Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Staff experiences of racism
- Part III Student experiences of racism
- Part IV Research systems enabling racism
- Part V Teaching systems enabling racism
- Part VI Pedagogies that enable racism
- Part VII Governance, strategy and operational systems
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
17 - Operations and processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Staff experiences of racism
- Part III Student experiences of racism
- Part IV Research systems enabling racism
- Part V Teaching systems enabling racism
- Part VI Pedagogies that enable racism
- Part VII Governance, strategy and operational systems
- Part VIII Conclusion
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The neoliberal universities’ attempt at modernity does not extend to examining the Whiteness of academia and how it is sustained in the positions of leadership. The continuous quest for more data and statistics shows the focus has been proving the problem of racism exists instead of exploring what structures are in place that allow the domination of White leadership and the absence of racially minoritised leaders. Although universities are keen to engage in performative activism, little is done to examine White privilege in a meaningful way. The implementation of anti-racism, specifically the advancement of racially minoritised individuals, specifically Black leaders into leadership roles, is rare across the sector (UCU, 2019).
Reporting issues of racism is problematic; racially minoritised staff and students are often inadvertently identified if instances of racism are reported to manager staff in universities (Arday, 2018). This theme focuses on issues pertaining to reporting and processes for empowering racially minoritised staff to report racism in the university setting. Despite grand and generic pledges of anti-racism, little has been done to advance the significant lack of racially minoritised leaders in the universities’ governance, operations and systems (Arday & Wilson, 2021).
There is clear evidence of significant under-representation of racially minoritised staff Black, Asian and minority ethnic staff at all senior levels and operations in academia (Ahmed, 2012; Bhopal & Brown, 2016; ECU, 2015; Tate & Bagguley, 2017; HESA, 2016). As of the 2018/19 academic year, among academic staff, 475 managers, directors and senior officials identify as White, compared with 15 senior leaders who identify as Asian and none who identify as Black (HESA, 2020). A similar trend follows non-academic staff, with 10,510 managers, directors and senior officials identifying as White, compared with the disproportionate 410 who identify as Asian and 185 who identify as Black (HESA, 2020). Most of the racial justice work involves gathering the data, which Allen (2020) argues that
data will provide evidence of the problem and help you identify where race inequality is manifesting but there will always be too much and not enough … knowing when to dig deep and when to see the bigger picture will help you spot the patterns and trends because the data will not join the dots for itself.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anti-Racism in Higher EducationAn Action Guide for Change, pp. 172 - 181Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2022