds), 2011. The Languages and Linguistics of Europe: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Kühl, Karoline H. and Petersen, Hjalmar P., 2009. Converging verbal phrases in related languages: A case study from Faro-Danish and Danish–German language contact situations. In Braunmüller, and House, (eds), pp. 101–124.Google Scholar

Lagman, Herbert, 1971. Svensk–Estnisk Språkkontakt: Studier över estniskans inflytande på de estlandssvenska dialekterna. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Lagman, Svante, Ohlsson, Stig Örjan and Voodla, Viivika (eds), 2002. Svenska språkets historia i Östsjöområdet. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar

Lamiroy, Béatrice, 2011. Degrés de grammaticalisation à travers les langues de même famille. In L’évolution grammaticale à travers les langues romanes, pp. 167–192. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, vol. 19. Peeters.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger and Wright, Susan, 1986. Endogeny vs. contact: ‘Afrikaans influence’ on South African English. English World-Wide 7: 201–223.Google Scholar

Le Coultre, Jean-Jules, 1875. De l’ordre des mots dans Crestien de Troyes. In Ziel, Ernst (ed.), XIV. Programm des Vitzhumschen Gymnasiums, als Einladung zu dem 17. 18 und 19. März 1875 stattfindenden öffentlichen Examen und Redeactus, pp. 5–88. Dresden: Teubner.Google Scholar

Lenz, Alexandra N., Gooskens, Charlotte and Reker, Siemon (eds), 2009. Low Saxon Dialects Across Borders / Niedersächsische Dialekte über Grenze hinweg. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Lindell, Lenny and Thorbjörnsson-Djerf, Kenth, 2008. Ordbok över svensk romani: Resandefolkets språk och sånger. Inledning, grammatik och bearnetning av Gerd Carling. Stockholm: Podium.Google Scholar

Lutz, Angelika, 2002. When did English begin? In Fanego, Teresa, Méndez-Naya, Belén and Seoane, Elena (eds), Sounds, Words, Texts and Change: Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000, pp. 145–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Makhudu, K. Dennis Papi, 2002. An introduction to Flaaitaal (or Tsotsitaal). In Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.), Language in South Africa, pp. 398–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Manherz, Károly and Wild, Katalin, 1987. Zur Sprache und Volkskultur der Ungarndeutschen. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar

Marchello-Nizia, Christiane, 1995. L’évolution du français: Ordre des mots, démonstratifs, accent tonique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Markey, Thomas L., 1969. The Verbs Varda and Bliva in Scandinavian, with Special Emphasis on Swedish. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Markey, Thomas L., 1982. Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole? Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 49: 169–207.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 1991. Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 469–504.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron and Bakker, Peter (eds), 2003. The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and Empirical Advances. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), 2006. Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeannette, 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31: 829–865.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H., 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 19: 217–272.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H., 2008. Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold Story of English. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

Meister Ferré, Barbara, 1994. Stability and Change in the Pennsylvania German Dialect of an Old Order Amish Community in Lancaster County. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Melchers, Gunnel and Sundkvist, Peter, 2010. Orkney and Shetland. In Schreier, , Trudgill, , Schneider, and Williams, (eds), pp. 17–34.Google Scholar

Messner, Dieter, 1997. Einführung in die Geschichte des französischen Wortschatzes. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend, 2002. Endogeny versus contact revisited: Aspectual busy in South African English. Language Sciences 24: 345–358.Google Scholar

Miller, D. Gary, 2012. External Influences on English: From its Beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitterand, Henri, 1968. Les mots français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Mossé, Fernand, 1952. A Handbook of Middle English. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Moulin, Claudine and Nübling, Damaris (eds), 2006. Perspektiven einer linguistischen Luxemburgistik. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Munske, Horst Haider with Århammer, Nils, Faltings, Volkert F., Hoekstra, Jarich F., Vries, Oebele, Walker, Alastair G. H. and Wilds, Ommo (eds), 2001. Handbuch des Friesischen / Handbook of Frisian Studies. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Murelli, Adriano and Kortmann, Bernd, 2011. Non-standard varieties in the areal typology of Europe. In Kortmann, and van der Auwera, (eds), pp. 525–544.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Hans Frede, 1985. Old English and the Continental Germanic Languages. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.Google Scholar

Ohlsson, Stig Örjan, 2004. Language contact in the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries: The Kingdom of Sweden. In Bandle, et al. (eds), vol. 2, pp. 1361–1368.Google Scholar

O’Neil, Wayne, 1978. The evolution of the Germanic inflectional systems: A study in the causes of language change. Orbis 28: 248–286.Google Scholar

Östman, Jan-Ola, 2011. Language contact in the North of Europe. In Kortmann, and van der Auwera, (eds), pp. 359–380.Google Scholar

Otheguy, Ricardo and Zentella, Ana Celia, 2012. Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialect Leveling, and Structural Contiguity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pawischitz, Sabine, 2009. Deutsche Lehnwörter in der burgenlandkroatischen Umgangssprache. In Scholze, Lenka and Wiemer, Björn (eds), Von Zuständen, Dynamik und Veränderung bei Pygmäen und Giganten: Festschrift für Walter Breu zu seinem 60. Geburtstag, pp. 331–346. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Karen Margrethe, 2000. German as first language and minority second language in Denmark. In Hogan-Brun, Gabrielle (ed.), National Varieties of German outside Germany: A European Perspective, pp. 195–220. Oxford: Lang.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Karen Margrethe, 2009. South Schleswig Danish: A border-regional minority language. In Lenz, , Gooskens, and Reker, (eds), pp. 297–316.Google Scholar

Picoche, Jacqueline and Marchello-Nizia, Christiane, 1994. Histoire de la langue française. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Polanska, Ineta, 2002. Zum Einfluss des Lettischen auf das Deutsche im Baltikum. Inaugural dissertation, Otto-Friedrich-Universität, Bamberg.Google Scholar

Polomé, Edgar C., 1972. Germanic and the other Indo-European languages. In Van Coetsem, Frans and Kufner, Herbert L. (eds), Toward a Grammar of Proto-Germanic, pp. 43–69. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, 2008. Quebec English. Anglistik 19: 189–200.Google Scholar

Putnam, Michael T. (ed.), 2011. Studies on German-Language Islands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raidt, Edith H., 1983. Einführung in Geschichte und Struktur des Afrikaans. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Rainsford, T. M., Guillot, Céline, Lavrentiev, Alexei and Prévost, Sophie, 2012. La zone préverbale en ancien français: apport des corpus annotés. In Neveu, Franck, Toke, Valelia Muni, Bluenthal, Peter et al. (eds), Congrès mondial de linguistique française, pp. 159–176. www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/abs/2012/01/shsconf_cmlf12_000246/shsconf_cmlf12_000246.htmlGoogle Scholar

Reershemius, Gertrud, 2007. Reste des Westjiddischen in niederdeutschen Sprachgebiet. In Fandrych, Christian and Salverda, Reinier (eds), Standard, Variation und Sprachwandel in germanischen Sprachen, pp. 241–264. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Roberge, Paul, 2010. Contact and the history of Germanic languages. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 406–431. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Roca, Ana and Lipski, John M. (eds), 1993. Spanish in the United States: Linguistic Contact and Diversity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Scheler, Manfred, 1977. Der englische Wortschatz. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar

Scholze, Lenka, 2008. Das grammatische System der obersorbischen Umgangssprache im Sprachkontakt. Bautzen: Sorbisches Institut.Google Scholar

Schreier, Daniel and Hundt, Marianne (eds), 2013. English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schreier, Daniel, Trudgill, Peter, Schneider, Edgard W. and Williams, Jeffrey P. (eds), 2010. The Lesser-known Varieties of English: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seip, Didrik Arup, 1931. Hvad norsk språk gav, og hvad det fikk i middelalderen. In Norge og Europa i middelalderen, pp. 88–103. Oslo: Ashehaug.Google Scholar

Smith, Johannes J., 1952. Theories about the Origin of Afrikaans. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar

Smits, Ton F. H., 2009. Prinzipien der Dialektresistenz: Zur Bestimmung einer dialektalen Abbauhierarchie. In Lenz, , Gooskens, and Reker, (eds), pp. 297–338.Google Scholar

Spence, N. C. W., 1984. Channel Island French. In Trudgill (ed.), pp. 345–351.Google Scholar

Stenson, Nancy, 1993. English influence on Irish: The last 100 years. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 2: 107–128.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, 2006. All or nothing. In Matras, , McMahon, and Vincent, (eds), pp. 32–50.Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard, 1972. Yiddish verb prefixes between Germanic and Slavic. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 231–250.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Townend, Matthew, 2012. Contacts and conflicts: Latin, Norse and French. In Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.), The Oxford History of English, updated edition, pp. 75–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard L. C., 1999. How Celtic is Standard English? St Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard L. C., 2002. Attrition of inflections in English and Welsh. In Filppula, , Klemola, and Pitkänen, (eds), pp. 111–149.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, Nicolai S., 1930. Proposition 16. In Actes du premier congrès international des linguistes à la Haye, du 10–15 avril 1928, pp. 17–18. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter (ed.), 1984. Languages in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Bree, Cor and Versloot, Arjen P. with Bremmer, Rolf H. Jr, 2008. Oorsprongen van het Stadsfries: With an extensive summary. Ljouwert: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar

Van Coetsem, Frans, 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 1998a. Phasal adverbials in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera, (ed.), pp. 25–145.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 1998b. Conclusion. In van der Auwera, (ed.), pp. 813–836.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan (ed.) with Ó Baoill, Dónall P. (ed.), 1998c. Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 2011. Standard Average European. In Kortmann, and van der Auwera, (eds), pp. 291–306.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan and Genee, Inge, 2002. English do: On the convergence of languages and linguists. English Language and Linguistics 6: 283–307.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, Schalley, Ewa and Nuyts, Jan, 2005. Epistemic possibility in a Slavonic parallel corpus: A pilot study. In Hansen, Björn and Karlík, Petr (eds), Modality in Slavonic Languages, pp. 201–217. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar

Van Ness, Silke, 1990. Changes in an Obsolescing Language: Pennsylvania German in West Virginia. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

van Rensburg, M. C. J., 1983. Nie-standaardvorme, variasiepatrone en Afrikaans uit de vorige eeu. In Claassen, G. N. and van Rensburg, M. C. J. (eds), Taalverskeidenheid: ’n Blik op die Spektrum van taalvariasie in Afrikaans, pp. 134–161. Pretoria: Academica.Google Scholar

van Rensburg, Christo, 2012. So Kry Ons Afrikaans. Pretoria: Lapa.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo, gen. Nierfeld, 2003. Europa Vasconica – Europa Semitica, edited by Hanna, Patrizia Noel Aziz. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo, gen. Nierfeld, 2012. Germania Semitica, edited by Hanna, Patrizia Noel Aziz. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

von Wartburg, Walther, 1946. Problèmes et méthodes de la linguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

von Wartburg, Walther, 1967. La fragmentation linguistique de la Romania. Paris: Klincksieck. Translation of 1950, Die Ausgliederung der Romanischen Sprachräume, Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard, 2011. The Circum-Baltic languages. In Kortmann, and van der Auwera, (eds), pp. 325–340.Google Scholar

Walker, Alistair H., 2001. Extent and position of North Frisian. In Munske, (ed.), pp. 263–284.Google Scholar

Walter, Henriette, 1994. L’Aventure des langues en Occident: Leur origine, leur histoire, leur géographie. Paris: Laffont.Google Scholar

Weerman, Fred, 2006. It’s the economy, stupid! Een vergelijkende blik op men en man. In Hüning, Matthias, Vogel, Ulrike, van der Wouden, Ton and Verhagen, Arie (eds), Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels, pp. 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar

Wehr, Barbara, 2001. Ein west-atlantischer Sprachbund: Irish, Französisch, Portugiesisch. In Eichner, Heiner, Mumm, Peter-Arnold, Panagl, Oswald and Winkler, Eberhard (eds), Fremd und Eigen: Untersuchungen zu Grammatik und Wortschatz des Uralischen und Indogermanischen in memoriam Hartmut Katz, pp. 253–278. Vienna: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, 1958a. Yiddish and colonial German in Eastern Europe: The differential impact of Slavic. In American Contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavicists, Moscow, September 1958, pp. 369–421. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U., 1958b. On the compatibility of genetic relationship and convergent development. Word 14: 374–379.Google Scholar

Wessén, Elias, 1929. Om det tyska inflytandet på svenskt språk under medeltiden. Nordisk tidskrift för vetenskap, konst och industri utgiven af Letterstedtska föreningen 5: 265–280.Google Scholar

Wexler, Paul, 2002. Two-tiered Relexification in Yiddish. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

White, David L., 2002. Explaining the innovations of Middle English: What, where and why. In Filppula, , Klemola, and Pitkänen, (eds), pp. 153–174.Google Scholar

Wiik, Kalevi, 1997. The Uralic and Finno-Ugric phonetic substratum in Proto-Germanic. Linguistica Uralica 33: 258–280.Google Scholar

Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn with Collette, Carolyn, Kowalski, Maryanne, Mooney, Linne, Putter, Ann and Trotter, David (eds), 2009. Language and Culture in Medieval Britain: The French of England c. 1100 – c. 1500. Woodbridge, UK: York Medieval Press and Boydell Press.Google Scholar

Worren, Dagfinn, 2004. Interscandinavian language contact II: Linguistic influence. In Bandle, et al. (eds), vol. 2, pp. 2032–2048.Google Scholar

Adger, David, 2010. Gaelic syntax. In Watson, Moray and Macleod, Michelle (eds), The Edinburgh Companion to the Gaelic Language, pp. 304–351. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Ahlqvist, Anders, 2010. Early Celtic and English. Australian Celtic Journal 9: 43–73.Google Scholar

Aitken, A. J., 1981. The Scottish vowel-length rule. In Benskin, Michael and Samuels, Michael (eds), So Meny People, Longages and Tonges: Philological Essays in Scots and Medieval English Presented to Angus McIntosh, pp. 131–157. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte, 2002. Negation in Non-standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations and Asymmetries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte, 2009. The Morphology of English Dialects: Verb-formation in Non-standard English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan and Genee, Inge, 2002. English do: On the convergence of languages and linguists. English Language and Linguistics 6: 283–307.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C., 1993. The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Milroy, and Milroy, (eds), pp. 187–213.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C., 2008. English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 122–144.Google Scholar

Bliss, Alan J., 1972. Languages in contact: Some problems of Hiberno-English. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Section C, 72: 63–82.Google Scholar

Braaten, Björn, 1967. Notes on continuous tenses in English. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 21: 167–180.Google Scholar

Britain, David, 2012. English in England. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 23–52.Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle, Corrigan, Karen, Holmberg, Anders, Honeybone, Patrick and Maguire, Warren, 2013. T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics 17 (1): 85–128.Google Scholar

Burchfield, Robert W., 1994a. Introduction. In Burchfield, (ed.), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Burchfield, Robert W. (ed.), 1994b. English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Butters, Ronald R., 2001. Grammatical structure. In Algeo, John (ed.), English in North America, pp. 325–339. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Alistair, 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Nora, 1963. The British or Celtic part in the population of England. In Angles and Britons (The O’Donnell Lectures), pp. 111–147. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Claridge, Claudia and Kytö, Merja, 2010. Non-standard language in earlier English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Varieties of English in Writing: The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence, pp. 15–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Clarke, Sandra, 2004. The legacy of British and Irish English in Newfoundland. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects, pp. 242–261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dal, Ingerid, 1952. Zur Entstehung des Englischen Participium Praesentis auf -ing. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 16: 5–116.Google Scholar

Davies, Norman, 1999. The Isles: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Denison, David, 1985. The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In Eaton, Roger et al. (eds), Papers from the 4th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, pp. 44–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dobson, E. J., 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, vol. 1: Survey of the Sources, vol. 2: Phonology, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, Viv, 1993. The grammar of Southern British English. In Milroy, and Milroy, (eds), pp. 214–238.Google Scholar

Ekwall, Eilert, 1975. A History of Modern English Sounds and Morphology, translated by Ward, A.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ellegård, Alvar, 1953. The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English. Gothenburg Studies in English, vol. 2. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar

Evans, D. Simon, 1976. A Grammar of Middle Welsh. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, 1997. Cross-dialectal parallels and language contacts: Evidence from Celtic Englishes. In Hickey, Raymond and Puppel, Stanisław (eds), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, pp. 943–957. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, 1999. The Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku and Klemola, Juhani (eds), 2009. Re-evaluating the Celtic Hypothesis. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics 13 (2).Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku and Klemola, Juhani, 2012. Celtic and Celtic Englishes. In Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel (eds), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, pp. 1687–1703. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani and Paulasto, Heli, 2008. English and Celtic in Contact. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerry (eds), 1999. Urban voices: Overview. In Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerry (eds), Urban Voices, pp. 1–24. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Garrett, Andrew, 1998. On the origin of auxiliary do. English Language and Linguistics 2: 283–330.Google Scholar

Genee, Inge, 2005. Latin influence on Old Irish? Contact linguistics and the study of medieval language contact. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 9: 33–72.Google Scholar

Goose, Nigel et al. (eds), 2005. Immigrants in Tudor and Early Stuart England. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar

Harris, John, 1984. English in the North of Ireland. In Trudgill, (ed.), pp. 115–134.Google Scholar

Harris, John, 1993. The grammar of Irish English. In Milroy, and Milroy, (eds), pp. 139–186.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 1999. External possession in a European areal perspective. In Wayne, Doris and Barshi, Immanuel (eds), External Possession, pp. 109–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hernández, Nuria, Kolbe, Daniela and Schulz, Monika Edith, 2011. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects, vol. 2: Modals, Pronouns and Complement Clauses. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 1984a. On the nature of labial velar shift. Journal of Phonetics 12: 345–354.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 1984b. Syllable onsets in Irish English. Word 35: 67–74.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 1995. Early contact and parallels between English and Celtic. Vienna English Working Papers 4 (2): 87–119.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 1997. Arguments for creolisation in Irish English. In Hickey, Raymond and Puppel, Stanisław (eds), Language History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, pp. 969–1038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2003. Rectifying a standard deficiency: Pronominal distinctions in varieties of English. In Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, pp. 345–374. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series, vol. 107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2004. A Sound Atlas of Irish English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2005. Dublin English: Evolution and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2007. Irish English: History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2008. Feature loss in 19th century Irish English. In Nevalainen, Terttu, Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi and Korhonen, Minna (eds), The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, pp. 229–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2009. Weak segments in Irish English. In Minkova, Donka (ed.), Phonological Weakness in English: From Old to Present-day English, pp. 116–129. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2010. Attitudes and concerns in eighteenth-century English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and Change, pp. 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2011. The Dialects of Irish, Study of a Changing Landscape. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012a. English in Ireland. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 79–107. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012b. Internally and externally motivated language change. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, pp. 401–421. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012c. Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, pp. 497–507. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012d. Assessing the role of contact in the history of English. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, pp. 485–496. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (ed.), 2012e. Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (ed.), 2012f. Standards of English: Codified Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2013a. Supraregionalisation and dissociation. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, second edition, pp. 537–554. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2013b. English as a contact language in Ireland and Scotland. In Schreier, Daniel and Hundt, Marianne (eds), English as a Contact Language, pp. 88–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2014. A Dictionary of Varieties of English. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2015. The North of England and Northern English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Researching Northern English, pp. 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Holthausen, Friedrich, 1974. Altenglisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, second edition. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Honeybone, Patrick, 2007. New-dialect formation in nineteenth century Liverpool: A brief history of Scouse. In Grant, Anthony and Grey, Clive (eds), The Mersey Sound: Liverpool’s Language, People and Places, pp. 106–140. Liverpool: Open House Press.Google Scholar

Ihalainen, Ossi, 1994. The dialects of England since 1776. In Burchfield, (ed.), pp. 197–274.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto, 1940 [1909]. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 6 vols. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Jones, Mark J., 2002. The origin of Definite Article Reduction in northern English dialects: Evidence from dialect allomorphy. English Language and Linguistics 6: 325–345.Google Scholar

Jones, Morris and Thomas, Alan R., 1977. The Welsh Language: Studies in its Syntax and Semantics. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Keller, Wolfgang, 1925. Keltisches im englischen Verbum. In Anglica: Untersuchungen zur englischen Philologie, vol. 1: Sprache und Kulturgeschichte. Leipzig: Mayer und Müller, pp. 55–66.Google Scholar

King, Gareth, 1993. Modern Welsh: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani, 2000. The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact? In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, pp. 329–346. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani, 2002. Periphrastic DO: Dialectal distributions and origins. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani and Pitkänen, Heli (eds), The Celtic Roots of English, pp. 199–210. Joensuu: University of Joensuu: Faculty of Humanities.Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani, 2013. English as a contact language in the British Isles. In Schreier, Daniel and Hundt, Marianne (eds), English as a Contact Language, pp. 75–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani and Filppula, Markku, 1992. Subordinating uses of ‘and’ in the history of English. In Rissaneni, Matti, Ihalainen, Ossi and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds), History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, pp. 310–318. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds), 2012. The Mouton Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, Herrmann, Tanja, Pietsch, Lukas and Wagner, Susanne, 2005. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects, vol. 1: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds), 2008. Varieties of English, vol. 1: The British Isles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger, 1987. The Shape of English: Structure and History. London: Dent.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian and Smith, Nicholas, 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lutz, Angelika, 2009. Celtic influence on Old English and West Germanic. In Filppula, and Klemola, (eds), pp. 227–249.Google Scholar

Maguire, Warren, 2012. English and Scots in Scotland. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 53–77.Google Scholar

Matasović, Ratko, 2007. Insular Celtic as a language area. In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Languages in Contact, pp. 93–112. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press.Google Scholar

McClure, J. Derrick, 1994. English in Scotland. In Burchfield, (ed.), pp. 23–93.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H., 2009. What else happened to English? A brief for the Celtic hypothesis. In Filppula, and Klemola, (eds), pp. 163–191.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend, 1992. English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley (eds), 1993. Real English: The Grammar of the English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Bruce and Robinson, Fred, 2007. A Guide to Old English, seventh edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mittendorf, Ingo and Poppe, Erich, 2000. Celtic contacts of the English progressive? In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, pp. 117–145. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Michael, 2001. British and Irish antecedents. In Algeo, John (ed.), English in North America, pp. 86–153. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Michael and Gregg, Robert, 1997. The Scots language in Ulster. In Jones, Charles (ed.), The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language, pp. 569–622. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Mossé, Ferdinand, 1938. Histoire de la Forme Périphrastique Être + Participe Présent en Germanique, part 2: Moyen-Anglais et Anglais Moderne. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Penhallurick, Robert, 2008a. Welsh English: Phonology. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 105–121.Google Scholar

Penhallurick, Robert, 2008b. Welsh English: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 360–372.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali, 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Poussa, Patricia, 1990. A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration of OE–Celtic contact. In Adamson, Sylvia, Law, Vivien, Vincent, Nigel and Wright, Susan (eds), Papers from the Fifth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, pp. 407–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preußler, Walter, 1938. Keltischer Einfluß im Englischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 56: 178–191.Google Scholar

Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, 2005. The diffusion of subject YOU: A case study in historical sociolinguistics. Language Variation and Change 17: 55–73.Google Scholar

Rockel, Martin, 1989. Grundzüge einer Geschichte der irischen Sprache [Outline of a History of the Irish Language]. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Bernard et al. (eds), 2009. Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rupp, Laura and Page-Verhoeff, Hanne, 2005. Pragmatic and historical aspects of Definite Article Reduction in northern English dialects. English World-Wide 26 (3): 325–346.Google Scholar

Sabban, Annette, 1982. Gälisch–Englischer Sprachkontakt [Gaelic–English Language Contact]. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar

Sabban, Annette, 1985. On the variability of Hebridean English syntax: The verbal group. In Görlach, Manfred (ed.), Focus on Scotland, pp. 125–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Schreier, Daniel, 2005. Consonant Change in English Worldwide: Synchrony Meets Diachrony. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Shuken, Cynthia, 1984. Highland and Island English. In Trudgill, (ed.), pp. 152–166.Google Scholar

Singler, John (ed.), 1990. Pidgin and Creole Tense-Mood-Aspect Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, 2012. Typological profile: L1 varieties. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 827–842.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Kortmann, Bernd, 2008. Vernacular universals and Angloversals in a typological perspective. In Filppula, Markku and Klemola, Juhani (eds), Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts, pp. 33–53. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik, 2008. Rural southern white accents. In Schneider, Edgar W. (eds), Varieties of English, vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, pp. 87–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tolkien, John R. R., 1963. English and Welsh. In Angles and Britons (The O’Donnell Lectures), pp. 1–41. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Tristram, Hildegard L. C., 1997. Do-periphrasis in contact? In Ramisch, Heinrich and Wynne, Kenneth J. (eds), Language in Time and Space: Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, pp. 401–417. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter (ed.), 1984. Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter, 1998. Third-person singular zero: African American Vernacular English, East Anglian dialects and Spanish persecution in the Low Countries. Folia Linguistica Historica 18 (1/2): 139–148.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter, 2002. Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter, 2008. The dialect of East Anglia. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 178–193.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter, 2009. Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David and Trudgill, Peter (eds), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, pp. 98–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter, 2010. What really happened to Old English? In Trudgill, Peter, Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics: Stories of Colonisation and Contact, pp. 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Upton, Clive and Widdowson, John D. A., 2006. An Atlas of English Dialects, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vennemann, Theo, 2002. On the rise of ‘Celtic’ syntax in Middle English. In Lucas, Peter and Lucas, Angela (eds), From Tongue to Text: Papers from the Third International Conference on Middle English: University College Dublin, 1–4 July 1999, pp. 203–234. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Visser, Federicus T., 1963–1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, four volumes. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar

Wagner, Heinrich, 1959. Das Verbum in den Sprachen der britischen Inseln [The Verb in the Languages of the British Isles]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Wagner, Susanne, 2008. English dialects in the South-West: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, and Upton, (eds), pp. 417–439.Google Scholar

Wagner, Susanne, 2012. Pronominal systems. In Hickey, (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 379–408.Google Scholar

Wakelin, Martyn, 1984. Rural dialects in England. In Trudgill, (ed.), pp. 70–93.Google Scholar

Wakelin, Martyn, 1986. The Southwest of England. Varieties of English Around the World, Text Series, vol. 5. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wakelin, Martyn, 1988. The phonology of South-Western English 1500–1700. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, pp. 609–644. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Watson, Kevin and Clark, Lynn, 2016. The origins of Liverpool English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Listening to the Past: Audio Records of Accents of English, pp. 113–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Stephen, 1980. A Welsh Grammar. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar

Winford, Donald, 2005. Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22 (2): 373–427.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte, 2012. Negation in varieties of English. In Hickey, (ed.), pp. 299–328.Google Scholar

Brato, Thorsten and Huber, Magnus, 2012. Areal features of English in Africa. In Hickey, (ed.), pp. 161–185.Google Scholar

Eberle, Nicole and Schreier, Daniel, 2013. African Bermudian English and the Caribbean connection. English World-Wide 34: 279–304.Google Scholar

Faraclas, Nicholas, 2012. Nigerian Pidgin. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 407–432.Google Scholar

Hackert, Stephanie, 2012. The Caribbean. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 704–732.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012a. Introduction: Areal features of the anglophone world. In Hickey, (ed.), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (ed.), 2012b. Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Huber, Magnus, 2012. Africa. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 806–823.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, 2012. The British Isles. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 679–702.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, 2013. How powerful is geography as an explanatory factor of variation? Areal features in the Anglophone world. In Auer, Peter, Hilpert, Martin, Stukenbrock, Anja and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (eds), Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives, pp. 165–194. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds), 2012a. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin, 2012b. Introduction. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Wolk, Christoph, 2012. Morphosyntactic variation in the anglophone world: A global perspective. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 906–936.Google Scholar

Lunkenheimer, Kerstin, 2012. Tense and aspect. In Hickey, (ed.), pp. 329–353.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend, 2012. Asia. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 784–805.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend and Bhatt, Rakesh M., 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Michael B., 2008. Appalachian English: Morphology and syntax. In Schneider, Edgar (ed.), Handbook of Varieties of English, vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, pp. 428–467. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar, 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar W., 2012. North America. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 734–762.Google Scholar

Siegel, Jeff, 2012. Australia Pacific region. In Kortmann, and Lunkenheimer, (eds), pp. 764–782.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, 2013. Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects: A Study in Corpus-Based Dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wagner, Susanne, 2012. Pronominal systems. In Hickey, (ed.), pp. 379–408.Google Scholar

Wolk, Christoph, 2013. Integrating Aggregational and Probabilistic Approaches to Dialectology and Language Variation. PhD thesis, University of Freiburg, Germany.Google Scholar

Abondolo, Daniel (ed.), 1997a. The Uralic Languages. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Abondolo, Daniel, 1997b. Introduction. In Abondolo, (ed.), pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

Alexiou, Margaret, 2002. After Antiquity: Greek Language, Myth, and Metaphor. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, Henning, 1996. Reconstructing Prehistorical Dialects: Initial Vowels in Slavic and Baltic. Trends in Linguistics, vol. 91. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Anthony, David, 1990. Migration in archeology: The baby and the bathwater. American Anthropologist 92: 895–914.Google Scholar

Barford, P. M., 2001. The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Baxter, William H., 1992. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Berger, Tilman, 2014. The convergence of Czech and German between the years 900 and 1500. In Besters-Dilger, et al. (eds), pp. 189–198.Google Scholar

Besters-Dilger, Juliane, Dermarkar, Cynthia, Pfänder, Stefan and Rabus, Achim (eds), 2014. Congruence in Contact-induced Language Change: Language Families, Typological Resemblance, and Perceived Similarity. Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Language and Literature, Linguae & Litterae, vol. 27. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bickell, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna, 2006. Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 32. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

de Boel, Gunnar, 2008. The genesis of clitic doubling from Ancient to Medieval Greek. In Kallulli, and Tasmowski, (eds), pp. 89–103.Google Scholar

Brüske, Wolfgang, 1955. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Lutizenbundes: Deutsch-wendische Beziehungen des 10.–12. Jahrhunderts. Mitteldeutsche Forschungen, vol. 3. Münster: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Butt, John and Benjamin, Carmen, 2004. A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, fourth edition. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Curta, Florin, 2011. The Edinburgh History of the Greeks, c. 500 to 1050: the Early Middle Ages. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, 2001. The origin of the Scandinavian languages. In Dahl, Östen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds), The Circum-Baltic Languages, vol. 1: Past and Present: Typology and Contact, pp. 215–236. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Damme, Robert, 1987. Westslavische Reliktwörter in Stralsunder Vokabular. In Ureland, P. Sture (ed.), Sprachkontakt in der Hanse: Aspekte des Sprachausgleichs im Ostsee- und Nordseeraum. Akten der 7. Internationalen Symposions über Sprachkontakt in Europa, Lübeck 1986, pp. 163–178. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Eliot, C. N. E., 1890. A Finnish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Emeneau, M. B., 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 3–16.Google Scholar

Endzelin, J., 1901. Ursprung und Gebrauch des lettischen Debitivs. Beiträge zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen (Bezzenbergers Beiträge) 26: 66–74.Google Scholar

Feldbrugge, F. J. M., 2009. Law in Medieval Russia. Leiden and Boston: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor, 2008. Balkan object reduplication in areal and dialectological perspective. In Kallulli, and Tasmowski, (eds), pp. 33–64.Google Scholar

Gebauer, Jan, 1929. Historická mluvnice českého jazyka, vol. 4: Skladba [Historical Grammar of Czech: Syntax]. Prague: Česká Akademie Vĕd a Umĕní.Google Scholar

Gimbutas, Marija, 1971. The Slavs. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Gippius, A. A., 1996. ‘Russkaja Pravda’ i ‘Voprošanie Kirika’ v Novgorodskoj Kormčej 1282 g. (k xarakteristike jazykovoj situacii drevnego Novgoroda) [‘Russian Law Code’ and ‘Kirik’s Questions’ in the Novgorod Nomocanon of 1282 (toward a characterization of the language situation of Old Novgorod)]. Slavjanovedenie 1996.1: 48–62.Google Scholar

Hill, Jane, 2001. Languages on the ground: Toward an anthropological dialectology. In Terrell, John Edward (ed.), Archeology, Language, and History: Essays on Culture and Ethnicity, pp. 257–282. Westport, CT and London: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra A., 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56 (2): 251–299.Google Scholar

Jablonskis, Jonas, 1922. Lietuvių kalbos gramatika. Etimologija: Vidurinėms mokslo įstaigoms [Grammar of Lithuanian Etymology: For Institutions of Secondary Education], second edition. Kaunas: Švyturio bendrovės leidinys.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, 1931. K xarakteristike evrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza [Toward the Characterization of the Eurasian Linguistic Area]. Paris: Izd. Evraziitsev. Reprinted in 1962, Selected Writings, vol. 1: Phonological Studies, pp. 144–201, The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Johansen, Paul and von zur Mühlen, Heinz, 1973. Deutsch und Undeutsch im mittelalterlichen und frühneuzeitlichen Reval. Ostmitteleuropa in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, vol. 15. Köln: Böhlau, 1973.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive: A Study in Areal, General, and Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2010. Language contact in the Balkans. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 619–633. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kallulli, Dalina and Tasmowski, Liliane, 2008. Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages. Linguistik aktuell, vol. 130. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kantzow, Thomas, 1816. Pomerania, oder, Ursprunck, Altheit und Geschicht der Völcker und Lande Pomern, Cassuben, Wenden, Stettin, Rhügen in vierzehn Büchern, edited by Rosengarten, Hans Gottfried Ludwig, vol. 1. Greifswald: Mauritins.Google Scholar

Koškins, Igors, 1996. Deutsches Lehngut in den altrussischen Novgoroder Urkunden. In Brandt, Gisela (ed.), Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache im Baltikum, pp. 87–98. Stuttgart: Hans Dieter Heinz.Google Scholar

Kuz´mina, I. B. and Nemčenko, E. V., 1971. Sintaksis pričastnyx form v russkix govorax [The Syntax of Participial Forms in Russian Dialects]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Laca, Brenda, 2006. El objeto directo: La marcación preposicional [The direct object: Prepositional marking]. In Company, Concepción Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española, part 1: La frase verbal [Historical Syntax of Spanish: The Verb Phrase], pp. 423–478. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar

Lorentz, Friedrich, 1903. Slovinzische Grammatik. St Petersburg: Vtoroe Otdelenie Imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar

Lübben, August, 1888. Mittelniederdeutsches Handwörterbuch. Nach dem Tode des Verfassers vollendet von Christoph Walther. Norden: D. Soltau.Google Scholar

McAnallen, Julia, 2011. The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Merrill, Jessica, 2012. The Role of Folklore Study in the Rise of Russian Formalist and Czech Structuralist Literary Theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Obolensky, Dimitri, 1971. The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500–1453. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Orzechowska, Hanna, 1973. Podwajanie dopełnień w historii bułgarskiego języka literackiego [Object doubling in the history of the Bulgarian literary language]. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

Otsmaa, Lilia, 1975. O russkix zaimstvovanijax v baltijskom nižnenemeckom jazyke [On Russian borrowings in Baltic Low German]. Linguistica 6: 86–113.Google Scholar

Schick, Ivanka, 2000. Clitic doubling constructions in Balkan–Slavic languages. In Beukema, Frits and den Dikken, Marcel (eds), Clitic Phenomena in European Languages, pp. 259–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Stoianovich, Traian, 1960. The conquering Balkan Orthodox merchant. The Journal of Economic History 20: 234–313.Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Tsendina, Anna, Karlsson, Anastasia and Franzén, Vivan, 2005. The Phonology of Mongolian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Timberlake, Alan, 1974. The Nominative Object in Slavic, Baltic, and West Finnic. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar

Tomić, Olga, 2004. The Balkan Sprachbund: Introduction. In Tomić, Olga (ed.), Balkan Syntax and Semantics, pp. 1–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Toporov, V. N. and Trubačev, O. N., 1962. Lingvističeskij analiz gidronimov Verxnego Podneprov´ja [Linguistic Analysis of Hydronyms of the Upper Dnepr Region]. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Vasmer, Max, 1941. Die Slaven in Griechenland. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Văžarova, Živka N., 1965. Slavjanski i slavjanobălgarski selišta v bălgarskite zemi VI–XI vek [Slavic and Slavobulgarian Settlements on Bulgarian Territory from the Sixth through the Eleventh Century]. Sofia: Bălgarska Akademija na Naukite.Google Scholar

Veenker, Wolfgang, 1967. Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache. Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 82. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Viitso, Tiit-Rein, 1997. Estonian. In Abondolo, (ed.), pp. 115–148.Google Scholar

VoprKir, 1888. Voprosy Kirika, Savvy i Il´i, s otvetami Nifonta, episkopa Novgorodskogo, i drugix ierarxičeskix lic, no. 2: Pamjatniki drevne-russkogo kanoničeskogo prava, pt. 1. Russkaja istoričeskaja biblioteka, izdavaemaja Arxeografičeskoj Kommissiej, vol. 6. [The Questions of Kirik, Savva, and Ilja, with Answers of Nifont, Bishop of Novgorod, and of Other Clerics. Monuments of Old Russian Canon Law. Russian Historical Library, published by the Archaeographic Commission]. St Petersburg.Google Scholar

Vryonis, Spiros, 1981. The evolution of Slavic society and the Slavic invasions in Greece: The first major Slavic attack on Thessaloniki, A.D. 597. Hesperia 50: 378–390.Google Scholar

Wiemer, Björn, Seržant, Ilja and Erker, Aksana, 2014. Convergence in the Baltic–Slavic contact zone: Triangulation approach. In Besters-Dilger, et al. (eds), pp. 15–42.Google Scholar

Willis, David, 2013. Negation in the history of the Slavonic languages. In Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher and Breitbarth, Anne (eds), The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, vol. 1: Case Studies, pp. 341–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Witte, Hans, 1906. Wendische Zu- und Familiennamen aus mecklenburgischen Urkunden und Akten gesammelt und mit Unterstützung des Herrn Prof. Dr. Ernst Mucke zu Freiberg (Sachsen) bearbeitet. Mecklenburgischer Jahrbücher, Verein für Mecklenburgische Geschichte und Altertumskunde 71: 153–290.Google Scholar

Zaicz, Gábor, 1997. Mordva. In Abondolo, (ed.), pp. 184–218.Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, Andrej A., 2004. Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt, 2-e izd., pererabotannoe s učetom materiala naxodok 1995–2003 gg. [Old Novgorod Dialect, second edition, revised with consideration of finds 1995–2003]. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul′tury.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, Robert M. W., 2001. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alekseev, Mikhail E., 1994a. Budukh. In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 259–296.Google Scholar

Alekseev, Mikhail E., 1994b. Rutul. In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 213–258.Google Scholar

Alekseev, Mikhail E., Klimov, Georgij A., Starostin, Sergei A. and Testelets, Yakov G. (eds), 1999. Jazyki Mira: Kavkazskie Jazyki [Languages of the World: Caucasian Languages]. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar

Alekseev, Mikhail E. and Radjabov, Ramazan, 2004. Tsez. In Job, (ed.), pp. 115–163.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory, 1997. Lak phonology. In Kaye, and Daniels, (eds), pp. 973–997.Google Scholar

Authier, Gilles, 2012. Grammaire juhuri, ou judeo-tat, langue iranienne des Juifs du Caucase de l’est. Beiträge zur Iranistik, vol. 36. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Babel, Molly E., 2009. Phonetic and Social Selectivity in Speech Accommodation. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Balanovsky, Oleg, et al. and The Genographic Consortium, 2011. Parallel evolution of genes and languages in the Caucasus region. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28 (10): 2905–2920.Google Scholar

Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan Ignacy Niecisław, 1963. Izbrannyye trudy po obshchemu yazykoznaniyu [Selected Works on General Linguistics], vol. 2. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

van den Berg, Helma, 1995. A Grammar of Hunzib. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

van den Berg, Helma, 2005. The East Caucasian language family. Lingua 115 (1): 147–190.Google Scholar

Berta, Árpád, 1998. West Kipchak languages. In Johanson, and Csató, (eds), pp. 301–317.Google Scholar

Bickel, Baltasar, 2008. A general method for the statistical evaluation of typological distributions. Manuscript, University of Leipzig. www.uni-leipzig.de/~bickel/research/projects/publ.htmlGoogle Scholar

Bisang, Walter, 2004. Dialectology and typology: An integrative perspective. In Kortmann, Bernd (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 11–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bläsing, Uwe, 2003. Kalmuck. In Janhunen, Juha (ed.), The Mongolic Languages, pp. 229–247. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette, 2006. A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32 (2): 117–166.Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette and Wedel, Andrew, 2009. Inhibited sound change: An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica 26 (2): 143–183.Google Scholar

Boeder, Winfried, 2005. The South Caucasian languages. Lingua 115 (1): 5–89.Google Scholar

Brown, Cecil, Holman, Eric and Wichmann, Søren, 2013. Sound correspondences in the world’s languages. Language 89 (1): 4–29.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, 2003. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14 (3): 261–290.Google Scholar

Catford, John C., 1977. Mountain of tongues: The languages of the Caucasus. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6: 283–314.Google Scholar

Catford, John C., 1983. Pharyngeal and laryngeal sounds in Caucasian languages. In Bless, Diane and Abbs, James (eds), Vocal Fold Physiology: Contemporary Research and Clinical Issues, pp. 344–350. San Diego: College-Hill.Google Scholar

Catford, John C., 1992. Caucasian phonetics and general phonetics. In Paris, Catherine (ed.), Caucasologie et mythologie comparée: Actes du Colloque International CNRS IVe Colloque de Caucasologie, pp. 193–216, Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Catford, John C., 1994. Vowel systems of Caucasian languages. In Aronson, Howard Isaac (ed.), Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR: Papers from the Fourth Conference, pp. 44–60. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar

C’ereteli, Grigol, 1976. K voprosu o klassifikacii novoaramejskix dialektov [On the question of classification of Neo-Aramaic dialects]. In Philologia Orientalis, vol. IV, Tbilisi: Mecniereba, pp. 224–232.Google Scholar

Chirikba, Viacheslav, 2008a. The problem of the Caucasian Sprachbund. In Muysken, Pieter (ed.), From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics, pp. 25–93. Studies in Language Companion Series, vol. 25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Chirikba, Viacheslav, 2008b. Armenians and their dialects in Abkhazia. In Lubotsky, Alexander, Schaeken, Jos and Wiedenhof, Jeroen (eds), Balto-Slavic and Indo-European Linguistics, pp. 51–67. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Chitoran, Ioana, 2002. Georgian harmonic clusters: Phonetic cues to phonological representation. Phonology 15 (2): 121–141.Google Scholar

Cho, Taehong and Ladefoged, Peter, 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27 (2): 207–229.Google Scholar

Coene, Frederik, 2009. The Caucasus: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Colarusso, John, 1988. The Northwest Caucasian Languages: A Phonological Survey. New York and London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard (ed.), 1981. The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, 2003. A note on pharyngealization and umlaut in two Tsezic languages. In Boeder, Winfried (ed.), Kaukasische Sprachprobleme: Beiträge zu den Kaukasistentagungen in Oldenburg 1995–2001, pp. 105–109. Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, 2008. Linguistic diversity in the Caucasus. Annual Review of Anthropology 37 (1): 131–143.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard and Khalilov, Madzhid, 2010. The Dictionary of Languages and Dialects of the Peoples of the Northern Caucasus: Comparison of the Basic Lexicon; Languages and Dialects of the Peoples of Republic of Daghestan, Ingush Republic, Republic of North Ossetia-Alania, Chechen Republic and of the Nakh-Daghestanian Peoples of Azerbaijan and Georgia. Makhachkala, and Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar

Daniel, Mikhail, Dobrushina, Nina and Knyazev, Sergey, 2011. Highlanders’ Russian: Case study in bilingualism and language interference in central Daghestan. In Mustajoki, Arto, Protassova, Ekaterina and Vakhtin, Nikolai (eds), Instrumentarium of Linguistics: Sociolinguistic Approach to Non-Standard Russian, pp. 65–93. Slavica Helsingiensia, vol. 40. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Dirr, Adolf, 1928. Einführung in das Studium der kaukasischen Sprachen: mit einer Sprachenkarte. Leipzig: Asia Major.Google Scholar

Dobrushina, Nina, 2013. How to study multilingualism of the past: Investigating traditional contact situations in Daghestan. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (3): 376–393.Google Scholar

Dzhidalaev, Nurislam S., 2010. Tjurksko-dagestanskie jazykovye kontakty (na primere lakskogo jazyka) [Turkic-Dagestanian language contacts (on the example of Lak)]. Makhachkala: Russian Academy of Science in Dagestan.Google Scholar

Fallon, Paul D., 2001. The Synchronic and Diachronic Phonology of Ejectives. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Flege, James E., Schirru, Carlo and MacKay, Ian R. A., 2003. Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40: 467–491.Google Scholar

Flege, James E. and Port, Robert, 1981. Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24: 125–146.Google Scholar

Forker, Diana, 2013. A Grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2009. Sociolinguistics in the Caucasus. In Ball, Martin J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics Around the World, pp. 127–138. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gilles, Peter and Siebenhaar, Beat, 2010. Areal variation in segmental phonetics and phonology. In Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds), Language and Space, pp. 760–786. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Gippert, Jost, 2008. Endangered Caucasian languages in Georgia: Linguistic parameters of language endangerment. In Harrison, K. David, Rood, David S. and Dwyer, Arienne (eds), Lessons from Documented Endangered Languages, pp. 159–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew and Applebaum, Ayla, 2006. Turkish Kabardian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36 (2): 255–264.Google Scholar

Grawunder, Sven, 2013. Intensity slopes as robust measure for distinguishing glottalic vs pulmonic stop initiation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (5): 4069.Google Scholar

Grawunder, Sven, 2015. Foneticheskie kharakteristiki (nenazalizovannykh) glaznykh v bezhtinskom yazyke [Phonetic characteristics of (non-nasalized) vowels in Bezhta]. In Comrie, Bernard (ed.), Grammatika bezhtinskogo yazyka [A Grammar of Bezhta], pp. 52–62. Leipzig and Makhachkala: ALEPH.Google Scholar

Grawunder, Sven, Simpson, Adrian P. and Khalilov, Madzhid S., 2010. Phonetic characteristics of ejectives: Samples from Caucasian languages. In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine and Żygis, Marzena (eds), Turbulent Sounds: An Interdisciplinary Guide, pp. 209–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gudava, Togo E., 1964. Konsonantizm andijxskix yazykov [The Consonantism of the Andic Languages]. Tbilisi: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoj SSR.Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C., 1991. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. I: The Kartvelian Languages. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42 (1): 25–70.Google Scholar

Hewitt, B. George, 1981. Caucasian languages. In Comrie, (ed.), pp. 196–237.Google Scholar

Hewitt, B. George, 1989. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 2: The North West Caucasian Languages. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar

Hewitt, B. George, 2004. Introduction to the Study of the Languages of the Caucasus. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar

Hewitt, B. George, 2005. North West Caucasian. Lingua 115 (1): 91–145.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012a Areal features of the Anglophone world. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 1–19. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012b. Internally and externally motivated language change. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, pp. 387–407. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar

Höhlig, Monika, 1997. Kontaktbedingter Sprachwandel in der adygeischen Umgangssprache im Kaukasus und in der Türkei: Vergleichende Analyse des russischen und türkischen Einflusses in mündlichen adygeischen Texten. LINCOM Studies in Caucasian Linguistics, vol. 3. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Holisky, Dee Ann, 1991. Laz. In Harris, (ed.), pp. 395–472.Google Scholar

Holisky, Dee Ann and Gagua, Rasudan, 1994. Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In Smeets, (ed.), pp. 147–212.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M., 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31 (2): 213–238.Google Scholar

Isakov, Isak Abdulvakhidovich and Khalilov, Madzhid S., 2004. Hinukh. In Job, (ed.), pp. 167–214.Google Scholar

Isakov, Isak Abdulvakhidovich and Khalilov, Madzhid S., 2012. Gunzibskij jazyk (Fonetika Morfologija. Slovoobrazovanie. Leksika. Teksty) [The Hunzib Language]. Makhachkala: Russian Academy of the Sciences.Google Scholar

Jastrow, Otto, 1977. Zur Phonologie des Kurdischen in der Türkei. Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, 3: 84–106.Google Scholar

Job, Michael (ed.), 2004. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, vol. 3: The North East Caucasian Languages, part 1. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars, 2006. On the roles of Turkic in the Caucasus area. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas, pp. 160–181. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars and Csató, Éva (eds), 1998. The Turkic Languages. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kaye, Alan S. and Daniels, Peter T. (eds), 1997. Phonologies of Asia and Africa (including the Caucasus), vol. 1. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

Keskin, Mesut, 2008. Zur dialektalen Gliederung des Zazaki. Unpublished MA thesis, Johann-Wolfgang-von-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Institut für Vergleichende indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

Khalidova, Rasidat Sachrudinovna, 2006. Avarsko-andijskie jazykovye kontakty [Avar-Andic Language Contacts]. Makhachkala: Russian Academy of the Sciences.Google Scholar

Khalilov, Madzhid Sharipovic, 2004. Gruzinsko-dagestanskie jazykovye kontakty [Georgian–Dagestanian Language Contacts]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar

Khalilova, Zaira, 2009. A Grammar of Kwarshi. PhD thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey, 2008. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Barwar. Handbook of Oriental Studies, Section 1: The Near and Middle East, vol. 96. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kibrik, Alexander E., 2001. Bagvalinskij jazyk: Grammatika, teksty, slovari [The Bagvalal Language: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary]. Moscow: Russian Academy of the Sciences.Google Scholar

Kibrik, Alexander E. and Kodzasov, Sandro V., 1990. Sopostavitel’noe izucenie dagestanskix jazykov: Imja, Fonetika [A Comparative Study of Dagestanian Languages: Nouns, Phonetics]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universitet.Google Scholar