Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:15:04.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - Darwin and Darwinism in France after 1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Summary

The incorporation of Darwinism – its theory of modification of species through natural selection – occurred in research programs in France in the 1930s with the development of a remarkable and unique school of genetics of experimental populations. Around the same time, however, France witnessed another remarkable episode, perhaps the most impressive example of a durable and late opposition of French science to evolutionary theory: the general aversion of French paleontologists to phylogenies in the years 1900–50. (For a detailed account of these episodes, see Gayon and Veuille 2001; Gayon 2006, 2009.) As will be seen, images play an important role in this story.

The French Paleontologists’ Aversion to Representing Phylogenies (1900–1950)

This is a rather strange story, well known to paleontologists, but that has escaped the attention of historians of science. A quantitative enquiry into the three French periodicals that published almost the entire production of French paleontology in the years from 1900 to 1950 gave the following results.

Case 1: Annales de paléontologie (1906–1950)

Let us first consider the Annales de paléontologie (Annals of Paleontology). Founded in 1906, this was the very first periodical devoted entirely to paleontology in France. In the first issue of the journal, the editor Marcellin Boulle (known for his work in human paleontology) stated that “philosophical paleontology” should be a priority for the authors. “Philosophical paleontology” was a term Albert Gaudry used as a synonym for “evolutionary paleontology.” “Philosophical” meant that paleontologists should not only describe the presence of fossils in stratigraphic layers but should dare to make phylogenetic inferences.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×