Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:46:18.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Boundaries and Belonging in Conditions of Extreme Politicization: The Chinese State in Private and Public Spaces, 1949–1968

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Neil J. Diamant
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Asian Law and Culture Dickinson College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Joel S. Migdal
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The modern state, we have come to learn, is an extremely ambitious organization, prone to deep societal penetration, territorial expansion, and boundary creations. But among modern states, or at least those that aspire to this status, few are as ambitious as those whose leaders rose to power claiming the birth of a new, revolutionary order. In revolutions, very little is sacrosanct; everything is open to debate and change. The perquisites of class, status, and privilege are rethought and sometimes radically altered, as are criteria for membership in favored and out-of-favor groups when revolutionaries go about rewarding those who supported them and punishing those who did not. In addition, the sources of authority, legitimacy, and methods of governance are reexamined in light of new understandings of what is “fair,” “right,” and “just.” Domestic and private matters, such as love, marriage, divorce, and the appropriate sexual division of labor in the family, are also reexamined. Tellingly, some of the very first pieces of legislation passed by French, Chinese, and Soviet revolutionaries dealt with marriage and the family. Methods of chronicling time itself also change. In China, for instance, the Republican revolution of 1911 renumbered all subsequent years as if 1911 was year “0”; in Taiwan the year 2004 is “92.” Conceptions and use of the state's internal space are not exempt from reevaluation, either.

Type
Chapter
Information
Boundaries and Belonging
States and Societies in the Struggle to Shape Identities and Local Practices
, pp. 205 - 225
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×