Flexner, A. Medical education in the United States and Canada. From the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin Number Four, 1910. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(7):594–602.Google Scholar

Frenk, J, Chen, L, Bhutta, ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–1958. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manyazewal, T. Using the World Health Organization health system building blocks through survey of healthcare professionals to determine the performance of public healthcare facilities. Arch Public Health. 2017;75:50. doi:10.1186/s13690-017-0221-9Google Scholar

A statement on abortion by one hundred professors of obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112(7):992–998. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(72)90826-5Google Scholar

Federal Support for Graduate Medical Education: An Overview. Congressional Research Service; 2018. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44376.pdf.Google Scholar

ABMS | American Board of Medical Specialties. www.abms.org. Accessed April 4, 2020.Google Scholar

Ryan, KJ. Historical Perspective, 1972–73 Revisited. In Conference on Impact of Subspecialization on Residency Training and Practice of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Chicago, IL: The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 1991:3–4.Google Scholar

Creinin, MD, Darney, PD. Methotrexate and misoprostol for early abortion. Contraception. 1993;48(4):339–348. doi:10.1016/0010-7824(93)90079-mCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, AB, Greenberg, MB, Darney, PD. Misoprostol and pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(1):38–47. doi:10.1056/NEJM200101043440107Google Scholar

ABOG. www.abog.org. Accessed April 4, 2020.Google Scholar

ACGME Home. www.acgme.org. Accessed April 4, 2020.Google Scholar

Committees and Members Selection Process. www.acgme.org/About-Us/Committees-and-Members-Selection-Process. Accessed April 4, 2020.Google Scholar

Fellowship in Complex Family Planning Advisory Board. Guide to Learning in Complex Family Planning. 2019.Google Scholar

Fellowship in Complex Family Planning. General Requirements for a Post-Graduate Program in the Subspecialty Area of Complex Family Planning. 2019.Google Scholar

Zeldovich, VB, Rocca, CH, Langton, C, Landy, U, Ly, E, Freedman, L. Abortion policies in United States teaching hospitals: formal and informal parameters beyond the law. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(6):1296–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138196/. Accessed April 4, 2020.Google Scholar

Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.Google Scholar

Landy, U. Medical education in family planning in the United States: why and how. Poster presented at Cape Town, South Africa; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zieman, M, Hatcher, RA, Allen, AZ, Lathrop, E, Haddad, L. Managing Contraception: For Your Pocket. 15th ed. Managing Contraception, LLC; 2018.Google Scholar

Morse, JE, Rowen, TS, Steinauer, J, Byamugisha, J, Kakaire, O. A qualitative assessment of Ugandan women’s perceptions and knowledge of contraception. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(1):30–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.014Google Scholar

Lester, F, Kakaire, O, Byamugisha, J, et al. Intracesarean insertion of the copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception. 2015;91(3):198–203. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.002Google Scholar

Kakaire, O, Byamugisha, JK, Tumwesigye, NM, Gemzell-Danielsson, K. Clinical versus laboratory screening for sexually transmitted infections prior to insertion of intrauterine contraception among women living with HIV/AIDS: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2015;30(7):1573–1579. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Averbach, S, Kakaire, O, McDiehl, R, Dehlendorf, C, Lester, F, Steinauer, J. The effect of immediate postpartum levonorgestrel contraceptive implant use on breastfeeding and infant growth: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2019;99(2):87–93. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.10.008Google Scholar

Averbach, S, Kakaire, O, Kayiga, H, et al. Immediate versus delayed postpartum use of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants: a randomized controlled trial in Uganda. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):568.e1–568.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.005Google Scholar

Lemani, C, Tang, JH, Kopp, D, et al. Contraceptive uptake after training community health workers in couples counseling: a cluster randomized trial. PloS One. 2017;12(4):e0175879. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lemani, C, Kamtuwanje, N, Phiri, B, et al. Effect of family planning interventions on couple years of protection in Malawi. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;141(1):37-44. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tang, JH, Kaliti, C, Bengtson, A, et al. Improvement and retention of emergency obstetrics and neonatal care knowledge and skills in a hospital mentorship program in Lilongwe, Malawi. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(2):240–243. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.062Google Scholar

Krashin, JW, Lemani, C, Nkambule, J, et al. A comparison of breastfeeding exclusivity and duration rates between immediate postpartum levonorgestrel versus etonogestrel implant users: a prospective cohort study. Breastfeed Med. 2019;14(1):69–76. doi:10.1089/bfm.2018.0165Google Scholar

Krashin, JW, Haddad, LB, Tweya, H, et al. Factors associated with desired fertility among HIV-positive women and men attending two urban clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi. PloS One. 2018;13(6):e0198798. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chinula, L, Nelson, JAE, Wiener, J, et al. Effect of the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable and levonorgestrel implant on HIV genital shedding: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2018;98(3):193–198. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chinula, L, Hicks, M, Chiudzu, G, et al. A tailored approach to building specialized surgical oncology capacity: early experiences and outcomes in Malawi. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018;26:60–65. doi:10.1016/j.gore.2018.10.001Google Scholar

Gausi, B, Chagomerana, MB, Tang, JH, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus serodiscordance and dual contraceptive method use among human immunodeficiency virus-infected men and women in Lilongwe, Malawi. Sex Transm Dis. 2018;45(11):747–753. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000868Google Scholar

Mbichila, TH, Chagomerana, M, Tang, JH, et al. Partnership duration and HIV serodisclosure among people living with HIV/AIDS in Lilongwe, Malawi. Int J STD AIDS. 2018;29(10):987–993. doi:10.1177/0956462418769730CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bula, A, Kopp, DM, Maman, S, Chinula, L, Tsidya, M, Tang, JH. Family planning knowledge, experiences and reproductive desires among women who had experienced a poor obstetric outcome in Lilongwe Malawi: a qualitative study. Contracept Reprod Med. 2018;3:22. doi:10.1186/s40834-018-0075-8Google Scholar

Mwafulirwa, T, O’Shea, MS, Hamela, G, et al. Family planning providers’ experiences and perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception in Lilongwe, Malawi. Afr J Reprod Health. 2016;20(2):62–71. doi:10.29063/ajrh2016/v20i2.7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bernard, C, Pekny, C, Omukagah, CO, et al. Integration of contraceptive services into anticoagulation management services improves access to long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2018;98(6):486–491. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.139Google Scholar

Patel, RC, Jakait, B, Thomas, K, et al. Increasing body mass index or weight does not appear to influence the association between efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy and implant effectiveness among HIV-positive women in western Kenya. Contraception. 2019;100(4):288–295. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2019.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, C, Jakait, B, Fadel, W, et al. Preferences for multipurpose technology and alternative methods of antiretroviral therapy among women living with HIV in western Kenya. Poster presented at Mexico City, Mexico; 2019.Google Scholar

Negussie, D, Bekele, D, Curran, D, et al. Ethiopian and American collaboration: process, accomplishments, and lessons learned. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):703–708. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003705Google Scholar

Truong, M, Wood, SY. Unconscionable: When Providers Deny Abortion Care. International Women’s Health Coalition; 2018. https://31u5ac2nrwj6247cya153vw9-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IWHC_CO_Report-Web_single_pg.pdf.Google Scholar

Stifani, BM, Couto, M, Lopez, Gomez A. From harm reduction to legalization: the Uruguayan model for safe abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 4):45–51. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12677Google Scholar

The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. New York: United Nations; 2015:75. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Products/Progress2015/English2015.pdf.Google Scholar

Arulkumaran, S, Hediger, V, Manor, A, May, J. Saving Mothers’ Lives: Transforming Strategy into Action.  Imperial College, London: Global Health Policy Summit, Report of the Maternal Health Working Group; 2012:19.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Chang, R, Thiel de Bocanegra, H. The impact of postpartum contraception on reducing preterm birth: findings from California. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):703.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

White, K, Teal, SB, Potter, JE. Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1471–1477.Google Scholar

McDorman, M, Declercq, E, Cabral, H, Morton, C. Recent Increases in the US maternal mortality rate: disentangling trends from measurement issues. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:447–553.Google Scholar

Moaddab, A, Dildy, G, Brown, H, et al. Racial differences in maternal mortality in the USA. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(4):707–712.Google Scholar

Joseph, K, Lisonkova, M, Giulia, M, et al. Factors underlying the temporal increase in maternal mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):91–100.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Bunch, K, Tuffnell, D, et al. (Eds.), on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2014–16. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2018. www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-ukGoogle Scholar

Womersley, K. Why giving birth is safer in Britain than in the U.S. ProPublica; August 31, 2017.Google Scholar

Terplan, M. Women and the opioid crisis: historical context and public health solutions. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:195–196.Google Scholar

Petersen, EE, Davis, NL, Goodman, D, et al. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:423–429. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6818e1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chescheir, N. Drilling down on maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:427–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Addante, A, Eisenberg, D, Leonard, J, Hoofnagle, M. The association of restricted abortion access and increasing rates of maternal mortality in the United States. Contraception. 2019;100:306.Google Scholar

Yifru, B. National Maternal Death Surveillance and Response (MDSR) Annual Report, 2010 EFY. Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Public Health Emergency Management System (PHEMS); 2011.Google Scholar

Yifru, B. Abortion-related mortality in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014;24(Suppl 0):15–28.Google Scholar

Pathak, LR, Malla, DS, Pradhan, A. Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Study. Kathmandu: Ministry of Health; 1998.Google Scholar

Samandari, G, Wolf, M, Basnett, I, Hyman, A, Anderson, C. Implementation of legal abortion in Nepal: a model for rapid scale up of high-quality care. Reprod Health. 2012;9:7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abortion Task Force. Workshop Report – National Implementation Plan for Abortion Services. Kathmandu: Ministry of Health, Department of Health Services, Family Health Division; November 18–19, 2002.Google Scholar

Henderson, JT, Puri, M, Blum, M, et al. Effects of abortion legalization in Nepal, 2001–2010. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64775.Google Scholar

Tamang, A, Puri, M, Lama, K, Shrestha, P. Pharmacy workers in Nepal can provide the correct information about using mifepristone and misoprostol to women seeking medication to induce abortion. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;(Suppl 44):104–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rocca, CH, Puri, M. Shrestha, P, et al. Effectiveness and safety of early medication abortion provided in pharmacies by auxiliary nurse-midwives: a non-inferiority study in Nepal. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191174. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191174Google Scholar

Darney, P, Nakamura, C, Regan, L, Surur, F, Thapa, K. Maternal mortality in the USA compared to Ethiopia, Nepal, Brazil and UK: contrasts in reproductive health policies. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:1–6.Google Scholar

Martin, N, Montagne, R. The last person you’d expect to die in childbirth. ProPublica; May 12, 2017. www.propublica.org/article/die-in-childbirth-maternal-death-rate-health-care-systemGoogle Scholar

Veklerov, K. How California learned to keep pregnant women, new moms from dying. San Francisco Chronicle; September 4, 2018. www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/How-California-learned-to-keep-pregnant-women-and-13204352.phpGoogle Scholar

Moaddab, A, Dildy, GA, Brown, HL, et al. Health care disparity and pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2005–2014. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(4):707–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henderson, JT, Puri, M, Blum, M, et al. Effects of abortion legalization in Nepal, 2001–2010. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64775.Google Scholar

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar

Greenhouse, L, Siegel, R. Before Roe v. Wade: Voices That Shaped the Abortion Debate before the Supreme Court’s Ruling. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2012. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2131505Google Scholar

Gold, RB. Lessons from before Roe: will past be prologue? Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2003;(5):1–4.Google Scholar

Tietze, C, Lewit, S. Joint Program for the Study of Abortion (JPSA): early medical complications of legal abortion. Stud Fam Plann. 1972;3(6):97–122. doi:10.2307/1965375CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A statement on abortion by one hundred professors of obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112(7):992–998. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(72)90826-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewit, S. Abortion Techniques and Services. Amsterdam: Excerpta medica; 1972. http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:000382479Google Scholar

Hodgson, JE, ed. Abortion and Sterilization. London: Academic Press; 1981. www.elsevier.com/books/abortion-and-sterilization/hodgson/978-0-12-792030-6. Accessed March 31, 2020.Google Scholar

Schoen, J. Living through some giant change: the establishment of abortion services. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):416–425. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301173Google Scholar

Landy, U, Lewit, S. Administrative, counseling and medical practices in National Abortion Federation facilities. Fam Plann Perspect. 1982;14(5):257–262.Google Scholar

Burkman, RT, King, TM, Burnett, LS, Atienza, MF. University abortion programs: one year later. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;119(1):131–136. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(74)90327-5Google Scholar

Donovan, MK. In Real Life: Federal Restrictions on Abortion Coverage and the Women They Impact. Washington, DC: Guttmacher Institute; 2017:7. www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/gpr2000116.pdfGoogle Scholar

Freedman, L, Langton, C, Landy, U, Ly, E, Rocca, C. Abortion care policies and enforcement in U.S. obstetrics–gynecology teaching hospitals: a national survey. Contraception. 2017;96(4):265. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.017Google Scholar

Jones, RK, Jerman, J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;49(1):17–27. doi:10.1363/psrh.12015Google Scholar

Zekman, P. The abortion profiteers. Chicago Sun-Times; November 12, 1978. http://dlib.nyu.edu/undercover/abortion-profiteers-pamela-zekman-pamela-warrick-chicago-sun-times. Accessed March 31, 2020.Google Scholar

Clendinen, D. Abortion clinic bombings have caused disruption for many. New York Times; February 6, 1985:14.Google Scholar

Grimes, DA, Forrest, JD, Kirkman, AL, Radford, B. An epidemic of antiabortion violence in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(5 Pt 1):1263–1268. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90346-sCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grimes, DA. Clinicians who provide abortions: the thinning ranks. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(4):719–723.Google ScholarPubMed

Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 612: abortion training and education. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(5):1055–1059. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000456327.96480.18Google Scholar

Herbitter, C, Bennett, A, Schubert, FD, Bennett, IM, Gold, M. Management of early pregnancy failure and induced abortion by family medicine educators. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(6):751–758. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2013.06.120248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

AAFP Home | American Academy of Family Physicians. www.aafp.org/home.html. Accessed April 3, 2020.Google Scholar

Wessell, NY. The triad of medicine. N Engl J Med. 1957;257(13):603–605. doi:10.1056/NEJM195709262571305Google Scholar

Fellowship in Family Planning National Office, 2019 Program Data.Google Scholar

Kenneth J. Ryan Residency Training Program in Family Planning and Abortion National Office, 2019 Program Data.Google Scholar

Landy, U. Is family planning a subspecialty of obstetrics and gynecology? Contraception. 2005;72(6):399–401. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.08.017Google Scholar

Lathrop, E, Landy, U. The Fellowship in Family Planning. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;121(1):10–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.005Google Scholar

Schulz, KF, Grimes, DA. The Lancet Handbook of Essential Concepts in Clinical Research. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006.Google Scholar

The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research; 1979. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html#.Google Scholar

Papaya Workshop. About Papaya Workshop. http://papayaworkshop.org/. Accessed April 3, 2020.Google Scholar

ACGME. Accreditation Data System (ADS). https://apps.acgme.org/ads/Public/Reports/Report/3. Accessed April 3, 2020.Google Scholar

Zeldovich, VB, Rocca, CH, Langton, C, Landy, U, Ly, E, Freedman, L. Abortion policies in United States teaching hospitals: formal and informal parameters beyond the law. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(6):1296–1305. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003876Google Scholar

Steinauer, J, Dehlendorf, C, Grumbach, K, Landy, U, Darney, P. Multi-specialty family planning training: collaborating to meet the needs of women. Contraception. 2012;86(3):188–190. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.12.001Google Scholar

Guiahi, M, Westover, C, Lim, S, Westhoff, CL. The New York City mayoral abortion training initiative at public hospitals. Contraception. 2012;86(5):577–582. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.02.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guiahi, M, Lim, S, Westover, C, Gold, M, Westhoff, CL. Enablers of and barriers to abortion training. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(2):238–243. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00067.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fellowship in Complex Family Planning. General Requirements for a Post-Graduate Program in the Subspecialty Area of Complex Family Planning. 2019.Google Scholar

Reagan, LJ. When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867–1973. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997.Google Scholar

Mohr, JC. Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy. Oxford University Press; 1978.Google Scholar

Luker, K. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984.Google Scholar

Potts, M, Diggory, P, Peel, J. Abortion. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1977.Google Scholar

Joffe, C. Doctors of Conscience. Boston: Beacon Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Grimes, D. Every Third Woman in America: How Legal Abortion Transformed Our Nation. Carolina Beach, NC: Daymark; 2014.Google Scholar

Joffe, C. Physician provision of abortion before Roe v. Wade. Res Sociol Health Care. 1991;9:21–32.Google Scholar

Cates, W, Rochat, RW, Grimes, DA, Tyler, CW. Legalized abortion: effect on national trends of maternal and abortion-related mortality (1940 through 1976). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(2):211–214. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(78)90926-2Google Scholar

Fathalla, MF, Sinding, SW, Rosenfield, A, Fathalla, MMF. Sexual and reproductive health for all: a call for action. Lancet. 2006;368(9552):2095–2100. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69483-XGoogle Scholar

Garrow, DJ. Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998.Google Scholar

Dynak, H, Weitz, T, Joffe, C, Stewart, F, Arons, A. Honoring San Francisco’s Abortion Pinoeers. San Francisco: UCSF Center for Reproductive Health Reseach & Policy; The Regents of the University of California; 2003.Google Scholar

Leavy, Z, Kummer, JM. Criminal abortion: human hardship and unyielding laws. South Calif Law Rev. 1962;35(123):24.Google Scholar

Stewart, GK, Goldstein, PJ. Therapeutic abortion in California. Effects of septic abortion and maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1971;37(4):510–514.Google Scholar

Goldstein, P, Stewart, G. Trends in therapeutic abortion in San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 1972;62(5):695–699. doi:10.2105/AJPH.62.5.695Google Scholar

Arulkumaran, S, Hediger, V, Manzoor, A, May, J. Saving Mothers’ Lives: Transforming Strategy into Action. Global Health Policy Summit, Report of the Maternal Health Working Group. London: Imperial College; 2012.Google Scholar

Guttmacher, AF. Abortion: odyssey of an attitude. Fam Plann Perspect. 1973;4:10–14.Google Scholar

Zatuchni, GI, Sciarra, JJ, Speidel, JJ, eds. Pregnancy Termination: Procedures, Safety, and New Developments. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row; 1979.Google Scholar

Margolis, AJ, Overstreet, EW. Legal abortion without hospitalization. Obstet Gynecol. 1970;36(3):479–481.Google Scholar

A statement on abortion by one hundred professors of obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112(7):992–998. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(72)90826-5Google Scholar

Darney, PD, Training physicians in elective abortion technique in the United States. In Landy, U, Ratnam, SS (Eds.), Prevention and Treatment of Contraceptive Failure: In Honor of Christopher Tietze. New York: Plenum Press; 1986: 133–147.Google Scholar

Ryan, KJ. Abortion or motherhood, suicide and madness. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(4):1029–1036. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90587-0Google Scholar

Freedman, L. Willing and Unable: Doctors’ Constraints in Abortion Care. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press; 2010.Google Scholar

Freedman, L, Landy, U, Darney, P, Steinauer, J. Obstacles to the integration of abortion into obstetrics and gynecology practice. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;42(3):146–151. doi:10.1363/4214610Google Scholar

Blackwell, S, Louis, JM, Norton, ME, et al. Reproductive services for women at high risk for maternal mortality: a report of the workshop of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Fellowship in Family Planning, and the Society of Family Planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4):B2–B18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.008Google Scholar

Zeldovich, VB, Rocca, CH, Langton, C, Landy, U, Ly, E, Freedman, L. Abortion policies in United States teaching hospitals: formal and informal parameters beyond the law. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1296–1305. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003876CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarification on Requirements Regarding Family Planning and Contraception Review Committee for Obstetrics and Gynecology. www.acgme.org/portals/0/pfassets/programresources/220_obgyn_abortion_training_clarification.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2019.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. College Statement of Policy. Abortion Policy. November 2014. www.acog.org/clinical-information/policy-and-position-statements/statements-of-policy/2017/abortion-policyGoogle Scholar

Association of American Medical Colleges. Accredited Medical Education Programs in the U.S. February 26, 2020. www.printfriendly.com/p/g/gK5Aec. Accessed April 8, 2020.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Facts Are Important. Abortion Is Health Care. www.acog.org/-/media/Departments/Government-Relations-and-Outreach/FactsAreImportantABisHC.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20190803T1459203762. Accessed August 3, 2019.Google Scholar

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Care Services, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S. The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2018. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507236/. Accessed March 30, 2020.Google Scholar

Norris, A, Bessett, D, Steinberg, JR, Kavanaugh, ML, De Zordo, S, Becker, D. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(3 Suppl):S49–S54. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010Google Scholar

Debbink, MLP, Hassinger, JA, Martin, LA, Maniere, E, Youatt, E, Harris, LH. Experiences with the Providers Share Workshop method: abortion worker support and research in tandem. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1823–1837. doi:10.1177/1049732316661166Google Scholar

Parikh, LI, Benner, RS, Riggs, TW, Hazen, N, Chescheir, NC. Subspecialty influence on scientific peer review for an obstetrics and gynecology journal with a high impact factor. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(2):243–248. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001852Google Scholar

Espey, E, Dennis, A, Landy, U. The importance of access to comprehensive reproductive health care, including abortion: a statement from women’s health professional organizations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):67–70. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.008Google Scholar

One Hundred Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology. A statement on abortion by 100 professors of obstetrics: 40 years later. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(3):193–199. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.007Google Scholar

Cohen, DS, Joffe, C. Obstacle Course. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2020.Google Scholar

Lave, J, Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.Google Scholar

Barab, SA, Barnett, M, Squire, K. Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: characterizing the essential tensions. J Learn Sci. 2002;11(4):489–542.Google Scholar

Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mody, SK, Kiley, J, Gawron, L, Garcia, P, Hammond, C. Team-based learning: a novel approach to medical student education in family planning. Contraception. 2013;88(2):239–242.Google Scholar

Steinauer, J, Preskil, F, Devaskar, S, Landy, U, Darney, P. The Papaya Workshop: using the papaya to teach intrauterine gynecologic procedures. MedEdPORTAL. 2013.Google Scholar

Steinauer, J, Hawkins, M, Preskill, F, Koenemann, K, Dehlendorf, C. Caring for Challenging Patients Workshop. MedEdPORTAL. 2014.Google Scholar

Espey, E, Ogburn, T, Chavez, A, Qualls, C, Leyba, M. Abortion education in medical schools: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):640–643.Google Scholar

Advocacy Essentials: Reproductive Rights, Health, and Justice. 2018.Google Scholar

Curtis, KM, Jatlaoui, TC, Tepper, NK, et al. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(4):1–66.Google Scholar

Fort, DG, Herr, TM, Shaw, PL, Gutzman, KE, Starren, JB. Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research. J Clin Transl Sci. 2017;1(1):60–66.Google Scholar

Berwick, DM, Nolan, TW, Whittington, J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–769.Google Scholar

Sackett, DL, Rosenberg, WM, Gray, JA, Haynes, RB, Richardson, WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:3–5.Google Scholar

Sackett, DL, Rosenberg, WM. The need for evidence-based medicine. J R Soc Med. 1995;88(11):620–624.Google Scholar

Straus, SE, Glasziou, P, Richardson, S, Haynes, RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2018.Google Scholar

Cook, RJ, Dickens, BM. Reducing stigma in reproductive health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):89–92.Google Scholar

Cook, RJ, Cusack, S, Dickens, BM. Unethical female stereotyping in reproductive health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(3):255–258.Google Scholar

Norris, A, Bessett, D, Steinberg, JR, Kavanaugh, ML, De Zordo, S, Becker, D. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(3 Suppl):S49–S54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Geibel, S, Hossain, SM, Pulerwitz, J, et al. Stigma reduction training improves healthcare provider attitudes toward, and experiences of, young marginalized people in Bangladesh. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60(2S2):S35–S44.Google Scholar

Guiahi, M, Davis, A. First-trimester abortion in women with medical conditions: release date October 2012 SFP Guideline #20122. Contraception. 2012;86(6):622–630.Google Scholar

Diedrich, J, Drey, E. Induction of fetal demise before abortion. Contraception. 2010;81(6):462–473.Google Scholar

Roe, AH, Bartz, D. Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: contraception after surgical abortion. Contraception. 2019;99(1):2–9.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 143: medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):676–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerns, J, Steinauer, J. Management of postabortion hemorrhage: release date November 2012 SFP Guideline #20131. Contraception. 2013;87(3):331–342.Google Scholar

Newmann, S, Dalve-Endres, A, Drey, EA. Clinical guidelines. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Contraception. 2008;77(4):308–314.Google Scholar

Lohr, PA, Lyus, R, Prager, S. Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Contraception. 2017;95(6):529–537.Google Scholar

Levy, BS, Ness, DL, Weinberger, SE. Consensus guidelines for facilities performing outpatient procedures: evidence over ideology. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):255–260.Google Scholar

Allen, RH, Singh, R. Society of Family Planning clinical guidelines pain control in surgical abortion part 1 – local anesthesia and minimal sedation. Contraception. 2018;97(6):471–477.Google Scholar

Han, L, Padua, E, Hart, KD, Edelman, A, Jensen, JT. Comparing cervical mucus changes in response to an oral progestin or oestrogen withdrawal in ovarian-suppressed women: a clinical pilot. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24(3):209–215.Google Scholar

Han, L, Padua, E, Edelman, A, Jensen, JT. Appraising cervical mucus: a new approach to evaluating contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018;23(1):78–83.Google Scholar

Han, L, Taub, R, Jensen, JT. Cervical mucus and contraception: what we know and what we don’t. Contraception. 2017;96(5):310–321.Google Scholar

Patil, E, Thurmond, A, Edelman, A, et al. Pressure dynamics in the non-gravid uterus: intrauterine pressure cannot confirm tubal occlusion after non-surgical permanent contraception. Contraception. 2017;96(5):330–35.Google Scholar

Jensen, JT, Hanna, C, Yao, S, Thompson, E, Bauer, C, Slayden, OD. Transcervical administration of polidocanol foam prevents pregnancy in female baboons. Contraception. 2016;94(5):527–533.Google Scholar

Slayden, OD, Lee, DO, Yao, S, Jensen, JT. Polidocanol induced tubal occlusion in nonhuman primates: immunohistochemical detection of collagen I-V. Contraception. 2016;94(5):521–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, JT, Hanna, C, Yao, S, Bauer, C, Morgan, TK, Slayden, OD. Characterization of tubal occlusion after transcervical polidocanol foam (PF) infusion in baboons. Contraception. 2015;92(2):96–102.Google Scholar

Jensen, JT, Hanna, C, Yao, S, et al. Blockade of tubal patency following transcervical administration of polidocanol foam: initial studies in rhesus macaques. Contraception. 2014;89(6):540–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, JT, Rodriguez, MI, Liechtenstein-Zabrak, J, Zalanyi, S. Transcervical polidocanol as a nonsurgical method of female sterilization: a pilot study. Contraception. 2004;70(2):111–115.Google Scholar

Luo, D, Westhoff, CL, Edelman, AB, Natavio, M, Stanczyk, FZ, Jusko, WJ. Altered pharmacokinetics of combined oral contraceptives in obesity – multistudy assessment. Contraception. 2019;99(4):256–263.Google Scholar

Edelman, A, Trussell, J, Aiken, ARA, Portman, DJ, Chiodo, JA, 3rd, Garner, EIO. The emerging role of obesity in short-acting hormonal contraceptive effectiveness. Contraception. 2018;97(5):371–377.Google Scholar

Edelman, AB, Cherala, G, Blue, SW, Erikson, DW, Jensen, JT. Impact of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel-based emergency contraception: single and double dosing. Contraception. 2016;94(1):52–57.Google Scholar

Edelman, AB, Cherala, G, Munar, MY, McInnis, M, Stanczyk, FZ, Jensen, JT. Correcting oral contraceptive pharmacokinetic alterations due to obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014;90(5):550–556.Google Scholar

Lazorwitz, A, Aquilante, CL, Oreschak, K, Sheeder, J, Guiahi, M, Teal, S. Influence of genetic variants on steady-state etonogestrel concentrations among contraceptive implant users. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):783–794.Google Scholar

Renner, RM, Edelman, AB, Nichols, MD, Jensen, JT, Lim, JY, Bednarek, PH. Refining paracervical block techniques for pain control in first trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Contraception. 2016;94(5):461–466.Google Scholar

Allen, RH, Fortin, J, Bartz, D, Goldberg, AB, Clark, MA. Women’s preferences for pain control during first-trimester surgical abortion: a qualitative study. Contraception. 2012;85(4):413–418.Google Scholar

Romero, I, Turok, D, Gilliam, M. A randomized trial of tramadol versus ibuprofen as an adjunct to pain control during vacuum aspiration abortion. Contraception. 2008;77(1):56–59.Google Scholar

Dragoman, MV, Grossman, D, Kapp, N, et al. Two prophylactic medication approaches in addition to a pain control regimen for early medical abortion < 63 days’ gestation with mifepristone and misoprostol: study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):132.Google Scholar

Conti, JA, Lerma, K, Shaw, KA, Blumenthal, PD. Self-administered lidocaine gel for pain control with first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(2):297–303.Google Scholar

Carr, S, Espey, E. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4 Suppl):S22–S28.Google Scholar

Bryant, AG, Kamanga, G, Stuart, GS, Haddad, LB, Meguid, T, Mhango, C. Immediate postpartum versus 6-week postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial. Afr J Reprod Health. 2013;17(2):72–79.Google Scholar

Chen, BA, Reeves, MF, Creinin, MD, Schwarz, EB. Postplacental or delayed levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion and breast-feeding duration. Contraception. 2011;84(5):499–504.Google Scholar

Wolfe, KK, Wilson, MD, Hou, MY, Creinin, MD. An updated assessment of postpartum sterilization fulfillment after vaginal delivery. Contraception. 2017;96(1):41–46.Google Scholar

Zite, N, Wuellner, S, Gilliam, M. Failure to obtain desired postpartum sterilization: risk and predictors. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):794–799.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Seuc, A, Sokal, DC. Comparative efficacy of postpartum sterilisation with the titanium clip versus partial salpingectomy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2013;120(1):108–112.Google Scholar

Dilley, SE, Havrilesky, LJ, Bakkum-Gamez, J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146(2):373–379.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Darney, BG, Elman, E, Linz, R, Caughey, AB, McConnell, KJ. Examining quality of contraceptive services for adolescents in Oregon’s family planning program. Contraception. 2015;91(4):328–335.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Chang, R, Thiel de Bocanegra, H. The impact of postpartum contraception on reducing preterm birth: findings from California. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):703 e1–e6.Google Scholar

Krashin, JW, Edelman, AB, Nichols, MD, Allen, AJ, Caughey, AB, Rodriguez, MI. Prohibiting consent: what are the costs of denying permanent contraception concurrent with abortion care? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):76e1–e10.Google Scholar

Burlone, S, Edelman, AB, Caughey, AB, Trussell, J, Dantas, S, Rodriguez, MI. Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds. Contraception. 2013;87(2):143–148.Google Scholar

Jarlenski, M, Borrero, S, La Charite, T, Zite, NB. Episode-based payment for perinatal care in medicaid: implications for practice and policy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):1080–1084.Google Scholar

Zite, N, Wuellner, S, Gilliam, M. Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization. Contraception. 2006;73(4):404.Google Scholar

Gilliam, ML, Neustadt, A, Gordon, R. A call to incorporate a reproductive justice agenda into reproductive health clinical practice and policy. Contraception. 2009;79(4):243–246.Google Scholar

Hatcher, RA. Contraceptive Technology. 21st ed. New York: Ardent Media; 2018: xxx.Google Scholar

Hubacher, D, Grimes, DA. Noncontraceptive health benefits of intrauterine devices: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57(2):120–128.Google Scholar

Hubacher, D, Kavanaugh, M. Historical record-setting trends in IUD use in the United States. Contraception. 2018;98(6):467–470.Google Scholar

Hubacher, D, Finer, LB, Espey, E. Renewed interest in intrauterine contraception in the United States: evidence and explanation. Contraception. 2011;83(4):291–294.Google Scholar

MacIsaac, L, Espey, E. Intrauterine contraception: the pendulum swings back. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34(1):91–111, ix.Google Scholar

Kavanaugh, ML, Jerman, J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception. 2018;97(1):14–21.Google Scholar

Secura, GM, Allsworth, JE, Madden, T, Mullersman, JL, Peipert, JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(2):115 e1–e7.Google Scholar

McNicholas, C, Madden, T, Secura, G, Peipert, JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project round up: what we did and what we learned. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(4):635–643.Google Scholar

O’Neil-Callahan, M, Peipert, JF, Zhao, Q, Madden, T, Secura, G. Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1083–1091.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Evans, M, Espey, E. Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost. Contraception. 2014;90(5):468–471.Google Scholar

Teal, SB. Postpartum contraception: optimizing interpregnancy intervals. Contraception. 2014;89(6):487–488.Google Scholar

Han, L, Teal, SB, Sheeder, J, Tocce, K. Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):24 e1–e7.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Jensen, JT, Darney, PD, Little, SE, Caughey, AB. The financial effects of expanding postpartum contraception for new immigrants. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):552–558.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Caughey, AB, Edelman, A, Darney, PD, Foster, DG. Cost-benefit analysis of state- and hospital-funded postpartum intrauterine contraception at a university hospital for recent immigrants to the United States. Contraception. 2010;81(4):304–308.Google Scholar

Gemmill, A, Lindberg, LD. Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):64–71.Google Scholar

Ball, SJ, Pereira, G, Jacoby, P, de Klerk, N, Stanley, FJ. Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother. BMJ. 2014;349:g4333.Google Scholar

White, K, Teal, SB, Potter, JE. Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1471–1477.Google Scholar

Gurney, EP, Sonalkar, S, McAllister, A, Sammel, MD, Schreiber, CA. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):183 e1–e9.Google Scholar

Whitaker, AK, Endres, LK, Mistretta, SQ, Gilliam, ML. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014;89(6):534–539.Google Scholar

Jatlaoui, TC, Marcus, M, Jamieson, DJ, Goedken, P, Cwiak, C. Postplacental intrauterine device insertion at a teaching hospital. Contraception. 2014;89(6):528-33.Google Scholar

Prager, S, Gupta, P, Chilambwe, J, et al. Feasibility of training Zambian nurse-midwives to perform postplacental and postpartum insertions of intrauterine devices. Intl J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(3):243–247.Google Scholar

Chen, BA, Reeves, MF, Hayes, JL, Hohmann, HL, Perriera, LK, Creinin, MD. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1079–1087.Google Scholar

Hayes, JL, Cwiak, C, Goedken, P, Zieman, M. A pilot clinical trial of ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Contraception. 2007;76(4):292–296.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Edelman, A, Wallace, N, Jensen, JT. Denying postpartum sterilization to women with Emergency Medicaid does not reduce hospital charges. Contraception. 2008;78(3):232–236.Google Scholar

Dehlendorf, C, Rodriguez, MI, Levy, K, Borrero, S, Steinauer, J. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):214–220.Google Scholar

DuBard, CA, Massing, MW. Trends in emergency Medicaid expenditures for recent and undocumented immigrants. JAMA. 2007;297(10):1085–1092.Google Scholar

Swartz, JJ, Hainmueller, J, Lawrence, D, Rodriguez, MI. Expanding prenatal care to unauthorized immigrant women reduces infant mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):938–945.Google Scholar

Swartz, JJ, Hainmueller, J, Lawrence, D, Rodriguez, MI. Oregon’s expansion of prenatal care improved utilization among immigrant women. Matern Child Health J. 2019;23(2):173–182.Google Scholar

Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar

Calonge, BN, Gayle, HD. The safety and quality of abortion services in the United States: what does the evidence indicate? Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(12):878–880.Google Scholar

Goldberg, AB, Fortin, JA, Drey, EA, et al. Cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation using adjunctive misoprostol or mifepristone compared with overnight osmotic dilators alone: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):599–609.Google Scholar

Shaw, KA, Shaw, JG, Hugin, M, Velasquez, G, Hopkins, FW, Blumenthal, PD. Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015;91(4):313–319.Google Scholar

Drey, EA, Benson, LS, Sokoloff, A, Steinauer, JE, Roy, G, Jackson, RA. Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21–23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014;89(4):307–313.Google Scholar

Newmann, SJ, Dalve-Endres, A, Diedrich, JT, Steinauer, JE, Meckstroth, K, Drey, EA. Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(8):CD007310.Google Scholar

MacIsaac, L, Grossman, D, Balistreri, E, Darney, P. A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):766–770.Google Scholar

Goldberg, AB, Drey, EA, Whitaker, AK, Kang, MS, Meckstroth, KR, Darney, PD. Misoprostol compared with laminaria before early second-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(2):234–241.Google Scholar

Shaw, KA, Shaw, JG, Hugin, M, Velasquez, G, Hopkins, FW, Blumenthal, PD. Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015;91(4):313–319.Google Scholar

Jackson, R, Teplin, V, Drey, E, Thomas, L, Darney, P. Digoxin to facilitate late second-trimester abortion: a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(3):471–476.Google Scholar

Edelman, AB, Buckmaster, JG, Goetsch, MF, Nichols, MD, Jensen, JT. Cervical preparation using laminaria with adjunctive buccal misoprostol before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(2):425–430.Google Scholar

Casey, FE, Ye, PP, Perritt, JD, Moreno-Ruiz, NL, Reeves, MF. A randomized controlled trial evaluating same-day mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2016;94(2):127–133.Google Scholar

Shaw, KA, Topp, NJ, Shaw, JG, Blumenthal, PD. Mifepristone-misoprostol dosing interval and effect on induction abortion times: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(6):1335–1347.Google Scholar

Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 612: abortion training and education. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(5):1055–1059. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000456327.96480.18Google Scholar

Steinauer, JE, Turk, JK, Pomerantz, T, Simonson, K, Learman, LA, Landy, U. Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):86.e1–86.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.011Google Scholar

Steinauer, JE, Turk, JK, Fulton, MC, Simonson, KH, Landy, U. The benefits of family planning training: a 10-year review of the Ryan Residency Training Program. Contraception. 2013;88(2):275–280. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.006Google Scholar

Fellowship in Family Planning National Office, 2019 Program Data.Google Scholar

Miller, RA. Evaluation of the Family Planning Fellowship. Oakland: Public Health Institute; 2006:89.Google Scholar

Renner, R-M, Nichols, MD, Jensen, JT, Li, H, Edelman, AB. Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(5):1030–1037. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13eGoogle Scholar

Schreiber, CA, Creinin, MD, Atrio, J, Sonalkar, S, Ratcliffe, SJ, Barnhart, KT. Mifepristone pretreatment for the medical management of early pregnancy loss. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2161–2170. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1715726Google Scholar

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Care Services, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S. The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press 2018. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507236/. Accessed March 30, 2020.Google Scholar

Secura, GM, Madden, T, McNicholas, C, et al. Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(14):1316–1323. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1400506Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics. AAP Updates Recommendations on Teen Pregnancy Prevention. http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/AAP-Updates-Recommendations-on-Teen-Pregnancy-Prevention.aspx. Accessed April 7, 2020.Google Scholar

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):e130–e139. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002632Google Scholar

Simonson, K, Pomerantz, T, Mullersman, K, Ly, E, Landy, U. Improving evidence-based practice for LARC: evaluation of the Ryan LARC program. Oral presentation at the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics meeting; 2015.Google Scholar

Kenneth, J. Ryan Residency Training Program in Family Planning and Abortion National Office, 2019 Program Data.Google Scholar

Welcome to Family Planning Fellowship | Family Planning Fellowship. www.familyplanningfellowship.org/. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Colorado’s success with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Department of Public Health and Environment; January 6, 2017. www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/cfpi-report. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Chang, R, Thiel de Bocanegra, H. The impact of postpartum contraception on reducing preterm birth: findings from California. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):703.e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.033Google Scholar

Allen, RH, Cwiak, C, eds. Contraception for the Medically Challenging Patient. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2014.Google Scholar

Thiel de Bocanegra, H, Chang, R, Menz, M, Howell, M, Darney, P. Postpartum contraception in publicly-funded programs and interpregnancy intervals. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):296–303. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182991db6Google Scholar

Thiel de Bocanegra, H, Chang, R, Howell, M, Darney, P. Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):311.e1–311.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.020Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Jensen, JT, Darney, PD, Little, SE, Caughey, AB. The financial effects of expanding postpartum contraception for new immigrants. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):552–558. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d06f96Google Scholar

Darney, PD, Stuart, GS, Thomas, MA, Cwiak, C, Olariu, A, Creinin, MD. Amenorrhea rates and predictors during 1 year of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system use. Contraception. 2018;97(3):210–214. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.005Google Scholar

Archer, DF, Merkatz, RB, Bahamondes, L, et al. Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(8):e1054–e1064. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30265-7Google Scholar

Contraceptive Clinical Trials Network (CCTN). www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/cctn.. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Clinical Practice Handbook for Safe Abortion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190095/. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-4):1–86.Google Scholar

Curtis, KM, Jatlaoui, TC, Tepper, NK, et al. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(4):1–66. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1Google Scholar

Tang, J, Kapp, N, Dragoman, M, de Souza, JP. WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;121(2):186–189. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.009Google Scholar

Lavelanet, AF, Schlitt, S, Johnson, BR, Ganatra, B. Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018;18(1):44. doi:10.1186/s12914-018-0183-1Google Scholar

Medical Management of Abortion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536779/. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Hannaford, PC, Ti, A, Chipato, T, Curtis, KM. Copper intrauterine device use and HIV acquisition in women: a systematic review. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46(1):17–5. doi:10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200512CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jatlaoui, TC, Eckhaus, L, Mandel, MG, et al. Abortion surveillance – United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019;68(11):1–41. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6811a1Google Scholar

Lathrop, E, Romero, L, Hurst, S, et al. The Zika Contraception Access Network: a feasibility programme to increase access to contraception in Puerto Rico during the 2016–17 Zika virus outbreak. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(2):e91–e99. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30001-XGoogle Scholar

Li, R, Simmons, KB, Bertolli, J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of increasing access to contraception during the Zika virus outbreak, Puerto Rico, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(1):74–82. doi:10.3201/eid2301.161322Google Scholar

Curtis, KM, Tepper, NK, Jatlaoui, TC, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(3):1–103. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1Google Scholar

Gavin, L, Moskosky, S, Carter, M, et al. Providing quality family planning services: recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-04):1–54.Google Scholar

The Center for Biomedical Research | Population Council. www.popcouncil.org/cbr. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Charlotte Ellertson Social Science Postdoctoral Fellowship in Abortion and Reproductive Health. Ibis Reproductive Health; May 1, 2011. www.ibisreproductivehealth.org/projects/charlotte-ellertson-social-science-postdoctoral-fellowship-abortion-and-reproductive-health. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Guttmacher Institute. State Facts about Abortion: Massachusetts; January 26, 2016. www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-massachusetts. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Lang, B, Sammel, M, Meisel, Z, Schreiber, C. Most patients with bleeding and cramping in early pregnancy can be safely triaged to the ambulatory setting. Contraception. 2019;100:325. doi:0.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.070Google Scholar

Shorter, JM, Atrio, JM, Schreiber, CA. Management of early pregnancy loss, with a focus on patient centered care. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(2):84–94. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2018.12.005Google Scholar

Miller, CA, Roe, AH, McAllister, A, Meisel, ZF, Koelper, N, Schreiber, CA. Patient experiences with miscarriage management in the emergency and ambulatory settings. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(6):1285–1292. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003571Google Scholar

ACOG Congressional Leadership Conference (CLC). www.acog.org/en/Education. Accessed April 6, 2020.Google Scholar

Lathrop, v. Deal, 801 S.E.2d 867 (Ga 2017).Google Scholar

Weitz, TA, Taylor, D, Desai, S, et al. Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):454–461. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301159Google Scholar

Parker, W. Life’s Work: A Moral Argument for Choice. New York: 37 Ink; 2017.Google Scholar

Gordon, M, McCammon, S. A drug that eases miscarriages is difficult for women to get. NPR; January 10, 2019. www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/01/10/666957368/a-drug-that-eases-miscarriages-is-difficult-for-women-to-getGoogle Scholar

Harris, LH. My day as an abortion care provider. New York Times; October 24, 2019:23.Google Scholar

Hardy-Fairbanks, A. Mother and abortion provider – I can be both. Newsweek; May 11, 2019. www.newsweek.com/abortion-provider-mother-opinion-1409871Google Scholar

Abortion Onscreen. Abortion Onscreen in 2019. San Francisco: Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health; 2019:19. www.ansirh.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/Abortion%20Onscreen%20Report%202019.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2020.Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted December 16, 1966, G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), U.N. GAOR, 21st Sess., Supp. No. 16, at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (entered into force March 23, 1976).Google Scholar

Chavkin, W, Abu-Odeh, D, Clune-Taylor, C, Dubow, S, Ferber, M, Meyer, IH. Balancing freedom of conscience and equitable access. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:1487–1488.Google Scholar

Chavkin, W, Leitman, L, Polin, K. Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a white paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. Int J of Gynecol and Obstet. 2013;123(S3):S41–S56.Google Scholar

Chavkin, W, Swerdlow, L, Fifield, J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(1):55–68.Google Scholar

Melling, L, Lim, M, Brighouse, R, Aviv, NM. Drawing the line: tackling tensions between religious freedom and equality. International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations; 2015. www.cels.org.ar/common/documentos/DrawingtheLine.pdfGoogle Scholar

Raifman, J, Galea, S. The new US “Conscience and Religious Freedom Division”: imposing religious beliefs on others. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(7):889–890.Google Scholar

US Department of the Interior. Basic obligation of public service. www.doi.gov/ethics/basic-obligations-of-public-service. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar

California Senate Bill 277: An Act to Amend Sections 120325, 120335, 120370, and 120375 of, to Add Section 120338 to, and to Repeal Section 120365 of, the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Public Health; 2015. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB277Google Scholar

New York State Senate Bill S2994A: An Act to Amend the Public Health Law, in Relation to Exemptions from Vaccination Due to Religious Beliefs; to Repeal Subdivision 9 of Section 2164 of the Public Health Law, Relating to Exemption from Vaccination Due to Religious Beliefs; and Providing for the Repeal of Certain Provisions upon Expiration Thereof; 2019. www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/s2994Google Scholar

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Adopted 1964. www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar

FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Ethical guidelines on conscientious objection. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;92(3):333–334.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Ethics. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 385: The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine; 2007 (reaffirmed 2019). www.acog.org/Clinical-Guidance-and-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Ethics/The-Limits-of-Conscientious-Refusal-in-Reproductive-Medicine. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar

Zampas, C, Andion-Ibaniez, X. Conscientious objection to sexual and reproductive health services: international human rights standards and European law and practice. Eur J Health Law. 2012;19:231–256.Google Scholar

De Zordo, S, Mishtal, J. Physicians and abortion: provision, political participation and conflicts on the ground – the cases of Brazil and Poland. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(Suppl 3):S32–S36.Google Scholar

Charo, RA. Health care provider refusals to treat, prescribe, refer or inform: professionalism and conscience. Journal ACS Issue Groups. 2007:119–135.Google Scholar

Steinauer, J, Koenemann, K, Coghlan, K, Landy, U, Turk, J. Impact of Ryan Program on resident clinical experience and plans to include abortion in future practice. ePoster presented at the ACOG Annual Clinical Meeting, Nashville, TN; 2019.Google Scholar

Steinauer, JE, Turk, JK, Fulton, MC, Simonson, KH, Landy, U. The benefits of family planning training: a 10-year review of the Ryan Residency Training Program. Contraception. 2013;88(2):275–280. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.006Google Scholar

Harris, LH, Cooper, A, Rasinski, KA, Curlin, FA, Lyerly, AD. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ objections to and willingness to help patients obtain an abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(4):905–912.Google Scholar

Frank, JE. Conscientious refusal in family medicine residency training. Fam Med. 2011;43(5):330–333.Google Scholar

Srinivasulu, S, Maldonado, L, Prine, L, Rubin, SE. Intention to provide abortion upon completing family medicine residency and subsequent abortion provision: a 5-year follow-up survey. Contraception. 2019:100(3):188–192.Google Scholar

Kavanaugh, J. What should we teach medical students about abortion. June 4, 2019, webinar.Google Scholar

Simpson, J. Abortion care: reforming the undergraduate medical curriculum. Paper presented at the meeting of the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, RCOG, 2019.Google Scholar

Stulberg, DB, Dude, AM, Dahlquist, I, Curlin, FA. Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies. Amer J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):73–75.Google Scholar

Norwegian Directorate of Health. Specialist training and authorization for doctors: gynecology. www.helsedirektoratet.no/tema/autorisasjon-og-spesialistutdanning/spesialistutdanning-for-leger/fodselshjelp-og-kvinnesykdommer/laeringsmal?query=gynekologi. Accessed September 26, 2019.Google Scholar