References

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491191.014

Ackermann, A., “Why Europe and America Don't See Eye to Eye,” International Politics 40 (March 2003), 121–136.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aliboni, R., “Il dibattito sulla politica europea di sicurezza e difesa” [“The Debate on European Policy on Security and Defense”], in Istituto Affari Internazionali, L'Italia nella politica internazionale, 1993 (Rome: SIPI, 1993), 142–154.Google Scholar

Ambrose, Stephen E., Eisenhower: The President (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984).Google Scholar

American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties, “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties,” American Political Science Review 44:3 (1950), part 2, supplement.

Andrews, D., “The United States and Its Atlantic Partners: The Evolution of American Grand Strategy,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17:3 (October 2004), 421–436.CrossRef Google Scholar

Art, R. J., A Grand Strategy for America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Ashdown, P., Ashdown Diaries: 1997–1999 (London: Penguin Books, 2001).Google Scholar

Asmus, R., Opening NATO's Door (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Asmus, R.,“Rebuilding the Atlantic Alliance,” Foreign Affairs 82:5 (September–October 2003), 20–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bacevich, A. J., American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of US Diplomacy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Bailes, A. J. K., “NATO's New Response Force,” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:1 (Spring 2003), 25–29.Google Scholar

Balmond, L. (ed.), Les interventions militaires françaises en Afrique [French Military Interventions in Africa] (Paris: Pedone, 1998).Google Scholar

Barany, Z., “Hungary: Appraising a New NATO Member,” Clausewitz-Studien (1998), 3–31.Google Scholar

Barany, Z.,“The Military and Security Legacies of Communism,” in Barany, Z. and Volgyes, I. (eds.), The Legacies of Communism in Eastern Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), 101–117.Google Scholar

Barany, Z.,“An Outpost on the Troubled Periphery,” in Michta, America's New Allies, 74–111.

Becker, J. J., Crises et alternances 1974–2000 (Paris: Le Seuil, 2002).Google Scholar

Bennett, A., Condemned to Repetition? The Rise, Fall, and Reprise of Soviet–Russian Military Interventionism, 1973–1996 (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Bergner, J. T., The New Superpowers: Germany, Japan, the US and the New World Order (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Binder, S. A. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–1996,” American Political Science Review 93:3 (September 1999), 519–533.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blair, T., New Britain: My Vision of a Young Country (London: Fourth Estate, 1996).Google Scholar

Blix, H., Disarming Iraq (London: Bloomsbury, 2004).Google Scholar

Bollmann, Y., Ce que veut l'Allemagne (Paris: Bartillat, 2003).Google Scholar

Bonnet, A., Iraq: le veto français (Paris: Les Dossiers de France Demain, 2003).Google Scholar

Bouton, M. and Page, B. (eds.), Worldviews 2002: American Public Opinion and Foreign Policy (Chicago: Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 2002).Google Scholar

Bouton, M. and Page, B. (eds.),Worldviews 2002: Topline Data from US Public Survey (Chicago: Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, 2002).Google Scholar

Bozo, F., “The Effects of Kosovo and the Danger of Decoupling,” in Howorth, J. and Keeler, J. T. S. (eds.), Defending Europe: The EU, NATO and the Quest for Autonomy (London: Palgrave, 2003), 61–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R., “End of the Affair,” Prospect (May 2003).Google Scholar

Brogi, A., L'Italia e l'egemonia americana nel Mediterraneo [Italy and American Hegemony in the Mediterranean] (Florence: Nuova Italia, 1996).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).CrossRef Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Z., The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership (New York: Basic Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Z.,“The Premature Partnership,” Foreign Affairs 73:2 (March–April 1992), 67–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Z.,“Where Do We Go from Here?” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:3 (Fall 2003), 3–10.Google Scholar

Buchanan, P. J., A Republic, Not An Empire: Reclaiming America's Destiny (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar

Caplan, G., “A Transatlantic Approach to the Middle East Conflict: Do We Have Enough in Common?,” AICGS/DAAD Working Paper Series (Washington, DC: AICGS 2003).

Carter, R. G., “Congress and Post-Cold War US Foreign Policy,” in Scott, J. M. (ed.), After the End: Making US Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World (Durham: Duke University Press, 1998), 108–137.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chalmers, M., “The Atlantic Burden-Sharing Debate: Widening or Fragmenting?,” International Affairs 77:3 (2001), 569–585.CrossRef Google Scholar

Churchill, W., A History of the English-Speaking Peoples (London: Cassell, 1956–8).Google Scholar

Clarke, R. A., Against All Enemies (New York: Free Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Cogan, C., French Negotiating Behavior: Dealing with La Grande Nation (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Cohen, S. and Smouts, M. C., La politique extérieure de Valéry Giscard d'Estaing (Paris: Presses de la FNSP, 1985).Google Scholar

Cointet, J. P., Lachaise, B., Béguec, G. and Mayeur, J. M. (eds.), Un politique: Georges Pompidou (Paris: PUF, 2001).Google Scholar

Coombs, C. A., The Arena of International Finance (New York: Wiley, 1976).Google Scholar

Cooper, R., The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century (London: Atlantic, 2003).Google Scholar

Cooper, R.,The Post-Modern State and the World Order (London: Demos, 1996).Google Scholar

Cornish, P., “The British Military View of European Security 1945–1950,” in Deighton, A. (ed.), Building Post-War Europe: National Decision-Makers and European Institutions, 1948–1963 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995).CrossRef Google Scholar

Cottey, A., Edmunds, T. and Forster, A., “Beyond Prague,” Nato Review 3 (2002), 1–5.Google Scholar

Cremasco, M., “L'Italia e la sicurezza internazionale” [“Italy and International Security”], in Istituto Affari Internazionali, L'Italia nella politica internazionale, 1994 (Roma: SIPI, 1994), 63–79.Google Scholar

Cuche, P., “Iraq: And If France Was Wrong?” [“Irak: et si la France s’était trompée?”], Politique Etrangère 99 (Summer 2003), 409–422.CrossRef Google Scholar

Daalder, I. H., and Lindsay, J. M., America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Daalder, I. and O'Hanlon, M., Winning Ugly: NATO's War to Save Kosovo (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar

D'Alema, M., Kosovo: gli italiani e la guerra [Kosovo: The Italians and the War] (Milan: Mondadori, 1999).Google Scholar

Davis, J. W., “Victims of Success? Post Victory Alliance Politics,” NATO Research Fellowship Final Report (2000), http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/98-DO/davis.pdf.

Gaulle, C., Discours et Messages, vol. IV (Paris: Plon, 1986).Google Scholar

Gaulle, C.,Mémoires d'espoir: le renouveau [Memories of Hope: The Renewal] (Paris: Plon, 1970).Google Scholar

Lacharrière, G., La politique juridique extérieure [Juridical Foreign Policy] (Paris: Economica, 1983).Google Scholar

Marenches, A. and Ockrent, C., Dans le secret des princes (Paris: Stock, 1986), translated into English, with Andelman, D., The Fourth World War: Diplomacy and Espionage in the Age of Terrorism (New York: Morrow, 1992).Google Scholar

Montbrial, T., L'action et le système du monde (Paris: PUF, 2002).Google Scholar

Montbrial, T.,“Franco-American Relations: A Historical-Structural Analysis,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17:3 (October 2004), 451–466.CrossRef Google Scholar

Debré, M., et al. (eds.), Guy Ladreit de Lacharrière et la politique juridique extérieure de la France [Guy Ladreit de Lacharrière and France's Juridical Foreign Policy] (Paris: Masson, 1989).Google Scholar

Del Pero, M., L'alleato scomodo: gli USA e la DC negli anni del centrismo (1948–1955) [The Inconvenient Ally: The USA and the Christian Democrats in the Age of Centrism (1948–1955)] (Rome: Carocci, 2001).Google Scholar

Delafon, G. and Sancton, T., Dear Jacques, Cher Bill (Paris: Plon, 1999).Google Scholar

Delpech, T., “Bagdad: trois leçons pour une crise,” Politique Internationale 100 (Summer 2003).Google Scholar

Denison, A. B., Shades of Multilateralism: US Perspectives on Europe's Role in the War on Terrorism (Bonn: ZEI Discussion Paper No. 106, 2002).Google Scholar

DeSipio, L., Counting on the Latino Vote: Latinos as a New Electorate (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Destler, I. M., “Congress and Foreign Policy at Century's End: Requiem on Cooperation?,” in Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I. (eds.), Congress Reconsidered, 7th edition (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2001), 315–333.Google Scholar

Einheit, Deutsche, Sonderedition aus den Akten des Bundeskanzleramts (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1998).Google Scholar

Di Nolfo, E., “The United States and Italian Communism: World War II to the Cold War” Journal of Italian History 1:1 (1978), 74–94.Google Scholar

Di Nolfo, E.,Vaticano e Stati Uniti: dalle carte di Myron Taylor 1939–1952 [The Vatican and the United States: From the Documents of Myron Taylor 1939–1952] (Milan: F. Angeli, 1978).Google Scholar

Dini, L., Tra casa bianca e botteghe oscure: Fatti e retroscena di una stagione alla Farnesina [Between the White House and the Botteghe Oscure: Behind the Scenes of a Season at the Farnesina] (Milan: Guerini e Associati, 2001).Google Scholar

Dobbins, J., et al., America's Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq MR-1753 RC (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2003).Google Scholar

Duelfer, C., “The Inevitable Failure of Inspections in Iraq,” Arms Control Today, 32:7 (September 2002).Google Scholar

Duke, S., The Burdensharing Debate: A Reassessment (London: Macmillan, 1993).CrossRef Google Scholar

Dunay, P., “Civil–Military Relations in Hungary: No Big Deal,” in Edmunds, T., Forster, A., and Cottey, A. (eds.), Democratic Control of the Military in Postcommunist Europe: Guarding the Guards (London: Palgrave, 2002), 64–87.Google Scholar

Duroselle, J. B., Tout empire périra: une vision historique des relations internationales (Paris: Armand Colin, 1982).Google Scholar

Ehrman, J., The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945–1994 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Epstein, R., “NATO Enlargement and the Spread of Democracy: Evidence and Expectation,” Security Studies 14:1 (Spring 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Farer, T., “Beyond the Charter Frame: Unilateralism or Condominium?,” American Journal of International Law 96:2 (April 2002), 359–364.CrossRef Google Scholar

Featherstone, K. and Ginsberg, R., The United States and the European Union in the 1990s: Partners in Transition (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1993).Google Scholar

Feldman, L. G., “The European Union's Enlargement Project and US–EU Cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Burwell, F. and Daalder, I. H. (eds.), The United States and Europe in the Global Arena (London: Macmillan, 1999), 44–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Forster, A., Edmunds, T. and Cottey, A. (eds.), The Challenge of Military Reform in Postcommunist Europe: Building Professional Armed Forces (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).CrossRef Google Scholar

Franck, T., Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRef Google Scholar

Franck, T.,“Terrorism and the Right of Self-Defense,” American Journal of International Law 95 (October 2001), 839–843.CrossRef Google Scholar

Freedman, L. and Karsh, E., The Gulf Conflict, 1990–1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Frum, D., The Right Man (New York: Random House, 2003).Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F., “Has History Restarted Since September 11?,” John Bonython Lecture at the Centre for Independent Studies, Melbourne, Australia, August 8, 2002.

Gaddis, L., “History, Grand Strategy, and NATO Enlargement,” Survival 40:1 (1998), 145–151.Google Scholar

Gehrz, C. and Trachtenberg, M., “America, Europe, and German Rearmament, August–September 1950,” in Trachtenberg, M. (ed.), Between Empire and Alliance (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 1–32.Google Scholar

Gimbel, J., The American Occupation of Germany (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Giscard d'Estaing, V., Le pouvoir et la vie (Paris: Cie 12, 1991).Google Scholar

Glennon, M. J., “The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence, and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 25 (Spring 2002), 539–558.Google Scholar

Glennon, M. J.,Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionism After Kosovo (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).CrossRef Google Scholar

Gnesotto, N., La puissance et l'Europe (Paris: Presses de la FNSP, 1998).Google Scholar

Golden, J. R., NATO Burden-Sharing: Risks and Opportunities (Washington, DC: Praeger, Washington Papers 96, 1983).Google Scholar

Goldgeier, J., Not Whether But When: The US Decision to Enlarge NATO (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Gordon, P. H., and Shapiro, J., Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq (New York: McGraw-Hill/Brookings Institution Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Gorka, S., “Hungarian Military Reform and Peacekeeping Effort,” NATO Review (November 1995), 26–29.Google Scholar

Grant, L., “America's Liberal Jews,” Prospect 84 (March 2003), 52–54.Google Scholar

Granville, J., “The Many Paradoxes of NATO Enlargement,” Current History 98 (1999), 165–170.Google Scholar

Grayson, G., Strange Bedfellows: NATO Marches East (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999).Google Scholar

Grosser, A., The Western Alliance (London: Macmillan, 1980).Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, A. and Luong, Jones P., “Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-Communism,” Politics and Society 30:4 (2002), 529–554.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guérot, U., Kaiser, K., Koopmann, M., Lefebvre, M., de Montbrial, T., Defarges, P. M. and Stark, H., “Deutschland, Frankreich und Europa: Perspektiven” [Germany, France, and Europe: Perspectives], DGAP-Analyse No. 21 (German Council on Foreign Relations and the French Institute of Foreign Relations, January 2003).

Gutierrez, B., “Defense Reform in Central Europe and the Challenges of NATO Membership: The Case of Hungary,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego (2002).

Haftendorn, H., Deutsche Aussenpolitik zwischen Selbstbeschränkung und Selbstbehauptung (Munich: DVA, 2001).Google Scholar

Haftendorn, H.,One Year After 9/11: A Critical Appraisal of German–American Relations, Thyssen German American Dialogue Seminar Series, AICGS, 2002, http://www.aicgs.org/publications/PDF/haftendom.pdf.

Hamilton, D. S., German–American Relations and the Campaign Against Terrorism (Washington, DC: AICGS, 2002).Google Scholar

Harnisch, S. and Maull, H. W. (eds.), Germany as a Civilian Power? The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Haselkorn, A., The Continuing Storm: Iraq, Poisonous Weapons, and Deterrence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hassner, P., “Friendly Questions to America the Powerful,” In the National Interest 1:2 (Fall 2002).Google Scholar

Hassner, P.,“The United States: The Empire of Force or the Force of Empire?” (Paris: Chaillot Paper 54, European Union Institute for Security Studies, September 2002).

Hassner, P. and Vaïsse, J., Washington et le monde: dilemmes d'une superpuissance (Paris: CERI/Autrement, 2003).Google Scholar

Hendrickson, R., “Nato's Visegrad Allies: The First Test in Kosovo,” Journal of Slavic Military Studies 13:2 (2000), 25–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Henke, K. D., Die amerikanische Besetzung Deutschlands [The American Occupation of Germany] (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1995).Google Scholar

Henkin, L., How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd edition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Henrikson, A., “Why the United States and Europe See the World Differently: An Atlanticist's Rejoinder to the Kagan Thesis,” European Union Studies Association Newsletter 16:3 (2003), 1–10.Google Scholar

Holsti, O. R., “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy,” in Lieber, R. J. (ed.), Eagle Rules? Foreign Policy and American Primacy in the Twenty-First Century (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002), 16–46.Google Scholar

Holsti, O. R.,“Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy After the Cold War,” in Scott, J. M. (ed.), After the End: Making US Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World (Durham: Duke University Press, 1998), 138–169.CrossRef Google Scholar

Holsti, O. R. and Rosenau, J. N., “Liberals, Populists, Libertarians, and Conservatives: The Link Between Domestic and International Affairs,” International Political Science Review 17:1 (1996), 29–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Holsti, O. R. and Rosenau, J. N.,“The Political Foundations of Elites’ Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs,” in Wittkopf, E. R. and McCormick, J. M. (eds.), The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999), 33–50.Google Scholar

Horsefield, J. K. (ed.), The International Monetary Fund, 1945–1965, vol. III, Documents (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 1969).Google Scholar

Howorth, J., “Foreign and Defence Policy Cooperation: European and American Perspectives,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 13–27.

Howorth, J.,“France, Britain and the Euro-Atlantic Crisis,” Survival 45:4 (Winter 2003/4), 173–192.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. J., After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. J.,America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. J.,“The Political Foundations of Atlantic Order,” in Gardner, H. and Stefanova, R. (eds.), The New Transatlantic Agenda: Facing the Challenges of Global Governance (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2001), 17–29.Google Scholar

Ilari, V., “La politica militare italiana” [“Italian Military Policy”], in Istituto Affari Internazionali, L'Italia nella politica internazionale, 1993 (Roma: SIPI, 1993), 203–229.Google Scholar

Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Akten zur Auswärtigen Politik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1971 (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2002), vol. III.

Jacobson, G. C., “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection,” in Bond, J. R. and Fleisher, R. (eds.), Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2000), 9–30.Google Scholar

Jacoby, W., The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRef Google Scholar

Jean, C., “La nostra sicurezza nel mondo balcanizzato” [“Our Security in a Balkanized World”], Limes 4 (1994), 201–212.Google Scholar

Jervis, R., “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30:2 (1978), 167–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Joffe, J., “Who's Afraid of Mr. Big?,” The National Interest 64 (Summer 2001), 43–52.Google Scholar

Jones, C., “Nato Enlargement: Brussels as the Heir of Moscow,” Problems of Post-Communism 45:4 (1998), 44–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, N., The Control Freaks (London: Politico's, 2001).Google Scholar

Jones-Correa, M., “Latinos and Latin America: A Unified Agenda?,” in Ambrosio, T. (ed.), Ethnic Identity Groups and US Foreign Policy (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002), 115–130.Google Scholar

Kagan, R., “America's Crisis of Legitimacy,” Foreign Affairs (March–April 2004), 65–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kagan, R.,Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (New York: Knopf, 2003).Google Scholar

Kagan, R.,“Power and Weakness,” Policy Review 113 (June–July 2002, http://www.Policyreview.org/JUNO2/Kagan.html).Google Scholar

Kahler, M., “The United States and Western Europe: The Diplomatic Consequences of Mr. Reagan,” in Oye, K. A., Lieber, R. J., and Rothchild, D. (eds.), Eagle Resurgent? The Reagan Era in American Foreign Policy (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1987), 297–333.Google Scholar

Kampfner, J., Blair's Wars (London: Free Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Kampfner, J. and Riddell, P., “Blair's Five Wars,” Prospect 91 (October 2003), 40–43.Google Scholar

Kaplan, L. F., and Kristol, W., The War over Iraq: Saddam's Tyranny and America's Mission (San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Katzenstein, P., “Same War – Different Views: Germany, Japan, and Counter-terrorism,” International Organization 57 (Fall 2003), 731–760.CrossRef Google Scholar

Katzenstein P.,“Uniting Germany in an Integrating Europe,” in Katzenstein, P. (ed.), Tamed Power: Germany in Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997), 1–48.Google Scholar

Kay, S., NATO and the Future of European Security (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law, 2nd edition (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966).Google Scholar

Kennedy, C. and Bouton, M., “The Real Trans-Atlantic Gap,” Foreign Policy 133 (November–December 2002), 66–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kerski, B., “Zwischen Desinteresse und Misstrauen: zur Krise in den deutsch– polnischen Beziehungen,” Internationale Politik 59:4 (2004), 31–40.Google Scholar

Khalizad, Z., From Containment to Global Leadership? America and the World After the Cold War (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 1995).Google Scholar

King, D. C., “The Polarization of American Parties and the Mistrust of Government,” in Nye, J. S. Jr., Zelikow, P. D., and King, D. C. (eds.), Why People Don't Trust Government (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997), 155–178.Google Scholar

Kissinger, H., Diplomacy (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994).Google Scholar

Kissinger, H.,Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the Twenty-First Century (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001).Google Scholar

Kissinger, H.,“What Kind of Atlantic Partnership?,” Atlantic Community Quarterly 7 (1969), 18–38.Google Scholar

Kitfield, J., “Damage Control,” National Journal, NATO Enlargement Daily Briefs, Op-Eds (July 18, 2003).Google Scholar

Klau, T., “France and Germany: A Re-Marriage of Convenience,” US–France Analysis Series, Brookings Institution (January 2003, http://www.brookings.edu/usfrance/analysis/index.html).

Kornelius, S., “Joschka Fischer's Long Journey,” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:3 (Fall 2003), 49–54.Google Scholar

Krasno, J. and Sutterlin, J., The United Nations and Iraq: Defanging the Viper (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003).Google Scholar

Krauthammer, C., “The Unipolar Moment Revisited,” The National Interest 70 (Winter 2002–3), 5–17.Google Scholar

Krzeminski, A., “Poland's Home Is Europe,” Transatlantic Internationale Politik 4:3 (Fall 2003), 65–68.Google Scholar

Kull, S., Americans on Terrorism: Two Years After 9/11, Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Knowledge Networks (September 9, 2003).

Kull, S.,Seeking a New Balance: A Study of American and European Public Attitudes on Transatlantic Issues (Washington, DC: Program on International Policy Attitudes, Center for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland, June 26, 1998).Google Scholar

Kull, S. and Destler, I. M., Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Kupchan, C. A., The End of the American Era: US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Knopf, 2002).Google Scholar

Kupchan, C. A.,“The End of the West,” Atlantic Monthly 290:4 (November 2002), 42–44.Google Scholar

Kupchan, C. A.,“The Rise of Europe, America's Changing Internationalism, and the End of US Primacy,” Political Science Quarterly 118:2 (Summer 2003), 205–231.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lagorio, L., L'ultima sfida: gli euromissili [The Ultimate Challenge: Euromissiles] (Florence: Loggia de’ Lanzi, 1998).Google Scholar

Lambert, R., “Misunderstanding Each Other,” Foreign Affairs 82:2 (March–April 2003), 62–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Layne, C., “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Arise,” International Security 17:4 (Spring 1993), 5–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ledeen, M. and Lewis, W., Débâcle: l’échec américain en Iran (Paris: Albin Michel, 1981).Google Scholar

Lerman, A., “Sense on Antisemitism,” Prospect 77 (August 2002), 34–39.Google Scholar

Lieven, A., “Speaking Up,” Prospect 86 (May 2003), 24–27.Google Scholar

Lind, M., “The Israel Lobby,” Prospect 73 (April 2002), 22–29.Google Scholar

Lind, M.,Made in Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern Takeover of American Politics (New York: Basic Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Lindley-French, J., Terms of Engagement: The Paradox of American Power and the Transatlantic Dilemma Post-11 September (Paris: Chaillot Papers, European Union Institute for Security Studies, May 2002).Google Scholar

Lindley-French, J.,“The Ties That Bind,” NATO Review (Autumn 2003, http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2003/issue 3/english/art 2.html).Google Scholar

Lindsay, J. M., “The New Apathy: How an Uninterested Public Is Reshaping Foreign Policy,” Foreign Affairs 79:5 (September–October 2000), 2–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lipset, S. M., American Exceptionalism (New York: W. W. Norton, 1996).Google Scholar

Little, R. and Wickham-Jones, M., New Labour's Foreign Policy: A New Moral Crusade? (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Lucarelli, S., Europe and the Breakup of Yugoslavia: A Political Failure in Search of a Scholarly Explanation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000).Google Scholar

Lundestad, G., The American “Empire” (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Lundestad, G.,“Empire” by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Lundestad, G.,“‘Empire by Invitation’ in the American Century,” Diplomatic History 23:2 (Spring 1999), 189–217.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lundestad, G.,“Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of Peace Research 23:3 (1986), 263–277.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lundestad, G.,The United States and Western Europe Since 1945: From “Empire” by Invitation to Transatlantic Drift (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Luoma-aho, M., “‘Arm’ Versus ‘Pillar’: The Politics of Metaphors of the Western European Union at the 1990–1991 Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union,” Journal of European Public Policy 11:1 (February 2004), 106–127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maelstaf, G., Que faire de l'Allemagne? Les responsables français, le statut international de l'Allemagne et le problème de l'unité allemande (1945–1955) (Paris: Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, 1999).Google Scholar

Marcellin, R., L'importune vérité (Paris: Plon, 1978).Google Scholar

Mausbach, W., “European Perspectives on the War in Vietnam,” German Historical Institute Bulletin 30 (2002), 71–86.Google Scholar

Meacham, J., Franklin and Winston: An Intimate Portrait of an Epic Friendship (New York: Random House, 2003).Google Scholar

Mead, W. R., Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (New York: Century Foundation, 2002).Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, J., “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War,” International Security 15:1 (July–August 1990), 5–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Menon, A. and Lipkin, J., European Attitudes Towards Transatlantic Relations, 2000–2003: An Analytical Survey (Birmingham: European Research Institute, 2003).Google Scholar

Menotti, R., “Italy and NATO: The Unsinkable Carrier and the Mediterranean,” What Italy Stands For – Limes (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1997), 15–29.Google Scholar

Michta, A. (ed.), America's New Allies: Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in NATO (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Michta, A. (ed.),“Poland: A Linchpin of Regional Security,” in Michta, America's New Allies, 40–73.

Michta, A. (ed.),Red Eagle: The Army in Polish Politics, 1944–1988 (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Michta, A. (ed.),The Soldier-Citizen: The Politics of the Polish Army After Communism (London: Macmillan, 1997).CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, J. E., The United States and Italy, 1940–1950: The Politics and Diplomacy of Stabilization (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A., “Striking a New Transatlantic Bargain,” Foreign Affairs 82:4 (July–August 2003), 74–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H., Politics Among Nations, 3rd edition (New York: Knopf, 1961).Google Scholar

NATO, NATO Handbook (Brussels: NATO Office of Information and Press, 2001).

Nincic, M., Rose, R. and Gorski, G., “The Social Foundations of Adjustment,” in Trubowitz, P., Goldman, E. O., and Rhodes, E. (eds.), The Politics of Strategic Adjustment: Ideas, Institutions, and Interests (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 176–209.Google Scholar

Ninkovich, F., “The United States, NATO, and the Lessons of History,” in Kotlowski, D. J. (ed.), The European Union: From Jean Monnet to the Euro (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2000), 203–212.Google Scholar

Nordlinger, E., Isolationism Reconfigured: American Foreign Policy for a New Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Nuti, L., “Dall'operazione Deep Rock all'operazione Pot Pie: una storia documentata dei missili SM 78 Jupiter in Italia” [“From Operation Deep Rock to Operation Pot Pie: A Documentary History of SM 78 Jupiter Missiles in Italy”], Storia delle Relazioni Internazionali 11/12:1 (1996–7) and 2 (1996–7), 95–138 and 105–149.Google Scholar

Nuti, L.,“Italy and the Battle of the Euromissiles,” in Njolstad, O. (ed.), The Last Decade of the Cold War: From Conflict Escalation to Conflict Transformation (London: Frank Cass, 2004), 332–359.Google Scholar

Nye, J. S. Jr., The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go It Alone (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Olson, M. and Zeckhauser, R., “An Economic Theory of Alliances,” Review of Economics and Statistics 48 (1966), 266–279.CrossRef Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L., “The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method,” American Journal of International Law 2:2 (April 1908), 313–356.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pells, R., Not Like Us: How Europeans Have Loved, Hated and Transformed American Culture Since World War II (New York: Basic Books, 1997).Google Scholar

Perthes, V., “The Advantages of Complementarity: The Middle East Peace Process,” in Gardner, H. and Stefanova, R. (eds.), The New Transatlantic Agenda: Facing the Challenges of Global Governance (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2001), 103–121.Google Scholar

Peterson J., “The US and Europe in the Balkans,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 85–98.

Peterson, J. and Green Cowles, M., “Clinton, Europe and Economic Diplomacy: What Makes the EU Different?,” Governance 11:3 (July 1998), 251–271.CrossRef Google Scholar

Peterson, J. and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the Twenty-First Century (London and New York: Routledge, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, The 2004 Political Land-scape: Evenly Divided and Increasingly Polarized (November 5, 2003, http://people-press.org).

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press,“America's Image Further Erodes, Europeans Want Weaker Ties” (March 18, 2003, http://people-press.org).

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press,Views of a Changing World (June 2003, http://people-press.org).

Philippi, N., “Civilian Power and War: The German Debate About Out-of-Area Operations 1990–1999,” in Harnisch and Maull, Germany as a Civilian Power?, 49–67.

Poggiolini, I., “Italian Revisionism After World War II: Status and Security Problems, 1947–1957,” in Ahmann, R. (ed.), The Quest for Stability: Problems of Western European Security 1918–1957 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 327–359.Google Scholar

Pollack, K., “Spies, Lies, and Weapons: What Went Wrong,” Atlantic Monthly January–February 2004, 78–92.Google Scholar

Pollack, K.,The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq (New York: Random House, 2002).Google Scholar

Pollack, M., “Unilateral Europe, Multilateral America?,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 115–127.

Pollack, M. and Shaffer, G. (eds.), Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001).Google Scholar

Pond, E., Friendly Fire: The Near Death of the Transatlantic Alliance (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Posen, B. R. and Ross, A. L., “Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy,” International Security 21:3 (Winter 1996), 5–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Program on International Policy Attitudes, Americans on Globalization (Washington, DC: Center for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland, March 28, 2000).

Quinlan, J. and Chandler, M., “The US Trade Deficit: A Dangerous Obsession,” Foreign Affairs 80:3 (May–June 2001), 87–97.CrossRef Google Scholar

Revel, J. F., L'obsession anti-américaine: son fonctionnement, ses causes, ses inconséquences [The Anti-American Obsession: Its Function, Its Causes, Its Inconsistencies] (Paris: Plon, 2002).Google Scholar

Rice, C., “Promoting the National Interest,” Foreign Affairs 79:1 (January–February 2000), 45–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riddell, P., Hug Them Close: Blair, Clinton and the Special Relationship (London: Politico's, 2003).Google Scholar

Risse, T., Beyond Iraq: Challenges to the Transatlantic Security Community, AICGS/German–American Dialogue Working Paper Series (Washington, DC: AICGS 2003).Google Scholar

Risse, T.,“Constructivism and International Institutions: Toward Conversations Across Paradigms,” in Katznelson, I. and Milner, H. V. (eds.), Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002), 597–629.Google Scholar

Robin, G., “Sens et enjeu de la guerre d'Iraq,” Géopolitique 82 (April–June 2003), 3–10.Google Scholar

Rohde, D. W., “Partisanship, Leadership, and Congressional Assertiveness in Foreign and Defense Policy,” in Deese, D. (ed.), The New Politics of American Foreign Policy (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993), 76–101.Google Scholar

Roosevelt, F., Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 volume (New York: Macmillan, 1941).Google Scholar

Ruggie, J., “Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36 (1982), 379–415.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruggie, J.,“The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy,” International Security 21:4 (Spring 1997), 89–125.Google Scholar

Sacco, G., “Tra Europa e mare aperto: un'agenda per il nostro governo” [“Between Europe and the Deep Blue Sea: An Agenda for Our Government”], Limes 5 (2002), 75–86.Google Scholar

Schelling Study Group Report, “Report on Strategic Developments over the Next Decade for the Inter-Agency Panel,” National Security Files, Box 376, John F. Kennedy Library, Boston (October 1962).

Schlesinger, A. Jr., “Eyeless in Iraq,” New York Review of Books (October 23, 2003), 24–27.Google Scholar

Schwartz, T. A., Lyndon Johnson and Europe: In the Shadow of Vietnam (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Scott, F. and Osman, A., “Identity, African-Americans, and US Foreign Policy: Differing Reactions to South African Apartheid and the Rwandan Genocide,” in Ambrosio, T. (ed.), Ethnic Identity Groups and US Foreign Policy (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002), 71–91.Google Scholar

Seldon, A., Major: A Political Life (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1997).Google Scholar

Silj, A. (ed.), L'alleato scomodo. I rapporti tra Roma e Washington nel Mediterraneo: Sigonella e Gheddafi [The Inconvenient Ally. Relations Between Rome and Washington in the Mediterranean: Sigonella and Gaddafi] (Milan: Corbaccio, 1998).Google Scholar

Simma, B. (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 2 vols., 2nd edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Simon, J., “Partnership for Peace (PFP): After the Washington Summit and Kosovo,” Strategic Forum 167 (1999), 1–5.Google Scholar

Simon, J.,Poland and NATO: A Study in Civil–Military Relations (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).Google Scholar

SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute), SIPRI Yearbook: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security (Stockholm: SIPRI, 2002).

Skidelsky, R., “Imbalance of Power,” Foreign Policy 129 (March–April 2002), 46–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, T., Foreign Attachments: The Power of Ethnic Groups in the Making of American Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Soutou, G. H., L'alliance incertaine: les rapports politico-stratégiques franco- allemands, 1954–1996 (Paris: Fayard, 1996).Google Scholar

Soutou, G. H.,“De Gaulle's France and the Soviet Union from Conflict to Détente,” in Loth, W. (ed.), Europe, Cold War and Coexistence, 1953–1965 (London: Frank Cass, 2003), 173–189.Google Scholar

Soutou, G. H.,“France, Nations and Empires from the Nineteenth Century to the Present Day: Between Jacobin Tradition, European Balance of Power and European Integration,” in Cavanna, H. (ed.), Governance, Globalization and the European Union: Which Europe for Tomorrow? (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2002), 69–86.Google Scholar

Soutou, G. H.,“Georges Pompidou and US–European Relations,” in Trachtenberg, M. (ed.), Between Empire and Alliance: America and Europe During the Cold War (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), 157–200.Google Scholar

Soutou, G. H.,“President Pompidou, the Ostpolitik and the Strategy of Détente,” unpublished typescript.

Stephens, P., Tony Blair: The Making of a World Leader (New York: Viking, 2004).Google Scholar

Stone, J., Aggression and World Order: A Critique of United Nations Theories of Aggression (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Stothard, P., Thirty Days: An Inside Account of Tony Blair at War (New York: Harper Collins, 2003).Google Scholar

Stürmer, M., Die Kunst des Gleichgewichts: Europa in einer Welt ohne Mitte (Berlin: Propyläen, 2001).Google Scholar

Szabo, S., Parting Ways: The Crisis in German–American Relations (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Szayna, T., “A Small Contributor or a ‘Free Rider?,’ ” in Michta, America's New Allies, 112–148.

Szayna, T. and Larrabee, F. S., East European Military Reform After the Cold War: Implications for the United States (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 1995).Google Scholar

Takle, M., “Towards a Normalisation of German Security and Defence Policy: German Participation in International Military Operations,” ARENA Working Papers 02:10 (2002, http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp02_10.html).Google Scholar

Tardy, T., La France et la gestion des conflits yougoslaves (1991–1995): Enjeux et leçons d'une opération de maintien de la paix de l'ONU [France and the Management of the Yugoslav Conflicts (1991–1995): States and Lessons from a UN Operation to Maintain the Peace] (Brussels: Bruylant, 1999).Google Scholar

Taylor, B., “Russia's Passive Army: Rethinking Military Coups,” Comparative Political Studies 34:8 (2001), 924–952.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thatcher, M., The Downing Street Years (London: Harper Collins, 1993).Google Scholar

Thomas, H., The Suez Affair (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970).Google Scholar

Timmerman, K., The French Betrayal of America (New York: Crown Forum, 2004).Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, M., “The Bush Strategy in Historical Perspective,” to be published in Wirtz, James J. and Larsen, Jeffrey A. (eds), Nuclear Transformation: The New US Nuclear Doctrine (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, M.,A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, M.,History and Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, M.,“The Question of Realism: An Historian's View,” Security Studies 13:1 (Fall 2003), 156–194.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, M.,“Waltzing to Armageddon?,” The National Interest (Fall 2002), 144–152.Google Scholar

Trubowitz, P., Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Ulrich, M. P., “Developing Mature National Security Systems in Postcommunist States: The Czech Republic and Slovakia,” Armed Forces and Society 28:3 (2002), 403–425.CrossRef Google Scholar

United Kingdom, Foreign Office, A Commentary on the Charter of the United Nations, Cmd. 6666 of 1945 (London: HMSO, 1945).

Vachudová, M., “The Atlantic Alliance and the Kosovo Crisis: The Impact of Expansion and the Behavior of New Allies,” in Martin, P. and Brawley, M. (eds.), Alliance Politics, Kosovo, and NATO's War: Allied Force or Forced Allies? (New York: St. Martin's, 2001), 201–220.Google Scholar

Eekelen, W. F., Debating European Security, 1948–1998 (The Hague: SDU Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar

Vedrine, H. and Moïsi, D., France in an Age of Globalization, translated by P. H. Gordon (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Villepin, D., Un autre monde (Paris: L'Herne, 2003).Google Scholar

Villepin, D.,“Diplomatie et action, entretien avec Dominique de Villepin,” Supplement to Politique Internationale, 102 (Winter 2003–4), 5–62.Google Scholar

Vlachová, M., “Professionalisation of the Army of the Czech Republic,” in Forster, Edmunds, and Cottey, The Challenge of Military Reform in Postcommunist Europe, 34–48.

Wallace, W. and Musu, C., “The Focus of Discord? The Middle East in US Strategy and European Aspirations,” in Peterson and Pollack, Europe, America, Bush, 99–114.

Wallander, C. A., “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War,” International Organization 54:4 (2000), 705–735.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walt, S. M., The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N., “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security 18:2 (Autumn 1993), 44–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N.,“Structural Realism After the Cold War,” International Security 25:1 (Summer 2000), 5–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N.,Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979).Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. and Sagan, S., The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (New York: Norton, 2003).Google Scholar

Walzer, M., Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1977).Google Scholar

Wauthier, C., Quatre présidents et l'Afrique. De Gaulle, Pompidou, Giscard d'Estaing, Mitterrand: Quarante ans de politique africaine [Four Presidents and Africa. De Gaulle, Pompidou Giscard d'Estaing, Mitterrand: Forty years of African Policy] (Paris: Seuil, 1995).Google Scholar

Williams, P., The Senate and US Troops in Europe (London: Palgrave, 1985).CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, W., War Messages, 65th Congress, 1st Session, Senate Doc. No. 5, Serial No. 7264 (Washington, DC, 1917).Google Scholar

Wilzewski, J., “Back to Unilateralism: The Clinton Administration and the Republican-Led Congress,” in Dembinski, M. and Gerke, K. (eds.), Cooperation or Conflict? Transatlantic Relations in Transition (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), 23–43.Google Scholar

Wohlforth, W. C., “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security 21:1 (Summer 1999), 1–36.Google Scholar

Woodward, B., Bush at War (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002).Google Scholar

Woodward, B.,Plan of Attack (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004).Google Scholar

Wyatt-Walter, H., The European Community and the Security Dilemma 1989–1992 (London: Macmillan, 1997).Google Scholar

Yaniszewski, M., “Postcommunist Civil–Military Reform in Poland and Hungary: Progress and Problems,” Armed Forces and Society 28:3 (2002), 385–402.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yost, D., NATO Transformed: The Alliance's New Roles in International Security (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Zimmermann, H., “Governance by Negotiation: The EU, the United States and China's Integration into the World Trade System,” in Schirm, S. (ed.), Global Economic Governance (London: Palgrave, 2003), 67–86.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, H.,Money and Security: Troops, Monetary Policy, and West Germany's Relations with the United States and Britain, 1950–1971 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRef Google Scholar

Znoj, M., “Czech Attitudes Toward the War,” East European Constitutional Review 8:3 (1999), 47–50.Google Scholar