Bibliography

Devin Henry

doi:10.1017/9781108646680.012

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2019

Devin Henry

Show author details

Devin Henry: Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes
The Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation
, pp. 222 - 231

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646680.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, T. 2016. ‘Form vs. matter’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/form-matter/.Google Scholar

Algra, K. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 3: substantial change and the problem of not-being’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 91–121. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulos, A. 2013. ‘Aristotle’s Parmenidean dilemma’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95(3): 245–74.Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1982. ‘Aristotle on inefficient causes’, The Philosophical Quarterly 32 (129): 311–26.Google Scholar

Balme, D. [1972](1992). Aristotle: De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I (with passages from II.1–13). Translated with notes, with a report on recent work and additional bibliography by A. Gotthelf. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Balme, D. 1987. ‘Aristotle’s biology was not essentialist’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 291–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Balme, D. 1962. ‘GENOS and EIDOS in Aristotle’s biology’, The Classical Quarterly, New Series 12(1): 81–98.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 2000. Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1982. Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bodnar, I. 2012. ‘Aristotle’s natural philosophy’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/aristotle-natphil/.Google Scholar

Bodnar, I. 2005. ‘Teleology across nature’, Rhizai 2: 9–29.Google Scholar

Bodnar, I. 1997. ‘Movers and elemental motion in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15: 81–117.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s natural teleology in Physics II’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 121–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2010. ‘Biology and metaphysics in Aristotle’, in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, pp. 30–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1987. ‘Definition and scientific method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 120–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bostock, D. 2006. Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bostock, D. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Z and H. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 4: distinguishing alteration’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 123–50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Broadie [Waterlow], S. 1982. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Brown, L. 1994. ‘The verb “to be” in Greek philosophy’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Language (Companions to Ancient Thought 3), pp. 212–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, L. 1986. ‘Being in the Sophist: a syntactic inquiry’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 49–70. Reprinted in G. Fine (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, 1999, pp. 455–78, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 1: a false start?’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 25–63. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2004. ‘Aristotle on the foundations of sublunary physics’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 7–24. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Carraro, N. 2017. ‘Aristotle’s embryology and Ackrill’s Problem’, Phronesis 62(3): 274–304.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2018. ‘Physics I 7’, in Quarantotto, D. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration, pp. 178–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2010. Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2004. ‘Simple genesis and prime matter’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 151–69. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2001. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 1991. ‘Teleological causation in the Physics’, in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, pp. 101–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 1988. ‘Aristotle on hypothetical necessity and irreducibility’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69: 1–53.Google Scholar

Charlton, W. 1970. Aristotle’s Physics Books 1 & 2. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Code, A. 2003. ‘Changes, powers and potentialities in Aristotle’, in Reshotko, N. (ed.), Desire, Identity and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner, pp. 251–71. Kelowna: Academic Printing & Publishing.Google Scholar

Code, A. 1995. ‘Potentiality in Aristotle’s Science and Metaphysics’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76(3/4): 405–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Code, A. 1987. ‘Soul as efficient cause in Aristotle’s embryology’. Philosophical Topics 15 (2): 51–9.Google Scholar

Code, A. 1976. ‘The persistence of Aristotelian matter’, Philosophical Studies 29(6): 357–67.Google Scholar

Connell, S. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Connell, S. 2001. ‘An integrated approach to Aristotle as a biological philosopher’, Review of Metaphysics 55(2): 297–322.Google Scholar

Cook, K. 1996. ‘Sexual inequality in Aristotle’s theories of reproduction and inheritance’ in Ward, Julie K. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, pp. 51–67. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1988. ‘Metaphysics in Aristotle’s embryology’, Cambridge Philological Society Proceedings, 214 (new series 34): 14–41.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1987. ‘Hypothetical necessity and natural teleology’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 243–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1982. ‘Aristotle on natural teleology’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos, pp. 197–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. and Gregoric, P.. 2010. ‘Separability vs. difference: parts and capacities of the soul in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar

Curd, P. 2011. A Presocratics Reader: Selected Fragments and Testimonia. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

De Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., eds. 2004. Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ebrey, D. In press. ‘The matter for birth, life, and the elements’, in Taub, L. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Ancient Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ebrey, D. 2018. ‘The definition of matter in Physics I’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Ebrey, D. 2007. ‘Aristotle’s motivation for matter’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Ebrey, D. (ed.) 2015. Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M. 2015. ‘Eulogos in natural scientific inquiry’, in Ebrey, D., Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy, pp. 217–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fankhauser, D. 2017. ‘Rennet for making cheese’, www.biology.clc.uc.edu/fankhauser/Cheese/Rennet/Rennet.html.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, M. 1989. ‘Plato and Aristotle on negative predication’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 71(3): 257–82.Google Scholar

Frede, D. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 10: on mixtures and mixables’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J., Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 289–314. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1994. ‘Aristotle’s notion of potentiality in Metaphysics’, in Scaltas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M.-L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, pp. 173–94. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Freeland, C. 1987. ‘Aristotle on bodies, matter, and potentiality’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 392–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Freudenthal, G. 1999. Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Frey, C. 2015. ‘From blood to flesh: homonymy, unity, and ways of being in Aristotle’, Ancient Philosophy 35(2): 375–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Frey, C. 2007. ‘Organic unity and the matter of man’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 167–204.Google Scholar

Furth, M. 1988. Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gelber, J. 2010. ‘Form and inheritance in Aristotle’s embryology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212.Google Scholar

Gill, M-L. 2016. ‘Aristotle’s hylomorphism in Metaphysics Theta’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Gill, M-L. 2014. ‘The limits of teleology in Aristotle’s Meteorology IV.12’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4: 335–50.Google Scholar

Gill, M-L. 2012. Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gill, M-L. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., eds. 1987. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2018. ‘Aristotle on animals’, in Adamson, P. and Edwards, G. F. (eds.), Animals: A History, pp. 9–26. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2017. ‘Aristotle on epigenesis’, in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide, pp. 89–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2015a. ‘Substantial generation in Physics I.5–7’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 144–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2015b. ‘The cosmological significance of animal generation’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, pp. 100–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2014. ‘The birds and the bees: Aristotle on the biological concept of analogy’, in Gurtler, G. M. SJ and Wians, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 145–69. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2013. ‘Optimality reasoning in Aristotle’s natural teleology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 225–63.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2011. ‘Review of Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 11 May, http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/explanation-and-teleology-in-aristotle-s-science-of-nature/.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2009. ‘Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, pp. 368–83. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2008. ‘Organismal natures’, in Mouracade, J. (ed.), Aristotle on Life. Special issue of Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 41(3): 47–74.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2007a. ‘How sexist is Aristotle’s developmental biology?’, Phronesis 52(3): 251–69.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2007b. ‘Review of Monte Ransome Johnson Aristotle on Teleology’, Ancient Philosophy 27(1): 191–200.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2006a. ‘Aristotle on the mechanisms of inheritance’, Journal of the History of Biology 39: 425–55.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2006b. ‘Understanding Aristotle’s reproductive hylomorphism’, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 39(3): 257–88.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2005. ‘Embryological models in ancient philosophy’, Phronesis 50(1): 1–42.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. 2010. ‘The sense and reference of Kalon in Aristotle’, Classical Philology 105(4): 381–96.Google Scholar

Joachim, H. H. 1951. Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Joachim, H. H. 1926. Aristotle on Coming-to-Be and Passing-Away. Revised text with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2015. ‘The two kinds of ends in Aristotle: the view from de Anima’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, pp. 119–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus–Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s architectonic sciences’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, pp. 163–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2005. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, B. 1974. ‘Aristotle’s Introduction of Matter’, The Philosophical Review 83(4): 474–500.Google Scholar

Judson, L. 2005. ‘Aristotelian teleology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 341–66.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. 2009. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. 1981. ‘Some philosophical uses of “to be” in Plato’, Phronesis 26(2): 105–34.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. 1986. ‘Retrospective on the verb “to be” and the concept of being’, in Knuuttila, S. and Hintikka, J. (eds.), The Logic of Being, pp. 1–28. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Katz, E. 2017. ‘Commentary on GC II 9’, paper presented at the Notre Dame Centre for Aristotelian Studies Workshop, University of Notre Dame, 13 May 2017.Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2015. ‘Aristotle on interpreting nature’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 31–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2010. ‘Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics’, Ancient Philosophy 30(1): 107–24.Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2008. ‘The place of I 7 in the argument of Physics I’, Phronesis 53(2): 180–208.Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2006. ‘Aristotle Physics I 8’, Phronesis 51(4): 330–61.Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2003. ‘Aristotle’s definition of nature’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 59–87.Google Scholar

Kono, T., Obata, Y., Wu, Q., Niwa, K., Ono, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Park, E. S., Seo, J. S., and Ogawa, H. 2004. ‘Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood’, Nature 428(6985): 860–4.Google Scholar

Kosman, L. A. 2010. ‘Male and female in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, in Lennox, James G. and Bolton, Robert (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, pp. 147–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krizan, M. 2013. ‘Substantial change and the limiting case of Aristotelian matter’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 30(4): 293–310.Google Scholar

Kullman, W. (1985). ‘Different concepts of the final cause in Aristotle’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday, pp. 170–5. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Google Scholar

Kupreeva, I. 2010. ‘Aristotle on causation and conditional necessity: An. Post. 2.12 in context’, in de Haas, F., Leunissen, M., and Martijn, M. (eds.), Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond, pp. 203–34. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lane, M. S. 1998. Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lang, H. 1998. The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lear, J. 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2019. ‘Looking for the formative power in Aristotle’s nutritive soul’, in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2018. ‘“Most natural among the functions of living things”: reproduction as a nutritive function’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2010. ‘Bios and explanatory unity in Aristotle’s biology’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, pp. 329–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2008. ‘“As if we were investigating snubness”: Aristotle on the prospects for a single science of nature’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 149–86.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2004a. ‘Aristotle on the emergence of material complexity: Meteorologica IV and Aristotle’s biology’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4(2): 272–305.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2004b. ‘The place of zoology in Aristotle’s natural philosophy’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, pp. 58–70. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001a. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001b. ‘Aristotle on the unity and disunity of science’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15(2): 133–44.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001c. Aristotle on the Parts of Animals I-IV. Translation with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1999. ‘Teleology’, in Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, pp. 324–23. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1994. ‘Putting philosophy of science to the test: the case of Aristotle’s biology’, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 239–47.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1985. ‘Are Aristotelian Species Eternal?’, in Gotthelf, Allan (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, pp. 67–94. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1982. ‘Teleology, chance, and Aristotle’s theory of spontaneous generation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 20(3): 219–38.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2012a. ‘Crafting natures: Aristotle on animal design’, in Dicker, G. (ed.), The Annual Proceedings of the Center for Philosophic Exchange, pp. 28–51. Brockport: SUNY.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2012b. ‘Aristotle on natural character and its implications for moral development’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(4): 507–30.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. and Gotthelf, A.. 2010. ‘What’s teleology got to do with it? A reinterpretation of Generation of Animals V’, Phronesis 55(4): 325–56.Google Scholar

Lewis, E. 2014. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Meteorology 4. Translation with introduction by E. Lewis. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Lewis, E. 1994. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Meteorology 4. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. ‘Empirical research in Aristotle’s biology’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 53–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Loux, M. J. 1992. ‘Aristotle and Parmenides: an interpretation of Physics A8’, in Cleary, J. and Wians, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 281–319. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Mason, A. 2006. ‘Plato on necessity and chaos’, Philosophical Studies 127(2): 283–98.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. 1982. ‘Accidental unities’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy, pp. 223–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. 2004. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2002. ‘Aristotle’s definition of soul and the programme of the De Anima’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 83–139.Google Scholar

Meyer, S. Suavé 1992. ‘Aristotle, teleology, and reduction’, Philosophical Review 101(4): 791–825.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mohr, R. 1982. ‘The world-soul in the Platonic cosmology’, Illinois Classical Studies 7(1): 41–8.Google Scholar

Morrow, G. R. 1950. ‘Necessity and persuasion in Plato’s Timaeus’, Philosophical Review 59(2): 147–63.Google Scholar

Notomi, N. 1999. The Unity of Plato’s Sophist: Between the Sophist and the Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1999. ‘Plato on not-being’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, pp. 416–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Originally published in Vlastos, G. (ed.) 1970, Plato, i: Metaphysics and Epistemology, New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. 2008. ‘Parmenides’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Feb. 2008) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/parmenides/.Google Scholar

Peck, A. L. 1942. Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Translation with notes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pellegrin, P. 1986. Aristotle’s Classification of Animals: Biology and the Conceptual Unity of the Aristotelian Corpus. Translated into English by A. Preus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pellegrin, P. 1985. ‘Aristotle: zoology without species’, translated into English by A. Preus, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, pp. 95–116. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Google Scholar

Quarantotto, D. 2015. ‘A dynamic ontology: on how Aristotle arrived at the conclusion that eternal change accomplishes ousia’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 162–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, H. M. 1974. ‘Prime matter in Aristotle’, Phronesis 19(2): 168–88.Google Scholar

Rosen, Jacob. 2015. ‘Physics V–VI versus VIII: unity of change and disunity in the Physics’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 206–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1953. Aristotle: Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle: Physics. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Scharle, M. 2015. ‘“And these things follow”: teleology, necessity, and explanation in Aristotle’s Meteorologica’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy, pp. 79–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scharle, M. 2008. ‘Elemental teleology in Aristotle’s Physics 2.8’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 147–83.Google Scholar

Schut, E., Hemmings, N., and Brickhead, T. R.. 2008. ‘Parthenogenesis in a passerine bird, the Zebra Finch Taeniopygia guttata’, Ibis 150(1): 197–9.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2010. ‘Teleology: Aristotelian and Platonic’, in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, pp. 5–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I. 2’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 65–89. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1991. ‘Is Aristotle’s teleology anthropocentric?’, Phronesis 36(2): 179–96.Google Scholar

Segev, M. 2015. ‘Review of Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, by David Ebrey’, Notre Dame Philosophical Review 2 November, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/theory-and-practice-in-aristotle-s-natural-science.Google Scholar

Shields, C. 2016. Aristotle: De anima. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Shields, C. 2007. ‘Substance and life in Aristotle’, in Mouracade, J. (ed.), Aristotle on Life. Special issue of Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 41(3): 129–52.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 1980. Necessity, Cause, and Blame. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Stavrianeas, S. 2015. ‘Nature as a principle of change’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics. A Critical Guide, pp. 46–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strange, S. 1999. ‘The double explanation in Plato’s Timaeus’, in Fine, G. (ed.), Plato 1. Metaphysics and Epistemology, pp. 397–415. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Tredennick, H. 1933. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Translated with introduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tress, D. McGowan 1999. ‘Aristotle against the Hippocratics on sexual generation: a reply to Coles’, Phronesis 44(3): 228–41.Google Scholar

Tress, D. McGowan 1992. ‘The metaphysical science of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals and its feminist critics’, The Review of Metaphysics 46(2): 307–41.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. 1969. ‘Reasons and causes in the Phaedo’, Philosophical Review 78(3): 291–325.Google Scholar

Wardy, R. 1993. ‘Aristotelian rainfall and the lore of averages’, Phronesis 38(1): 18–30.Google Scholar

Whiting, J. 2002. ‘Locomotive soul: the parts of soul in Aristotle’s scientific works’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 141–200.Google Scholar

Whiting, J. 1990. ‘Aristotle on form and generation’, in Cleary, J. and Shartin, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 35–63. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Williams, C. J. F. 1999. Philoponus: Aristotle on Coming-to-Be and Perishing. Translated with an introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Williams, C. J. F. 1982. Aristotle’s De Generatione et Corruptione. Translated with notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 2015. ‘In defense of the craft analogy: artifacts and natural teleology’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 107–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 2003. Ways of Being: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Witt, C. 1998. ‘Form, normativity, and gender in Aristotle: a feminist perspective’, in Freeland, C. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, pp. 118–37. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 1994. ‘The priority of actuality’, in Scaltas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M-L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, pp. 215–28. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 1989. Substance and Essence in Aristotle. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 1985. ‘Form, reproduction, and inherited characteristics in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, Phronesis 30(1): 46–57.Google Scholar

Yu, J. 2003. The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Vol. 52, The New Synthesis Historical Library. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive