Berwick, Robert and Weinberg, Amy. 1984. The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan W. 1970. “On Complementizers: Towards a Syntactic Theory of Complement Types.” Foundations of Language 6:297–321.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan W. 1971. “Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations.” Language 47:257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Ms. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and MIT, Cambridge MA. [Revised 1956 version published in part by Plenum, New York, 1975; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985.]Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1964a. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1964b. “The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory.” In Lunt, Horace, ed. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 914–978. Reprinted as “Current Issues in Linguistic Theory.” In Fodor and Katz, eds. Structure of Language. New York: Prentice-Hall. 1964.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In Jacobs, Roderick A. and Rosenbaum, Peter S., eds. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham MA: Ginn and Co. 184–221. [Reprinted in Noam Chomsky, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 1972, 11–61.]Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1973. “Conditions on Transformations.” In Anderson, Stephen and Kiparsky, Paul, eds. A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 232–286.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. “On wh-Movement.” In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas, and Akmajian, Adrian, eds. Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press. 71–132.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J., eds. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52. [Reprinted in Noam Chomsky, The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1995), 167–217.]Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, eds. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Kenstowicz, Michael, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT. 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” In Belletti, Adriana, ed. Structures and Beyond – The Cartography of Syntactic Structure Vol. 3. Oxford University Press. 104–131.Google Scholar

Epstein, Samuel D. 1999. “Un-Principled Syntax: The Derivation of Syntactic Relations.” In Epstein, Samuel D. and Hornstein, Norbert, eds. Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1969. Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 2005. “Grammar, Levels, and Biology.” In McGilvray, James, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard and Saito, Mamoru. 1992. “Move-α”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, Mitchell. 1980. A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McCloskey, James. 1991. “Resumptive Pronouns, A’-Binding, and Levels of Representation in Irish.” In Hendrick, Randall, ed. Syntax and Semantics 23: The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages. New York: Academic Press. 199–248.Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1980. “Violations of the wh-Island Constraint and the Subjacency Condition.” Journal of Italian Linguistics 5:157–195.Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Published as Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex (1986).Google Scholar

Torrego, Esther. 1984. “On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects.” Linguistic Inquiry 15:103–129.Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. “Multiple Spell-Out.” In Epstein, Samuel David and Hornstein, Norbert, eds. Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 251–282Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005a. In Name Only: Structuring Sense. Vol. I. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005b. The Normal Course of Events: Structuring Sense. Vol. II. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking Form: Structuring Sense. Vol. III. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Sean. 2005, Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. Language and Thought. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, Robert, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, eds. Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89–155.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2004. “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” In Belletti, A., ed. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. III. Oxford University Press. 104–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2005. “Three Factors in Language Design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2007. “Approaching UG from Below.” In Sauerland, Uli and Gärtner, Hans-Martin, eds. Interfaces + Recursion = Language? New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–29.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. “On Phases.” In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos, and Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa, eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. “Problems of Projection.” Lingua 130:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015a. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax: 50th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015b. The Minimalist Program: 20th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015c. “Problems of Projection: Extensions.” In Di Domenico, Elisa, Hamann, Cornelia and Matteini, Simona, eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–16.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam and McGilvray, James. 2012. The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, Albert. 1951. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Bonanza Books.Google Scholar

Epstein, Samuel and Hornstein, Norbert. 2005. “The Future of Language (Science).” Language 81:3–5.Google Scholar

Epstein, Samuel and Seely, T. Daniel, eds. 2002. Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Samuel and Seely, T. Daniel, eds. 2006. Derivations in Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Samuel and Seely, T. Daniel, eds. 2007. “The Anatomy of Chomsky’s Biolinguistic Minimalism: A Tutorial.” Video. Biolinguistics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freidin, Robert and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 2001. “Exquisite Connections: Some Remarks on the Evolution of Linguistic Theory.” Lingua 111:639–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hauser, Marc, Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?” Science 298:1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffman, Donald. 1998. Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Jacob, François. 1982. The Possible and the Actual. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1994. Target α: A Unified Theory of Movement and Structure-Building. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard and Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Move Alpha: Conditions on Its Application and Output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, Richard. 1990. “The Evolution of Cognition: Questions We Will Never Answer.” In Osherson, Daniel and Smith, Edward, eds. Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. III. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 107–132.Google Scholar

Luria, Salvador. 1974. Transcript of remarks at “A Debate on Bio-Linguistics,” a conference organized by the Centre Royaumont pour une science de l’homme, Paris, held at Endicott House, Dedham, MA, 20–21 May 1974.Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. “No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): Article 14.Google Scholar

McGilvray, James. 2014. Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Nash, L. K. 1963. The Nature of the Natural Sciences, Boston: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, E. 1991. Core Questions in Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stewart, Ian. 1998. Life’s Other Secret. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Weinberg, Steven. 1977. “The Forces of Nature.” American Scientist 65:171–176.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. D. 1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. D. and Brown, S.. 1997. “Interarboreal Operations: Head Movement and the Extension Requirement.” Linguistic Inquiry 28(2):345–356.Google Scholar

Boskovic, Z. and Nunes, J.. 2007. “The Copy Theory of Movement: A view from PF.” In Corver, N. and Nunes, J., eds. The Copy Theory of Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. and McGilvray, J.. 2012. The Science of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. 1966. “How to Learn to Talk.” In Smith, F. and Miller, G. A., eds. The Genesis of Langauge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fox, D. 2000. Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. 2009. A Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K.. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lechner, W. 2004. Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. 1998. “The Evolution of Cognition: Questions We Will Never Answer.” In Scarborough, D. and Sternberg, S., eds. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Volume 4: Methods, Models and Conceptual Issues. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Matushansky, O. 2006. “Head Movement in Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 69–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunes, J. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sidewards Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uriagereka, J. 1998. Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Aitchison, Jean. 1998. Seeds of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Amunts, Katrin and Ziles, Karl. 2012. “Architecture and Organizational Principles of Broca’s Region.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(8):418–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bates, Timothy C., Luciano, Michelle, Medland, Sarah, Montgomery, Grant W., Wright, Margaret, and Nicholas, Martin G.. 2011. “Genetic Variance in a Component of the Language Acquisition Device: ROBO1 Polymorphisms Associated with Phonological Buffer Deficits. Behavior Genetics, 41:50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berwick, Robert C. 1982. Locality Principles and the Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar

Berwick, Robert C. 1985. The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berwick, Robert C., Beckers, Gabriel, Okanoya, Kazuo, and Bolhuis, Johan. 2011. “Songs to Syntax.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3):112–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berwick, Robert C. and Chomsky, Noam. 2016. Why Only Us. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blevins, Judith. 2006. “A Theoretical Synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology.” Theoretical Linguistics, 32(2):117–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Schlesewsky, Matthias, Small, Steven L., and Rauschecke, Josef P.. 2015. “Neurobiological Roots of Language in Primate Audition: Common Computational Properties.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19:142–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Prager Publishers.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. “Notes on Denotation and Denoting.” In Caponigro, I. and Cecchetto, C., eds. From Grammar to Meaning: The Spontaneous Logicality of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2016. “The Language Capacity: Architecture and Evolution.” In Fitch, William Tecumseh, ed. Psychological Bulletin and Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1078-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dediu, Daniel. 2011. “Are Languages Really Independent from Genes? If Not, What Would a Genetic Bias Affecting Language Diversity Look Like?” Human Biology 83(2):279–296.Google Scholar

Dediu, Daniel and Levinson, Steven. 2013. “On the Antiquity of Language: The Reinterpretation of Neandertal Linguistic Capacity and Its Consequences.” Frontiers in Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enard, Wolfgang, Przeworski, Molly, Fisher, Simon E., Lai, Cecilia, Wiebe, Victor, Kitano, Takashi, Monaco, Anthony P., and Paääbo, Svante. 2002. “Molecular Evolution of FOXP2, a Gene Involved in Speech and Language.” Nature 418:869–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Everaert, Martin, Huijbregts, Riny, Chomsky, Noam, Berwick, Robert C., and Bolhuis, Johan J.. 2015. “Structure Not Strings: Linguistics as Part of the Cognitive Sciences.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(12):729–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fisher, Simon E. 2016. “A Molecular Genetic Perspective on Speech and Language.” In Hickock, Gregory and Small, Steven, eds. Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, Simon E. and Ridley, Matthew. 2013. “Evolution, Culture, Genes, and the Human Revolution.” Science 340(6135):929–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fisher, Simon E. and Vernes, Sonja. 2015. “Genetics and the Language Sciences.” Annual Review of Linguistics 1:289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitch, William Tecumseh. 2013. “Noam Chomsky and the Biology of Language.” In Harmand, Oren and Dietrich, Michel R., eds. Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 201–222.Google Scholar

Fitch, William Tecumseh. 2014. “Toward a Computational Framework for Cognitive Biology: Unifying Approaches from Cognitive Neuroscience and Comparative Cognition.” Physics of Life Reviews 11(3):329–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friederici, Angela D. 2004. “Processing Local Transitions Versus Long-distance Syntactic Hierarchies.” Trends in Cognitive Science 8:245–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friederici, Angela D., Moro, Andrea, Chomsky, Noam, Berwick, Robert C., and Bolhuis, Johan. 2016. “Language in the Brain.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, in press.Google Scholar

Graham, Sarah and Fisher, Simon E.. 2015. “Understanding Language from a Genomic Perspective.” Annual Reviews of Genetics 49:131–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Graham, Sarah, Deriziotis, Pelagia, and Fisher, Simon E.. 2015. “Insights into the Genetic Foundations of Human Communication.” Neuropsychological Review 25:3–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gronau, Ilan, Hubisz, Melissa J., Gulko, Brad, Danko, Charles G., and Siepel, Adam. 2011. “Bayesian Inference of Ancient Human Demography from Individual Genome Sequences.” Nature Genetics 43:1031–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hauser, Marc. 2009. “The Mind.” Scientific American September, 44–51.Google Scholar

Hoogman, Martine, Guadalupe, Tulio, Zwiers, Marcel P., Klarenbeek, Patricia, Francks, Clyde, and Fisher, Simon E.. 2014. “Assessing the Effects of Common Variation in the FOXP2 Gene on Human Brain Structure.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:1. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huijbregts, Riny. 2016. “Clicks and Evolution.” Unpublished ms. Utrecht University.Google Scholar

Idsardi, William James. 2015. “What’s Different About Phonology? No Recursion.” Ms. University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Jerison, Harry J. 1973. Evolution of the Brain and Human Intelligence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon. 2000. “Syntax Without Natural Selection: How Compositionality Emerges from Vocabulary in a Population of Learners.” In Knight, Christopher, ed. The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, Johannes, Lalueza-Fox, Carles, Orlando, Ludovic, Enard, Wolfgang, Green, Richard, Burbano, Herman A., Hublin, Jean-Jacques, Hänni, Catherine, Fortea, Javier, de la Rasilla, Marco, Bertranpetit, Jean, Rosas, Jonas, and Pääbo, Svante. 2007. “The Derived FOXP2 Variant of Modern Humans Was Shared with Neandertals.” Current Biology 17:1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhlwilm, Martin, Gronau, Ilan, Hubisz, Melissa J., de Filippo, Cesare, Prado-Martinez, Javier Kircher, Martin, Fu, Qiaomei, Burbano, Hernán A., Lalueza-Fox, Carles, de la Rasilla, Marco, Rosas, Antonio, Rudan, Pavao, Brajkovic, Dejana, Kucan, Željko, Gušic, Ivan, Marques-Bonet, Tomas, Andrés, Aida M., Viola, Bence, Pääbo, Svante, Meyer, Matthias, Siepel, Adam, and Castellano, Sergi. 2016. “Ancient Gene Flow from Early Modern Humans into Eastern Neanderthals.” Nature 530:429–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lenneberg, Eric. 1964. New Directions in the Study of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Matthias, Arsuaga, Juan-Luis, de Filippo, Cesare, Nagel, Sarah, Aximu-Petri, Ayinuer, Nickel, Birgit, Martínez, Ignacio, Gracia, Ana, de Castro, José María Bermúdez, Carbonell, Eudald, Viola, Bence, Kelso, Janet, Prüfer, Kay, and Pääbo, Svante. 2016. “Nuclear DNA Sequences from the Middle Pleistocene Sima de los Huesos Hominins.” Nature 531:504–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Niyogi, Partha, and Berwick, Robert C.. 1995. “The Logical Problem of Language Change.” AI Memo 1516, MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niyogi, Partha, and Berwick, Robert C.. 2009. “The Proper Treatment of Language Change in a Population Setting.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:10124–10129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niyogi, Partha. 2006. The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pagel, Mark, Atkinson, Quentin D., and Meade, Andrew. 2007. “Frequency of Word-Use Predicts Rates of Lexical Evolution Throughout Indo-European History.” Nature 449:717–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Petitto, Laura Anne. 2005. “How the Brain Begets Language.” In McGilvray, J., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–101.Google Scholar

Pfenning, Andreas R., Hara, Erina, Whitney, Osceola, Rivas, Miriam V., Wang, Rui, Roulhac, Petra L., Howard, Jason T., Wirthlin, Morgan, Lovell, Peter V., Ganapathy, Ganeshkumar, Mountcastle, Jacquelyn, Moseley, M. Arthur, Will Thompson, J., Soderblom, Erik J., Iriki, Atsushi, Kato, Masaki, Thomas, M., Gilbert, P., Zhang, Guojie, Bakken, Trygve, Bongaarts, Angie, Bernard, Amy, Lein, Ed, Mello, Claudio V., Hartemink, Alexander J., and Jarvis, Erich D.. 2014. Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds. Science 346 (6215):1256846 (1–13).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pinker, Steven and Bloom, Paul. 1989. “Natural Language and Natural Selection.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4):707–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rilling, James K. 2014. “Comparative Primate Neurobiology and the Evolution of Brain Language Systems.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28:C:10–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saffran, Jenny, Aslin, William, and Newport, Elissa. 1996. “Statistical Learning by 8-month Old Infants.” Science 274:1926–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Somel, Mehmet, Liu, Xiling, and Khaitovich, Philipp. 2013. “Human Brain Evolution: Transcripts, Metabolites and Their Regulators.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 14:112–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sonderreger, Morgan and Niyogi, Partha. 2010. “Combining Data and Mathematical Models of Language Change.” Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1019–1029.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Niko. 1951. The Study of Instinct. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Whitehouse, Andrew, Bishop, Dorothy. V. M., Ang, Qi W., Pennell, Craig E., and Fisher, Simon E.. 2011. “CNTNAP2 Variants Affect Early Language Development in the General Population.” Genes, Brain and Behavior 10:451–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yang, Charles D. 2000. “Internal and External Forces in Language Change.” Language Variation and Change 12:231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, Charles D. 2004. “Universal Grammar, Statistics, or Both?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(10):451–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yang, Charles D. 2013. “Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Language.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(16):6324–6327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zaccarella, E. and Friederici, Angela D.. 2015. “Reflections of Word Processing in the Insular Cortex: A Sub-Regional Parcellation Based Functional Assessment.” Brain and Language 142:1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alexiadou, Artemis, Borer, Hagit, and Schäfer, Florian, eds. 2015. The Roots of Syntax, the Syntax of Roots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1985. “The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry 16:373–416.Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking Form, Structuring Sense. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S., eds. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn. 184–221.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J., eds. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Kenstowitz, M., ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. “Problems of Projection.” Lingua 130:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2015. “Problems of Projection: Extensions.” In Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C., and Matteini, S., eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond, Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Clark, Eve and Clark, Herbert. 1979. “When Nouns Surface as Verbs.” Language 55:767–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1967. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” In Rescher, N., ed. The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiSciullo, Anna Maria and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Doron, Edit. ed. 2014. Theoretical Linguistics: On the Identity of Roots 40:3–4.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, and O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64:501–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1994. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. “Complement Selection and the Lexicon.” Linguistic Inquiry 10:279–326.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, S. Jay. 1993. “On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations.” In Hale, Kenneth and Jay Keyser, S., eds. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 53–110.Google Scholar

Halle, Morris. 1973. “Prolegomena to a Theory of Word Formation.” Linguistic Inquiry 4:3–16.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. “Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon.” Language 51:639–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. “Severing the External Argument from the Verb.” In Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie, eds. Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapointe, Steven. 1980. A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 2011. “The Lexicon Project and Its Legacy.” PowerPoint presentation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick. 1980. Linguistic Theory in America. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Roeper, Thomas and van Hout., Angeliek 2009. “The Representation of Movement in –ability Nominalizations: Evidence for Covert Category Movement, Edge Phenomena, and Local LF.” In Giannakidou, A. and Rathert, M., eds. Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 344–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasow, Tom. 1977. “Transformations and the Lexicon.” In Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A., eds. Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1981. “Argument Structure and Morphology.” The Linguistic Review 1:81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alfinito, E., Viglione, R. G., and Vitiello, G. 2001. “The Decoherence Criterion.” Modern Physics Letters B 15:127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beige, A., Knight, P. L., and Vitiello, G.. 2005. “Cooling Many Particles at Once.” New Journal of Physics. 7(9):96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blasone, M., Jizba, P., and Vitiello, G.. 2011. Quantum Field Theory and Its Macroscopic Manifestations. London: Imperial College Press/World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J.. 2007. “Overt Copies in Reflexive and Control Structures: A Movement Analysis.” In Conroy, A., Jing, C., Nakao, C., and Takahashi, E., eds. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 15:1–46.Google Scholar

Boolos, G. 1993. The Logic of Provability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chierchia, G. 2006. “Formal Semantics.” In Brown, E. K., Asher, R. E., and Simpson, J. M. Y., eds. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 564–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chierchia, G., and McConnell-Ginet, S.. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding (The Pisa Lectures). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2013a. “Problems of Projection.” Lingua 130:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2013b. “Notes on Denotation and Denoting.” In Caponigro, I. and Cecchetto, C., eds. From Grammar to Meaning: The Spontaneous Logicality of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2013c. “What Is Language” (First lecture of Dewey Lectures 2013: “What Kind of Creatures Are We?” The Journal of Philosophy 110(12): 645–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2015. “Problems of Projection: Extensions.” In Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C. and Matteini, S., eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2017. “Puzzles about Phases.” In Franco, L. and Bellucci, G., eds., Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation – A Festschrift in Honour of M. Rita Manzini. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., and McGilvray, J., 2012. The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Close, F. 2011. The Infinity Puzzle: Quantum Field Theory and the Hunt for an Orderly Universe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Di Sciullo, A. M. 2005. Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Sciullo, A. M., and Williams, E., 1978. Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, S., Kitahara, H., and Seely, D.. 2012. “Structure Building That Can’t Be.” In Uribe-Etxebarria, M. and Valmala, V., eds. Ways of Structure Building. Oxford University Press. 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feynman, R. P. and Hibbs, A. R.. 1965. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M.. 1963. The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. D. 1980. Semantics: Theories of Meaning in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z.. 2015. Minds without Meanings: An Essay on the Content of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, W. J., and Vitiello, G.. 2006. “Nonlinear Brain Dynamics as Macroscopic Manifestation of Underlying Many-Body Dynamics.” Physics of Life Reviews 3:93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, W. J., and Vitiello, G.. 2008. “Brain Dynamics, Dissipation, and Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41 (30): 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilmore, R. 1994. Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications. Malabar FL: Krieger.Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heim, I. and Kratzer, A.. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Higginbotham, J. T. 1985. “On Semantics.” Linguistic Inquiry 16(4):547–593.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K. K.. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Idsardi, W. J., and Uriagereka, J.. 2009. “Metrical Combinatorics and the Real Half of the Fibonacci Sequence.” Biolinguistics 3(4):404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayne, R. S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McGilvray, J. 1998. “Meanings Are Syntactically Individuated and Found in the Head.” Mind and Language 13:225–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGilvray, J. 1999/2014. Chomsky: Language, Mind and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Second extensively revised edition (2014).Google Scholar

Medeiros, D. P. 2008. “Optimal Growth in Phrase Structure.” Biolinguistics 2(3):152–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medeiros, D. P. 2012. Economy of Command. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Medeiros, D. P., and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. 2016. “The Golden Phrase: Steps to the Physics of Language.” In Gallego, A. and Martin, R., eds. Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moro, A. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Moro, A. 2013. “Rethinking Symmetry: A Note on Labeling and the EPP.” The Equilibrium of Human Syntax. Symmetries in the Brain. New York: Routledge. 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piattelli-Palmarini, M., and Uriagereka, J.. 2008. “Still a Bridge Too Far? Biolinguistic Questions for Grounding Language on Brains.” Physics of Life Reviews 5(4):207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piattelli-Palmarini, M., and Vitiello, G.. 2015. “Linguistics and Some Aspects of its Underlying Dynamics.” Biolinguistics 9: 96–115. See also arXiv:1506.08663 at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08663CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pietroski, P. M. 2005. “Meaning Before Truth.” In Preyer, G. and Peters, G., eds. Contextualism in Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 225–300.Google Scholar

Prigogine, I. 1955. Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Prigogine, I., and Glandsorff, P.. 1971. Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, J. 2006. “Lexical Semantics: Overview.” In Keith, B., ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier. 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shah, M. N., Umezawa, H., and Vitiello, G.. 1974. “Relation Among Spin Operators and Magnons.” Physical Review B 10:4724–4736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umezawa, H. 1993. Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro and Thermal Concepts. New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar

Vitiello, G. 1974. “Dynamical Rearrangement of Symmetry,” Dissertation Abstract International 36–02, Section B:0769.Google Scholar

Vitiello, G. 2001. My Double Unveiled. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Fintel, K., and Matthewson, L.. 2008. “Universals in Semantics.” The Linguistic Review 25:139–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wybourne, B. G. 1974. Classical Groups for Physicists. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Zee, A. 2010. Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (2nd ed.). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar