Ackerman, Bruce, We the People: Foundations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Adelstein, Richard, Firms as Persons (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author).Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Rivers, Julian trans., New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Allan, Trevor R.S., The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip, ed., Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Alston, Philip & Goodman, Ryan, International Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (The Hague, Hague Academy of International Law, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Applebaum, Arthur, Ethics for Adversaries (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar

Arndt, Christiane & Oman, Charles, Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators (Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2006).Google Scholar

Baxi, Upendra, The Future of Human Rights, 2nd ed. (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Pascalian Meditations (Nice, Richard trans., Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Brewer-Carías, Allan R., Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, Peter, Administrative Law, 4th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon, 2004).Google Scholar

Cass, Deborah, The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colon-Rios, Joel, Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power (London & New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conaglen, Matthew, Fiduciary Loyalty: Protecting the Due Performance of Non-Fiduciary Duties (Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar

Cooter, Robert D., The Strategic Constitution (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Davies, Anne C.L., The Public Law of Government Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Mansfield, Harvey & Winthrop, Delba, trans. and ed., Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dicey, Albert, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1959).Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf & Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, Catherine M., Delegation of Governmental Power to Private Parties: A Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar

Fabre, Cecile, Social Rights under the Constitution: Government and the Decent Life (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press & New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fredman, Sandra, Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford, UK & New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Daniel & Barak-Erez, Daphne eds., Human Rights in Private Law (Portland, Oregon: Hard Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar

Fox-Decent, Evan, Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: Free Press & Toronto: Collier Macmillan & New York: Maxwell Macmillan, 1991).Google Scholar

Griffin, James, On Human Rights (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilhot, Nicolas, The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and International Order (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, David, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegel, Georg W.F., The Philosophy of Right (Sir Knox, Thomas Malcolm trans., Lanham: Oxford University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Hellman, Deborah & Moreau, Sophia, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Tuck, Richard ed., Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Hogg, Peter W., Constitutional Law of Canada vol. II, 5th ed. (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2007).Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki C. & Tushnet, Mark, Comparative Constitutional Law, 3rd ed. (St Paul, Minn: Foundation Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary, Constitutional Identity (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (Aalen: Scientia, 1984) (Ger.).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought (Washington, DC: Beard Books, 2006, originally published 1975).Google Scholar

Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine (New Delhi & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government (1690), (Macpherson, Crawford Brough ed., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1980).Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Law as a Social System (Kastner, Fatima, Nobles, Richard, Schiff, David & Ziegert, Rosamund eds., Ziegert, Klaus A. trans., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Social Systems (Bednarz, John Jr & Baecker, Dirk trans., Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Mann, Howard, International Investments, Business, and Human Rights: Key Issues and Opportunities (2008), available at www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/iia_business_human_rights.pdf.Google Scholar

Markovits, Daniel, A Modern Legal Ethics: Adversary Advocacy in a Democratic Age (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

McCarthy, Cormac, No Country for Old Men (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005).Google Scholar

McCarthy, Cormac, The Blood Meridian (London: Picador, 1990).Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Neier, Aryeh, Taking Liberties: Four Decades in the Struggle for Rights (New York: Public Affairs, 2003).Google Scholar

Newcombe, Andrew & Paradell, Luís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar

Nolan, Donal & Robertson, Andrew eds., Rights and Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Oliver, Dawn, Common Values and the Public-Private Divide (London: Buttterworths, 1999).Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, Luke Eric, Human Rights and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Mapping the Role of Human Rights Law within Investor-State Arbitration (2009), available at publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2012/dd-rd/E84-36-2009-eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Power, Michael, The Audit Explosion (London, UK: Demos, 1994).Google Scholar

Poynder, John, Literary Extracts (London: William Edward Painter, 342, Strand, 1844).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Roach, Kent, The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2001).Google Scholar

Rose, Nikolas, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandel, Michael, Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht, Boston: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar

Schapiro, Robert A., Polyphonic Federalism: Toward the Protection of Fundamental Rights (Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schill, Stephan W., ed., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiderman, David, Resisting Economic Globalization: Critical Theory and International Investment Law (Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scolnicov, Anat, Religious Freedom in International Law: Between Group Right and Individual Right (Oxon & New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn, Mixed Signals: US Human Rights Policy and Latin America (Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment, 3rd ed. (Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. & Holmes, Stephen, The Cost of Rights (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1999).Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Jean, Public Rights, Private Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

van der Walt, Johan, The Horizontal Effect Revolution and the Question of Sovereignty (Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verkuil, Paul R., Outsourcing Sovereignty: Why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and What We Can Do about It (Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sir Wade, William, Wade and Forsyth on Administrative Law, 7th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Sir Wade, William, Wade & Forsyth, Administrative Law, 9th ed. (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, The Right to Private Property (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Sociological Writings (New York: Continuum, 1994).Google Scholar

Weinrib, Ernest J., The Idea of Private Law (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

White, G. Edward, The Constitution and the New Deal (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Katherine, Constituting Economic and Social Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zackin, Emily, Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America’s Positive Rights (Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 345 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. in this volume.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., The Evolving BIT, in Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law 1 (Laird, Ian A. & Weiler, Todd eds., Huntington, NY: JurisNet, 2010).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., What are International Judges For? The Main Functions of International Adjudication, in The Oxford Handbook on International Adjudication 158 (Romano, Cesare, Alter, Karen J. & Shany, Yuval eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Aronson, Mark, A Public Lawyer’s Responses to Privatisation and Outsourcing, in The Province of Administrative Law 40 (Taggart, Michael ed., Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar

Bamforth, Nicholas & Leyland, Peter, Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution, in Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution 247 (Bamforth, Nicholas & Leyland, Peter eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart, 2003).Google Scholar

Brooks, Richard R. W., Knowledge in Fiduciary Relations, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 225 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Chester, Burke-White, William & von Staden, Andreas; Asteriti, Alessandra & Tams, Christian J.; and Marboe, Irmgard, all in The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (Schill, Stephan W., ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

della Cananea, Giacinto, Procedural Due Process of Law Beyond the State, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 965 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, Peter, Accountability and the Public/Private Distinction, in Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution 247 (Bamforth, Nicholas & Leyland, Peter eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart, 2003).Google Scholar

Cane, P., Theory and Values in Public Law, in Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow 15 (Craig, Paul & Rawlings, Richard eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Cherednychenko, Olha O., Subordinating Contract Law to Fundamental Rights: Towards a Major Breakthrough or Towards Walking in Circles?, in Constitutional Values and European Contract Law 35 (Grundmann, Stefan ed., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar

Dagan, Hanoch & Hannes, Sharon, Managing Our Money: The Law of Financial Fiduciaries as a Private Law Institution, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 91 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Dennis M., Socio-Economic Rights, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law 1020 (Rosenfeld, Michel & Sajó, András eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Unification Rather than Fragmentation of International Law? The Case of International Investment Law and Human Rights Law, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 45 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dürig, Günter, Grundrechte und Zivilrechtsprechung, in Vom Bonner Grundgesetz zur gesamtdeutschen Verfassung. Festschrift zum 75. Geburtstag von Hans Nawiasky 177–82 (Maunz, Theodor ed., Munich: Isar Verlag, 1956) (Ger.).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Political Judges and the Rule of Law, in A Matter of Principle, ch. I (Cambridge, Mass & London, England: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Ewing, Keith D., Economic Rights, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law 1036 (Rosenfeld, Michel & Sajó, András eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Feinäugle, Clemens A., The UN Security Council Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 101 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, Franco, Forum Shopping in the International Arbitration Context: Setting the Stage, in Franco Ferrari, Forum Shopping in the International Commercial Arbitration Context 1 (Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, Paul, The Forgotten ‘Trust’: The People and the State, in Equity: Issues and Trends 131 (Cope, Malcolm ed., Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Fox-Decent, Evan, Fiduciary Authority and the Service Conception, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 363 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox-Decent, Evan, From Fiduciary States to Joint Trusteeship of the Atmosphere: The Right to a Healthy Environment through a Fiduciary Prism, in Fiduciary Duty and the Atmospheric Trust 253 (Coghill, Ken, Sampford, Charles & Smith, Tim eds., Surrey & Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar

Freedland, Mark, Law, Public Services, and Citizenship—New Domains, New Regimes?, in Public Service and Citizenship in European Law—Public and Labour Law Perspectives E11 (Freedland, Mark & Sciarra, Silvana eds., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Gold, Andrew S., The Loyalties of Fiduciary Law, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 176 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldmann, Matthias, Inside Relative Normativity: From Sources to Standard Instruments for the Exercise of International Public Authority, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 661 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, Freedom of Association, in Freedom of Association 3 (Gutmann, Amy ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, in this volume.Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, State Common Law and the Dual Enforcement of Constitutional Norms, in New Frontiers of State Constitutional Law: Dual Enforcement of Norms 151 (Gardner, James A. and Rossi, Jim eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, Transforming Legal Theory in the Light of Practice: The Judicial Application of Social and Economic Rights to Private Orderings, in Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World 268 (Gauri, Varun & Brinks, Daniel M. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, Moshe, Investment Tribunals and Human Rights Treaties: A Sociological Perspective, in Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives 85 (Baetens, Freya ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, Moshe, Investment Tribunals and Human Rights: Divergent Paths, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 97 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, Moshe, Interactions between Investment and Non-Investment Obligations, in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law 154 (Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico & Schreuer, Christoph eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen & Sunstein, Cass R., The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe, in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment 275 (Levinson, Sanford, ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Howard, Rhoda, Dignity, Community and Human Rights, in Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus 81 (Ahmed An-Na’im, Abdullahi ed., Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Murray., Constitutionalism and Contractualisation of Government in the United Kingdom, in The Province of Administrative Law (Taggart, Michael ed., Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki C. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: A Window into Constitutional Theory and Transnational Constitutionalism, in Democracy perspectives: Festschrift for Brun-Otto Bryde’s 70th Birthday (Bäuerle, Michael, Dann, Philipp & Rabenstein, Astrid Wall eds., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013).Google Scholar

Jenson, Jane & Levi, Ron, Narratives and Regimes of Social and Human Rights: The Jack Pines of the Neoliberal Era, in Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era 69 (Hall, Peter A. & Lamont, Michèle eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kateb, George, The Value of Associations, in Freedom of Association 35 (Gutmann, Amy ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, International Law as Inter-Public Law, in Nomos XLIX: Moral Universalism and Pluralism 167 (Richardson, Henry R. & Williams, Melissa S. eds., New York: New York University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict & Donaldson, Megan, From Bilateralism to Publicness in International Law, in From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma 79 (Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Paulus, Andreas, von Schorlemer, Sabine & Vedder, Christoph eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict & Schill, Stephan, Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality, and the Emerging Global Administrative Law, in El Nuevo Derecho Administrative Global En América Latina: Desafíos Par Alas Inversions Extrajeras, La Regulación Nacional Y El Financiamiento Para El Desarrollo 221 (Buenos Aires: RPA, 2009).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, Beyond the Vienna Convention: Conflicting Treaty Provisions, in The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Cannizazaro, Enzo ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, Grundnormen, Reluctant: Articles 31(3)(C) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Laws of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law, in Time, History and International Law 141 (Craven, Matthew, Fitzmaurice, Malgosia & Vogiatzi, Maria eds., Leiden & Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara & Betz, Timm, The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 371 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Kriebaum, Ursula, Privatizing Human Rights: The Interface between International Investment Protection and Human Rights, in The Law of International Relations—Liber Amicorum Hanspeter Neuhold 165 (Reinsch, August & Kriebaum, Ursula eds., Ultrecht, Netherlands: Eleven International Pub, 2007).Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, Political Liberalism and the Structures of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement, in Law, Rights and Discourse: Themes from the Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy 7 (Pavlakos, George ed., Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

Kurtz, Jürgen, The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO, in The Multilateralization of International Investment Law 243 (Schill, Stephan W., ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Langford, Malcolm, The Justiciability of Social Rights: From Practice to Theory, in Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law 3 (Langford, Malcolm ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locke, John, Second Treatise, in Two Treatises of Government, 265 (Laslett, Peter ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucy, William, Private and Public: Some Banalities about a Platitude, in After Public Law 56 (Mac Amhlaigh, Cormac, Michelon, Claudio & Walker, Neil eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lutz, Donald S., Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment, in Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment 237 (Levinson, Sanford, ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Metzger, Gillian E., Private Delegations, Due Process, and the Duty to Supervise, in Government by Contract: Outsourcing and American Democracy 291 (Freeman, Jody & Minow, Martha eds., Cambridge, Mass. & London, England: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I., The Interplay of Constitutional and Ordinary Jurisdiction, in Comparative Constitutional Law 278 (Ginsburg, Tom & Dixon, Rosalind eds., Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar

Miller, Paul B., The Fiduciary Relationship, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 63 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, Liberal Theories of International Law, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 83 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Morijn, John & Krommendijk, Jasper, “Proportional” by What Measure(s)? Balancing Investor Interests and Human Rights by Way of Applying the Proportionality Principle in Investor-State Arbitration, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 422 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Oliver, Dawn, The Underlying Values of Public and Private Law, in The Province of Administrative Law 217 (Taggart, Michael ed., Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar

Osiatynski, Wictor, Social and Economic Rights in a New Constitution for Poland, in Western Rights? Post-Communist Application 233 (Sajó, András ed., The Hague, The Netherlands & Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International, 1996)Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Multilevel Trade Governance in the WTO Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism, in Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation 5 (Joerges, Christian & Petersmann, Ernst-Ultrich eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, International Proliferation and the International Legal Order, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations 293 (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, Human Rights without Foundations, in The Philosophy of International Law 321 (Besson, Samantha & Tasioulas, John eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries, in Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations 152 (Alexander, Larry ed., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Reiner, Clara & Schreuer, Christoph, Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration, in Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration 82 (Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco & Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich eds., Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Schill, Stephan, International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law—An Introduction, in The Multilateralization of International Investment Law 3 (Schill, Stephan W., ed., Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiderman, David, in this volume.Google Scholar

Scheinin, Martin, Impact on the Law of Treaties, in The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law 23 (Scheinin, Martin & Kamminga, Menno T. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Lionel D., Can We Be Obliged to Be Selfless?, in Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law 141 (Gold, Andrew S. & Miller, Paul B. eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Hillel, Working Rights, in A Debate over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries, Kramer, Mathew H., Simmonds, Nigel E. & Steiner, Hillel eds. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass, Against Positive Rights, in Western Rights? Post-Communist Application 225 (Sajó, András ed., The Hague, The Netherlands & Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International,1996).Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, A Constitutional Moment? The Logics of “Hit the Bottom,” in The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation 3 (Kjaer, Poul & Teubner, Gunther eds., Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, “Global Bukowina”: Legal Pluralism in the World Society, in Global Law without a State (Teubner, Gunther ed., Aldershot, Dartmouth: Ashgate Publishing Company, 1996).Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centered Constitutional Theory?, in Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism 3 (Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne & Teuber, Gunther eds., Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias, Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 4 (von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp & Goldmann, Matthias eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waibel, Michael Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Hwa Liz & Balchin, Claire, The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, in The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality xxxvii (Weibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Hwa Liz & Balchin, Claire eds., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, Property and Ownership, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Zalta, Edward N ed., Standford, CA: Standford University 2012).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, Rights in Conflict, in Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 203 (Cambridge & New York & Victoria: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Weinrib, Lorraine, Constitutional Conceptions and Constitutional Comparativism, in Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law 3 (Jackson, Vicki & Tushnet, Mark eds., Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers, 2002).Google Scholar

Williams, Alexander, Public Authorities, in The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law 48 (Hoffman, David ed., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, John, What Washington Means by Policy Reform, in Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened (Williamson, John ed., Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1990).Google Scholar

Young, Alison L., Mapping Horizontal Effect, in The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law 16 (Hoffman, David ed., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Matthew D., Rights against Rules; The Moral Structure of American Constitutional Law, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 1 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, Equity and General Principles of Law, 25 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 801 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aleinikoff, Thomas Alexander, Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing, 96 Yale L.J. 943 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Larry, The Public/Private Distinction and Constitutional Limits on Private Power, 10 Const. Comment. 361 (1993).Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert, The Construction of Constitutional Rights, 4 Law & Ethics Hum. Rts. 20 (2010).Google Scholar

Allen, Tom, Compensation for Property under the European Convention on Human Rights, 28 Mich. J. Int’l Law 287 (2007).Google Scholar

Allen, Tom, Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property under the European Convention on Human Rights, 59 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 1055 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José E., Are Corporations “Subjects” of International Law?, 9 Santa Clara J. Int’l L. 1 (2011).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., How Not to Link: Institutional Conundrums of an Expanded Trade Regime, 7 Widener L. Symp. J. 1 (2001).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., International Organizations: Accountability or Responsibility, in Responsibility of Individuals, States and Organizations: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Canadian Council on International Law, Ottawa, October 26–28, 2006,121 (Canadian Council on International Law, 2007).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., The Paradoxical Argentina Crisis Cases, 6 World Arb. & Mediation Rev. 143 (2010).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., The Return of the State, 20 Minn. J. Int’l L. 223 (2011).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. & Brink, Tegan, Revisiting the Necessity Defense: Continental Casualty v. Argentina, 2010–11 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 319 (2011).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. & Khamsi, Kathryn, The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime, 2008–09 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 379 (2009).Google Scholar

Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto, The Interpretation of Necessity Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties after the Recent ICSDI Annulment Decisions, 2010–11 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 419 (2011).Google Scholar

Ancelovici, Marcos & Jenson, Jane, La standardisation et les mécanismes du transfert transnational, 1 Rev. Gouv’t Action Pub. 37 (2012) (Fr.).Google Scholar

Atkinson, Rob, Obedience as the Foundation of Fiduciary Duty, 34 J. Corp. L. 45 (2008).Google Scholar

Bandes, Susan A., The Negative Constitution: A Critique, 88 Mich. L. Rev. 8 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, Romina, A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2006 Update, (U.N.D.P/O.D.S. Working Background Paper, 2006).Google Scholar

Barak-Erez, Daphne, The Private Prison Controversy and the Privatisation Continuum, 5 L. & Ethics of Hum. Rts. 138 (2011).Google Scholar

Barak-Erez, Daphne, A State Action Doctrine for an Age of Privatization, 45 Syracuse L. Rev. 1169 (1995).Google Scholar

Barsh, Russel Lawrence, Measuring Human Rights: Problems of Methodology and Purpose, 15 Hum. Rts. Q. 87 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartholomew, Amy & Breakspear, Jennifer, Human Rights as Swords of Empire?, 40 Socialist Reg. 125 (2009).Google Scholar

Baxi, Upendra, Voices of Suffering and the Future of Human Rights (1998) 8 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 125.Google Scholar

Beale, L.K., Charter Schools, Common Schools and the Washington State Constitution, 72 Wash. L. Rev. 535 (1997).Google Scholar

Beermann, Jack M., Administrative-Law-Like Obligations on Private[ized] Entities, 49 UCLA L. Rev. 1717 (2002).Google Scholar

Beermann, Jack M., Privatization and Political Accountability, 28 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1507 (2001).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law, 60 Stanford L. Rev. 595 (2007).Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. Jr., Constitutional Limitations on Corporate Activity—Protection of Personal Rights from Invasion through Economic Power, 100 U. Pa. L. Rev. 933 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bermann, George, Taking Subsidiarity Seriously: Federalism in the European Community and the United States, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 331 (1994).Google Scholar

Bernal, Carlos, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in the Case Study of Colombia: An Analysis of the Justification and Meaning of the Constitutional Replacement Doctrine, 11 I.CON 339 (2013).Google Scholar

BeVier, Lillian & Harrison, John, The State Action Principle and Its Critics, 96 Va. L. Rev. 1767 (2010).Google Scholar

Blank, Yishai, Federalism, Subsidiarity, and the Role of Local Governments in an Age of Global Multilevel Governance, 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 509 (2010).Google Scholar

Branch, H. N. & Rowe, Leo Stanton, The Mexican Constitution of 1917 compared with the Constitution of 1857, 71 Annals Am. Pol. Sci. Ass’n 1, 2 (Supp. May 1917) (translating both constitutions).Google Scholar

Brower, Charles H. II, NAFTA’s Investment Chapter: Initial Thoughts about Second-Generation Rights 36 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 1533 (2003).Google Scholar

Buchanan, G. Sidney, A Conceptual History of the State Action Doctrine: The Search for Governmental Responsibility, 34 Hous. L. Rev. 333 (1997).Google Scholar

Carozza, Paolo G., Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law, 97 Am. J. Int’l L. 38 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin, The Assumptions of Federalism, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 1763 (2006).Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin, Reconceptualizing Federalism, 50 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 729 (2006).Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin, Rethinking State Action, 80 Nw. U. L. Rev. 503 (1985).Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin, Empowering States When It Matters, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 1313 (2004).Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin, The Values of Federalism, 47 Fla. L. Rev. 499 (1995).Google Scholar

Cherednychenko, Olha O., Fundamental Rights and Private Law: A Relationship of Subordination or Complementarity?, 3 Utrecht L. Rev. 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chmielewski, Philip J., Workers’ Participation in the United States: Catholic Social Teaching and Democratic Theory, 55 Rev. Soc. Econ. 487 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe & Porat, Iddo, The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law, 16 San Diego L. Rev. 367 (2009).Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh, Ascription of Legal Responsibility to Groups in Complex Patterns of Economic Integration, 53 Mod. L. Rev. 731 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Paul, Contracting Out, the Human Rights Act and the Scope of Judicial Review, 118 L. Q. Rev. 551 (2002).Google Scholar

Criddle, Evan J., Fiduciary Administration: Rethinking Popular Representation in Agency Rulemaking, 88 Tex. L. Rev. 441 (2010).Google Scholar

Criddle, Evan J., Fiduciary Foundations of Administrative Law, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 117 (2006).Google Scholar

Criddle, Evan J. & Fox-Decent, Evan, Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law, 34 Hum. Rts. Q. 39 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwall, Stephen & Darwall, Julian, Civil Recourse as Mutual Accountability, 39 Fla. St. U. L. R. 17 (2011).Google Scholar

Davies, Anne C.L., This Time It’s for Real: The Health and Social Care Act 2012, 76 Mod. L. Rev. 564 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Anne C.L., Ultra Vires problems in Government Contracts, 122 L.Q. Rev. 98 (2006).Google Scholar

Davis, Kevin, Kingsbury, Benedict & Merry, Sally Engle, Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance (Global Admin. L. Series, Inst. for Int’l L. & Just., Working Paper 2010/2, 2010).Google Scholar

DeMott, Deborah A., Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary Obligation, 1988 Duke L.J 879 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dersnah, Megan, Background Paper, A Review of National MDG Reports from a Gender Perspective, U.N. Women, Expert Grp. Meeting, Oct. 21–24, 2013.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves & Bryant Garth, From the Cold War to Kosovo: The Rise and Renewal of the Field of International Human Rights, 2 Ann. Rev. L. Soc. Sci. 231 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson, Laura A., Public Law Values in a Privatized World, 31 Yale J. Int’l L. 383 (2006).Google Scholar

Donnelly, Catherine, Positive Obligations and Privatisation, 61 N. Ir. Legal Q. 209 (2010).Google Scholar

Donnelly, Catherine M. & Cheshire, Leonard, Again and Beyond: Private Contractors, Contract and s 6(3)(b) of the Human Rights Act, 2005 Pub. L. 785.Google Scholar

Dumberry, Patrick & Dumas-Aubin, Gabrielle, How to Impose Human Rights Obligations on Corporations, 4 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 569 (2011–12).Google Scholar

Eberle, Edward J., The Architecture of First Amendment Free Speech, Mich. St. L. Rev. 1191 (2011).Google Scholar

Edwards, Denis J., Fearing Federalism’s Failure: Subsidiarity in the European Union, 44 Am. J. Comp. L. 537 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Hage, Javier, How May Tribunals Apply the Customary Necessity Rule to the Argentine Cases?, 2011–12 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 445 (2012).Google Scholar

Emberland, Marius, The Corporate Veil in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights, 63 ZaöRV 945 (2003).Google Scholar

Fallon, Richard, Legitimacy and the Constitution, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1787 (2005).Google Scholar

Ferraz, Octavio Luiz Motta, Harming the Poor through Social Rights Litigation: Lessons From Brazil, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 1643 (2011).Google Scholar

Ferraz, Octavio Luiz Motta, Social and Economic Rights: Harming the Poor through Social Rights Litigation: Lessons from Brazil, 59 Tex. L. Rev. 1643 (2011).Google Scholar

Finn, Paul, Fiduciary Reflections, 88 Austl. L.J. 127 (2014).Google Scholar

Fischer, Thomas C., “Federalism” in the European Community and the United States: A Rose by Any Other Name … , 17 Fordham Int’l L.J. 389 (1994).Google Scholar

Fisher-Lescano, Andrea & Teubner, Gunther, Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law, 25 Mich. J. Int’l. Law 999, 1004 (2004).Google Scholar

Fleming, James E., The Missing Selves in Constitutional Self-Government, 71 Fordham L. Rev. 1789 (2003).Google Scholar

Fombad, Charles Manga, Some Perspectives on Durability and Change under Modern African Constitutions, 11 Int’l J. Const. L. (I•CON) 382 (2013).Google Scholar

Frankel, Richard, Regulating Privatized Government Through § 1983, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1449 (2009).Google Scholar

Frankel, Tamar, Fiduciary Law, 71 Calif. L. Rev. 795 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedland, Mark, Privatising Carltona: Part II of the Deregulation and Contracting Out Act 1994, Pub. L. 21 (1995).Google Scholar

Freedland, Mark, Public Law and Private Finance: Placing the Private Finance Initiative in a Public Law Frame, Pub. L. 288 (1998).Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody, Extending Public Law Norms through Privatization, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 1285 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Jody, The Private Role in Public Governance, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 543 (2000).Google Scholar

Friedman, Barry, Dialogue and Judicial Review, 91 Mich. L. Rev. 577 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedmann, W.G., Public and Private Law Thinking: The Need for Synthesis, 5 Wayne L. Rev. 291 (1958–59).Google Scholar

Friendly, Henry J., The Public-Private Penumbra—Fourteen Years Later, 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1289 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox-Decent, Evan & Criddle, Evan J., The Fiduciary Constitution of Human Rights, 15 Legal Theory 301 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, Paul, The Irish Constitution—Its Unique Nature and the Relevance of International Jurisprudence, 45 Irish Jurist 22 (2010).Google Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen, The Horizontal Effect of Constitutional Rights, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 387 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geistfeld, Mark A., The Doctrinal Unity of Alternative Liability and Market-Share Liability, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. 447 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giegerich, Thomas, The Is and the Ought of International Constitutionalism: How Far Have We Come on Habermans’s Road to a “Well-Considered Constitutionalization of International Law”?, 10 German L. J. 31 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilman, Michele Estrin, Legal Accountability in an Era of Privatized Welfare, 89 Cal. L. Rev. 569 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom & Melton, James, Does the Constitutional Amendment Rule Matter at All? Amendment Cultures and the Challenges of Measuring Amendment Difficulty (May 3, 2014), University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 682, University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 472, available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=2432520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennon, Robert J. Jr. & Nowak, John E., A Functional Analysis of the Fourteenth Amendment “State Action” Requirement, 1976 Sup. Ct. Rev. 221 (1976).Google Scholar

Gold, Andrew S., Reflections on the State as Fiduciary, 63 U. of Toronto L.J. 655 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gore, Charles, The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries, 28 World Dev. 789 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gosling, Martin, The Global Trend towards Private Prisons, 170 Just. of the Peace & Loc. Gov’t L. 892 (2006).Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W. & Keohane, Robert O., Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics, 99 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 29 (Feb. 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Leslie, Two Views of Collective Rights, 4 Can. J. Law Jurisprudence 315 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, Abner S., The Irreducible Constitution, 7 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 293 (1996).Google Scholar

Grey, Thomas C., Molecular Motions: The Holmesian Judge in Theory and Practice, 37 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 19 (1995).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for a World Society, 15 Constellations 445 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, The Federalist No. 70, No. 72 (J. Cooke ed., 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, Carol, ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ Law: Definition without Distinction, 43 Mod. L. Rev. 241 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, Foreword: Positive Rights and State Constitutions, 33 Rutgers L.J. 799 (2002).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, Horizontality and the “Spooky” Doctrines of American Law, 59 Buff. L. Rev. 455 (2011).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, “Just Words”: Common Law and the Enforcement of State Constitutional Social and Economic Rights, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1521 (2010).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, Lecture, The Private Life of Public Rights: State Constitutions and the Common Law, 88 N.Y.U. L. Rev. Online 1 (2013).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, The New Jersey Constitution: Positive Rights, Common Law Entitlements, and State Action, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 553 (2006).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, Positive Rights and State Constitutions: The Limits of Federal Rationality Review, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 1131 (1999).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen, Welfare Devolution and State Constitutions, 67 Fordham L. Rev. 1403 (1999).Google Scholar

Hershkoff, Helen & Loffredo, Stephen, State Courts and Constitutional Socio-Economic Rights: Exploring the Underutilization Thesis, 115 Penn St. L. Rev. 923 (2011).Google Scholar

Higgins, Tracy E., Anti-Essentialism, Relativism, and Human Rights, 19 Harv. Women’s L.J. 89 (1996).Google Scholar

Hogan, Gerard, Directive Principles, Socio-Economic Rights and the Constitution, 36 Irish Jurist 174 (2001).Google Scholar

Hogg, Peter W. & Bushell, Allison A., The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing after All), 35 Osgoode Hall L.J. 75 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied to Legal Reasoning, 23 Yale L.J. 16 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horowitz, Harold W., The Misleading Search for “State Action” under the Fourteenth Amendment, 30 S. Cal. L. Rev. 208 (1956–57).Google Scholar

Iacobucci, Frank, The Charter: 20 Years Later, 21 Windsor Y.B. Access to Just. 3 (2002).Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki C., Being Proportional about Proportionality, 21 Const. Comment. 803 (2004).Google Scholar

Jacoby, Tamar, The Reagan Turnaround on Human Rights, 64 Foreign Aff. 1066 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jain, Neha, General Principles of Law as Gap-Fillers (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Jensen, Darryn, Prescription and Proscription in Fiduciary Obligations, 21 King’s L.J. 333 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Bruce & Youm, Kyu Ho, Commercial Speech and Free Expression: The United States and Europe Compared, 2 J. Int’l Media & Ent. L. 159 (2008).Google Scholar

Kabeer, Naila, Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Analysis of the Third Millennium Development Goal, 13 Gender & Dev. 13 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kadens, Emily, The Myth of Customary Law Merchant, 90 Tex. L. Rev. 1153 (2012).Google Scholar

Katz, Al, Studies in Boundary Theory: Three Essays in Adjudication and Politics, 28 Buff. L. Rev. 383 (1978).Google Scholar

Kaye, Judith S., Foreword: The Common Law and State Constitutional Law as Full Partners in the Protection of Individual Rights, 23 Rutgers L.J. 727 (1992).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational, 54 Int’l Org. 457 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Sung Hui, The Last Temptation of Congress: Legislator Insider Trading and the Fiduciary Norm against Corruption, 98 Cornell L. Rev. 845 (2013).Google Scholar

Kincaid, John, From Cooperative to Coercive Federalism, 509 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 139 (1990).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict & Stewart, Richard, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 Law & Contemp. Probs. 15 (2005).Google Scholar

Knop, Karen, Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts, 32 NYU J. Int’l L. & Politics 501 (2000).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization, 8 Theoretical Inquiries in L. 9, 17 (2006).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law—The Function and Scope of the Lex Specialis Rule and the Question of “Self-Contained Regimes”: An Outline, 6(1) Transnat’l Disp. Mgmt (2009).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics, 70 Mod. L. Rev. 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti & Leino, Päivi, Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties, 15 Leiden J. Int’ l L. 553 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Larry & Sykes, Alan O., Municipal Liability Under § 1983: A Legal and Economic Analysis, 1987 Sup. Ct. Rev. 249 (1987).Google Scholar

Krent, Harold J., Power, Federal, Non-Federal Actors: The Ramifications of Free Enterprise Fund, 79 Fordham L. Rev. 2425 (2011).Google Scholar

Krent, Harold J., Reconceptualizing Sovereign Immunity, 45 Vand. L. Rev. 1529, 1529 (1992).Google Scholar

Kritchevsky, Barbara, Civil Rights Liability of Private Entities, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 35 (2004).Google Scholar

Landau, David, The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement, 53 Harv. Int’l L.J. 402 (2012).Google Scholar

Law, David S., The Anatomy of a Conservative Court, 87 Tex L Rev. 1545 (2009).Google Scholar

Law, David S., Why Has Judicial Review Failed in Japan?, 88 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1425 (2011).Google Scholar

Law, David S. & Versteeg, Mila, The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 1163, 1170 (2011).Google Scholar

Leib, Ethan J. & Ponet, David L., Fiduciary Representation and Deliberative Engagement with Children, 20 J. Pol. Phil. 178 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, Ralph, The Supreme Court as Republican Schoolmaster, 1967 Sup. Ct. Rev. 127.Google Scholar

Levinson, Daryl J., Making Government Pay: Markets, Politics, and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs, 67 U. Chi. L. Rev. 345 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loffredo, Stephen, Poverty, Inequality, and Class in the Structural Constitutional Law Course, 34 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1239 (2007).Google Scholar

Löwenheim, Oded, Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’, 29 Third World Q. 255 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lutz, Donald S., The United States Constitution as an Incomplete Text, 496 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 23 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manning, Bayless, Corporate Power and Individual Freedom: Some General Analysis and Particular Reservations, 55 Nw. U. L. Rev. 38 (1960).Google Scholar

Mashaw, Jerry L., Civil Liability of Government Officers: Property Rights and Official Accountability, 42 Law & Contemp. Probs. 8 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGovern, Shannon K., Note, A New Model for States as Laboratories for Reform: How Federalism Informs Education Policy, 86 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1519 (2011).Google Scholar

McLachlin, Campbell, Investment Treaties and General International Law, 57 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 361, 369 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLachlan, Campbell, The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, 54 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 279 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medina, Barak, Constitutional Limits to Privatization: The Israeli Supreme Court Decision to Invalidate Prison Privatization, 8 Int’l J. Const. L. 690 (2010).Google Scholar

Merry, Sally Engle, Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance, 103 Am. Soc’y of Int’l L. Proc. Ann. Meeting 239 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merry, Sally Engle, Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance, 52 Current Anthropology S83 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelman, Frank I., On the Uses of Interpretive ‘Charity’: Some Notes on Application, Avoidance, Equality, and Objective Unconstitutionality from the 2007 Term of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, 1 Const. Ct. Rev. 1 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelman, Frank I., The Bill of Rights, The Common Law, and the Freedom-Friendly State, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 401 (2003).Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I., The Supreme Court and Litigation Access Fees: The Right to Protect One’s Rights—Part I 1973, Duke L.J. 1153 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelman, Frank I., W(H)ither the Constitution?, 21 Cardozo L. Rev. 1063 (2000).Google Scholar

Miller, Paul B., Justifying Fiduciary Remedies, 63 U. Toronto L.J. 570 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Paul B., Multiple Loyalties and the Conflicted Fiduciary, 40 Queen’s L.J. 301 (2014).Google Scholar

Minow, Martha, Public and Private Partnerships: Accounting for the New Religion, 116 Harv. L. Rev. 1229 (2002–03).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mokhiber, Craig G., Toward a Measure of Dignity: Indicators for Rights-Based Development, 18 Stat. J. United Nations Econ. Commission Eur. 155 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mortenson, Julian Davis, The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History, 107 Am. J. Int’l L. 780 (2013).Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, A Powerless Companion: Human Rights in the Age of Neoliberalism, 77 Law & Contemp. Probs. 147(2015).Google Scholar

Mullan, David, Underlying Constitutional Principles: The Legacy of Justice Rand, 34 Manitoba L.J. 1 (2010).Google Scholar

Mureinik, Etienne, A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights, (1994) 10 S. Afr. J. on Hum. Rts. 31.Google Scholar

Nelson, Caleb, Sovereign Immunity as a Doctrine of Personal Jurisdiction, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 1559 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Neufville, Judith Innes, Social Indicators of Basic Needs: Quantitative Data for Human Rights Policy, 11 Soc. Indicators Res. 383 (1982).Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora, The Dark Side of Human Rights, 81 Int’l Aff. 427 (2005).Google Scholar

Odomusu, Ibironke T., The Law and Politics of Engaging Resistance in Investment Dispute Settlement, 26 Penn St. Int’l L. Rev. 251 (2007).Google Scholar

Oliver, Dawn, Common Values in Public and Private Law and the Public/Private Divide, Pub. L. 630 (1997).Google Scholar

Palmer, Stephanie, Public Functions and Private Services: A Gap in Human Rights Protection, 6 Int’l J. Const. L. 585 (2008).Google Scholar

Paparinskis, Martins, Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility, 24 Eur. J. Int’l. 617 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, Michael J., The Morality of Human Rights, 50 San Diego L. Rev 775 (2013).Google Scholar

Perry, Stephen R., Protected Interests and Undertakings in the Law of Negligence, 42 U. Toronto L.J. 247 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, Anne, Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures, 19 Leiden J. Int’l. L. 570 (2006).Google Scholar

Pildes, Richard H., Avoiding Balancing: The Role of Exclusionary Reasons in Constitutional Law, 45 Hastings L J. 711 (1994).Google Scholar

Ponet, David L. & Leib, Ethan J., Fiduciary Law’s Lessons for Deliberative Democracy, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 1207 (2011).Google Scholar

Posit, Dorrit & Casale, Daniela, Expert Paper, Gender, Education and Labour Market Outcomes, U.N. Women, Expert Grp. Meeting, Nov. 3–5, 2014.Google Scholar

Poto, Margherita, The Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Perspective, 8 German L.J. 835 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, Thomas G., State Action: A Pathology and a Proposed Cure, 64 Cal. L. Rev. 146 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ratliff, Warren L., The Due Process Failure of America’s Prison Privatization Statutes, 21 Seton Hall Legis. J. 371 (1997).Google Scholar

Randall, Maya Hertig, Commercial Speech under the European Convention on Human Rights: Subordinate or Equal?, 6 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 53 (2006).Google Scholar

Rave, D. Theodore, Politicians as Fiduciaries, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 671 (2013).Google Scholar

Redish, Martin H. & Marshall, Lawrence C., Adjudicatory Independence and the Values of Procedural Due Process, 95 Yale L. J. 455 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System, 107 Am. J. Int’l L. 45 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodriguez, Daniel B., State Constitutional Failure, 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1243 (2011).Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Garavito, César, Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 1669 (2011)Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion?, XLIV J Econ. Literature 973 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roosevelt, Franklin D., “Unless There is Security Here at Home, There Cannot Be Lasting Peace in the World”—Message to the Congress on the State of the Union, 13 Pub. Papers 32, 41 (Jan. 11, 1944).Google Scholar

Rosatti, Horacio Daniel, Los tratados bilaterales de inversión, el arbitraje internacional obligatorio y el sistema constitucional argentine, No. 198 La Ley 198 (Oct. 15, 2003).Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Lawrence, A Theory of Governmental Damages Liability: Torts, Constitutional Torts, and Takings, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 797 (2007).Google Scholar

Rosga, AnnJannette & Satterthwaite, Margaret L., The Trust in Indicators: Measuring Human Rights 2 (Ctr. for Hum. Rts. & Global Just. Working paper, Number 20).Google Scholar

Ross, Howard, UN Body Criticizes Development Aid: Report Urges Wealthy Countries to Divert Spending to Basic Needs, The Globe and Mail, May 21, 1991.Google Scholar

Rostow, Eugene V., The Democratic Character of Judicial Review, 66 Harv. L. Rev. 193 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostron, Allen, Beyond Market Share Liability: A Theory of Proportional Share Liability for Non-Fungible Products, 52 UCLA L. Rev. 151 (2004).Google Scholar

Rozakis, C., The Right to a Fair Trial in Civil Cases, 4 Jud. Stud. Inst. J. 96 (2004).Google Scholar

Rubenstein, W.B., The Concept of Equality in Civil Procedure (UCLA Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 01–18).Google Scholar

Salmon, J., A Perspective on the Corporate Transformation of Healthcare, 25 Int’l J. Health Services 11 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarfaty, Galit A., Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: The Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank, 103 Am. J. Int’l L. 647 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, Ashwander Revisited, 1995 Sup. Ct. Rev. 71 (1995).Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David, The Global Regime of Investor Rights: Return to the Standards of Civilised Justice? 5 Transnat’l Legal Theory 60 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiderman, David, Legitimacy and Reflexivity in International Investment Arbitration: A New Self-Restraint?, 2 Int’l J. Disp. Mgmt. 47 (2011).Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David, Revisiting the Depoliticization of Investment Disputes, 2010–11 Y.B. on Int’l Investment L. & Pol’y 693 (2012).Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, From ICSID Annulment to Appeal Half Way Down the Slippery Slope, 10 L. & Prac. of Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 211 (2011).Google Scholar

Scolnicov, Anat., Lifeless and Lifelike in Law: Do Corporations Have Human Rights?, available at dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2268537.Google Scholar

Seidman, Louis Michael, The State Action Paradox, 10 Const. Comment. 379 (1993).Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law, 250 Recueil des Cours, Acad. de Droit Int’l de la Haye 217 (1997).Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights, 60 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 573 (2011).Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno, Self-Contained Regimes, 15 Neth. Y.B. Int’l Law 111 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, Joseph W., The Legal Rights Debate in Analytical Jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld, 1982 Wis. L. Rev. 975(1982).Google Scholar

Sklansky, David A., Private Policing and Human Rights, 5 L. & Ethics of Hum. Rts. (2011).Google Scholar

Sloane, Robert D., On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility, 106 Am. J. Int’l L. 447 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Barbara Rook, Private Motivation, State Action and the Allocation of Responsibility for Fourteenth Amendment Violations, 75 Cornell L. Rev. 1052 (1990).Google Scholar

Spector, Horacio, Constitutional Transplants and the Mutation Effect, 83 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 129 (2008).Google Scholar

Sripati, Vijayashri & Thiruvengedam, Arun K., India: Constitutional Amendment Making the Right to Education a Fundamental Right, 2 Int’l. J of Const. L. 148 (2004).Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Participation and Responsiveness, 108 Am. J. Int’l L. 211 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strine, Leo, Hamermesh, Lawrence, Balotti, R. Franklin & Gorris, Jeffrey M., Loyalty’s Core Demand: The Defining Role of Good Faith in Corporation Law, 93 Geo. L.J. 629 (2010).Google Scholar

Supiot, Alain, État social et mondialisation: analyse juridique des solidarités, 2012–2013 Year 113 (113e année) Annuarie C. France 717 (2014).Google Scholar

Supiot, Alain, Le rêve de l’harmonie par le calcul, Le Monde Diplomatique, Feb. 2015 (Fr.).Google Scholar

Sweet, Alex Stone, Investor-State Arbitration: Proportionality’s New Frontier, 4 L. & Ethics of Hum. Rts. 47 (2010).Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone & della Cananea, Giacinto, Proportionality, General Principles of Law, and Investor-State Arbitration: A Response to Jose Alvarez, 46 (3) N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 911, 940 (2014)Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone & Mathews, Jud, Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism, 47 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 72 (2008).Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., The Economics of Vicarious Liability, 93 Yale L.J. 1231 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Symposium, Charter Dialogue: Ten Years Later, 45 Osgoode Hall L.J. 1 (2007).Google Scholar

Symposium, The Proliferation of International Tribunals: Piercing together the Puzzle, 31 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 679 (1999).Google Scholar

Tasioulas, John, Taking Rights out of Human Rights, 120 Ethics 647 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by ‘Private’ Transnational Actors, 69 Mod. L. Rev. 327 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Constitutionalizing Polycontexturality, 20 Soc. & Legal Stud. 210 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences, 61 Mod. L. Rev. 11 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, 17 Law & Soc’y Rev 239 (1982–83).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thirlway, Hugh, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 61 (1) Y.B. Int’l L. 1, 113 (1990).Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H., A Constitution We are Amending: In Defense of a Restrained Judicial Role, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 433 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H., Unraveling National League of Cities: The New Federalism and Affirmative Rights to Essential Government Services, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 1065 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turano, Leslie., Charitable Trusts and the Public Service: The Public Accountability of Private Care Providers, 18 King’s L.J. 427 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, An Essay on Right, 62 Tex. L. Rev. 1363 (1984).Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, Civil Rights and Social Rights: The Future of the Reconstruction Amendments, 25 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 1207 (1992).Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, A Response to David Landau, 53 Harv. Int’l L.J. Online 155 (2012).Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark, Shelley v. Kraemer and Theories of Equality, 33 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 383 (1988).Google Scholar

Unterhalter, Elaine, Expert Paper, The MDGs, Girls’ Education and Gender Equality, U.N. Women, Expert Grp. Meeting, Oct. 21–24, 2013.Google Scholar

Van Aaken, Anne, Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Law, 17 Fin. Y.B. Int’l Inv. L. 91 (2006).Google Scholar

van der Walt, Johan, Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights and the Threshold of the Law in View of the Carmichele Saga, 19 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 517 (2003).Google Scholar

van der Walt, Johan, Progressive Indirect Horizontal Effect of the Bill of Rights: Towards a Co-Operative Relation Between Common–Law and Constitutional Jurisprudence, 17 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 341 (2001).Google Scholar

Velasco, Julian, How Many Fiduciary Duties Are There in Corporate Law, 83 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1231 (2010).Google Scholar

Verkuil, Paul R., Privatizing Due Process, 57 Admin. L. Rev. 963 (2005).Google Scholar

Verschraegen, Gert, Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory, 29 J.L. & Soc’y 258 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vischer, Robert K., Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance: Beyond Devolution, 35 Ind. L. Rev. 103 (2001).Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik, International Judicial Independence, (Sept. 2011) (unpublished manuscript).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Borries, Reimer & Hauschild, Malte, Implementing the Subsidiarity Principle, 5 Colum. J. Eur. L. 369 (1999).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefit of the International Rule of Law?, 22 Eur. J. Int’l. 315 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, The Concept and the Rule of Law, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (2008).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, Property, Justification and Need, 6 Can. J. L. and Jurisprudence 185 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weil, Prosper, The Court Cannot Conclude Definitely … Non Liquet Revisited, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 109 (1997).Google Scholar

Wells, Michael L., Identifying State Actors in Constitutional Litigation: Reviving the Role of Substantive Context, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 99 (2004).Google Scholar

Zipursky, Benjamin C., Snyder v. Phelps, Outrageousness, and the Open Texture of Tort Law, 60 DePaul L. Rev. 473 (2011).Google Scholar

Zumbansen, Peer, Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Ambiguities of Public Authority and Private Power, 76 Law & Contemp. Probs. 117 (2013).Google Scholar