Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface: Introducing an Overview of Trade Union Politics
- 1 The Legacy of State Authoritarian Unionism
- 2 Transition Out of State Authoritarian Unionism
- 3 The Rise and Decline of Union Militancy, 2010–13
- 4 The Labour Movement and “Go Politics”
- 5 Conclusions
- Appendix 1: The Politics of Wages and Indonesia's Trade Unions
- Appendix 2: Trade Unions’ Initiative to Create Alternative Political Force in Indonesia
- Bibliography
- Index
- About the Author
4 - The Labour Movement and “Go Politics”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2020
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface: Introducing an Overview of Trade Union Politics
- 1 The Legacy of State Authoritarian Unionism
- 2 Transition Out of State Authoritarian Unionism
- 3 The Rise and Decline of Union Militancy, 2010–13
- 4 The Labour Movement and “Go Politics”
- 5 Conclusions
- Appendix 1: The Politics of Wages and Indonesia's Trade Unions
- Appendix 2: Trade Unions’ Initiative to Create Alternative Political Force in Indonesia
- Bibliography
- Index
- About the Author
Summary
By early 2013—or even by the time of the Declaration of Industrial Harmony—the KSPI/FSPMI, under the leadership of Said Iqbal, appeared to be preparing for greater involvement in electoral politics. This was not a turn from apolitical unionism to political unionism, as some have argued,1 as Indonesian unions have always been intensely political. This was the case under the New Order when the FSPSI was integrated into the political system and campaigns supporting the New Order. It was the case with the unions after 1998, whose leaders either sought connections with political parties or engaged in lobbying and campaigning to influence government policy and legislative outcomes through the parliament. The new trajectory that became increasingly clear throughout 2013 and into 2014 was characterized by a systematic attempt to increase direct representation of the KSPSI/FSPMI in legislative bodies and later in executive positions, as well as a conscious alignment with a specific political bloc and perspective as, I will argue, a substitute for increasing the militancy and breadth of industrial campaigning—and not as its complement.
These developments since 2013—called by the union itself “Go Politik!”—were not the FSPMI's first experimentation with electoral politics. In 2009, FSPMI members, with national leadership approval, stood for several different parties in the province of Kepulauan Riau, including for the municipal council in the city of Batam. This was a reversal of union policy on electoral participation that occurred after a change in national leadership, that is, when Said Iqbal replaced Thamrin Mossi as president of the FSPMI in November 2006. According to Ford,2 there had been considerable discussion and efforts on the electoral front in Batam as early as 2004 and intense discussion in the national leadership.
The way in which FSPMI and other union members became candidates was very messy. There was an unofficial organization of FSPMI members in Batam, Jas Metal, who had been lobbying on this issue for some time. Some candidates had Jas Metal support, some put themselves forward without any organized backing. Other candidates were on a list issued by the FSPMI national leadership, which included Said Iqbal himself. As candidates for national, provincial or national parliaments needed to be on party lists, the union, Jas Metal and union members entered into talks with a range of parties.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2019