Book contents
- Apollonius Rhodius, Herodotus and Historiography
- Apollonius Rhodius, Herodotus and Historiography
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Receiving Herodotus
- Chapter 2 Creating Authorities
- Chapter 3 Explaining the Past
- Chapter 4 Telling Stories
- Chapter 5 Greeks and Non-Greeks
- Chapter 6 Kings and Leaders
- Conclusions and Consequences
- Select Bibliography
- Index of Subjects
- Index of Passages
- References
Select Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 January 2020
Book contents
- Apollonius Rhodius, Herodotus and Historiography
- Apollonius Rhodius, Herodotus and Historiography
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Receiving Herodotus
- Chapter 2 Creating Authorities
- Chapter 3 Explaining the Past
- Chapter 4 Telling Stories
- Chapter 5 Greeks and Non-Greeks
- Chapter 6 Kings and Leaders
- Conclusions and Consequences
- Select Bibliography
- Index of Subjects
- Index of Passages
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Apollonius Rhodius, Herodotus and Historiography , pp. 218 - 232Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Select Bibliography
Acosta-Hughes, B. 2002. Polyeideia: The Iambi of Callimachus and the Archaic Iambic Tradition. Berkeley and London.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. 2010. Arion’s Lyre: Archaic Lyric into Hellenistic Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B., Stephens, S. 2002. ‘Rereading Callimachus’ Aetia Fragment 1’, CPh 97: 238–55.Google Scholar
Ager, S. 1996. Interstate Arbitration in the Greek World, 337–90 BC. Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, S. 1997. ‘The heroic past in a Hellenistic present’, in Cartledge, P., Garnsey, P., Gruen, E. S. (eds.), Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History and Historiography (Berkeley and London): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., Corcella, A. 2007. Herodotus Books I–IV (edited by Murray, O., Moreno, A.). Oxford.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 2013. ‘Minding the gap: aetiology and (false) closure’, in Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B., Kirichenko, A. (eds.), The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art (Heidelberg): 63–82.Google Scholar
Bagordo, A. 2003. Reminiszenzen früher Lyrik bei den attischen Tragikern: Beiträge zur Anspielungstechnik und poetischen Tradition. Munich.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Dialogic Imagination (translated by Emerson, C., Holquist, M.). Austin.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. 2002. ‘The making of history: Herodotus’ Historiēs Apodexis’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 3–32.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), 2012a. Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. 2012b. ‘Introduction’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 1–56.Google Scholar
Barbantani, S. 2003. ‘Callimachus and the contemporary historical “epic”’, Hermathena 173/4: 29–47.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001. ‘The crossing’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature (Oxford): 142–63.Google Scholar
Bertelli, L. 2002. ‘Perì basileias: i trattati sulla regalità dal IV secolo a.C.’, in Bettiolo, P., Filoramo, G. (eds.), Il dio mortale: teologie politiche tra antico e contemporeaneo (Brescia): 17–61.Google Scholar
Bettenworth, A. 2005. ‘Odysseus bei Aietes: primäre und sekondäre Intertexte bei Apollonios Rhodios’, in Harder, A., Cuypers, M. (eds.), Beginning from Apollo: Studies in Apollonius Rhodius and the Argonautic Tradition (Leuven): 1–17.Google Scholar
Beye, C. R. 1999. ‘Vergil and Apollonius’, in Perkell, C. G. (ed.), Reading Vergil’s Aeneid (Norman): 271–84.Google Scholar
Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. 1996. ‘Introduction’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 9–14.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2000. ‘Herodotus’ genres’, in Depew, M., Obbink, D. (eds.), Matrices of Genres (Cambridge and London): 97–114.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1988. From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1986. ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1993. ‘Lies, fiction and slander in early Greek poetry’, in Gill, C., Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Exeter): 1–37.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2001. ‘Early Greek Iambic poetry: the importance of narrative’, in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A., Barchiesi, A. (eds.), Iambic Ideas (Lanham): 1–27.Google Scholar
Brock, R. 2003. ‘Authorial voice and narrative management in Herodotus’, in Derow, P., Parker, R. (eds.), Herodotus and His World (Oxford): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulloch, A. W. 1985a. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Easterling, P. E., Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 1, part 4 (Cambridge): 541–621.Google Scholar
Bulloch, A. W. 2010. ‘Hymns and encomia’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Malden and Oxford): 166–80.Google Scholar
Byre, C. S. 2002. A Reading of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica: The Poetics of Uncertainty. Lewiston and Lampeter.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2003. Myth and History in Ancient Greece (translated by Berman, D. W.). Princeton.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 1988. Historie und Historiker in den griechischen Inschriften. Epigraphische Beiträge zur griechischen Historiographie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Chiasson, C. 2012. ‘Herodotus’ Prologue and the Greek poetic tradition’, Histos 6: 114–43.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. 2012. ‘The Argonautic anabasis: myth and Hellenic identity in Apollonius’ Argonautica’, in Cusset, C., Le Meur-Weissman, N., Levin, F. (eds.), Mythe et pouvoir à l’époque hellénistique (Leuven): 417–37.Google Scholar
Cobet, J. 2002. ‘The organization of time in the Histories’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 387–412.Google Scholar
Cohn, D. 1989. ‘Fictional versus historical lives’, The Journal of Narrative Technique 19.1: 3–24.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. 1985. ‘Historical writing in the fourth century BC and the Hellenistic period’, in Easterling, P. E., Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 1 (Cambridge): 458–71.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. 2004. ‘Les Argonautiques d’Apollonios de Rhodes comme itinéraire à travers la sauvagerie’, in Charpentier, M.-C. (ed.), Les Espaces du sauvage dans le monde antique (Besançon): 31–52.Google Scholar
Cuypers, M. 2004. ‘Apollonius of Rhodes’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., Bowie, A. M. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature (Leiden): 43–62.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1985. ‘Les logoi des autres dans les Histoires d’Hérodote’, Quaderni di Storia 22: 105–28.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1987. Le discourse du particulier: essai sur l’enquête hérodotéenne. Paris.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 1999. ‘Aspects narratologiques des Histoires d’Hérodote’, Lalies 19: 217–75.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2012. ‘The Helen logos and Herodotus’ fingerprint’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 127–42.Google Scholar
Delage, E. 1930. La géographie dans les Argonautiques d’Apollonios de Rhodes. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
De Ste Croix, G. E. M. 1975. ‘Aristotle on history and poetry’, in Levick, B. (ed.), The Ancient Historian and His Materials (Farnborough): 45–58.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1987. ‘Narrative surface and authorial voice in Herodotus’ Histories’, Arethusa 20: 147–70.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2002. ‘“I didn’t give my own genealogy”: Herodotus and the authorial persona’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 267–89.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2003. ‘Form and content: the question of tyranny in Herodotus’, in Morgan, K. A. (ed.), Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and its Discontents in Ancient Greece (Austin): 25–58.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2012. ‘Myth and legend in Herodotus’ first book’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 59–85.Google Scholar
Dillery, J. 2007. ‘Clio’s other sons: Berossus and Manetho’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography (Malden and Oxford): 221–30.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. 1994. ‘Archaic Greek foundation poetry: questions of genre and occasion’, JHS 114: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufner, C. M. 1988. ‘The Odyssey in the Argonautica: reminiscence, revision, reconstruction’, unpublished dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. 1955. The Myth of the Eternal Return or, Cosmos and History (translated by Trask, W. R.). London.Google Scholar
Eliade, M. 1969. ‘Cosmogonic myth and “sacred history”’, in The Quest: History and Meaning in Religion (Chicago): 72–87.Google Scholar
Endsjø, D. 1997. ‘Placing the unplaceable: the making of Apollonius’ Argonautic geography’, GRBS 38: 373–85.Google Scholar
Engels, J. 2008. ‘Universal history and cultural geography of the oikumene in Herodotus’ Historiai and Strabo’s Geographica’, in Pigón, J. (ed.), The Children of Herodotus (Newcastle upon Tyne): 144–61.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. 1956. ‘Der erste Satz im Werke Herodots’, in Erbse, H. (ed.), Festschrift Bruno Snell (Munich): 209–22.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. 1995. ‘Culture and power in Ptolemaic Egypt: the Museum and Library of Alexandria’, G&R 42: 38–48.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. 2002. ‘Life after death: Alexandria and the body of Alexander’, G&R 49: 163–79.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 1993. ‘Il sistema letterario della poesia alessandrina nel III sec. A.C.’, in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L., Lanza, D. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica, vol. I.2 (Rome): 31–73.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2001. ‘“Homeric” formularity in the Argonautica of Apollonius of Rhodes’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius (Leiden): 171–91.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2005. ‘“Posidippus” at court: the contribution of the Hippika of P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309 to the ideology of Ptolemaic kingship’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book (Oxford): 249–68.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M., Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2003. ‘Classical genre in theory and practice’, New Literary History 34: 383–408.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2007. ‘Narrating ambiguity: murder and Macedonian allegiance (5.17–22)’, in Irwin, E., Greenwood, E. (eds.), Reading Herodotus (Cambridge): 98–127.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. 1989. Herodotus and his ‘Sources’: Citation, Invention and Narrative Art (translated by Howie, J. G.). Leeds.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. 1994. ‘The art of Herodotus and the margins of the world’, in von Martels, Z. (ed.), Travel Fact and Travel Fiction: Studies on Fiction, Literary Tradition, Scholarly Discovery, and Observation in Travel Writing (Leiden): 1–15.Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, S. 2017. ‘The leadership styles of the Persian kings in Herodotus’ Histories’, unpublished dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Fleischer, R. 1996. ‘Hellenistic royal iconography on coins’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 28–40.Google Scholar
Forsdyke, S. 2006. ‘Herodotus, political history and political thought’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 224–41.Google Scholar
Foster, E., Lateiner, D. 2012b. ‘Introduction’, in Foster, E., Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford): 1–9.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 1997. ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 2001. ‘Early Historiē and literacy’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford): 95–115.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 2010. ‘Gods in early Greek historiography’, in Bremmer, J. N., Erskine, A. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations (Edinburgh): 318–34.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 1992. ‘Necessity, chance, and “what happens for the most part” in Aristotle’s Poetics’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics (Princeton): 197–219.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 2008. ‘Apollonius Rhodius as “inventor” of the interior monologue’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 147–66.Google Scholar
Giangiulio, M. 2001. ‘Constructing the past: colonial traditions and the writing of history. The case of Cyrene’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford): 116–37.Google Scholar
Giubilo, B. 2008. ‘L’ ἀλήθεια e i suoi sinonimi nella poesia alessandrina (Callimaco, Teocrito, Apollonio Rodio, Eronda)’, unpublished dissertation, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’.Google Scholar
Gould, J. 1994. ‘Herodotus and religion’, in Hornblower, S. (ed.), Greek Historiography. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gozzoli, S. 1970/1. ‘Una teoria antica sull’origine della storiografia greca’, SCO 19/20: 158–211.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 2007. ‘Why can’t biologists read poetry? Ian McEwan’s Enduring Love’, Twentieth Century Literature 53: 93–124.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 1999. ‘Euenius the negligent nightwatchman (Herodotus 9.92–6)’, in Buxton, R. (ed.), From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought (Oxford): 169–82.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 2006. ‘Stories and storytelling in the Histories’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 130–44.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. (in press). Herodotus: Histories Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1996. ‘Hellenistic kingship: puzzles, problems, and possibilities’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 115–25.Google Scholar
Hall, J. M. 2001. ‘Contested ethnicities: perceptions of Macedonia within evolving definitions of Greek identity’, in Malkin, I. (ed.), Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity (Cambridge): 159–86.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, M. A. 1994. ‘Travel descriptions in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius’, in von Martels, Z. (ed.), Travel Fact and Travel Fiction: Studies on Fiction, Literary Tradition, Scholarly Discovery, and Observation in Travel Writing (Leiden): 16–29.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. 2002. ‘Intertextuality in Callimachus’ Aetia’, in Lehnus, L., Montanari, F. (eds.), Callimaque (Geneva): 189–233.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. 2013. ‘Intertextuality as discourse: the discussion on poetry and poetics among Hellenistic Greek poets in the third century bce’, in Bauks, M., Horowitz, W., Lange, A. (eds.), Between Text and Text (Göttingen): 232–42.Google Scholar
Harding, P. 2007. ‘Local history and Atthidography’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography (Malden and Oxford): 180–8.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2003. ‘The cause of things: envy and the emotions in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Konstan, D., Rutter, N. K. (eds.), Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece (Edinburgh): 143–63.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. 1993. ‘Callimachus’ Hymns’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus (Leuven): 111–25.Google Scholar
Hazzard, R. 2000. Imagination of a Monarchy: Studies in Ptolemaic Propaganda. Toronto.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., Hainsworth, J. B. 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey: Books I–VIII, vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. 2006. ‘Literary history as a provocation to reception studies’, in Martindale, C., Thomas, R. F. (eds.), Classics and the Uses of Reception (Malden and Oxford): 23–31.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2010. ‘Some distinguishing features of deliberate fictionality in Greek biographical narratives’, in Borghart, P., de Temmermann, K. (eds.), Biography and Fictionality in the Greek Literary Tradition (Phrasis special issue 51.1): 11–35.Google Scholar
Hollmann, A. 2005. The Master of Signs: Signs and the Interpretation of Signs in Herodotus’ Histories. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Hollmann, A. 2011. ‘The manipulation of signs in Herodotos’ “Histories”’, TAPhA 135: 279–327.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2002. ‘Herodotus and his sources of information’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 373–86.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2006. ‘Herodotus’ influence in antiquity’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 306–18.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1987. ‘Medea’s flight: the fourth book of the Argonautica’, CQ 37: 129–39.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1991. ‘Greek and non-Greek in the Argonautica of Apollonius’, in Saïd, S. (ed.), ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ (Strasbourg): 81–99.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1992. ‘Writing the God: form and meaning in Callimachus, Hymn to Athena’, MD 29: 9–34.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2003. Theocritus: Encomium of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2004. ‘Theocritus and Moschus’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., Bowie, A. M. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature (Leiden): 83–97.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2008. ‘The poetics of narrative in the Argonautica’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 115–46.Google Scholar
Hunter, R., Fuhrer, T. 2002. ‘Imaginary gods? Poetic theology in the Hymns of Callimachus’, in Lehnus, L., Montanari, F. (eds.), Callimaque (Geneva): 143–87.Google Scholar
Isager, S. 2004. ‘The Salmakis inscription: some reactions to the edition princeps’, in Isager, S., Pedersen, P. (eds.), The Salmakis Inscription and Hellenistic Halikarnassos (Odense): 9–13.Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1989. Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. 1909. ‘Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Historiographie und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente’, Klio 9: 80–123.Google Scholar
Jauss, H.-R. 1982. Towards an Aesthetic of Reception (translated by Bahti, T.). Brighton.Google Scholar
Karttunen, K. 2002. ‘The ethnography of the fringes’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 457–74.Google Scholar
Koenen, L. 1993. ‘The Ptolemaic king as a religious figure’, in Bulloch, A., Gruen, E. S., Long, A. A., Stewart, A. (eds.), Images and Ideologies (Berkeley): 25–115.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 2010. ‘Apollonius’ Argonautica’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Malden and Oxford): 136–50.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. 2007. Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. 2000. ‘On the margins of epic: the foundation poems of Apollonius’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Apollonius Rhodius (Leuven): 69–84.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. 2004. ‘Callimachus and the pedestrian Muse’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus II (Leuven): 173–83.Google Scholar
Levin, D. N. 1971. Apollonius’ Argonautica Re-Examined: The Neglected First and Second Books. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. B. 1988. ‘Herodotus on Egyptians and Libyans’, in Nenci, G., Reverdin, O. (eds.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs (Geneva): 215–54.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. B. 2000. ‘Ptolemaic Egypt’, in Shaw, I. (ed.), Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford): 395–421.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1990. ‘A Hellenistic miscellany’, in Lloyd-Jones, H. (ed.), Academic Papers, vol. 2 (Oxford): 231–49.Google Scholar
Lombardo, M. 1988. ‘Erodoto Storico dei Lidî’, in Nenci, G., Reverdin, O. (eds.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs (Geneva): 171–214.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2001. ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford): 138–60.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2006. ‘Meta-historiê: method and genre in the Histories’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 76–91.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1994. ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: subversion by intertextuality: Catullus 66.39–40 and other examples’, G&R 41: 187–204.Google Scholar
Ma, J. 2003. ‘Kings’, in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World (Malden and Oxford): 175–95.Google Scholar
McGing, B. 2012. ‘Polybius and Herodotus’, in Smith, C., Yarrow, L. M. (eds.), Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius (Oxford): 33–49.Google Scholar
Magnelli, E. 2010. ‘Nicander’, in Harder, A., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Malden and Oxford): 211–23.Google Scholar
Malkin, I. 2003. ‘“Tradition” in Herodotus: the foundation of Cyrene’, in Derow, P., Parker, R. (eds.), Herodotus and His World (Oxford): 153–70.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 1987. ‘Herodotean narrative and the narrator’s presence’, Arethusa 20: 121–42.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. 1999. ‘Genre, convention and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography’, in Kraus, C. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts (Leiden) 281–324.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2008. ‘Apollonius as a Hellenistic geographer’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 267–86.Google Scholar
Minton, W. W. 1960. ‘Homer’s invocations of the Muses: traditional patterns’, TAPhA 91: 292–309.Google Scholar
Mori, A. 2001. ‘Personal favor and public influence: Arete, Arsinoe II, and the Argonautica’, Oral Tradition 16: 85–106.Google Scholar
Mori, A. 2005. ‘Jason’s reconciliation with Telamon: a moral exemplar in Apollonius’ Argonautica’, AJPh 109: 209–36.Google Scholar
Mori, A. 2008b. ‘Piety and diplomacy in Apollonius’ Argonautica’, in McKechnie, P. R., Guillaume, P. (eds.), Ptolemy Philadelphus and his World (Leiden): 149–69.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. 2007. The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, A. D. 2011. ‘Callimachus’ Muses’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L., Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus (Leiden): 329–48.Google Scholar
Moyer, I. 2013. ‘Berossos and Manetho’, in Haubold, J., Lanfranchi, G. B., Rollinger, R., Steele, R. (eds.), The World of Berossos (Wiesbaden): 213–33.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. 2007. ‘The trouble with the Ionians: Herodotus and the beginning of the Ionian Revolt’, in Irwin, E., Greenwood, E. (eds.), Reading Herodotus (Cambridge): 146–67.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1996. ‘Hellenistic royal symposia’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 15–27.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2007. ‘Philosophy and monarchy in the Hellenistic world’, in Rajak, T., Pearce, S., Aitken, J., Dines, J. (eds.), Jewish Perspectives on Hellenistic Rulers (Berkeley): 13–28.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2008. ‘Ptolemaic royal patronage’, in McKechnie, P. R., Guillaume, P. (eds.), Ptolemy II Philadelphus and His World (Leiden): 9–24.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2002. ‘Plato’s Muses’, in Spentzou, E., Fowler, D. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse (Oxford): 29–46.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2004. ‘The Muses and their arts’, in Murray, P., Wilson, P. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City (Oxford): 365–89.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2005. ‘The Muses: creativity personified?’, in Herrin, J., Stafford, E. (eds.), Personification in the Greek World (Aldershot): 147–59.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. 2008. ‘Apollonius and Virgil’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 341–62.Google Scholar
Orth, E. 1925. ‘Ein Fragment des Herodorus. Zu Demetrios par. 66’, Philologische Wochenschrift 45: 778–83.Google Scholar
Paap, A. 1948. De Herodoti reliquiis in papyris et membranis Aegyptiis servatis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Paduana-Faedo, L. 1970. ‘L’inversione del rapporto Poeta-Musa nella cultura ellenistica’, ASNP 39: 377–86.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. 1992. ‘Sappho 16, Gorgias’ Helen, and the preface to Herodotus’ Histories’, YClS 29: 63–84.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1991. ‘Thucydides’ Archidamus and Herodotus’ Artabanus’, BICS 37: 120–42.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1997. ‘East is East and West is West – or are they? National stereotypes in Herodotus’, Histos 1 (internet publication).Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2002. ‘Speech and action: Herodotus’ debate on the constitutions’, PCPhS 48: 123–58.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2006. ‘Homer and Herodotus’, in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F. , Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions (Oxford): 75–104.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1949–53. Callimachus. Vol. 1: Fragmenta, Vol. 2: Hymni et Epigrammata (Oxford).Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford).Google Scholar
Powers, N. 2002. ‘Magic, wonder and scientific explanation in Apollonius, Argonautica 4.1638–93’, PCPhS 48: 87–101.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. 1993. Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. 2014. Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture: Literary Studies in the Reception of the Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar
Priestley, J., Zali, V. (eds.), 2016. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Herodotus in Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1987. ‘Herodotus, political thought and the meaning of history’, Arethusa 20: 221–48.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2002. ‘Philosophy, science, politics: Herodotus and the intellectual trends of his time’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 149–86.Google Scholar
Regan, A. 2009. ‘The geography of kingship in Apollonius of Rhodes’, unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. 2008. ‘Apollonius Rhodius as a Homeric scholar’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 243–66.Google Scholar
Riemann, K. 1967. ‘Das herodoteische Geschichtswerk in der Antike’, unpublished dissertation, University of Munich.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1981. ‘Une épigramme satirique d’Automédon et Athènes au début de l’empire’, REG 94: 338–61.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. 1990. ‘Homeric philos: love of life and limbs, and friendship with one’s thumos’, in Craik, E. M. (ed.), Owls to Athens (Oxford): 97–108.Google Scholar
Rood, T. 2006. ‘Herodotus and foreign lands’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 290–305.Google Scholar
Roy, C. S. 2012. ‘The constitutional debate: Herodotus’ exploration of good government’, Histos 6: 298–320.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. 2012. ‘Structure and meaning in epic and historiography’, in Foster, E., Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford): 13–38.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2012. ‘Herodotus and the “myth” of the Trojan War’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 87–105.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. 2006. ‘Herodotus and Greek religion’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 192–208.Google Scholar
Sistakou, E. 2008. ‘Beyond the Argonautica: in search of Apollonius’ ktisis poems’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 311–40.Google Scholar
Sistakou, E. 2009. ‘“Snapshots of myth”: the notion of time in Hellenistic epyllion’, in Grethlein, J., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin and New York): 293–319.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. 2012. ‘Thucydides as “reader” of Herodotus’, in Foster, E., Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford): 39–66.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 1998. ‘Callimachus at court’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Genre in Hellenistic Poetry (Leuven): 167–85.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2000. ‘Writing epic in the Ptolemaic court’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Apollonius Rhodius (Leuven): 195–215.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2003. Seeing Double: Intercultural Poetics in Ptolemaic Alexandria. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2004. ‘For you, Arsinoe …’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E., Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309) (Cambridge): 161–76.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2005. ‘Battle of the books’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book (Oxford): 229–48.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2008. ‘Ptolemaic epic’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 95–114.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. 2011. ‘Remapping the Mediterranean: the Argo adventure in Apollonius and Callimachus’, in Obbink, D., Rutherford, R. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons (Oxford): 188–207.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1993. Faces of Power: Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 1982. ‘Herodot als Geschichtsforscher’, in Schmitthenner, W., Zoepffel, R. (eds.), Studien zur alten Geschichte, vol. 2. Hildesheim and New York.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. 2010. ‘Literature and the kings’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Oxford): 30–45.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1990. ‘Ideology, influence, and future studies in the Georgics’, Vergilius 66: 64–70.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2006. ‘The intellectual milieu of Herodotus’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 60–75.Google Scholar
Toye, D. L. 1995. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on the first Greek historians’, AJPh 116: 279–302.Google Scholar
Trüdinger, K. 1918. ‘Studien zur Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Ethnographie’. Dissertation, Basel.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. 1993. Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica 2.3.11–7.5.27. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Valverde Sánchez, M. 1989. El aition en las Argonáuticas de Apolonio de Rodas. Murcia.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, J. 1980. ‘The book-roll and some conventions of the poetic book’, Arethusa 13: 5–42.Google Scholar
Wecowksi, M. 2004. ‘The hedgehog and the fox: form and meaning in the Prologue of Herodotus’, JHS 124: 143–64.Google Scholar
West, S. 2011. ‘The papyri of Herodotus’, in Obbink, D., Rutherford, R. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons (Oxford): 69–83.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2010. ‘Prose fiction’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Oxford): 395–411.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 1996. ‘The character of Aeëtes in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius’, Hermes 124: 463–79.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 1998. ‘The concept and use of genre-marking in Hellenistic epic and fine art’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Genre in Hellenistic Poetry (Leuven): 225–38.Google Scholar
Zyroff, E. S. 1971. ‘The author’s apostrophe in epic from Homer through Lucan’, unpublished dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar