Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism
- 1 Introduction
- PART I THE SELF: CONCEPTIONS OF THE AUTONOMOUS SELF
- 2 Decentralizing Autonomy: Five Faces of Selfhood
- 3 The Self as Narrator
- 4 Autonomy and Self-Identity
- PART II THE INTERPERSONAL: PERSONAL AUTHORITY AND INTERPERSONAL RECOGNITION
- PART III THE SOCIAL: PUBLIC POLICY AND LIBERAL PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE POLITICAL: LIBERALISM, LEGITIMACY, AND PUBLIC REASON
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - The Self as Narrator
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism
- 1 Introduction
- PART I THE SELF: CONCEPTIONS OF THE AUTONOMOUS SELF
- 2 Decentralizing Autonomy: Five Faces of Selfhood
- 3 The Self as Narrator
- 4 Autonomy and Self-Identity
- PART II THE INTERPERSONAL: PERSONAL AUTHORITY AND INTERPERSONAL RECOGNITION
- PART III THE SOCIAL: PUBLIC POLICY AND LIBERAL PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE POLITICAL: LIBERALISM, LEGITIMACY, AND PUBLIC REASON
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Many philosophers have thought that human autonomy includes, or perhaps even consists in, a capacity for self-constitution – a capacity, that is, to define or invent or create oneself. Unfortunately, self-constitution sounds not just magical but paradoxical, as if the rabbit could go solo and pull himself out of the hat. Suspicions about the very idea of this trick have sometimes been allayed by appeal to the political analogy implicit in the term “self-constitution”: a person is claimed to constitute himself in the same way as a polity does, by writing, ratifying, and revising articles of constitution. But a polity is constituted, in the first instance, by its constituent persons, who are constituted antecedently to it; and suspicions therefore remain about the idea of self-constitution at the level of the individual person.
One philosopher has tried to save personal self-constitution from suspicions of paradox by freely admitting that it is a trick. A real rabbit can't pull himself out of a hat, according to this philosopher, but an illusory rabbit can appear to do so: the secret of the trick is that the rabbit isn't real. We ask, “But if the rabbit isn't real – and there's no magician, either – then who is performing the trick?” He replies, “Why, of course: the hat.” A rabbit can't pull himself out of a hat, but a hat can make it appear that a rabbit is pulling himself out of it.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Autonomy and the Challenges to LiberalismNew Essays, pp. 56 - 76Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
- 23
- Cited by