Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:49:07.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Ever Newer Ways to Mean: Authoring Pedagogical Change in Secondary Subject-Area Classrooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Cynthia L. Greenleaf
Affiliation:
Strategic Literacy Initiative/WestEd
Mira-Lisa Katz
Affiliation:
Sonoma State University
Arnetha F. Ball
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Sarah Warshauer Freedman
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

The semantic structure of an internally persuasive discourse is not finite, it is open; in each of the new contexts that dialogize it, this discourse is able to reveal ever newer ways to mean.

—(Bakhtin, 1981, p. 346)

The texts of educational research are replete with descriptions of teachers resistant to the pedagogical changes that others prescribe or mandate (Pajares, 1991; cf. Richardson, 1990). In the large body of research devoted to educational reform, teachers are often depicted – positioned – as unable, unwilling, unknowing, and/or unskilled. In this chapter, we aim to describe, instead, a professional learning environment in which teachers, who are seen as knowledgeable experts in their disciplines, are invited to engage in collaborative inquiry and to adaptively design classroom innovation. We describe the discourses that shape this learning environment and show how teachers, as a result of their collaborative experiences and exchanges, take up social and dialogical tools for imagining and authoring new pedagogical selves. We illustrate how, in the process, teachers begin to offer new possibilities for their diverse, urban students – themselves often positioned as unable, unwilling, unknowing, and/or unskilled – to enact new literate identities and practices in the classroom.

Bakhtin's key theoretical constructs of “dialogism” and “authoring” provide us with a theoretical framework for reflecting on the power and potential of inquiry-based professional development for teachers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvermann, D. E., & Moore, D. W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 951–83). New York: Longman
Applebee, A. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (Trans. C. Emerson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press
Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing process problems (pp. 134–65). New York: Guilford Press
Bissex, G. L. (1994). Teacher research: Seeing what we are doing. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Teachers thinking, teachers knowing: Reflections on literacy and language education (pp. 88–104). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Buchanan, J. (1994). Teacher as learner: Working in a community of teachers. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Teachers thinking, teachers knowing: Reflections on literacy and language education (pp. 39–52). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Carroll, D., & Carini, P. (1991). Tapping teachers' knowledge. In V. Perrone (Ed.), Expanding student assessment (pp. 40–6). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1992). Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62(4), 447–74Google Scholar
Conley, M. W., & Warren, S. (1988). The development of teacher explanations during content reading lessons. In J. E. Readence & R. S. Baldwin (Eds.), Dialogues in literacy research (pp. 259–66). Chicago: National Reading Conference
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). The powers of Literacy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
Courts, P. L. (1997). Multicultural literacies: Dialect, discourse, and diversity. New York: Peter Lang
Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press
Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(10), 4–29Google Scholar
Florio-Ruane, S. (1990). Creating your own case studies: A guide for early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 17(1), 29–41Google Scholar
Freedman, S., Simons, E., Kalnin, J., & Casareno, A., & M-CLASS Teams (Eds.) (1999). Inside city schools: Investigating literacy in multicultural classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press
Freedman, S. W., Flower, L., Hull, G., & Hayes, J. R. (1995). Ten years of research: Achievements of the National Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy. Technical Report No. 1-C. Berkeley, CA: National Center for the Study of Writing
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: The Falmer Press
Gee, J. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey
Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: The Falmer Press
Goswami, D., & Stillman, P. (Eds.) (1987). Reclaiming the classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton-Cook
Graves, D. (1990). Discover your own literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Greenleaf, C., Hull, G., & Reilly, B. (1994). Learning from our diverse students: Helping teachers rethink problematic teaching and learning situations. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(5), 521–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenleaf, C., Schoenbach, R., Cziko, C., & Mueller, F. (2001). Apprenticing adolescents to academic literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 71(1), 79–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P. (1990). The MA king of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. New York: Routledge
Hull, G. A., & Rose, M. (1989). Rethinking remediation: Toward a social-cognitive understanding of problematic reading and writing. Written Communication, 8, 139–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, G., Rose, M., Fraser, K. L., & Castellano, M. (1991). Remediation as social construct: Perspectives from an analysis of classroom discourse. College Composition and Communication, 42(3), 299–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konopak, B. C., Wilson, E. K., & Readence, J. E. (1994). Examining teachers' beliefs, decisions, and practices about content-area reading in secondary social studies. In C. Kinze, J. A. Peter, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice (pp. 127–36). Chicago: National Reading Conference
Langer, J. (1995). Envisioning literature. New York: Teachers College Press
Lee, C. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Moje, E. B., Dillon, D. R., & O'Brien, D. G. (2000). Re-examining the roles of the learner, the text, and the context in secondary literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 165–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moje, E. B., & Wade, S. E. (1997). What case discussions reveal about teacher thinking. Teaching & Teacher Education, 13(7), 691–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morson, G. S., & Emerson, G. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press
O'Brien, D. G. (1988). Secondary preservice teachers' resistance to content reading instruction: A proposal for a broader rationale. In J. E. Readence & R. S. Baldwin (Eds.), Dialogues in literacy research (pp. 237–43). Chicago: National Reading Conference
Pajares, M. F. (1991). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, S. (1974). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In C. Cazden, V. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370–94). New York: Teachers College Press
Rabinowitz, P. J. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Rabinowitz, P. J., & Smith, M. (1998). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. New York: Teachers College Press
Raphael, T. (1982). Question-answering strategies for children. The Reading Teacher, 36, 186–90Google Scholar
Rex, L., & McEachen, D. (1999). ‘If anything is odd, inappropriate, confusing, or boring, it's probably important’: The emergence of inclusive academic literacy through English classroom discussion practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 65–129Google Scholar
Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19, 10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risko, V. J., McAllister, D., & Bigenho, F. (1993). Value-added benefits for reforming remedial reading methodology course with videodisc and hypercard technology. In T. Rasinski & N. Padak (Eds.), Inquiries in literacy learning and instruction (pp. 179–89). Harrisonburg, VA: College Reading Association
Risko, V. J., Peter, J. J., & McAllister, D. (1996). Conceptual changes: Preservice teachers' pathways to providing literacy instruction. In E. G. Sturtevant & W. M. Linek (Eds.), Growing literacy: Eighteenth yearbook of the College Reading Association (pp. 104–19). Harrisonburg, VA: College Reading Association
Rose, M. (1989). Lives on the boundary. New York: Penguin Books
Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education. New York: Teachers College Press
Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., Cziko, C., & Hurwitz, L. (1999). Reading for understanding: A guide to improving reading in middle and high school classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what's it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 133–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. A. (1996). The National Writing Project after 22 years. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(10), 21–31Google Scholar
Stodolsky, S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman
Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 457–521). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×