Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:02:08.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2022

Philip Schofield
Affiliation:
University College London
Xiaobo Zhai
Affiliation:
Universidade de Macau
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Grote Papers, British Library Additional Manuscripts (BL Add. MS) 33.Google Scholar
University College London collection of Bentham manuscripts (UC), boxes i–clxxvi.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

1774 White Bull (London: J. Bew).Google Scholar
1776Short Review of the Declaration’, in The Declaration of Independence: A Global History, ed. Armitage, D. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 173–86.Google Scholar
1776Short Review of the Declaration’, in An Answer to the Declaration of the American Congress, ed. Lind, J. (London: T. Cadell), 119–32.Google Scholar
1778 View of the Hard-Labour Bill; being an abstract of a pamphlet intituled ‘Draught of a bill, to punish by imprisonment and hard labour, certain offenders; and to establish proper places for their reception’. Interspersed with observations relative to the subject of the above draught in particular, and to jurisprudence in general (London: T. Payne).Google Scholar
1795 Supply Without Burthen; or Escheat vice Taxation (London: J. Debrett).Google Scholar
1802 Traités de législation civile et pénale, ed. Dumont, É., 3 vols. (Paris).Google Scholar
1808 Scotch Reform; considered, with reference to the Plan, proposed in the Late Parliament, for the regulation of the Courts, and the Administration of Justice, in Scotland: with Illustrations from English Non-reform: in the course of which divers imperfections, abuses, and corruptions, in the Administration of Justice, with their causes, are now, for the first time, brought to light. In a series of Letters, addressed to the Right Hon. Lord Grenville (London: Richard Taylor and Co.).Google Scholar
1811 Scotch Reform (London: J. Ridgway).Google Scholar
1817 Plan of Parliamentary Reform (London: R. Hunter).Google Scholar
1818 Church-of-Englandism and its Catechism Examined (London: Effingham Wilson).Google Scholar
1821 The Elements of the Art of Packing, as applied to Special Juries, particularly in cases of libel law (London: Effingham Wilson).Google Scholar
1823 Traité des Preuves Judiciares, ed. Dumont, E. (Paris: Bossange Frères).Google Scholar
1823Leading Principles of a Condtitutional Code, for any state’, The Pamphleteer 22, no. 44, 476–86.Google Scholar
1825 The Rationale of Reward, ed. Smith, R. (London: John and H. L. Hunt).Google Scholar
1827 Rationale of Judicial Evidence, specially applied to English practice, 5 vols. ed. Mill, J. S. (London: Hunt and Clarke).Google Scholar
1830 The Rationale of Punishment (London: Robert Heward).Google Scholar
1832 Lord Brougham Displayed (London: Robert Heward).Google Scholar
1843 The Works of Jeremy Bentham, published under the Superintendence of his Executor, Bowring, J., 11 vols. (Edinburgh: William Tait).Google Scholar
1896 Theory of Legislation, trans. Hildreth, R. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.).Google Scholar
1954 Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings, Volume 3, ed. Stark, W. (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
1968 Correspondence, Vol. 2, 1777–1780, ed. Sprigge, T. L. S. (London: Athlone (CW)).Google Scholar
1968–2022 The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Burns, J. H., Dinwiddy, J. R, Rosen, F., and Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press; London: Oxford University Press), henceforth (CW).Google Scholar
1969Indirect Legislation’, in A Bentham Reader, ed. Mack, M. P. (New York: Pegasus).Google Scholar
1970 Of Laws in General, ed. Hart, H. L. A (London: The Athlone Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1970/1996 An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (London: Athlone Press [CW]). Republished with a new introduction by Rosen, F. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1977 A Comment on the Commentaries and a Fragment on Government, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (London: Athlone [CW]).Google Scholar
1983 Constitutional Code, Volume I, ed. Rosen, F. and Burns, J. H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1983 Chrestomathia, ed. Smith, M. J. and Burston, W. H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1983 Deontology together with A Table of the Springs of Action and Article on Utilitarianism, ed. Goldworth, A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1988 A Fragment on Government, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
1989 First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code, ed. Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1990 Securities against Misrule, and Other Constitutional Writings for Tripoli and Greece, ed. Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1993 Official Aptitude Maximized; Expense Minimized, ed. Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1995 Colonies, Commerce, and Constitutional Law: Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria; and Other Writings on Spain and Spanish America, ed. Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1998 ‘Legislator of the World’: Writings on Codification, Law, and Education, ed. Schofield, P. and Harris, J. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
1999 Political Tactics, ed. James, M., Blamires, C., and Watkin, C. P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2000 The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham: Volume 11, ed. Fuller, C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2001 Writings on the Poor Laws: I, ed. Quinn, M. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2002 Rights, Representation and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and other writings on the French Revolution, ed. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkin, C., and Blamires, C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2004 Chrestomatia, ed. Cléro, J.-P. (Paris: L’Unebévue).Google Scholar
2006 The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham: Volume 12, ed. O’Sullivan, L. and Fuller, C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2008 A Comment on the Commentaries and a Fragment on Government, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2010 Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence, ed. Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2010 Traités de législation civile et pénale, ed. Dumont, E., pref. Bozzo-Rey, M., Brunon-Ernst, A., de Champs, E. (Paris: Dalloz).Google Scholar
2010 Writings on the Poor Laws: II, ed. Quinn, M. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2011 Church-of Englandism and its Catechism Examined, ed. Crimmins, J. E. and Fuller, C. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2011 Selected Writings: Jeremy Bentham, ed. Engelmann, S. G. (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
2012 On the Liberty of the Press, and Public Discussion and other Legal and Political Writings for Spain and Portugal, ed. Pease-Watkin, C. and Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2013 Not Paul, but Jesus. Vol. III. Doctrine, ed. Schofield, P., Quinn, M., and Pease-Watkin, C. (London: University College London Press).Google Scholar
2014 Of Sexual Irregularities, and Other Writings on Sexual Morality, ed. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkin, C., and Quinn, M. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2015 The Book of Fallacies, ed. Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2016 Preparatory Principles, ed. Long, D. G. and Schofield, P. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2016 Writings on Political Economy: I, ed. Quinn, M. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2018 Writings on Political Economy, Volume III: Preventive Police, ed. Quinn, M. (London: Bentham Project).Google Scholar
2018 Writings on Australia, II. History of Jeremy Bentham’s dealings with Lord Pelham, ed. Causer, T. and Schofield, P., www.ucl.ac.uk/bentham-project.Google Scholar
2019 Writings on Political Economy: II, ed. Quinn, M. (Oxford: Clarendon Press [CW]).Google Scholar
2022 Panopticon versus New South Wales and other writings on Australia, ed. Causer, T. and Schofield, P. (London: University College London Press [CW]).Google Scholar
Albiston, C. 2018Democracy, Civil Society, and Public Interest Law’, Wisconsin Law Review 2, 187214.Google Scholar
Armitage, D. 2011Globalizing Jeremy Bentham’, History of Political Thought 32, 6382.Google Scholar
Arneil, B. 2018 Domestic Colonies: The Turn Inward to Colony (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Arneil, B. 2021Jeremy Bentham: Pauperism, Colonialism, and Imperialism’, American Political Science Review, 115, 1147–58.Google Scholar
Atienza, M. 2019Legislation and Argumentation: Towards a Model for the Analysis of Legislative Reasoning’, in Conceptions and Misconceptions of Legislation, ed. Oliver-Lalana, A. D. (Cham: Springer), 175206.Google Scholar
Austin, J. 1879 Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law, 4th ed., 2 vols., ed. Campbell, R (London: John Murray).Google Scholar
Austin, J. 1998 The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and The Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence (first published 1832), ed. Hart, H. L. A. (Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett).Google Scholar
Bahmueller, C. 1981 The National Charity Company: Jeremy Bentham’s Silent Revolution (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Baker, K. M. 2017Constitution’, in Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française, t. 3 Institutions et creations, ed. Furet, F. and Ozouf, M. (Paris: Flammarion), 179205.Google Scholar
Ball, T. 1980Utilitarianism, Feminism and the Franchise: James Mill and His Critics’, History of Political Thought 1, 91115.Google Scholar
Ball, T. 1980Was Bentham a Feminist?’, The Bentham Newsletter 4, 2531.Google Scholar
Baranger, D. 2018. Penser la loi. Essai sur le législateur des temps modernes (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
Bastid, P. 1985. L’idée de constitution, [1962–1963] (Paris: Economica).Google Scholar
Beauchamp[G. Grote], P. 1822 Analysis of the Influence of Natural Religion (London: R. Carlile).Google Scholar
Beaud, O. 2009. ‘L’histoire du concept de constitution en France. De la constitution politique à la constitution comme statut juridique de l’Etat.’ Jus politicum, 3, http://juspoliticum.com/article/L-histoire-du-concept-de-constitution-en-France-De-la-constitution-politique-a-la-constitution-comme-statut-juridique-de-l-Etat-140.html.Google Scholar
Bedau, H. A. 2000“Anarchical Fallacies”: Bentham’s Attack on Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 22, 261–79.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, O. 2000 Constitutional Limits and the Public Sphere: A Critical Study of Bentham’s Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart).Google Scholar
Blackstone, W. 1765–9 Commentaries on the Laws of England (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Blackstone, W. 1975 Commentaries on the Laws of England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, H. St. J. 1735 A Dissertation Upon Parties (London: R. Francklin).Google Scholar
Bourcier, B. 2017Le Plus Grand Bonheur pour le Plus Grand Nombre de Jeremy Bentham: un Utilitarisme Cosmopolitique’, Philosophical Enquiries: Revue des Philosophies Anglophones 9, 59-77.Google Scholar
Bourcier, B. 2021 ‘Bentham’s International Political Theory: Taking States’ Responsibilities Seriously’, Utilitas, 33, 287–303, doi:10.1017/S0953820820000448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzo-Rey, M. 2010 ‘Publicity and Nomography: Bentham’s School of Legislation’, Journal of Bentham Studies, doi:10.14324/111.2045-757X.037.Google Scholar
Bozzo-Rey, M. 2011 ‘Bentham et le management des fonctionnaires: utilité, transparence et management de soi’, raison-publique.fr.Google Scholar
Bozzo-Rey, M. 2011La transparence chez Jeremy Bentham: de l’invisibilité d’un concept à sa publicité’, The Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville 32, 89111.Google Scholar
Bozzo-Rey, M., Brunon-Ernst, A., and Quinn, M. (eds.) 2017Indirect Legislation: Jeremy Bentham’s Regulatory Revolution’, History of European Ideas 43, no. 1, 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzo-Rey, M., Brunon-Ernst, A., and Van Waeyenberge, A. (eds.) 2016Nudges: Better Choices?’, The Tocqueville Review / La revue Tocqueville 37.Google Scholar
Brink, D. 2018 ‘Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill-moral-political/.Google Scholar
Brock, G., and Brighouse, H. 2005Introduction’, in The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism, ed. Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 19.Google Scholar
Brown, C. 1992 International Relations Theories: New Normative Approaches (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2007Les métamorphoses panoptiques: de Foucault à Bentham’, Cahiers critiques de philosophie 4, 6071.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2010Délimiter la branche civile du droit: Bentham et la quête impossible’, in Bentham, juriste, ed. Tusseau, G and Bozzo-Rey, M. (Paris: Economica), 177200.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2014Beyond the Genetic Panopticon: The limits of Government Intervention on Citizens’ Bodies’, Implications philosophiques 1, www.implications-philosophiques.org/actualite/une/beyond-the-genetic-panopticon/.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2014Of the Limits of the Civil Branch of Jurisprudence: Background, Definitions and Limits of Bentham’s Discussion on Civil Law in Limits’, in The Legal Philosophy and Influence of Jeremy Bentham. Essays on Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence, ed. Tusseau, G. (London; New York: Routledge), 134–46.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2014 ‘Indirect legislation and Utility: Study of the Effectiveness of Indirect Legislation’, ISUS International Symposium, Yokohama University, Japan, 20–22 August 2014.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2015Le gouvernement des normes: Jeremy Bentham et les instruments de régulation post-modernes’, Archives de philosophie 78, 309–22.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2016Back to the Sources of Nudges, Nudges: Better Choices?’, The Tocqueville Review/ La Revue Tocqueville 27, 99122.Google Scholar
Brunon-Ernst, A. 2017Nudges and the limits of appropriate interference: Reading Backwards from J. S. Mill’s Harm Principle to Jeremy Bentham’s Indirect Legislation’, History of European Ideas 43, 5369.Google Scholar
Burke, E. 1790 Reflections on the Revolution in France, 1790, www.constitution.org/eb/rev_fran.htm.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. 1966Bentham and the French Revolution’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 16, 95114.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. 1973Bentham on Sovereignty’, Northern Ireland Political Quarterly 24, 133–51.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. 1984Jeremy Bentham: From Radical Enlightenment to Political Radicalism’, The Bentham Newsletter 8, 414.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. 2005Happiness and Utility: Jeremy Bentham’s Equation’, Utilitas 17, 4661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos Boralevi, L. 1980In Defense of a Myth’, Bentham Newsletter 4, 3344.Google Scholar
Campos Boralevi, L. 1984 Bentham and the Oppressed (Berlin: W. de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. 1842 On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History, 2nd ed. (London: Chapman and Hall, Strand).Google Scholar
Carter, J. 1889 The Province of the Written and the Unwritten Law (New York: Banks & Brothers).Google Scholar
Cattaneo, L., and Chapman, A. 2010The Process of Empowerment: A Model for Use in Research and Practice’, American Psychologist 65, 646–59.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P. 2020 I Am the People: Reflections on Popular Sovereignty Today (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Chernock, A. 2005Extending the “Right of Election”: Men’s Arguments for Women’s Political Representation in Late Enlightenment Britain’, in Women, Gender and Enlightenment, ed. Knott, S. and Taylor, B. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 587609.Google Scholar
Christensen, D., and Weinstein, J. 2013Defunding Dissent: Restrictions on Aid to NGOs’, Journal of Democracy 24, 7791.Google Scholar
Christie, I. R. 1984 Stress and Stability in Late Eighteenth-Century Britain: Reflections on the British Avoidance of Revolution (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Church-of-Englandism, and its Catechism Examined. British Critic 10 (November 1818), 519–28.Google Scholar
Church-of-Englandism and its Catechism Examined. Quarterly Review 21 (1 January 1819), 167–77.Google Scholar
Church Establishment. Examiner 894 (20 March 1825), 177.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2003 Scandal: The Sexual Politics of the British Constitution (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M., and Porat, I. 2013 Justification and Authority: Proportionality and Constitutional Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 1950Towards Realism in Legisprudence’, Yale Law Journal 59, 886–97.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1983Legisprudence: Problems and Agenda’, Hofstra Law Review 11, 1163–83.Google Scholar
Cornett, J. M. 1997Hoodwink’d by Custom: The Exclusion of Women from Juries in Eighteenth-Century English Law and Literature’, William and Mary Journal of Race, Gender and Social Justice 4, 289.Google Scholar
Cornish, W., Anderson, J. S., Cocks, R., Lobban, M., Polden, P., and Smith, K. 2010 The Oxford History of the Laws of England: Volume XI (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cot, A. 2003“Let there be no distinction between the sexes”: Jeremy Bentham on the Status of Women’, in The Status of Women in Classical Economic Thought, ed. Dimand, R. W. and Nyland, C. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 165–89.Google Scholar
Craig, D. 2012. ‘Burke and the Constitution’, in The Cambridge Companion to Edmund Burke, ed. Dwan, D. and Insole, C. (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press), 104–16.Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E. 1990 Secular Utilitarianism: Social Science and the Critique of Religion in the Thought of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E. 1994Bentham’s Political Radicalism Reexamined’, Journal of the History of Ideas 55, 259–81.Google Scholar
Crimmins, J. E. 2001Bentham’s Religious Radicalism Revisited: A Response to Philip Schofield’. History of Political Thought 22, 494500.Google Scholar
Crompton, L. 1978Jeremy Bentham’s Essay on “Paederasty”: Part 2’, Journal of Homosexuality 4, 91107.Google Scholar
Davidoff, L., and Hall, C. 1987 Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle-Class, 1780–1850 (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
De Champs, E. 2006Les fonctionnaires dans le Code Constitutionnel’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 1. doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.59.Google Scholar
Champs, E. de 2008 ‘La déontologie politique’ ou La pensée constitutionnelle de Jeremy Bentham (Geneva: Droz).Google Scholar
Champs, E. de 2008Propriété et statut personnel chez Jeremy Bentham’, in Le libéralisme au miroir du droit. L’Etat, la personne et la propriété, ed. Bachofen, B. (Paris: ENS éditions), 117–43.Google Scholar
Champs, E. de 2011Constitution and the Code: Jeremy Bentham on the Limits of the Constitutional Branch of Jurisprudence’, The Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville 32, 2142.Google Scholar
Champs, E. de 2014Towards the Pannomion: Limits and Bentham’s French Manuscripts’, in The Legal Philosophy and Influence of Jeremy Bentham. Essays on Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence, ed. Tusseau, G (London; New York: Routledge), 320–37.Google Scholar
Champs, E. de 2015 Enlightenment and Utility: Bentham in French, Bentham in France (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R. 1975Bentham’s Transition to Political Radicalism, 1809–10’, Journal of the History of Ideas 36, 683700.Google Scholar
Dinwiddy, J. R. 2004Bentham on Private Ethics and the Principle of Utility’, in Bentham: Selected Writings, ed. Twining, W. (Stanford: Stanford University Press), 134–54.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1977Social Sciences and Constitutional Rights – the Consequences of Uncertainty’, Journal of Law & Education 6, 312.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1978 Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1982Law as Interpretation’, Critical Inquiry 9, 179200.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1985 A Matter of Principle, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ekins, R. 2012 The Nature of Legislative Intent (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
El Shakankiri, M. 1970 La philosophie juridique de Jeremy Bentham (Paris: LGDJ).Google Scholar
Elster, J. 2013 Securities against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. G. 2001Imagining Interest’, Utilitas 13, 289322.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. G. 2003“Indirect Legislation”: Bentham’s Liberal Government’, Polity 35, 369–88.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. G. 2008Mill, Bentham, and the Art and Science of Government’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 4.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. G. (ed.) 2011 Selected Writings: Jeremy Bentham (New Haven; London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. G. 2014Limits and Indirect Legislation’, in The Legal Philosophy and Influence of Jeremy Bentham: Essays on Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence, ed. Tusseau, G. (London; New York: Routledge), 308–15.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. G., and Pitts, J. 2011Bentham’s “Place and Time”’, The Toqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville 32, 4366.Google Scholar
Ferraro, F. 2010Direct and Indirect Utilitarianism in Bentham’s Theory of Adjudication’, The Journal of Bentham Studies 12, 124.Google Scholar
Ferraro, F. 2011Moral Aptitude and The Moral Sanction in Bentham’s Institutional Architecture: Is There Any Room for Non-Egoistic Motivation?’, in Philosophy and Public Issues–Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 1, 1119.Google Scholar
Ferraro, F. 2013Adjudication and Expectations: Bentham on the Role of the Judges’, Utilitas 25, 140–60.Google Scholar
Fioravanti, M. 1999 Costituzione (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1975 Surveiller et punir – Naissance de la prison (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2008 The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979, ed. Senellart, M., trans. Burchell, G. (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2014 On the Government of the Living: Lectures at the Collège de France 1979–80, ed. Senellart, M., trans. Burchell, G. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 2008 Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (London: Polity).Google Scholar
Fuller, C. 2008 ‘Bentham, Mill, Grote, and An Analysis of the Influence of Natural Religion on the Temporal Happiness of Mankind’, Journal of Bentham Studies 10, 115.Google Scholar
Fuller, C. 2010Utility of Religion a Subject yet Little Examined: A Survey of Bentham’s Writings on the Utility of Religion’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 6, 116.Google Scholar
Gillardin, J. 1987Les principes du code civil d’après Jeremy Bentham’, in Actualité de la pensée juridique de Jeremy Bentham (Brussels: Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis), 549–76.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. 1991 Die Zukunft der Verfassung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Guidi, M. E. L. 2008“Everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one”: The Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests from Bentham to Pigou’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 4, doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.182.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 1989 The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume & Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Halévy, E. 1934 The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism, trans. M. Morris (London: Faber & Faber).Google Scholar
Halévy, E. 1995 [1901–4] La formation du radicalisme philosophique, 3 vols., ed. Canto-Sperber, M. (Paris: PUF).Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Jay, J., and Madison, J. 2001 The Federalist, ed. Carey, G. W. and McClellan, J. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).Google Scholar
Harrison, R. 1983/2008 Bentham (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1982 Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2005 ‘Bentham’s Principle of Utility and Theory of Penal Law’, in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), lxxixcxii.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1973 Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. 1, Rules and Order (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Held, D. 2010 Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
Helvétius, C. A. 1988 De l’esprit (Paris: Fayard).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1968 Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (London: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1986 De Cive: English Version, ed. Warrender, H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1999 Léviathan. Traité de la matière, de la forme et du pouvoir de la république ecclésiastique et civile (Paris: Dalloz).Google Scholar
Hoogensen, G. 2005 International Relations, Security and Jeremy Bentham (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Howley, W. 1814 A Charge Delivered to the Clergy of the Diocese of London (London: T. Bensley).Google Scholar
Hulsebosch, D. J. 1998The Constitution in the Glass Case and Constitutions in Action’, Law and History Review 16, 397401.Google Scholar
Hulsebosch, D. J. 2005 Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1739–40 A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, 3 vols. (London).Google Scholar
Hume, L. J. 1981 Bentham and Bureaucracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Jacques, S., and Schofield, P. (eds.) 2021 Jeremy Bentham on Police: The Unknown Story and What It Means for Criminology (London: University College London Press).Google Scholar
James, M. 1981Public Interest and Majority Rule in Bentham’s Democratic Theory’, Political Theory 9, 4964.Google Scholar
James, M. 1986Bentham’s Democratic Theory at the Time of the French Revolution’, Bentham Newsletter 10, 516.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. W. 2019 Origins of Order: Project and System in the American Legal Imagination (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1996On the Common Saying: This May Be Correct in Theory, but It Is of No Use in Practice’, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 273309.Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1996Toward Perpetual Peace’, in Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 311–51.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A. 2016The Constitutional Separation of Powers’, in Philosophical Foundation of Constitutional Law, ed. Dyzenhaus, D. and Thorburn, M (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 223.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. J. 1990 Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1999 General Theory of Law and State, trans. Wedberg, A. (Union: The Lawbook Exchange).Google Scholar
Kerruish, V. 1992 Jurisprudence as Ideology (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P., and Brown, E. 2019 ‘Cosmopolitanism’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/.Google Scholar
Koh, T. Y. 2019Bentham on Asceticism and Tyranny’, History of European Ideas 45, 114.Google Scholar
Koh, T. Y. 2019Bentham and the Pleasures of Cruelty’, History of Political Thought 40, 699716.Google Scholar
Korshorke, A., Lüdemann, S., Frank, T., and Matala de Mazza, E. 2007 Der fictive Staat. Konstruktionen des politischen Körpers in der Geschichte Europas (Frankfurt-am-Main: Fischer).Google Scholar
Lacey, N. 1998Bentham as proto-feminist? Or an Ahistorical Fantasy on “Anarchical Fallacies”’, Current Legal Problems 51, 441–66.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. 2020 Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Lang, A., and Wiener, A. (eds.) 2017 Handbook on Global Constitutionalism (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Laval, C. 2006La chaîne invisible: Bentham et le néolibéralisme’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 1, https://journals.openedition.org/etudes-benthamiennes/63.Google Scholar
Legrand, S. 2007 Les normes chez Foucault (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 1989 The Province of Legislation Determined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 2005Legislation in a Common Law Context’, Zeitschrift für Neuere Rechtsgeschichte 27, 107–23.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 2007 ‘Bentham’s Constitutional Code and the Politics of Information’. Unpublished paper 2007.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 2011Bentham on Codification’, in Selected Writings of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Engelmann, S. (New Haven: Yale University Press), 460–77.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 2014Of the Limits and the Theory of Legislation’, in The Legal Philosophy and Influence of Jeremy Bentham: Essays on Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence, ed. Tusseau, G. (London: Routledge), 293307.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 2014Bentham’s Jurisprudence and Democratic Theory: An Alternative to Hart’s Approach’ in Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion, ed. Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 119–42.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. 2019Declaring Rights: Bentham and the Rights of Man’, in Philosophy, Rights and Natural Law. Essays in Honour of Knud Haakonssen, ed. Hunter, I. and Whatmore, R. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 306–37.Google Scholar
Lind, J. 1775 Remarks on the principal acts of the Thirteenth Parliament of Great Britain. By the author of Letters concerning the present state of Poland. Vol. I. Containing remarks on the acts relating to the colonies. With a plan of reconciliation (London: T. Payne).Google Scholar
Lobban, M. 1991 The Common Law and English Jurisprudence 1760–1850 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1988 ‘Second Treatise of Government’, in Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 267428.Google Scholar
Lolme, J. L. de. 2007 The Constitution of England (1771), ed. Lieberman, D. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).Google Scholar
Long, D. 1977 Bentham on Liberty: Jeremy Bentham’s Idea of Liberty in Relation to His Utilitarianism (Toronto: Toronto University Press).Google Scholar
Long, D. 2017Claude Adrien Helvétius’, in The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism, reprint ed., ed. Crimmins, J. E (London: Bloomsbury Academic), 233.Google Scholar
Loring, R. 2014The Role of Universal Jurisprudence in Bentham’s Legal Cosmopolitanism’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 13. doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.749.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. 2015 ‘Burke on Law, Revolution and Constitution’, Giornale di storia costituzionale 29, 4960.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. 2015The Constitutional Imagination’. The Modern Law Review 78, 125.Google Scholar
Lovett, F., and Pettit, P. 2009Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program’, Annual Review of Political Science 12, 1129.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 1973 In the Interest of the Governed (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 1991 In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham’s Philosophy of Utility and Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
MacCormick, D. N. 1978Dworkin as Pre-Benthamite’, The Philosophical Review 87, 585607.Google Scholar
Mack, M. P. 1962 Jeremy Bentham: An Odyssey of Ideas, 1748–1792 (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
Maddox, G. 1989. ‘Constitution’, in Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, ed. Ball, T., Farr, J., and Hanson, R. L (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 5067.Google Scholar
Marcilla, G. 2019Proportionality in Lawmaking: An Attempt of Justification in the Light of a Constitutionalist and Argumentative Conception of Law’, in Conceptions and Misconceptions of Legislation, ed. Oliver-Lalana, A. D. (Cham: Springer), 153–73.Google Scholar
Marciniak, A. 2015 Politische Sicherheit. Zur Geschichte eines umstrittenen Konzepts (Frankfurt: Campus).Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H. 1947 Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1981 Autobiography and Literary Essays (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1984 Collected Works XVII, ed. Robson, J. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), 1812.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1991 Considerations on Representative Government (Amherst: Prometheus Books).Google Scholar
Mohnhaupt, H., and Grimm, D. 2002 Verfassung. Zur Geschichte des Begriffs von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart: zwei Studien, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. 1952 The Spirit of Laws (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Brittanica).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. 1989 The Spirit of the Laws, ed. Cohler, A. M., Miller, B. C., and Stone, H. S (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. 1893 The Idea of a University Defined and Illustrated (London: Longmans, Green and Co.).Google Scholar
Niesen, P. 2007The West Divided? Bentham and Kant on Law and Ethics in Foreign Policy’, in Rethinking Ethical Foreign Policy, ed. Chandler, D. and Heins, V. (London; New York: Routledge), 93115.Google Scholar
Niesen, P. 2009Une Petite Mappemonde du Chaos: La Délibération Parlementaire chez Bentham et Dumont’, in Bentham et la France: Fortune et Infortunes de l’Utilitarisme, ed. de Champs, E. and Cléro, J.-P. (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation SVEC), 129–41.Google Scholar
Oliver-Lalana, D. 2013Rational Lawmaking and Legislative Reasoning in Parliamentary Debates’, in The Rationality and Justification of Legislation, ed. Wintgens, L. J. and Oliver-Lalana, A. D. (Cham: Springer), 135–84.Google Scholar
Otonashi, M. 1993 ‘The “Bowring Edition” of The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 1838-1843: Its Formation, Editorial Problem and Editors’, Hitotsubashi University Center for Historical Social Science Literature Study Series 29, http://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/hermes/ir/re/16637/studys0290000010.pdf.Google Scholar
Owen, D. 2012 ‘Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos: On the Place of the All Affected Interests Principle in Democratic Theory and in Resolving the Democratic Boundary Problem’, Ethics and Global Politics 5, 129–52.Google Scholar
Paine, T. 1791 Droits de l’homme; en réponse à l’attaque de M. Burke (Paris: F. Buisson), http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/paine_thomas/droits_de_lhomme/droits_de_lhomme.html.Google Scholar
Peardon, T. P. 1951Bentham’s Ideal Republic’, The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 17, no. 2, 184203.Google Scholar
Perry, S. R. 2001Hart’s Methodological Positivism’, in Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law, ed. Coleman, J. L (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 311–54.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2006Freedom in the Market’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5, 131–49.Google Scholar
Pezet, E. 2007 Management et conduite de soi. Enquête sur les ascèses de la performance (Paris: Vuibert).Google Scholar
Philip, P. 2014 Reforming Ideas in Britain: Politics and Language in the Shadow of the French Revolution, 1789-1815 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Piccinini, M. 2007 Corpo politico, opinione pubblica, societa politica. Per una storia dell’idea inglese di costituzione (Torino: G. Giappichelli).Google Scholar
Pino, G. 2014Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Ratio Juris 27, 190217.Google Scholar
Pitts, J. 2005 A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 103–22.Google Scholar
Pitts, J. 2011“Great and Distant Crimes”. Empire in Bentham’s Thought’, in Jeremy Bentham: Selected Writings, ed. Engelmann, S. (New Haven: Yale University Press), 478–99.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1960Burke and the Ancient Constitution: A Problem in the History of Ideas’, The Historical Journal 3, 125–43.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W. 1992Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty’, Ethics 103, 4875.Google Scholar
Posner, R. 1993 The Problems of Jurisprudence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Postema, G. J. 1986 Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Postema, G. J. 2002Introduction’, in Bentham: Moral, Political and Legal Philosophy, vol. 1, ed. Postema, G. (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Postema, G. J. 2014Law’s Rule: Reflexivity, Mutual Accountability, and the Rule of Law’, in Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion, ed. Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 739.Google Scholar
Postema, G. J. 2014The Soul of Justice: Bentham on Publicity, Law, and the Rule of Law’, in Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion, ed. Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 4062.Google Scholar
Postema, G. J. 2019 Utility, Publicity, and Law: Essays on Bentham’s Moral and Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Postema, G. J. 2019 Bentham and the Common Law Tradition. 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Quinn, M. 2014Popular Prejudices, Real Pains: What Is the Legislator to do When the People Err in Assigning Mischief?’, in Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion, ed. Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 6389.Google Scholar
Quinn, M. 2016Jeremy Bentham, “The Psychology of Economic Man”, and Behavioural Economics’, Œconomia 6, 332.Google Scholar
Quinn, M. 2019 ‘Bentham on Preventive Police: The Calendar of Delinquency in Evaluation of Policy, and the Police Gazette in Manipulation of Opinion’, International Criminal Justice Review, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1057567719827343.Google Scholar
Quinn, M. 2022 Bentham (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999 A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Rhode, D. L. 2004 Access to Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Riley, C. 2018Jeremy Bentham and Equity: The Court of Chancery, Lord Eldon, and the Dispatch Court Plan’, Journal of Legal History 39, 2957.Google Scholar
Riley, C. 2019 ‘The Hermit and the Boa Constrictor: Jeremy Bentham, Henry Brougham, and the Accessibility of Justice’, American Journal of Legal History, 1–26.Google Scholar
Ronzoni, M. 2013For (Some) Political and Institutional Cosmopolitanism, (Even If) against Moral Cosmopolitanism’, in Cosmopolitanism versus Non-cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations, ed. Brock, G. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 156–72.Google Scholar
Rosen, F. 1983 Jeremy Bentham and Representative Democracy: A Study of the Constitutional Code (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Rosen, F. 1983Introduction’. In Bentham, J., Constitutional Code Vol. 1, ed. Rosen, F. and Burns, J. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Rosen, F. 1992 Bentham, Byron, and Greece: Constitutionalism, Nationalism, and Early Liberal Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Rosen, F. 2003 Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N. 1978 Bentham’s Theory of the Modern State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Roth, Andrew ‘Putin approves law targeting journalists as “foreign agents”’. Guardian 3 December 2019, www.theguardian.com/world/2019/dec/03/putin-approves-law-targeting-journalists-foreign-agents.Google Scholar
Rudan, P. 2007 Dalla Costituzione al Governo. Jeremy Bentham e le Americhe. University of Bologna, http://amsdottorato.cib.unibo.it/193/1/Rudan._Jeremy_Bentham_e_le_Americhe.pdf.Google Scholar
Rudan, P. 2016Society as a Code: Bentham and the Fabric of Order’, History of European Ideas 42, 3954.Google Scholar
Rudan, P. 2019Influence as a Constitutional Factor: Bentham’s Public Ethics’, in La déontologie publique. Trajectoire et présence d’une notion ambiguë, ed. Tusseau, G. (Paris: Institut francophone pour la justice et la démocratie, diffusion LGDJ Lextenso), 6577.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. 1962. ‘Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion’, The American Political Science Review 56, 853–64.Google Scholar
Schäfer, A., and Zürn, M. 2021 Die demokratische Regression (Berlin: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. 1997Exploring the Problematic Triumph of Liberal Democracy and Concluding with a Modest Proposal for Improving Its International Impact’, in Democracy’s Victory and Crisis, ed. Hadenius, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 297307.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 1996Bentham on the Identification of Interests’, Utilitas 8, 223–34.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 1999Political and Religious Radicalism in the Thought of Jeremy Bentham’, History of Political Thought 20, 272–91.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 2003Jeremy Bentham’s “Nonsense upon Stilts”’, Utilitas 15, 126.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 2006 Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 2010Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart’s ‘Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence’, Jurisprudence 1, 147–67.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 2011 ‘Jeremy Bentham and the British Intellectual Response to the French Revolution’, Journal of Bentham Studies 13, http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1333215/1/013%20Schofield.pdf.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 2014A Defence of Jeremy Bentham’s Critique of Natural Rights’, in Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion, ed. Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (New York: Cambridge University Press), 208–30.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 2014Jeremy Bentham’, in Constitutions and the Classics, ed. Galligan, D. J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 231–49.Google Scholar
Schofield, P. 2021Jeremy Bentham and the Origins of Legal Positivism’ in The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism, ed. Spaak, T. and Mindus, P. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 203–24.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, M. 2007Jeremy Bentham on Fallibility and Infallibility’, Journal of the History of Ideas 68, 563–85.Google Scholar
Scott, J. W. 1997 Only Paradoxes to Offer (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Shocking and Pernicious Absurdities of Bigotry. Examiner, 559 (13 September 1818), 578–9.Google Scholar
Sieckmann, J. R. 2019Legislation as Balancing’, in Conceptions and Misconceptions of Legislation, ed. Oliver-Lalana, A. D. (Cham: Springer), 133–52.Google Scholar
Sieyès, E.-J. 2009. Qu’est-ce que le Tiers-Etat? (Paris: Flammarion).Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1909 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Bullock, C. J. (New York: P. F. Collier & Son).Google Scholar
Smith, H. L. 2002 All Men and Both Sexes: Gender, Politics, and the False Universal in England, 1640–1832 (University Park: Penn State University Press).Google Scholar
Sokol, M. 2011 Bentham, Law and Marriage: A Utilitarian Code of Law in Historical Contexts (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Splichal, S. 2003Bentham, Kant, and the Right to Communicate’, Critical Review 15, 285305.Google Scholar
Steintrager, J. 1971Morality and Belief: The Origin and Purpose of Bentham’s Writings on Religion’, Mill Newsletter 6, 315.Google Scholar
Steintrager, J. 1980Language and Politics: Bentham on Religion’, Bentham Newsletter 4, 420.Google Scholar
Steintrager, J. 1988Constitution: Changing Meanings of the Term from the Early Seventeenth to the Late Eighteenth Century’, in Conceptual Change and the Constitution, ed. Ball, T. and Pocock, J. G. A. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas), 3554.Google Scholar
Steintrager, J. 1989Vom aristotelischen zum liberalen Verfassungsbegriff’, in Wege zur Grundrechtsdemokratie: Studien zur Begriffs- und Institutionengeschichte des liberalen Verfassungsstaates, ed. Stourzh, G. (Wien: Böhlau), 134.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. 2014 Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Thaler, R., and Sunstein, C. 2008 Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Thompson, W. 1825 An Appeal of One Half of the Human Race, Women, Against the Pretensions of the Other Half, Men, to Retain them in Political, and thence in Civil and Domestic, Slavery; in reply to a paragraph of Mr. Mill’s celebrated ‘Article on Government’ (London: Longman et al.).Google Scholar
Tuori, K. 2002Legislation between Politics and Law’, in Legisprudence: A New Theoretical Approach to Legislation. Proceedings of the Fourth Benelux–Scandinavian Symposium on Legal Theory, ed. Wintgens, L. J (Oxford; Portland: Hart), 99107.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2001 Jeremy Bentham et le droit constitutionnel. Une approche de l’utilitarisme juridique (Paris: L’Harmattan).Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2007Jeremy Bentham on Power-Conferring Laws’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 3, 4877.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2007Positivist Jurisprudents Confronted: Jeremy Bentham and John Austin on the Concept of a Legal Power’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 2, 2337.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2011De Bentham à Kelsen en passant par Merkl, Une trame conceptuelle récurrente de la théorie juridique.’ in Questions contemporaines de théorie analytique du droit / Cuestiones contemporáneas de teoría analítica del derecho / Problemi attuali della teoria analitica del diritto, ed. Brunet, P. and F. J. Arena (Madrid; Barcelona; Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons), 167–97.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2011Bentham et le normativisme viennois. Impressions de lecture’, in Bentham juriste. L’utilitarisme juridique en question, ed. Bozzo, M.-Rey, and Tusseau, G. (Paris: Economica), 43105.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2011 Jeremy Bentham. La guerre des mots (Paris: Dalloz).Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2014An Old English Tale? Bentham’s Theory of The Force of a Law’, in The Legal Philosophy and Influence of Jeremy Bentham. Essays on Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence, ed. Tusseau, G. (London; New York: Routledge), 80133.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2018Deux dogmes du constitutionnalisme’, in Penser le droit à partir de l’individu. Mélanges en hommage à Elisabeth Zoller (Paris: Dalloz), 835–83.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. 2019Towards a Linguistic Criticism of Legal Hegemony: Some Remarks on Bentham v. Judges and Co.’, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 32, 173–94.Google Scholar
Tusseau, G. (forthcoming) ‘The Evolution and Gestalt of the French Constitution’, in Ius Publicum Europaeum, vol. 2., ed. von Bogdandy, A., Huber, P. M., Villalón, P. Cruz, and Ragone, S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Twining, W. L. 1975The Contemporary Significance of Bentham’s Anarchical Fallacies’, Archiv fur Rechts–und Sozialphilosophie 61, 325–56.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, G. 2008Cosmopolitan Patriotism in J.S. Mill’s Thought and Activism’, Revue d’études benthamiennes 4. doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.188.Google Scholar
Vermeule, A. 2015Open-Secret Voting’, in Secrecy and Publicity in Votes and Debates, ed. Elster, J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 215–29.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. 1998 Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).Google Scholar
Voltaire, 2008 Prix de la justice et de l’humanité (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation).Google Scholar
Von Savigny, F. C. 1831 Of the Vocation of our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence, trans. A. Hayward (London: Littlewood & Co.).Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 1999 The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 2016 Political Political Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Webster, N. 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Constitution.Google Scholar
Weinstein, D. 2007Consequentialist Cosmopolitanism’, in Victorian Visions of Global Order, ed. Bell, D. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 267–90.Google Scholar
Whatmore, R. 2014Thomas Paine’, in Constitutions and the Classics: Patterns of Constitutional Thought from Fortescue to Bentham, ed. Galligan, D. J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 414–37.Google Scholar
Williford, M. 1975Bentham on the Rights of Women’, Journal of the History of Ideas 36, 167–76.Google Scholar
Wintgens, L. J. 2006Legisprudence as a New Theory of Legislation’, Ratio Juris 19, 125.Google Scholar
Wintgens, L. J. 2012 ‘Legislation as an Object of Study of Legal Theory’, in Legisprudence: A New Theoretical Approach to Legislation. Proceedings of the Fourth Benelux–Scandinavian Symposium on Legal Theory, ed. Wintgens, L. J. (Oxford; Portland: Hart), 939.Google Scholar
Wintgens, L. J. 2013The Rational Legislator Revisited. Bounded Rationality and Legisprudence’, in The Rationality and Justification of Legislation: Essays in Legisprudence, ed. Wintgens, L. J. and Oliver-Lalana, A. D. (Cham: Springer), 131.Google Scholar
Wolff, J., and Poppe, A. E. 2015 From Closing Space to Contested Spaces: Re-assessing Current Conflicts over International Civil Society Support (Frankfurt: Peace Research Institute).Google Scholar
Wormuth, F. D. 1949 The Origins of Modern Constitutionalism (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Yelle, R. A. 2005Bentham’s Fictions: Canon and Idolatry in the Genealogy of Law’, Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 17, 151–79.Google Scholar
Zhai, Xiaobo 2012 ‘Bentham’s Natural Arrangement Versus Hart’s Morally Neutral Description’, Revue d’études benthamiennes. doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.603.Google Scholar
Zhai, Xiaobo 2014Bentham’s Natural Arrangement and the Collapse of the Expositor-Censor Distinction in the General Theory of Law’, in Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion, ed. Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 143–83.Google Scholar
Zhai, Xiaobo 2017Bentham on the Interpretation of Laws’. Journal of Legal History 38, 282307.Google Scholar
Zhai, Xiaobo 2017Bentham’s Exposition of Common Law’. Law and Philosophy 36, 525–60.Google Scholar
Zhai, X., and Quinn, M. (eds.) 2014 Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion (New York: Cambridge Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Philip Schofield, University College London, Xiaobo Zhai, Universidade de Macau
  • Book: Bentham on Democracy, Courts, and Codification
  • Online publication: 25 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031745.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Philip Schofield, University College London, Xiaobo Zhai, Universidade de Macau
  • Book: Bentham on Democracy, Courts, and Codification
  • Online publication: 25 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031745.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Philip Schofield, University College London, Xiaobo Zhai, Universidade de Macau
  • Book: Bentham on Democracy, Courts, and Codification
  • Online publication: 25 August 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031745.019
Available formats
×