Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
- PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
- Contents
- SOME INTRODUCTORY DATES
- INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER
- I THE PROBABILITIES FROM KNOWN CHARACTER AND EDUCATION OF THE WRITER OF THE PLAYS
- II THE INTERNAL EVIDENCE OF SHAKSPERE'S PLAYS AND BACON'S BOOKS
- III SPECIAL ILLUSTRATION
- IV WHETHER WERE THE POEMS AND PLAYS CLAIMED BY SHAKSPERE OR BACON?
- V EXTERNAL EVIDENCE
- VI THE HISTORY OF THE HERESY
- VII BACON'S CIPHERS
- APPENDIX
- INDEX
- PRESS NOTICES
PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2011
- Frontmatter
- PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION
- PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION
- Contents
- SOME INTRODUCTORY DATES
- INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER
- I THE PROBABILITIES FROM KNOWN CHARACTER AND EDUCATION OF THE WRITER OF THE PLAYS
- II THE INTERNAL EVIDENCE OF SHAKSPERE'S PLAYS AND BACON'S BOOKS
- III SPECIAL ILLUSTRATION
- IV WHETHER WERE THE POEMS AND PLAYS CLAIMED BY SHAKSPERE OR BACON?
- V EXTERNAL EVIDENCE
- VI THE HISTORY OF THE HERESY
- VII BACON'S CIPHERS
- APPENDIX
- INDEX
- PRESS NOTICES
Summary
The great Shaksperean scholars have considered it beneath their dignity to answer the assertions of the Baconians. “Silence” may be “golden” in regard to the character of the living, but in defence of the character of the dead, I think that speech is golden when it answers speech; and proof, when it contests proof. Hence I thought it not in vain to put together the main results of the studies I had undertaken on my own account during the past two years. These may help to turn the balance of opinion in some wavering minds, or to aid some warm Shakspereans (that are too busy to go through original work on their own account) to reconsider the subject justly, and “give a reason for the faith that is in them.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Bacon–Shakspere Question Answered , pp. v - viPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010First published in: 1889