Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps and tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations and acronyms
- 1 Introduction: the importance of the Kargil conflict
- Part 1 Causes and conduct of the conflict
- Part 2 Consequences and impact of the conflict
- 8 Surprise at the top of the world: India's systemic and intelligence failure
- 9 Militants in the Kargil conflict: myths, realities, and impacts
- 10 The impact of the Kargil conflict and Kashmir on Indian politics and society
- 11 The Kargil conflict's impact on Pakistani politics and society
- Part 3 Lessons learned
- Index
9 - Militants in the Kargil conflict: myths, realities, and impacts
from Part 2 - Consequences and impact of the conflict
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps and tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- List of abbreviations and acronyms
- 1 Introduction: the importance of the Kargil conflict
- Part 1 Causes and conduct of the conflict
- Part 2 Consequences and impact of the conflict
- 8 Surprise at the top of the world: India's systemic and intelligence failure
- 9 Militants in the Kargil conflict: myths, realities, and impacts
- 10 The impact of the Kargil conflict and Kashmir on Indian politics and society
- 11 The Kargil conflict's impact on Pakistani politics and society
- Part 3 Lessons learned
- Index
Summary
Background: origins of the myth
In the spring of 1999, Pakistan executed a broad incursion across the Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir using 3–4,000 men equipped primarily with small arms from the then-paramilitary organization the Northern Light Infantry (NLI). Ostensibly, the Pakistani forces sought to make small territorial gains at tactically significant locations near the Indian town of Kargil. Initially, Indian reports characterized these intruders as mujahideen, or ghusbhaitiyan. Indian authorities later believed that a composite force of militants and Pakistani regulars executed the incursion. After the fighting intensified, however, Indian officials learned that this infiltrating force was comprised not of civilian militants, but rather nearly entirely of NLI troops supported by civilian porters, or razakars.
Curiously, many popular accounts of Kargil still sustain the myth that the operation was executed by mujahideen either operating alone or in tandem with Pakistani troops. This misperception about the intruding force has persisted for a number of reasons. First, the initial reporting of the incursion characterized these forces as mujahideen or jehadi militants and those accounts formed the basis of most subsequent analyses of the conflict. Second, and related to the first, Pakistan did not deny for many years after the crisis the Indian reports that these intruders were irregular fighters. Third, the international community did not publicly discount these claims even when the NLI's involvement was discerned.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Asymmetric Warfare in South AsiaThe Causes and Consequences of the Kargil Conflict, pp. 231 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
- 2
- Cited by