Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T10:57:28.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Sociocultural Implications for Assessment I

Classroom Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Pamela A. Moss
Edited by
Pamela A. Moss ,
Diana C. Pullin ,
James Paul Gee ,
Edward H. Haertel  and
Lauren Jones Young
Pamela A. Moss
Affiliation:
Professor of education, University of Michigan School of Education
Pamela A. Moss
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Diana C. Pullin
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
James Paul Gee
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Edward H. Haertel
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Lauren Jones Young
Affiliation:
The Spencer Foundation, Chicago
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I develop the implications of the earlier chapters – on sociocultural and situative perspectives – for the practice of classroom assessment. In chapter 11, Moss, Girard, and Greeno further develop the implications of these perspectives for assessment that crosses the boundaries – from the classroom to the school and from the school to the district, external organization, or beyond – to serve purposes of professional learning, evaluation, and accountability.

Perhaps the central message of the previous chapters on sociocultural and situative (SC/S) perspectives is that if we want to foster learning and opportunity to learn (OTL), we need to understand the dynamic “relationship between learners and their learning environment” (Gee, this volume, chapter 4). This includes the relationship between learners and the physical and conceptual tools in their environment; it also includes the relationship between learners and the other people in their environment. In fact, from an SC/S perspective, learning is routinely conceptualized in terms of changes in these relationships. Learners participate more proficiently in the community's activities, disciplinary concepts take on new meanings as they are put to work in solving problems, and so on. Even if one views learning as change in mental representations, the mental representation can only be acquired and demonstrated through interactions between learners and the tools and/or other people in their environment. There is no unmediated access to learning (Gee, this volume, chapter 4).

Type
Chapter
Information
Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn , pp. 222 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Education Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
Barton, D. and Tusting, K.. 2006. Beyond communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delandshere, G. 2002. Assessment as inquiry. Teachers College Record 104: 1461–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. 1993. Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, edited byChaiklin, S. and Lave, J., 64–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., and Punämaki, R., 19–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14: 134–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. 2007. Some thoughts on “proximal” formative assessment of student learning. In Evidence and decision making (Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), issue 1, edited by Moss, P. A.. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, edited by Shaw, R., and Bransford, J., 67–82. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual preception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gipps, C. V. 1999. Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In Review of Research in Education, edited by Iran-Nejad, A. and Pearson, P. D., 355–92. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Gipps, C. V. 2002. Sociocultural perspectives on assessment. In Learning for Life in the 21st Century, edited by Wells, G. and Claxton, G., 73–83. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeno, J. G. 2002. Students with competence, authority and accountability: Affording intellective identities in the classroom. The College Board.Google Scholar
Hickey, D. T. and Zuiker, S. J. 2003. A new perspective for evaluating innovative science programs. Science Education 87: 539–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P. H. 1992. Constructive evaluation of literate activity. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. and Putz, P.. 2004. Assessment as practice: Notes on measures, tests, and targets. Human Organization 63: 346–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampert, M. 2001. Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. 1993. The practice of learning. In Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, edited by Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J., 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. 1996. Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3: 149– 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, R J., J. P. Gee, and P. A. Moss. In press. On qualitative and quantitative reasoning about assessment validity. In generalizing from educational research: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative opposition, edited by Ercikan, K. and Roth, W. -M.. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Moss, P. A. 2004. The meaning and consequences of reliability. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29: 241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, P. A., Girard, B. J., and Haniford, L. C.. 2006. Validity in educational assessment. Review of Research in Education 30: 109–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, L. A. 2006. Classroom assessment. In Educational Measurement, 4th ed, edited by Brennan, R. L., 623–46. Westport, Conn.: American Council on Education/Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×