Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustration
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Bibliography
- Abbreviations
- Timeline
- Introduction
- 1 The Emergence of African Discontent
- Part One The Origins of the ACHPR
- Part Two The OAU and Human Rights
- Conclusion
- Index
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Illustrations
- Abbreviations
- Timeline
- Introduction
- Part Three The Influence of the Outsiders
- Part Four The Political Process
- Conclusion
- Appendix 1 The OAU Charter
- Appendix 2 The ACHPR
- Select Bibliography
- Index
2 - The Insiders – the Political Process of the ACHPR
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 February 2024
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustration
- Acknowledgements
- Note on Bibliography
- Abbreviations
- Timeline
- Introduction
- 1 The Emergence of African Discontent
- Part One The Origins of the ACHPR
- Part Two The OAU and Human Rights
- Conclusion
- Index
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Illustrations
- Abbreviations
- Timeline
- Introduction
- Part Three The Influence of the Outsiders
- Part Four The Political Process
- Conclusion
- Appendix 1 The OAU Charter
- Appendix 2 The ACHPR
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
As described in earlier chapters, sometime around 1977, the first tentative signs that at least some African states were prepared to consider a degree of human rights oversight had begun to emerge. In 1977 and 1978, the military government of Nigeria, with support from other African states, had sponsored resolutions in the UNGA and CHR calling for states in those regions where regional arrangements for human rights did not exist to consider putting arrangements in place and requesting the Secretary-General to extend to the OAU, ‘if it so requests’, such assistance as it may require to facilitate the establishment of an African regional human rights commission. For the first time, unlike the Nigerian-sponsored 1967 CHR resolution with which these resolutions are often bracketed, the primary consideration was no longer self-determination or apartheid but domestic governance. At the same time, following M’baye's appointment as Chairman of the CHR in 1978, there had also seemed to be a modest shift in the attitude of some African states towards acceptance of criticism of one of their number thereby opening up the prospect of limited action being taken in respect of the Sub-Commission referrals against Equatorial Guinea and Uganda. Human rights, with President Amin most specifically in mind, also emerged as a major topic of discussion at the 1977 London Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM).
The Commonwealth human rights initiative
Already in advance of the 1977 London CHOGM, a major point of concern for most member states, but especially the UK where political feelings ran high, was whether President Amin would, or should be allowed to, attend – and the corollary concern that, were he to attend, the Queen would be obliged to invite him to her Silver Jubilee celebrations which overlapped with the CHOGM. The British government therefore deliberated carefully on what steps it might take as it was well aware that CHOGMs, by tradition, did not address the internal affairs of member states. The options ranged from barring President Amin, but not a Ugandan delegation of acceptable standing, expelling or suspending Uganda from the Commonwealth and an African walk-out at the meeting. As the due date neared, and it was feared that President Amin would after all force himself on the UK, arrangements were also made to divert his plane to Scotland or to detain him until he agreed to leave.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The African Charter on Human and Peoples' RightsVolume 1: Political, Intellectual and Cultural Origins, pp. 191 - 286Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2023