Book contents
- Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics
- Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- A Note from David A. Crocker
- Part I Development Ethics
- 1 Why Development Needs Philosophy
- 2 What Is Development?
- 3 Public Goods and Public Spirit
- 4 The Choice of a Moral Lens
- 5 Peacebuilding, Development, Agency and Ethics
- Part II Agency
- Part III Democracy
- Part IV Development Ethics, Agency, and Democracy
- Index
- References
1 - Why Development Needs Philosophy
from Part I - Development Ethics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2019
By
Book contents
- Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics
- Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- A Note from David A. Crocker
- Part I Development Ethics
- 1 Why Development Needs Philosophy
- 2 What Is Development?
- 3 Public Goods and Public Spirit
- 4 The Choice of a Moral Lens
- 5 Peacebuilding, Development, Agency and Ethics
- Part II Agency
- Part III Democracy
- Part IV Development Ethics, Agency, and Democracy
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics , pp. 25 - 48Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Cavalier, Robert. 2002. “Meta-Ethics, Normative Ethics, and Applied Ethics.” Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy. http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/80130/part2/II_preface.html.Google Scholar
Crocker, David A. 1991. “Toward Development Ethics.” World Development 19(5): 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, David A. 2008. Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. Characters and Events: Popular Essays in Social and Political Philosophy(Vol. I). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes. 1925. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Translated by Hicks, R. D.. Two volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dotson, Kirstie. 2013. “How Is This Paper Philosophy?” Comparative Philosophy 3(1): 3–29.Google Scholar
Dower, Nigel 2008. “The Nature and Scope of Development Ethics.” Journal of Global Ethics 10(2): 249–262.Google Scholar
Drydyk, Jay. 2011. “Development Ethics.” In Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Chatterjee, Deen (ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Drydyk, Jay. 2016. “Ethical Issues in Development.” In The Palgrave Handbook of International Development. Grugel, Jean and Hammett, Daniel (eds.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Drydyk, Jay and Keleher, Lori (eds.). 2018. Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics. New York: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 1984. “Discourse and Power in Development: Michel Foucault and the Relevance of His Work to the Third World.” Alternatives 10(3): 377–400.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esteva, Gustavo. 1985. “Development: Myth, Metaphor, Myth, Threat.” Development Seeds of Change 3: 78–79.Google Scholar
Fieser, James. n.d. “Ethics.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/.Google Scholar
Frodeman, Robert and Briggle, Adam. 2015. “Socrates Untenured.” Inside Higher Ed. January 13, 2015. www.insidehighered.com/views/2015/01/13/essay-problems-philosophy-academe.Google Scholar
Gasper, Des. 2016. “Ethics of Development.” In Introduction to International Development: Approaches, Actors, Issues, and Practices. Haslam, Paul A., Schafer, Jessica, and Beaudet, Pierre (eds.). Third edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goulet, Denis. 1977. The Crucial Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Goulet, Denis. 1995. Development Ethics: A Guide to Theory and Practice. New York: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T.. 1987. Thinking through Confucius. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1995. “‘Strong Objectivity’: A Response to the New Objectivity Question.” Synthese 104(3): 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2004. “Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site of Political, Philosophic, and Scientific Debate.” In The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Harding, Sandra (ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2017. “Focus on the Fire, Not the Spark.” Daily Nous. May 4, 2017. http://dailynous.com/2017/05/04/focus-fire-not-spark-guest-post-sally-haslanger/.Google Scholar
Irvine, Andrew David and Deutsch, Harry. 2016. “Russell’s Paradox.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Winter 2016 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/russell-paradox/.Google Scholar
Keleher, Lori. 2014. “Three and a Half Approaches to Development.” A National Endowment for the Humanities Edsitement Information Page.Google Scholar
Keleher, Lori. 2017. “Toward an Integral Human Development Ethics.” Veritas: Revista de Filosofía y Teología 37: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2000. The Road since Structure. Conant, James and Haugeland, John (eds.). The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pieper, Josef. 1992. In Defense of Philosophy: Classical Wisdom Stands Up to Modern Challenges. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 2007. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 2009. “Philosophy’s Ulterior Motives.” In Unpopular Essays. New York: Routledge (44–55).Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2014. Interview by Tim Crane (“John Searle: The Philosopher in the World”). New York Review of Books. June 20, 2014. www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/jun/20/john-searle-philosopher-world/.Google Scholar
Sengupta, Mitu. 2019. “Post Development School.” In Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics. Drydyk, Jay and Keleher, Lori (eds.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1(3): 229–243.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 2004. One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Peter. 2014. Empty Ideas: A Critique of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Ziai, Aram. 2007. “Development Discourse and Its Critics: An Introduction to Post-Development.” In Exploring Post-Development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspectives. Ziai, Aram (ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge (3–17).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziai, Aram. 2004. “The Ambivalence of Post-Development: Between Reactionary Populism and Radical Democracy.” Third World Quarterly 25(6): 1045–1060.Google Scholar
Ziai, Aram. 2013. “The Discourse of ‘Development’ and Why the Concept Should Be Abandoned.” Development in Practice 23(1): 123–136.Google Scholar