Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- PART I INTRODUCTION
- PART II ON THE EVE OF THE NATION-STATE: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE
- PART III THE STATE AND “DANGEROUS POPULATIONS”
- PART IV INSCRIBING MEMBERSHIP AND CONTESTING MEMBERSHIP IN THE NATION
- 7 Challenging Boundaries and Belongings: “Mixed Blood” Allotment Disputes at the Turn of the Twentieth Century
- 8 Belonging and Not: Rossland, British Columbia, during the Great War
- 9 Boundaries and Belonging in Conditions of Extreme Politicization: The Chinese State in Private and Public Spaces, 1949–1968
- 10 Gender and the Reproduction and Maintenance of Group Boundaries: Why the “Secular” State Matters to Religious Authorities in Israel
- PART V BEYOND THE STATE: TRANSNATIONAL FORCES AND THE CHALLENGE TO THE STATE
- PART VI CONCLUSION
- Index
7 - Challenging Boundaries and Belongings: “Mixed Blood” Allotment Disputes at the Turn of the Twentieth Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- PART I INTRODUCTION
- PART II ON THE EVE OF THE NATION-STATE: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE
- PART III THE STATE AND “DANGEROUS POPULATIONS”
- PART IV INSCRIBING MEMBERSHIP AND CONTESTING MEMBERSHIP IN THE NATION
- 7 Challenging Boundaries and Belongings: “Mixed Blood” Allotment Disputes at the Turn of the Twentieth Century
- 8 Belonging and Not: Rossland, British Columbia, during the Great War
- 9 Boundaries and Belonging in Conditions of Extreme Politicization: The Chinese State in Private and Public Spaces, 1949–1968
- 10 Gender and the Reproduction and Maintenance of Group Boundaries: Why the “Secular” State Matters to Religious Authorities in Israel
- PART V BEYOND THE STATE: TRANSNATIONAL FORCES AND THE CHALLENGE TO THE STATE
- PART VI CONCLUSION
- Index
Summary
Introduction
In 1890, Jane Waldron, a woman of American Indian and European descent, asserted that as an Indian head of family, she was eligible for a full allotment of land that had previously formed part of the Great Sioux Reservation. Her claim initiated a local, legal dispute that quickly escalated into a national debate about land allotment policies conducted at the highest levels of the U.S. government. Black Tomahawk, a “full blood” Indian, contested Waldron's claim. His lawyer argued that Waldron was not an Indian but a white woman, on the basis of the common law of paternal descent. In the initial decision in the case, the Secretary of the Interior accepted the latter position and ruled that Waldron was not an Indian and, therefore, ineligible for an allotment. This decision met with immediate opposition because it implied that thousands of indigenous people of American Indian and European descent, commonly referred to as “mixed bloods,” who had signed Indian treaties with the U.S. government, were not Indians either and, therefore, may not have been eligible signatories. The Secretary's decision thus had the potential to threaten the validity of many treaties concluded with Indian tribes, and it never achieved the status of legal precedent.
In 1905, fifteen years after the dispute began, a district court judge in South Dakota reversed the initial decision and asserted that Waldron was an Indian and, therefore, was eligible for the contested allotment.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Boundaries and BelongingStates and Societies in the Struggle to Shape Identities and Local Practices, pp. 151 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
- 1
- Cited by